The article 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You examines subtle and often overlooked contributors to anxiety within the framework of Anxiety Management in Popular Psychology, grounded in empirical research and clinical practice in the United States. Although anxiety disorders are among the most prevalent mental health conditions in the United States, many individuals experience persistent anxiety without recognizing the situational, cognitive, and environmental triggers that maintain it. Drawing on cognitive-behavioral, psychophysiological, and contextual models, this article identifies seven frequently underestimated anxiety triggers and situates them within contemporary Anxiety Management science. Each trigger is analyzed in terms of theoretical underpinnings, empirical evidence, and practical implications for assessment and intervention. Emphasis is placed on mechanisms such as intolerance of uncertainty, sleep disruption, and digital overstimulation. By integrating research from clinical psychology, health psychology, and behavioral medicine, the article advances a structured model for identifying hidden anxiety triggers and aligning them with evidence-based Anxiety Management strategies in U.S. clinical and community settings.
Introduction
Anxiety is a normative emotional response to perceived threat, yet when it becomes persistent, excessive, or functionally impairing, it may constitute a clinical concern within the broader domain of Anxiety Management. In the United States, anxiety disorders represent the most common class of mental disorders, with 12-month prevalence estimates exceeding 18 percent among adults (Kessler et al., 2005). However, many individuals who do not meet full diagnostic criteria still experience chronic distress linked to unrecognized triggers embedded in everyday routines. The concept of 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You reflects an applied effort within Popular Psychology to translate empirical findings into accessible frameworks without compromising scientific rigor.
Within the parent category of Anxiety Management, identifying triggers is foundational to both prevention and treatment. Cognitive-behavioral therapy, widely disseminated across U.S. clinical settings, begins with functional analysis of antecedents and maintaining factors (Barlow, 2002). Yet triggers are often conceptualized narrowly as obvious stressors, such as public speaking or examinations. Emerging evidence suggests that subtle environmental, cognitive, and physiological factors can operate outside conscious awareness while sustaining hyperarousal and worry. This article delineates seven empirically supported but frequently underestimated triggers, integrating theory, evidence, and application.
Conceptual Foundations in Anxiety Management
Theoretical Models of Anxiety Triggers
Within Anxiety Management science, anxiety triggers are best understood through multi-level models that integrate cognitive appraisal, physiological reactivity, and contextual influences. Cognitive theories emphasize maladaptive beliefs, attentional biases, and catastrophic interpretations as proximal mechanisms of anxiety (Beck & Clark, 1997). From this perspective, triggers are not merely external events but internal interpretations that activate threat schemas.
Behavioral and learning models further clarify how neutral stimuli acquire anxiety-provoking properties through conditioning processes. Classical conditioning can pair environmental cues with fear responses, while operant conditioning reinforces avoidance behaviors that maintain anxiety over time (Barlow, 2002). Consequently, subtle cues such as digital notifications or ambiguous social messages may function as conditioned triggers despite lacking inherent threat.
Neurobiological models add an additional layer by highlighting amygdala hyperreactivity and dysregulated prefrontal control in anxiety disorders (Etkin & Wager, 2007). These neural patterns increase sensitivity to uncertainty and novelty, thereby lowering the threshold at which everyday stimuli become anxiety triggers. Integrating these models clarifies why triggers may be diffuse, cumulative, and difficult to consciously identify.
Functional Analysis and Hidden Antecedents
Functional analysis remains a central tool in U.S.-based Anxiety Management practice. Clinicians assess antecedents, behaviors, and consequences to map anxiety-maintaining cycles. However, hidden antecedents often operate indirectly, including physiological states such as sleep deprivation or environmental variables such as constant digital exposure.
Research in stress physiology demonstrates that chronic activation of stress systems increases baseline arousal and reduces emotional flexibility (McEwen, 2007). Under such conditions, neutral stimuli are more likely to be interpreted as threatening. Thus, triggers may reflect cumulative allostatic load rather than discrete stress events.
This functional lens reframes 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You as an empirically grounded categorization of antecedents that commonly evade awareness. Identifying these triggers strengthens preventive and therapeutic components of Anxiety Management by expanding assessment beyond overt stressors.
Trigger 1: Chronic Sleep Disruption
Physiological Sensitization and Emotional Reactivity
Sleep disruption is one of the most robust yet underestimated anxiety triggers. Experimental and longitudinal studies consistently demonstrate bidirectional associations between sleep disturbance and anxiety symptoms (Alvaro et al., 2013). In U.S. population samples, insomnia symptoms predict subsequent development of anxiety disorders, even after controlling for baseline distress.
Neuroimaging research indicates that sleep deprivation heightens amygdala reactivity while reducing functional connectivity with regulatory prefrontal regions (Yoo et al., 2007). This neural imbalance lowers the threshold for perceiving threat and intensifies worry responses. Individuals may attribute increased anxiety to situational stress while overlooking insufficient sleep as the primary trigger.
Within Anxiety Management interventions, sleep hygiene is often treated as a secondary lifestyle factor. However, empirical evidence suggests it should be conceptualized as a core trigger requiring structured intervention.
Behavioral Patterns That Sustain the Cycle
Sleep-related anxiety frequently becomes self-perpetuating. Individuals experiencing worry may delay bedtime, engage in late-night screen use, or increase caffeine consumption, reinforcing physiological hyperarousal. Over time, the bedroom environment may become conditioned as a cue for rumination and tension.
Clinical trials of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia demonstrate that improving sleep quality reduces comorbid anxiety symptoms (Belleville et al., 2011). This evidence supports classifying chronic sleep disruption within the framework of 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You and underscores its relevance for Anxiety Management in both clinical and community contexts.
Trigger 2: Intolerance of Uncertainty in Daily Decisions
Cognitive Biases and Perceived Threat
Intolerance of uncertainty is strongly associated with generalized anxiety and excessive worry (Dugas et al., 1998). Individuals high in this construct interpret ambiguous situations as threatening even when objective risk is low. In the United States, sociopolitical and economic variability may amplify exposure to uncertain contexts, increasing vulnerability to this trigger.
Empirical studies demonstrate that intolerance of uncertainty predicts worry severity beyond trait anxiety (Carleton, 2016). Everyday situations such as waiting for feedback, navigating ambiguous communication, or anticipating minor outcomes may provoke disproportionate distress. Because these contexts appear trivial, the trigger often remains unrecognized.
Within Anxiety Management, cognitive-behavioral interventions target intolerance of uncertainty through graduated exposure to ambiguity and cognitive restructuring techniques.
Micro-Decision Fatigue and Cognitive Load
Contemporary environments require constant micro-decisions, from digital interactions to workplace demands. Decision fatigue research indicates that repeated choices deplete self-regulatory resources and increase emotional reactivity (Vohs et al., 2008). Under cognitive depletion, ambiguous cues are more likely to be interpreted negatively.
The interaction between decision fatigue and intolerance of uncertainty illustrates how subtle stressors accumulate to sustain anxiety. In Anxiety Management practice, reducing unnecessary decision load and implementing structured routines may mitigate this trigger. Recognizing this mechanism aligns directly with the broader framework articulated in 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You.
Table 1
Neurobiological and Behavioral Mechanisms Linking Sleep Disruption to Anxiety
| Mechanism | Theoretical Framework | Empirical Support | Clinical Implication in Anxiety Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amygdala hyperreactivity | Affective neuroscience models of threat detection | Yoo et al. (2007) demonstrated amplified amygdala activation under sleep deprivation | Increased baseline threat sensitivity; prioritize sleep stabilization before intensive exposure work |
| Reduced prefrontal regulation | Top-down cognitive control models | Sleep loss impairs medial prefrontal modulation of limbic structures | Cognitive restructuring less effective without sleep normalization |
| Elevated allostatic load | Stress physiology and HPA-axis dysregulation (McEwen, 2007) | Chronic sleep disruption associated with prolonged cortisol activation | Integrate sleep hygiene into primary treatment targets |
| Conditioned bedtime arousal | Classical conditioning models | Insomnia literature shows bed-rumination pairing | Stimulus control and CBT-I protocols reduce anticipatory anxiety |
Analytical Value:
This table clarifies that sleep is not merely a correlational factor but a mechanistic amplifier of threat processing across neurobiological and behavioral domains. Within Anxiety Management, it supports reclassifying sleep disruption from secondary lifestyle variable to primary intervention target.
Table 2
Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Intolerance of Uncertainty in Anxiety
| Cognitive Process | Core Theoretical Basis | Functional Role in Anxiety | Evidence-Based Intervention |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threat amplification of ambiguity | Cognitive model of anxiety (Beck & Clark, 1997) | Neutral stimuli interpreted as potential danger | Cognitive restructuring of probability overestimation |
| Negative problem orientation | Intolerance of uncertainty model (Dugas et al., 1998) | Worry used as perceived coping strategy | Worry exposure and delayed worry scheduling |
| Ambiguity aversion | Uncertainty distress framework (Carleton, 2016) | Avoidance of incomplete information | Graduated uncertainty exposure |
| Decision fatigue vulnerability | Self-regulation depletion models (Vohs et al., 2008) | Reduced cognitive flexibility increases catastrophic bias | Routine structuring and decision simplification |
Analytical Value:
This table demonstrates that intolerance of uncertainty operates through multiple interacting cognitive mechanisms rather than a single dispositional trait. In Anxiety Management, this differentiation guides precise intervention matching.
Trigger 3: Digital Hyperconnectivity and Persistent Social Evaluation
Attentional Fragmentation and Cognitive Load
Digital hyperconnectivity has emerged as a contextually embedded anxiety trigger within contemporary U.S. environments, where individuals are exposed to near-continuous streams of information. Within the broader framework of Anxiety Management, technological exposure must be conceptualized not merely as lifestyle behavior but as an environmental condition capable of shaping attentional regulation and emotional reactivity. Frequent notifications, rapid task-switching, and perpetual access to work-related communication contribute to sustained anticipatory vigilance. Even when individual messages are neutral, unpredictability in timing and content activates monitoring systems associated with uncertainty processing.
Experimental research demonstrates that heavy media multitasking is associated with reduced attentional control and increased susceptibility to distraction (Ophir et al., 2009). Impaired attentional control compromises executive regulation of emotional responses, increasing vulnerability to intrusive worry. When attentional fragmentation becomes chronic, cognitive resources necessary for adaptive coping are diminished. Within the conceptual structure of 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You, digital fragmentation functions as a cumulative micro-stressor rather than a single acute event.
Theoretical models of self-regulation further suggest that repeated attentional shifts deplete cognitive control mechanisms (Baumeister et al., 1998). Under depletion conditions, individuals rely more heavily on automatic threat appraisals and catastrophic interpretations. Consequently, digital hyperconnectivity indirectly amplifies anxiety by weakening regulatory capacity. In applied Anxiety Management interventions, structured technology boundaries and scheduled communication windows are increasingly recommended to reduce cognitive overload.
Social Comparison and Perceived Evaluation
Digital platforms also intensify social comparison processes. Social comparison theory posits that individuals evaluate themselves relative to others, particularly in ambiguous or achievement-oriented contexts (Festinger, 1954). Algorithmically curated content often highlights idealized portrayals of success, attractiveness, and productivity. Repeated upward comparisons can heighten self-evaluative anxiety and perceived inadequacy.
Empirical studies in U.S. college samples indicate that greater social media engagement correlates with higher anxiety symptoms, especially when use is characterized by passive scrolling rather than active communication (Vannucci et al., 2017). Although correlational findings require cautious interpretation, experimental reductions in social media exposure have been associated with improvements in psychological well-being in some populations. These findings suggest that digital hyperconnectivity may serve as an anxiety trigger through evaluative and comparative mechanisms rather than through content alone.
Within Anxiety Management practice, clinicians increasingly incorporate psychoeducation regarding algorithmic influence, cognitive distortions related to comparison, and self-compassion training. Recognizing digital hyperconnectivity as one of the 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You situates technological exposure within empirically grounded cognitive and behavioral frameworks.
Table 3
Digital Hyperconnectivity as an Anxiety Trigger: Mechanisms and Interventions
| Mechanism | Theoretical Basis | Empirical Support | Anxiety Management Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attentional fragmentation | Executive control models | Ophir et al. (2009) | Scheduled notification checking |
| Self-regulation depletion | Ego depletion framework (Baumeister et al., 1998) | Laboratory depletion paradigms | Technology boundaries and digital fasting |
| Upward social comparison | Social comparison theory (Festinger, 1954) | Vannucci et al. (2017) | Cognitive restructuring of comparative beliefs |
| Perceived constant evaluation | Social evaluative threat models | Anxiety research in evaluative contexts | Self-compassion and values clarification |
Trigger 4: Subtle Avoidance and Safety Behaviors
Behavioral Avoidance and Maintenance Cycles
Avoidance remains a central maintaining mechanism in anxiety disorders and occupies a foundational position within Anxiety Management theory. However, not all avoidance behaviors are overt. Subtle safety behaviors, such as excessive preparation, reassurance-seeking, strategic positioning in social settings, or habitual checking, often appear adaptive while reinforcing threat beliefs.
Cognitive-behavioral models propose that avoidance prevents corrective learning by limiting exposure to disconfirmatory evidence (Barlow, 2002). When feared outcomes fail to occur, individuals attribute safety to the protective behavior rather than to the absence of objective threat. This misattribution strengthens perceived vulnerability and sustains anticipatory anxiety. Within 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You, subtle avoidance functions as a hidden trigger because it perpetuates physiological arousal prior to exposure to feared situations.
Empirical research in social anxiety demonstrates that safety behaviors increase self-focused attention and heighten subjective anxiety during social interaction (McManus et al., 2008). Rather than reducing distress, protective behaviors amplify internal monitoring and threat appraisal. In Anxiety Management practice, systematic identification and gradual elimination of safety behaviors are critical components of exposure-based interventions.
Cognitive Avoidance and Suppression
Avoidance may also occur at the cognitive level through thought suppression and excessive mental rehearsal. Experimental studies indicate that attempts to suppress unwanted thoughts paradoxically increase their recurrence, a phenomenon termed the ironic process effect (Wegner, 1994). Suppression therefore intensifies anxiety by maintaining cognitive salience of feared content.
Rumination and repetitive negative thinking similarly function as cognitive avoidance strategies. Although rumination appears reflective, it often substitutes for direct emotional processing and maintains physiological arousal. Neuroimaging research has linked repetitive self-referential thinking to sustained activation of neural networks associated with internal focus (Hamilton et al., 2015). This sustained activation may impair disengagement from threat-related stimuli.
Within Anxiety Management interventions, exposure to feared thoughts through imaginal exposure and mindfulness-based strategies aims to reduce reliance on cognitive avoidance. Conceptualizing subtle avoidance as one of the 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You reframes common coping behaviors as mechanisms sustaining anxiety cycles rather than alleviating them.
Table 4
Subtle Avoidance Behaviors as Anxiety Triggers
| Type of Avoidance | Mechanism | Empirical Evidence | Intervention Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety behaviors | Prevents disconfirmation of threat | McManus et al. (2008) | Behavioral experiments |
| Reassurance-seeking | Reinforces perceived vulnerability | CBT maintenance models | Response prevention |
| Thought suppression | Ironic rebound effect | Wegner (1994) | Acceptance-based techniques |
| Rumination | Sustained threat processing | Hamilton et al. (2015) | Mindfulness and metacognitive therapy |
Trigger 5: Environmental Overstimulation and Chronic Sensory Load
Urban Density, Noise, and Physiological Stress
Environmental overstimulation constitutes a frequently underestimated anxiety trigger, particularly within densely populated U.S. urban contexts. Chronic exposure to traffic noise, crowded public spaces, artificial lighting, and continuous background media increases baseline sympathetic nervous system activation. Although each stimulus may appear minor in isolation, cumulative sensory input contributes to sustained physiological arousal that lowers the threshold for anxiety responses.
Environmental stress research indicates that chronic noise exposure is associated with elevated stress hormones and increased psychological distress (Stansfeld & Matheson, 2003). Prolonged activation of stress systems contributes to irritability, attentional fatigue, and heightened vigilance. Within Anxiety Management models, overstimulation operates as a contextual antecedent that intensifies reactivity to otherwise manageable stressors. Individuals may misattribute anxiety to interpersonal or occupational demands while overlooking the physiological burden imposed by environmental load.
Cognitive load theory further suggests that excessive sensory input competes for limited attentional resources, impairing executive functioning. Reduced executive capacity weakens cognitive reappraisal processes central to Anxiety Management interventions. Environmental modification, structured quiet periods, and restorative exposure to low-stimulation settings therefore represent evidence-informed strategies for reducing this trigger.
Person–Environment Fit and Sensory Sensitivity
Individual differences moderate vulnerability to overstimulation. Sensory processing sensitivity, a trait characterized by heightened responsiveness to environmental stimuli, predicts increased emotional reactivity under high-stimulation conditions (Aron & Aron, 1997). While not pathological, elevated sensitivity may increase susceptibility to chronic stress in overstimulating environments.
Research indicates that high-sensitivity individuals exhibit greater stress responses in chaotic contexts but function comparably to peers in supportive, low-load environments. This interaction underscores the relevance of person–environment fit within Anxiety Management frameworks. Tailoring environmental conditions to individual sensory profiles can reduce baseline arousal and improve coping efficacy.
Recognizing environmental overstimulation as one of the 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You extends Anxiety Management beyond intrapsychic processes toward ecological intervention. Such recognition aligns with contemporary integrative models that conceptualize anxiety as emerging from dynamic interactions among biological, psychological, and environmental systems.
Trigger 6: Perfectionistic Self-Standards and Conditional Self-Worth
Maladaptive Perfectionism and Fear of Evaluation
Perfectionism represents a cognitive vulnerability factor strongly associated with anxiety disorders. Multidimensional models differentiate between adaptive striving and maladaptive evaluative concerns, the latter predicting heightened anxiety and worry (Frost et al., 1990). Within U.S. achievement-oriented cultural contexts, perfectionistic standards are often socially reinforced, obscuring their role as anxiety triggers.
Maladaptive perfectionism involves fear of negative evaluation, excessive concern over mistakes, and contingent self-worth. These cognitive patterns amplify perceived threat in performance situations, even when objective risk is minimal. Empirical studies demonstrate that evaluative concerns perfectionism predicts social anxiety and generalized anxiety symptoms beyond trait neuroticism (Egan et al., 2011).
Within the structure of 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You, perfectionistic standards function as internal triggers that activate chronic self-monitoring. Anxiety Management interventions targeting perfectionism typically incorporate cognitive restructuring of conditional beliefs and behavioral experiments designed to test feared outcomes associated with imperfection.
Performance Pressure and Chronic Hypervigilance
Perfectionism also sustains chronic hypervigilance through anticipatory self-criticism. Individuals high in evaluative concerns anticipate negative judgment even in neutral contexts. This anticipatory processing increases physiological arousal and reduces attentional flexibility.
Longitudinal research indicates that perfectionistic concerns predict increases in anxiety over time, suggesting causal influence rather than mere correlation (Egan et al., 2011). Within Anxiety Management practice, addressing perfectionism is essential to reducing persistent baseline anxiety that arises independent of external threat.
Recognizing perfectionistic self-standards as one of the 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You reframes culturally normalized achievement pressures as clinically relevant maintaining mechanisms. Intervention strategies often integrate exposure to “imperfect” performance, self-compassion training, and values clarification to decouple self-worth from flawless outcomes.
Trigger 7: Subclinical Health Anxiety and Interoceptive Misinterpretation
Heightened Interoceptive Awareness
Subclinical health anxiety frequently operates below diagnostic thresholds while contributing to persistent distress. Individuals may misinterpret benign bodily sensations as indicators of serious illness, activating threat appraisal systems central to anxiety disorders. Cognitive models of panic and health anxiety emphasize catastrophic misinterpretation of interoceptive cues (Clark, 1986).
Even mild physiological sensations such as heart rate fluctuations, gastrointestinal discomfort, or transient dizziness may be interpreted as signs of impending harm. This misinterpretation initiates a feedback loop in which anxiety increases physiological arousal, thereby confirming perceived threat. Within Anxiety Management frameworks, identifying interoceptive misinterpretation is essential to interrupting this cycle.
Empirical studies support the role of anxiety sensitivity, defined as fear of anxiety-related sensations, in predicting panic and generalized anxiety symptoms (Reiss et al., 1986). Anxiety sensitivity amplifies responses to normal physiological changes, increasing vulnerability to chronic worry.
Medical Information Exposure and Reassurance Cycles
Access to online medical information further intensifies health-related triggers. Repeated symptom checking and reassurance-seeking behaviors reinforce vigilance and maintain anxiety. Although reassurance temporarily reduces distress, it prevents cognitive disconfirmation of catastrophic beliefs.
Cognitive-behavioral treatments for health anxiety emphasize interoceptive exposure and reduction of reassurance-seeking behaviors. Within the integrative model presented in 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You, subclinical health anxiety exemplifies how misinterpretation of internal cues can operate as a persistent yet unrecognized trigger.
Table 5 synthesizes cross-trigger mechanisms and intervention principles.
Table 5
Integrative Model of Hidden Anxiety Triggers
| Trigger Domain | Core Mechanism | Maintaining Process | Primary Anxiety Management Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physiological (Sleep, Interoception) | Heightened baseline arousal | Misinterpretation of bodily cues | Regulation and interoceptive exposure |
| Cognitive (Uncertainty, Perfectionism) | Threat amplification | Catastrophic appraisal | Cognitive restructuring and exposure |
| Behavioral (Avoidance, Reassurance) | Prevention of disconfirmation | Negative reinforcement | Response prevention |
| Environmental (Digital, Sensory Load) | Attentional depletion | Chronic vigilance | Environmental modification |
Conclusion
The framework of 7 Anxiety Triggers You Don’t Even Realize Are Affecting You demonstrates that anxiety is frequently sustained by subtle, cumulative, and contextually embedded mechanisms rather than by singular acute stressors. Within the broader domain of Anxiety Management, effective intervention requires systematic identification of physiological, cognitive, behavioral, and environmental antecedents that operate outside conscious awareness.
Sleep disruption, intolerance of uncertainty, digital hyperconnectivity, subtle avoidance, environmental overstimulation, perfectionistic standards, and interoceptive misinterpretation each illustrate distinct yet interacting pathways to chronic anxiety. Integrating these triggers into functional assessment strengthens both preventive and therapeutic strategies.
Future directions in Anxiety Management research should continue examining ecological and technological contributors to anxiety while refining multi-level intervention models. Recognizing hidden triggers expands the scope of clinical assessment and promotes more comprehensive, evidence-based approaches to anxiety reduction in the United States and comparable contexts.
References
Alvaro, P. K., Roberts, R. M., & Harris, J. K. (2013). A systematic review assessing bidirectionality between sleep disturbances, anxiety, and depression. Sleep, 36(7), 1059–1068.
Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345–368.
Barlow, D. H. (2002). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265.
Beck, A. T., & Clark, D. A. (1997). An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(1), 49–58.
Carleton, R. N. (2016). Fear of the unknown: One fear to rule them all? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 41, 5–21.
Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24(4), 461–470.
Dugas, M. J., Gagnon, F., Ladouceur, R., & Freeston, M. H. (1998). Generalized anxiety disorder: A preliminary test of a conceptual model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(2), 215–226.
Egan, S. J., Wade, T. D., & Shafran, R. (2011). Perfectionism as a transdiagnostic process: A clinical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(2), 203–212.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.
Hamilton, J. P., Farmer, M., Fogelman, P., & Gotlib, I. H. (2015). Depressive rumination, the default-mode network, and the dark matter of clinical neuroscience. Biological Psychiatry, 78(4), 224–230.
Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 617–627.
McManus, F., Sacadura, C., & Clark, D. M. (2008). Why social anxiety persists: An experimental investigation of the role of safety behaviours as a maintaining factor. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39(2), 147–161.
Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587.
Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24(1), 1–8.
Stansfeld, S. A., & Matheson, M. P. (2003). Noise pollution: Non-auditory effects on health. British Medical Bulletin, 68(1), 243–257.
Vannucci, A., Flannery, K. M., & Ohannessian, C. M. (2017). Social media use and anxiety in emerging adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 207, 163–166.
Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101(1), 34–52.
Yoo, S. S., Gujar, N., Hu, P., Jolesz, F. A., & Walker, M. P. (2007). The human emotional brain without sleep: A prefrontal amygdala disconnect. Current Biology, 17(20), R877–R878.