Emotional labor, defined as the process of managing emotions to create a publicly observable emotional display, has emerged as a critical factor influencing workplace satisfaction in service professions. This review examines the theoretical foundations, measurement approaches, and empirical evidence regarding emotional labor’s impact on employee satisfaction across diverse service industries. Drawing from Hochschild’s foundational work and subsequent theoretical developments, this article synthesizes research on surface acting, deep acting, and genuine emotion expression as distinct strategies for managing emotional demands. Meta-analytic evidence reveals complex relationships between emotional labor strategies and satisfaction outcomes, with surface acting consistently associated with decreased satisfaction while deep acting and genuine emotion expression show more positive associations. The review identifies key moderating factors including organizational support, individual differences, and occupational characteristics that influence the emotional labor-satisfaction relationship. Consequences of prolonged emotional labor include emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced sense of personal accomplishment, which collectively contribute to decreased workplace satisfaction and increased turnover intentions. The article concludes with practical implications for service organizations seeking to manage emotional labor demands while maintaining employee well-being and satisfaction.
Introduction
The concept of emotional labor has fundamentally transformed our understanding of work demands in service-oriented economies, where interpersonal interactions constitute the primary mechanism for value creation. Service professions, ranging from healthcare and education to hospitality and retail, require employees to manage their emotional expressions as part of their job responsibilities, creating unique psychological demands that significantly influence workplace satisfaction. Unlike traditional conceptualizations of work that focused primarily on physical or cognitive demands, emotional labor recognizes that managing emotions constitutes a distinct form of work that can be both rewarding and depleting.
Hochschild’s (1983) seminal work on emotional labor introduced the discipline to the idea that emotions in the workplace are not merely incidental experiences but are actively managed and commodified as part of service delivery. This perspective revealed that service workers are expected to display specific emotions regardless of their genuine feelings, creating potential conflicts between felt and expressed emotions that can significantly impact job satisfaction and well-being. The recognition that emotional management constitutes a form of labor has profound implications for understanding employee experiences in service industries.
The prevalence of service work in modern economies makes emotional labor a widespread phenomenon affecting millions of workers worldwide. As economies have shifted from manufacturing to service-based models, an increasing proportion of the workforce engages in jobs that require significant emotional labor. This transformation has made understanding the relationship between emotional labor and workplace satisfaction increasingly important for both theoretical advancement and practical application in human resource management.
Contemporary research has revealed that emotional labor’s impact on workplace satisfaction is neither uniform nor straightforward, but varies depending on the specific strategies employed, individual characteristics, and organizational contexts. This complexity requires nuanced approaches to understanding and managing emotional labor demands in ways that support both service quality and employee well-being. The current review synthesizes existing research to provide comprehensive insights into how emotional labor affects workplace satisfaction in service professions.
Theoretical Foundations of Emotional Labor
Hochschild’s Foundational Framework
Arlie Hochschild’s groundbreaking work established emotional labor as the management of feeling to create a publicly observable facial and bodily display, representing a commercialization of human emotion for organizational purposes. Her research with flight attendants revealed how service organizations explicitly train employees to manage their emotional expressions, creating feeling rules that dictate appropriate emotional displays regardless of workers’ actual feelings. This conceptualization highlighted the potential conflict between authentic emotions and organizationally mandated emotional displays, introducing the possibility that emotional labor could create psychological strain and affect job satisfaction.
The distinction between emotional labor and emotional work represents a crucial theoretical contribution, with emotional labor specifically referring to emotion management that has exchange value in the labor market. This commercialization of emotion creates unique dynamics where personal emotional resources become commodified, potentially leading to alienation and dissatisfaction when workers feel their authentic selves are being suppressed or modified for organizational purposes. The concept of emotional dissonance, arising from conflicts between felt and expressed emotions, emerged as a key mechanism through which emotional labor might negatively impact workplace satisfaction.
Hochschild’s framework also introduced the concepts of surface acting and deep acting as distinct strategies for managing emotional labor demands. Surface acting involves changing outward emotional expressions without modifying underlying feelings, essentially creating a facade of appropriate emotion. Deep acting involves attempting to actually feel the emotions that one is required to express, representing a more authentic but potentially more psychologically demanding approach to emotional labor. These distinctions have proven crucial for understanding differential impacts of emotional labor on workplace satisfaction.
Theoretical Extensions and Refinements
Subsequent theoretical development has expanded and refined Hochschild’s original framework, introducing additional concepts and mechanisms that help explain the complex relationship between emotional labor and workplace satisfaction. The concept of genuine emotion expression, representing situations where felt and expressed emotions naturally align, has been added to the original surface acting and deep acting dichotomy. This addition recognizes that not all emotional labor is necessarily artificial or potentially harmful, as some service encounters may naturally evoke appropriate emotions in workers.
Emotional labor theory has been enriched through integration with broader theoretical frameworks from organizational psychology and sociology. Job demands-resources theory provides insight into how emotional labor demands might deplete psychological resources while emotional and organizational resources might buffer negative effects. Social identity theory helps explain how emotional labor requirements might conflict with personal identity and values, contributing to dissatisfaction when workers feel they are being asked to present inauthentic versions of themselves.
The development of emotional labor theory has also been influenced by growing understanding of emotion regulation processes from cognitive psychology. This integration has highlighted the cognitive and physiological costs associated with different emotion regulation strategies, providing mechanisms through which emotional labor might influence workplace satisfaction. The effortful nature of emotion regulation, particularly surface acting, has been identified as a key factor contributing to emotional exhaustion and subsequent satisfaction decline.
Measurement and Conceptual Clarification
The measurement of emotional labor has evolved significantly since Hochschild’s original qualitative investigations, with researchers developing psychometrically sound instruments that capture the multidimensional nature of emotional labor constructs. Early measurement approaches often conflated emotional labor with related concepts such as emotional intelligence or general emotion regulation, creating conceptual confusion that hindered theoretical advancement. Contemporary measures explicitly distinguish between different emotional labor strategies and their relationships with various outcome variables.
The development of valid measurement instruments has been crucial for establishing empirical relationships between emotional labor and workplace satisfaction. Instruments such as the Emotional Labor Scale and various adaptations have enabled systematic investigation of emotional labor’s antecedents and consequences across diverse service professions. These measurement advances have revealed that emotional labor is best conceptualized as a multidimensional construct with distinct strategies having different relationships with satisfaction outcomes.
Conceptual clarification efforts have also addressed the distinction between emotional labor as job requirement and emotional labor as individual strategy, recognizing that organizational display rules create the context for emotional labor while individual differences influence how workers respond to these requirements. This distinction has important implications for understanding satisfaction outcomes, as workers who naturally align with organizational display rules may experience less strain than those who must actively manage emotional dissonance.
Emotional Labor Strategies and Satisfaction Outcomes
Surface Acting and Its Detrimental Effects
Surface acting, characterized by the modification of outward emotional expressions without corresponding changes in underlying feelings, has consistently emerged as the most problematic form of emotional labor in terms of workplace satisfaction outcomes. Meta-analytic evidence reveals strong negative associations between surface acting and job satisfaction across diverse service professions, with effect sizes suggesting practical significance for employee well-being. The psychological mechanisms underlying these negative effects include emotional exhaustion from the effort required to maintain inauthentic emotional displays and reduced sense of authenticity that undermines intrinsic motivation and satisfaction.
The effortful nature of surface acting creates ongoing psychological strain that accumulates over time, leading to what researchers have termed “emotional dissonance” or the uncomfortable tension between felt and expressed emotions. This dissonance appears to be particularly problematic for workplace satisfaction because it creates a fundamental conflict between personal authenticity and job requirements. Workers who frequently engage in surface acting report feeling alienated from their work and disconnected from their authentic selves, contributing to decreased satisfaction and increased turnover intentions.
Research has identified several factors that exacerbate the negative effects of surface acting on workplace satisfaction. High frequency and duration of surface acting requirements create more severe satisfaction problems than occasional or brief emotional labor demands. The intensity of required emotional displays also influences satisfaction outcomes, with more extreme emotional expressions requiring greater effort and creating more significant authenticity conflicts. Individual differences in acting ability and comfort with emotional display also moderate the strength of negative effects.
Deep Acting and Authentic Emotion Management
Deep acting, involving attempts to actually experience the emotions one is required to express, shows more complex relationships with workplace satisfaction that depend on various contextual and individual factors. While deep acting eliminates the authenticity conflicts associated with surface acting, it requires significant psychological effort and can lead to emotional exhaustion when consistently applied across diverse service encounters. However, successful deep acting can enhance satisfaction by creating alignment between personal values and job requirements, particularly when organizational display rules are consistent with workers’ natural emotional tendencies.
The effectiveness of deep acting for maintaining workplace satisfaction appears to depend on workers’ ability to successfully modify their emotional experiences and the congruence between required emotions and personal values. Workers who can effectively engage in deep acting often report higher satisfaction than those who rely primarily on surface acting, but lower satisfaction than those who can express genuine emotions. The psychological effort required for deep acting, while less problematic than surface acting, still represents a job demand that can contribute to strain and reduced satisfaction over time.
Training and organizational support for deep acting strategies can influence their impact on workplace satisfaction. Organizations that provide emotion regulation training and support for authentic emotion development often see better satisfaction outcomes among workers who engage in deep acting. However, the sustainability of deep acting strategies depends on individual emotional resources and the reasonableness of organizational display rule requirements.
Genuine Emotion Expression and Optimal Outcomes
Genuine emotion expression, representing situations where workers’ natural emotional responses align with organizational display rules, consistently shows the most positive associations with workplace satisfaction in service professions. When workers can authentically express appropriate emotions without effort or artifice, they experience the benefits of emotional authenticity while meeting job requirements. This alignment between personal and organizational emotional expectations creates optimal conditions for workplace satisfaction and well-being.
The occurrence of genuine emotion expression depends on careful selection and placement of workers whose natural emotional tendencies align with job requirements, as well as organizational cultures that support authentic emotional expression. Some service professions naturally attract individuals whose values and emotional styles align with job requirements, creating conditions where genuine emotion expression is more likely. Healthcare professionals who are naturally empathetic, teachers who genuinely enjoy working with students, and hospitality workers who authentically enjoy serving others represent examples of this alignment.
Organizational factors that promote genuine emotion expression include clear communication of organizational values, selection processes that assess person-job fit regarding emotional requirements, and supportive cultures that acknowledge the importance of emotional well-being. When organizations create conditions that support genuine emotion expression, they typically observe higher levels of workplace satisfaction, reduced turnover, and improved service quality from employees who can authentically engage in their emotional labor.
Individual and Occupational Moderating Factors
Personality Characteristics and Emotional Competence
Individual differences in personality characteristics significantly moderate the relationship between emotional labor and workplace satisfaction, with some individuals showing greater resilience to emotional labor demands while others are more susceptible to negative effects. Emotional intelligence, representing the ability to perceive, understand, and manage emotions effectively, serves as a crucial moderator that can buffer the negative effects of emotional labor on satisfaction. Workers with higher emotional intelligence typically show better adaptation to emotional labor requirements and maintain higher satisfaction levels even when engaging in demanding emotional work.
The Big Five personality dimensions also influence how emotional labor affects workplace satisfaction. Individuals high in extraversion often find emotional labor less demanding and more satisfying, particularly when it involves positive emotional displays and social interaction. Conscientiousness may help workers develop effective strategies for managing emotional labor demands, while neuroticism increases vulnerability to emotional labor strain and associated satisfaction problems. Agreeableness may facilitate authentic positive emotions in service encounters, reducing the need for effortful emotional regulation.
Acting ability and comfort with emotional expression represent additional individual differences that influence emotional labor outcomes. Workers who are naturally skilled at emotional expression or who are comfortable with performance aspects of service work often experience less strain from emotional labor requirements. These individuals may view emotional labor as an opportunity for creative expression rather than a burdensome job requirement, contributing to higher workplace satisfaction.
Occupational Characteristics and Context
Different service professions create varying emotional labor demands that significantly influence the relationship between emotional labor and workplace satisfaction. Healthcare professions often require complex emotional management involving empathy, compassion, and professional detachment, creating unique challenges for emotional labor and satisfaction. The life-and-death nature of healthcare work can make emotional authenticity particularly important for worker satisfaction, while also creating intense emotional demands that can lead to exhaustion and burnout.
Educational professions involve emotional labor demands related to student motivation, classroom management, and professional relationships with colleagues and parents. Teachers must manage their own emotions while also helping students develop emotional regulation skills, creating multilayered emotional labor requirements. The intrinsic motivation associated with educational missions can enhance satisfaction when emotional labor aligns with professional values, but can create significant strain when external pressures conflict with educational ideals.
Hospitality and retail professions typically emphasize positive emotional displays and customer satisfaction, creating emotional labor demands focused on pleasantness and service orientation. The routine nature of many service encounters in these industries can make emotional labor feel particularly artificial, but the immediate feedback from satisfied customers can also provide intrinsic rewards that enhance satisfaction. The status and respect associated with different service professions also influence how workers experience emotional labor requirements.
Organizational Support and Resources
Organizational support for emotional labor represents a crucial moderating factor that can significantly influence the relationship between emotional labor and workplace satisfaction. Organizations that acknowledge the emotional demands of service work and provide appropriate resources and support typically see better satisfaction outcomes among their employees. This support can take various forms, including training programs that help workers develop effective emotional regulation strategies, counseling services that address emotional strain, and policies that recognize the legitimate costs of emotional labor.
Management practices that demonstrate understanding and appreciation for emotional labor can significantly enhance workplace satisfaction. Supervisors who acknowledge the difficulty of managing difficult customers, provide emotional support during challenging encounters, and recognize excellent emotional labor performance help create positive work environments. Conversely, management approaches that ignore or minimize emotional labor demands often contribute to satisfaction problems and increased turnover.
Resource availability, including adequate staffing levels, reasonable workloads, and appropriate break time, influences workers’ capacity to manage emotional labor effectively. When workers are overwhelmed with excessive demands or lack time to recover from emotionally challenging encounters, they are more likely to experience satisfaction problems. Organizations that provide adequate resources and recovery time help workers maintain their emotional resources and sustain satisfaction over time.
Consequences and Outcomes of Emotional Labor
Emotional Exhaustion and Burnout
Emotional exhaustion represents one of the most significant consequences of prolonged emotional labor, particularly when workers rely heavily on surface acting or face excessive emotional demands without adequate resources or support. This exhaustion manifests as depletion of emotional resources, reduced capacity for empathy and caring, and general feelings of being emotionally drained by work requirements. Research consistently shows strong relationships between emotional labor demands and emotional exhaustion, with this exhaustion serving as a key mediator in the relationship between emotional labor and reduced workplace satisfaction.
The development of emotional exhaustion from emotional labor follows predictable patterns related to the intensity, frequency, and duration of emotional demands. Workers who face constant requirements for positive emotional displays, particularly in challenging service encounters, are at highest risk for emotional exhaustion. The cumulative nature of emotional exhaustion means that workers may initially cope effectively with emotional labor demands but gradually experience declining capacity and satisfaction over time.
Burnout syndrome, encompassing emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment, represents the most severe consequence of problematic emotional labor. Workers experiencing burnout from emotional labor often report complete dissatisfaction with their work and strong intentions to leave their profession. The progression from emotional labor strain to full burnout appears to be influenced by individual coping resources, organizational support, and the availability of recovery opportunities.
Physical Health and Well-being Implications
The consequences of emotional labor extend beyond psychological outcomes to include physical health implications that further influence workplace satisfaction. Chronic emotional labor strain has been associated with various physical health problems including cardiovascular issues, immune system suppression, and sleep disturbances. These physical health consequences create additional barriers to workplace satisfaction and can contribute to increased absenteeism and healthcare costs.
The physiological mechanisms underlying emotional labor’s health effects involve chronic stress responses activated by ongoing emotion regulation efforts. The effort required to maintain inauthentic emotional displays or to consistently modify emotional experiences creates sustained physiological activation that can damage health over time. Workers who experience significant emotional labor strain often report fatigue, headaches, and other stress-related physical symptoms that interfere with job performance and satisfaction.
Sleep quality and recovery processes are particularly affected by emotional labor demands, with workers often reporting difficulty “switching off” from work-related emotional demands. The intrusive nature of emotional labor can interfere with recovery processes that are essential for maintaining satisfaction and well-being. Organizations that recognize these broader health implications of emotional labor are better positioned to develop comprehensive approaches to supporting worker well-being.
Performance and Service Quality Effects
The relationship between emotional labor and job performance is complex, with different emotional labor strategies showing different associations with performance outcomes. While effective emotional labor is essential for service quality, the strain associated with excessive or poorly managed emotional labor can undermine performance and contribute to reduced workplace satisfaction. Workers experiencing emotional labor strain often struggle to maintain consistent service quality, creating additional stress and satisfaction problems.
Authentic emotional labor and genuine emotion expression typically enhance both service quality and workplace satisfaction, creating positive cycles where good performance reinforces job satisfaction. Customers respond positively to authentic positive emotions, providing feedback that can enhance worker satisfaction and motivation. However, when workers must consistently engage in surface acting or face overwhelming emotional demands, service quality may suffer as emotional resources become depleted.
The spillover effects of emotional labor strain can affect broader job performance beyond direct service delivery. Workers experiencing emotional exhaustion from emotional labor may show reduced creativity, problem-solving ability, and cooperation with colleagues. These broader performance effects can create additional sources of job dissatisfaction and contribute to negative workplace climates that affect entire work teams.
Organizational Interventions and Management Strategies
Selection and Placement Strategies
Effective management of emotional labor begins with careful attention to selection and placement processes that consider the emotional demands of service positions and candidates’ suitability for emotional labor requirements. Organizations that explicitly assess emotional intelligence, acting ability, and comfort with interpersonal interaction during selection typically achieve better fit between workers and emotional labor demands. This improved fit contributes to higher workplace satisfaction by reducing the likelihood of significant person-job mismatches regarding emotional requirements.
Realistic job previews that accurately communicate emotional labor demands help candidates make informed decisions about their suitability for service positions. When candidates understand the emotional aspects of jobs, they are better prepared to manage these demands and less likely to experience satisfaction problems due to unmet expectations. Organizations that provide honest information about emotional labor requirements often see reduced early turnover and higher long-term satisfaction among workers who choose to accept positions.
Person-job fit assessment should consider not only technical qualifications but also alignment between personal values and organizational display rules. Workers whose personal values align with the emotions they are required to express typically experience higher satisfaction and better performance. This alignment facilitates genuine emotion expression and reduces the psychological strain associated with inauthentic emotional displays.
Training and Development Programs
Comprehensive training programs that address emotional labor skills and strategies can significantly improve workplace satisfaction by helping workers develop effective approaches to managing emotional demands. Effective programs typically include components on emotional intelligence development, stress management techniques, and specific strategies for managing difficult service encounters. Training that helps workers understand the nature of emotional labor and develop personal strategies for managing emotional demands shows positive effects on satisfaction and well-being.
Emotion regulation training that teaches workers various strategies for managing their emotional experiences can reduce reliance on problematic surface acting while developing more effective deep acting skills. Such training often includes techniques from cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness practices, and stress inoculation training. Workers who develop broader repertoires of emotion regulation strategies typically show better adaptation to emotional labor demands and higher workplace satisfaction.
Ongoing support and refresher training help maintain the benefits of initial emotional labor training and address emerging challenges. The dynamic nature of service work means that workers face new emotional challenges throughout their careers, requiring continuous development and support. Organizations that provide ongoing emotional labor training typically see sustained benefits in terms of worker satisfaction and service quality.
Organizational Culture and Climate
Creating organizational cultures that support healthy emotional labor represents a comprehensive approach to managing emotional labor consequences and enhancing workplace satisfaction. Supportive cultures acknowledge the legitimate costs and challenges of emotional labor while providing resources and recognition for effective emotional work. Such cultures typically emphasize authenticity, employee well-being, and sustainable approaches to service delivery.
Leadership practices that model appropriate emotional expression and demonstrate concern for employee emotional well-being contribute to positive emotional labor climates. Leaders who acknowledge the difficulty of emotional labor, provide emotional support during challenging periods, and recognize excellent emotional performance help create environments where workers feel valued and supported. This support is crucial for maintaining satisfaction in emotionally demanding service environments.
Policies and practices that protect workers from excessive emotional demands and provide recovery opportunities are essential for sustainable emotional labor management. This includes appropriate break schedules, limits on exposure to particularly difficult service encounters, and support services for workers experiencing emotional strain. Organizations that proactively address emotional labor demands typically achieve better long-term satisfaction and retention outcomes.
Future Directions and Emerging Considerations
Technology and Digital Service Delivery
The increasing digitization of service delivery creates new contexts for emotional labor that may significantly affect workplace satisfaction in service professions. Digital communication channels, including chat systems, video conferencing, and social media interactions, create new forms of emotional labor that may have different psychological demands and satisfaction implications than traditional face-to-face service encounters. Understanding how emotional labor operates in digital contexts represents an important frontier for research and practice.
Artificial intelligence and automation technologies may alter the nature of emotional labor by changing which aspects of service delivery require human emotional management. As routine service tasks become automated, remaining human service roles may become more emotionally intensive, requiring workers to manage increasingly complex emotional demands. This evolution may require new approaches to emotional labor training and support to maintain workplace satisfaction in transformed service roles.
The boundary between work and personal life may become increasingly blurred as service delivery becomes more digitally mediated and temporally distributed. This blurring may create new challenges for emotional labor management and recovery, requiring innovative approaches to protecting worker well-being and satisfaction in evolving service environments.
Cross-Cultural and Global Considerations
The globalization of service industries creates increasing needs for understanding how cultural factors influence emotional labor and its relationship with workplace satisfaction. Different cultures have varying norms regarding appropriate emotional expression, interpersonal interaction styles, and service delivery approaches. These cultural differences may significantly affect how workers experience emotional labor demands and their associated satisfaction implications.
Cross-cultural research on emotional labor is revealing important differences in emotional labor strategies, their effectiveness, and their relationships with satisfaction outcomes. Understanding these cultural variations is crucial for multinational service organizations seeking to maintain consistent service quality while supporting worker well-being across diverse cultural contexts. Future research must examine how global service organizations can balance universal emotional labor principles with local cultural expectations and preferences.
Conclusion
The extensive body of research on emotional labor and workplace satisfaction in service professions has established emotional labor as a critical factor influencing employee experiences across diverse service industries. The evidence clearly demonstrates that how workers manage emotional demands significantly affects their satisfaction, well-being, and performance, with different emotional labor strategies showing markedly different relationships with positive outcomes. Surface acting consistently emerges as problematic for workplace satisfaction, while deep acting and genuine emotion expression show more positive associations, particularly when supported by appropriate organizational resources and individual capabilities.
The complexity of emotional labor-satisfaction relationships requires nuanced approaches to understanding and managing emotional demands in service professions. Individual differences in personality characteristics, emotional competence, and values significantly moderate these relationships, while occupational and organizational factors create varying contexts that influence how emotional labor affects satisfaction. This complexity suggests that effective management of emotional labor requires tailored approaches rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.
The consequences of poorly managed emotional labor extend beyond immediate job satisfaction to include broader implications for physical health, psychological well-being, and service quality. These broader consequences highlight the importance of proactive approaches to emotional labor management that recognize the legitimate costs and challenges associated with emotional work. Organizations that acknowledge these challenges and provide appropriate support typically achieve better outcomes in terms of both employee satisfaction and service effectiveness.
Practical applications of emotional labor research have yielded evidence-based strategies for enhancing workplace satisfaction while maintaining service quality. These strategies include careful attention to selection and placement processes, comprehensive training programs that develop emotional regulation skills, and organizational cultures that support healthy approaches to emotional labor. The success of these interventions depends on sustained organizational commitment and recognition that emotional labor represents a legitimate form of work that requires appropriate resources and support.
Future research and practice in emotional labor must address emerging challenges related to technological change, cultural diversity, and evolving service delivery models. As service industries continue to evolve, new forms of emotional labor may emerge that require innovative approaches to maintaining worker satisfaction and well-being. The fundamental recognition that emotions constitute a form of work that can be both rewarding and depleting will remain relevant as service professions adapt to changing contexts and demands.
References
- Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1993). Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 88-115. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.3997508
- Brotheridge, C. M., & Grandey, A. A. (2002). Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of “people work”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(1), 17-39. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1815
- Brotheridge, C. M., & Lee, R. T. (2003). Development and validation of the Emotional Labour Scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903769647229
- Diefendorff, J. M., Croyle, M. H., & Gosserand, R. H. (2005). The dimensionality and antecedents of emotional labor strategies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 339-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.02.001
- Diefendorff, J. M., & Richard, E. M. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of emotional display rule perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.284
- Glomb, T. M., & Tews, M. J. (2004). Emotional labor: A conceptualization and scale development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00038-1
- Gosserand, R. H., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2005). Emotional display rules and emotional labor: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1256-1264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1256
- Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95
- Grandey, A. A. (2003). When “the show must go on”: Surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040678
- Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
- Hulsheger, U. R., & Schewe, A. F. (2011). On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: A meta-analysis of three decades of research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(3), 361-389. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022876
- Johnson, H. A. M., & Spector, P. E. (2007). Service with a smile: Do emotional intelligence, gender, and autonomy moderate the emotional labor process? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(4), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.319
- Judge, T. A., Woolf, E. F., & Hurst, C. (2009). Is emotional labor more difficult for some than for others? A multilevel, experience-sampling study. Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 57-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01129.x
- Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 986-1010. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9704071861
- Pugliesi, K. (1999). The consequences of emotional labor: Effects on work stress, job satisfaction, and well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 23(2), 125-154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021329112679
- Wharton, A. S. (1993). The affective consequences of service work: Managing emotions on the job. Work and Occupations, 20(2), 205-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888493020002004
- Zapf, D. (2002). Emotion work and psychological well-being: A review of the literature and some conceptual considerations. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 237-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00048-7
- Zerbe, W. J. (2000). Emotional dissonance and employee well-being. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. E. Hartel, & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 189-214). Quorum Books.