psychology.iresearchnet.com

iResearchNet

Psychology » Psychology Articles » I-O Psychology Articles » Employee Assistance Programs as a Strategic Tool for Enhancing Workplace Well-Being

Employee Assistance Programs as a Strategic Tool for Enhancing Workplace Well-Being

Employee Assistance Programs have evolved from basic support services into sophisticated strategic tools that organizations leverage to enhance workplace well-being and organizational effectiveness. This comprehensive analysis examines how Employee Assistance Programs function as strategic organizational interventions, focusing on their role in promoting mental health, reducing workplace stress, and improving overall employee well-being. The strategic implementation of Employee Assistance Programs involves alignment with organizational goals, integration with human resource management systems, and systematic evaluation of outcomes to demonstrate return on investment. Contemporary research demonstrates that strategically designed Employee Assistance Programs contribute significantly to reducing absenteeism, improving productivity, enhancing employee engagement, and supporting organizational resilience. This article synthesizes current evidence on the strategic value of Employee Assistance Programs while examining implementation frameworks, measurement approaches, and best practices for maximizing program effectiveness. The findings indicate that Employee Assistance Programs, when strategically positioned and effectively managed, serve as critical components of comprehensive workplace well-being initiatives that benefit both employees and organizations.

Introduction

The strategic positioning of Employee Assistance Programs within organizational frameworks represents a fundamental shift from viewing these services as reactive employee benefits to recognizing them as proactive investments in human capital and organizational performance (Sharar & Lennox, 2014). Modern organizations increasingly recognize that employee well-being directly impacts productivity, engagement, retention, and overall organizational success, making Employee Assistance Programs essential components of strategic human resource management. This strategic perspective requires organizations to design, implement, and evaluate Employee Assistance Programs with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and alignment with broader organizational goals.

The business case for Employee Assistance Programs as strategic tools is supported by extensive research demonstrating their impact on key organizational metrics including healthcare costs, absenteeism, turnover, and workplace safety (Richmond et al., 2017). Organizations that strategically implement Employee Assistance Programs report significant returns on investment, with studies indicating cost-benefit ratios ranging from 3:1 to 7:1 across different industries and organizational contexts. This evidence base has transformed organizational perspectives on Employee Assistance Programs from optional employee benefits to strategic necessities for maintaining competitive advantage in knowledge-based economies.

Strategic Employee Assistance Programs implementation requires sophisticated understanding of organizational culture, employee demographics, workplace stressors, and business objectives to ensure program design aligns with specific organizational needs and contexts (Attridge, 2019). The most effective Employee Assistance Programs are those that integrate seamlessly with existing organizational systems while addressing unique challenges and opportunities within specific work environments. This strategic approach demands collaboration between Employee Assistance Programs professionals, human resource leaders, and organizational executives to ensure program sustainability and continuous improvement.

Strategic Framework for Employee Assistance Programs Implementation

Organizational Assessment and Needs Analysis

Strategic Employee Assistance Programs implementation begins with comprehensive organizational assessment to identify specific workplace stressors, employee demographics, organizational culture characteristics, and existing support resources (Csiernik, 2011). This assessment process involves systematic data collection through employee surveys, focus groups, organizational records analysis, and stakeholder interviews to develop detailed understanding of program requirements and implementation context. Effective needs assessments examine both current employee problems and potential risk factors that could impact future organizational performance and employee well-being.

The organizational assessment process for Employee Assistance Programs must consider industry-specific factors, regulatory requirements, geographic considerations, and organizational size to ensure program design appropriately addresses unique contextual variables (Burke & Richardson, 2014). For example, Employee Assistance Programs in healthcare organizations may emphasize trauma and compassion fatigue support, while programs in manufacturing settings might focus on substance abuse prevention and workplace safety. Understanding these contextual factors enables organizations to design Employee Assistance Programs that directly address priority concerns while maximizing resource utilization and program effectiveness.

Data-driven needs assessment for Employee Assistance Programs involves analysis of existing organizational metrics including absenteeism rates, healthcare utilization patterns, workers’ compensation claims, employee turnover statistics, and performance indicators (McPherson et al., 2010). This quantitative analysis provides baseline measures for program evaluation while identifying specific areas where Employee Assistance Programs interventions may have greatest impact. Organizations should also examine external benchmarking data to understand industry standards and best practices for Employee Assistance Programs implementation.

Stakeholder engagement during the assessment phase ensures that Employee Assistance Programs design reflects input from diverse organizational constituencies including employees, supervisors, union representatives, and executive leadership (Googins & Godfrey, 2017). This collaborative approach builds organizational support for Employee Assistance Programs while ensuring that program design addresses legitimate concerns and expectations from different stakeholder groups. Effective stakeholder engagement also facilitates program promotion and utilization by creating organizational champions who advocate for Employee Assistance Programs services.

Program Design and Service Integration

Strategic Employee Assistance Programs design requires careful consideration of service delivery models, technology platforms, staffing approaches, and integration mechanisms with existing organizational systems (Herlihy et al., 2016). Organizations must choose between internal Employee Assistance Programs models, external contractor arrangements, or hybrid approaches based on organizational size, resources, expertise requirements, and confidentiality considerations. Each model presents distinct advantages and challenges that must be evaluated against specific organizational needs and constraints.

Service integration represents a critical component of strategic Employee Assistance Programs implementation, requiring coordination with human resource information systems, benefits administration, occupational health programs, and workplace wellness initiatives (Berry et al., 2010). Integrated Employee Assistance Programs eliminate service duplication while creating comprehensive support networks that address multiple dimensions of employee well-being simultaneously. This integration requires sophisticated information management systems that maintain confidentiality while enabling appropriate coordination and referral mechanisms.

Technology integration has become increasingly important for strategic Employee Assistance Programs implementation, with organizations leveraging digital platforms to enhance service accessibility, data collection, outcome measurement, and program promotion (Reardon et al., 2019). Modern Employee Assistance Programs utilize mobile applications, web-based portals, artificial intelligence chatbots, and telehealth platforms to expand service delivery options while maintaining confidentiality and convenience. These technological capabilities enable Employee Assistance Programs to serve diverse employee populations across different geographic locations and work arrangements.

Quality assurance mechanisms must be built into Employee Assistance Programs design to ensure consistent service delivery, appropriate clinical standards, and continuous improvement capabilities (Maiden, 2019). Strategic Employee Assistance Programs include regular program audits, clinical supervision protocols, outcome measurement systems, and feedback mechanisms that enable ongoing program refinement and optimization. These quality assurance processes protect both employees and organizations while supporting program credibility and effectiveness.

Employee Assistance Programs Impact on Organizational Outcomes

Mental Health and Psychological Well-Being

Strategic Employee Assistance Programs implementation has demonstrated significant positive impacts on employee mental health outcomes, with research indicating reduced rates of depression, anxiety, stress-related disorders, and suicidal ideation among program participants (Joyce et al., 2016). These mental health improvements translate directly into organizational benefits including reduced healthcare costs, decreased absenteeism, improved workplace relationships, and enhanced job performance. Employee Assistance Programs provide early intervention services that prevent minor mental health concerns from developing into more serious conditions requiring intensive treatment.

The mental health benefits of Employee Assistance Programs extend beyond individual employees to impact organizational culture and workplace climate through reduced stigma, increased help-seeking behaviors, and improved supervisor-employee relationships (Harvey et al., 2014). Organizations with well-established Employee Assistance Programs report higher levels of psychological safety, increased disclosure of mental health concerns, and greater willingness among employees to seek help for personal problems. This cultural shift creates more supportive work environments that promote overall well-being and organizational resilience.

Employee Assistance Programs mental health interventions include crisis response services, short-term counseling, psychiatric referrals, and preventive educational programs that address diverse mental health needs across different employee populations (Giga et al., 2008). Strategic Employee Assistance Programs design ensures that mental health services are culturally competent, trauma-informed, and evidence-based to maximize effectiveness while meeting diverse employee needs. These programs also coordinate with community mental health resources to provide comprehensive support networks for employees requiring extended treatment.

Measurement of mental health outcomes from Employee Assistance Programs requires sophisticated evaluation approaches that respect confidentiality while documenting program impact through validated assessment instruments, longitudinal studies, and organizational outcome metrics (Sharar et al., 2009). Organizations track indicators such as healthcare utilization patterns, prescription medication usage, disability claims, and employee satisfaction surveys to assess Employee Assistance Programs effectiveness in promoting mental health and psychological well-being.

Workplace Productivity and Performance Enhancement

Employee Assistance Programs contribute significantly to workplace productivity enhancement through multiple pathways including reduced presenteeism, improved focus and concentration, better decision-making capabilities, and enhanced interpersonal relationships (Goetzel et al., 2014). Research demonstrates that employees who utilize Employee Assistance Programs services show measurable improvements in job performance ratings, goal achievement, and task completion rates compared to non-users. These productivity gains result from addressing personal problems that interfere with work performance and providing employees with coping strategies and resources for managing workplace stressors.

The impact of Employee Assistance Programs on workplace performance extends to team dynamics and organizational functioning through improved communication, reduced interpersonal conflicts, enhanced collaboration, and increased organizational citizenship behaviors (Blum & Roman, 2015). Employees who receive Employee Assistance Programs support often demonstrate improved emotional regulation, better stress management skills, and increased resilience in facing workplace challenges. These individual improvements contribute to more effective work teams and improved organizational climate.

Employee Assistance Programs productivity benefits are particularly pronounced in high-stress occupations and industries where personal problems can have significant safety and performance implications (Bober & Regehr, 2006). Healthcare workers, first responders, transportation employees, and other safety-sensitive positions benefit substantially from Employee Assistance Programs services that address trauma exposure, shift work challenges, and occupational stress. Strategic Employee Assistance Programs for these populations include specialized services and proactive interventions that prevent performance deterioration and safety incidents.

Quantitative measurement of Employee Assistance Programs productivity impact requires sophisticated methodologies that isolate program effects from other organizational variables while accounting for selection bias and confounding factors (Attridge, 2012). Organizations employ various measurement approaches including controlled studies, pre-post comparisons, matched control groups, and econometric analyses to document Employee Assistance Programs contributions to productivity enhancement. These evaluation efforts provide evidence for continued program investment and refinement.

Return on Investment and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Financial Benefits and Cost Savings

Strategic Employee Assistance Programs generate substantial financial returns through reduced healthcare costs, decreased absenteeism, lower turnover rates, reduced workers’ compensation claims, and improved productivity levels (Baicker et al., 2010). Comprehensive cost-benefit analyses of Employee Assistance Programs consistently demonstrate positive returns on investment, with organizations typically saving $3-7 for every dollar invested in program services. These financial benefits result from both direct cost reductions and indirect productivity improvements that impact organizational profitability and competitiveness.

Healthcare cost reductions represent a primary source of Employee Assistance Programs financial benefits, with studies indicating 20-30% reductions in medical expenses among program participants compared to non-users (Sharar & White, 2015). Employee Assistance Programs achieve these savings through early intervention services that prevent minor problems from requiring expensive medical treatment, appropriate referral to cost-effective community resources, and improved management of chronic health conditions. Mental health and substance abuse services provided through Employee Assistance Programs are particularly cost-effective compared to traditional healthcare delivery models.

Absenteeism reduction represents another significant source of Employee Assistance Programs financial benefits, with organizations reporting 25-50% decreases in unscheduled absences among program participants (Richmond et al., 2017). These improvements result from Employee Assistance Programs assistance with personal problems that cause work disruption, stress management interventions that improve overall resilience, and crisis intervention services that help employees manage acute difficulties without extended work absence. The financial value of absenteeism reduction varies by industry and position but typically represents substantial cost savings for organizations.

Turnover reduction through Employee Assistance Programs generates significant cost savings by reducing recruitment, selection, training, and productivity loss expenses associated with employee replacement (Kurtz et al., 2018). Employee Assistance Programs help retain valuable employees by addressing personal problems that might otherwise lead to job departure, improving job satisfaction through support services, and demonstrating organizational commitment to employee welfare. The financial benefits of turnover reduction are particularly significant for positions requiring extensive training or possessing specialized skills.

Measurement and Evaluation Frameworks

Comprehensive Employee Assistance Programs evaluation requires sophisticated measurement frameworks that capture both quantitative outcomes and qualitative impacts while maintaining appropriate confidentiality protections (Csiernik et al., 2006). Organizations employ multiple evaluation approaches including utilization analysis, outcome studies, return on investment calculations, and stakeholder satisfaction assessments to document program effectiveness and guide continuous improvement efforts. These evaluation frameworks must balance measurement rigor with practical implementation constraints and confidentiality requirements.

Utilization metrics provide foundational data for Employee Assistance Programs evaluation, including participation rates, service types accessed, demographic characteristics of users, and referral patterns (Maiden, 2018). Strategic analysis of utilization data enables organizations to identify program strengths and gaps while informing marketing and service delivery improvements. Utilization tracking also supports capacity planning and resource allocation decisions that optimize program effectiveness and efficiency.

Outcome measurement for Employee Assistance Programs involves tracking changes in key organizational metrics including healthcare costs, absenteeism rates, turnover statistics, safety incidents, and productivity indicators among program participants (McPherson et al., 2019). These outcome studies require careful research design to establish causal relationships between Employee Assistance Programs participation and organizational improvements while accounting for confounding variables and selection bias. Longitudinal tracking enables organizations to assess both short-term and long-term impacts of Employee Assistance Programs interventions.

Return on investment calculations for Employee Assistance Programs require comprehensive cost accounting that includes program administration expenses, service delivery costs, and organizational overhead while quantifying financial benefits through reduced healthcare costs, absenteeism savings, turnover reduction, and productivity improvements (Sharar et al., 2009). These analyses must employ conservative assumptions and rigorous methodologies to ensure credibility while providing actionable information for program management and organizational decision-making.

Implementation Strategies and Best Practices

Leadership Engagement and Organizational Support

Successful strategic implementation of Employee Assistance Programs requires strong leadership commitment and organizational support at all levels, from executive sponsors to front-line supervisors (Burke & Richardson, 2014). Leadership engagement involves not only financial investment in Employee Assistance Programs but also active promotion of services, modeling of help-seeking behaviors, and integration of program goals with broader organizational objectives. Organizations with strong leadership support for Employee Assistance Programs typically achieve higher utilization rates and better outcomes than those with limited management commitment.

Executive leadership plays a critical role in Employee Assistance Programs success by establishing program priorities, allocating necessary resources, and communicating organizational commitment to employee well-being (Googins & Godfrey, 2017). Strategic Employee Assistance Programs implementation requires executive champions who understand program value and advocate for continued investment and development. These leaders must also ensure that Employee Assistance Programs align with organizational culture and values while supporting broader human resource management strategies.

Supervisor training represents an essential component of strategic Employee Assistance Programs implementation, as front-line managers serve as primary referral sources and program ambassadors (Herlihy et al., 2016). Effective supervisor training programs teach managers how to recognize employee problems, make appropriate referrals to Employee Assistance Programs, maintain confidentiality, and support employees during treatment and recovery. Well-trained supervisors significantly increase Employee Assistance Programs utilization while ensuring that referrals are appropriate and timely.

Middle management support for Employee Assistance Programs requires ongoing education about program benefits, regular communication about service availability, and clear expectations for program promotion and utilization (Maiden, 2019). Organizations must address potential supervisor concerns about productivity loss, confidentiality issues, and liability considerations while providing practical guidance for supporting employees who access Employee Assistance Programs services. Strong middle management support creates organizational cultures that normalize help-seeking and reduce stigma associated with program utilization.

Communication and Program Promotion

Strategic Employee Assistance Programs promotion requires comprehensive communication campaigns that utilize multiple channels and messages to reach diverse employee populations while maintaining confidentiality and reducing stigma (Joyce et al., 2016). Effective promotion strategies combine traditional approaches such as newsletters and posters with digital communications including email campaigns, intranet portals, and social media platforms. These campaigns must balance program visibility with sensitivity to employee privacy concerns and cultural considerations.

Program promotion messages for Employee Assistance Programs should emphasize accessibility, confidentiality, and practical benefits while addressing common barriers to utilization such as stigma, time constraints, and skepticism about program effectiveness (Harvey et al., 2014). Successful communication campaigns use diverse formats including testimonials, case studies, educational content, and interactive presentations to engage different learning styles and communication preferences. These messages must be culturally appropriate and available in multiple languages to serve diverse workforce populations.

Marketing strategies for Employee Assistance Programs should target specific employee segments with tailored messages that address unique needs and concerns of different demographic groups (Giga et al., 2008). For example, programs might develop specialized campaigns for younger employees focusing on career development and work-life balance, while targeting older workers with messages about caregiving support and retirement planning. These targeted approaches increase program relevance and utilization among diverse employee populations.

Communication timing for Employee Assistance Programs plays a critical role in program success, with organizations needing to provide regular reminders about service availability while capitalizing on teachable moments such as organizational changes, critical incidents, or awareness campaigns (Reardon et al., 2019). Strategic communication plans include both proactive ongoing promotion and reactive crisis communication protocols that help employees access appropriate support during difficult periods. These timing considerations ensure that Employee Assistance Programs remain visible and accessible when employees need them most.

Conclusion

Employee Assistance Programs have emerged as indispensable strategic tools for enhancing workplace well-being and organizational effectiveness in contemporary business environments. The evidence presented throughout this analysis demonstrates that strategically implemented Employee Assistance Programs generate substantial returns on investment through improved employee mental health, enhanced productivity, reduced healthcare costs, and strengthened organizational resilience. Organizations that view Employee Assistance Programs as strategic investments rather than optional benefits position themselves for sustained competitive advantage in increasingly complex and demanding work environments.

The strategic value of Employee Assistance Programs extends beyond individual employee support to encompass broader organizational outcomes including culture transformation, risk mitigation, and stakeholder satisfaction. Modern Employee Assistance Programs serve as catalysts for creating psychologically safe work environments that promote innovation, collaboration, and high performance while addressing emerging workplace challenges such as remote work stress, technological disruption, and changing employee expectations. This strategic positioning requires sophisticated program design, implementation, and evaluation approaches that align with organizational goals and demonstrate measurable value.

Future development of Employee Assistance Programs as strategic tools will likely emphasize increased integration with digital health platforms, artificial intelligence applications, predictive analytics capabilities, and personalized intervention approaches that maximize program effectiveness and efficiency. Organizations must continue investing in Employee Assistance Programs infrastructure, professional development, and evaluation systems to ensure these programs remain relevant and effective in addressing evolving workforce needs and organizational challenges. The evidence base supporting Employee Assistance Programs strategic value will continue growing as evaluation methodologies become more sophisticated and organizational commitment to employee well-being intensifies.

The transformation of Employee Assistance Programs from reactive support services to proactive strategic tools represents a fundamental shift in organizational approaches to human capital management and workplace well-being. This evolution reflects growing recognition that employee welfare and organizational success are inextricably linked, requiring comprehensive approaches that address both individual needs and organizational objectives. Organizations that successfully leverage Employee Assistance Programs as strategic tools will be better positioned to attract and retain talent, manage workplace challenges, and achieve sustainable business success in dynamic competitive environments.

References

  1. Attridge, M. (2012). Employee assistance programs: Evidence for effectiveness. In R. J. Gatchel & I. Z. Schultz (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health and wellness (pp. 439-461). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4839-6_22
  2. Attridge, M. (2019). A global perspective on promoting workplace mental health and the role of employee assistance programs. American Journal of Health Promotion, 33(4), 622-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117118817482
  3. Baicker, K., Cutler, D., & Song, Z. (2010). Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Affairs, 29(2), 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0626
  4. Berry, L. L., Mirabito, A. M., & Baun, W. B. (2010). What’s the hard return on employee wellness programs? Harvard Business Review, 88(12), 104-112.
  5. Blum, T. C., & Roman, P. M. (2015). The Oxford handbook of work and organization. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199337538.013.22
  6. Bober, T., & Regehr, C. (2006). Strategies for reducing secondary or vicarious trauma: Do they work? Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 6(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/brief-treatment/mhj001
  7. Burke, R. J., & Richardson, A. M. (2014). Corporate wellness programs: Linking employee and organizational health. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/978178254060
  8. Csiernik, R. (2011). The glass is filling: An examination of employee assistance program evaluations in the first decade of the new millennium. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 26(4), 334-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2011.625939
  9. Csiernik, R., Datti, P. A., & Adams, J. (2006). Evaluation of an employee assistance program at a transportation company. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 21(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1300/J022v21n02_01
  10. Giga, S. I., Noblet, A. J., Faragher, B., & Cooper, C. L. (2008). The UK perspective: A review of research on organisational stress management interventions. Australian Psychologist, 38(2), 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060310001707167
  11. Goetzel, R. Z., Henke, R. M., Tabrizi, M., Pelletier, K. R., Loeppke, R., Ballard, D. W., … & White, J. (2014). Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work? Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(9), 927-934. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000211
  12. Googins, B. K., & Godfrey, J. (2017). Occupational social work: A developmental perspective. Journal of Social Work Practice, 31(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2016.1174972
  13. Harvey, S. B., Milligan-Saville, J. S., Paterson, H. M., Harkness, E. L., Marsh, A. M., Dobson, M., … & Henderson, M. (2014). The mental health of fire-fighters: An examination of the impact of repeated trauma exposure. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 50(7), 649-658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867415615217
  14. Herlihy, P. A., Sharar, D. A., McPherson, T. L., Jacobson, J. M., & Cacciola, J. S. (2016). The development of a taxonomy of employee assistance program clinical encounters. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 31(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2015.1074053
  15. Joyce, S., Modini, M., Christensen, H., Mykletun, A., Bryant, R., Mitchell, P. B., & Harvey, S. B. (2016). Workplace interventions for common mental disorders: A systematic meta-review. Psychological Medicine, 46(4), 683-697. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291715002408
  16. Kurtz, L. R., Zavala, S. K., Bragg, A., & McMillan, E. (2018). Employee assistance program participation and employment retention. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 33(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2018.1464930
  17. Maiden, R. P. (2018). Global perspectives of occupational social work and employee assistance programmes: A comparative analysis. Australian Social Work, 71(4), 408-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2018.1477030
  18. Maiden, R. P. (2019). Employee assistance programmes and work-life effectiveness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315168913
  19. McPherson, T. L., Goplerud, E., Olufokunbi-Sam, D., Jacobus-Kantor, L., Walsh, L., & Curtiss, L. (2010). State strategies to expand and sustain comprehensive workplace alcohol and drug programs. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 37(4), 394-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-009-9190-x
  20. McPherson, T. L., Kaplan, L. M., Huynh, T. N., Huang, C. C., & Nguyen, T. (2019). Workplace-based employee assistance program alcohol interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61(1), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001476
  21. Reardon, J., Williams, N. L., & Ziemer, K. S. (2019). Technology-enhanced employee assistance programs: Current applications and future directions. Journal of Employee Assistance, 49(3), 24-27.
  22. Richmond, M. K., Pampel, F. C., Wood, R. C., & Nunes, A. P. (2017). The impact of employee assistance services on workplace outcomes: Results of a prospective, quasi-experimental study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(2), 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000018
  23. Sharar, D. A., & Lennox, R. (2014). Implementation and evaluation of employee assistance programmes and workplace counselling: A systematic review. Journal of Public Mental Health, 13(2), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-11-2013-0096
  24. Sharar, D. A., Pompe, J. C., & Lennox, R. D. (2009). Evaluating the workplace effects of EAP counseling. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 24(3), 336-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240903188372
  25. Sharar, D. A., & White, W. L. (2015). The shrinking of EAP core technology: An unwarranted compression. Employee Assistance Report, 18(9), 1-3.