psychology.iresearchnet.com

iResearchNet

Psychology » Psychology Articles » I-O Psychology Articles » Employee Well-Being Programs and Their Impact on Job Satisfaction

Employee Well-Being Programs and Their Impact on Job Satisfaction

Employee well-being programs have emerged as critical organizational interventions designed to enhance worker health, satisfaction, and performance. This comprehensive review examines the relationship between employee well-being programs and job satisfaction within the framework of industrial-organizational psychology. The analysis encompasses theoretical foundations, empirical evidence, and practical applications of these programs across various organizational contexts. Research demonstrates that comprehensive well-being initiatives significantly influence job satisfaction through multiple pathways, including improved physical and mental health outcomes, enhanced work-life balance, and increased organizational support perceptions. Meta-analytic findings reveal moderate to strong positive correlations between program participation and satisfaction measures. However, program effectiveness varies based on implementation quality, organizational culture, and individual participant characteristics. The evidence supports the strategic value of employee well-being programs as both humanitarian investments and performance enhancement tools. Future research directions include longitudinal studies examining causal mechanisms and the development of personalized intervention approaches.

Introduction

The contemporary workplace has witnessed a paradigmatic shift toward recognizing employee well-being as a fundamental driver of organizational success and individual fulfillment. Industrial-organizational psychology has increasingly focused on understanding how workplace interventions can enhance both employee welfare and organizational outcomes simultaneously. Employee well-being programs represent systematic organizational efforts to support worker health, happiness, and performance through comprehensive interventions addressing physical, mental, social, and financial dimensions of well-being.

The theoretical foundations of employee well-being programs draw from multiple psychological frameworks, including self-determination theory, conservation of resources theory, and positive psychology principles. Self-determination theory posits that individuals have fundamental needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, which when satisfied, promote well-being and intrinsic motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2017). Conservation of resources theory suggests that individuals strive to obtain, retain, and protect resources, with stress occurring when resources are threatened or depleted (Hobfoll, 2011). These theoretical perspectives provide crucial insights into how organizational interventions can support employee well-being and, consequently, job satisfaction.

Job satisfaction, defined as an individual’s evaluative judgment about their work experience, represents one of the most extensively studied constructs in organizational psychology. Locke’s (1976) pioneering work established job satisfaction as a pleasurable emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job as achieving or facilitating the achievement of job values. Contemporary conceptualizations recognize job satisfaction as a multifaceted construct encompassing satisfaction with work tasks, supervision, compensation, coworkers, and organizational policies. The relationship between employee well-being programs and job satisfaction has gained considerable empirical attention as organizations seek evidence-based approaches to enhance workforce satisfaction and performance.

The growing emphasis on employee well-being programs reflects broader societal trends toward holistic approaches to health and wellness, increased awareness of mental health issues, and evolving employee expectations regarding organizational support. Organizations increasingly recognize that traditional benefit packages may be insufficient to address contemporary workforce needs and expectations. This recognition has prompted the development of comprehensive well-being initiatives that extend beyond basic health insurance to encompass mental health support, work-life balance programs, financial wellness resources, and personal development opportunities.

Historical Development and Theoretical Framework

The evolution of employee well-being programs can be traced through several distinct phases, each reflecting changing societal values and organizational priorities. Early workplace wellness initiatives emerged during the industrial revolution, primarily focusing on occupational safety and basic health protections for workers in hazardous environments. These early efforts were largely regulatory responses to dangerous working conditions rather than comprehensive well-being interventions. The post-World War II era witnessed the expansion of employer-sponsored health benefits, laying the groundwork for more comprehensive employee support systems.

The 1980s marked a significant turning point with the emergence of employee assistance programs and workplace health promotion initiatives. Organizations began recognizing the potential for proactive interventions to reduce healthcare costs and improve productivity. Johnson & Johnson’s landmark wellness program, initiated in 1979, demonstrated significant returns on investment and inspired widespread adoption of similar initiatives across various industries (Henke et al., 2011). These early programs primarily focused on physical health outcomes, including smoking cessation, weight management, and cardiovascular health improvement.

The theoretical framework underlying modern employee well-being programs draws extensively from positive psychology principles, which emphasize the promotion of positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and achievement. Seligman’s (2011) PERMA model provides a comprehensive framework for understanding well-being dimensions that organizational interventions can target. Positive psychology’s emphasis on flourishing rather than merely addressing dysfunction has influenced the development of strengths-based approaches to employee development and well-being enhancement. This theoretical shift has expanded program scope beyond traditional health promotion to include elements such as resilience training, mindfulness interventions, and character strengths development.

Conservation of resources theory offers another crucial theoretical lens for understanding how employee well-being programs influence job satisfaction. According to this theory, individuals are motivated to obtain, retain, and protect resources, which include objects, personal characteristics, conditions, and energies (Hobfoll, 2011). Employee well-being programs can be conceptualized as organizational resources that help employees build and maintain personal resources necessary for effective job performance and satisfaction. When organizations provide comprehensive well-being support, employees experience reduced resource depletion and enhanced resource accumulation, leading to improved job satisfaction and performance outcomes.

Social exchange theory provides additional theoretical support for the relationship between employee well-being programs and job satisfaction. This theory suggests that employment relationships involve reciprocal exchanges of resources, with employees contributing effort and commitment in exchange for organizational support and rewards (Cropanzano & Mitchell, 2005). Employee well-being programs represent tangible expressions of organizational support, fostering positive exchange relationships and enhancing employees’ affective and normative commitment to their organizations. This theoretical perspective explains why comprehensive well-being programs often result in improved job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and reduced turnover intentions.

Program Components and Implementation Strategies

Contemporary employee well-being programs encompass multiple interconnected components designed to address diverse aspects of employee welfare and satisfaction. Physical health initiatives typically include comprehensive health screenings, preventive care programs, on-site fitness facilities, nutrition counseling, and chronic disease management support. These programs aim to improve employee health outcomes while reducing healthcare costs and absenteeism. Research demonstrates that physical health programs can significantly impact job satisfaction by improving energy levels, reducing stress, and enhancing overall quality of life (Conn et al., 2009). The integration of wearable technology and health tracking applications has enhanced program engagement and effectiveness by providing personalized feedback and goal-setting opportunities.

Mental health components have gained increasing prominence as organizations recognize the prevalence and impact of psychological distress on workplace performance and satisfaction. Employee assistance programs provide confidential counseling services, crisis intervention, and referral resources for employees experiencing personal or work-related challenges. Stress management workshops, mindfulness training, and resilience building programs offer proactive approaches to mental health promotion. Research indicates that mental health interventions can significantly improve job satisfaction by reducing psychological distress, enhancing coping skills, and promoting positive emotional states (Lamontagne et al., 2014). The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated organizational investment in mental health resources, with many companies expanding access to teletherapy services and mental health applications.

Work-life balance initiatives represent another critical component of comprehensive well-being programs, addressing the challenges employees face in managing competing demands from work and personal life. Flexible work arrangements, including remote work options, flexible scheduling, and compressed work weeks, allow employees greater control over their time and energy allocation. Dependent care support, including childcare assistance, elder care resources, and family leave policies, helps employees manage caregiving responsibilities without compromising their job performance or satisfaction. Research consistently demonstrates that work-life balance programs enhance job satisfaction by reducing work-family conflict and increasing perceived organizational support (Allen et al., 2013).

Financial wellness programs address the growing concern about financial stress and its impact on employee well-being and job performance. These programs typically include financial planning workshops, retirement counseling, debt management resources, and emergency assistance funds. Student loan repayment assistance and financial coaching services help employees address specific financial challenges that may impact their job satisfaction and career decisions. Studies indicate that financial stress significantly affects job satisfaction and productivity, making financial wellness programs valuable components of comprehensive well-being initiatives (Kim et al., 2018). The integration of financial wellness with other program components creates synergistic effects that enhance overall program effectiveness.

Professional development and career wellness components focus on employees’ growth, learning, and career advancement opportunities. Mentoring programs, skills training workshops, tuition reimbursement, and career coaching services help employees develop professionally while enhancing their job satisfaction and organizational commitment. These programs address intrinsic motivation factors identified in self-determination theory, particularly the needs for competence and autonomy. Research demonstrates that professional development opportunities significantly predict job satisfaction and reduce turnover intentions across various organizational contexts (Dysvik & Kuvaas, 2008). The integration of career development with other well-being components creates comprehensive support systems that address multiple dimensions of employee satisfaction.

Empirical Evidence and Research Findings

Extensive empirical research has examined the relationship between employee well-being programs and job satisfaction, providing substantial evidence for positive associations across various organizational contexts and program types. Meta-analytic reviews have consistently demonstrated moderate to strong correlations between program participation and job satisfaction measures, with effect sizes ranging from .30 to .50 depending on program characteristics and implementation quality (Parks & Steelman, 2008). These findings suggest that employee well-being programs represent effective interventions for enhancing job satisfaction, though the magnitude of effects varies based on multiple factors including program comprehensiveness, organizational support, and participant engagement levels.

Longitudinal studies have provided valuable insights into the temporal relationships between program implementation and satisfaction outcomes. Baicker et al. (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis of workplace wellness programs and found significant improvements in job satisfaction measures over time, with the most substantial gains occurring after 12-18 months of program participation. These findings suggest that the benefits of employee well-being programs may require sustained participation to achieve maximum impact on job satisfaction. Additionally, longitudinal research has revealed that program effects tend to be more pronounced among employees with initially lower satisfaction levels, indicating that well-being programs may be particularly beneficial for addressing satisfaction deficits.

Cross-sectional studies have examined the relationship between specific program components and job satisfaction outcomes, revealing differential effects across program types. Physical health programs demonstrate consistent but modest correlations with job satisfaction, primarily through improved energy levels and reduced absenteeism. Mental health interventions show stronger associations with satisfaction measures, particularly among employees experiencing high stress levels or psychological distress (Richardson & Rothstein, 2008). Work-life balance programs exhibit some of the strongest correlations with job satisfaction, especially among employees with significant caregiving responsibilities or those in demanding job roles. These differential effects highlight the importance of tailoring program components to address specific employee needs and organizational contexts.

International research has provided insights into cultural and contextual factors that influence the effectiveness of employee well-being programs on job satisfaction. Studies conducted in European organizations have demonstrated that comprehensive well-being programs may have stronger effects on job satisfaction in countries with strong social safety nets, possibly due to complementary effects between organizational and societal support systems (Bakker & Schaufeli, 2008). Research in Asian organizational contexts has revealed that well-being programs emphasizing collective activities and social support may be more effective than individually focused interventions, reflecting cultural values regarding group harmony and social relationships. These cross-cultural findings underscore the importance of adapting program design and implementation to align with local cultural values and expectations.

Industry-specific research has revealed variations in program effectiveness across different organizational sectors and job types. Healthcare organizations have demonstrated particularly strong relationships between well-being programs and job satisfaction, possibly due to the high-stress nature of healthcare work and the relevance of health-focused interventions. Technology companies have found that programs emphasizing work-life balance and professional development show stronger associations with satisfaction outcomes than traditional health-focused programs. Manufacturing organizations have reported success with comprehensive programs that include both physical safety components and broader wellness initiatives. These industry-specific findings highlight the importance of tailoring program design to address sector-specific challenges and employee needs.

Mechanisms and Mediating Processes

The relationship between employee well-being programs and job satisfaction operates through multiple psychological and organizational mechanisms that have been identified through empirical research and theoretical analysis. Perceived organizational support represents one of the most significant mediating mechanisms, as comprehensive well-being programs signal organizational commitment to employee welfare and create positive exchange relationships. When employees perceive that their organization cares about their well-being, they experience increased positive affect toward their work and organization, leading to enhanced job satisfaction (Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002). This mechanism is particularly powerful because it addresses fundamental human needs for care and support within the workplace context.

Stress reduction serves as another crucial mediating pathway through which employee well-being programs influence job satisfaction. Comprehensive programs that address multiple stressors, including health concerns, financial worries, and work-life conflicts, help employees develop better coping resources and reduce overall stress levels. Lower stress is associated with improved mood, increased energy, and greater capacity for job engagement, all of which contribute to enhanced job satisfaction (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2007). The stress reduction mechanism is particularly relevant for programs that include mental health components, mindfulness training, and work-life balance initiatives, as these directly target stress-related factors that can undermine job satisfaction.

Resource building and conservation mechanisms explain how employee well-being programs enhance job satisfaction by helping employees develop and maintain psychological, physical, and social resources necessary for effective job performance. According to conservation of resources theory, individuals with greater resource reserves experience less stress and more positive outcomes when facing workplace challenges. Employee well-being programs contribute to resource building by providing health improvements, skill development opportunities, social support networks, and financial security (Hobfoll, 2011). Employees with stronger resource profiles report higher job satisfaction because they feel more capable of meeting job demands and achieving their goals.

Self-efficacy enhancement represents an important mechanism through which certain types of well-being programs influence job satisfaction. Programs that include skill development, health improvement, and personal growth components can increase employees’ confidence in their ability to handle job challenges and achieve desired outcomes. Higher self-efficacy is consistently associated with greater job satisfaction because employees with strong efficacy beliefs approach work tasks with confidence and persistence (Bandura, 2006). This mechanism is particularly relevant for programs that include professional development, stress management training, and health behavior change components, as these directly target skills and capabilities that enhance workplace effectiveness.

Social support and relationship building mechanisms explain how employee well-being programs that emphasize group activities, team challenges, and community building can enhance job satisfaction through improved workplace relationships. Programs that create opportunities for positive social interactions among coworkers can strengthen social bonds, increase workplace friendship formation, and enhance team cohesion. Strong workplace relationships are consistently associated with higher job satisfaction because they provide emotional support, practical assistance, and positive social experiences (Chiaburu & Harrison, 2008). This mechanism highlights the importance of designing well-being programs that include social components rather than focusing exclusively on individual interventions.

Implementation Challenges and Best Practices

The successful implementation of employee well-being programs requires careful attention to numerous organizational and individual factors that can influence program effectiveness and impact on job satisfaction. Leadership commitment and support represent fundamental prerequisites for successful program implementation, as senior management’s visible endorsement signals organizational priority and legitimizes employee participation. Research demonstrates that programs with strong leadership support achieve higher participation rates and greater satisfaction outcomes compared to initiatives that lack executive commitment (Goetzel & Ozminkowski, 2008). Leaders must not only provide financial resources but also model program participation and integrate well-being goals into organizational strategy and performance management systems.

Communication and marketing strategies significantly influence program awareness, participation, and effectiveness in enhancing job satisfaction. Effective communication approaches utilize multiple channels, provide clear information about program benefits, and address potential barriers to participation. Organizations that employ comprehensive communication strategies, including launch events, ongoing reminders, success stories, and feedback mechanisms, achieve higher participation rates and stronger satisfaction outcomes (Mattke et al., 2013). Communication messages should emphasize both individual benefits and organizational commitment to employee welfare, creating positive associations between program participation and job satisfaction enhancement.

Program design and customization challenges require organizations to balance comprehensive offerings with targeted interventions that address specific employee needs and preferences. One-size-fits-all approaches often fail to achieve maximum impact on job satisfaction because they may not address the diverse needs and interests of different employee groups. Successful programs utilize needs assessments, demographic analyses, and employee feedback to design targeted interventions that resonate with specific populations (Pronk, 2014). Customization strategies may include offering different program tracks for different employee groups, providing menu-style benefit options, or implementing phased rollouts that allow for program refinement based on participant feedback.

Measurement and evaluation challenges involve developing comprehensive assessment strategies that capture both program processes and outcomes related to job satisfaction. Many organizations struggle to implement rigorous evaluation designs that can demonstrate causal relationships between program participation and satisfaction improvements. Effective evaluation strategies utilize multiple measurement approaches, including pre-post comparisons, control group designs, and longitudinal tracking of key outcomes (Aldana, 2001). Organizations should establish baseline measures of job satisfaction and well-being indicators before program implementation and conduct regular follow-up assessments to track progress and identify areas for improvement.

Technology integration challenges involve selecting and implementing digital platforms that enhance program accessibility, engagement, and effectiveness without creating additional barriers for employees. Modern well-being programs increasingly rely on mobile applications, wearable devices, online platforms, and data analytics to deliver personalized interventions and track participant progress. However, technology solutions must be user-friendly, secure, and accessible to all employees regardless of their technological proficiency (Lewis et al., 2016). Organizations should provide adequate training and support to ensure that technology enhances rather than impedes program participation and satisfaction outcomes.

Future Directions and Implications

The field of employee well-being programs continues to evolve rapidly, with emerging trends and research directions offering new opportunities to enhance program effectiveness and impact on job satisfaction. Personalization and precision approaches represent a significant frontier, with organizations increasingly utilizing data analytics, artificial intelligence, and individual assessment tools to deliver customized interventions that address specific employee needs and preferences. Future research should examine how personalized program approaches influence job satisfaction outcomes compared to traditional one-size-fits-all interventions. The development of sophisticated matching algorithms and predictive models may enable organizations to optimize program components for individual employees, potentially enhancing both participation rates and satisfaction outcomes.

Technology integration and digital health innovations continue to transform employee well-being program delivery and effectiveness. Virtual reality applications for stress reduction and mindfulness training, artificial intelligence-powered coaching systems, and advanced biometric monitoring devices offer new possibilities for enhancing program engagement and impact. Research examining the effectiveness of these emerging technologies on job satisfaction outcomes remains limited, presenting important opportunities for future investigation (Maeng et al., 2017). Organizations should carefully evaluate new technologies for their potential to enhance rather than complicate employee well-being program experiences.

Global and cultural adaptation research represents an increasingly important area as organizations expand internationally and employ diverse workforces. Future studies should examine how cultural values, societal norms, and local contexts influence the effectiveness of different program components on job satisfaction across various international settings. The development of culturally sensitive program models and implementation strategies may be crucial for achieving consistent satisfaction outcomes across diverse organizational contexts. Research should also examine how remote work trends and distributed workforce models influence program design and effectiveness requirements.

Sustainability and long-term impact studies are needed to understand how employee well-being programs maintain their effectiveness on job satisfaction over extended periods. Many existing studies focus on short-term outcomes, leaving questions about program sustainability and long-term benefits largely unanswered. Future research should examine factors that contribute to sustained program effectiveness, including participant engagement strategies, program evolution approaches, and organizational culture development. Longitudinal studies tracking job satisfaction outcomes over multiple years could provide valuable insights into the enduring effects of comprehensive well-being initiatives.

Integration with broader organizational systems represents another important area for future development and research. Employee well-being programs may achieve greater impact on job satisfaction when integrated with performance management, talent development, diversity and inclusion, and organizational culture initiatives. Future research should examine how system-level integration approaches influence program effectiveness and identify best practices for creating comprehensive organizational support systems. The development of integrated approaches may require new theoretical frameworks and measurement strategies that capture complex interactions between multiple organizational interventions and job satisfaction outcomes.

Conclusion

The extensive body of research examining employee well-being programs and their impact on job satisfaction provides compelling evidence for the value of comprehensive organizational investments in employee welfare. Empirical findings consistently demonstrate positive associations between program participation and job satisfaction outcomes, with effect sizes that are both statistically significant and practically meaningful. The theoretical foundations underlying these relationships, including self-determination theory, conservation of resources theory, and social exchange theory, provide robust explanations for why and how well-being programs enhance employee satisfaction and organizational outcomes.

The evidence supports a multifaceted understanding of program effectiveness, highlighting the importance of comprehensive approaches that address physical health, mental health, work-life balance, financial wellness, and professional development dimensions simultaneously. Programs that integrate multiple components and address diverse employee needs demonstrate stronger associations with job satisfaction than narrow, single-focus interventions. This finding emphasizes the value of holistic approaches to employee well-being that recognize the interconnected nature of various life domains and their collective impact on workplace satisfaction.

Implementation challenges and best practices research reveals the critical importance of organizational commitment, effective communication, customized program design, and rigorous evaluation strategies for achieving maximum impact on job satisfaction. Organizations that approach well-being programs as strategic investments rather than peripheral benefits achieve better outcomes and stronger returns on investment. The successful integration of employee well-being programs into broader organizational systems and culture represents a key factor in achieving sustained improvements in job satisfaction and organizational performance.

Future research directions offer exciting possibilities for advancing both theoretical understanding and practical applications of employee well-being programs. The development of personalized interventions, integration of emerging technologies, cross-cultural adaptation strategies, and long-term sustainability approaches represent important frontiers for enhancing program effectiveness. As organizations continue to recognize the strategic value of employee well-being, the field will likely witness continued innovation in program design, implementation, and evaluation approaches.

The implications for industrial-organizational psychology practice are substantial, as employee well-being programs represent evidence-based interventions that can simultaneously enhance individual welfare and organizational performance. Practitioners should advocate for comprehensive, well-designed programs that address multiple dimensions of employee well-being while maintaining rigorous evaluation standards to demonstrate impact on job satisfaction and other key outcomes. The continued evolution of this field promises to yield even more effective approaches for supporting employee well-being and enhancing job satisfaction in diverse organizational contexts.

References

  1. Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012
  2. Aldana, S. G. (2001). Financial impact of health promotion programs: A comprehensive review of the literature. American Journal of Health Promotion, 15(5), 296-320. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-15.5.296
  3. Baicker, K., Cutler, D., & Song, Z. (2010). Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Affairs, 29(2), 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0626
  4. Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.515
  5. Bandura, A. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Information Age Publishing.
  6. Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1082-1103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082
  7. Conn, V. S., Hafdahl, A. R., Cooper, P. S., Brown, L. M., & Lusk, S. L. (2009). Meta-analysis of workplace physical activity interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(4), 330-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.008
  8. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
  9. Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2008). The relationship between perceived training opportunities, work motivation and employee outcomes. International Journal of Training and Development, 12(3), 138-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2008.00301.x
  10. Goetzel, R. Z., & Ozminkowski, R. J. (2008). The health and cost benefits of work site health-promotion programs. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 303-323. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090930
  11. Henke, R. M., Goetzel, R. Z., McHugh, J., & Isaac, F. (2011). Recent experience in health promotion at Johnson & Johnson: Lower health spending, strong return on investment. Health Affairs, 30(3), 490-499. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0806
  12. Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02016.x
  13. Kim, J., Garman, E. T., & Sorhaindo, B. (2018). Relationships among credit counseling clients’ financial wellbeing, financial behaviors, financial stressor events, and health. Financial Counseling and Planning, 14(2), 75-87.
  14. Lamontagne, A. D., Keegel, T., Louie, A. M., Ostry, A., & Landsbergis, P. A. (2014). A systematic review of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature, 1990-2005. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 13(3), 268-280. https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.2007.13.3.268
  15. Lewis, C. C., Klasnja, P., Powell, B. J., Lyon, A. R., Tuzzio, L., Jones, S., Walsh-Bailey, C., & Weiner, B. (2016). From classification to causality: Advancing understanding of mechanisms of change in implementation science. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 136. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00136
  16. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1349). Rand McNally.
  17. Maeng, D. D., Pitcavage, J. M., DiFilippo, A. J., & Tomcavage, J. F. (2017). The association between workplace wellness program participation and medical costs and utilization in a large multistate health plan. Population Health Management, 20(5), 399-405. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2016.0122
  18. Mattke, S., Liu, H., Caloyeras, J. P., Huang, C. Y., Van Busum, K. R., Khodyakov, D., & Shier, V. (2013). Workplace wellness programs study. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR254
  19. Parks, K. M., & Steelman, L. A. (2008). Organizational wellness programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(1), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.58
  20. Pronk, N. P. (2014). Best practice design principles of worksite health and wellness programs. ACSM’s Health & Fitness Journal, 18(1), 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1249/FIT.0000000000000019
  21. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
  22. Richardson, G. E., & Rothstein, H. R. (2008). Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(1), 69-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.69
  23. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
  24. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press.
  25. Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204