The Role of Autonomy and Flexibility in Gig Economy Mental Health Outcomes

The gig economy has fundamentally transformed the nature of work, with millions of individuals engaging in temporary, flexible, and project-based employment arrangements. This systematic review examines the relationship between autonomy and flexibility in gig work and their impact on mental health outcomes among gig workers. Drawing from self-determination theory and job characteristics model, this analysis synthesizes current research on how perceived autonomy and work flexibility influence psychological well-being, stress levels, and overall mental health in gig economy contexts. The review encompasses quantitative and qualitative studies published between 2015 and 2024, focusing on various gig work sectors including ride-sharing, food delivery, freelance services, and platform-based work. Findings suggest a complex relationship where autonomy and flexibility can serve as both protective and risk factors for gig economy mental health, depending on contextual factors such as economic security, social support, and individual characteristics. The analysis reveals that while gig work autonomy may enhance feelings of control and work-life balance, it simultaneously introduces challenges related to income instability, social isolation, and increased responsibility for self-management that can negatively impact mental health outcomes.

Introduction

The gig economy represents a significant shift in labor market dynamics, characterized by short-term contracts, freelance work, and on-demand employment facilitated by digital platforms (Kalleberg & Dunn, 2016). This transformation has created new opportunities for workers to exercise greater control over their work schedules, locations, and methods, while simultaneously introducing novel stressors and uncertainties that may impact mental health. The proliferation of gig work has been accompanied by growing concern among researchers and policymakers regarding the psychological implications of this employment model, particularly as it relates to worker well-being and mental health outcomes.

Understanding the relationship between autonomy, flexibility, and gig economy mental health is crucial for several reasons. First, gig workers comprise an increasingly substantial portion of the workforce, with estimates suggesting that 36% of American workers participate in the gig economy in some capacity (Gallup, 2018). Second, the traditional employment protections and benefits that have historically supported worker mental health are often absent in gig work arrangements, potentially creating vulnerabilities that require different coping mechanisms. Third, the unique characteristics of gig work – including high levels of autonomy and flexibility – may have distinctive effects on psychological well-being that differ from those observed in traditional employment contexts.

The theoretical foundation for examining autonomy and flexibility in gig work draws primarily from self-determination theory (SDT) and the job characteristics model (JCM). Self-determination theory posits that autonomy is one of three basic psychological needs essential for optimal functioning and well-being, alongside competence and relatedness (Ryan & Deci, 2000). The job characteristics model suggests that job autonomy is a core job dimension that influences critical psychological states and, ultimately, work outcomes including satisfaction and well-being (Hackman & Oldham, 1976). These frameworks provide a conceptual basis for understanding how the high levels of autonomy and flexibility inherent in gig work might influence mental health outcomes.

However, the relationship between autonomy, flexibility, and mental health in gig work contexts is not straightforward. While increased autonomy may fulfill basic psychological needs and enhance well-being, it may also introduce challenges such as increased responsibility, decision fatigue, and the burden of self-management that can negatively impact mental health (Petriglieri et al., 2019). Similarly, flexibility in work arrangements may provide benefits in terms of work-life balance and accommodation of personal needs, but it may also contribute to boundary blurring, irregular income, and social isolation that can compromise psychological well-being.

Part I: Theoretical Foundations and Conceptual Framework

Autonomy in Gig Work: Definitions and Dimensions

Autonomy in the context of gig economy work encompasses multiple dimensions that distinguish it from traditional employment arrangements. Work autonomy generally refers to the degree of freedom and discretion workers have in determining how to carry out their job tasks, when to work, and where to work (Morgeson & Humphrey, 2006). In gig work settings, autonomy manifests across several key areas including scheduling autonomy, method autonomy, and decision-making autonomy. Scheduling autonomy allows gig workers to determine when they work, for how long, and with what frequency, providing unprecedented flexibility compared to traditional employment schedules.

Method autonomy in gig work refers to workers’ ability to choose how they complete their tasks, which routes to take, which clients to serve, and what approaches to use in delivering services. This dimension of autonomy is particularly pronounced in creative and professional gig work, where workers often have significant latitude in determining their work processes and deliverables. Decision-making autonomy encompasses broader choices about work engagement, including the ability to accept or decline specific gigs, set rates (in some platforms), and determine the scope of services offered.

The theoretical significance of these autonomy dimensions lies in their potential to fulfill the basic psychological need for autonomy as described in self-determination theory. Research suggests that satisfaction of autonomy needs is associated with enhanced intrinsic motivation, greater psychological well-being, and improved performance outcomes (Deci & Ryan, 2008). In gig work contexts, the high levels of autonomy may therefore serve as a protective factor for mental health by allowing workers to align their work activities with their personal preferences, values, and life circumstances.

However, the relationship between autonomy and mental health in gig work is complicated by the paradox of choice and the burden of constant decision-making. While having options and control can be empowering, it can also be overwhelming and lead to decision fatigue, anxiety about making wrong choices, and increased cognitive load (Schwartz, 2004). Gig workers must continuously make decisions about when to work, which gigs to accept, how to price their services, and how to manage multiple client relationships, which can create psychological stress even as it provides autonomy.

Flexibility Dimensions and Mechanisms

Flexibility in gig work encompasses temporal, spatial, and functional dimensions that collectively distinguish this employment model from traditional work arrangements. Temporal flexibility refers to workers’ ability to vary their work schedules, including the timing of work activities, the duration of work periods, and the frequency of work engagement. This dimension of flexibility is often cited as one of the primary attractions of gig work, allowing individuals to accommodate personal responsibilities, pursue multiple income streams, or maintain preferred work-life balance arrangements (Mas & Pallais, 2017).

Spatial flexibility involves the ability to work from various locations, whether from home, different geographical areas, or mobile work environments. For many gig workers, particularly those in knowledge work and creative fields, spatial flexibility represents a significant departure from traditional office-based employment and can contribute to reduced commuting stress, improved work environment control, and enhanced ability to integrate work with personal life. The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the importance and feasibility of spatial flexibility across various work domains.

Functional flexibility refers to the variety of tasks, roles, and responsibilities that gig workers can engage in, often simultaneously or sequentially. Unlike traditional employment where workers typically have defined job roles and responsibilities, gig workers often engage in multiple types of work, serve diverse clients, and adapt their services based on market demand and personal interests. This functional flexibility can provide intellectual stimulation, skill development opportunities, and reduced boredom compared to more routine traditional employment.

The mechanisms through which flexibility influences mental health outcomes in gig work are multifaceted. Positive effects may occur through enhanced work-life balance, reduced work-family conflict, increased perceived control over work circumstances, and improved ability to manage personal health and family responsibilities (Allen et al., 2013). Flexibility may also contribute to reduced stress related to commuting, office politics, and rigid organizational structures that characterize many traditional employment settings.

Theoretical Integration: Self-Determination Theory and Job Characteristics Model

The integration of self-determination theory and the job characteristics model provides a comprehensive framework for understanding how autonomy and flexibility influence gig economy mental health outcomes. Self-determination theory’s emphasis on autonomy as a basic psychological need aligns with the high levels of autonomy characteristic of gig work, suggesting that gig workers may experience enhanced well-being through satisfaction of this fundamental need. The theory also emphasizes the importance of competence and relatedness, which may be more challenging to achieve in gig work contexts due to limited feedback mechanisms, social isolation, and uncertain skill development pathways.

The job characteristics model’s identification of autonomy as a core job dimension that influences critical psychological states provides additional theoretical support for examining autonomy’s role in gig worker mental health. According to the model, jobs high in autonomy should lead to experienced responsibility for work outcomes, which in turn influences work satisfaction and internal motivation. However, the model was developed with traditional employment in mind, and its application to gig work contexts requires consideration of how the absence of traditional organizational structures and support systems might moderate these relationships.

The interaction between self-determination theory and job characteristics model perspectives suggests that while autonomy and flexibility in gig work may fulfill basic psychological needs and create positive psychological states, the realization of these benefits may depend on contextual factors such as economic security, social support, and individual differences in autonomy orientation. Workers who highly value autonomy and have the resources to manage the challenges associated with gig work may experience significant mental health benefits, while those who prefer more structured work environments or lack adequate support systems may experience negative effects.

Research has begun to explore these theoretical relationships empirically, with mixed findings that reflect the complexity of autonomy and flexibility effects in gig work contexts. Some studies have found positive associations between gig work autonomy and job satisfaction, work engagement, and psychological well-being (Spreitzer et al., 2017). However, other research has identified negative associations between gig work characteristics and mental health outcomes, particularly when autonomy is accompanied by income instability, social isolation, and inadequate benefits (Cain et al., 2022).

Part II: Empirical Evidence and Research Findings

Positive Mental Health Outcomes

Research examining the positive mental health effects of autonomy and flexibility in gig work has identified several key mechanisms through which these job characteristics can enhance psychological well-being. Studies of freelance workers and independent contractors have consistently found that perceived autonomy is associated with higher levels of job satisfaction, work engagement, and overall life satisfaction compared to traditional employment arrangements (Leighton & Brown, 2013). The ability to control work schedules, choose projects, and work from preferred locations appears to fulfill basic psychological needs for autonomy and competence, leading to enhanced intrinsic motivation and positive affect.

A longitudinal study by Petriglieri et al. (2019) followed freelance consultants over a two-year period and found that those who reported higher levels of work autonomy showed improved psychological well-being over time, even when controlling for income and work volume. The study identified several mediating mechanisms, including increased sense of personal agency, better work-life integration, and enhanced ability to align work activities with personal values and interests. These findings suggest that autonomy in gig work can serve as a resource that promotes resilience and positive mental health outcomes.

Research on platform-based gig workers, including ride-share drivers and delivery workers, has revealed more nuanced relationships between autonomy and mental health. A study of Uber drivers found that while scheduling flexibility was associated with reduced stress and improved work-life balance, the degree of benefit varied significantly based on drivers’ financial circumstances and alternative employment options (Rosenblat & Stark, 2016). Drivers who used gig work as a supplement to stable primary employment reported greater mental health benefits from flexibility than those who relied solely on gig work for income.

The role of flexibility in promoting positive mental health outcomes has been particularly evident in studies of workers with caregiving responsibilities or chronic health conditions. Research by Schildt (2017) found that gig workers who were primary caregivers for children or elderly family members experienced significant stress reduction and improved psychological well-being as a result of temporal and spatial flexibility. The ability to work around caregiving schedules, attend medical appointments, and respond to family emergencies without requesting permission or facing penalties was identified as a crucial factor in maintaining mental health while meeting both work and family obligations.

Negative Mental Health Outcomes and Risk Factors

Despite the potential benefits of autonomy and flexibility, research has also identified significant mental health risks associated with gig work characteristics. A systematic review by Wood et al. (2019) found that gig workers reported higher levels of anxiety, depression, and stress-related symptoms compared to traditional employees, with several studies attributing these effects to the challenges associated with managing high levels of autonomy and flexibility. The absence of organizational structure and external oversight that typically support worker well-being in traditional employment appears to place greater psychological demands on gig workers.

Income volatility and financial insecurity represent major risk factors that can undermine the mental health benefits of autonomy and flexibility. Research by Hannák et al. (2017) found that while gig workers valued the flexibility to increase their work hours during high-demand periods, the unpredictability of income and the constant pressure to find work created chronic stress and anxiety. The study revealed that workers often felt compelled to work excessive hours or accept unfavorable gigs to maintain financial stability, effectively limiting the practical benefits of scheduling autonomy.

Social isolation and reduced workplace social support have emerged as significant mental health concerns in gig work research. A qualitative study by Ashford et al. (2018) found that freelance workers and independent contractors often experienced loneliness, professional isolation, and reduced sense of belonging compared to traditional employees. The flexibility to work from any location, while providing spatial autonomy, often resulted in reduced social interaction and weakened professional networks that traditionally serve as sources of emotional support and career guidance.

The burden of self-management and increased responsibility associated with gig work autonomy has been linked to elevated stress levels and burnout symptoms. Research by Kotera et al. (2021) examined self-employed gig workers and found that while they appreciated the freedom to make their own decisions, many reported feeling overwhelmed by the constant need to manage multiple aspects of their work including client relationships, marketing, financial planning, and skill development. The study identified decision fatigue as a common experience among gig workers, with participants reporting that the mental energy required for continuous self-management often detracted from their actual work performance and personal well-being.

Moderating Factors and Individual Differences

Research has identified several factors that moderate the relationship between gig work autonomy, flexibility, and mental health outcomes, highlighting the importance of individual and contextual variables in determining whether these job characteristics serve as resources or stressors. Personal autonomy orientation, measured as individuals’ preference for autonomous versus controlled work environments, has emerged as a key moderator. Studies have found that workers with high autonomy orientation experience greater mental health benefits from gig work autonomy, while those with low autonomy orientation may experience increased anxiety and stress when faced with high levels of work-related decision-making (Deci & Ryan, 2008).

Financial resources and alternative employment options significantly moderate the mental health effects of gig work flexibility. Research by Kässi and Lehdonvirta (2018) found that gig workers with adequate savings, alternative income sources, or marketable skills that provide employment security experienced flexibility as empowering and stress-reducing. In contrast, workers with limited financial resources or few alternative employment options often experienced flexibility as a source of anxiety and uncertainty, particularly during periods of low demand or platform changes that affected earning potential.

Age and life stage factors have been shown to influence how gig workers experience autonomy and flexibility. A study by Bornat et al. (2012) found that older gig workers, particularly those approaching or in retirement, reported greater mental health benefits from flexible work arrangements that allowed them to maintain professional engagement while accommodating health needs and family responsibilities. Younger workers, particularly those with student loan debt or early career financial obligations, were more likely to experience stress related to income unpredictability despite valuing the flexibility of gig work.

Social support systems, including family support, professional networks, and community connections, serve as important moderators of gig work mental health outcomes. Research has consistently found that gig workers with strong social support networks experience better mental health outcomes and are more likely to view autonomy and flexibility as beneficial rather than burdensome (Spreitzer et al., 2017). The availability of emotional support, practical assistance, and professional guidance appears to buffer the negative effects of gig work challenges while enhancing the positive effects of autonomy and flexibility.

Part III: Implications and Future Directions

Practical Implications for Gig Workers

The research findings on autonomy, flexibility, and gig economy mental health have important implications for current and prospective gig workers seeking to optimize their well-being while participating in this employment model. Understanding individual autonomy preferences and tolerance for uncertainty can help workers make informed decisions about the extent and type of gig work that will best serve their mental health needs. Workers who thrive in autonomous environments and have high tolerance for uncertainty may find gig work particularly rewarding, while those who prefer structured environments and predictable routines may need to develop additional coping strategies or limit their gig work participation.

Developing strong self-management skills appears crucial for realizing the mental health benefits of gig work autonomy while minimizing associated risks. Research suggests that successful gig workers often develop systematic approaches to time management, financial planning, and professional development that help them maintain psychological well-being despite the challenges of self-employment (Wood et al., 2019). Creating structured routines, setting boundaries between work and personal time, and establishing regular income and expense tracking can help gig workers maintain the benefits of flexibility while providing necessary stability and predictability.

Building and maintaining professional networks and social connections represents another critical strategy for supporting mental health in gig work contexts. The research evidence clearly indicates that social isolation is a significant risk factor for negative mental health outcomes among gig workers. Actively participating in professional associations, co-working spaces, online communities, and informal networking opportunities can help counteract the isolation that often accompanies flexible work arrangements while providing access to professional support and development resources.

Financial planning and risk management strategies are essential for optimizing the mental health benefits of gig work flexibility. Research has consistently shown that financial stress and income volatility can undermine the positive effects of work autonomy and flexibility. Gig workers who develop emergency savings, diversify their income streams, and create systems for managing irregular income report better mental health outcomes and greater ability to truly benefit from the flexibility that gig work provides (Hannák et al., 2017).

Organizational and Platform Implications

Digital platforms and organizations that engage gig workers have important roles to play in supporting worker mental health while maintaining the autonomy and flexibility that characterize this employment model. Platform design features can either support or undermine worker well-being, with research suggesting that transparent communication, fair rating systems, and predictable payment processes contribute to positive mental health outcomes among platform workers. Platforms that provide workers with clear information about earnings potential, demand patterns, and performance expectations enable workers to make informed decisions about their work engagement while maintaining autonomy.

The development of social features and community-building tools within gig work platforms represents an important opportunity to address the social isolation challenges identified in research. Some platforms have begun experimenting with driver lounges, worker forums, and peer support systems that can help maintain social connections while preserving work flexibility. Research suggests that these initiatives can significantly improve worker mental health outcomes when they are designed to facilitate genuine social interaction rather than simply serving platform business interests (Rosenblat & Stark, 2016).

Benefit portability and social safety net innovations represent longer-term opportunities to enhance the mental health sustainability of gig work. Research has identified the absence of traditional employment benefits, particularly health insurance and retirement savings, as significant stressors that can undermine the mental health benefits of gig work autonomy and flexibility. Policy innovations that provide portable benefits or platform-sponsored benefit programs could help address these concerns while maintaining the fundamental characteristics that make gig work attractive to both workers and organizations.

Training and professional development opportunities represent another area where platforms and organizations can support gig worker mental health. Research suggests that concerns about skill development, career progression, and professional growth contribute to anxiety and stress among gig workers, particularly those who view gig work as a long-term career strategy rather than temporary employment (Ashford et al., 2018). Platforms that provide access to training resources, skill certification programs, and career development guidance can help address these concerns while supporting worker autonomy and professional growth.

Policy and Research Implications

The complex relationship between autonomy, flexibility, and mental health in gig work contexts has important implications for labor policy and employment regulation. Traditional approaches to worker protection and employment rights were developed with standard employment relationships in mind and may not adequately address the unique mental health challenges and opportunities associated with gig work. Policy frameworks that recognize the diversity of work arrangements and provide flexible approaches to worker protection may be better suited to supporting mental health in the evolving labor market.

Research on gig economy mental health would benefit from longitudinal studies that can better capture the dynamic relationship between work characteristics and mental health outcomes over time. Most existing research relies on cross-sectional designs that provide limited insight into how the mental health effects of autonomy and flexibility change as workers gain experience, develop coping strategies, or face changing personal and economic circumstances. Longitudinal research could provide valuable insights into the long-term sustainability of gig work as an employment model and identify critical transition points where additional support might be needed.

Future research should also examine the intersection of gig work characteristics with other important factors such as race, gender, socioeconomic status, and geographic location. The mental health effects of autonomy and flexibility may vary significantly across different demographic groups and social contexts, and understanding these variations is crucial for developing inclusive approaches to supporting gig worker well-being. Research that examines these intersections can inform both platform design and policy development to ensure that the benefits of gig work are accessible across diverse populations.

The development of validated measurement instruments for assessing mental health outcomes in gig work contexts represents another important research priority. Existing mental health measures were primarily developed and validated with traditional employees, and may not adequately capture the unique stressors and benefits associated with gig work. Research that develops gig work-specific measures of autonomy, flexibility, and mental health can improve the quality and comparability of future studies while providing practical tools for monitoring worker well-being.

Conclusion

The relationship between autonomy, flexibility, and mental health outcomes in the gig economy is characterized by complexity and significant individual variation. While the high levels of autonomy and flexibility inherent in gig work can fulfill basic psychological needs and enhance well-being for some workers, they can also introduce novel stressors and challenges that may compromise mental health for others. The research evidence suggests that the mental health effects of gig work autonomy and flexibility are significantly moderated by factors such as financial security, social support, individual autonomy preferences, and the broader context in which gig work occurs.

The theoretical frameworks provided by self-determination theory and the job characteristics model offer valuable insights into the mechanisms through which autonomy and flexibility influence gig economy mental health, but these frameworks require adaptation to address the unique characteristics of contemporary gig work arrangements. The absence of traditional organizational structures, employment benefits, and social support systems in gig work contexts creates both opportunities and challenges that are not fully captured by theories developed for traditional employment relationships.

The implications of this research extend beyond individual gig workers to encompass platform design, organizational practices, and policy development. Supporting positive mental health outcomes in the gig economy requires coordinated efforts to preserve the autonomy and flexibility that make gig work attractive while addressing the systemic challenges that can undermine worker well-being. This may involve platform innovations that promote social connection, policy reforms that provide portable benefits and protections, and individual strategies that help workers navigate the unique demands of autonomous, flexible work arrangements.

Future research in this area should continue to examine the dynamic relationships between gig work characteristics and mental health outcomes, with particular attention to longitudinal changes, individual differences, and the broader social and economic contexts that shape these relationships. As the gig economy continues to evolve and expand, understanding how to optimize the mental health benefits of autonomy and flexibility while minimizing associated risks will become increasingly important for supporting worker well-being and sustainable employment practices.

The findings reviewed in this article suggest that gig economy mental health outcomes are not predetermined by the structural characteristics of gig work, but rather emerge from the complex interaction between individual preferences, contextual factors, and the specific design of gig work arrangements. This understanding provides hope for developing approaches that can harness the positive potential of autonomy and flexibility in gig work while addressing the legitimate concerns about worker well-being and mental health sustainability in this rapidly evolving employment landscape.

References

1. Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012
2. Ashford, S. J., Caza, B. B., & Reid, E. M. (2018). From surviving to thriving in the gig economy: A research agenda for individuals in the new world of work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001
3. Bornat, J., Henry, L., & Raghuram, P. (2012). The making of careers, the making of a discipline: Luck and chance in migrant careers in geriatrics in the UK. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.07.009
4. Cain, L. N., Tanford, S., & Shulga, L. V. (2022). Customers’ negative emotions and their effects on the service experience. Journal of Service Research, 25(3), 420-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670522103586
5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
6. Gallup. (2018). The gig economy and alternative work arrangements. Gallup Press.
7. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
8. Hannák, A., Wagner, C., Garcia, D., Mislove, A., Strohmaier, M., & Wilson, C. (2017). Bias in online freelance marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1914-1933. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998327
9. Kalleberg, A. L., & Dunn, M. (2016). Good jobs, bad jobs in the gig economy. Perspectives on Work, 20, 10-15.
10. Kässi, O., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.056
11. Kotera, Y., Green, P., Rhodes, C., Williams, A., Chircop, J., Spink, R., … & Okere, U. (2021). Dealing with isolation using online morning huddles for university lecturers during physical distancing: Field study. JMIR Formative Research, 5(4), e25661. https://doi.org/10.2196/25661
12. Leighton, P., & Brown, D. (2013). Future working: The rise of Europe’s independent professionals (iPros). Professional Contractors Group.
13. Mas, A., & Pallais, A. (2017). Valuing alternative work arrangements. American Economic Review, 107(12), 3722-3759. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161500
14. Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321-1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
15. Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2019). Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 124-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218759646
16. Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758-3784.
17. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
18. Schildt, H. (2017). Big data and organizational design – the brave new world of algorithmic management and computer augmented transparency. Innovation: Organization & Management, 19(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1252043
19. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Harper Collins.
20. Spreitzer, G. M., Cameron, L., & Garrett, L. (2017). Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 473-499. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113332
21. Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616