Goal achievement coaching represents a specialized, evidence-based approach within coaching psychology that focuses on helping individuals identify, pursue, and accomplish meaningful personal and professional objectives. Drawing on psychological theories of motivation, self-regulation, and behavioral change, goal achievement coaching employs structured methodologies to enhance clients’ clarity, commitment, and capacity to reach desired outcomes. This systematic process involves collaborative goal-setting, action planning, obstacle identification, progress monitoring, and accountability mechanisms that facilitate sustained behavioral change. Research demonstrates that goal achievement coaching produces measurable improvements in goal attainment, self-efficacy, well-being, and performance across diverse populations and contexts. As organizations and individuals increasingly recognize the value of structured goal pursuit, goal achievement coaching has emerged as a vital intervention for enhancing human potential and optimizing performance in academic, corporate, athletic, and personal development domains.
Introduction to Goal Achievement Coaching
Goal achievement coaching has evolved as a distinct specialization within the broader field of coaching psychology, addressing the fundamental human need to pursue and accomplish meaningful objectives. Unlike traditional counseling or therapy, which often focuses on resolving psychological distress or treating mental health conditions, goal achievement coaching adopts a future-oriented, strengths-based approach that helps psychologically healthy individuals bridge the gap between their current reality and desired future state (Grant, 2003). This forward-looking orientation distinguishes goal achievement coaching from remedial interventions and positions it as a performance enhancement methodology applicable across multiple life domains.
The theoretical foundations of goal achievement coaching rest upon several decades of psychological research examining human motivation, goal-setting processes, and self-regulatory mechanisms. Locke and Latham’s goal-setting theory, first articulated in the 1960s and refined over subsequent decades, provides the empirical backbone for understanding how specific, challenging goals lead to higher performance than vague or easy goals (Locke & Latham, 2002). This foundational work established that goals affect performance through four mechanisms: they direct attention and effort toward goal-relevant activities, energize behavior, promote persistence, and encourage the development of task-specific strategies.
Goal achievement coaching integrates these theoretical insights with practical methodologies designed to maximize the probability of successful goal attainment. The coaching process typically involves an ongoing partnership between coach and client, characterized by regular sessions, structured conversations, and systematic progress reviews. Through this collaborative relationship, coaches help clients develop greater self-awareness regarding their values, strengths, and priorities while simultaneously building the skills and strategies necessary for effective goal pursuit.
Historical Development and Theoretical Foundations
The emergence of goal achievement coaching as a recognizable practice domain can be traced to the convergence of several historical trends in psychology and organizational development during the late twentieth century. The human potential movement of the 1960s and 1970s emphasized personal growth and self-actualization, creating cultural receptivity to interventions focused on maximizing human capabilities rather than merely treating deficits. Concurrently, advances in cognitive psychology and social learning theory provided increasingly sophisticated models for understanding how individuals set, pursue, and achieve goals.
Albert Bandura’s social cognitive theory, introduced in the 1970s and 1980s, contributed crucial concepts to goal achievement coaching, particularly the notion of self-efficacy—an individual’s belief in their capacity to execute behaviors necessary to produce specific performance attainments (Bandura, 1997). Bandura demonstrated that self-efficacy beliefs significantly influence which goals people choose to pursue, how much effort they expend, how long they persist in the face of obstacles, and how resilient they prove in response to setbacks. Goal achievement coaches explicitly work to enhance clients’ self-efficacy through mastery experiences, vicarious learning, social persuasion, and physiological state management.
The 1990s witnessed the formalization of coaching as a distinct professional practice, with the establishment of professional organizations such as the International Coach Federation in 1995 and the subsequent development of coach-specific training programs and credentialing systems. During this period, researchers began systematically investigating coaching effectiveness, with Anthony Grant at the University of Sydney emerging as a pioneering figure in establishing coaching psychology as a legitimate academic discipline. Grant’s work emphasized the importance of grounding coaching practice in empirically validated psychological theories and subjecting coaching interventions to rigorous scientific evaluation (Grant & Cavanagh, 2007).
Self-determination theory, developed by Deci and Ryan beginning in the 1980s, provides another crucial theoretical foundation for goal achievement coaching (Ryan & Deci, 2000). This theory distinguishes between intrinsic goals (pursued for inherent satisfaction) and extrinsic goals (pursued for instrumental outcomes) and demonstrates that intrinsic goal pursuit more reliably promotes psychological well-being and sustained motivation. Effective goal achievement coaches help clients identify goals that satisfy fundamental psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, thereby increasing the likelihood of both goal attainment and enhanced well-being.
Core Components of the Goal Achievement Coaching Process
Goal achievement coaching employs a systematic process comprising several essential components, each supported by psychological research and designed to maximize the probability of successful outcomes. While specific coaching models vary in their terminology and emphasis, most incorporate variations of these fundamental elements.
Goal Clarification and Formulation
The initial phase of goal achievement coaching focuses on helping clients develop clear, well-specified goals that align with their core values and genuine aspirations. This process proves more complex than might initially appear, as individuals often begin coaching with vague intentions, conflicting desires, or goals adopted from external sources rather than intrinsic motivation. Coaches employ various techniques to facilitate goal clarity, including values clarification exercises, vision development activities, and structured questioning designed to help clients articulate what they truly want to accomplish and why.
Research consistently demonstrates that goal specificity significantly influences subsequent achievement. Goals framed in concrete, measurable terms—such as “complete a marathon in under four hours by October 2026” rather than “get in better shape”—produce superior outcomes because they provide clearer targets for action and unambiguous criteria for success (Locke & Latham, 2006). The widely recognized SMART framework (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) provides coaches and clients with a practical template for transforming vague aspirations into well-formed goals.
However, contemporary research suggests that optimal goal formulation extends beyond mere specificity to encompass additional dimensions. Goals should be challenging enough to stimulate growth yet realistic enough to maintain motivation and self-efficacy. They should connect to broader life purposes and personal values, as this alignment enhances both motivation and the subjective meaningfulness of goal pursuit. Additionally, goals should balance competing life domains—career, relationships, health, personal development—to prevent the single-minded pursuit of one objective from creating deficits in other important areas.
Action Planning and Strategy Development
Once goals are clearly defined, goal achievement coaching transitions to developing concrete action plans that specify the steps necessary for goal attainment. This planning process involves breaking large, potentially overwhelming goals into smaller, manageable sub-goals and identifying specific behaviors that will move the client progressively toward desired outcomes. Implementation intentions—specific if-then plans that link situational cues with goal-directed responses—represent a particularly powerful planning technique supported by extensive research (Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006).
For example, rather than simply intending to “exercise more regularly,” an implementation intention specifies: “If it is 6:00 AM on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, then I will put on my workout clothes and go to the gym for 45 minutes.” These concrete plans automate decision-making at critical moments, reducing the cognitive burden of initiating goal-directed behaviors and helping individuals override competing impulses or habitual patterns. Goal achievement coaches help clients develop comprehensive implementation intentions that address various scenarios they are likely to encounter.
Strategic planning also involves anticipating obstacles and developing coping strategies before difficulties arise. Mental contrasting, a technique that involves alternating between positive imagery of goal achievement and realistic consideration of potential obstacles, has demonstrated particular effectiveness in promoting goal-directed behavior (Oettingen, 2012). By explicitly identifying potential barriers—time constraints, skill deficits, competing priorities, environmental challenges—and developing specific strategies for navigating these obstacles, clients build resilience and maintain momentum when difficulties inevitably emerge.
Progress Monitoring and Feedback Systems
Systematic tracking of progress toward goals serves multiple psychological functions that enhance achievement likelihood. Regular monitoring increases awareness of current performance relative to desired outcomes, identifies patterns of success and struggle, provides data for strategy refinement, and maintains motivation through visible evidence of advancement. Goal achievement coaches help clients establish appropriate monitoring systems matched to their goals, preferences, and circumstances.
Research indicates that more frequent self-monitoring generally produces better outcomes, though the optimal monitoring frequency depends on goal characteristics and individual differences (Harkin et al., 2016). Some goals benefit from daily tracking—such as dietary intake for someone pursuing weight management—while others may require only weekly or monthly assessment. The key principle is that monitoring frequency should be sufficient to provide meaningful feedback without becoming so burdensome that it undermines sustained engagement.
Technology has dramatically expanded the possibilities for goal progress monitoring, with numerous applications and devices now available for tracking diverse objectives including physical activity, financial management, habit formation, learning progress, and project completion. However, research suggests that the mere presence of monitoring technology does not automatically produce behavioral change; individuals must actively engage with the data, reflect on its implications, and adjust their strategies accordingly. Goal achievement coaches help clients interpret monitoring data, celebrate progress, troubleshoot difficulties, and maintain perspective during plateaus or setbacks.
Accountability Mechanisms
Accountability represents a powerful motivational force in goal achievement coaching. The simple act of committing to goals in the presence of another person and regularly reporting progress creates social pressure that enhances follow-through. Studies examining goal achievement in coaching relationships consistently identify accountability as one of the most valued aspects of the coaching process from clients’ perspectives (Boyce et al., 2010).
The accountability dynamic in goal achievement coaching differs fundamentally from hierarchical accountability in supervisory relationships. Rather than external imposition of consequences for non-performance, coaching accountability operates through voluntary commitment, mutual respect, and the intrinsic desire to honor one’s word. This collaborative form of accountability proves particularly effective because it supports autonomy while simultaneously providing external structure—a combination that satisfies psychological needs identified in self-determination theory.
Coaches employ various techniques to strengthen accountability, including having clients state commitments aloud during sessions, encouraging written documentation of intended actions, scheduling follow-up communications between sessions, and occasionally involving relevant others (with client permission) in the accountability process. The optimal level of accountability structure varies among individuals, with some clients thriving under tight accountability systems while others prefer more flexible arrangements that preserve a greater sense of autonomy.
Evidence-Based Techniques in Goal Achievement Coaching
Contemporary goal achievement coaching draws upon a rich repertoire of evidence-based techniques derived from multiple streams of psychological research. Effective coaches select and adapt these techniques based on client characteristics, goal types, and contextual factors.
Cognitive Restructuring and Mindset Interventions
Self-limiting beliefs and unproductive thought patterns frequently obstruct goal achievement. Cognitive restructuring techniques, adapted from cognitive-behavioral therapy, help clients identify and modify distorted thinking that undermines motivation or performance. Common cognitive distortions addressed in goal achievement coaching include all-or-nothing thinking (“If I can’t do it perfectly, there’s no point in trying”), catastrophizing (“One setback means complete failure”), and limiting beliefs about personal capability (“I’m just not the kind of person who can succeed at this”).
Carol Dweck’s research on growth versus fixed mindsets has profound implications for goal achievement coaching (Dweck, 2006). Individuals with fixed mindsets view abilities as unchangeable traits, leading them to avoid challenges, give up easily in the face of obstacles, and feel threatened by others’ success. In contrast, those with growth mindsets understand abilities as developable through effort and learning, embrace challenges, persist despite setbacks, and find inspiration in others’ achievements. Goal achievement coaches explicitly cultivate growth mindsets by reframing failures as learning opportunities, emphasizing effort and strategy over innate talent, and encouraging clients to view goal pursuit as a developmental journey rather than a test of fixed capacities.
Visualization and Mental Rehearsal
Mental imagery techniques leverage the brain’s capacity to simulate experiences and strengthen neural pathways associated with goal-relevant behaviors. When individuals vividly imagine themselves successfully executing goal-directed actions, they activate many of the same neural regions involved in actual performance, creating a form of mental practice that enhances subsequent real-world execution (Holmes & Collins, 2001). Athletes have long employed visualization techniques, but these methods prove equally applicable to diverse goals including professional presentations, difficult conversations, creative problem-solving, and skill acquisition.
Goal achievement coaches guide clients through structured visualization exercises that engage multiple sensory modalities—seeing, hearing, feeling, and even smelling or tasting elements of the imagined scenario. Effective visualization balances process imagery (seeing oneself executing specific steps toward goal achievement) with outcome imagery (imagining the desired end state). Research indicates that process visualization proves particularly powerful for complex goals requiring multiple steps or novel skills, as it provides mental rehearsal of the actual behaviors necessary for success.
Habit Formation Strategies
Many important goals require sustained behavioral change rather than single actions, making habit formation central to goal achievement coaching. Contemporary research on habit development has revealed principles that coaches can apply to help clients establish lasting behavioral patterns. James Clear’s work synthesizing habit formation research emphasizes four key components: making goal-relevant behaviors obvious (through environmental design and cue management), attractive (by bundling desired behaviors with inherently pleasurable activities), easy (by reducing friction and starting with minimal viable versions), and satisfying (through immediate reinforcement) (Clear, 2018).
The concept of habit stacking—attaching new desired behaviors to existing stable routines—provides a particularly practical strategy for habit formation. For example, a client seeking to develop a daily meditation practice might commit to meditating immediately after their morning coffee, piggybacking the new behavior onto an established routine. This approach leverages existing neural pathways and behavioral momentum while minimizing the cognitive burden of remembering and initiating new behaviors.
Research on habit formation timelines suggests considerable variability in how long establishing new habits requires, with studies showing ranges from 18 to 254 days depending on behavior complexity and individual differences (Lally et al., 2010). Goal achievement coaches help clients maintain realistic expectations about the habit formation process, emphasize consistency over perfection, and develop strategies for recovering quickly from inevitable lapses rather than interpreting temporary disruptions as complete failures.
Applications Across Different Domains
Goal achievement coaching has demonstrated effectiveness across remarkably diverse contexts, with specialized applications emerging for specific populations and goal types.
Corporate and Executive Coaching
Organizations increasingly employ goal achievement coaching to enhance leadership effectiveness, improve employee performance, and facilitate career development. Executive coaches work with senior leaders to clarify strategic priorities, develop leadership capabilities, navigate organizational challenges, and achieve specific business outcomes. Research examining executive coaching effectiveness has documented improvements in goal attainment, leadership behaviors, organizational commitment, and work-life balance (Jones et al., 2016).
The return on investment for organizational coaching programs has attracted considerable research attention, with studies generally documenting positive financial returns that exceed program costs. A 2009 study by the International Coach Federation found a median return on investment of seven times the initial investment, though the magnitude of returns varies considerably across contexts and depends heavily on the quality of coaching delivery and organizational implementation.
Academic Achievement Coaching
Educational institutions have increasingly adopted goal achievement coaching to support student success, particularly in higher education settings where students must demonstrate substantial self-direction and time management capabilities. Academic coaches help students set realistic semester goals, develop effective study strategies, manage competing demands, overcome procrastination, maintain motivation during challenging periods, and prepare for post-graduation transitions.
Research evaluating academic coaching programs has shown positive effects on student retention, grade point averages, graduation rates, and students’ sense of belonging and self-efficacy (Robinson & Gahagan, 2010). These outcomes prove particularly pronounced for first-generation college students, students from disadvantaged backgrounds, and those experiencing academic difficulties, suggesting that coaching can help level playing fields and support equitable educational outcomes.
Health and Wellness Coaching
The application of goal achievement coaching principles to health behavior change has generated an extensive research literature demonstrating effectiveness for diverse health-related goals including weight management, physical activity adoption, chronic disease management, stress reduction, and health risk modification. Health and wellness coaches help clients set sustainable health goals, identify barriers to healthy behaviors, develop realistic action plans, maintain motivation over extended periods, and navigate the psychological challenges inherent in lifestyle change (Wolever et al., 2013).
The chronic disease management context provides particularly compelling evidence for coaching effectiveness, as successful outcomes require sustained behavioral change over months or years rather than short-term interventions. Studies examining coaching for diabetes management, cardiovascular disease prevention, and obesity treatment have documented improvements in both health behaviors and clinical outcomes including blood glucose control, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and weight (Kivela et al., 2014).
Assessment and Measurement in Goal Achievement Coaching
Rigorous assessment practices distinguish professional goal achievement coaching from informal advice-giving or motivational speaking. Systematic evaluation serves multiple purposes: establishing baseline conditions, monitoring progress toward goals, evaluating coaching effectiveness, and contributing to the broader evidence base for coaching psychology.
Goal Attainment Scaling
Goal attainment scaling (GAS) represents one of the most widely employed assessment methodologies in goal achievement coaching research and practice. Originally developed in the 1960s for evaluating mental health programs, GAS has proven highly adaptable to coaching contexts because it allows individualized goal measurement while enabling aggregation across clients for research purposes (Grant, 2012).
The GAS process involves several steps. First, the client and coach collaboratively identify specific goals. Second, they define five levels of attainment for each goal, ranging from the most unfavorable outcome considered likely (-2) through the expected level of achievement (0) to the most favorable outcome considered likely (+2). Third, at designated time points, actual attainment levels are rated and compared to expected outcomes. This methodology accommodates the inherent diversity of coaching goals while providing quantitative data suitable for statistical analysis.
Research employing GAS has demonstrated that coached individuals typically exceed their expected levels of goal achievement, with meta-analytic findings showing mean effect sizes in the medium to large range (Theeboom et al., 2014). These findings provide compelling evidence for coaching effectiveness while acknowledging that outcomes vary considerably based on coach expertise, client characteristics, goal types, and coaching duration.
Psychological Well-being Measures
While goal achievement coaching focuses primarily on accomplishing specific objectives, researchers increasingly recognize the importance of assessing broader psychological outcomes including well-being, life satisfaction, and psychological distress. Studies examining these dimensions have generally documented positive effects extending beyond specific goal attainment to include enhanced overall well-being, reduced stress and anxiety, improved self-efficacy, and increased positive affect (Green et al., 2007).
| Assessment Domain | Common Measures | Typical Findings in Coaching Research |
|---|---|---|
| Goal Attainment | Goal Attainment Scaling, Self-report goal achievement ratings | Medium to large effect sizes; coaches clients typically exceed expected goal attainment levels |
| Self-efficacy | General Self-Efficacy Scale, Domain-specific efficacy measures | Small to medium increases in general and domain-specific self-efficacy |
| Well-being | Satisfaction with Life Scale, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Psychological Well-being Scales | Small to medium improvements in life satisfaction, positive affect, and psychological well-being |
| Mental Health | Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, General Health Questionnaire | Small reductions in stress and anxiety; minimal effects on depression (ceiling effects common) |
| Work-Related Outcomes | Job satisfaction measures, Work engagement scales, Organizational commitment assessments | Small to medium improvements in job satisfaction, engagement, and organizational commitment |
Challenges and Limitations
Despite substantial evidence supporting goal achievement coaching effectiveness, the field faces several challenges that warrant acknowledgment and ongoing attention from researchers and practitioners.
Variability in Coach Training and Competence
The coaching industry remains relatively unregulated, with multiple competing credentialing organizations, widely varying training requirements, and no universal standards for coach preparation. This situation creates considerable variability in coach competence and makes it difficult for potential clients to identify qualified practitioners. While organizations such as the International Coach Federation and the British Psychological Society have established credentialing criteria and ethical guidelines, many individuals practice coaching without formal training or adherence to professional standards.
Research examining the relationship between coach characteristics and coaching outcomes has produced mixed findings, with some studies documenting superior outcomes for coaches with psychology backgrounds or extensive training while others find minimal differences. This inconsistency may reflect the reality that effective coaching requires a combination of theoretical knowledge, practical skills, interpersonal capabilities, and contextual expertise that are not fully captured by credentials alone (Blackman et al., 2016).
Client Engagement and Dropout
While goal achievement coaching proves highly effective for motivated, engaged clients, maintaining consistent participation represents a significant challenge. Dropout rates in coaching relationships vary considerably across contexts but can reach 30-50% in some settings, particularly when coaching is organizationally mandated rather than voluntarily sought. Understanding factors that predict engagement and retention, and developing strategies to enhance sustained participation, remains an important research and practice priority.
Goal Conflict and Unintended Consequences
Not all goals prove equally beneficial to pursue, and focused achievement of certain objectives may create deficits in other life domains. Coaches must help clients consider potential unintended consequences of single-minded goal pursuit and maintain balance across multiple life roles and responsibilities. Additionally, goals that primarily serve extrinsic motivations or reflect internalized external pressures rather than authentic personal values may be achieved without producing corresponding increases in well-being or life satisfaction (Sheldon & Kasser, 1998).
Future Directions and Emerging Trends
The field of goal achievement coaching continues to evolve, with several promising directions for future development.
Technology-Enhanced Coaching
Digital platforms, artificial intelligence, and mobile applications are creating new possibilities for delivering coaching services and enhancing traditional coaching relationships. Smartphone-based coaching apps provide prompts, tracking capabilities, and between-session support that extend coaching influence beyond face-to-face meetings. Preliminary research suggests that technology-augmented coaching may produce outcomes comparable to or exceeding traditional approaches for certain goal types, though questions about the optimal balance between human interaction and technological support remain under investigation (Stein & Brooks, 2016).
Integration with Positive Psychology
The positive psychology movement, which emphasizes scientific study of human flourishing and optimal functioning, shares considerable conceptual overlap with goal achievement coaching. Increasingly, coaches are incorporating positive psychology interventions—including gratitude practices, strength identification and deployment, savoring exercises, and meaning-making activities—into their work with clients. These practices complement traditional goal achievement strategies while addressing broader dimensions of psychological well-being and life satisfaction (Biswas-Diener & Dean, 2007).
Neuroscience Contributions
Advances in neuroscience are providing increasingly sophisticated understanding of the brain processes underlying goal pursuit, motivation, habit formation, and self-regulation. While practical applications of neuroscience findings to coaching practice remain in early stages, this research promises to refine coaching methodologies by grounding them in neurobiological mechanisms. For example, understanding the role of dopamine in reward anticipation and motivation, or the prefrontal cortex in goal-directed behavior and impulse control, can inform coaching strategies and help coaches explain to clients why certain techniques prove effective.
Conclusion
Goal achievement coaching represents a mature, evidence-based approach to helping individuals identify, pursue, and accomplish meaningful objectives across diverse life domains. Grounded in decades of psychological research on motivation, goal-setting, and self-regulation, coaching provides structured methodologies that significantly enhance the probability of successful goal attainment while simultaneously promoting psychological well-being, self-efficacy, and personal development.
The growing research base demonstrates that goal achievement coaching produces measurable benefits for individuals and organizations, with effect sizes generally in the medium range and return-on-investment calculations showing positive financial returns. As the field continues to mature, increased standardization of training, integration with emerging technologies, and refinement of evidence-based practices promise to further enhance coaching effectiveness and expand its applications to new populations and contexts.
For individuals seeking to accomplish important goals, goal achievement coaching offers a powerful partnership that provides clarity, accountability, strategic guidance, and sustained support throughout the often-challenging journey from aspiration to achievement. As our understanding of human motivation and behavioral change continues to deepen, goal achievement coaching will undoubtedly evolve, but its core commitment to helping people bridge the gap between current reality and desired future will remain central to its identity and value.
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
Biswas-Diener, R., & Dean, B. (2007). Positive psychology coaching: Putting the science of happiness to work for your clients. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Positive+Psychology+Coaching%3A+Putting+the+Science+of+Happiness+to+Work+for+Your+Clients-p-9780470043851
Blackman, A., Moscardo, G., & Gray, D. E. (2016). Challenges for the theory and practice of business coaching: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 459-486. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1534484316673177
Boyce, L. A., Jackson, R. J., & Neal, L. J. (2010). Building successful leadership coaching relationships: Examining impact of matching criteria in a leadership coaching program. Journal of Management Development, 29(10), 914-931. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02621711011084231/full/html
Clear, J. (2018). Atomic habits: An easy and proven way to build good habits and break bad ones. Avery. https://jamesclear.com/atomic-habits
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/44330/mindset-by-carol-s-dweck-phd/
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065260106380021
Grant, A. M. (2003). The impact of life coaching on goal attainment, metacognition and mental health. Social Behavior and Personality, 31(3), 253-264. https://www.sbp-journal.com/index.php/sbp/article/view/1120
Grant, A. M. (2012). An integrated model of goal-focused coaching: An evidence-based framework for teaching and practice. International Coaching Psychology Review, 7(2), 146-165. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287348148_An_integrated_model_of_goal-focused_coaching_An_evidence-based_framework_for_teaching_and_practice
Grant, A. M., & Cavanagh, M. J. (2007). Evidence-based coaching: Flourishing or languishing? Australian Psychologist, 42(4), 239-254. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00050060701648175
Green, L. S., Oades, L. G., & Grant, A. M. (2007). Cognitive-behavioral, solution-focused life coaching: Enhancing goal striving, well-being, and hope. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(3), 142-149. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17439760600619849
Harkin, B., Webb, T. L., Chang, B. P., Prestwich, A., Conner, M., Kellar, I., Benn, Y., & Sheeran, P. (2016). Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 142(2), 198-229. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-52609-001
Holmes, P. S., & Collins, D. J. (2001). The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13(1), 60-83. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10413200109339004
Jones, R. J., Woods, S. A., & Guillaume, Y. R. (2016). The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta-analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 249-277. https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/joop.12119
Kivela, K., Elo, S., Kyngas, H., & Kaariainen, M. (2014). The effects of health coaching on adult patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 97(2), 147-157. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399114003158
Lally, P., van Jaarsveld, C. H., Potts, H. W., & Wardle, J. (2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 998-1009. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ejsp.674
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-15044-007
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265-268. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x
Oettingen, G. (2012). Future thought and behaviour change. European Review of Social Psychology, 23(1), 1-63. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10463283.2011.643698
Robinson, C., & Gahagan, J. (2010). Coaching students to academic success and engagement on campus. About Campus, 15(4), 26-29. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/abc.20032
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-13324-007
Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1319-1331. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01461672982412006
Stein, D., & Brooks, S. (2016). Technology and coaching psychology. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/technology-and-coaching-psychology-9780190692902
Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & van Vianen, A. E. (2014). Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 1-18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2013.837499
Wolever, R. Q., Simmons, L. A., Sforzo, G. A., Dill, D., Kaye, M., Bechard, E. M., Southard, M. E., Kennedy, M., Vosloo, J., & Yang, N. (2013). A systematic review of the literature on health and wellness coaching: Defining a key behavioral intervention in healthcare. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 2(4), 38-57. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.7453/gahmj.2013.042