Youth homelessness represents a critical public health crisis that demands comprehensive understanding and trauma-informed counseling interventions. Between 2023 and 2024, homelessness among children under 18 increased by 33%, with approximately 148,238 children and 38,170 unaccompanied youth experiencing homelessness on a single night in January 2024. Young people experience homelessness through distinct pathways involving family conflict, abuse, neglect, poverty, and system involvement, with significant disparities affecting LGBTQ+ youth, youth of color, and those aging out of foster care. Counseling psychology must address the multifaceted trauma, mental health challenges, and developmental needs of homeless youth through evidence-based interventions including trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy, crisis stabilization, and integrated housing-support models that recognize housing as foundational to therapeutic progress. This article examines the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentations, and effective crisis counseling approaches for this vulnerable population.
Introduction
Homelessness among youth represents one of the most pressing challenges facing counseling psychology and social services today. The experiences of young people without stable housing extend far beyond the absence of a physical dwelling; homelessness encompasses profound trauma, developmental disruption, and exposure to circumstances that fundamentally alter the trajectory of adolescent and emerging adult development. Unlike the homelessness that often affects older adults, youth homelessness typically emerges from family instability, maltreatment, and systems failures rather than the chronic illness and disability that characterizes adult homelessness.
Understanding homeless youth requires recognition that this population experiences a fluid, dynamic process rather than a static condition. Young people may move between couch surfing, temporary shelter arrangements, motel stays, street sleeping, and various combinations of these situations. The complexity of youth homelessness demands that counseling professionals possess specialized knowledge about developmental considerations, trauma responses, and intervention strategies specifically adapted for this age group. This article provides counseling psychologists and mental health professionals with comprehensive, clinically grounded information about homeless youth and evidence-based crisis counseling approaches.
Scope and Definition of Youth Homelessness
Understanding the Population
Youth homelessness is typically defined as young people under 25 years of age who lack a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence. This definition includes both unaccompanied youth and youth in families, encompassing those sleeping in emergency shelters, transitional housing, unsheltered locations, motels, or doubled up with others due to economic hardship or lack of alternatives.
The actual prevalence of youth homelessness significantly exceeds official counts reported through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Point-in-Time (PIT) methodology. While the 2024 PIT Count documented 148,238 children under 18 and 38,170 unaccompanied youth experiencing homelessness on a single night in January, data from public schools paint a starkly different picture. During the 2022-2023 school year, public schools identified approximately 1.4 million children and youth experiencing homelessness according to the education definition—a figure that is dramatically higher than HUD counts. This discrepancy occurs because most homeless youth do not stay in shelters or on the streets; rather, approximately 84% stay in motels or temporarily with other people, situations not captured by street counts.
Recent Epidemiological Trends
The most recent data reveal alarming increases in youth homelessness. Between 2023 and 2024, homelessness among children under 18 increased by 33 percent, representing the largest single-year increase of any population group. Unaccompanied youth ages 18 to 24 experienced a 10 percent increase during the same period. These increases follow a broader upward trajectory; since the 2004-05 school year, public school data show a 110 percent increase in children and families meeting the federal education definition of homelessness.
Current statistics indicate that approximately one in ten youth ages 18 to 25 experience homelessness at some point during the year, and approximately one in 30 youth ages 13 to 17 endure homelessness annually. Among people experiencing homelessness overall, youth and children constitute a substantial portion: in 2024, more than one in four people experiencing homelessness was either a child under 18 (19%) or a young adult between 18 and 24 (8%).
Risk Factors and Vulnerable Subpopulations
Family-Based Risk Factors
Family conflict and maltreatment represent the primary drivers of youth homelessness. Research indicates that approximately 90 percent of youth accessing shelters report experiencing significant difficulties at home, including constant conflict, neglect, and abuse. Young people become homeless following escalating patterns of family dysfunction that create intolerable living situations.
Child abuse and neglect emerge as central risk factors. Physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect destabilize the family system and make home environments unsafe. Parental substance use disorders frequently correlate with family instability and youth homelessness, as parental addiction diverts resources, creates chaotic home environments, and sometimes results in child welfare involvement.
Domestic violence represents another critical risk factor. Youth exposed to domestic violence in the home face elevated risk of homelessness, and the violence can directly precipitate leaving home for safety. Some youth leave home to reduce family strain during economic hardship, representing a misguided but rational attempt to diminish family burden.
Systemic Risk Factors
Youth involvement with child welfare and juvenile justice systems substantially increases homelessness risk. Approximately 12 to 36 percent of youth aging out of the foster care system experience homelessness. Within foster care, LGBTQ+ youth are dramatically overrepresented; while approximately 11 percent of youth identify as LGBTQ+, studies show that 30 percent of youth in foster care identify as LGBTQ+ and 5 percent identify as transgender. Despite being in substitute care designed to protect them, LGBTQ+ youth frequently experience mistreatment, discrimination, and violence within foster homes, leading many to flee to the streets where they perceive greater safety.
Educational disconnection creates vulnerability to homelessness. Youth who do not complete high school demonstrate 3.5 times greater likelihood of experiencing homelessness than peers who achieve a high school diploma. Educational gaps often precede or accompany early homelessness and reflect broader patterns of system disconnection.
Disparities in Vulnerable Populations
Racial and Ethnic Disparities. Black youth experience an 83 percent increased risk of homelessness compared to white peers, and Hispanic youth face a 33 percent increased risk. These disparities reflect long-standing structural racism, housing discrimination, and inequitable access to educational and economic opportunities. The intersection of racism with other marginalization creates compounded vulnerability for youth of color.
LGBTQ+ Youth. Among the most striking disparities, LGBTQ+ youth demonstrate a 120 percent higher risk of experiencing homelessness. Up to 40 percent of homeless youth identify as LGBTQ+, compared to approximately 9.5 percent of the general U.S. population. The primary pathway to homelessness for LGBTQ+ youth involves family rejection based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Youth are kicked out of their homes or leave because the environment becomes too dangerous following disclosure of their identity. LGBTQ+ youth report family rejection—both verbal and physical harassment—at rates substantially exceeding heterosexual youth.
Within homeless populations, LGBTQ+ youth face disproportionate victimization. LGBTQ+ homeless youth experience sexual assault at three times the rate of non-LGBTQ+ homeless youth. When homeless LGBTQ+ youth seek shelter, they frequently encounter further discrimination and abuse from staff and other residents, creating an environment that replicates the rejection they experienced from family.
Young Parents. Young parents, particularly unmarried youth, demonstrate three times higher risk of homelessness compared to non-parenting peers. Parenting youth face compounded challenges in accessing housing, employment, and services while managing the demands of childrearing.
Youth with Foster Care Involvement. Among homeless youth, overrepresentation of foster care alumni is substantial. One study found that 65 percent of LGBTQ+ homeless youth had lived in foster or group homes. Further research indicates that 56 percent of LGBTQ+ foster youth experienced homelessness at some point, with many reporting they felt safer on the streets than in their foster placements.
Trauma Exposure and Mental Health Presentations
Trauma Patterns in Homeless Youth
Homeless youth represent a population with extraordinarily high trauma exposure. Research documents that approximately 18 percent of homeless youth living in shelters and on the streets experience symptoms meeting diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), substantially exceeding rates in the general adolescent population.
Trauma exposure in this population follows multiple temporal patterns. Pre-homelessness trauma stems from maltreatment in the home environment and includes child abuse, domestic violence exposure, and neglect. Youth then experience trauma during the transition to homelessness—the actual separation from family and confrontation with survival needs. Finally, ongoing trauma occurs while experiencing homelessness, including street victimization, sexual exploitation, violence, and the daily stressors of housing instability.
Research on sheltered youth demonstrates clinically elevated pre-intervention PTSD symptoms well above general population rates. Youth show high exposure to potentially traumatic events; many have experienced four or more types of potentially traumatic event exposures. Common traumatic experiences include witnessing violence, experiencing physical assault, sexual victimization, witnessing death, and life-threatening situations.
Mental Health Challenges
Depression and anxiety predominate among homeless youth presenting for mental health services. Research from shelter-based clinics indicates that depression, anger, and adjustment disorders emerge as the most common presenting mental health concerns at initial assessment, with trauma identified as a significant complaint among youth returning for follow-up sessions. The delayed identification of trauma reflects youth’s reluctance to disclose traumatic experiences to new providers and the time required to build therapeutic safety.
More than half of homeless youth report experiencing mental health challenges at intake into services. Young people experiencing homelessness express symptoms of anxiety and depression at rates substantially exceeding housed adolescents. The developmental period of adolescence itself involves significant neurobiological change in emotional regulation and stress response systems; homelessness during this critical period compounds developmental vulnerability.
Substance use disorders represent another significant mental health concern. Substance use among homeless youth occurs at rates two to three times higher than among non-homeless young adults. Approximately 29 percent of homeless youth report substance use problems, compared to approximately 10 percent of youth in the general population who will be diagnosed with a substance use disorder in their lifetime. For many homeless youth, substance use serves as a coping mechanism—an escape from physical and emotional trauma and the daily hardships of street life.
Comorbidity and Complexity. Trauma symptoms in homeless youth often co-occur with other mental health disorders. Depression, anxiety, conduct problems, and substance use frequently present together, creating complex clinical presentations. The individual’s experience and interpretation of trauma are shaped by their cultural context, community, and the circumstances surrounding the traumatic events.
Crisis Counseling Approaches for Homeless Youth
Trauma-Informed Principles
Effective crisis counseling with homeless youth begins with trauma-informed principles that recognize the pervasive impact of trauma and guide all aspects of service delivery. Trauma-informed approaches emphasize the recognition of trauma’s effects, understanding pathways to homelessness that typically involve significant adversity, and applying evidence-based practices within the context of the young person’s lived experience.
The framework of the Four E’s of trauma (Events, Experienced, Effects, and Equitable response) guides trauma-informed counseling. Counselors recognize traumatic events, understand how youth experienced these events, assess the effects on current functioning, and ensure equitable, culturally appropriate responses. The Four R’s of a trauma-informed approach—Realization, Recognition, Response, and Resistance to retraumatization—inform clinical practice.
Critical to trauma-informed counseling with homeless youth is avoiding replication of the powerlessness and lack of control that characterizes both trauma exposure and homelessness itself. Young people who have experienced profound losses of control require counseling approaches that restore agency, respect autonomy, and center the youth’s voice in treatment planning.
Crisis Intervention and Stabilization
In moments of acute crisis, homeless youth require immediate stabilization and safety planning. Crisis intervention focuses on de-escalation, ensuring safety, and connecting youth to basic needs and shelter. Professional counselors maintain calm, non-judgmental demeanor while assessing imminent danger and responding with protective interventions proportionate to the risk level.
Safety planning involves identifying warning signs of crisis, internal and external coping strategies, people and social settings that provide distraction, trusted people to turn to for help, and professional resources available during crisis. For homeless youth, safety planning must account for their unique circumstances; accessible resources may differ substantially from those available to housed youth, and plans must be practical within the constraints of street life.
Immediate crisis response emphasizes meeting basic survival needs before addressing mental health concerns. A youth experiencing homelessness in acute crisis requires immediate connection to shelter, food, and safety before engaging in therapeutic conversation about trauma or feelings. The hierarchy of needs applies practically in crisis work with this population.
Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
Among therapeutic approaches for treating trauma in youth, Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) has consistently emerged as a gold standard. Meta-analytic findings indicate that TF-CBT outperforms other commonly utilized forms of therapy, including EMDR, supportive counseling, family therapy, and parent training in treating post-traumatic responses in youth.
TF-CBT addresses trauma symptoms through a structured, evidence-based protocol. The approach integrates cognitive-behavioral principles with trauma-specific interventions. Components typically include psychoeducation about trauma and normal trauma responses, parental involvement when appropriate, relaxation and coping skills training, affective regulation skills, cognitive processing of the traumatic experience, trauma narrative development, in vivo exposure when indicated, and relapse prevention.
Research implementing TF-CBT in shelter settings demonstrates substantial reductions in both self-reported and maternal-reported PTSD symptomology. Changes are particularly notable in re-experiencing symptoms and arousal, core PTSD dimensions. Effectiveness varies by age and number of traumatic event exposures; youth experiencing multiple types of potentially traumatic events benefit substantially from TF-CBT, with post-intervention trauma severity equivalent across exposure groups.
Adaptations for the Homeless Context
Mental health counseling for homeless youth must adapt conventional approaches to account for the unique circumstances of this population. The competing demands of securing housing and managing day-to-day survival often create barriers to traditional outpatient mental health engagement. Youth may miss appointments due to lack of transportation, communication disruption from changing shelter locations, need to prioritize immediate survival concerns, or transportation barriers.
Counselors working with homeless youth typically employ brief, supportive interventions rather than extended treatment protocols. While specific evidence-based interventions like TF-CBT may be indicated, the reality of homeless youth’s engagement patterns often requires flexibility. The Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) offers clinical guidance in these situations, teaching youth key cognitive-behavioral tools that demonstrate positive clinical outcomes even with limited treatment exposure.
Shelter-based mental health clinics represent an adaptation bringing counseling services to youth where they access other services. These clinics reduce barriers to engagement by eliminating transportation needs and integrating mental health care within existing shelter services. However, research indicates substantial dropout after the initial intake session, suggesting that first appointments represent critical intervention points requiring concentrated clinical attention.
Crisis Counseling in Outreach and Drop-In Settings
Many homeless youth never access shelter systems and instead remain outside or in hidden situations like motels or doubled-up arrangements. Reaching this population requires outreach-based crisis counseling delivered in community settings rather than traditional clinical offices.
Outreach counseling emphasizes meeting young people where they are, literally and figuratively. Mobile mental health services, drop-in centers, and street outreach programs bring counselors to locations frequented by homeless youth. These approaches utilize principles of street culture competency, recognizing the unique social, environmental, economic, and trauma-related cultural dimensions of youth homelessness.
Counselors engaged in outreach-based crisis work must understand how trauma symptoms manifest behaviorally within street culture. High-risk behaviors, emotional dysregulation, and substance use that might appear as primary problems may actually represent trauma responses requiring trauma-informed interpretation and response.
Connection and relationship building form the foundation of outreach-based crisis counseling. Trust develops slowly when young people have experienced repeated betrayal and rejection. Crisis counselors in these settings invest time in genuine relationship development, demonstrating consistent availability, respect, and unconditional acceptance.
Housing-Supported Crisis Intervention
Housing as Foundation
Contemporary research and practice increasingly recognize housing as foundational to mental health intervention with homeless youth. Housing alone proves insufficient for most youth to sustain stability and thrive; however, housing combined with integrated supportive services creates conditions within which healing becomes possible.
The Housing First model, originating in New York City, has become an evidence-based standard. This approach prioritizes providing permanent housing without first requiring individuals to complete treatment, achieve sobriety, or participate in programs. Research demonstrates that Housing First programs maintain residents in permanent housing at rates up to 98 percent, substantially exceeding treatment-first models.
For youth specifically, the evidence suggests that rapid rehousing—providing time-limited housing assistance combined with intensive case management and services—represents an effective pathway to stability. Research indicates that between 75 and 91 percent of households remain housed one year after participating in rapid rehousing programs. Rapid rehousing typically provides temporary housing support for 12 to 24 months while youth develop independent living skills and increase employment or educational engagement.
Integrated Services Model
Effective crisis counseling with homeless youth integrates mental health services with housing support, case management, and practical life skills development. Young people transitioning from homelessness into housing face challenges in multiple life domains simultaneously: establishing regular routines, managing household responsibilities, seeking employment, reconnecting with education, healing trauma, and developing healthy relationships.
Multidisciplinary interventions incorporating outreach, case management, mental health support, and housing support produce superior outcomes compared to single-modality interventions. Counselors working within housing programs provide ongoing mental health support while case managers coordinate connection to employment services, educational programs, healthcare, and community resources.
Crisis counseling within housing programs addresses both immediate mental health crises and the ongoing therapeutic needs emerging as youth experience housing stability for possibly the first time. Young people may experience emotional dysregulation, difficulty adjusting to routine and structure, relationship challenges with roommates or program staff, or crises triggered by housing instability or community stressors. Counselors must be available to respond to these crises while simultaneously working on longer-term trauma processing and skill development.
Specialized Crisis Counseling Considerations
Working with LGBTQ+ Youth
LGBTQ+ homeless youth require affirming, identity-conscious crisis counseling that validates their sexual orientation and gender identity while acknowledging the discrimination and rejection they have experienced. Crisis counselors must examine their own biases and ensure that counseling responses neither replicate nor intensify the rejection youth have experienced from family and systems.
Affirmative crisis response to LGBTQ+ youth includes using correct names and pronouns, validating identity as healthy and non-pathological, and explicitly rejecting conversion therapy or attempts to change sexual orientation or gender identity. Counselors recognize that family rejection based on identity often represents the primary trauma and pathway to homelessness for LGBTQ+ youth.
Safety planning for LGBTQ+ homeless youth must address discrimination in shelter settings and street environments. Many youth report harassment and abuse from shelter staff and other residents based on sexual orientation or gender expression. Some LGBTQ+ youth prefer street homelessness over shelter systems they perceive as unsafe. Crisis counseling includes problem-solving about accessing affirming shelter options, safety strategies within non-affirming environments, and connection to LGBTQ+-specific services when available.
Cultural Competency and Racial Justice
Counseling homeless youth of color requires competent engagement with how racism, systemic discrimination, and historical injustices contribute to homelessness and shape youth’s presentation and needs. Black youth, Native American youth, and other youth of color experience homelessness at significantly higher rates, driven by housing discrimination, educational inequities, and poverty generated through structural racism.
Crisis counseling with youth of color must avoid perpetuating harm through racial microaggressions, stereotyping, or misinterpretation of culturally adaptive responses as pathology. Counselors examine their own racial biases and work actively to provide culturally congruent care. Recruiting and retaining counselors and case managers of color with shared cultural background to youth creates opportunities for students to experience affirming care from people who understand their lived experience of racial discrimination.
Challenges in Crisis Counseling Service Delivery
Engagement and Retention
One of the most significant challenges in crisis counseling with homeless youth involves engagement and retention. Research from shelter-based clinics documents that youth attend an average of only three sessions, with substantial dropout after the initial intake appointment. This limited engagement reflects multiple barriers: competing survival needs, lack of transportation to appointments, frequent changes in shelter location or living situation, employment demands, and past negative experiences with service systems.
The limited time youth engage in mental health care necessitates different clinical strategies than traditional outpatient counseling. Counselors cannot assume the longitudinal relationships characteristic of ongoing mental health treatment. Instead, crisis counseling must maximize impact within minimal contact.
System Navigation and Coordination
Homeless youth often interface with multiple systems simultaneously: child welfare, juvenile justice, education, healthcare, and homeless services. These systems sometimes operate with conflicting philosophies, assessment procedures, and service models. Crisis counselors must navigate these complex systems on behalf of youth while advocating for coordinated, youth-centered responses.
System fragmentation creates particular challenges for unaccompanied youth under 18, who may not qualify for adult services but face aged-out services from child welfare. Counselors often fill gaps by coordinating between systems and ensuring youth receive appropriate developmental services.
Resource Limitations
Many communities lack adequate mental health services specifically designed for homeless youth. Shelter-based clinics, mobile mental health units, and outreach-based counseling services require dedicated funding often unavailable through traditional healthcare financing mechanisms. Crisis counselors working with this population frequently do so with limited resources, inadequate staffing ratios, and insufficient training in youth homelessness and trauma.
Evidence-Based Interventions: Summary and Effectiveness
| Intervention | Core Components | Evidence Base | Appropriateness for Homeless Youth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) | Psychoeducation, coping skills, trauma narrative, cognitive processing, gradual exposure | Strong; meta-analytic evidence supporting superiority over alternative approaches | High; demonstrated effectiveness in shelter settings with significant PTSD symptom reduction |
| Housing First/Rapid Rehousing | Immediate permanent housing provision followed by case management and services | Strong; 75-98% housing retention rates; cost-effective | High; foundational to youth stability and prerequisite for mental health engagement |
| Crisis Intervention with Safety Planning | Immediate de-escalation, risk assessment, safety planning, resource connection | Established; standard emergency mental health practice | High; essential for acute crisis response and connection to services |
| Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) | Eight cognitive-behavioral tools adaptable to brief interventions | Emerging; demonstrated effectiveness with trauma-related disorders in low-resource settings | High; clinically feasible given limited engagement typical for homeless youth |
| Mobile/Outreach-Based Counseling | Relationship-based crisis response delivered in community settings | Emerging; demonstrates superior engagement compared to office-based services | High; reaches youth who do not access shelter or traditional services |
Recommendations for Counseling Practice
Effective crisis counseling with homeless youth requires commitment to specific practice principles:
- Lead with housing and basic needs. Assess and address immediate safety, shelter, food, and medical needs before or concurrent with mental health interventions. Young people cannot engage effectively in trauma processing while experiencing acute survival threats.
- Build genuine therapeutic relationships. Consistency, reliability, respect, and unconditional positive regard form the foundation of crisis counseling with youth who have experienced rejection and betrayal. Invest time in relationship building before attempting deeper therapeutic work.
- Practice cultural humility. Continuously examine biases and power dynamics in the counseling relationship. Recognize the expertise of youth regarding their own experience and honor their self-determination.
- Integrate trauma-informed principles throughout service delivery. Recognize trauma’s effects across all aspects of the youth’s functioning and service experience. Avoid practices that replicate powerlessness or control loss characteristic of trauma.
- Maximize impact within limited contact. Structure first sessions and brief interventions to provide maximum clinical benefit. Teach concrete coping strategies and skills that youth can apply independently.
- Coordinate across systems. Actively collaborate with schools, child welfare, juvenile justice, and housing systems to ensure coordinated, coherent support for youth navigating multiple service systems.
- Address identity affirmatively. Particularly with LGBTQ+ youth and youth of color, provide explicitly affirming responses that validate identity and address discrimination and structural oppression.
- Regularly assess safety. Maintain vigilance regarding suicidality, violence risk, substance use escalation, and victimization risk. Develop crisis safety plans collaboratively with youth.
Conclusion
Homeless youth represent one of the most vulnerable populations encountered by counseling psychologists, presenting with complex trauma histories, significant mental health challenges, and urgent practical needs. The epidemic growth in youth homelessness—with 33 percent increases in a single year and unprecedented numbers of children experiencing housing instability—demands that mental health professionals develop specialized competence in this area.
Effective crisis counseling with homeless youth integrates recognition of the multilayered trauma these young people experience, evidence-based mental health interventions adapted to their unique circumstances and limited treatment engagement, and fundamental commitment to housing and meeting basic needs as prerequisites for mental health recovery. The Housing First model and rapid rehousing interventions represent transformative shifts in approach, recognizing that stable housing and crisis counseling must proceed in parallel rather than sequentially.
Young people experiencing homelessness are not a homogeneous group; they bring diverse identities, trauma histories, and needs. LGBTQ+ youth, youth of color, those aging out of foster care, and other particularly vulnerable subgroups require specialized, affirming, culturally competent crisis responses. The counseling profession must expand its capacity to reach and serve homeless youth through innovative service delivery models including outreach-based and shelter-embedded crisis counseling.
The trajectory of youth experiencing homelessness need not be predetermined by their current circumstances. With specialized crisis counseling, trauma-informed housing support, and integrated services, young people can stabilize, heal, and develop toward healthy adulthood. The challenge for counseling psychology lies in mobilizing sufficient resources, developing adequate service capacity, and ensuring that professionals possess the knowledge and skills necessary to serve this population effectively.
References
- American Rescue Plan. (2021). Homeless Children and Youth Emergency Relief Grant Program. https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/education-department-awards-800-million-homeless-children-and-youth-emergency-relief-grant
- Bridgman, R. (2001). Housing First: Chronically homeless individuals and innovation. Canadian Housing and Renewal Association, 3-19.
- Campaign for Children. (2025). Child homelessness up 33%, new figures show. Retrieved from https://campaignforchildren.org/news/child-homelessness-up-33-new-figures-show/
- Covenant House. (2025). Mental health challenges of homeless youth. Retrieved from https://www.covenanthouse.org/homeless-issues/mental-health
- End Homelessness. (2024). State of homelessness: 2024 edition. Retrieved from https://endhomelessness.org/homelessness-in-america/homelessness-statistics/state-of-homelessness/
- Feinstein, R., Barkeley, P., & Perez, A. (2001). Justice for all? A report on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered youth in the New York juvenile justice system. Urban Justice Center.
- First Focus on Children. (2024). Child and youth homelessness continues to increase — We know what works, will Congress act? Retrieved from https://firstfocus.org/update/child-and-youth-homelessness-continues-to-increase-we-know-what-works-will-congress-act/
- Fraser, B., Pierse, N., Chisholm, E., & Cook, H. (2019). LGBTIQ+ homelessness: A review of the literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2677. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6695950/
- Gaetz, S., Ward, A., & Kimura, L. (2019). Youth homelessness and housing stability: What outcomes should we be looking for? Retrieved from https://housingmatters.urban.org
- Gurdak, K., Fitzpatrick, M., Henwood, B. F., & Redline, B. (2022). Transitioning to independent living: Experiences of homeless young adults in rapid rehousing. Children and Youth Services Review, 135, 106357. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0190740922000301
- Henwood, B. F., Redline, B., & Rice, E. (2019). What do homeless transition-age youth want from housing interventions? Children and Youth Services Review, 89, 1-5. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-019-7856-0
- Human Rights Campaign. (2023). LGBTQ+ youth in foster care 2023 fact sheet. Retrieved from https://www.childrensrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/CR-LGBTQ-Youth-in-Foster-Care-2023-Fact-Sheet.pdf
- National Alliance to End Homelessness. (2025). Youth and young adults. Retrieved from https://endhomelessness.org/homelessness-in-america/who-experiences-homelessness/youth/
- National Network for Youth. (2025). LGBTQ+ youth homelessness. Retrieved from https://nn4youth.org/learn/lgbtq-homeless-youth/
- National Network for Youth. (2021). Youth homelessness. Retrieved from https://nn4youth.org/learn/youth-homelessness/
- National Institutes of Health. (2017). Trauma among unaccompanied homeless youth: The integration of street culture into a model of intervention. PMC, 2860307. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2860307/
- Paxson, C., Doroudi, F., & Yang, C. S. (2021). Addressing mental health and trauma-related needs of sheltered children and families with Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy. PMC, 9393136. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393136/
- SchoolHouse Connection. (2025). Critical connections: Ensuring mental health services for children and youth experiencing homelessness. Retrieved from https://schoolhouseconnection.org/article/critical-connections-ensuring-mental-health-services-for-children-and-youth-experiencing-homelessness
- SchoolHouse Connection. (2025). New data show dramatic increases in family and youth homelessness for the second consecutive year. Retrieved from https://schoolhouseconnection.org/article/new-data-show-dramatic-increases-in-family-and-youth-homelessness-for-the-second-consecutive-year
- SchoolHouse Connection. (2025). The pitfalls of HUD’s Point-in-Time Count for children, youth, and families. Retrieved from https://schoolhouseconnection.org/article/the-pitfalls-of-huds-point-in-time-count-for-children-youth-and-families
- Semborski, S., Redline, B., Madden, D., Granger, T., & Henwood, B. F. (2020). Housing interventions for emerging adults experiencing homelessness: A scoping review. PMC, 8372952. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8372952/
- Slesnick, N., Brakenhoff, B., Bunger, A., Chavez, L., Cuthbertson, C., & others. (2023). Lessons learned from Housing First, rapid rehousing trials with youth experiencing homelessness. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 18(1), 58. https://ascpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13722-023-00413-x
- Tyler, K. A., Schmitz, R. M., & Simons, L. G. (2018). A comparison of risk factors for various forms of trauma in the lives of lesbian, gay, bisexual and heterosexual homeless youth. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 19(4), 431-443. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29601290/
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2024). 2024 Annual Homelessness Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress Part 1. Retrieved from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/2024-AHAR-Part-1.pdf
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2025). Homelessness resources and programs. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/programs/social-services/homelessness/resources/index.html
- U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness. (2019). The evidence behind approaches that drive an end to homelessness. Retrieved from https://www.usich.gov/sites/default/files/document/Evidence-Behind-Approaches-That-End-Homelessness-Brief-2019.pdf