Bullying prevention counseling represents a critical specialization within educational counseling that addresses one of the most pervasive threats to student well-being and academic success. This comprehensive approach integrates evidence-based interventions at universal, targeted, and individual levels to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization while promoting positive school climates. Bullying prevention counseling encompasses school-wide programs, individual therapeutic interventions, bystander training, restorative practices, and specialized approaches for cyberbullying. Research demonstrates that well-implemented bullying prevention programs can reduce bullying behaviors by approximately 18-19% and victimization by 15-16%. Counselors play an essential role in designing, implementing, and evaluating these interventions while providing direct support to students affected by bullying. This article examines the theoretical foundations, evidence-based programs, counseling approaches, and emerging trends in bullying prevention counseling, emphasizing the integration of prevention and intervention strategies within comprehensive school counseling programs.
Understanding Bullying: Definitions and Scope
Defining Bullying Behavior
Bullying is defined as aggressive behavior incorporating three key elements: an intention to harm, repetitive nature, and a clear power imbalance between perpetrator and victim. This definition, established by prominent researchers in the 1980s in Norway, distinguishes bullying from other forms of peer conflict and aggression. The power imbalance may be physical, social, or psychological, and the repetitive nature differentiates bullying from isolated aggressive incidents.
Bullying manifests in multiple forms, including physical bullying (hitting, pushing, or damaging property), verbal bullying (name-calling, threats, or insults), relational or social bullying (exclusion, rumor-spreading, or reputation damage), and cyberbullying (harassment through digital platforms). Each form can cause significant psychological harm, and many students experience multiple types simultaneously. Understanding these distinctions is essential for counselors developing targeted intervention strategies.
Prevalence and Impact
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, 19% of middle and high school students reported being victims of bullying during the 2021-2022 school year, with 22% stating the bullying was cyber-related. These statistics represent only reported incidents; actual prevalence rates may be considerably higher due to underreporting. Among students ages 12-18 who reported being bullied during school, 21.6% were bullied online or by text.
The consequences of bullying extend far beyond immediate distress. Bullying perpetration is associated with suicidal ideation, weapon carrying, drug use, and violence and offending in later life, while bullying victimization is linked to suicidal ideation, anxiety, low self-esteem, and loneliness. These negative outcomes underscore the critical importance of effective prevention and intervention strategies within educational settings.
Certain populations face disproportionate risk. During the past year among high school students, LGBTQ+ students were more likely than cisgender and heterosexual students to be bullied at school (29% vs 16%) and electronically bullied (25% vs 13%). Additionally, students with disabilities experience higher rates of both victimization and perpetration compared to their peers without disabilities. These disparities require culturally responsive and inclusive counseling approaches.
Cyberbullying: An Evolving Challenge
The digital age has introduced cyberbullying as a distinct and growing concern. The percentages of students ages 13-17 who have experienced cyberbullying at some point in their lifetimes more than doubled from 18.8% to 54.6% between 2007 and 2023, with 26.5% of students experiencing cyberbullying in the previous 30 days in 2023. This dramatic increase reflects the pervasive role of technology in adolescent social interactions.
When students were asked about specific types of cyberbullying, mean or hurtful comments posted online (30.4%), exclusion from group chats (28.9%), rumors spread online (28.4%), and someone embarrassing or humiliating them online (26.9%) were the most commonly reported. The public and permanent nature of digital harassment creates unique challenges, as victimization can continue beyond school hours and reach wider audiences than traditional bullying.
Gender differences emerge in cyberbullying patterns. Adolescent girls are more likely to have experienced cyberbullying in their lifetimes (59.2% female vs 49.5% male) and over the previous 30 days (28.6% female vs 24.2% male). These differences inform the development of gender-responsive prevention strategies.
Theoretical Frameworks for Bullying Prevention Counseling
Socio-Ecological Perspective
The socio-ecological model provides a comprehensive framework for understanding bullying as a phenomenon influenced by individual, relationship, community, and societal factors. This perspective recognizes that bullying behavior emerges from complex interactions between personal characteristics, peer dynamics, school climate, family environments, and broader cultural norms. Effective bullying prevention counseling addresses multiple levels of this ecological system simultaneously.
At the individual level, factors such as social skills deficits, emotional regulation difficulties, and attitudes toward aggression influence both perpetration and victimization. Relationship factors include peer group dynamics, social status hierarchies, and the quality of student-teacher relationships. Community factors encompass school policies, climate, and the physical environment. Societal influences include media portrayals of aggression and cultural norms regarding power and dominance.
Social Cognitive Theory
Social cognitive theory-based interventions aim to improve cognitive abilities in dealing with bullying-related trauma, focusing on bullying prevention, self-efficacy in controlling bullying, social support, standard norms, expectancies, and establishing positive attitudes. This theoretical foundation emphasizes the reciprocal interactions between personal factors, behavior, and environmental influences.
From this perspective, bullying prevention counseling targets cognitive processes including moral reasoning, empathy development, and outcome expectations. Interventions help students recognize the harmful consequences of bullying, develop empathy for victims, and understand alternatives to aggressive behavior. By modifying cognitive patterns and reinforcing prosocial behaviors, counselors can facilitate lasting behavioral change.
Cognitive-Behavioral Framework
The cognitive behavioral therapy model offers a well-established, theoretical, evidence-based framework for understanding and treating issues commonly experienced by bullying victims, including cognitive flexibility, emotional regulation, behavioral issues, and fear responses, within a developmental perspective. This approach is particularly relevant for individual counseling with students affected by bullying.
The CBT framework addresses maladaptive thought patterns, emotional responses, and behavioral reactions associated with bullying experiences. For victims, interventions focus on restructuring negative self-perceptions, developing coping strategies, and building resilience. For perpetrators, CBT addresses distorted thinking patterns that justify aggressive behavior and develops alternative social problem-solving skills. Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy has strong conceptual rationale to be considered as a viable treatment for bullying, as the nature of bullying (that it occurs as events, leaves children feeling unsafe, and engenders emotional distress) and its association with posttraumatic stress symptoms among youth suggests that trauma treatment for bullying is promising.
Bystander Intervention Model
The Bystander Intervention Model conceptualizes the process through which witnesses of bullying may choose to intervene, involving five steps: Notice the Event, Interpret the Event as an Emergency, Accept Responsibility, Know How to Act, and Decision to Intervene. This model provides a valuable framework for developing bystander-focused interventions that empower students to become active defenders of their peers.
Bullying prevention counseling based on this model educates students about bullying dynamics, emphasizes the importance of intervention, and provides specific strategies for safe and effective action. By addressing each step of the intervention process, counselors can increase the likelihood that students will act as defenders when they witness bullying situations.
Evidence-Based Bullying Prevention Programs
The Olweus Bullying Prevention Program
The Olweus Bullying Prevention Program is backed by over 40 years of research and has been recognized as the most extensively studied bullying prevention program of its kind. Developed by Dan Olweus in Norway, the OBPP represents a comprehensive, whole-school approach to bullying prevention.
The program operates at multiple levels, including school-wide components (establishing and enforcing clear rules against bullying, improving supervision, and creating a school-wide coordinating committee), classroom-level activities (regular class meetings to discuss bullying, enforcing classroom rules, and holding class meetings about bullying), and individual interventions (discussions with students involved in bullying situations and meetings with parents).
Research demonstrates that the OBPP effectively reduces bullying and victimization, with overall effects becoming stronger the longer the program has been in place. Longitudinal analyses documented increases in students’ expressions of empathy with bullied peers, marked decreases in their willingness to join in bullying, and perceptions that their primary teacher had increased efforts to address bullying.
Students in schools that continued to implement the OBPP experienced significantly less bullying two to eight years after launching the program, with the likelihood of being bullied in a non-Olweus school nearly 40% higher than for students in schools that continued implementation. This finding underscores the importance of sustained implementation and program fidelity.
Implementation in diverse settings has yielded varying results. In an eight-year study in urban middle schools serving primarily African American students from low-income areas, the OBPP resulted in significant decreases in teacher-reported relational, physical, and verbal aggression and victimization, as well as student-reported reductions in relational aggression and cyber aggression. However, in Germany, the effectiveness of the program statistically depended on its complete implementation, with schools that did not complete the 18-month implementation period showing no change in victimization prevalence.
The KiVa Antibullying Program
Developed in Finland, the KiVa program represents another highly researched comprehensive approach to bullying prevention. The program is predicated on the idea that a positive change in the behaviors of classmates can reduce the rewards gained by the perpetrators of bullying and consequently their motivation to bully in the first place.
Research demonstrates that the KiVa program is effective in reducing school bullying and victimization, with results suggesting that well-conceived school-based programs can reduce victimization despite some evidence against school-based interventions. The odds of being a victim or bully were about 1.3 times and 1.5 times higher, respectively, for control school students than for KiVa school students.
The program includes universal actions (student lessons focusing on group dynamics and empathy, particularly emphasizing how bystanders can reduce bullying) and indicated actions (tackling acute cases through school KiVa teams consisting of three adults). During the first 9 months of implementation in a nationwide trial involving approximately 150,000 students in 888 schools, the KiVa program reduced both victimization and bullying.
The program has demonstrated effectiveness across multiple countries and contexts. KiVa significantly reduced the frequency of cybervictimization among students, with results revealing a significant intervention effect on this increasingly important form of bullying. The positive effects of KiVa on defending behavior could partly be explained by the positive effects of the program on feelings of responsibility to intervene and expectations that defending would make the bullying decrease or stop.
STAC Bystander Intervention Program
STAC is a brief bullying intervention program for schools that teaches students to act as “defenders” on behalf of targets of bullying, consisting of a 90-minute training conducted by the school counselor followed by two bi-weekly 15-minute booster sessions. The acronym STAC represents four intervention strategies students can use when witnessing bullying.
“Stealing the show” involves using humor or distraction to interrupt the bullying situation, removing attention from the target. “Turning it over” means informing an adult about the bullying and asking for help. “Accompanying others” involves befriending or providing support to the targeted student. “Coaching compassion” involves gently confronting the perpetrator to increase empathy for the target.
Students trained in the STAC program report increased perceived knowledge and confidence to act as defenders, with research showing effectiveness in reducing bullying victimization and perpetration among middle school students. Additionally, students trained in STAC reported decreases in depressive symptoms, social anxiety, and passive suicidal ideation while experiencing a more positive sense of self.
Research examining the STAC intervention within the context of the Bystander Intervention Model found significant increases in the “Know How to Act” step for both bystanders and non-bystanders, demonstrating that the program successfully equips students with specific skills for intervention. The brief nature of the program makes it particularly attractive for schools with limited resources, and its focus on empowering bystanders addresses the reality that peers are most often present during bullying incidents.
Additional Evidence-Based Programs
Systematic review evidence shows that when school-based anti-bullying interventions are implemented in schools, students report fewer episodes of bullying perpetration, fewer episodes of bullying victimization, and fewer mental health symptoms like anxiety and depression. Multiple programs have demonstrated effectiveness across various settings and populations.
Second Step is a social-emotional learning program that includes bullying prevention components. Results demonstrated significant intervention effects for the prevention of school bullying on 50% of all outcomes examined, with effects found for both proximal and distal outcomes. The program integrates skills for empathy, emotion management, and problem-solving into regular classroom instruction.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) provides a whole-school three-tier framework. Available research suggests that PBIS is a promising approach for addressing issues related to student discipline, school climate, and bullying. By establishing clear behavioral expectations, teaching appropriate behaviors, and consistently acknowledging positive behavior, PBIS creates an environment that reduces opportunities for bullying.
Individual Counseling Approaches
Assessment and Identification
Effective individual counseling begins with comprehensive assessment of students’ experiences with bullying. Counselors must carefully evaluate the nature, frequency, and impact of bullying involvement, whether as victim, perpetrator, or both. Assessment tools may include structured interviews, self-report questionnaires, behavioral observations, and consultation with teachers and parents.
School counseling was an effective intervention for middle school students who had been bullied when the counseling focused on improving peer relationships, with students who had been bullied experiencing significantly more rapid rates of decrease in peer problems with each successive session of school counseling. This finding highlights the importance of targeting specific areas of concern through individualized treatment planning.
Assessment should also identify risk and protective factors at individual, family, and environmental levels. Understanding a student’s social skills, emotional regulation capacities, support systems, and coping strategies informs the development of appropriate interventions. For students who perpetrate bullying, assessment should explore motivations, attitudes toward aggression, empathy deficits, and underlying emotional or behavioral concerns.
Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions
Cognitive-behavioral interventions for anxious adolescent boys who had experienced bullying at school showed preliminary support, addressing the co-occurrence of bullying victimization and anxiety symptoms. CBT approaches help students identify and modify maladaptive thought patterns, develop emotion regulation skills, and practice new behavioral responses.
For victims of bullying, cognitive restructuring addresses distorted beliefs such as self-blame, helplessness, and negative self-perceptions. Skills training focuses on assertiveness, social problem-solving, and coping strategies. Exposure-based techniques may help students gradually face anxiety-provoking social situations with support and preparation. Relaxation training and mindfulness practices provide tools for managing stress and emotional reactivity.
For students who bully others, CBT targets thinking errors that justify aggressive behavior, such as blaming victims or minimizing harm. Interventions develop empathy through perspective-taking exercises, teach alternative problem-solving strategies, and address underlying emotional regulation difficulties. Anger management techniques help students identify triggers and develop appropriate responses to frustration or perceived provocation.
Social Skills Training and Group Counseling
Social skills training is an approach for school-aged children that improves communication, problem-solving, decision-making, self-management, and peer relations, with research finding that social skills intervention could improve self-esteem and self-efficacy while reducing social anxiety in students exposed to bullying. Group counseling provides an ideal format for practicing social skills in a supportive environment.
Group interventions allow students to learn from peers, practice new skills through role-playing, and receive feedback in a safe setting. Groups may focus on friendship skills, conflict resolution, assertiveness training, or emotional literacy. For victims of bullying, group counseling reduces isolation and provides opportunities to connect with others who share similar experiences. For students exhibiting bullying behaviors, carefully structured groups can challenge antisocial attitudes and develop prosocial alternatives.
Social intelligence counseling intervention represents an integrative approach that enhances the capacity to know oneself and others, with programs showing effectiveness in empowering students to accomplish their goals and achieve mental well-being by introducing necessary changes in their ways of thinking, feeling, and behaving. Such interventions specifically target the interpersonal understanding that underlies both perpetration and victimization.
Supporting Victims and Building Resilience
Individual counseling with victims of bullying must address both immediate safety concerns and longer-term psychological impacts. Despite the potential for psychological intervention to improve mental health outcomes for bullying victims, a specific framework and psychological intervention for bullying victimization has been lacking, with proposed models adopting a developmental perspective to support victims in ways that protect mental health.
Resilience-building interventions help students develop personal strengths, coping strategies, and support networks that buffer against the negative effects of bullying. Counselors work to enhance students’ self-esteem, self-efficacy, and sense of belonging. Problem-solving skills training empowers students to identify options for responding to bullying situations safely and effectively.
Activities beneficial in building resilience and coping abilities include training guided by health specialists such as psychologists and nurses, who help children improve their skills by offering support and counseling services during the training process. These interventions may include psychoeducation about bullying, stress management techniques, social support enhancement, and strategies for seeking help from trusted adults.
Addressing Perpetration
Training students who occasionally bully to be peer advocates through bystander intervention has shown promise as an approach to bullying prevention, with students in STAC intervention groups reporting significantly lower levels of bullying perpetration compared to control groups. This finding suggests that involving students who bully in positive peer roles may redirect their social influence toward prosocial ends.
Individual counseling with students who perpetrate bullying requires a balance between accountability and support. Counselors help students understand the impact of their actions while addressing underlying factors such as difficulties with empathy, emotion regulation challenges, or social skills deficits. Interventions may include empathy development exercises, anger management training, social problem-solving instruction, and family involvement.
Integrative counseling programs developed through the eclecticism technique integrate various effective techniques from different existing theories, including person-centered counseling theory, Gestalt counseling theory, and behavior counseling theory, offering flexibility not limited to specific theories or behavioral therapies. This integrative approach recognizes that bullying behaviors may stem from diverse problems requiring varied intervention strategies.
Restorative Practices in Bullying Prevention
Foundations of Restorative Approaches
Restorative justice and restorative practices are oriented not only at the alternative management of incorrect and violent behaviors such as bullying, but mainly at the promotion of prosocial behaviors through the development of social and emotional skills such as empathy, awareness, and responsibility, with the broader goal of building safe school communities that promote well-being.
Restorative practices represent a paradigm shift from punitive discipline to an emphasis on repairing harm, restoring relationships, and building community. Rather than focusing solely on punishment, restorative approaches bring together those affected by an incident to understand the harm caused, take responsibility, and develop plans for making amends and preventing future occurrences.
The philosophical foundation rests on several key principles: crime and conflict are violations of relationships; violations create obligations to make things right; and the people most affected should be involved in the resolution process. In school settings, these principles translate into practices that involve students, families, and school personnel in collaborative problem-solving and relationship repair.
Implementing Restorative Practices
The most used restorative practices in schools are circles, followed by restorative conferences, peer mediation, restorative conversations, mediation, and community-building circles. Each practice serves different purposes and can be applied preventively or in response to incidents.
Restorative circles provide safe spaces for open dialogue where students share feelings and experiences. These circles foster empathy as students get to understand the impact of their actions on others, with schools that regularly use restorative circles reporting improved relationships among students and a decrease in recurring bullying incidents. Community-building circles conducted regularly help establish positive relationships and shared norms before conflicts arise.
Restorative conferences involve structured meetings between those who have caused harm and those affected, facilitated by a trained adult. Face-to-face meetings are sometimes held to engage all persons affected by the bullying as an occasion for all to hear the harm and plan steps to accountability and reintegration, though persons harmed by bullying may not wish to face the person who harmed them fearing further victimization, in which situations a face-to-face meeting may not be advisable. Careful assessment and preparation are essential to ensure conferences are appropriate and safe.
Restorative Questions, while varied in exact language, ask the student to consider: what happened, who did it impact, and how do you make it right, with the intention of repairing the wrong that happened as a result of the behavior. These questions guide reflection and accountability while maintaining focus on relationship repair rather than punishment.
Evidence of Effectiveness
Restorative practices can improve school climate, discipline, and positive conflict management through actions that aim at preventing suspensions, exclusions, conflicts, and misbehaviors such as bullying, while promoting positive relationships between peers and between students and teachers, prosocial behaviors, social and emotional skills, and school-community-family ties.
A cluster randomized controlled trial investigating whether a restorative practice initiative improved school climate found that when students reported that their teachers used restorative practices more often, they also reported a more positive school climate, with authors concluding that restorative practice initiatives have promise for fostering positive climates if used consistently. This finding emphasizes that implementation quality and consistency matter more than merely adopting a program.
A report published by the Department for Education gave whole-school restorative approaches the highest rating of effectiveness at preventing bullying, with a survey of schools showing 97% rated restorative approaches as effective, while an independent evaluation found that restorative justice improved school attendance and reduced exclusion rates. These positive outcomes extend beyond bullying reduction to broader improvements in school functioning.
Integration with Other Approaches
Organizations working in bullying prevention and restorative practices, which had been operating in parallel, are beginning to come together, with guidance suggesting ways restorative practices and bullying prevention can be employed in tandem. This integration recognizes that prevention and response strategies complement rather than compete with each other.
Restorative practices align well with comprehensive bullying prevention programs by addressing the relational aspects of bullying that punitive approaches often miss. While prevention programs establish norms and teach skills, restorative practices provide mechanisms for addressing violations of those norms in ways that strengthen rather than fracture community bonds. The combination creates a coherent framework spanning prevention through intervention.
Cyberbullying Prevention and Intervention
Unique Characteristics and Challenges
Cyberbullying presents distinct challenges that require specialized prevention and intervention approaches. Unlike traditional bullying, cyberbullying can occur at any time, reach large audiences instantly, allow anonymous perpetration, and create permanent digital records of harassment. The removal of physical presence may reduce inhibitions, leading some students to engage in behaviors online that they would not exhibit in person.
The intersection of cyberbullying with traditional bullying complicates intervention efforts. Many students who experience face-to-face bullying also experience cyberbullying, and perpetrators often use multiple platforms to target victims. Additionally, the role of technology companies, legal frameworks regarding online speech, and parental monitoring of digital activities introduce considerations beyond the school’s direct control.
Prevention Strategies
Comprehensive cyberbullying prevention integrates digital citizenship education into the curriculum. Students need instruction in appropriate online behavior, the potential consequences of digital harassment, and strategies for protecting themselves and others in online spaces. Digital literacy includes understanding privacy settings, recognizing manipulation tactics, and critically evaluating online information.
By fostering a culture of responsible online behavior, schools can help prevent cyberbullying and create a more positive digital environment for all students, with workshops and informational sessions helping adults stay informed about the latest trends in social media and online communication, enabling them to provide better guidance and support to young people navigating the digital world. Parent and educator education represents a critical component, as adults must understand the platforms and communication methods students use.
School policies should clearly define cyberbullying, outline prohibited behaviors, and specify consequences while emphasizing support for victims. Policies must balance student safety with privacy rights and address incidents occurring both on and off campus when they impact the school environment. Clear reporting mechanisms and responsive administrative action demonstrate institutional commitment to addressing cyberbullying.
Intervention Approaches
The KiVa Antibullying Program appears to be efficacious in addressing cyber forms of bullying and victimization, with students in the intervention condition reporting lower frequencies of cybervictimization at posttest, while the effect on perpetration of cyberbullying was moderated by age. This finding suggests that comprehensive school-based programs can effectively address cyberbullying alongside traditional forms.
Individual counseling for cyberbullying victims addresses both the technological and psychological aspects of the experience. Counselors help students document incidents, implement safety measures (such as blocking perpetrators and adjusting privacy settings), and report harassment to appropriate authorities. Emotional support addresses feelings of violation, helplessness, and fear while building coping strategies and resilience.
For perpetrators of cyberbullying, interventions must address the specific characteristics of online aggression. Students may need education about the permanence of digital communications, legal consequences of certain behaviors, and the real harm caused despite physical distance from victims. Empathy development exercises help bridge the emotional disconnect that online communication can create.
Collaboration and Systemic Approaches
Effective cyberbullying intervention requires collaboration among schools, families, technology companies, and sometimes law enforcement. Schools must establish protocols for responding to reports, determining appropriate consequences, and supporting affected students. Parents need guidance on monitoring their children’s online activities while respecting privacy, establishing family rules about technology use, and responding to concerning behaviors.
Mental health professionals play a vital role in addressing the emotional and psychological effects of bullying on both victims and perpetrators, with schools striving to provide accessible counseling services that offer a safe space for students to discuss their experiences. This support extends to cyberbullying situations, where the pervasive nature of digital harassment may intensify psychological impacts.
The Role of School Counselors in Bullying Prevention
Leadership and Coordination
School counselors serve as natural leaders in bullying prevention efforts due to their training in child development, counseling theory, and systems change. Counselors can coordinate school-wide prevention programs, train staff in recognizing and responding to bullying, facilitate implementation of evidence-based curricula, and monitor program fidelity and outcomes.
Professional consultation to school administrators and staff on evidence-based policies and practices and training for teachers, counselors, and staff on how to identify and respond to aggressive or bullying behaviors or signs of victimization represents an essential component of comprehensive prevention. Counselors’ expertise in behavioral interventions and relationship dynamics positions them to provide this consultation effectively.
Coordinating bullying prevention requires assessment of school needs, selection of appropriate interventions, development of implementation plans, training of staff and students, ongoing monitoring of progress, and adjustment of strategies based on data. Counselors facilitate collaboration among stakeholders, ensure interventions align with existing initiatives, and advocate for resources necessary for program success.
Direct Service Delivery
School counselors deliver bullying prevention content through classroom guidance lessons, small group counseling, and individual interventions. Classroom lessons teach students about bullying definitions, its impact, bystander roles, and strategies for prevention and response. These universal interventions reach all students with consistent messages and establish school-wide norms against bullying.
The STAC program was developed to be delivered by school counselors during classroom lessons, establishing school counselors as leaders in bullying curriculum delivery. By taking responsibility for these lessons, counselors ensure quality implementation while demonstrating their commitment to creating safe school environments.
Small group counseling provides targeted support for students at increased risk or exhibiting early warning signs. Groups may focus on social skills development, friendship building, conflict resolution, or emotion management. Individual counseling addresses the specific needs of students significantly affected by bullying involvement, whether as victims, perpetrators, or both.
Consultation and Collaboration
School counselors consult with teachers to help them recognize bullying, respond effectively to incidents, and create classroom environments that discourage bullying. Consultation may address classroom management strategies, student-teacher relationship building, and implementation of prevention curricula. Counselors also help teachers understand the distinction between bullying and other forms of peer conflict, ensuring appropriate responses to different situations.
Family engagement represents another critical counseling function. Counselors educate parents about bullying, provide strategies for discussing bullying with their children, and collaborate on intervention plans when students are involved in bullying situations. Parent education programs may cover recognizing signs that a child is being bullied or bullying others, supporting children through bullying experiences, and partnering with schools in prevention efforts.
Collaboration with community resources extends counseling support beyond the school setting. Mental health providers, juvenile justice programs, and community organizations may offer specialized services for students with complex needs. Counselors facilitate referrals, coordinate care, and maintain communication to ensure comprehensive support.
Data-Driven Practice
Effective bullying prevention requires systematic data collection and analysis to guide decision-making. School counselors collect data on bullying prevalence, types, locations, and populations affected through surveys, incident reports, and behavioral observations. This information identifies areas requiring targeted intervention, monitors trends over time, and evaluates program effectiveness.
Outcome evaluation assesses whether prevention efforts achieve desired results. Counselors examine changes in bullying rates, school climate indicators, student perceptions of safety, and academic outcomes. Process evaluation monitors implementation fidelity, participation rates, and stakeholder satisfaction. Data analysis informs program modifications, resource allocation, and communication with stakeholders about progress.
School counselors use data to demonstrate accountability and advocate for resources. By documenting the prevalence and impact of bullying, counselors make compelling arguments for prevention programming, adequate staffing, and professional development. Evidence of program effectiveness supports continuation and expansion of successful initiatives while guiding refinement of less effective approaches.
Cultural Competence and Equity in Bullying Prevention
Understanding Diverse Experiences
Cultural competence in bullying prevention counseling requires understanding how identity, culture, and social context shape bullying experiences. Students from marginalized groups often experience bias-based bullying related to race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, or other characteristics. These experiences carry unique psychological impacts and require culturally responsive interventions.
LGBTQ+ students face particularly elevated risks, with significantly higher rates of both school-based and electronic bullying compared to their heterosexual and cisgender peers. Prevention efforts must explicitly address bias-based harassment, create inclusive environments, and provide affirming support. This includes training staff to recognize and respond to identity-based bullying, establishing Gay-Straight Alliances or similar student groups, and implementing inclusive policies and curricula.
Students with disabilities represent another population requiring specialized attention. Both visible and invisible disabilities may become targets for bullying, and some students with disabilities may also perpetrate bullying due to social skills deficits or difficulty interpreting social situations. Interventions must be adapted to meet individual learning needs while addressing disability-related bullying through education and advocacy.
Culturally Responsive Approaches
Culturally responsive bullying prevention acknowledges how cultural values regarding conflict, authority, communication, and collectivism versus individualism influence both bullying behaviors and appropriate interventions. Some cultures emphasize indirect communication and face-saving, which affects how students and families discuss bullying. Others prioritize family honor or collective reputation over individual concerns, shaping help-seeking behaviors.
Counselors must adapt assessment and intervention approaches to align with students’ cultural backgrounds. This includes using culturally appropriate communication styles, involving family members in ways consistent with cultural norms, and recognizing diverse definitions of respect and appropriate behavior. Materials and examples should reflect students’ cultural experiences and avoid stereotyping or cultural bias.
Language access ensures that non-English-speaking families can fully participate in prevention efforts and support their children. Schools should provide interpretation services, translate important communications, and employ bilingual staff when possible. Counselors must recognize that language barriers may prevent students and families from reporting bullying or accessing support services.
Addressing Systemic Inequities
Effective bullying prevention recognizes that broader systemic inequities contribute to bullying behaviors and experiences. Discrimination, marginalization, and unequal access to resources create conditions where bullying thrives. Prevention efforts must address not only individual behaviors but also institutional practices and policies that perpetuate inequity.
Examining discipline data through an equity lens reveals whether students from different backgrounds receive disparate treatment for similar behaviors. Restorative practices offer alternatives to exclusionary discipline that disproportionately affects students of color. Training staff in implicit bias, cultural competence, and trauma-informed practices promotes equitable responses to all students.
Creating inclusive school climates requires proactive celebration of diversity, explicit teaching about respect for differences, and immediate intervention when bias-based incidents occur. Curricula should include diverse perspectives and experiences, and school leadership should demonstrate commitment to equity through policies, practices, and resource allocation. When students see their identities reflected and valued, they develop stronger connections to school and experience less marginalization.
Collaborative Partnerships in Bullying Prevention
Family Engagement
Family involvement significantly enhances bullying prevention effectiveness. Parents and caregivers need information about recognizing signs of bullying involvement, communicating with their children about bullying, and partnering with schools in prevention and intervention. School counselors facilitate family engagement through workshops, resource distribution, and individual consultation.
Parent education programs address common questions and concerns. Topics may include understanding bullying definitions and dynamics, developmental considerations in bullying behavior, effective communication strategies with children, appropriate responses to bullying situations, collaboration with schools, and supporting children’s social-emotional development. Programs should be offered at various times and locations to maximize accessibility.
| Program | Origin | Target Population | Key Components | Implementation Duration | Evidence of Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olweus Bullying Prevention Program | Norway | Whole school (elementary through high school) | School-wide rules and consequences; classroom meetings; individual interventions; parent involvement | Ongoing (18+ months for full implementation) | Reduces bullying by 18-19%; reduces victimization by 15-16%; longitudinal effects strengthen over time |
| KiVa Antibullying Program | Finland | Elementary and middle school | Universal student lessons on empathy and bystander behavior; indicated actions through KiVa teams; online game and learning environment | 9 months initial implementation; ongoing reinforcement | Reduces victimization and perpetration; decreases cyberbullying; increases defending behaviors |
| STAC Bystander Intervention | United States | Middle and high school students | 90-minute training in four defender strategies (Stealing the show, Turning it over, Accompanying others, Coaching compassion); booster sessions | 90 minutes plus two 15-minute boosters | Increases defender knowledge and confidence; reduces victimization and perpetration; improves mental health outcomes |
| Second Step | United States | Preschool through middle school | Social-emotional learning curriculum including empathy, emotion management, and problem-solving | Weekly lessons throughout school year | Prevents school bullying on 50% of examined outcomes; improves prosocial behaviors and emotional regulation |
| Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) | United States | Whole school (all grade levels) | Three-tier framework; clear behavioral expectations; teaching appropriate behaviors; acknowledging positive behavior | Multi-year implementation | Improves student discipline and school climate; shows promise for bullying reduction |
Table 1: Comparison of Major Evidence-Based Bullying Prevention Programs
When students are involved in bullying incidents, family collaboration becomes essential. Counselors meet with families to share information, develop consistent home-school interventions, and monitor progress. These partnerships require sensitivity to family circumstances, cultural backgrounds, and emotional reactions. Some parents may feel defensive, ashamed, or overwhelmed, requiring counselors to balance accountability with support.
Teacher and Staff Training
Teachers and school staff serve as the first line of defense in bullying prevention and intervention. They supervise students throughout the school day, observe peer interactions, and respond to incidents. Comprehensive training ensures staff can recognize bullying, distinguish it from other conflicts, implement prevention strategies, and respond effectively to incidents.
Training content should include bullying definitions and forms, developmental aspects of bullying behavior, school policies and procedures, supervision and monitoring strategies, classroom management techniques that prevent bullying, appropriate responses to bullying incidents, and support for students involved in bullying. Regular refresher training maintains awareness and introduces new strategies.
Creating shared responsibility among all staff members reinforces prevention efforts. Cafeteria workers, bus drivers, custodians, and office personnel all have roles in supervision, intervention, and climate building. When all adults demonstrate commitment to preventing bullying, students receive consistent messages and support throughout their school experience.
Community Partnerships
Community organizations offer resources that extend and enhance school-based bullying prevention. Mental health agencies provide specialized counseling for students with complex needs. Law enforcement collaborates on incidents involving criminal behavior or threats to safety. Youth development organizations offer positive activities that build protective factors and social connections.
Faith communities, civic organizations, and businesses can support bullying prevention through awareness campaigns, volunteer programs, and resource provision. Community-wide approaches create environments where bullying prevention extends beyond school walls into broader social contexts. These partnerships demonstrate collective commitment to child well-being and safety.
Technology companies and digital platforms represent increasingly important partners in addressing cyberbullying. Schools can collaborate with these entities to educate students about reporting mechanisms, privacy protections, and community standards. Some companies offer educational resources or technical support for schools implementing cyberbullying prevention.
Evaluation and Continuous Improvement
Assessing School Climate
School climate assessment provides essential data for bullying prevention efforts. Climate encompasses students’ perceptions of safety, relationships, teaching and learning, and institutional environment. Positive school climate correlates with reduced bullying and improved student outcomes across multiple domains.
Climate surveys administered regularly to students, staff, and families identify strengths and areas requiring improvement. Questions address sense of belonging, safety perceptions, quality of relationships, fairness of discipline, engagement in learning, and prevalence of bullying and other problem behaviors. Disaggregating data by student demographics reveals whether all groups experience positive climate equally.
School counselors analyze climate data to inform prevention planning and track progress over time. Improvements in climate indicators suggest that prevention efforts are succeeding in creating more positive environments. Declining scores or persistent disparities signal need for targeted interventions or program modifications.
Measuring Program Outcomes
Outcome evaluation determines whether bullying prevention programs achieve intended results. Multiple measures provide comprehensive assessment of program impact. These may include changes in bullying perpetration and victimization rates, student knowledge and attitudes regarding bullying, bystander intervention behaviors, disciplinary referrals related to bullying, attendance and academic performance, and mental health indicators.
Both quantitative and qualitative data contribute to outcome evaluation. Surveys and administrative data offer numerical indicators of change, while focus groups, interviews, and open-ended survey responses provide deeper understanding of program experiences and impacts. Longitudinal data collection tracks sustained effects beyond immediate post-intervention periods.
Comparison of outcomes across schools or grade levels implementing different approaches identifies most effective strategies. When resources limit comprehensive programming, evaluation data guide prioritization toward interventions with strongest evidence of effectiveness. Sharing evaluation results with stakeholders builds support for successful programs and informs refinement of less effective ones.
Continuous Quality Improvement
Continuous improvement processes ensure that bullying prevention efforts evolve based on data and emerging research. Regular review of implementation fidelity identifies whether programs are delivered as designed or require additional support. Fidelity monitoring may include observation of lessons, review of documentation, surveys of implementers, and participation tracking.
Barriers to effective implementation must be identified and addressed. Common obstacles include inadequate training, insufficient time, lack of administrative support, staff turnover, and competing priorities. Problem-solving teams develop strategies to overcome these barriers, such as providing additional professional development, allocating protected time for prevention activities, or integrating prevention into existing structures.
Staying current with research ensures that prevention strategies reflect best practices. School counselors review professional literature, attend conferences, and participate in professional learning communities focused on bullying prevention. Emerging evidence guides adoption of new approaches and refinement of existing practices. This commitment to evidence-based practice maximizes the likelihood that prevention efforts will achieve meaningful results.
Emerging Trends and Future Directions
Technology-Enhanced Interventions
Technology offers new possibilities for bullying prevention and intervention. Online training modules provide flexible professional development for staff. Mobile applications support student reporting of bullying incidents, deliver coping strategies, and connect students with resources. Virtual reality simulations allow students to practice bystander intervention in realistic scenarios without real-world risks.
Social media platforms themselves serve as venues for prevention messaging and peer support. Student-led campaigns using hashtags, videos, and other digital content spread anti-bullying messages and promote positive online behavior. Schools must balance leveraging technology’s benefits while addressing its risks, including cyberbullying and excessive screen time.
Artificial intelligence and machine learning may enhance early detection of bullying through analysis of digital communications, though significant ethical and privacy concerns require careful consideration. Such technologies should supplement rather than replace human judgment and relationship-based intervention. Any technological tools must be implemented with attention to equity, ensuring all students benefit regardless of digital access or literacy.
Trauma-Informed Approaches
Growing recognition of trauma’s prevalence and impact informs bullying prevention and intervention. Many students involved in bullying, whether as victims or perpetrators, have experienced trauma that influences their behavior and needs. Trauma-informed approaches recognize these experiences and adapt practices accordingly.
Trauma-informed schools prioritize safety, trustworthiness, peer support, collaboration, empowerment, and cultural competence. Rather than asking “What’s wrong with you?” trauma-informed approaches ask “What happened to you?” This shift promotes understanding over judgment and addresses underlying causes of behavior rather than simply managing symptoms.
For bullying intervention, trauma-informed practice means recognizing that aggressive behavior may represent a trauma response, that victimization may trigger past trauma, and that interventions must account for how trauma affects emotional regulation, relationships, and sense of safety. Counselors trained in trauma-informed care can better support students while avoiding re-traumatization through insensitive practices.
Social-Emotional Learning Integration
The integration of social-emotional learning with bullying prevention creates comprehensive approaches addressing underlying skill deficits. SEL competencies including self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making directly relate to bullying prevention and intervention.
Students with strong SEL skills demonstrate greater empathy, emotional regulation, conflict resolution abilities, and ethical judgment—all protective factors against bullying involvement. Universal SEL instruction builds a foundation supporting specific bullying prevention efforts. When students possess the social and emotional competencies needed for positive relationships, bullying becomes less likely.
Many evidence-based bullying prevention programs incorporate SEL components, recognizing that preventing bullying requires developing students’ social and emotional capacities. This integration creates coherent programming rather than competing initiatives, making efficient use of limited instructional time while addressing related outcomes.
Focus on Positive Youth Development
Positive youth development approaches emphasize building strengths rather than solely preventing problems. These approaches cultivate protective factors including supportive relationships, opportunities for meaningful participation, skill development, and recognition. When students experience these developmental supports, bullying and other problem behaviors decrease.
Bullying prevention grounded in positive youth development focuses on creating environments where all students can thrive. Rather than emphasizing only what not to do, these approaches help students develop positive identities, contribute to their communities, and build meaningful connections. Students become engaged stakeholders in creating positive school climates rather than passive recipients of adult-imposed rules.
Youth voice and participation represent key elements of positive developmental approaches. When students have genuine opportunities to influence decisions, lead prevention initiatives, and contribute their perspectives, they develop ownership and investment in school community. Peer leadership programs, student advisory groups, and youth-adult partnerships harness students’ energy and insights for prevention efforts.
| Student Role | Individual Counseling Focus | Group Counseling Strategies | Systemic Interventions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victims | Safety planning; cognitive restructuring of self-blame; coping skills development; assertiveness training; building support networks | Peer support groups; social skills training; resilience building; shared experience validation | Increase adult supervision; improve reporting mechanisms; provide safe spaces; family consultation |
| Perpetrators | Empathy development; anger management; cognitive behavioral approaches to distorted thinking; social problem-solving; accountability | Prosocial skills training; perspective-taking exercises; conflict resolution; consequences and responsibility | Consistent discipline with support; restorative conferences; parent collaboration; positive behavior reinforcement |
| Bystanders | Bystander intervention training (STAC); overcoming barriers to intervention; safety considerations | Role-playing intervention strategies; discussing moral responsibility; building collective efficacy | Establish clear expectations for bystander behavior; recognize and reinforce defender actions; create supportive norms |
| Bully-Victims (both roles) | Address both victimization trauma and perpetration behavior; emotional regulation; social skills deficits; comprehensive assessment | Specialized groups addressing dual experiences; emotion management; relationship building; breaking retaliation cycles | Intensive monitoring and support; coordinated intervention across settings; mental health referrals when needed |
Table 2: Bullying Prevention Counseling Strategies by Student Role
Conclusion
Bullying prevention counseling represents an essential component of comprehensive school counseling programs, addressing a pervasive threat to student well-being, safety, and academic success. Effective prevention requires multi-tiered approaches that integrate universal prevention programming, targeted interventions for at-risk students, and intensive individual support for those significantly affected by bullying involvement. Evidence-based programs such as the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program, KiVa, and STAC demonstrate that well-implemented interventions can significantly reduce bullying and victimization while improving school climate.
School counselors serve as leaders, coordinators, and direct service providers in bullying prevention efforts. Their training in child development, counseling theory, and systems change positions them to select appropriate evidence-based interventions, train staff and students, deliver prevention and intervention services, collaborate with families and community partners, and evaluate program effectiveness. Through classroom guidance, small group counseling, individual interventions, consultation, and program coordination, counselors address bullying prevention comprehensively.
Contemporary bullying prevention counseling must address evolving challenges including the dramatic rise in cyberbullying, persistent disparities affecting marginalized student populations, and the integration of trauma-informed and culturally responsive approaches. The field continues advancing through research on effective interventions, integration with social-emotional learning and positive youth development, and incorporation of restorative practices that repair harm while building community.
Future directions emphasize prevention efforts grounded in creating positive school climates where all students experience safety, belonging, and opportunity for meaningful participation. Technology offers both challenges and opportunities, requiring thoughtful integration that leverages benefits while addressing risks. Continued research, evaluation, and dissemination of evidence-based practices will strengthen bullying prevention counseling’s capacity to protect students and promote thriving school communities.
Ultimately, effective bullying prevention requires sustained commitment from all members of the school community—students, educators, families, and community partners—working together to create environments where every student can learn, grow, and develop free from harassment and harm. School counselors facilitate this collective effort through their unique combination of clinical skills, educational expertise, and systems-level perspective, making them indispensable leaders in the ongoing work of bullying prevention.
References
American Psychological Association. (2024). APA resolution on bullying among children and youth. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/resolution-bullying.pdf
Arslan, G. (2018). Exploring the effects of posttraumatic growth experiences on school belonging and psychological well-being in children and adolescents. Child Indicators Research, 11(5), 1721-1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9509-1
Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). Translating research to practice in bullying prevention. American Psychologist, 70(4), 322-332. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039114
Brank, E. M., Hoetger, L. A., & Hazen, K. P. (2012). Bullying. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 213-230. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173820
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Youth Risk Behavior Survey data summary & trends report: 2013-2023. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/index.htm
Choi, K. S., Earl, K., Lee, J. R., & Cho, S. (2019). Diagnosis of cyber and non-physical bullying victimization: A lifestyles and routine activities theory approach to constructing effective preventative measures. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.014
Cyberbullying Research Center. (2023). 2023 cyberbullying data. https://cyberbullying.org/2023-data
Díaz-Aguado, M. J., Martínez-Arias, R., & Martín, J. (2021). Adolescents’ peer victimization: ADHD symptoms and contextual and individual variables. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 21(1), 100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.100207
Evans, C. B., Fraser, M. W., & Cotter, K. L. (2014). The effectiveness of school-based bullying prevention programs: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 532-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.004
Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of school-bullying intervention programs globally: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1(1), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-0007-4
Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2021). What works in anti-bullying programs? Analysis of effective intervention components. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.002
Gradinger, P., Yanagida, T., Strohmeier, D., & Spiel, C. (2016). Effectiveness and sustainability of the ViSC social competence program to prevent cyberbullying and cyber-victimization: Class and individual level moderators. Aggressive Behavior, 42(2), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21631
Gregory, A., Clawson, K., Davis, A., & Gerewitz, J. (2016). The promise of restorative practices to transform teacher-student relationships and achieve equity in school discipline. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 26(4), 325-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2014.929950
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2019). Connecting adolescent suicide to the severity of bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 18(3), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2018.1492417
Holt, M. K., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Polanin, J. R., Holland, K. M., DeGue, S., Matjasko, J. L., Wolfe, M., & Reid, G. (2015). Bullying and suicidal ideation and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 135(2), e496-e509. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1864
Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003
Hopkins, B. (2004). Just schools: A whole school approach to restorative justice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. https://www.jkp.com/uk/just-schools.html
Jain, S., Cohen, A. K., Huang, K., Hanson, T. L., & Austin, G. (2015). Inequalities in school climate in California. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(2), 237-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2013-0101
Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 159-185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115030
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Alanen, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). Going to scale: A nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for grades 1-9. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(6), 796-805. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025740
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4-6. Child Development, 82(1), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073-1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
Limber, S. P., Olweus, D., Wang, W., Masiello, M., & Breivik, K. (2018). Evaluation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: A large scale study of U.S. students in grades 3-11. Journal of School Psychology, 69, 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.04.004
Midgett, A., & Doumas, D. M. (2016). Witnessing bullying at school: The association between being a bystander and anxiety and depressive symptoms. School Mental Health, 8(4), 454-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-016-9201-4
Midgett, A., Doumas, D. M., Peralta, C., Bond, L., & Flay, B. (2020). Impact of a brief, bystander bullying prevention program on depressive symptoms, passive suicidal ideation, sense of school belonging, and perception of school climate for students in a racially diverse, low-resource school. Journal of Child and Adolescent Counseling, 6(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23727810.2019.1669372
Midgett, A., Moody, S., Confusion, K., & Frey, L. (2018). The role of school counselors in creating safe and supportive schools for LGBTQ youth. Professional School Counseling, 21(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X18778064
Morrison, B. E., & Vaandering, D. (2012). Restorative justice: Pedagogy, praxis, and discipline. Journal of School Violence, 11(2), 138-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2011.653322
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Preventing bullying through science, policy, and practice. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23482
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Student reports of bullying: Results from the 2021 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2022054
Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2010). Bullying in school: Evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(1), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01015.x
Ortega-Ruiz, R., Zych, I., & Llorent, V. J. (2021). Bullying and cyberbullying in adolescence: Two sides of the same coin? Revista de Psicodidáctica, 26(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2020.12.001
Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087375
Rigby, K., & Barnes, A. (2020). A meta-evaluation of the effectiveness of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program in schools. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 53, 101449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101449
Salmivalli, C. (2014). Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 286-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947222
Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 405-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411407457
Schoeler, T., Duncan, L., Cecil, C. M., Ploubidis, G. B., & Pingault, J. B. (2018). Quasi-experimental evidence on short- and long-term consequences of bullying victimization: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(12), 1229-1246. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000171
Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Göbel, K., Scheithauer, H., Brighi, A., Guarini, A., Tsorbatzoudis, H., Barkoukis, V., Pyzalski, J., Plichta, P., Del Rey, R., Casas, J. A., Thompson, F., & Smith, P. K. (2016). A comparison of classification approaches for cyberbullying and traditional bullying using data from six European countries. Journal of School Violence, 15(1), 60-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.961067
Seeley, K., Tombari, M. L., Bennett, L. J., & Dunkle, J. B. (2011). Bullying in schools: An overview. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/234205.pdf
Smith, P. K., & Berkkun, F. (2017). How research on school bullying has developed. In P. Sturmey (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression (pp. 1-12). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119057574.whbva001
Swearer, S. M., & Hymel, S. (2015). Understanding the psychology of bullying: Moving toward a social-ecological diathesis-stress model. American Psychologist, 70(4), 344-353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038929
Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1
U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Student reports of bullying: Results from the 2019 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2021/2021054.pdf
Van der Ploeg, R., Steglich, C., & Veenstra, R. (2020). The way bullying works: How new ties facilitate the mutual reinforcement of status and bullying in elementary schools. Social Networks, 60, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.12.006
Williford, A., Boulton, A., Noland, B., Little, T. D., Kärnä, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on adolescents’ depression, anxiety, and perception of peers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(2), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9551-1
Yeager, D. S., Fong, C. J., Lee, H. Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2015). Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005
Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Del Rey, R. (2015). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: Facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.10.001