Blended Family Counseling

Blended family counseling is a specialized form of family therapy focused on the adjustment, communication, and relational challenges that arise when two family systems unite through remarriage or cohabitation. As blended families have become increasingly common across Western and global societies, counselors face complex dynamics involving step-parenting, loyalty conflicts, and role ambiguity. This article examines the theoretical foundations, psychological mechanisms, and evidence-based counseling interventions for blended families. Emphasis is placed on the ecological, structural, and systemic perspectives that inform therapeutic practice. Empirical findings demonstrate that counseling can strengthen family cohesion, reduce inter-household conflict, and promote healthy attachment among all members. The discussion integrates cultural, developmental, and ethical considerations while identifying best practices for counselors working with diverse blended family structures.

Introduction

The rise of remarriage, divorce, and cohabitation in the past five decades has transformed the landscape of modern family life. According to the Pew Research Center (2015), approximately 16% of children in the United States live in a blended family, defined as a household that includes at least one stepparent, stepsibling, or half-sibling. Comparable trends are evident globally, with blended family systems becoming a normative component of postmodern society (Papernow, 2018). These family structures embody both opportunity and complexity: they can provide emotional renewal and support after previous family disruptions, yet they also introduce new relational, developmental, and identity challenges for all members involved.

From a counseling psychology perspective, blended family counseling addresses the emotional adjustments and role transitions that occur when distinct family subsystems merge. Stepparents may struggle with authority and acceptance, children often experience divided loyalties between biological and stepfamilies, and former partners may continue to influence family functioning through shared custody or co-parenting arrangements. These factors can lead to heightened stress, communication breakdown, and inconsistent parenting practices (Ganong & Coleman, 2017).

Counselors working with blended families must recognize that these systems differ fundamentally from traditional nuclear families in terms of boundaries, hierarchies, and expectations. Therapy must therefore balance empathy for past losses with the construction of new, realistic family narratives. Interventions that promote flexibility, inclusivity, and mutual respect are most successful in helping members adapt to their evolving roles.

Blended families also reflect broader sociocultural transitions, including changing gender norms, extended family involvement, and increased cultural diversity in household composition. Consequently, counseling interventions must be culturally competent and contextually sensitive. The therapeutic process is not merely about resolving conflict but about facilitating the creation of a shared family identity while respecting individual differences and pre-existing attachments.

Conceptual Foundations of Blended Family Counseling

Defining the Blended Family

A blended family, also referred to as a stepfamily or reconstituted family, is a family unit formed when one or both partners bring children from previous relationships into a new marital or cohabiting union. These families can take multiple forms, including simple stepfamilies (one parent with children marrying a partner without children) and complex stepfamilies (both partners have children from prior relationships) (Ganong & Coleman, 2020). Variations also exist across cultural and legal contexts, such as households with shared custody, same-sex stepfamilies, or multigenerational cohabitation.

Blended families typically evolve through several developmental stages. Papernow’s (2013) seven-stage model of stepfamily integration remains one of the most influential frameworks in this domain. It outlines phases from initial fantasy and immersion to awareness, mobilization, action, contact, and eventual resolution. Each stage represents a psychosocial process of adjusting expectations, negotiating roles, and building trust. Understanding where a family falls on this continuum enables counselors to tailor interventions appropriately.

Theoretical Perspectives

Several theoretical frameworks inform the practice of blended family counseling. The Family Systems Theory (Bowen, 1978) emphasizes interdependence among family members, suggesting that changes in one subsystem inevitably affect others. In blended families, shifts in boundaries and hierarchies often trigger systemic reactions such as parent-child coalitions or triangulation. Counselors must therefore assess relational patterns rather than isolated behaviors.

Structural Family Therapy (Minuchin, 1974) provides another foundational model, focusing on the organization of family subsystems and the establishment of clear yet flexible boundaries. Blended families frequently experience boundary confusion: stepparents may be uncertain about their disciplinary authority, while children oscillate between alliances with biological and stepparents. Counselors using structural approaches help families renegotiate hierarchies, align parental subsystems, and clarify roles.

Attachment Theory (Bowlby, 1988) contributes valuable insights into the emotional dynamics of stepfamilies. Children entering a new family system often carry attachment injuries from previous parental separation or loss. Their ambivalence toward stepparents may reflect both fear of betrayal and desire for stability. Counseling interventions guided by attachment principles aim to restore trust through consistent responsiveness, empathy, and validation of emotional needs.

Ecological Systems Theory (Bronfenbrenner, 1979) extends this view by situating blended families within broader contexts—schools, workplaces, extended families, and cultural norms—that influence adaptation. Counselors must therefore consider systemic factors such as socioeconomic pressures, cultural expectations about remarriage, and legal custody arrangements when developing treatment plans.

Psychological Challenges in Blended Families

Adjustment to blended family life is a multidimensional process involving cognitive, emotional, and behavioral adaptation. The following psychological themes frequently emerge in counseling sessions:

1. Loyalty Conflicts: Children may feel torn between allegiance to their biological parent and affection for a stepparent. Expressing closeness to one figure may be perceived as betrayal of another (Fine & Kurdek, 1995).

2. Role Ambiguity: Stepparents often struggle to define their position within the family hierarchy, leading to confusion and resentment. Ambiguity is especially pronounced when discipline or caregiving responsibilities are shared (Ganong et al., 2019).

3. Boundary Negotiation: Establishing healthy boundaries between parental, coparental, and child subsystems can be difficult when ex-partners remain involved or when family rules differ across households.

4. Grief and Loss: Both adults and children may experience unresolved grief related to divorce, death, or family reorganization. Without processing these emotions, new relationships can become burdened by past wounds.

5. Communication Breakdown: Miscommunication and assumptions about fairness, affection, or loyalty frequently undermine cohesion. Open dialogue is essential for reestablishing trust and mutual respect.

Counselors must assess these psychological dimensions alongside contextual stressors such as economic instability or relocation, which often accompany remarriage. Integrating emotional processing with practical problem-solving strategies enhances therapeutic outcomes.

Assessment and Family Dynamics

Effective blended family counseling begins with a comprehensive assessment of family structure, relational history, and communication patterns. The counselor typically conducts individual interviews followed by conjoint sessions to gather multiple perspectives. Genograms are valuable tools for mapping complex relationships, identifying alliances, and visualizing intergenerational influences (McGoldrick et al., 2008).

Assessment should include exploration of each member’s expectations for the new family unit, previous experiences with conflict, and attitudes toward authority. Particular attention should be given to how children perceive the remarriage and the degree of contact with nonresidential parents. Misaligned expectations—such as assuming instant affection or cohesion—are common sources of disappointment and resentment (Papernow, 2018).

Counselors may also use standardized measures to evaluate family functioning and satisfaction. Instruments such as the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES-IV) (Olson, 2011) and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) (Spanier, 1976) provide quantitative data that complement qualitative insights.

Assessment results inform treatment planning, helping counselors identify which subsystems require the most immediate attention—often the stepparent-child relationship or the coparental alliance between partners. By establishing clear therapeutic goals early, counselors can guide families through structured processes of clarification, empathy building, and shared problem solving.

Counseling Interventions for Blended Families

Counseling interventions for blended families must be flexible, inclusive, and sensitive to the diverse configurations and emotional histories present in these households. Effective interventions are guided by systemic thinking, emphasizing relational patterns and family roles rather than isolated individuals. Blended family counseling typically unfolds over several stages, beginning with stabilization, followed by restructuring, and culminating in integration. Each stage requires tailored strategies that address communication, trust, and the development of shared family norms.

During the stabilization stage, the counselor helps family members acknowledge the uniqueness of their new system while normalizing the challenges they encounter. Interventions focus on managing expectations and validating feelings of loss, confusion, or resentment. Early sessions may involve psychoeducation about common stepfamily adjustment patterns and open discussions of myths, such as the assumption that love and cohesion will develop immediately. Empathy exercises, including narrative sharing or emotion mapping, can promote understanding across subsystems. For instance, parents may articulate their fears of rejection by stepchildren, while children express ambivalence about accepting new authority figures (Papernow, 2013).

The restructuring stage involves active modification of communication and behavior patterns. Structural interventions are particularly useful here, helping the family clarify hierarchies, align parental subsystems, and create consistent boundaries. Counselors may employ mapping exercises to visualize household rules and responsibilities, ensuring that each member understands their role. Family meetings facilitated by the counselor provide structured opportunities to negotiate new norms collaboratively. Research indicates that families who engage in shared decision-making exhibit greater satisfaction and stability than those with top-down rule imposition (Ganong & Coleman, 2017).

In the integration stage, the focus shifts toward fostering cohesion and developing a shared family identity. Counselors encourage rituals, traditions, and collective problem-solving that strengthen emotional bonds. For example, family storytelling sessions or joint leisure activities can help construct positive shared memories. Celebrating progress reinforces unity and helps replace previous narratives of loss or fragmentation with a sense of belonging and continuity.

Communication and Conflict-Resolution Strategies

Communication is the cornerstone of successful blended family counseling, as miscommunication often fuels resentment and distance among members. Counselors train families in active listening, assertive expression, and conflict-resolution skills to improve relational functioning. Techniques such as the “speaker-listener” method, adapted from couples therapy, encourage turn-taking and reflective feedback, ensuring that each member feels heard and validated (Gottman & Silver, 2015).

Another crucial communication skill involves distinguishing between intent and impact. Family members frequently misinterpret messages due to emotional sensitivities or assumptions rooted in prior family experiences. Counselors guide clients in clarifying their intentions and acknowledging the subjective realities of others. For example, a stepparent’s attempt to set boundaries may be perceived as rejection by a child accustomed to different household norms. Through reflective dialogue, misunderstandings can be reframed as opportunities for empathy rather than confrontation.

Conflict-resolution interventions are also integral to blended family therapy. Counselors help members identify recurring conflict themes—such as discipline, loyalty, or resource allocation—and explore their underlying meanings. Techniques from emotionally focused therapy (EFT) (Johnson, 2004) allow families to recognize attachment needs behind anger or withdrawal. When members learn to express vulnerability instead of blame, defensive patterns often diminish.

Structured problem-solving sessions teach families to separate issue discussion from emotional escalation. Counselors encourage the use of “I-statements,” focusing on personal experiences rather than accusations, and promote collaborative negotiation rather than hierarchical decision-making. Over time, these skills generalize beyond therapy, enhancing day-to-day communication and reducing the recurrence of conflict.

Counselors must also address the role of nonresidential parents and extended family in communication patterns. Cross-household interactions can either support or undermine the new family system. Clear co-parenting communication protocols—such as consistent schedules, respectful digital exchanges, and neutral language—help minimize triangulation and protect children from loyalty conflicts (Afifi et al., 2015). In some cases, counselors facilitate joint sessions involving ex-partners to mediate specific issues like discipline consistency or visitation boundaries.

Step-Parenting Dynamics and Role Negotiation

The stepparent role represents one of the most complex and emotionally charged dynamics in blended family counseling. Unlike biological parents, stepparents often lack automatic authority or unconditional acceptance from children. Their success depends on establishing relationships based on respect, patience, and gradual trust-building. Counselors play a critical role in helping stepparents understand that attachment is a process, not a given.

One of the most common misconceptions addressed in therapy is the expectation of “instant love.” Counselors guide stepparents to adopt a more realistic approach focused on developing companionship before asserting authority. Early over-discipline or attempts to replace a biological parent often backfire, generating resentment and resistance. Instead, counselors encourage stepparents to adopt a supportive ally role during the initial stages, gradually participating in rule enforcement once trust has formed (Ganong et al., 2019).

Role clarification exercises are essential tools in this process. Through guided discussions, families delineate boundaries around decision-making, discipline, and affection. A useful intervention involves constructing a “family role matrix,” which lists each member’s perceived and desired responsibilities. Comparing these matrices across members reveals discrepancies and areas for negotiation. This activity enhances transparency and reduces assumptions that often fuel conflict.

Step-parenting challenges are further compounded by differences in parenting styles between the biological parent and the new partner. These discrepancies can produce inconsistent discipline and confusion for children. Counselors facilitate alignment by helping partners establish shared values and behavioral expectations. Joint parenting plans serve as living documents that outline consequences, routines, and privileges across both households.

For biological parents, the counseling process may involve balancing loyalty to their children with commitment to the new partner. Counselors help them navigate this tension by promoting empathy and boundary-setting. Parents are encouraged to validate their children’s emotions without undermining the authority of the stepparent. Open family discussions about loyalty and change can prevent triangulation and strengthen trust in both relationships.

Counselors also address the needs of adult stepchildren and multigenerational stepfamilies, where issues of inheritance, caregiving, and autonomy emerge. In these contexts, interventions must respect the developmental independence of adult children while facilitating cooperative relationships among new family members. Family-of-origin influences and unresolved parental grief often resurface during these transitions, requiring counselors to balance systemic exploration with individual emotional processing.

Coparenting and Boundary Management

Successful blended family counseling requires explicit attention to coparenting relationships, which extend beyond the immediate household. Counselors help families establish clear, consistent boundaries that support stability and reduce cross-household tension. Coparenting dynamics between biological parents and their new partners significantly influence children’s emotional adjustment. High-conflict coparenting environments are associated with increased anxiety, behavioral problems, and academic difficulties among children (Afifi & Schrodt, 2003).

Counselors use boundary-mapping exercises to distinguish between parental, spousal, and stepparental roles. The goal is to prevent role confusion and maintain parental alliances where appropriate. For instance, biological parents may coordinate decision-making about education and health, while stepparents provide emotional and logistical support without overstepping. Counseling sessions often include the creation of written coparenting agreements, which define responsibilities, communication rules, and conflict-resolution procedures.

Joint counseling involving both households can be effective when tension arises over shared custody or scheduling. Neutral facilitation allows parties to focus on the child’s well-being rather than personal grievances. Counselors emphasize the principle of “parallel parenting”—a structured approach that minimizes direct conflict by allowing each parent to manage their household independently while maintaining basic consistency in expectations (Ahrons, 2007).

Boundary management also extends to relationships with extended family members. Grandparents, in-laws, and former partners may exert strong influence over family cohesion or division. Counselors encourage families to establish respectful inclusion criteria, ensuring that external relationships enhance rather than disrupt the new family identity. Rituals such as joint celebrations or family meetings can provide symbolic closure to old dynamics and reinforce unity in the new household.

Family Identity Formation

Creating a cohesive blended family identity is both the outcome and ongoing process of counseling. Families often struggle with how to balance individuality and togetherness while honoring past relationships. Counselors facilitate discussions around shared values, traditions, and narratives that reflect the family’s collective goals. The development of family rituals—such as weekly dinners, shared hobbies, or new holiday customs—can foster belonging and continuity (Nichols & Tafuri, 2013).

Narrative therapy techniques are particularly effective in helping blended families redefine their stories. Members are invited to externalize problems (“the confusion,” “the distance,” “the anger”) and collaboratively rewrite their family narrative from one of disruption to one of growth. By co-constructing positive narratives, families enhance resilience and meaning-making.

Counselors should also be attentive to language use. Terms such as “my stepchild” or “your kids” can perpetuate division, whereas inclusive language like “our family” or using first names can promote unity. Over time, the process of shared storytelling, rituals, and mutual validation strengthens emotional bonds and cultivates an authentic blended identity rooted in respect, empathy, and shared purpose.

Prevention and Early Intervention in Blended Families

Preventive approaches are integral to blended family counseling, as early intervention reduces the likelihood of entrenched conflict, emotional disengagement, and relationship dissolution. Preventive counseling emphasizes preparation, realistic expectation-setting, and resilience building before or soon after family blending occurs.

Premarital or pre-cohabitation counseling is one of the most effective preventive strategies. Counselors assist couples in exploring expectations about parenting, finances, discipline, and extended family involvement before formalizing their union. Research demonstrates that premarital counseling tailored to stepfamilies significantly improves communication and marital satisfaction (Schramm & Adler-Baeder, 2012). These sessions also provide a structured forum for discussing potential challenges—such as children’s reactions, co-parenting logistics, and boundary setting—before they escalate into conflict.

Parent education programs specifically designed for stepfamilies are another valuable resource. Programs like the Smart Steps for Stepfamilies initiative (Fine & Ganong, 2007) combine psychoeducation, communication training, and skills practice to support newly formed households. These workshops emphasize empathy, gradual relationship building, and shared family rituals. Counselors can deliver similar content through group counseling formats, enabling families to learn from each other’s experiences and normalize their struggles.

Schools and community centers also play a role in early intervention. Family life educators can collaborate with school counselors to identify children displaying signs of adjustment difficulties—such as withdrawal, aggression, or academic decline—and connect them with family support services. Integrating stepfamily awareness into school mental health programs helps reduce stigma and encourages families to seek help early.

Preventive work should additionally target coparenting education. Parents who divorce or remarry often underestimate the long-term coordination required between households. Counseling sessions that include both biological parents (when possible) facilitate consistent messaging to children, reducing triangulation and confusion. These cooperative efforts contribute to stability, which is a key predictor of child well-being across diverse family structures (Amato, 2010).

Cultural and Ethical Considerations

Counselors working with blended families must adopt a culturally competent and ethically grounded approach. The concept of “family” varies widely across cultures, influencing beliefs about hierarchy, kinship, and obligation. In collectivistic societies, blended families may experience intensified scrutiny from extended family members or community networks, while in more individualistic cultures, autonomy and self-expression may take precedence. Counselors should explore each family’s cultural scripts for parenting, discipline, and marital roles to avoid imposing Westernized models of family functioning (McGoldrick et al., 2008).

Immigrant and multicultural blended families may face additional stressors, including language barriers, acculturation differences, and identity conflicts among children. For example, a child raised with collectivistic values may struggle to adapt to a stepfamily dynamic emphasizing independence and personal choice. Counselors should employ culturally sensitive assessment tools and communication techniques, allowing family members to articulate how cultural expectations shape their experiences of loyalty, respect, and authority.

Ethical considerations in blended family counseling also include confidentiality, dual relationships, and power balance. When working with multiple subsystems—such as parents, stepparents, and children—the counselor must clarify limits of confidentiality at the outset. Transparent informed consent procedures ensure that all members understand what information may be shared in conjoint sessions. Maintaining neutrality is essential, particularly when loyalties within the family are divided.

Another ethical challenge involves navigating post-divorce family systems, where former spouses remain involved in co-parenting. Counselors must remain impartial, focusing on the child’s best interest rather than mediating unresolved marital grievances. When court mandates or custody agreements intersect with counseling, practitioners should adhere to legal standards while preserving therapeutic integrity (APA, 2017).

Cultural humility and ethical rigor enable counselors to adapt interventions appropriately. Recognizing that blended families are not “broken” but restructured systems fosters respect and empowerment. Counselors who model inclusivity and empathy promote environments where all voices—especially those of children—are heard and valued.

Research and Future Directions

Empirical research on blended family counseling has expanded significantly since the 1990s, reflecting increased societal diversity and complexity of family forms. However, the field continues to face methodological challenges due to variations in family composition and cultural context. Emerging research underscores several promising directions for practice and policy.

One growing area of inquiry concerns the longitudinal impact of counseling interventions. Studies show that blended families receiving structured therapy or educational interventions within the first two years of formation report higher marital satisfaction and family cohesion over time compared to those without counseling (Ganong et al., 2019). Further longitudinal studies are needed to track developmental outcomes for children and adolescents who experience stepfamily transitions.

Another trend involves the integration of technology-assisted counseling. Virtual family therapy and telehealth platforms have become increasingly accessible, especially for geographically dispersed families. Early evidence suggests that online counseling maintains therapeutic alliance quality comparable to in-person sessions (Békés & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2020). Virtual modalities also allow participation of nonresidential parents, promoting continuity across households.

Research is also exploring intersectional and multicultural perspectives, acknowledging that blended family experiences intersect with gender, class, race, and sexuality. Same-sex stepfamilies, for instance, often navigate additional layers of stigma and legal complexity, necessitating inclusive, affirming counseling models (Tasker & Patterson, 2020).

Future studies should adopt ecological and resilience-based frameworks, emphasizing strengths rather than deficits. Instead of framing stepfamilies as inherently problematic, research can highlight adaptive processes such as flexible role negotiation, cooperative problem-solving, and emotional literacy. Developing culturally validated outcome measures will further enhance global relevance and applicability.

Finally, interdisciplinary collaboration between counseling psychology, social work, education, and law is essential. Policy development—such as inclusive parental leave or counseling access for reconstituted families—can extend the benefits of therapeutic intervention into structural supports.

Conclusion

Blended family counseling represents a vital and evolving domain within counseling psychology, reflecting the realities of modern relational life. These families challenge traditional assumptions about structure, loyalty, and identity, requiring counselors to integrate systemic understanding with cultural and developmental sensitivity. Through evidence-based approaches—such as structural, narrative, and attachment-focused interventions—counselors help families navigate complexity, resolve conflict, and foster emotional connection.

Successful counseling transcends symptom relief; it facilitates the creation of a new family identity built on communication, empathy, and mutual respect. Preventive education, ethical mindfulness, and interdisciplinary collaboration will continue to shape the field’s future, ensuring that blended families receive the comprehensive support they need to thrive.

Ultimately, counseling is not about “fixing” differences but about helping family members find coherence amid diversity. By supporting blended families in integrating their histories into a unified narrative, counselors contribute to resilience, stability, and enduring relational well-being.

References

1. Afifi, T. D., & Schrodt, P. (2003). “Feeling caught” as a mediator of adolescents’ and young adults’ avoidance and satisfaction with their parents in divorced and nondivorced families. Communication Monographs, 70(2), 142–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000133791

2. Afifi, T. D., Davis, S., Merrill, A., & Denes, A. (2015). Family communication and resilience. Journal of Family Communication, 15(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2015.1043431

3. Ahrons, C. R. (2007). Family ties after divorce: Long-term implications for children. Family Process, 46(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00191.x

4. Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x

5. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code

6. Békés, V., & Aafjes-van Doorn, K. (2020). Psychotherapists’ attitudes toward online therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000214

7. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books.

8. Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson.

9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.

10. Fine, M. A., & Ganong, L. H. (2007). Stepfamily relationships: Development, dynamics, and interventions. Springer.

11. Fine, M. A., & Kurdek, L. A. (1995). Relation between marital quality and stepfamily adjustment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(2), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/353693

12. Ganong, L. H., & Coleman, M. (2017). Stepfamily relationships: Development, dynamics, and interventions (2nd ed.). Springer.

13. Ganong, L. H., Coleman, M., Jamison, T., & Feistman, R. (2019). Communication in stepfamilies: A review and future directions. Journal of Family Communication, 19(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2019.1603144

14. Gottman, J., & Silver, N. (2015). The seven principles for making marriage work (2nd ed.). Harmony Books.

15. Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection. Brunner-Routledge.

16. McGoldrick, M., Gerson, R., & Petry, S. (2008). Genograms: Assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). W. W. Norton.

17. Nichols, M. P., & Tafuri, S. A. (2013). Techniques of structural family assessment: A qualitative analysis of expert opinion. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39(4), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00325.x

18. Olson, D. H. (2011). FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00175.x

19. Papernow, P. L. (2013). Surviving and thriving in stepfamily relationships: What works and what doesn’t. Routledge.

20. Papernow, P. L. (2018). Clinical guidelines for working with stepfamilies: What family therapists need to know. Family Process, 57(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12272

21. Pew Research Center. (2015). Parenting in America: Outlook, worries, aspirations are strongly linked to financial situation. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2015/12/17/parenting-in-america

22. Schramm, D. G., & Adler-Baeder, F. (2012). Marital preparation of stepcouples: Examining the impact of PREP on remarital outcomes. Family Relations, 61(4), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00734.x

23. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547

24. Tasker, F., & Patterson, C. J. (2020). Family relationships and the well-being of children with lesbian and gay parents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(7), 792–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13207