Family Crisis Counseling

Family crisis counseling is a branch of counseling psychology focused on helping families cope with, adapt to, and recover from sudden and destabilizing events that disrupt their normal functioning. Crises may arise from acute life events such as death, illness, divorce, natural disaster, financial collapse, or violence, each creating a state of disequilibrium within the family system. The aim of family crisis counseling is to restore balance through rapid intervention, stabilization, emotional support, and systemic reorganization. This article reviews the theoretical foundations, stages, and evidence-based practices in family crisis counseling. It emphasizes the role of resilience, family systems theory, ecological perspectives, and trauma-informed practice. The article further explores assessment, intervention planning, and prevention strategies across different crisis typologies, highlighting cultural and ethical considerations that shape effective counseling responses.

Introduction

Families are complex adaptive systems that operate through patterns of communication, shared roles, and emotional interdependence. A family crisis occurs when this system is suddenly disrupted by an event or accumulation of stressors that exceed its coping capacity. When equilibrium is lost, the family may experience confusion, role disorganization, emotional distress, or interpersonal withdrawal. Family crisis counseling provides an immediate and structured psychological response aimed at stabilizing the family, restoring functioning, and fostering resilience in the aftermath of a crisis (Walsh, 2016).

The 21st century has brought intensified exposure to crises—natural disasters, pandemics, displacement, political violence, and sudden economic instability—affecting millions of families worldwide. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic underscored how collective crises can destabilize family routines, heighten anxiety, and increase risk of conflict and burnout (Prime et al., 2020). Similarly, interpersonal crises such as divorce, bereavement, or chronic illness alter family roles and relationships in profound ways. In each case, families require adaptive reorganization and emotional healing.

The practice of family crisis counseling integrates concepts from systemic therapy, crisis intervention theory, family resilience research, and trauma psychology. Counselors engage families through active listening, stabilization techniques, and collaborative problem-solving, while fostering new meaning and growth following adversity. The counselor’s presence acts as a stabilizing force—reducing chaos, providing structure, and restoring hope.

This article provides a detailed analysis of the conceptual foundations, assessment methods, and early-phase interventions in family crisis counseling. The goal is to offer a comprehensive overview suitable for practitioners, scholars, and students seeking to understand how families recover, adapt, and grow following disruption.

Theoretical Foundations of Family Crisis Counseling

Family crisis counseling draws from several intersecting theories that explain how families respond to and recover from disruption.

Family Systems Theory (Bowen, 1978; Minuchin, 1974) provides the central framework. It conceptualizes the family as an emotional unit in which the behavior of one member affects all others. Crises are systemic disturbances that create imbalance across subsystems (spousal, parental, sibling). The counselor helps the family restore balance through realignment of boundaries, roles, and communication patterns.

Crisis Intervention Theory (Caplan, 1964) describes crisis as a temporary state of psychological disequilibrium resulting from an inability to cope with a stressor using customary problem-solving methods. Caplan’s four-stage model—problem identification, emotional expression, exploring alternatives, and developing new coping skills—has been widely adapted to family counseling contexts.

Family Resilience Theory (Walsh, 1996) expands on crisis models by emphasizing strengths rather than pathology. It views crises as potential catalysts for growth and transformation when families access protective factors such as meaning-making, adaptability, connectedness, and community support. Research shows that resilient families demonstrate flexible structures, shared problem-solving, and optimism even under pressure (Walsh, 2016).

Ecological Systems Theory (Bronfenbrenner, 1979) broadens understanding of crises by situating families within multiple environmental layers—community, culture, institutions, and policies—that influence their experience of stress and recovery. Effective family crisis counseling therefore incorporates collaboration with schools, healthcare providers, and community organizations.

Finally, Trauma-Informed Counseling contributes principles of safety, trust, collaboration, and empowerment (SAMHSA, 2014). Many family crises, especially those involving violence or sudden loss, contain traumatic components. Trauma-informed family crisis counseling prioritizes stabilization before emotional processing and ensures that interventions do not retraumatize clients.

Together, these frameworks guide counselors in assessing family functioning, conceptualizing crisis dynamics, and selecting appropriate interventions for recovery and resilience.

Typologies of Family Crises

Scholars categorize family crises based on their origin, duration, and impact on the system. This typology helps counselors tailor interventions.

1. Situational Crises result from sudden, unexpected events such as accidents, natural disasters, or job loss. They create immediate emotional and logistical chaos requiring urgent stabilization (Golan, 1987).

2. Developmental Crises accompany normative life transitions—childbirth, adolescence, retirement, or children leaving home—that can become crises when supports are lacking or stressors accumulate (Carter & McGoldrick, 2005).

3. Chronic or Cumulative Crises stem from prolonged exposure to stress, such as chronic illness, caregiving burden, or ongoing financial strain. They often lead to burnout and emotional depletion.

4. Traumatic Crises involve experiences of violence, death, or abuse that threaten safety and identity. They demand trauma-informed care and long-term therapeutic support.

5. Cultural or Collective Crises arise from war, migration, or pandemics that affect entire communities. Such crises require integration of cultural resources, rituals, and social solidarity in counseling interventions.

Each crisis type alters the family’s internal organization differently. Situational and traumatic crises may cause temporary chaos, while chronic crises erode resilience gradually. Counselors assess both the nature of the event and the family’s existing coping repertoire to plan interventions that match intensity and duration.

The Impact of Crisis on Family Functioning

The effects of crisis reverberate across emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and relational domains. Emotional manifestations include fear, guilt, anger, numbness, or despair. Cognitive symptoms often involve confusion, intrusive memories, or catastrophic thinking. Behaviorally, families may oscillate between overactivity and paralysis, displaying irritability, avoidance, or conflict.

At the systemic level, crises disrupt established hierarchies and roles. Parents under stress may become emotionally unavailable, while children may assume caretaking responsibilities. Marital satisfaction often declines due to miscommunication and divergent coping styles. If left unaddressed, these disruptions can crystallize into long-term dysfunction or intergenerational trauma (Walsh & McGoldrick, 2015).

However, crises can also activate dormant strengths. Families who successfully navigate adversity typically display open communication, adaptability, and shared meaning-making. Counselors help them transform crises into opportunities for connection and growth—a process often described as “resilience in motion” (Walsh, 2016).

Assessment in Family Crisis Counseling

Assessment is the cornerstone of effective intervention. Because crises unfold rapidly, counselors must conduct concise yet comprehensive evaluations addressing emotional, relational, and contextual variables.

A widely used model is the ABC–X Model of Family Stress and Adaptation (Hill, 1958). In this model:

• A represents the stressor event;

• B denotes the family’s resources;

• C reflects the family’s perception of the event;

• X is the resulting level of crisis or adaptation.

This model helps counselors understand why families exposed to similar events may experience different outcomes. Assessment focuses on identifying stressor characteristics (e.g., suddenness, controllability), internal resources (coping skills, cohesion, communication), and external resources (social networks, finances).

Counselors also evaluate emotional regulation, role distribution, and developmental needs of each family member. Structured tools such as the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES IV) (Olson, 2011) or the Family Resilience Assessment Scale (FRAS) provide quantitative data to complement clinical judgment.

Observation of nonverbal cues, relational alliances, and conflict styles further informs formulation. Family genograms help map intergenerational coping patterns and unresolved losses that may resurface during crisis.

Initial Stabilization and Safety

The immediate goal of family crisis counseling is stabilization—restoring safety and reducing chaos. Families in acute crisis require containment of emotional distress before any in-depth processing. Counselors prioritize:

• Ensuring physical safety by assessing risk of harm, abuse, or self-injury and linking families to protective resources.

• Providing psychological first aid, which includes empathetic listening, normalization of reactions, and reassurance that distress is understandable and temporary (Brymer et al., 2006).

• Reducing physiological arousal through grounding and breathing techniques that calm the body’s stress response.

• Reestablishing routines to provide predictability for children and vulnerable members.

• Mobilizing external supports—extended family, community networks, or faith institutions—to expand coping capacity.

During this phase, counselors maintain a directive but compassionate stance. The objective is to create emotional and environmental stability that allows the family to process events and engage collaboratively in longer-term problem-solving.

Intervention Models in Family Crisis Counseling

Once immediate stabilization is achieved, counselors transition into the active intervention phase, where the goal shifts from crisis containment to adaptive restructuring and resilience building. This stage involves helping the family re-evaluate beliefs, redistribute roles, and develop new coping patterns to restore systemic balance. Family crisis counseling emphasizes flexibility, empowerment, and the mobilization of both internal and external resources.

The ABC-X and Double ABC-X Frameworks

Counselors often rely on Hill’s (1958) ABC-X model and McCubbin and Patterson’s (1983) Double ABC-X model to conceptualize family adaptation. In the Double ABC-X model, post-crisis processes are represented as:

• aA: the initial stressor and its cumulative aftermath;

• bB: existing and newly developed coping resources;

• cC: evolving perceptions of the event and family identity;

• xX: the level of adaptation, ranging from maladaptation to bonadaptation.

This framework underscores that adaptation is dynamic and recursive rather than linear. Counselors help families strengthen bB—coping resources—and reframe cC—their perceptions—by fostering shared meaning and hope.

The Six-Step Crisis Intervention Model

A practical guide for family crisis counselors derives from Gilliland and James’s (2013) six-step model, adapted for systemic application:

1. Define the problem – Clarify the nature and scope of the crisis from each family member’s viewpoint.

2. Ensure safety – Address threats to physical and psychological security.

3. Provide support – Offer empathy, validation, and emotional containment.

4. Examine alternatives – Brainstorm adaptive coping strategies.

5. Make a plan – Establish concrete action steps and shared responsibilities.

6. Obtain commitment – Secure ongoing participation in recovery and follow-up sessions.

These steps are cyclical and flexible, enabling counselors to respond to changing family needs as recovery unfolds.

The Family Resilience Framework

The Family Resilience Framework developed by Walsh (1996, 2016) integrates systemic, developmental, and strengths-based perspectives. It organizes intervention into three major domains:

1. Belief Systems – Facilitating meaning-making, maintaining hope, and normalizing hardship as part of life’s cycle.

2. Organizational Patterns – Promoting flexibility, connectedness, and resource mobilization.

3. Communication Processes – Encouraging open emotional expression and collaborative problem-solving.

Counselors using this framework help families construct coherent narratives that integrate the crisis into their shared history while emphasizing empowerment and relational competence.

Counseling Phases and Techniques

Phase 1: Assessment and Rapport Building

Although assessment begins in stabilization, it continues throughout counseling. Counselors build trust through authenticity and transparency, clarifying their supportive but non-intrusive role. Structured genograms and eco-maps help visualize multigenerational coping styles and community links. Rapport is enhanced through active empathy, consistent presence, and respect for family hierarchy and cultural norms.

Phase 2: Meaning-Making and Cognitive Reframing

Families in crisis often struggle with “why us” narratives characterized by guilt, anger, or helplessness. Cognitive reframing enables them to reinterpret the event as a challenge rather than punishment. Counselors may use Socratic questioning to help members explore alternative interpretations. For example, reframing “we failed to protect our child” into “we did everything possible and are learning new ways to support safety” shifts the emotional tone from despair to agency.

Narrative techniques complement this process. The counselor invites the family to retell the crisis story, highlighting resilience moments and identifying the values that sustained them. Reconstructing the story together fosters coherence and solidarity (White & Epston, 1990).

Phase 3: Communication and Emotional Regulation

Crisis heightens emotional reactivity. Counselors teach families regulation strategies such as deep-breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, or mindfulness exercises (Kabat-Zinn, 2013). These tools reduce physiological arousal and create emotional space for dialogue.

Emotionally focused techniques (Johnson, 2004) are particularly effective, as they help family members identify unmet attachment needs beneath anger or withdrawal. For instance, a partner’s irritability after job loss may mask fear of inadequacy. When such emotions are named and validated, defensive cycles give way to empathy.

Family communication training emphasizes listening without interruption, using “I” statements, and clarifying expectations. Role-playing difficult conversations allows practice in a safe environment.

Phase 4: Problem-Solving and Role Realignment

Once emotional regulation is re-established, the family can tackle practical issues. Counselors guide structured problem-solving—identifying priorities, brainstorming solutions, evaluating feasibility, and assigning tasks. Problem-solving is collaborative; it reframes family members from victims to active agents of recovery.

In many crises, roles must be redistributed. For example, after illness or death of a parent, adolescents may assume greater household responsibilities. Counselors ensure these adjustments remain developmentally appropriate and temporary. Clarity of expectations prevents role confusion and resentment.

Phase 5: Resource Mobilization and Social Support

Social connection is one of the strongest predictors of recovery. Counselors encourage families to activate natural supports—extended kin, neighbors, schools, or faith communities. Where gaps exist, referrals to community resources, financial assistance, or specialized therapy are arranged. Collaboration with social workers, educators, and healthcare professionals integrates psychosocial and practical supports.

In collectivist cultures, community rituals and group solidarity play a central healing role. Counselors may collaborate with cultural leaders to design interventions aligned with traditional coping mechanisms, such as communal storytelling or religious ceremonies.

Specialized Modalities within Family Crisis Counseling

Trauma-Informed Family Therapy

When crisis involves traumatic exposure—violence, abuse, or disaster—trauma-informed counseling principles apply. Safety, trustworthiness, empowerment, and collaboration guide every interaction (SAMHSA, 2014). Counselors prioritize stabilization before trauma processing, ensuring that re-exposure to distressing material does not overwhelm the system. Family members learn grounding techniques, mutual regulation, and the neurobiology of trauma to demystify symptoms like hypervigilance or emotional numbing.

Solution-Focused and Strength-Based Approaches

Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) is well suited to crisis contexts due to its brevity and optimism. Counselors ask future-oriented questions—“What will tell you things are improving?”—to identify immediate, achievable goals (Kim, 2008). Strength-based approaches amplify coping resources already present in the family, reinforcing efficacy and hope.

Multicultural and Cross-Cultural Interventions

In multicultural settings, family crisis counseling must address variations in emotion expression, decision-making, and help-seeking behaviors. Immigrant and refugee families, for example, may experience cumulative trauma from displacement, loss of homeland, and language barriers. Culturally responsive counselors adopt flexible communication styles, respect traditional hierarchies, and integrate indigenous healing practices when appropriate (Henderson et al., 2018).

Use of Technology and Tele-Counseling

Technological advances have expanded access to crisis counseling. Virtual family sessions, online support groups, and digital resource hubs allow geographically dispersed members to participate in therapy. Evidence suggests that tele-counseling maintains comparable effectiveness to in-person interventions when confidentiality and rapport are safeguarded (Békés & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2020). Digital platforms also facilitate continuous monitoring and follow-up, which are essential for post-crisis maintenance.

Promoting Systemic Recovery and Resilience

The long-term goal of family crisis counseling is systemic adaptation—a process through which the family develops new equilibrium and meaning after crisis. Counselors help families transition from “survival mode” to reconstruction by emphasizing three developmental tasks: integration of loss, mastery of new roles, and re-establishment of hope.

Integration involves acknowledging both the rupture and the continuity of family identity. Families may engage in memorial rituals, storytelling, or creative projects to symbolically mark the transition. Mastery entails acquiring new coping competencies, such as budgeting after financial loss or caregiving after injury. Hope emerges through recognition of progress, however gradual, and through envisioning a viable future.

Resilience-building is sustained by continuous reflection on lessons learned. Families are encouraged to maintain periodic check-ins, celebrate small victories, and nurture relational gratitude. Counselors conclude by developing a family resilience plan—a written document outlining warning signs of stress relapse, coping resources, and support contacts. This plan anchors stability while promoting autonomy.

Preventive and Preparedness Strategies in Family Crisis Counseling

Prevention and preparedness are essential dimensions of family crisis counseling, representing a proactive rather than reactive stance. While much of crisis intervention focuses on immediate response, preventive counseling strengthens families before a crisis occurs, reducing vulnerability and enhancing coping capacity. Counselors design interventions that foster communication, emotional literacy, and problem-solving competence as protective mechanisms against potential destabilization.

Preventive work begins with psychoeducation. Families learn about typical crisis reactions, stress physiology, and adaptive coping mechanisms. Understanding that crises are temporary states of disequilibrium—rather than signs of dysfunction—helps normalize distress and reduce fear. Psychoeducational workshops, often implemented in community or school settings, teach families to recognize early warning signs of overload, such as emotional withdrawal, irritability, or cognitive confusion.

Family resilience training is another preventive strategy. These programs draw on the Family Resilience Framework (Walsh, 2016), focusing on strengthening belief systems, flexibility, and communication. Families practice maintaining perspective during adversity, reframing challenges as opportunities for growth, and identifying sources of meaning. Structured activities—such as collaborative storytelling, gratitude journaling, or family meetings—foster emotional cohesion and adaptability.

Preparedness also involves crisis planning. Counselors assist families in creating emergency plans that include safety protocols, contact lists, and resource inventories. For example, families living in disaster-prone areas can establish evacuation plans and communication routines. Those with members facing chronic illness or mental health vulnerability can plan care contingencies and crisis-response sequences. Such preparation not only provides logistical readiness but also psychological reassurance.

Additionally, preventive counseling encourages intergenerational dialogue. Many crises reveal unresolved historical stressors or communication taboos. Structured conversations between generations allow older members to share coping wisdom, while younger members express contemporary concerns. This exchange strengthens intergenerational bonds and promotes continuity of resilience.

Community-based partnerships extend preventive efforts beyond the counseling office. Counselors collaborate with schools, faith organizations, and public health agencies to deliver family-strengthening initiatives. These collaborations embed prevention into daily life, creating systems-level resilience that benefits broader populations.

Cultural and Ethical Dimensions of Family Crisis Counseling

Culture profoundly shapes the experience of crisis, perceptions of causality, and preferred methods of resolution. Family crisis counseling must therefore be both culturally competent and ethically grounded. Counselors must approach each family as embedded in a unique cultural context, with its own values, belief systems, and communication norms.

In collectivist societies, crises are often interpreted as communal rather than individual events. Extended kinship networks and community rituals play a central role in coping and meaning-making (Ting-Toomey & Oetzel, 2013). Counselors in such contexts may incorporate family elders, community leaders, or faith figures into sessions, balancing professional intervention with traditional forms of healing. For instance, rituals of mourning, storytelling, or prayer may coexist with cognitive and systemic techniques, enriching the therapeutic process.

Conversely, in individualistic cultures, autonomy and self-expression are highly valued. Families may expect direct communication, confidentiality, and private coping. Counselors in these contexts prioritize personal empowerment, emotional articulation, and negotiated decision-making. Yet even within individualistic settings, subcultural differences—such as religion, socioeconomic class, or migration history—necessitate flexible, intersectional awareness.

Ethical practice in family crisis counseling is guided by the principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice (APA, 2017). Confidentiality is complex when multiple family members are involved. Counselors must clarify from the outset what information remains private and what may be shared collectively to support recovery. Informed consent procedures should outline these boundaries transparently.

In crises involving abuse, domestic violence, or imminent harm, ethical responsibility supersedes confidentiality. Counselors must ensure safety, report as legally required, and coordinate with protective services. In cases of cultural conflict—such as when traditional norms condone practices harmful to certain members—counselors balance cultural sensitivity with advocacy for human rights and psychological safety.

Competent crisis counselors also practice self-awareness and self-care. Exposure to trauma narratives can evoke vicarious stress. Regular supervision, peer consultation, and mindfulness help maintain professional stability and ethical clarity.

Counselor Competencies and Professional Roles

Counselors engaging in family crisis counseling require a blend of clinical expertise, systemic insight, and emotional regulation. Key competencies include:

1. Systemic Assessment Skills – Ability to analyze family interactional patterns and identify leverage points for change.

2. Crisis Stabilization Techniques – Mastery of de-escalation, grounding, and safety planning under high-stress conditions.

3. Cultural Humility – Recognition of one’s cultural lens, openness to learning, and respect for diverse worldviews.

4. Communication Facilitation – Proficiency in reflective listening, conflict mediation, and emotion coaching.

5. Interdisciplinary Collaboration – Coordination with social workers, educators, physicians, and emergency responders to address holistic needs.

6. Resilience Promotion – Capacity to identify strengths, reinforce coping resources, and foster long-term adaptability.

7. Ethical Decision-Making – Adherence to professional codes while balancing confidentiality, safety, and cultural obligations.

In addition to therapeutic roles, counselors often function as advocates and educators. They may design crisis-preparedness workshops, contribute to disaster-response planning, or consult for agencies serving vulnerable populations. Their systemic knowledge positions them to influence policy related to family welfare and community resilience.

Research and Emerging Directions

Recent research in family crisis counseling has expanded into interdisciplinary and technological domains. Neuropsychological studies reveal that chronic family crisis exposure alters stress-response systems, particularly the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, emphasizing the need for early intervention to prevent long-term health consequences (Repetti et al., 2011).

Digital platforms have emerged as powerful adjuncts in crisis intervention. Telehealth counseling, online psychoeducation, and mobile apps designed for stress regulation extend the reach of family crisis services (Békés & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2020). These tools allow real-time communication, remote monitoring, and ongoing support. However, ethical considerations—such as data privacy and informed consent—require careful management.

Cross-cultural research has also grown. Comparative studies show that collectivist families tend to recover more rapidly from crisis when supported by community networks, while individualistic families benefit from self-reflection and autonomy-enhancing interventions (Walsh & McGoldrick, 2015). Future research aims to integrate these insights into culturally hybrid models of resilience.

Emerging frameworks emphasize posttraumatic growth (PTG)—positive psychological change following adversity. Families who process crises constructively often report enhanced appreciation of life, improved relationships, and spiritual deepening (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004). Counselors facilitate PTG by guiding families to identify strengths discovered through hardship and incorporating them into their ongoing narrative.

Longitudinal studies further indicate that family resilience develops cumulatively. Small adaptive successes in earlier stress events build competence for larger challenges (Walsh, 2016). This cumulative resilience underscores the value of continuous, preventive engagement rather than short-term intervention alone.

Conclusion

Family crisis counseling embodies the intersection of human empathy, scientific understanding, and systemic intervention. Families inevitably face disruptions—some sudden, others chronic—that challenge their equilibrium and identity. Counseling transforms these moments from chaos into opportunities for renewal by promoting connection, meaning, and adaptability.

Grounded in theories of systems, resilience, and trauma recovery, family crisis counseling offers structured pathways through which families stabilize, reorganize, and rediscover coherence. Its success depends on the counselor’s capacity to hold the dual vision of vulnerability and strength—to validate suffering while evoking hope.

In an increasingly unpredictable world, the principles of family crisis counseling extend beyond therapy rooms. They inform community education, public policy, and organizational design aimed at sustaining human resilience. By equipping families to communicate openly, seek support, and act collectively, counselors contribute to a culture of preparedness and solidarity that transcends individual crises.

References

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
Békés, V., & Aafjes-van Doorn, K. (2020). Psychotherapists’ attitudes toward online therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000214
Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Brymer, M., Jacobs, A., Layne, C., Pynoos, R., Ruzek, J., Steinberg, A., … & Watson, P. (2006). Psychological first aid: Field operations guide (2nd ed.). National Child Traumatic Stress Network and National Center for PTSD. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/type/psych_firstaid_manual.asp
Caplan, G. (1964). Principles of preventive psychiatry. Basic Books.
Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (2005). The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Golan, N. (1987). Passing through transitions: A guide for practitioners. Free Press.
Gilliland, B. E., & James, R. K. (2013). Crisis intervention strategies (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Henderson, T. L., Roberto, K. A., & Kamo, Y. (2018). Older adults, family crises, and cross-cultural caregiving. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 33(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-018-9346-7
Hill, R. (1958). Generic features of families under stress. Social Casework, 39(2–3), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/104438945803900204
Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection. Brunner-Routledge.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Bantam.
Kim, J. S. (2008). Examining the effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy: A meta-analysis. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507307807
McCubbin, H. I., & Patterson, J. M. (1983). The family stress process: The double ABCX model of adjustment and adaptation. In H. McCubbin et al. (Eds.), Social stress and the family (pp. 7–37). University of Minnesota Press.
Prime, H., Wade, M., & Browne, D. T. (2020). Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 75(5), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000660
Repetti, R. L., Robles, T. F., & Reynolds, B. (2011). Allostatic processes in the family. Development and Psychopathology, 23(3), 921–938. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457941100040X
SAMHSA. (2014). Trauma-informed care in behavioral health services (Treatment Improvement Protocol Series 57). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207201/
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
Ting-Toomey, S., & Oetzel, J. G. (2013). The SAGE handbook of conflict communication: Integrating theory, research, and practice. Sage.
Walsh, F. (1996). The concept of family resilience: Crisis and challenge. Family Process, 35(3), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1996.00261.x
Walsh, F. (2016). Strengthening family resilience (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Walsh, F., & McGoldrick, M. (2015). Living beyond loss: Death in the family (3rd ed.). W. W. Norton.
White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. W. W. Norton.