Family grief counseling represents a specialized therapeutic approach that addresses the complex emotional, relational, and systemic challenges families encounter following significant loss. Unlike individual grief therapy, this modality recognizes that bereavement affects entire family systems, altering communication patterns, roles, hierarchies, and emotional dynamics. Family grief counselors facilitate adaptive mourning processes while strengthening family cohesion, helping members navigate their individual grief trajectories within the shared family context. This article examines the theoretical foundations, assessment strategies, intervention techniques, cultural considerations, and evidence-based practices that inform contemporary family grief counseling. By integrating systemic family therapy principles with grief and bereavement theory, practitioners can provide comprehensive support that honors both individual mourning needs and collective family healing.
The Nature of Family Grief
Grief extends beyond individual experience to permeate entire family systems, creating ripple effects that transform relationships, communication patterns, and family functioning. When loss occurs within or to a family, each member experiences their own unique grief response while simultaneously navigating the collective family bereavement (Shapiro, 2008). This dual process distinguishes family grief from individual mourning, as family members must balance personal emotional needs with their roles and responsibilities within the family unit.
The death of a family member fundamentally disrupts established family homeostasis. Roles previously fulfilled by the deceased must be redistributed, often creating strain as family members assume unfamiliar responsibilities. Communication patterns that once felt natural may become strained or avoidant, particularly when family members grieve at different paces or in different styles. Research indicates that families often develop implicit rules about grief expression, with some families encouraging open emotional sharing while others maintain stoic silence (Nadeau, 2008). These unspoken norms significantly influence how individual members process their loss and whether they feel supported or isolated in their grief.
Family grief also involves anticipatory mourning when terminal illness or progressive decline precedes death. During this period, families begin the grief process before the actual loss occurs, experiencing what Rando (1986) termed “anticipatory grief.” This phenomenon presents unique challenges and opportunities for family grief counseling, as interventions during this phase can strengthen family bonds, facilitate meaningful communication, and prepare family members for the transition ahead.
Theoretical Foundations of Family Grief Counseling
Family grief counseling draws upon multiple theoretical frameworks that inform assessment and intervention strategies. Systems theory provides the foundational perspective, conceptualizing families as interconnected units where change in one member affects all others (Bowen, 1976). When death occurs, the family system experiences disequilibrium, requiring adaptation and reorganization. Family grief counselors assess how the system responds to loss, identifying patterns of enmeshment or disengagement, triangulation, and boundary disturbances that may complicate mourning.
Attachment theory offers crucial insights into how family members experience and express grief based on their attachment histories and current attachment relationships (Bowlby, 1980). Secure attachments within the family generally facilitate healthier grief responses, while insecure attachment patterns may lead to complicated grief reactions. Children’s grief responses particularly reflect their attachment security with surviving caregivers, highlighting the importance of maintaining stable, responsive caregiving during bereavement.
The Dual Process Model of coping with bereavement, developed by Stroebe and Schut (1999), describes how bereaved individuals oscillate between loss-oriented coping (confronting the reality of death) and restoration-oriented coping (adapting to life changes). Within families, members may engage in these processes at different times and rates, creating potential for conflict when one member seeks to confront loss while another focuses on moving forward. Family grief counselors help families understand and respect these different coping rhythms.
Contemporary family grief counseling also incorporates meaning-making theories, recognizing that families collectively construct narratives about their loss that influence their grief trajectory (Neimeyer, 2001). These shared family meanings can facilitate healing when they honor the deceased while supporting continued family functioning, or they can complicate grief when narratives remain fragmented or contested among family members.
Assessment in Family Grief Counseling
Comprehensive assessment forms the cornerstone of effective family grief counseling, requiring evaluation of multiple dimensions including individual grief responses, family system functioning, developmental considerations, and contextual factors. Initial assessment begins with understanding the circumstances surrounding the loss—whether death was sudden or anticipated, traumatic or peaceful, timely or untimely—as these factors significantly influence family grief responses (Worden, 2018).
Evaluating individual family members’ grief reactions provides insight into the range of responses within the family system. Counselors assess for symptoms of normal grief, including sadness, yearning, anger, guilt, and anxiety, while remaining vigilant for indicators of complicated grief such as persistent inability to accept the death, intense emotional pain, identity disruption, or functional impairment extending beyond expected timeframes (Prigerson et al., 2009). Children’s grief assessment requires particular attention to developmental stage, as younger children may express grief through behavioral changes or play rather than verbal communication.
Family system assessment examines communication patterns, role distributions, boundary maintenance, and problem-solving capabilities. Counselors observe how family members interact during sessions, noting who speaks for whom, whether emotional expression is permitted or constrained, and how conflicts are managed. The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES IV) can provide standardized measurement of family functioning across dimensions of cohesion and flexibility (Olson, 2011). Additionally, assessing pre-loss family functioning helps counselors understand whether current difficulties represent grief-specific challenges or exacerbations of longstanding family issues.
Table 1: Common Family Grief Reactions Across Developmental Stages
| Developmental Stage | Typical Grief Reactions | Family Support Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Early Childhood (2-5 years) | Limited understanding of permanence; magical thinking about causation; regression in behaviors; separation anxiety; repetitive questioning | Use concrete, honest language; maintain routines; provide physical comfort; read age-appropriate books about death; tolerate repeated questions patiently |
| Middle Childhood (6-11 years) | Concrete understanding of death; worry about other family members dying; academic difficulties; somatic complaints; social withdrawal or aggression | Encourage expression through art or play; reassure about safety; maintain school communication; model healthy grief; facilitate peer support |
| Adolescence (12-18 years) | Cognitive understanding with emotional intensity; identity struggles; risk-taking behaviors; peer orientation; existential questioning | Respect need for independence while maintaining connection; monitor for substance use or suicidality; encourage peer support; discuss meaning and beliefs |
| Young Adulthood (19-30 years) | Career/relationship disruption; role confusion; conflict between independence and family connection; delayed grief due to caretaking responsibilities | Support life transition navigation; address role changes; facilitate family communication; normalize complex emotions; discuss future planning |
| Middle Adulthood (31-60 years) | Multiple role demands; sandwich generation stress; mortality awareness; relationship strain; financial concerns | Help with role distribution; address couple relationship; support meaning-making; assist with practical planning; encourage self-care |
| Older Adulthood (61+ years) | Accumulated losses; health challenges; isolation; concern for dependents; legacy reflection | Validate grief experience; address isolation; conduct life review; support continued meaningful activity; assess practical needs |
Cultural and spiritual assessment proves essential, as cultural backgrounds profoundly shape grief beliefs, practices, and expressions. Counselors must explore family cultural identities, religious or spiritual beliefs about death and afterlife, culturally specific mourning rituals, and expectations about grief duration and expression. Imposing dominant culture grief norms onto culturally diverse families constitutes a significant therapeutic error that can alienate families from needed support.
Risk assessment remains an ongoing process throughout family grief counseling. Counselors evaluate suicide risk, particularly among surviving spouses and adolescents, substance abuse potential, domestic violence risk, and child neglect concerns. Research indicates elevated rates of these complications during family bereavement, necessitating careful monitoring and appropriate intervention (Stroebe, Schut, & Stroebe, 2007).
Core Interventions in Family Grief Counseling
Family grief counseling employs diverse intervention strategies tailored to specific family needs, grief circumstances, and therapeutic phases. Creating a safe therapeutic environment where all family members feel heard and validated represents the foundational intervention. Counselors establish ground rules promoting respectful communication, ensuring that quieter family members have opportunities to share their experiences without domination by more vocal members.
Facilitating grief expression within the family context helps members share their emotional experiences while building empathy for each other’s unique grief responses. Counselors may use structured activities such as memory-sharing exercises, where each family member contributes stories or remembrances about the deceased. Creating family memory books, photo albums, or memorial projects provides concrete activities that honor the deceased while strengthening family bonds. These activities prove particularly valuable for children, who benefit from tangible engagement with grief processes.
Psychoeducation about normal grief responses reduces family members’ concerns about their own or others’ reactions. When parents understand that children may show intermittent grief, appearing sad one moment and playful the next, they worry less about their children’s adjustment. Similarly, when family members learn that grief has no prescribed timeline and that different people grieve differently, they develop greater tolerance for varying responses within the family.
Communication skills training addresses common family challenges during bereavement. Counselors teach active listening skills, help family members express needs directly rather than through criticism or withdrawal, and facilitate difficult conversations about topics families may avoid. Some families struggle to discuss the deceased, fearing that conversations will cause pain, while others cannot stop talking about their loss. Counselors help families find balance, creating space for both grief expression and engagement with ongoing life.
Restructuring family roles and responsibilities addresses practical adaptations required following loss. When a parent dies, surviving parents often struggle with overwhelming responsibilities while children may assume caregiving roles inappropriate for their developmental stage. Counselors help families redistribute tasks realistically, ensuring that children maintain developmentally appropriate responsibilities while adults secure necessary support. This intervention proves particularly crucial in single-parent families where death creates sole-parent households.
Addressing family conflict represents another essential intervention domain. Grief frequently intensifies pre-existing family tensions or creates new conflicts around funeral decisions, estate matters, parenting approaches, or differing grief expressions. Counselors provide mediation, helping families navigate disagreements while maintaining relationships. When conflicts prove intractable, counselors may recommend individual sessions with specific family members or referral to specialized services such as estate mediation.
Meaning-making interventions help families construct coherent narratives about their loss that support continued functioning. Counselors facilitate discussions about the deceased person’s legacy, values they embodied, and how the family will carry forward their memory. For families facing ambiguous loss circumstances, such as deaths by suicide or homicide, meaning-making becomes particularly complex yet crucial for family healing.
Specialized Contexts in Family Grief Counseling
Childhood and Adolescent Grief Within Families
Children’s grief occurs within the family context, with surviving parents or caregivers serving as primary support sources. Family grief counseling with children requires developmentally informed approaches that recognize cognitive and emotional capacities across childhood stages. Preschool children possess limited understanding of death’s permanence, often asking repeatedly when the deceased will return. School-age children grasp death’s finality but may engage in magical thinking about causation, sometimes blaming themselves for the death. Adolescents understand death cognitively but face unique challenges as they navigate grief while establishing independence from family (Webb, 2010).
Counselors help parents provide age-appropriate death education, encourage honest communication using concrete language rather than euphemisms, and maintain stable routines that provide security amid loss. Parents often struggle with their own grief while trying to support their children, sometimes hiding their emotions to protect children or, conversely, becoming so overwhelmed that children feel burdened. Family grief counseling helps parents find balance, modeling healthy grief expression while maintaining parental roles.
Parental Death and Surviving Parent Support
Parental death represents one of the most significant childhood adversities, associated with increased risk for mental health difficulties, academic problems, and complicated grief (Dowdney, 2000). Family grief counseling following parental death focuses on supporting the surviving parent while ensuring children’s needs receive adequate attention. Surviving parents face the dual challenge of managing their own spousal grief while providing parental support, often experiencing role overload and emotional exhaustion.
Interventions with these families emphasize maintaining family stability, preserving connection with the deceased parent through memories and rituals, and building support networks. Extended family involvement often proves valuable, though counselors must navigate situations where grandparents or other relatives disagree with the surviving parent’s approach. When surviving parents begin dating, family grief counseling can address children’s reactions and facilitate family discussions about relationship changes.
Child Death and Parental Bereavement
The death of a child profoundly affects entire family systems, challenging fundamental assumptions about life’s natural order. Parents experiencing child loss face exceptionally high risk for complicated grief, relationship strain, and psychological distress (Rando, 1986). Marital relationships often suffer as partners grieve differently, with research indicating that while divorce rates may not exceed general population rates, marital satisfaction frequently declines following child death (Bergstraesser, Inglin, Hornung, & Landolt, 2015).
Family grief counseling helps parents understand and accept different grieving styles, particularly gender-based differences in grief expression and coping. Mothers and fathers often grieve differently, with societal expectations influencing grief expression. Counselors facilitate couple communication, helping partners support each other despite different grief approaches. Addressing blame dynamics proves crucial, as parents may blame themselves or each other, particularly when death resulted from accident, illness, or sudden infant death syndrome.
Surviving siblings require special attention following a child’s death, as parents’ overwhelming grief may leave siblings feeling overlooked or burdened with supporting grieving parents. Family grief counseling ensures that siblings’ grief receives recognition and that parents maintain responsiveness to surviving children’s needs. Some siblings experience survivor guilt, wondering why they lived while their brother or sister died, requiring sensitive therapeutic exploration.
Traumatic Death and Complicated Grief
Deaths occurring through suicide, homicide, accident, or disaster present particular challenges for family grief counseling. Traumatic death combines grief with trauma symptoms, including intrusive thoughts, hyperarousal, avoidance, and negative cognitions (Rynearson & Correa, 2008). Family members may witness the death or discover the body, experiencing traumatic imagery that intrudes upon mourning processes. Media coverage of deaths through violence or disaster adds additional stress as families navigate public attention while dealing with private pain.
Family grief counseling following traumatic death integrates trauma-informed approaches with grief therapy. Counselors assess for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms requiring specialized treatment, provide psychoeducation about trauma responses, and teach grounding and regulation skills. Addressing traumatic imagery through techniques such as imaginal rescripting may help family members process disturbing memories. Families often struggle with “why” questions following traumatic death, seeking explanations that may never fully satisfy. Counselors help families tolerate ambiguity while constructing meanings that support continued living.
Suicide loss creates unique family challenges, including stigma, guilt, and complicated family dynamics around responsibility and warning signs missed (Jordan & McIntosh, 2011). Family members may blame each other for not preventing the death or struggle with anger toward the deceased for choosing death. Children may fear genetic vulnerability to suicide or worry about surviving parents’ suicidal potential. Family grief counseling addresses these concerns directly while connecting families with suicide loss support groups that reduce isolation.
Cultural Competence in Family Grief Counseling
Cultural backgrounds fundamentally shape how families understand death, express grief, conduct mourning rituals, and seek support. Family grief counselors must develop cultural humility, recognizing the limitations of their own cultural perspectives while genuinely seeking to understand families’ cultural worldviews (Rosenblatt, 2008). Rather than relying on cultural stereotypes, counselors adopt curious, respectful stances, inviting families to educate them about culturally specific beliefs and practices.
Different cultures maintain varying beliefs about death, afterlife, and the deceased’s relationship with living family members. Many Indigenous cultures emphasize ongoing spiritual connections with ancestors, while some Buddhist traditions view death as transition to rebirth. African American families often draw upon strong religious faith and church community support during bereavement. Latino families may observe extended mourning periods and specific rituals such as Day of the Dead celebrations. Asian American families from collectivist cultural backgrounds may prioritize family harmony over individual grief expression, influencing help-seeking patterns and therapeutic engagement (Doka & Tucci, 2009).
Mourning rituals vary dramatically across cultures, including differences in funeral practices, viewing the body, expressions of grief, clothing, and duration of formal mourning periods. Some cultures expect vocal, demonstrative grief expression while others value controlled, private mourning. Family grief counselors respect these differences, never imposing dominant culture norms or pathologizing culturally normative practices. Counselors may assist families in maintaining cultural rituals that provide meaning and community support during bereavement.
Immigration and acculturation add complexity to family grief when families maintain transnational connections. Immigrant families may grieve inability to attend funerals in countries of origin, face financial barriers to traveling for death rituals, or struggle with guilt about physical distance from dying or deceased family members. Acculturative gaps between immigrant parents and U.S.-born children can create family tensions around grief expression and ritual observance, with children sometimes rejecting traditional practices while parents view these practices as essential. Family grief counseling helps bridge these gaps, honoring both cultural preservation and adaptive acculturation.
Evidence-Based Practices and Outcome Research
Research examining family grief counseling effectiveness demonstrates generally positive outcomes, though methodological challenges complicate definitive conclusions. Family-Focused Grief Therapy (FFGT), developed by Kissane and colleagues, represents the most extensively researched family grief intervention. This manualized treatment targets families at risk for poor bereavement outcomes based on family functioning assessment. Studies indicate that FFGT improves family functioning, reduces individual distress, and prevents complicated grief, particularly among families with poor cohesion or high conflict (Kissane et al., 2006).
The Family Bereavement Program, designed for parentally bereaved children and their surviving caregivers, demonstrates effectiveness in reducing children’s mental health problems and improving parenting quality. This 12-session group intervention combines separate children’s and caregiver groups with family sessions, providing psychoeducation, skills training, and grief processing opportunities. Longitudinal follow-up studies reveal sustained benefits including reduced depression, anxiety, and substance use problems (Sandler et al., 2010).
Despite these promising findings, significant research gaps remain. Many family grief counseling approaches lack rigorous empirical evaluation, relying instead on clinical observation and theoretical rationale. Comparative effectiveness research examining different therapeutic modalities remains limited. Studies often focus on specific loss types—primarily parental or child death—limiting generalizability to other family loss circumstances. Cultural diversity among research samples remains insufficient, constraining understanding of intervention effectiveness across different cultural groups.
Future research directions should examine mechanisms of change in family grief counseling, identifying specific therapeutic processes associated with positive outcomes. Technology-based interventions, including telehealth family grief counseling and online support resources, require evaluation for effectiveness and accessibility. Long-term outcome studies extending beyond one- or two-year follow-up periods would illuminate whether early interventions produce lasting family benefits or whether families require ongoing support across the extended grief trajectory.
Practical Considerations and Professional Issues
Treatment Format and Duration
Family grief counseling occurs in various formats including weekly outpatient sessions, intensive day programs, family grief camps, and time-limited group interventions. Treatment duration varies considerably based on loss circumstances, family complexity, and treatment goals. Some families benefit from brief interventions of 6-10 sessions focused on acute grief support and psychoeducation, while others require extended therapy addressing complicated grief or co-occurring family issues. Counselors maintain flexibility, recognizing that families may discontinue treatment, return for additional support during grief surges around anniversaries or holidays, or require referral to specialized services for individual family members.
Group formats provide unique benefits, reducing isolation through connections with other bereaved families while offering cost-effective service delivery. Family grief groups may bring together families experiencing similar losses—such as suicide loss, child death, or military casualty—or may include families dealing with diverse losses. Group approaches work best when combined with some individual family sessions addressing family-specific concerns unsuitable for group discussion.
Professional Qualifications and Training
Family grief counseling requires integration of family therapy competencies with specialized knowledge of grief, bereavement, and loss. Mental health professionals practicing in this area typically hold master’s or doctoral degrees in counseling, psychology, social work, or marriage and family therapy, along with clinical licensure appropriate to their discipline and state. Advanced training in both family therapy and grief counseling proves essential, as training in only one area leaves practitioners underprepared for the specialized demands of family grief work.
Several professional organizations provide training resources and credentialing in grief counseling, including the Association for Death Education and Counseling (ADEC), which offers certification as a Thanatologist (CT) or Fellow in Thanatology (FT). The American Association of Marriage and Family Therapy (AAMFT) provides family therapy training standards applicable to grief counseling contexts. Ongoing professional development through workshops, conferences, and supervision maintains clinical competence as research and best practices evolve.
Self-Care and Counselor Wellbeing
Family grief counseling presents significant emotional demands, exposing counselors repeatedly to profound loss, family suffering, and sometimes traumatic death circumstances. Without adequate self-care, counselors risk compassion fatigue, vicarious traumatization, and burnout (Figley, 2002). Effective self-care strategies include maintaining appropriate caseload balance between grief cases and other clinical work, participating in regular clinical supervision, engaging in personal therapy when needed, and pursuing restorative activities outside professional roles.
Counselors must also monitor their own grief experiences, recognizing when personal losses interfere with clinical objectivity or when specific cases resonate too closely with counselors’ own grief. Taking breaks from grief-focused work or declining cases too similar to personal loss experiences represents responsible professional practice rather than weakness.
Integration With Other Services
Family grief counseling often occurs within broader service systems requiring coordination and collaboration. Medical settings such as hospitals and hospices represent common contexts for family grief counseling, with palliative care teams increasingly including bereavement specialists. School-based grief counseling supports children following losses while collaborating with school personnel to maintain academic functioning and peer relationships. Funeral homes frequently provide grief resources and referrals, serving as community touchpoints for bereaved families.
Legal and financial professionals often intersect with bereaved families managing estate issues, custody matters, or wrongful death litigation. Family grief counselors may collaborate with attorneys, financial planners, or victim advocates to ensure comprehensive support. Religious and spiritual leaders provide essential support for many bereaved families, warranting counselor collaboration when families desire integrated care. Community-based organizations including hospice bereavement programs, grief support groups, and online communities extend the support network beyond individual counseling.
Emerging Trends and Future Directions
Contemporary family grief counseling continues evolving in response to societal changes, technological advances, and emerging research. Social media and digital technology transform how families grieve, creating online memorials, sharing grief experiences through social networking, and accessing virtual support communities. Counselors increasingly address technology’s role in family grief, helping families navigate decisions about deceased family members’ digital legacies and supporting appropriate use of online resources while guarding against problematic internet use as grief avoidance.
Telehealth delivery of family grief counseling expanded dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrating feasibility and accessibility benefits while raising questions about therapeutic effectiveness compared with in-person services. Research examining telehealth family grief counseling remains nascent but suggests comparable outcomes to traditional delivery for many families, with particular advantages for rural families, families with transportation barriers, or families managing work schedules incompatible with office-based services (Kokou-Kpolou et al., 2020).
Complicated grief treatment protocols, initially developed for individual therapy, are being adapted for family contexts. Prolonged Grief Disorder’s inclusion in the DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 provides diagnostic clarity for complicated grief, potentially improving access to evidence-based treatment and insurance reimbursement. Family-based adaptations of complicated grief treatment could address situations where multiple family members experience prolonged grief disorder or where family dynamics perpetuate grief complications.
Growing recognition of disenfranchised grief—losses not socially recognized or validated—extends family grief counseling to non-traditional family configurations. Grief following pregnancy loss, infertility, pet death, estrangement, or incarceration increasingly receives clinical attention. LGBTQ+ families facing discrimination or lack of legal recognition for family relationships may experience disenfranchisement of their grief, requiring counselors to provide affirming support while advocating for broader social change.
Table 2: Cultural Considerations in Family Grief Counseling
| Cultural Dimension | Variations Across Cultures | Counselor Responses |
|---|---|---|
| Death Beliefs | Finality vs. continued relationship; reincarnation; afterlife concepts; ancestor veneration; spiritual vs. secular frameworks | Explore family beliefs without imposing counselor values; respect spiritual practices; integrate beliefs into meaning-making |
| Grief Expression | Restrained vs. demonstrative; private vs. public; individual vs. collective; gender-based expectations | Normalize diverse expressions; avoid pathologizing cultural norms; validate family’s expression style |
| Mourning Duration | Brief formal mourning vs. extended periods; specific ritual timeframes; perpetual mourning traditions | Respect cultural timeframes; avoid rushing grief process; support ritual observance |
| Family Roles | Individualist vs. collectivist values; hierarchical authority structures; gender-based responsibilities; extended family involvement | Understand family structure; respect authority patterns; include extended family appropriately |
| Help-Seeking | Preference for formal counseling vs. religious leaders vs. family support; stigma concerns; disclosure comfort | Offer flexible service formats; collaborate with cultural supports; address confidentiality concerns |
| Decision-Making | Individual autonomy vs. family consensus; elder authority; gender-based patterns | Respect decision-making processes; avoid imposing Western autonomy values; facilitate family discussions |
Conclusion
Family grief counseling addresses the complex intersection of individual loss and systemic family responses, recognizing that bereavement affects entire family units while each member navigates their unique grief journey. Effective practice requires integration of family systems theory, grief and bereavement science, developmental understanding, and cultural competence. By facilitating adaptive communication, supporting role reorganization, honoring diverse grief expressions, and strengthening family resilience, counselors help families transform devastating loss into opportunities for growth and continued connection.
The field continues evolving as research identifies evidence-based practices, technology creates new service delivery options, and growing attention to diversity expands understanding of cultural influences on family grief. Contemporary family grief counselors must balance fidelity to empirically supported interventions with flexibility to meet individual family needs, honor cultural traditions, and respond to the unique circumstances of each loss. Through compassionate, skilled practice, family grief counselors serve as guides helping families navigate their darkest moments while discovering their capacity for healing and continued meaningful life together.
References
Bergstraesser, E., Inglin, S., Hornung, R., & Landolt, M. A. (2015). Dyadic coping of parents after the death of a child. Death Studies, 39(3), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2014.920434
Bowen, M. (1976). Family reaction to death. In P. J. Guerin (Ed.), Family therapy: Theory and practice (pp. 335-348). Gardner Press.
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. Basic Books.
Doka, K. J., & Tucci, A. S. (Eds.). (2009). Diversity and end-of-life care. Hospice Foundation of America.
Dowdney, L. (2000). Childhood bereavement following parental death. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(7), 819-830. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00670
Figley, C. R. (2002). Compassion fatigue: Psychotherapists’ chronic lack of self care. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(11), 1433-1441. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10090
Jordan, J. R., & McIntosh, J. L. (Eds.). (2011). Grief after suicide: Understanding the consequences and caring for the survivors. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166451
Kissane, D. W., McKenzie, M., Bloch, S., Moskowitz, C., McKenzie, D. P., & O’Neill, I. (2006). Family focused grief therapy: A randomized, controlled trial in palliative care and bereavement. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(7), 1208-1218. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.7.1208
Kokou-Kpolou, C. K., Fernández-Alcántara, M., & Cénat, J. M. (2020). Prolonged grief related to COVID-19 deaths: Do we have to fear a steep rise in traumatic and disenfranchised griefs? Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(S1), S94-S95. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000798
Nadeau, J. W. (2008). Meaning-making in bereaved families: Assessment, intervention, and future research. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, H. Schut, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention (pp. 511-530). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14498-024
Neimeyer, R. A. (Ed.). (2001). Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10397-000
Olson, D. (2011). FACES IV and the Circumplex Model: Validation study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37(1), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00175.x
Prigerson, H. G., Horowitz, M. J., Jacobs, S. C., Parkes, C. M., Aslan, M., Goodkin, K., Raphael, B., Marwit, S. J., Wortman, C., Neimeyer, R. A., Bonanno, G., Block, S. D., Kissane, D., Boelen, P., Maercker, A., Litz, B. T., Johnson, J. G., First, M. B., & Maciejewski, P. K. (2009). Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Medicine, 6(8), e1000121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121
Rando, T. A. (1986). Loss and anticipatory grief. Lexington Books.
Rosenblatt, P. C. (2008). Grief across cultures: A review and research agenda. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, H. Schut, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention (pp. 207-222). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14498-010
Rynearson, E. K., & Correa, F. (2008). Accommodation of bereavement and the posttraumatic stress disorder. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, H. Schut, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention (pp. 173-183). American Psychological Association.
Sandler, I. N., Ayers, T. S., Wolchik, S. A., Tein, J. Y., Kwok, O. M., Haine, R. A., Twohey-Jacobs, J., Suter, J., Lin, K., Padgett-Jones, S., Weyer, J. L., Cole, E., Kriege, G., & Griffin, W. A. (2010). The family bereavement program: Efficacy evaluation of a theory-based prevention program for parentally bereaved children and adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018396
Shapiro, E. R. (2008). Whose recovery, of what? Relationships and environments promoting grief and growth. Death Studies, 32(1), 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180701741277
Stroebe, M., & Schut, H. (1999). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies, 23(3), 197-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811899201046
Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (2007). Health outcomes of bereavement. The Lancet, 370(9603), 1960-1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61816-9
Webb, N. B. (Ed.). (2010). Helping bereaved children: A handbook for practitioners (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Worden, J. W. (2018). Grief counseling and grief therapy: A handbook for the mental health practitioner (5th ed.). Springer Publishing Company.