Cultural group counseling represents a specialized modality within group psychotherapy designed to address the complex interplay between cultural identity, socialization, group processes, and psychological well being among diverse populations. As global migration, multicultural interaction, and sociopolitical tension continue to reshape societies, culturally responsive group counseling has become an essential competency in the mental health professions. This approach integrates multicultural theory, social justice frameworks, and group dynamics to create inclusive environments where clients can explore identity development, discrimination, acculturation, intergroup conflict, and culturally shaped emotional expression. Research demonstrates that culturally attuned group interventions improve engagement, therapeutic alliance, emotional disclosure, and treatment outcomes for clients from marginalized and historically excluded communities. This article examines the theoretical foundations, cultural variables, mechanisms of change, intervention approaches, and empirical findings associated with cultural group counseling, while identifying challenges and directions for future practice.

Introduction to Cultural Group Counseling

Cultural group counseling has emerged as a core practice in clinical, community, and educational settings as mental health professionals increasingly recognize the importance of culture in shaping human behavior, identity, emotion, and interpersonal relationships. Traditional group counseling models were developed primarily with Western, individualistic populations in mind, which often limited their applicability across diverse cultural contexts. As a result, contemporary multicultural frameworks emphasize culturally responsive facilitation, inclusive communication norms, and an understanding of the sociopolitical forces that shape group behavior. These developments underscore the need for group interventions that validate diverse worldviews, promote equity, and facilitate healing for individuals navigating cultural stressors.

Professionals working in multicultural environments encounter clients whose experiences are influenced by ethnicity, race, nationality, migration history, socioeconomic status, spirituality, and intersectional identities. Cultural group counseling allows these experiences to be explored collectively, offering opportunities for shared meaning making and mutual support. Research indicates that culturally adapted interventions improve client engagement and reduce premature dropout, particularly among clients who may distrust mental health systems due to historical discrimination or cultural stigma (Smith et al., 2011). Within group structures, members gain insight into how culture informs emotion, communication, and coping, while also developing cross cultural empathy and deeper awareness of social context.

The relevance of cultural identity becomes especially salient in group settings where individuals negotiate belonging, roles, and interpersonal boundaries. Clients may enter groups with differing expectations about emotional disclosure, authority, and conflict resolution, all of which are culturally informed. A culturally attuned facilitator supports members in navigating these differences without reifying stereotypes or privileging dominant cultural norms. Instead, the goal is to cultivate a shared therapeutic climate that honors diversity while promoting cohesion and psychological safety.

Group counseling is uniquely positioned to support individuals experiencing acculturative stress, discrimination, or cultural adjustment. Immigrants, international students, refugees, and bicultural individuals often face challenges such as language barriers, identity conflict, and role redefinition within new sociocultural environments. Cultural group counseling provides a relational space to process these experiences, connect with others facing similar challenges, and strengthen cultural resilience. The group becomes a microcosm in which sociocultural dynamics can be understood, reinterpreted, and transformed.

As the field evolves, scholars highlight the importance of critical consciousness, cultural humility, and sociopolitical awareness in group facilitation. Cultural group counseling acknowledges that psychological distress is often shaped by systemic inequities, such as racism, xenophobia, colonial histories, and institutional barriers. The therapeutic process encourages clients to examine how these forces shape their lived experiences and to cultivate empowerment, agency, and community connection. This orientation aligns with emerging models of counseling that integrate multicultural competence, social justice, and collective healing.

Theoretical Foundations and Conceptual Frameworks

Cultural group counseling integrates multiple theoretical perspectives to capture the complexity of cultural dynamics in group psychotherapy. While early multicultural counseling frameworks focused largely on knowledge of cultural practices, contemporary models emphasize ongoing self reflection, intercultural dialogue, and attention to systemic power relations. These theoretical foundations guide facilitators in working effectively with culturally heterogeneous groups.

Multicultural Counseling Theory and Cultural Competence

Multicultural counseling theory provides a foundational lens for understanding the cultural dimensions of group work. Pioneering frameworks developed by Derald Wing Sue emphasize three core components of cultural competence: awareness of one’s cultural assumptions, knowledge of diverse worldviews, and skills for culturally responsive intervention. Within group settings, these competencies require facilitators to examine their cultural biases, understand the cultural identities of group members, and adapt interventions to culturally shaped values and communication styles.

Culturally competent group facilitators recognize that culture influences emotional expression, decision making, help seeking behaviors, and interpersonal norms. For example, clients from collectivistic cultures may prioritize group harmony and avoid direct confrontation, while those from individualistic cultures may value open self disclosure and assertiveness. Understanding these differences helps facilitators avoid misinterpreting behavior and fosters a more inclusive therapeutic climate. Cultural competence also requires awareness of intersectionality, acknowledging that individuals hold multiple, interacting identities that influence their group experience.

Social Identity Theory and Group Dynamics

Social identity theory provides a framework for understanding how cultural identities shape interactions within groups. Individuals derive part of their self concept from membership in social groups such as ethnic, racial, national, gender, or religious communities. These identities influence how group members perceive each other, interpret behavior, and navigate inclusion or exclusion. Social identity processes may lead to in group favoritism, out group bias, or internal conflict related to identity development.

Cultural group counseling uses these dynamics as therapeutic opportunities. Facilitators help members explore how their identities shape group participation, examine internalized beliefs, and build empathy across cultural differences. Discussions of privilege, oppression, and stereotyping often emerge organically within multicultural groups. When managed with cultural sensitivity, these conversations promote insight, solidarity, and deeper social awareness.

Acculturation, Biculturalism, and Cultural Adjustment

Acculturation theory is central to cultural group counseling for individuals navigating multiple cultural environments. Immigrants, refugees, and international students often experience shifts in cultural identity, social norms, and expectations as they adapt to new contexts. The acculturative process may involve assimilation, separation, integration, or marginalization, each carrying psychological implications. Group counseling enables clients to explore these transitions while receiving support from peers with similar experiences.

Bicultural individuals face additional complexities, such as balancing heritage cultural identities with those of the dominant culture. Group counseling fosters bicultural competence by encouraging members to reflect on cultural conflicts, strengths, and the evolution of identity across time. Facilitators support clients in recognizing the benefits of biculturalism, including flexibility, adaptability, and expanded social resources.

Critical Consciousness and Social Justice Approaches

Cultural group counseling increasingly incorporates critical consciousness frameworks derived from liberation psychology and critical pedagogy. These approaches encourage clients to analyze the sociopolitical systems that shape their lived experiences, including racism, colonial history, economic inequality, and institutional discrimination. By examining these forces collectively, group members develop a deeper understanding of how external realities influence internal experiences.

The integration of social justice perspectives positions group counseling as a space for empowerment and collective action. Facilitators promote dialogue about cultural oppression, validate experiences of discrimination, and encourage constructive coping strategies. This orientation aligns with the work of scholars who argue that cultural competence must extend beyond individual awareness to include systemic analysis and advocacy.

Core Processes and Cultural Dynamics in Group Counseling

Cultural group counseling operates at the intersection of interpersonal processes and cultural identity, which means that group dynamics are shaped not only by individual personalities but also by culturally patterned norms, expectations, and communication styles. Facilitators must understand how cultural variables influence participation, risk taking, emotional expression, and relational engagement. Differences in cultural values can affect how members interpret silence, assertiveness, conflict, and authority, all of which play central roles in group therapy. By attending to these dynamics, facilitators create a therapeutic environment that protects members from harm while fostering cross cultural understanding and inclusion.

Group cohesion remains one of the strongest predictors of therapeutic success in group counseling, but in multicultural contexts cohesion must be built intentionally through culturally congruent strategies. Members from marginalized or minority groups may initially remain guarded or skeptical, particularly if they have experienced discrimination in healthcare or mental health systems. Facilitators address these barriers by acknowledging cultural differences openly, creating norms for respectful dialogue, and validating diverse communication styles. Research suggests that when clients feel that their cultural identities are understood and respected, they are more likely to disclose personal experiences, form therapeutic alliances, and stay engaged throughout the group process.

Power dynamics are particularly salient in cultural group counseling. Group members may carry internalized hierarchies related to race, ethnicity, gender, class, or immigration status, which can surface in subtle ways during group interactions. Facilitators must remain alert to microaggressions, communication inequities, and implicit biases that may create emotional distress or replicate oppressive dynamics within the group. Rather than avoiding these tensions, culturally responsive facilitators use them as opportunities for insight and growth, guiding members toward empathy, accountability, and constructive dialogue.

Another core process in cultural group counseling is the negotiation of cultural narratives. Members often bring culturally shaped interpretations of mental health, family roles, help seeking, spirituality, and coping. When these narratives clash or misalign, group discussions can become emotionally charged. Facilitators help members explore conflicting cultural values, recognize areas of shared experience, and develop cultural humility. Through these processes, the group becomes a space where cultural identities are examined, deconstructed, and reconstructed in ways that promote psychological flexibility and self acceptance.

Communication Patterns and Cultural Variability

Communication styles differ widely across cultures, influencing how individuals express emotions, give feedback, handle conflict, and participate in collective decision making. These differences are amplified in group settings, where misinterpretations can easily occur without a shared cultural framework. Some cultures prioritize high context communication, relying on implicit cues, relational harmony, and nonverbal signals. Others use low context communication that values directness, clarity, and open self disclosure. Cultural group counseling teaches members to recognize these differences and adapt their interactions accordingly.

Emotional expression also varies substantially across cultural backgrounds. Clients from cultures with interdependent values may express distress indirectly or minimize personal emotions to preserve group cohesion. In contrast, clients from individualistic cultures may be more comfortable verbalizing intense emotions or challenging ideas openly. These differences can lead to misunderstandings or frustration unless the facilitator establishes norms that validate multiple modes of emotional expression. The goal is not to enforce uniform communication but to help participants understand and respect different emotional languages.

Power distance norms play a substantial role in group communication. In high power distance cultures, individuals may defer to the facilitator or dominant group members, avoiding disagreement or assertiveness. In low power distance cultures, clients may freely challenge ideas, question authority, or request clarification. Both patterns can create tension in culturally diverse groups. Effective facilitators explicitly discuss these differences, encourage equal participation, and model inclusive communication strategies. Over time, members learn to balance respect with authenticity, fostering an environment where diverse perspectives can coexist.

Language barriers may also influence communication, even when all members speak the same language. Clients who learned a second language later in life may struggle to express complex emotions or abstract concepts, especially under stress. This can create disparities in participation or misunderstandings about emotional depth. Facilitators accommodate these challenges by slowing the pace of discussion, offering reflective summaries, and validating the courage required to communicate across linguistic boundaries. When necessary, multilingual materials or culturally adapted metaphors can enhance understanding and comfort.

Finally, cultural norms around conflict vary significantly. Some cultures view conflict as destructive and prefer indirect approaches to problem solving, while others see conflict as a necessary pathway to authenticity and relationship strengthening. Cultural group counseling helps members understand these differences and adopt flexible strategies for managing disagreement. Facilitators promote constructive conflict resolution by guiding members to explore their cultural assumptions and use respectful communication to navigate difficult conversations. This process strengthens group cohesion and enhances members’ interpersonal competence beyond the therapeutic setting.

Culturally Responsive Intervention Models

Intervention models in cultural group counseling must be adaptable, flexible, and grounded in multicultural competence. Facilitators integrate frameworks such as cultural humility, culturally adapted cognitive behavioral therapy, narrative therapy, and social justice approaches, tailoring each model to the needs of the group. Cultural responsiveness involves recognizing when traditional interventions may conflict with cultural values or norms and adjusting methods to increase relevance and effectiveness. Adaptation enhances engagement, reduces resistance, and ensures that interventions align with clients’ lived realities.

Culturally adapted cognitive behavioral group therapy is one widely used model. Standard CBT emphasizes individual beliefs, personal responsibility, and direct cognitive restructuring, which may not resonate with collectivistic or relational cultures. Culturally adapted versions incorporate communal values, spiritual beliefs, storytelling, and group based problem solving. Facilitators may use culturally relevant analogies, incorporate traditional healing practices, or modify assignments to emphasize relational support rather than individual autonomy. Research shows that culturally adapted CBT improves outcomes for diverse populations across anxiety, depression, trauma, and adjustment concerns.

Narrative group therapy is another powerful intervention in multicultural contexts. This approach positions culture as a lens through which individuals understand their personal stories. Group members explore how cultural narratives, societal expectations, and historical forces have shaped their identities and experiences. Through collective storytelling, members identify dominant narratives that limit their well being and co create alternative narratives that reflect resilience, cultural pride, and empowerment. Facilitators use narrative techniques to help members externalize problems, contextualize distress, and reclaim agency.

Social justice oriented group counseling frameworks incorporate critical consciousness, activism, and systemic analysis. These models encourage members to examine the structural forces influencing their mental health, such as racism, xenophobia, poverty, labor exploitation, and immigration policies. Facilitators guide discussions that validate experiences of oppression and support members in developing empowerment strategies. Some groups incorporate community engagement, advocacy planning, or collective healing rituals derived from cultural traditions. These interventions strengthen solidarity, cultural resilience, and collective identity.

Emotion focused and process oriented models can also be culturally adapted. In emotionally expressive cultures, facilitators may encourage deeper exploration of affective experiences, while in more restrained cultures they may focus on building trust and normalizing emotional vulnerability. Process oriented discussions often highlight relational patterns shaped by culture, allowing members to recognize how cultural values influence attachment, boundaries, and interpersonal expectations. Through these dialogues, members cultivate greater emotional intelligence and cross cultural empathy.

Culturally grounded group models developed for specific populations offer additional guidance. Examples include Native American healing circles, Afrocentric empowerment groups, Latinx pláticas, and Asian American support groups that use culturally congruent communication norms. These models reflect collective wisdom, community practices, and cultural rituals that honor heritage and foster belonging. Integrating such approaches into multicultural counseling settings requires sensitivity, cultural authorization, and collaboration with cultural leaders or elders.

Challenges, Barriers, and Ethical Concerns in Cultural Group Counseling

Cultural group counseling presents unique challenges that require skillful facilitation and ongoing self reflection. One major challenge is managing cultural misunderstandings or conflicts that arise when group members interpret behaviors through culturally specific lenses. Miscommunication may lead to assumptions of disrespect, avoidance, or insensitivity. Facilitators must intervene early to clarify intentions, promote curiosity over judgment, and encourage members to articulate their cultural frameworks. These interventions transform misunderstandings into opportunities for growth and deeper cultural competence.

Another significant barrier is varying comfort levels with emotional disclosure. Some clients may view discussing personal issues in a group as inappropriate or shameful due to cultural norms around privacy, family reputation, or collective identity. Others may hesitate because of immigration trauma, experiences of discrimination, or fear of judgment from similar cultural peers. Facilitators build safety gradually by modeling vulnerability, validating concerns, and offering structured activities that increase comfort with sharing. Respecting boundaries while gently expanding emotional range is key to successful engagement.

Ethical concerns also arise in multicultural group contexts. Confidentiality may be threatened in small cultural communities where members know each other outside the group or fear that information might spread informally. Facilitators must establish strong confidentiality agreements, address cultural expectations about privacy, and monitor group dynamics for breaches. Additionally, facilitators must remain aware of power differentials that exist not only culturally but also within the therapeutic space. Cultural humility, transparency, and collaborative decision making help mitigate these risks.

Bias and microaggressions pose another ethical challenge. Members may unintentionally express stereotypes or biases that cause harm to others. When such incidents occur, facilitators must respond promptly and skillfully to validate the harmed member, foster accountability, and maintain group cohesion. The goal is neither to avoid conflict nor to shame individuals but to transform harmful interactions into learning moments that deepen awareness and respect. This requires courage, emotional intelligence, and strong grounding in multicultural ethics.

Finally, facilitators themselves bring cultural identities, biases, and blind spots into the group. Without ongoing self reflection, supervision, and professional development, facilitators may unconsciously reinforce dominant cultural norms or silence marginalized voices. Ethical practice requires continuous examination of personal assumptions, openness to feedback, and willingness to acknowledge mistakes. By modeling cultural humility, facilitators encourage members to adopt the same stance, creating an environment where everyone participates in shared learning and mutual growth.

Applications Across Clinical, Educational, and Community Settings

Cultural group counseling is used across a wide range of professional contexts, each with unique goals, structural considerations, and population needs. In clinical mental health settings, such as hospitals, outpatient centers, and community clinics, cultural group counseling addresses anxiety, depression, trauma, acculturation challenges, and identity related distress among culturally diverse clients. Clinicians incorporate culturally adapted evidence based interventions while attending to structural barriers such as financial constraints, linguistic needs, and limited access to culturally competent care. Group formats in clinical environments often combine psychoeducation with emotional processing to create a balanced and culturally responsive therapeutic experience.

In school and university settings, cultural group counseling supports students navigating cultural identity development, academic pressure, intergroup conflict, and transitions between cultural contexts. International students, first generation college students, and bicultural adolescents benefit from group experiences that normalize identity conflict and provide tools for cross cultural communication. Facilitators in educational environments often integrate developmental frameworks with multicultural models that help students explore emerging identities and strengthen resilience. Groups may also focus on discrimination, stereotyping, or cultural stress, providing a supportive environment where students can process these experiences safely and constructively.

Community based applications of cultural group counseling extend to nonprofit organizations, refugee resettlement agencies, cultural centers, and faith based institutions. These groups often address the collective trauma, displacement, and sociopolitical challenges experienced by immigrants, refugees, and minority communities. Community based facilitators collaborate with cultural leaders, elders, or community healers to ensure cultural authenticity and trust. Interventions may incorporate storytelling, traditional rituals, or community dialogue practices that align with cultural norms. This integrative approach enhances psychological well being while strengthening communal resilience.

Corporate and organizational settings increasingly use cultural group interventions to address diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) challenges. Employee resource groups, cross cultural communication workshops, and intergroup dialogue programs help employees explore identity, bias, and workplace belonging. Cultural group counseling principles guide facilitators in addressing microaggressions, power imbalances, and cross cultural misunderstandings in professional environments. These interventions contribute to healthier organizational cultures, improved team cohesion, and more equitable workplace practices.

Telehealth applications of cultural group counseling have expanded rapidly. Virtual platforms allow individuals from geographically dispersed cultural communities to meet in culturally specific or multicultural groups. Online environments can reduce stigma and increase access for individuals who may feel uncomfortable attending in person sessions due to cultural, linguistic, or mobility related concerns. Telehealth groups require thoughtful adaptation, such as culturally sensitive online norms, trauma informed digital engagement strategies, and multilingual materials. Research suggests that virtual multicultural groups can achieve outcomes similar to in person formats when facilitated with cultural competence and intentional design.

Evidence Base and Effectiveness of Cultural Group Counseling

The empirical literature on cultural group counseling demonstrates significant benefits for emotional well being, identity integration, cross cultural competence, and interpersonal functioning. Research consistently shows that culturally adapted group interventions lead to higher engagement, greater satisfaction, and improved outcomes compared to non adapted approaches. These findings highlight the importance of cultural responsiveness in shaping therapeutic processes and treatment success across diverse populations.

Meta analyses on culturally adapted mental health interventions reveal that cultural adaptations significantly improve therapeutic effectiveness, particularly for clients from ethnic minority backgrounds (Griner & Smith, 2006). Adaptations that incorporate cultural metaphors, language considerations, communal values, and identity exploration show especially strong results. Culturally adapted group therapy tends to produce moderate to large effect sizes across depression, anxiety, trauma, and adjustment concerns. These outcomes underscore the value of aligning interventions with clients’ cultural frameworks and lived experiences.

Research on intergroup dialogue groups, a specific form of cultural group counseling used in educational and community settings, demonstrates improvements in empathy, perspective taking, and awareness of structural inequities. Participants in intergroup dialogue report increased capacity to navigate difficult conversations about race, gender, culture, and power. Studies show that these groups foster critical consciousness and strengthen members’ commitment to social justice and multicultural competence (Gurin et al., 2013). These outcomes are particularly relevant for multicultural societies facing polarization or identity related conflict.

Refugee and immigrant groups demonstrate additional evidence of effectiveness. Group interventions for refugees often incorporate trauma informed, resilience based, and culturally grounded methods such as storytelling, cultural rituals, or community healing practices. Research indicates that these groups reduce symptoms of posttraumatic stress, depression, and anxiety while enhancing social support and cultural adjustment (Kira et al., 2012). Facilitators who collaborate with cultural leaders and integrate community traditions increase engagement and treatment compliance among refugee populations.

Identity based cultural groups, such as those designed for Black, Asian American, Latinx, Indigenous, and LGBTQ+ communities, show strong therapeutic benefits when facilitated with cultural humility and systemic awareness. Members often report increased cultural pride, reduced internalized oppression, and strengthened coping strategies for dealing with discrimination. Research suggests that group spaces offering cultural affirmation can counteract the negative psychological effects of racism, microaggressions, and marginalization (Williams et al., 2018). These groups function as protective environments that bolster resilience, belonging, and empowerment.

Finally, cultural group counseling demonstrates strong outcomes in professional and organizational settings. Studies highlight improvements in intercultural communication skills, reduced bias, and enhanced workplace cohesion when employees participate in culturally informed group interventions. Intergroup dialogue programs and diversity dialogue circles have been shown to reduce prejudice and improve team functioning in multicultural workplaces. These findings indicate that cultural group counseling is not only clinically effective but also valuable for organizational development and community cohesion.

Conclusion

Cultural group counseling represents an essential evolution of traditional group psychotherapy, addressing the increasingly multicultural realities of modern societies. By integrating multicultural theory, social justice frameworks, culturally responsive communication practices, and identity affirming interventions, cultural group counseling creates therapeutic spaces capable of honoring diversity while promoting psychological well being. This modality acknowledges that cultural identities shape emotional expression, interpersonal relationships, coping strategies, and engagement with mental health services, making culturally attuned group approaches indispensable for equitable and effective care.

The evidence base for cultural group counseling is robust, demonstrating significant benefits across clinical, educational, organizational, and community contexts. Culturally adapted group interventions improve engagement, reduce distress, enhance identity integration, and strengthen cross cultural understanding. These outcomes highlight the therapeutic power of shared experiences and collective meaning making, especially for individuals navigating cultural stress, discrimination, or identity conflict. As global migration and cultural diversity continue to expand, the demand for culturally responsive group counseling will grow in parallel.

Future directions for research and practice include developing more culturally specific group models, refining virtual adaptations, and expanding community led and Indigenous healing approaches. Facilitators must remain committed to cultural humility, continuous learning, and systemic awareness to address dynamic cultural needs. By doing so, cultural group counseling will continue to advance as a transformative modality that bridges cultural differences, fosters empathy, and promotes collective healing across diverse populations.

References

1. Griner, D., & Smith, T. B. (2006). Culturally adapted mental health interventions: A meta analytic review. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.43.4.531

2. Gurin, P., Nagda, B. A., & Zúñiga, X. (2013). Dialogue across difference: Practice, theory, and research on intergroup dialogue. Russell Sage Foundation. https://www.russellsage.org/publications/dialogue-across-difference

3. Kira, I. A., Ahmed, A., Mahmoud, V., & Wassan, R. (2012). Group therapy for refugees and torture survivors: Cultural, religious, and clinical considerations. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(3), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01160.x

4. Smith, T. B., Rodriguez, M. D., & Bernal, G. (2011). Cultural adaptations of psychological treatments: A meta analytic review. Psychotherapy, 48(4), 404–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022061

5. Williams, D. R., Lawrence, J. A., & Davis, B. A. (2018). Racism and health: Evidence and needed research. Annual Review of Public Health, 40, 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013918

6. Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2016). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Counseling+the+Culturally+Diverse%3A+Theory+and+Practice%2C+7th+Edition-p-9781119084303

7. Goodman, R. D., & Gorski, P. C. (2015). Decolonizing multicultural counseling through social justice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1283-4

8. Nagda, B. A. (2006). Breaking barriers, crossing borders, building bridges: Communication processes in intergroup dialogues. Journal of Social Issues, 62(3), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00473.x

9. Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2020). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (6th ed.). Basic Books. https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/irvin-d-yalom/the-theory-and-practice-of-group-psychotherapy/9781541617568/

10. Ratts, M. J., Singh, A. A., Nassar-McMillan, S., Butler, S. K., & McCullough, J. R. (2016). Multicultural and social justice counseling competencies. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 44(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12035