Group counseling for grief is an evidence based therapeutic approach designed to support individuals coping with the emotional, cognitive, behavioral, existential, and relational challenges associated with loss. Grief groups provide a structured, supportive environment where participants can share experiences, normalize emotional reactions, build coping skills, and construct meaning after bereavement or other forms of significant loss. Research demonstrates that group-based grief interventions reduce symptoms of complicated grief, depression, anxiety, and loneliness while enhancing social connection, emotional regulation, resilience, and adaptive mourning processes. Grounded in theoretical frameworks such as attachment theory, meaning reconstruction, narrative therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and the dual process model of coping with bereavement, group counseling for grief offers a multidimensional pathway toward healing. This article examines the foundations, mechanisms, models, and applications of grief group counseling across diverse cultural, developmental, and clinical contexts.
Introduction to Group Counseling for Grief
Group counseling for grief has become a central component of bereavement care because grief itself is an inherently relational and social experience. While loss is universally experienced, individuals often feel isolated, misunderstood, or emotionally overwhelmed during the grieving process. Group counseling offers a safe and validating space where individuals can express their emotions openly, share stories of their loss, witness others’ experiences, and receive empathy from those who genuinely understand the complexities of grief. This combination of social support and therapeutic structure reduces isolation, strengthens emotional resilience, and facilitates adaptive mourning.
Grief disrupts cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functioning. Individuals may experience intrusive memories, sadness, guilt, anger, longing, confusion, or numbness. Many struggle to make sense of life without the deceased or to adjust to new roles and identities. Avoidance behaviors may emerge as individuals attempt to cope with pain or suppress reminders of the loss. Group counseling addresses these difficulties by creating a nonjudgmental environment where members can process emotions, confront painful memories, and receive guidance as they reconstruct meaning and reorganize daily life.
Group counseling also helps counteract cultural stigma surrounding grief. In many societies, expectations for “moving on” or “staying strong” may discourage authentic emotional expression. Grieving individuals may feel pressure to suppress their feelings or to meet unrealistic timelines of recovery. Group counseling creates a culturally sensitive and emotionally open space that validates grief as a natural, human process rather than a pathology. Through shared narratives and group rituals, members develop a deeper understanding of grief’s individuality and universality.
From a clinical standpoint, grief groups are applied in hospitals, hospice programs, community organizations, mental health centers, schools, and workplaces. They are particularly effective for individuals dealing with death related loss, ambiguous loss, anticipatory grief, traumatic grief, or grief associated with divorce, illness, migration, or life transitions. Group counseling for grief can be structured, semi structured, or process oriented, depending on therapeutic goals and population needs. As the global demand for bereavement support continues to increase, group counseling remains a vital modality for promoting healing and resilience after loss.
Theoretical Foundations of Group Counseling for Grief
Group counseling for grief is grounded in several theoretical models that explain how individuals experience and adapt to loss. One foundational framework is attachment theory, which posits that grief reflects the disruption of a meaningful attachment bond. According to this view, emotional pain following loss arises from the absence of the attachment figure who provided safety, comfort, and identity continuity. Group counseling helps individuals explore the nature of that bond, process the emotional impact of its loss, and develop new strategies for connection and emotional regulation.
Another influential model is the dual process theory of coping with bereavement, which suggests that individuals oscillate between loss oriented coping (focusing on pain, memories, and emotions) and restoration oriented coping (addressing life changes, roles, and responsibilities). Grief groups provide space for both processes, allowing members to express sorrow while also building skills for adapting to new circumstances. This flexible approach helps individuals avoid getting stuck in either emotional overwhelm or emotional suppression.
Meaning reconstruction theory emphasizes the cognitive and existential challenges of grief. Loss often disrupts deeply held beliefs about identity, purpose, fairness, and continuity. Individuals may struggle to integrate the loss into their life narrative. Group counseling supports meaning making by encouraging storytelling, reflection, and reinterpretation of the relationship with the deceased. Members help one another identify themes of love, legacy, connection, and resilience, which facilitates a renewed sense of coherence and purpose.
Narrative therapy also plays an important role in group grief counseling. Storytelling allows individuals to externalize their grief, articulate their relationship with the deceased, and construct narratives that honor the past while supporting future growth. Hearing others’ stories helps participants expand their understanding of grief and recognize that there are many valid ways to mourn. In group formats, narrative work fosters bonding, emotional clarity, and shared insight.
Cognitive behavioral models highlight the influence of thoughts and behaviors on emotional adjustment after loss. Individuals may interpret the loss in ways that intensify guilt, helplessness, or hopelessness. They may develop avoidance patterns that maintain distress or interfere with healthy adjustment. CBT based grief groups help members identify maladaptive thoughts, challenge inaccurate beliefs, and adopt behaviors that promote engagement, emotional regulation, and coping. These groups often incorporate relaxation training, grounding techniques, and behavioral activation to support gradual reengagement with life.
Finally, trauma informed frameworks guide grief groups when the loss involves violence, sudden death, disaster, or complex trauma. Traumatic bereavement often includes intrusive memories, hyperarousal, dissociation, and difficulty integrating the loss. Trauma informed group counseling emphasizes emotional safety, stabilization, and gradual processing. Members are encouraged to develop coping strategies that support nervous system regulation and reduce reactivity.
Core Therapeutic Mechanisms and Processes of Change
Group counseling for grief works through several core therapeutic mechanisms that promote emotional healing, relational support, and adaptive coping. One of the most important mechanisms is universality, which helps individuals recognize that others share similar feelings of longing, guilt, anger, numbness, or disorientation after loss. Grief often leads individuals to believe their reactions are abnormal or excessive, especially when the surrounding environment expects rapid recovery or emotional control. By hearing others describe parallel experiences, group members feel less alone and more understood, reducing shame and self criticism.
Another central mechanism is emotional expression, which is essential for processing grief but often constrained in everyday social contexts. Many individuals feel pressure to hide their emotions or protect others from their pain. Group counseling provides a supportive setting where sadness, anger, fear, and yearning can be expressed without judgment. Emotional disclosure allows members to articulate feelings that may have been suppressed and facilitates the integration of painful memories. Over time, expressing grief in the group reduces the emotional intensity of the loss and fosters resilience.
Social support and empathy also play critical roles in grief groups. Participants often feel understood for the first time since the loss, especially when friends or family members are unable to respond adequately. Empathic listening, shared sorrow, and genuine validation from peers strengthen a sense of belonging and connection. This relational support mitigates loneliness, which is one of the strongest predictors of prolonged or complicated grief. The reciprocal nature of group support also increases members’ self efficacy and sense of purpose as they help others navigate their grief.
Another important mechanism is meaning making, which involves helping individuals reconstruct their worldview, identity, and sense of purpose following loss. Grief often disrupts beliefs about fairness, control, predictability, and identity continuity. Through discussion, reflection, and narrative sharing, members explore how the loss fits into their broader life story and identify sources of meaning that persist beyond the death. Facilitators guide participants in recognizing legacies, values, or lessons that the deceased has left behind, which supports emotional integration rather than avoidance.
Group counseling also fosters behavioral activation and role adjustment, especially when loss disrupts daily responsibilities or identity roles. Individuals may struggle with the practical challenges of living without the deceased or feel paralyzed by uncertainty. Group members support one another in setting manageable goals, reestablishing routines, and taking small steps toward engagement with life. These behaviors gradually restore functioning and help individuals adapt to new realities.
Group Dynamics in Grief Focused Counseling
Group dynamics in grief counseling are shaped by the emotional intensity of the material, the vulnerability of participants, and the diversity of grief experiences represented within the group. Early sessions often involve a mixture of hesitation, sadness, and apprehension as members face the emotional task of sharing deeply personal losses. Facilitators help shape group norms by emphasizing confidentiality, compassion, mutual respect, and nonjudgmental listening. As group cohesion develops, members become more willing to disclose sensitive experiences and explore their inner worlds.
A common dynamic in grief groups is asymmetry in loss type or timing. Some members may have experienced recent loss and feel overwhelmed, while others may be months or years into grieving and appear more stable. These differences can generate complex emotional responses. Individuals early in their grief may feel inadequate when comparing themselves to those who seem further along, while those further along may feel reactivated by the raw pain of newer losses. Facilitators normalize these differences and help members appreciate the diversity of grieving timelines rather than viewing them as indicators of progress.
Another dynamic involves protective behavior, where some individuals may attempt to shield others from distress by minimizing their own emotions or avoiding difficult topics. This tendency often arises from fear of burdening others or reactivating others’ grief. Facilitators encourage balanced emotional expression and remind the group that authentic sharing is essential for mutual healing. Over time, members learn that expressing vulnerability strengthens group cohesion rather than harming others.
Emotional contagion is also relevant in grief groups. Hearing intense stories or expressions of despair can temporarily increase distress among members. Facilitators mitigate this by integrating grounding exercises, coping skills, and reflective discussions that help members regulate their emotions. They ensure that the group remains a supportive and stabilizing environment rather than one that amplifies suffering.
Another important dynamic is differential grieving styles. Some individuals grieve more cognitively, focusing on understanding the loss, while others grieve affectively, expressing intense emotion. Some are action oriented, seeking solutions or tasks, while others need time for reflection and stillness. These differing styles can at times cause misunderstanding among members. Facilitators help individuals appreciate diverse grieving expressions and reduce judgments about what grief “should” look like.
Finally, facilitators must monitor boundary issues. Because grief evokes intense interpersonal connections, some members may form strong bonds or rely heavily on one another for emotional support. While such connections can be healing, facilitators ensure that boundaries remain healthy and that the group does not become the sole source of support for any individual. Clear structure and consistent guidelines maintain therapeutic focus and prevent dependency.
Types of Group Counseling Models for Grief
Group counseling for grief includes multiple therapeutic models that vary in structure, theoretical orientation, and goals. These models can be structured, semi structured, or process oriented depending on the population, type of loss, and treatment context.
Psychoeducational Grief Groups
Psychoeducational groups provide foundational knowledge about grief, including typical emotional, cognitive, physical, and behavioral reactions. Facilitators teach members about the variability of grief timelines, the influence of attachment bonds, and the impact of stress on coping. These groups help individuals understand that grief is a natural and complex process rather than a disorder. Psychoeducation reduces anxiety about emotional reactions and empowers members to navigate their mourning with greater clarity.
In addition to education, these groups introduce coping skills such as journaling, communication strategies, grounding techniques, and self care practices. They are particularly helpful for individuals who feel overwhelmed by unfamiliar emotions or who face social environments where grief is not openly discussed. Psychoeducational groups are commonly offered in hospices, hospitals, community centers, and schools.
Cognitive Behavioral Grief Groups
CBT based grief groups focus on identifying and modifying maladaptive thoughts and behaviors that maintain distress. After loss, individuals may develop cognitive distortions such as excessive guilt, blaming themselves for the death, believing they should have prevented it, or interpreting the loss as evidence of personal failure. CBT groups help members examine these thoughts, challenge inaccurate beliefs, and replace them with more balanced interpretations.
Behavioral strategies are also central to CBT grief groups. Members identify avoidance patterns that prolong suffering, such as avoiding reminders of the deceased, withdrawing from relationships, or refusing to engage in meaningful activities. Through behavioral activation and exposure based exercises, participants gradually confront avoided situations and rebuild routines. Peer encouragement reinforces accountability and promotes adaptive functioning.
Narrative and Meaning Centered Grief Groups
Narrative therapy emphasizes the healing power of storytelling. Members share the story of their loss, explore their relationship with the deceased, and construct narratives that honor both the pain and the meaning embedded in the relationship. Facilitators encourage members to reflect on how the loss has shaped their identity and life path. This process helps individuals develop a coherent sense of self after bereavement.
Meaning centered groups build on the work of Viktor Frankl and subsequent existential theorists. These groups focus on exploring values, sources of meaning, spiritual beliefs, and personal growth. Members examine how the loss has altered their worldview and identify ways to cultivate meaning through legacy, connection, or purposeful action. These groups are especially helpful for individuals grappling with existential questions or profound disruptions in identity.
Support and Process Oriented Grief Groups
Support groups emphasize emotional sharing, mutual empathy, and interpersonal connection. These groups often have open formats, allowing members to join and leave according to their needs. Facilitators maintain structure while allowing flexibility for members to share relevant experiences. Process oriented grief groups explore emotions, relationship patterns, and internal conflicts in real time. They are less structured and focus on deepening emotional insight and relational healing.
Support and process groups are particularly beneficial for individuals seeking a safe space to express grief, feel understood, and receive ongoing support. The group environment fosters bonding and reduces isolation, making these models widely used in hospices, community organizations, and bereavement programs.
Trauma Informed Grief Groups
Traumatic grief groups integrate principles from trauma therapy, particularly when loss involves sudden, violent, or catastrophic events. Members may experience intrusive memories, hyperarousal, dissociation, or difficulty integrating the traumatic elements of the death. Trauma informed groups emphasize stabilization, grounding, nervous system regulation, and gradual exposure to grief related material. Facilitators prioritize emotional safety and avoid overwhelming participants.
These groups often incorporate psychoeducation about trauma responses, coping strategies for managing physiological arousal, and exercises that support dual attention processing. Trauma informed models help individuals process grief without becoming retraumatized and support gradual restoration of safety and coherence.
Table 1. Major Group Models for Grief and Their Therapeutic Focus
| Group Model | Primary Focus | Key Therapeutic Goals |
|---|---|---|
| Psychoeducational Groups | Knowledge and coping skills | Reduce confusion, enhance emotional regulation |
| CBT Grief Groups | Cognitions and behaviors | Challenge guilt, reduce avoidance, rebuild functioning |
| Narrative Groups | Storytelling and identity | Meaning construction, emotional integration |
| Support/Process Groups | Emotional expression and empathy | Reduce isolation, strengthen connection |
| Trauma Informed Groups | Safety and stabilization | Regulate arousal, integrate traumatic loss |
Applications in Clinical, Hospice, Educational, and Community Settings
Group counseling for grief is applied across diverse service settings to support individuals coping with bereavement, anticipatory grief, traumatic loss, and non-death losses. In clinical mental health settings, grief groups are often integrated into outpatient therapy programs for individuals experiencing complicated grief, depressive symptoms, or prolonged mourning. These groups provide structured processing, cognitive restructuring, and skills training to address rumination, guilt, avoidance, and identity disruption. Clinicians use group formats to enhance emotional regulation, foster healthy adjustment, and prevent the onset of chronic psychological distress.
Hospice and palliative care programs use grief groups extensively to support family members after a loved one’s death. Hospice-based groups provide a unique combination of psychoeducation, emotional processing, and meaning making grounded in an understanding of end-of-life experiences. Facilitation often integrates rituals, legacy discussions, and reflection exercises that help members honor the deceased and navigate major role transitions. Hospice grief groups are particularly effective because members share a common context of caregiving, terminal illness, and anticipated loss.
Schools and universities use grief groups to help children and adolescents cope with loss related to death, divorce, relocation, illness, or major life transitions. Young people often lack vocabulary and coping skills to articulate grief, making the supportive structure of group counseling especially beneficial. School-based grief groups integrate expressive activities, creative arts, role plays, and developmentally appropriate discussions that help students identify emotions, develop social support, and maintain functioning during a period of cognitive and emotional immaturity.
Community organizations and faith-based institutions frequently offer grief groups to meet the needs of culturally diverse populations. These groups incorporate culturally meaningful rituals, spiritual frameworks, and collective narratives that resonate with community values. Community-based grief programs often focus on mutual aid, collective healing, and long-term companionship, supporting individuals through extended mourning periods. By reducing financial barriers and stigma, community programs increase access for underserved populations.
Workplaces and crisis response teams use grief groups in organizational settings following unexpected deaths, accidents, or traumatic events. These groups focus on psychological first aid, emotional stabilization, peer support, and coping strategies directed at both individual well-being and group cohesion. Organizational grief groups help employees navigate shock, restore functioning, and manage the ripple effects of loss within professional contexts.
Telehealth based grief groups have expanded significantly, increasing accessibility for individuals who face mobility challenges, rural isolation, medical conditions, or cultural stigma. Virtual platforms allow members to participate from home, creating a sense of safety that can be especially helpful for those experiencing traumatic grief. Research shows that online grief groups can produce outcomes comparable to in person interventions when facilitated with clear structure and supportive dynamics.
Cultural, Developmental, and Ethical Considerations
Cultural context plays a central role in shaping grief expression, mourning practices, and expectations for recovery. In some cultures, grief is expressed openly through rituals, communal support, or public mourning, while in others emotional expression is more private and restrained. Group facilitators must demonstrate cultural humility, adapt interventions to honor cultural mourning traditions, and avoid imposing Western timelines or norms of grief processing. Sensitivity to cultural differences in communication, spirituality, and emotional expression enhances group cohesion and ensures that all members feel respected and understood.
Developmental considerations are equally important. Children grieve differently from adolescents, and both differ from adults and older adults. Young children may express grief through play, regression, or behavioral changes rather than verbal expression. Adolescents may struggle with identity formation, peer acceptance, and intense emotional reactivity. Adults may confront role loss, financial strain, or caregiving responsibilities. Older adults may face multiple simultaneous losses, chronic illness, or social isolation. Tailoring group formats to developmental stage improves engagement, emotional safety, and relevance.
Ethical considerations in grief group counseling include managing intense emotions, protecting confidentiality, and responding to crisis situations. Members may disclose suicidal thoughts, self blame, or traumatic details of the loss. Facilitators must establish clear protocols for risk assessment, safety planning, and individual follow up. They must also foster a safe environment where members feel comfortable sharing without fear of judgment or breach of privacy. Maintaining appropriate boundaries, monitoring group dynamics, and avoiding dual roles ensures the integrity of the therapeutic process.
Another ethical challenge arises when members attempt to compare or rank their losses, sometimes minimizing their experiences or invalidating others’. Facilitators intervene to reframe grief as inherently subjective and to emphasize that all losses deserve recognition. Ensuring that no member dominates discussions and that emotional labor is distributed equitably supports long-term group stability.
Effectiveness and Research Evidence
A substantial body of research supports the effectiveness of group counseling for grief, particularly among individuals experiencing complicated grief, prolonged grief disorder, or bereavement related depression. Meta analyses show that group interventions significantly reduce symptoms of sadness, loneliness, intrusive thoughts, and functional impairment (Wagner et al., 2006). Group-based grief therapy is especially beneficial because it provides both emotional processing and social support, two essential components of adaptive mourning.
Cognitive behavioral grief groups demonstrate strong empirical support for reducing maladaptive thoughts, guilt, avoidance, and depressive symptoms. Studies show that CBT based grief interventions decrease intrusive cognitions, enhance emotional regulation, and support reengagement in meaningful activities (Boelen et al., 2007). Behavioral activation components are particularly effective in counteracting withdrawal and inactivity.
Narrative and meaning centered grief groups are supported by research showing improvement in meaning reconstruction, identity coherence, and existential well-being. Meaning centered group interventions have been shown to reduce distress among individuals coping with cancer related bereavement and traumatic loss (Lee, 2008). These models help individuals reinterpret the loss within a larger life narrative and build resilience.
Support and process oriented grief groups demonstrate effectiveness in reducing loneliness, relational withdrawal, and emotional suppression. Group cohesion, empathy, and relationship building contribute significantly to these outcomes. Although process groups may be less structured, their focus on relational healing aligns well with the interpersonal dimensions of grief.
Trauma informed grief groups are effective for individuals experiencing traumatic loss, including sudden death, homicide, accidents, or disaster related deaths. Research indicates that trauma focused group interventions reduce posttraumatic stress symptoms and facilitate gradual integration of grief emotions (Shear et al., 2014). Trauma informed approaches help members rebuild a sense of safety and stabilize emotional regulation before moving deeper into grief processing.
Telehealth based grief groups show encouraging evidence, with studies demonstrating reductions in grief intensity, depression, and loneliness similar to those seen in in person groups. Digital formats expand access while maintaining therapeutic benefits.
Overall, the research demonstrates that group counseling for grief is a powerful and versatile modality that supports emotional expression, meaning making, resilience, and healthy adaptation following loss.
Conclusion
Group counseling for grief is a clinically effective and culturally adaptable intervention that supports individuals through one of the most challenging human experiences. Through social connection, emotional expression, cognitive restructuring, meaning making, and behavioral activation, grief groups provide a comprehensive pathway toward healing and adaptation. The group format uniquely addresses isolation, strengthens resilience, and honors the individuality of grief while situating it within a shared human context.
The versatility of group counseling for grief makes it suitable for clinical, hospice, educational, community, and telehealth settings. Cultural and developmental sensitivity further enhances the effectiveness and inclusivity of these interventions. Extensive research supports group counseling as a core component of modern bereavement care, particularly for individuals at risk of complicated or prolonged grief reactions.
As global needs for grief support continue to grow, group counseling remains an essential, scalable, and evidence informed approach that honors the complexity of loss and supports the restoration of meaning, connection, and well being.
References
-
Boelen, P. A., de Keijser, J., van den Hout, M. A., & van den Bout, J. (2007). Treatment of complicated grief: A comparison between cognitive behavioral therapy and supportive counseling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.277
-
Lee, V. (2008). The existential plight of cancer: Meaning making as a mediator of well being. Palliative & Supportive Care, 6(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951508000101
-
Shear, M. K., Ghesquiere, A., & Glickman, K. (2013). Bereavement and complicated grief. Current Psychiatry Reports, 15(11), 406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-013-0406-z
-
Wagner, B., Knaevelsrud, C., & Maercker, A. (2006). Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for complicated grief: A randomized controlled trial. Death Studies, 30(5), 429–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180600614385
-
Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (2007). Health outcomes of bereavement. The Lancet, 370(9603), 1960–1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61816-9
-
Neimeyer, R. A. (2000). Searching for the meaning of meaning: Grief therapy and the process of reconstruction. Death Studies, 24(6), 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180050121480
-
Currier, J. M., Neimeyer, R. A., & Berman, J. S. (2008). The effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions for bereaved persons: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(8), 971–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20599
-
Burke, L. A., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2013). Prospective risk factors for complicated grief: A review of the empirical literature. Death Studies, 37(6), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2012.736123
-
Supiano, K. P., & Luptak, M. (2014). Complicated grief in older adults: A randomized controlled trial of group therapy. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt047
-
Harms, L., Talbot, M., & Gillies, M. (2019). Grief and loss: The role of group counseling in community recovery. Australian Social Work, 72(3), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2018.1560972
-
Papa, A., Lancaster, N. G., & Kahler, J. (2014). Commonalities in grief responding across bereavement and non-bereavement losses. Journal of Affective Disorders, 161, 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.02.040
-
Lichtenthal, W. G., Currier, J. M., Neimeyer, R. A., & Keesee, N. J. (2010). Sense and significance: A mixed methods examination of meaning making after loss. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(7), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20700
-
Rosner, R., Pfoh, G., Kotoučová, M., & Hagl, M. (2014). Efficacy of an outpatient treatment program for prolonged grief disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 167, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.035
-
O’Connor, M. F., Wellisch, D. K., Stanton, A. L., Eisenberger, N. I., Irwin, M. R., & Lieberman, M. D. (2008). Craving love? Enduring grief activates brain reward center. NeuroImage, 42(2), 969–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.256
-
Kissane, D. W., McKenzie, M., McKenzie, D. P., Forbes, D., O’Connor, M., Bloch, S., & Clarke, D. M. (2006). A randomized controlled trial of a group therapy intervention for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: An existential perspective. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(25), 4044–4051. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.6027
(Исследование ключевое для понимания meaning-centered group therapy, широко применяемой в горю.) -
Shear, M. K. (2015). Complicated grief treatment: The theory, practice, and outcomes of a targeted psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 172(12), 1191–1199. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15040567
-
Dyregrov, K. (2008). Grief support for survivors of suicide victims: A systematic review. Crisis, 29(4), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.29.4.202
-
Litz, B. T., Schorr, Y., Delaney, E., Au, T., Papa, A., Fox, A. B., & Prigerson, H. G. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of a therapist assisted online intervention for complicated grief. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 27(6), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21945
-
Zisook, S., & Shear, K. (2009). Grief and bereavement: What psychiatrists need to know. World Psychiatry, 8(2), 67–74. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2691160/
-
Kokou‐Kpolou, C. K., Fernández‐Alcántara, M., & Cénat, J. M. (2020). Prolonged grief disorder in African contexts: A systematic review. International Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12639