Paul Costa Jr. and Robert McCrae represent two of the most influential figures in the history of counseling and personality psychology, whose collaborative research fundamentally transformed our understanding of personality structure and development across the lifespan. Their groundbreaking work on the Five-Factor Model of personality has become one of the most widely accepted and empirically supported frameworks in personality psychology, with profound implications for counseling psychology practice, assessment, and intervention. Costa and McCrae’s extensive longitudinal research demonstrated the stability of personality traits in adulthood while revealing important patterns of personality development and change. Their development of the NEO Personality Inventory and its revisions provided practitioners with reliable and valid instruments for assessing the five major dimensions of personality: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. The theoretical and empirical contributions of Costa and McCrae have shaped contemporary approaches to personality assessment in counseling, informed evidence-based interventions, and influenced how mental health professionals understand individual differences in client presentation and treatment response. Their work continues to influence research and practice in personality psychology, clinical assessment, and therapeutic intervention, making them central figures in the evolution of modern personality theory and its applications in counseling psychology.
Introduction
The development of personality psychology as a scientific discipline has been marked by the contributions of numerous researchers who have sought to understand the fundamental dimensions of human personality and their implications for psychological functioning. Among these contributors, Paul T. Costa Jr. and Robert R. McCrae stand out as transformative figures whose collaborative work has fundamentally shaped contemporary understanding of personality structure, development, and assessment.
Costa and McCrae’s partnership, which began in the 1970s at the National Institute on Aging, represents one of the most productive and influential collaborations in the history of counseling psychology and personality research. Their work emerged during a period of significant theoretical uncertainty in personality psychology, when the field was grappling with fundamental questions about the structure and stability of personality traits. Through rigorous empirical research and theoretical integration, Costa and McCrae provided answers to these questions that have stood the test of time and continue to influence research and practice today.
The significance of Costa and McCrae’s contributions extends far beyond academic psychology to practical applications in counseling psychology, clinical assessment, organizational psychology, and health psychology. Their Five-Factor Model has become the dominant paradigm for understanding personality structure, while their assessment instruments are widely used in clinical, research, and applied settings worldwide. The model’s emphasis on broad personality dimensions has provided a common language for personality research and has facilitated communication across different theoretical orientations and applied domains.
Their longitudinal research on personality development has challenged earlier assumptions about personality change in adulthood and has provided important insights into the stability and malleability of personality traits across the lifespan. This work has particular relevance for counseling psychology, as it informs understanding of how personality factors influence therapeutic processes and outcomes, and how interventions might be tailored to individual personality characteristics.
The Costa-McCrae collaboration also exemplifies the importance of sustained, systematic research programs in advancing scientific understanding. Their work demonstrates how careful attention to measurement, longitudinal methodology, and cross-cultural validation can lead to robust theoretical frameworks that withstand empirical scrutiny and have lasting impact on the field.
Biographical Backgrounds and Career Development
Paul T. Costa Jr.: Early Life and Education
Paul Thomas Costa Jr. was born on September 16, 1942, representing a generation of researchers who would come to define modern personality psychology. His educational journey began at Fairfield University, where he completed his undergraduate studies in psychology, developing an early interest in individual differences and psychological assessment that would define his career. Costa’s undergraduate experience provided him with a solid foundation in psychological research methods and statistical analysis, skills that would prove crucial in his later collaborative work.
Costa pursued his graduate education at the University of Chicago, one of the premier institutions for psychological research. At Chicago, he was exposed to rigorous research methodologies and the importance of empirical validation in psychological theory. His doctoral training emphasized the scientific approach to personality psychology, preparing him for a career focused on systematic research rather than purely theoretical speculation.
Following his doctoral training, Costa joined the research staff at the National Institute on Aging (NIA), a position that would prove pivotal in his career development. The NIA provided an ideal environment for longitudinal research on personality and aging, offering access to extensive datasets and the resources necessary for long-term studies. This institutional support would prove crucial for the comprehensive research programs that Costa and McCrae would later develop together.
Costa’s early research interests focused on personality and aging, particularly the question of whether personality traits remain stable or change across the adult lifespan. This research focus was both theoretically important and practically relevant, as it addressed fundamental questions about human development and had implications for clinical practice and intervention.
Robert R. McCrae: Academic Foundation and Research Development
Robert Richard McCrae was born on April 28, 1949, bringing a slightly different generational perspective to his collaborative work with Costa. McCrae’s educational background provided him with complementary skills and interests that would enhance their partnership. His undergraduate education emphasized psychological research and statistical methodology, preparing him for a career in empirical personality research.
McCrae pursued graduate studies with a focus on personality psychology and individual differences, developing expertise in psychometric methods and factor analysis that would prove essential in his later work on personality structure. His graduate training emphasized the importance of rigorous measurement and statistical analysis in personality research, skills that would be crucial in developing and validating personality assessment instruments.
Like Costa, McCrae joined the research staff at the National Institute on Aging, where he would begin his collaborative relationship with Costa. The NIA environment provided both researchers with access to extensive longitudinal datasets and the institutional support necessary for conducting large-scale personality research. This shared institutional context facilitated their collaboration and provided the resources necessary for their groundbreaking research.
McCrae’s early research interests complemented Costa’s focus on personality and aging, with particular attention to the measurement and structure of personality traits. His expertise in factor analysis and psychometric theory would prove crucial in developing the empirical foundation for the Five-Factor Model and creating reliable and valid assessment instruments.
The Costa-McCrae Collaboration: Formation and Development
The collaboration between Costa and McCrae began in the late 1970s at the National Institute on Aging, where both were working on questions related to personality and aging. Their partnership was facilitated by complementary skills, shared research interests, and a common commitment to rigorous empirical research. Costa brought expertise in longitudinal research and aging processes, while McCrae contributed specialized knowledge of factor analysis and psychometric theory.
Their early collaborative work focused on examining the structure and stability of personality traits in adulthood, using data from longitudinal studies of aging. This research addressed fundamental questions about personality development that had significant implications for both theoretical understanding and practical applications in counseling and clinical psychology.
The productivity of their collaboration was evident from the beginning, with numerous joint publications that advanced understanding of personality structure and development. Their ability to combine theoretical insight with methodological rigor resulted in research that was both scientifically sound and practically relevant.
The longevity and productivity of the Costa-McCrae partnership is remarkable in academic psychology, where collaborations often prove difficult to maintain over extended periods. Their successful collaboration can be attributed to complementary skills, shared values regarding scientific rigor, and a commitment to systematic, long-term research programs that required sustained effort over many years.
The Five-Factor Model: Development and Theoretical Framework
Historical Context and Theoretical Foundations
The development of the Five-Factor Model occurred within a specific historical context in personality psychology, during a period when the field was experiencing what some called a “crisis of confidence” regarding the existence and measurement of personality traits. The person-situation debate of the 1960s and 1970s had challenged traditional trait theories, with critics arguing that behavior was primarily determined by situational factors rather than stable personality characteristics.
Costa and McCrae’s work emerged as a response to these challenges, providing empirical evidence for the existence of stable personality traits while acknowledging the importance of situational influences. Their approach was distinctly empirical, using factor analysis and longitudinal research to identify the fundamental dimensions of personality rather than relying on theoretical speculation.
The Five-Factor Model builds upon earlier work in personality psychology, particularly the lexical tradition that examines personality-descriptive language to identify fundamental personality dimensions. Researchers such as Gordon Allport and Raymond Cattell had earlier used lexical approaches to identify personality factors, but Costa and McCrae’s work provided a more systematic and comprehensive analysis of personality structure.
Their model also incorporated insights from other personality theories, including Hans Eysenck’s three-factor model and the work of Warren Norman and Lewis Goldberg on the “Big Five” personality factors. However, Costa and McCrae’s contribution was distinctive in its systematic development, empirical validation, and practical application through assessment instruments.
The Five Factors: Conceptual Framework and Measurement
The Five-Factor Model proposes that personality can be comprehensively described using five broad dimensions: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. Each factor represents a continuum along which individuals vary, and each encompasses multiple specific personality traits or facets.
Neuroticism represents the tendency to experience negative emotions such as anxiety, depression, anger, and vulnerability. Individuals high in Neuroticism are prone to psychological distress, unrealistic ideas, excessive cravings, and maladaptive coping responses. This dimension has particular relevance for counseling psychology, as it relates to vulnerability to various forms of psychopathology and difficulties in emotional regulation.
Extraversion encompasses traits related to social interaction, assertiveness, and positive emotionality. Extraverts are characterized by sociability, activity, assertiveness, and positive emotions, while introverts tend to be more reserved, independent, and less socially oriented. This dimension has important implications for therapeutic relationships and intervention approaches.
Openness to Experience reflects individual differences in cognitive style, intellectual curiosity, and aesthetic sensitivity. Individuals high in Openness are characterized by active imagination, aesthetic sensitivity, attentiveness to inner feelings, preference for variety, and intellectual curiosity. This dimension relates to creativity, cognitive flexibility, and receptivity to new ideas and experiences.
Agreeableness represents individual differences in cooperation, trust, and concern for others. Agreeable individuals are characterized by altruism, trust, modesty, and tender-mindedness, while those low in Agreeableness tend to be more competitive, skeptical, and self-interested. This dimension has important implications for interpersonal relationships and social functioning.
Conscientiousness reflects individual differences in organization, persistence, and motivation in goal-directed behavior. Conscientious individuals are characterized by competence, order, dutifulness, achievement striving, self-discipline, and deliberation. This dimension relates to academic and occupational success, health behaviors, and treatment compliance.
Hierarchical Structure and Facet-Level Analysis
One of the important contributions of Costa and McCrae’s work is the development of a hierarchical model that includes both broad factors and specific facets within each factor. Each of the five factors is composed of six facets that provide more specific information about personality characteristics.
The facet-level analysis allows for more nuanced personality assessment and has important implications for counseling practice. While the broad factors provide a general framework for understanding personality, the facets offer specific information that can inform intervention strategies and treatment planning. For example, two individuals might score similarly on overall Neuroticism but differ significantly on specific facets such as anxiety versus depression.
This hierarchical approach has been validated through extensive factor analytic research and has proven useful in various applied contexts. The ability to assess personality at both broad and specific levels provides flexibility in assessment and enhances the practical utility of the model for counseling and clinical applications.
The facet structure also facilitates research on personality development and change, as changes may occur at the facet level even when broad factor scores remain stable. This has important implications for understanding therapeutic change and the mechanisms through which interventions might influence personality-related outcomes.
Research Contributions and Empirical Findings
Longitudinal Studies of Personality Stability and Change
One of Costa and McCrae’s most significant contributions to personality psychology is their extensive longitudinal research on personality stability and change across the adult lifespan. Their research has challenged earlier assumptions about personality development and provided important insights into the nature of personality continuity and change.
The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging provided a crucial dataset for examining personality stability over extended periods. Costa and McCrae’s analysis of this data revealed remarkable stability in personality traits across adult years, with correlation coefficients typically ranging from .60 to .80 across intervals of up to 30 years. This research provided strong evidence for the stability of personality traits in adulthood, countering earlier assumptions about significant personality change throughout the lifespan.
However, their research also revealed important patterns of personality development and change. They identified systematic age-related changes in personality, with Neuroticism and Extraversion generally declining with age, while Agreeableness and Conscientiousness tend to increase. These findings have important implications for understanding adult development and for clinical practice with clients of different ages.
Their longitudinal research has also examined the relationship between personality and various life outcomes, including health, relationships, and occupational success. This research has demonstrated the predictive validity of personality traits and their importance for understanding individual differences in life outcomes.
The methodology of their longitudinal research has been exemplary, with careful attention to issues such as selective attrition, cohort effects, and measurement invariance across time. Their approaches to longitudinal research have influenced methodology in personality psychology and provided models for other researchers conducting long-term studies.
Cross-Cultural Validation and Universality
Costa and McCrae’s work has been notable for its attention to cross-cultural validation and the universality of personality structure. They have collaborated with researchers around the world to examine the Five-Factor Model across different cultures, languages, and societies.
Their cross-cultural research has generally supported the universality of the Five-Factor Model, with similar factor structures emerging across diverse cultures. This research has included studies in Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas, using both translated versions of their instruments and indigenous personality measures.
The cross-cultural validation of the Five-Factor Model has important implications for counseling psychology, particularly in multicultural societies where practitioners work with clients from diverse cultural backgrounds. The universality of basic personality dimensions provides a common framework for understanding individual differences across cultures, while also highlighting the importance of cultural factors in personality expression and development.
However, their cross-cultural research has also revealed important cultural differences in personality trait levels and their behavioral expressions. While the basic structure appears universal, the mean levels of traits and their relationships to behaviors and outcomes can vary significantly across cultures.
Personality and Health Relationships
Costa and McCrae’s research has made important contributions to understanding relationships between personality and health outcomes. Their work has examined how personality traits relate to physical health, mental health, and health-related behaviors across the lifespan.
Their research on Neuroticism has been particularly influential in health psychology, demonstrating relationships between this trait and various health outcomes including cardiovascular disease, immune system functioning, and subjective well-being. This research has important implications for understanding individual differences in vulnerability to stress and illness.
Their work on Conscientiousness has revealed important relationships between this trait and health behaviors such as exercise, diet, medication compliance, and substance use. Conscientious individuals tend to engage in more health-promoting behaviors and avoid health-damaging behaviors, leading to better health outcomes over time.
The research on personality and health has important implications for counseling psychology, particularly in health psychology applications and in understanding how personality factors influence treatment compliance and therapeutic outcomes.
Assessment Instruments and Practical Applications
Development of the NEO Inventories
One of Costa and McCrae’s most practical contributions to psychology is their development of assessment instruments for measuring the Five-Factor Model. The NEO Personality Inventory and its revisions (NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI) have become among the most widely used personality assessment instruments in research and applied settings.
The development of these instruments involved extensive psychometric research to ensure reliability, validity, and practical utility. The instruments provide assessment of both the five major factors and their constituent facets, allowing for comprehensive personality assessment at multiple levels of specificity.
The NEO inventories have been translated into numerous languages and validated across diverse populations, making them valuable tools for cross-cultural research and practice. The availability of normative data from various populations enhances their utility for clinical and counseling applications.
The instruments are designed for use in various settings, including clinical practice, research, organizational applications, and educational contexts. Their versatility and strong psychometric properties have made them standard tools in personality assessment and research.
Clinical and Counseling Applications
The Five-Factor Model and NEO inventories have found extensive application in clinical and counseling psychology. Personality assessment using these instruments can inform case conceptualization, treatment planning, and intervention strategies.
Understanding a client’s personality profile can help counselors anticipate potential therapeutic challenges and identify appropriate intervention approaches. For example, clients high in Neuroticism may require additional attention to emotional regulation strategies, while those low in Openness might benefit from more structured, concrete therapeutic approaches.
The instruments can also be used to assess therapeutic change and monitor progress in counseling. While personality traits are generally stable, therapeutic interventions may produce changes in specific facets or in the behavioral expression of personality traits.
Research has examined relationships between personality factors and various aspects of therapeutic process and outcome, including therapeutic alliance, treatment compliance, and response to different types of interventions. This research informs evidence-based practice and helps match clients with appropriate treatment approaches.
Organizational and Applied Psychology Applications
Beyond clinical applications, the Five-Factor Model and NEO inventories have found extensive use in organizational and applied psychology settings. The model provides a comprehensive framework for understanding individual differences in work-related behaviors and outcomes.
Research has demonstrated relationships between personality factors and job performance, with Conscientiousness being a particularly strong predictor across various occupational categories. This research has informed selection procedures, performance management, and career development practices.
The instruments have also been used in leadership development, team building, and organizational development applications. Understanding personality differences among team members can improve communication, reduce conflict, and enhance team effectiveness.
Career counseling applications have utilized the Five-Factor Model to help individuals understand their personality characteristics and make informed career choices. The model provides a framework for understanding person-environment fit and career satisfaction.
Theoretical Impact and Contemporary Relevance
Influence on Personality Theory
The work of Costa and McCrae has fundamentally transformed personality psychology, establishing the Five-Factor Model as the dominant paradigm for understanding personality structure. Their empirical approach to personality research has influenced how personality psychologists conduct research and develop theories.
The Five-Factor Model has provided a common language for personality research, facilitating communication across different theoretical orientations and research programs. This common framework has enabled cumulative progress in personality research and has facilitated meta-analytic studies that synthesize findings across multiple studies.
Their work has also influenced other areas of psychology, including social psychology, developmental psychology, and clinical psychology. The Five-Factor Model has been incorporated into various psychological theories and has informed research on topics such as psychopathology, social relationships, and life outcomes.
The emphasis on empirical validation and cross-cultural replication in their work has set standards for personality research and has influenced how other researchers approach personality assessment and theory development.
Contemporary Developments and Extensions
While Costa and McCrae’s original formulation of the Five-Factor Model remains influential, contemporary researchers have extended and refined their work in various ways. Some researchers have proposed additional personality factors or alternative models, while others have focused on the mechanisms underlying personality development and change.
Research on personality development has expanded beyond their original focus on stability to examine processes of personality change and the factors that influence development across the lifespan. This research has important implications for understanding how therapeutic interventions might influence personality-related outcomes.
Contemporary research has also examined the biological and genetic bases of personality traits, building on Costa and McCrae’s descriptive model to understand the mechanisms underlying individual differences in personality.
The integration of personality psychology with other areas such as neuroscience, genetics, and positive psychology has created new opportunities for extending the Five-Factor Model and understanding its implications for human functioning and well-being.
Criticisms and Limitations
Despite its widespread acceptance, the Five-Factor Model has faced various criticisms and challenges that are important to acknowledge. Some critics have argued that five factors are insufficient to capture the full complexity of personality, proposing alternative models with additional factors.
Others have questioned the universality of the model, arguing that cultural factors may be more important than Costa and McCrae’s research suggests. While cross-cultural research has generally supported the model’s universality, some studies have found cultural variations that challenge universal claims.
The emphasis on broad personality factors has been criticized by some researchers who argue for greater attention to specific traits and situational factors. The debate between broad versus narrow personality traits continues to be an active area of research and theoretical discussion.
Some critics have also questioned the practical utility of personality assessment, arguing that personality traits may not be sufficiently predictive of behavior to warrant their use in applied settings. However, extensive research has demonstrated the predictive validity of personality traits across various outcomes and contexts.
Legacy and Future Directions
Continuing Research Programs
The research programs initiated by Costa and McCrae continue to be active areas of investigation, with researchers around the world building on their foundational work. Longitudinal studies of personality development continue to examine questions about stability and change across the lifespan.
Cross-cultural research continues to examine the universality of personality structure while also investigating cultural variations in personality expression and development. This research is particularly important in our increasingly globalized world where counselors work with clients from diverse cultural backgrounds.
Research on personality and health continues to examine the mechanisms through which personality influences health outcomes and the implications for health promotion and disease prevention. This research has important applications for health psychology and behavioral medicine.
Studies of personality and psychopathology continue to examine relationships between normal personality variation and various forms of mental illness, with implications for understanding vulnerability, resilience, and treatment response.
Implications for Training and Practice
The work of Costa and McCrae has important implications for training in counseling psychology and clinical practice. Understanding personality structure and its measurement is important for effective assessment and intervention.
Training programs increasingly include content on personality assessment and the Five-Factor Model, recognizing their importance for clinical practice. However, training must also address the limitations of personality assessment and the importance of integrating personality information with other clinical data.
Continuing education for practicing counselors should include updates on personality research and its implications for practice. The field continues to evolve, and practitioners need to stay current with new developments and research findings.
Ethical considerations in personality assessment are important for training and practice, including issues such as informed consent, confidentiality, and appropriate use of assessment results. Training programs must address these ethical considerations and help practitioners develop competence in ethical personality assessment.
Conclusion
Paul Costa Jr. and Robert McCrae have made transformative contributions to personality psychology that continue to influence research, theory, and practice decades after their initial collaboration began. Their development of the Five-Factor Model and the NEO assessment instruments has provided psychology with one of its most robust and widely applicable theoretical frameworks, while their longitudinal research on personality stability and change has fundamentally shaped understanding of adult development.
The significance of their contributions extends well beyond academic psychology to practical applications in counseling psychology, clinical practice, organizational settings, and health psychology. Their work has provided practitioners with reliable tools for personality assessment and has informed evidence-based approaches to intervention and treatment planning. The Five-Factor Model has become a common language for understanding individual differences and has facilitated communication across different theoretical orientations and applied domains.
Their commitment to rigorous empirical research, cross-cultural validation, and practical application has set standards for personality research that continue to influence how researchers approach personality assessment and theory development. Their collaborative model demonstrates the power of sustained research partnerships and the importance of complementary expertise in advancing scientific understanding.
The contemporary relevance of their work is evidenced by its continued influence on research and practice, even as the field has evolved to address new questions and challenges. While their model faces criticisms and limitations, it remains the dominant paradigm for understanding personality structure and continues to generate productive research programs around the world.
Looking toward the future, the legacy of Costa and McCrae will likely continue to influence personality psychology through the ongoing research programs their work has inspired, the assessment instruments they developed, and the theoretical framework they established. Their contributions represent a lasting achievement in psychological science that has improved understanding of human personality and enhanced the effectiveness of psychological practice.
The work of Costa and McCrae exemplifies the best traditions of psychological science, combining theoretical insight with empirical rigor and practical application. Their contributions have not only advanced scientific understanding but have also provided tools and frameworks that continue to benefit practitioners and clients in counseling psychology and related fields. As the field continues to evolve, their foundational contributions will remain central to understanding personality and its role in human experience and psychological intervention.
References
- Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. https://www.parinc.com/Products/Pkey/313
- Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. https://www.parinc.com/Products/Pkey/279
- Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1994). Set like plaster? Evidence for the stability of adult personality. In T. F. Heatherton & J. L. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 21-40). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10143-002
- Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2006). Age changes in personality and their origins: Comment on Roberts, Walton, and Viechtbauer (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 26-28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.26
- Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Handbook-of-Personality/Pervin-John/9781593856502
- McCrae, R. R. (2001). Trait psychology and culture: Exploring intercultural comparisons. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 819-846. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696166
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509-516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Personality-in-Adulthood/McCrae-Costa/9781593859978
- McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hřebíčková, M., Avia, M. D., Sanz, J., Sánchez-Bernardos, M. L., Kusdil, M. E., Woodfield, R., Saunders, P. R., & Smith, P. B. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.173
- McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547-561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
- Piedmont, R. L. (1998). The revised NEO Personality Inventory: Clinical and research applications. Plenum Press. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4899-3588-5
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
- Widiger, T. A., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (Eds.). (2013). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (3rd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13939-000