School counseling represents a specialized domain within counseling psychology focused on promoting the academic, career, and social-emotional development of students from kindergarten through grade 12. This comprehensive article examines the historical evolution of school counseling from vocational guidance in the early 20th century to contemporary comprehensive school counseling programs guided by the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) National Model. The profession has transformed significantly, expanding beyond traditional administrative and clerical duties to embrace a proactive, data-driven approach centered on student outcomes. Contemporary school counselors implement evidence-based interventions addressing academic achievement, college and career readiness, and mental health concerns while advocating for educational equity and social justice. This article explores theoretical foundations including developmental, systems, and social justice frameworks that inform practice. Critical examination of school counselor roles, ethical considerations, multicultural competencies, and empirical research demonstrating program effectiveness provides readers with an authoritative overview of this essential educational specialization. Future directions address emerging challenges including mental health crises, technology integration, and the ongoing need for comprehensive program implementation across diverse educational settings.
Introduction
School counseling constitutes a vital specialization within the broader field of counseling psychology, dedicated to supporting students’ holistic development within educational environments. The profession emerged in the early 20th century as vocational guidance and has evolved into a comprehensive, developmental approach addressing students’ academic, career, and personal-social needs (Gysbers & Henderson, 2012). School counselors serve as essential mental health professionals within schools, implementing programs and interventions designed to remove barriers to learning and promote student success for all learners (American School Counselor Association, 2019).
The contemporary practice of school counseling is distinguished by its unique setting within educational institutions and its focus on prevention, early intervention, and developmental guidance rather than long-term psychotherapy. School counselors work with students individually and in groups, consult with teachers and families, and contribute to school-wide initiatives that foster positive learning environments (Dahir & Stone, 2012). The recommended student-to-counselor ratio of 250:1, established by the American School Counselor Association (ASCA), reflects the broad scope of responsibilities these professionals undertake, though actual ratios often exceed this recommendation in many districts (ASCA, 2019).
This article provides a comprehensive examination of school counseling as both a profession and a field of practice. It traces historical developments that shaped current models, explores theoretical frameworks guiding intervention selection, analyzes the multifaceted roles school counselors fulfill, addresses ethical and multicultural considerations, reviews empirical evidence supporting program effectiveness, and considers future directions for the field. Understanding school counseling requires appreciation of its educational context, developmental focus, and commitment to serving diverse student populations within increasingly complex social and institutional environments.
Historical Development of School Counseling
The origins of school counseling trace to the vocational guidance movement of the early 1900s, when societal concerns about industrialization, urbanization, and immigration prompted efforts to help young people transition effectively into the workforce. Jesse B. Davis, appointed as a school counselor in Detroit in 1898, is often credited as the first person to occupy such a position, though his duties centered primarily on vocational planning (Schmidt, 2014). Frank Parsons, frequently called the “father of guidance,” established the Vocational Bureau in Boston in 1908 and articulated a systematic approach to occupational choice based on matching individual characteristics with job requirements (Parsons, 1909). Parsons’ trait-and-factor theory profoundly influenced the early conceptualization of guidance work in schools.
The formalization of school counseling as a distinct profession accelerated during the mid-20th century, driven by federal legislation and evolving societal needs. The National Defense Education Act (NDEA) of 1958, enacted in response to the Soviet Union’s launch of Sputnik, provided substantial funding for training school counselors to identify and nurture talented students in mathematics and science (Baker & Gerler, 2008). This legislation resulted in a dramatic increase in the number of school counselors nationwide, though it also reinforced a narrow focus on college-bound students and academic tracking that would later face criticism. The 1960s and 1970s witnessed expanded attention to students’ personal and social development, influenced by humanistic psychology and the work of theorists such as Carl Rogers, whose person-centered approach emphasized the counseling relationship and individual potential (Rogers, 1961).
The evolution from position-focused guidance to comprehensive, program-focused school counseling represents a paradigm shift that emerged prominently in the 1980s and 1990s. Norman Gysbers and colleagues developed comprehensive guidance program models emphasizing that all students should receive developmental guidance services, not merely those in crisis or those planning for college (Gysbers & Henderson, 2012). The American School Counselor Association’s publication of the National Standards for School Counseling Programs in 1997 and the subsequent ASCA National Model in 2003 (revised in 2005, 2012, and 2019) provided a framework emphasizing data-driven practice, accountability, and alignment with educational reform initiatives (ASCA, 2019). These developments reflected growing recognition that school counselors should function as integral members of the educational team, implementing programs that demonstrably contribute to student achievement and institutional goals. Contemporary school counseling continues to evolve in response to emerging challenges including mental health crises, educational equity concerns, and technological transformations affecting both students and educational systems.
Theoretical Foundations of School Counseling
School counseling practice draws upon multiple theoretical frameworks that inform assessment, intervention selection, and program design. Developmental theories provide foundational understanding of students’ evolving cognitive, social, emotional, and moral capacities across the kindergarten through grade 12 continuum. Erikson’s (1968) psychosocial development theory, which identifies stage-specific crises and tasks, helps counselors understand age-appropriate concerns and design interventions matched to developmental needs. Similarly, Piaget’s cognitive developmental theory and Kohlberg’s stages of moral development offer insights into students’ reasoning capabilities and ethical understanding at different ages (Woolfolk, 2019). Contemporary developmental science, including research on adolescent brain development and identity formation, continues to refine school counselors’ understanding of student capacities and vulnerabilities across developmental periods.
Systems theory constitutes another essential theoretical foundation, recognizing that students function within nested ecological contexts including families, peer groups, schools, communities, and broader cultural systems. Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) ecological systems theory identifies multiple environmental levels – microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem – that interact to influence development. School counselors applying systems perspectives consider how family dynamics, school climate, community resources, cultural values, and historical contexts affect student functioning and design interventions addressing multiple system levels (Ratts et al., 2007). Systems thinking also informs consultation and collaboration approaches, recognizing that sustainable change often requires engaging multiple stakeholders and addressing organizational factors rather than focusing exclusively on individual student characteristics.
Social justice and advocacy frameworks have emerged as increasingly central theoretical orientations guiding contemporary school counseling practice. These frameworks recognize that educational inequities reflect broader societal patterns of discrimination and marginalization based on race, ethnicity, social class, gender, sexual orientation, disability status, and other identities (Ratts et al., 2015). The multicultural and social justice counseling competencies developed by Ratts et al. (2016) articulate counselor responsibilities at individual, institutional, and societal levels to identify and challenge systemic barriers to student success. Counselors adopting social justice orientations examine how school policies, practices, and resource distributions perpetuate achievement gaps and work to transform institutional structures rather than solely helping students adapt to inequitable systems (Singh et al., 2010). Additionally, cognitive-behavioral theories, solution-focused brief counseling, and other contemporary approaches provide specific intervention strategies for addressing academic, behavioral, and mental health concerns within time-limited school contexts. The integration of multiple theoretical frameworks enables school counselors to develop comprehensive, contextually responsive approaches addressing the complex factors influencing student development and achievement.
Roles and Functions of School Counselors
School counselors fulfill diverse roles designed to support student success across academic, career, and social-emotional domains. The ASCA National Model (2019) identifies four primary components that structure comprehensive school counseling programs: foundation, management, delivery, and accountability. Within the delivery component, school counselors engage in direct and indirect services to students. Direct student services include individual counseling, group counseling, and classroom guidance lessons (often called core curriculum lessons) that reach all students with developmental programming on topics such as study skills, conflict resolution, bullying prevention, and career exploration (Young & Kaffenberger, 2015). Individual counseling in schools typically focuses on brief, solution-oriented interventions addressing immediate concerns rather than long-term therapy, with counselors making appropriate referrals to community mental health providers when students require more intensive services. Group counseling allows efficient service delivery to multiple students experiencing similar concerns, such as divorce adjustment, grief, social skills development, or academic motivation, while also providing peer support and normalization.
Indirect student services encompass consultation, collaboration, and referral activities that support students through work with others in their systems. School counselors regularly consult with teachers regarding classroom management strategies, differentiated instruction approaches, and individual student needs (Dougherty, 2013). Collaboration with families helps ensure alignment between home and school and provides caregivers with resources and strategies to support their children’s development. School counselors also coordinate services with administrators, school psychologists, social workers, nurses, and community agencies to ensure comprehensive support for students with complex needs. Data-driven decision making represents an essential function, with counselors collecting and analyzing information on student outcomes, achievement gaps, and program effectiveness to guide continuous improvement efforts (Dimmitt et al., 2007). Use-of-time assessments help ensure that counselors devote appropriate proportions of their work to direct and indirect services rather than non-counseling administrative tasks, which should comprise no more than 10-15% of counselor time according to ASCA recommendations.
School counselors also serve as systemic change agents and student advocates, working to transform institutional practices that create barriers to success for marginalized populations. This advocacy function involves examining discipline data to identify disproportionate outcomes for students of color, challenging tracking systems that limit opportunities, promoting rigorous curriculum access for all students, and addressing bullying and harassment (Holcomb-McCoy, 2007). Leadership roles position school counselors as influential members of school improvement teams, data analysis committees, and crisis response teams. Professional school counselors recognize that their effectiveness depends not only on their direct work with students but also on their ability to influence school policies, practices, and climates that affect all learners. Balancing these multiple roles requires ongoing professional judgment, time management, and advocacy for appropriate role definition, as school counselors in many settings face pressure to assume non-counseling duties such as testing coordination, discipline administration, and substitute teaching that detract from their primary professional responsibilities.
Ethical and Legal Considerations in School Counseling
School counselors navigate complex ethical and legal terrain that requires balancing multiple obligations to students, families, schools, and society. The ASCA Ethical Standards for School Counselors (2022) provides professional guidelines addressing responsibilities to students, parents and guardians, colleagues and professional associates, school and community, self, and the profession. Central ethical principles include beneficence (promoting student welfare), nonmaleficence (avoiding harm), autonomy (respecting student self-determination), justice (ensuring fairness), and fidelity (maintaining trustworthy professional relationships) (Stone & Dahir, 2016). School counselors face distinctive ethical challenges arising from their work with minors in educational institutions, including issues related to confidentiality, informed consent, dual relationships, and conflicts between student and institutional interests.
Confidentiality represents one of the most challenging ethical considerations in school counseling, as counselors must balance their commitment to protecting student privacy with legal and ethical exceptions to confidentiality. School counselors inform students about the nature and limits of confidentiality, explaining that information will be shared when students pose danger to themselves or others, disclose abuse or neglect, or when counselors are legally compelled to testify (Remley & Herlihy, 2020). However, determining the appropriate course of action in ambiguous situations requires careful professional judgment. For instance, when a student discloses substance use, counselors must assess whether the situation constitutes an immediate safety concern requiring parental notification or whether maintaining confidentiality to preserve the therapeutic relationship better serves the student’s interests. School counselors also consider developmental factors in assessing students’ capacity to make informed decisions about disclosure and must be knowledgeable about state laws governing minor consent rights, which vary considerably across jurisdictions regarding mental health treatment, substance abuse counseling, and reproductive health services.
Legal considerations significantly shape school counseling practice, with counselors needing knowledge of federal and state statutes affecting educational and mental health services. The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) governs educational records and grants parents rights to access most school documents, though sole-possession counseling notes maintained for counselor’s personal use and not shared with others may receive limited protection (U.S. Department of Education, 2021). Federal laws including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and Title IX prohibiting sex discrimination create obligations for school counselors regarding identification of students needing accommodations, participation in special education processes, and response to sexual harassment (Stone & Dahir, 2016). Mandated reporting laws in all states require school counselors, as designated professionals, to report suspected child abuse and neglect to appropriate authorities, with penalties for failure to report. School counselors must also be aware of their responsibilities and limitations regarding suicide assessment and intervention, ensuring they follow district protocols while providing appropriate support and referral. Technology use introduces additional ethical and legal considerations, including maintaining confidentiality in electronic communications, using social media appropriately, and ensuring compliance with student privacy protections in digital environments. Ongoing professional development, consultation with colleagues, and familiarity with relevant laws and ethical codes help school counselors navigate these complex issues while maintaining their primary commitment to student welfare.
Multicultural and Diversity Competencies in School Counseling
Multicultural competence represents an essential professional competency for school counselors serving increasingly diverse student populations in U.S. schools. The National Center for Education Statistics reported that in fall 2020, students of color comprised 55% of public school enrollment, with Hispanic students representing the fastest-growing demographic group (NCES, 2022). Additionally, schools serve students with diverse religious backgrounds, socioeconomic statuses, family structures, gender identities, sexual orientations, ability levels, and linguistic backgrounds. Effective school counselors recognize that culture profoundly influences students’ values, communication styles, help-seeking behaviors, family dynamics, and educational aspirations, and they develop awareness, knowledge, and skills to work effectively across differences (Sue et al., 1992).
The multicultural counseling competencies originally articulated by Sue et al. (1992) provide a foundational framework identifying three dimensions: counselor awareness of own cultural values and biases, knowledge of client worldviews, and culturally appropriate intervention strategies. School counselors engaging in cultural self-awareness examine their own cultural identities, including privileged and marginalized aspects, and consider how their backgrounds influence their perceptions of students and families. This reflexive process helps counselors recognize assumptions they may hold about educational achievement, family involvement, authority relationships, emotional expression, and appropriate behavior that may not align with students’ cultural values (Holcomb-McCoy, 2007). Knowledge development involves learning about the cultural backgrounds, historical experiences, and within-group diversity of student populations served, including understanding how racism, discrimination, and oppression affect educational access and outcomes for marginalized groups. School counselors also develop skills in culturally responsive assessment, intervention, and advocacy, recognizing that standardized approaches may not be equally effective across cultural groups.
Contemporary frameworks extend beyond traditional multicultural competencies to emphasize social justice advocacy and systemic change. The Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies developed by Ratts et al. (2016) articulate counselor responsibilities at four levels: counselor self-awareness, client worldview, counseling relationship, and counseling and advocacy interventions. This framework recognizes that effective multicultural practice requires not only understanding individual cultural differences but also addressing institutional policies and practices that perpetuate educational inequities. School counselors applying social justice approaches examine school data to identify achievement and opportunity gaps affecting specific student populations, such as disproportionate representation in special education, advanced courses, discipline referrals, and college enrollment (Holcomb-McCoy, 2007). They work to expand access to rigorous curriculum, challenge deficit-based narratives about marginalized students, and create inclusive school climates that affirm diverse identities. Collaboration with families requires cultural humility and recognition that diverse family structures and values represent sources of strength rather than barriers to overcome. School counselors also recognize intersectionality, understanding that students hold multiple identities that interact to shape their experiences in complex ways that cannot be reduced to single demographic categories (Singh et al., 2010). Developing and maintaining multicultural and social justice competencies requires ongoing professional development, consultation, self-reflection, and commitment to equity as a core professional value.
Evidence Base and Research in School Counseling
Empirical research documenting school counseling program effectiveness has expanded considerably over recent decades, though methodological challenges persist in establishing causal relationships between counseling interventions and student outcomes. A growing body of evidence supports the positive impact of comprehensive school counseling programs on academic achievement, attendance, behavior, and college and career readiness. Carey et al. (2012) conducted a study of 117 high schools in Utah implementing the ASCA National Model and found that schools with more fully implemented programs demonstrated better student achievement outcomes, particularly for low-income students. Similarly, Lapan et al. (2012) examined school counseling programs in Missouri and found that students in schools with more fully implemented programs reported feeling safer, experienced better relationships with teachers, earned higher grades, and had more positive perceptions of their education. These large-scale studies provide evidence that comprehensive, data-driven school counseling programs contribute meaningfully to student success.
Research on specific school counseling interventions demonstrates effectiveness across various domains. A meta-analysis by Whiston et al. (2011) examining school counseling outcome research published between 1988 and 2007 found that school counseling interventions produced positive effects on student outcomes, with psychoeducational interventions (such as classroom guidance) and counseling interventions (individual and group counseling) both demonstrating effectiveness. Group counseling interventions have received substantial empirical support for addressing concerns including social skills deficits, anxiety, grief and loss, children of divorce, and academic underachievement. For example, Steen and Kaffenberger (2007) found that a solution-focused group counseling intervention significantly improved academic achievement for underperforming elementary students. School-based mental health interventions delivered by school counselors have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing internalizing and externalizing symptoms, though effect sizes vary based on intervention type, student characteristics, and implementation fidelity (Zyromski et al., 2018).
College and career readiness represents another area with growing empirical support. School counseling programs emphasizing early college awareness, financial aid information, application support, and college-going culture development have demonstrated positive effects on postsecondary enrollment, particularly for first-generation and low-income students. For instance, Pham and Keenan (2011) found that students in schools with lower student-to-counselor ratios were more likely to attend four-year colleges. Research on specific college access interventions, such as the College Advising Corps and similar programs supplementing school counselors, has shown increased college enrollment and persistence rates for participating students (Bettinger & Baker, 2014). Despite this accumulating evidence base, school counseling research faces methodological limitations including reliance on correlational designs, self-report outcome measures, lack of random assignment, and limited long-term follow-up data. Future research would benefit from more rigorous experimental and quasi-experimental designs, standardized outcome measurement across studies, examination of implementation factors affecting effectiveness, and investigation of mechanisms explaining how school counseling programs produce beneficial outcomes. Additionally, research is needed examining culturally responsive approaches, technology-mediated interventions, and school counseling’s role in addressing contemporary challenges such as mental health crises and educational inequities. Continued development of the evidence base will strengthen the profession’s accountability and support advocacy for adequate staffing and resources.
Conclusion
School counseling has evolved from narrow vocational guidance origins into a comprehensive profession addressing students’ multifaceted developmental needs within educational contexts. Contemporary school counseling, as articulated in the ASCA National Model, emphasizes evidence-based practice, data-driven decision making, and systematic program implementation designed to promote academic achievement, college and career readiness, and social-emotional development for all students. School counselors serve as essential educational professionals implementing direct services including individual counseling, group counseling, and developmental curriculum, while also engaging in indirect services through consultation, collaboration, and systemic advocacy. The profession draws upon multiple theoretical frameworks including developmental, systems, and social justice perspectives that inform responsive, contextually appropriate intervention selection.
Effective school counseling practice requires sophisticated navigation of ethical and legal complexities, particularly regarding confidentiality, informed consent, and mandated reporting responsibilities. Multicultural and social justice competencies represent core professional requirements given the diverse populations school counselors serve and persistent educational inequities affecting marginalized students. School counselors must continuously examine their own cultural assumptions, develop knowledge of diverse student worldviews, and implement culturally responsive practices while advocating for systemic change to address institutional barriers to student success. Growing empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of comprehensive school counseling programs in promoting positive student outcomes, though continued research with rigorous methodological designs is needed to strengthen the evidence base and identify optimal implementation approaches.
Looking toward the future, school counseling faces both challenges and opportunities requiring professional adaptation and advocacy. The youth mental health crisis, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has intensified demands on school counselors to provide crisis intervention, suicide prevention, and mental health support while maintaining focus on academic and career development programming. Technology presents both opportunities for innovative service delivery and challenges related to cyberbullying, social media impacts on adolescent wellbeing, and maintaining confidentiality in digital environments. Persistent achievement and opportunity gaps demand continued commitment to educational equity and social justice advocacy, with school counselors playing essential roles in identifying and dismantling systemic barriers. Advocacy for appropriate student-to-counselor ratios, comprehensive program implementation, and protection of school counselor time for direct and indirect student services remains critical for enabling the profession to fulfill its potential. As educational systems continue evolving, school counseling must maintain its commitment to serving all students while demonstrating accountability through data-driven practice and contributing to the empirical foundation supporting this vital specialization within counseling psychology.
References
American School Counselor Association. (2019). ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (4th ed.). Author.
American School Counselor Association. (2022). ASCA ethical standards for school counselors. Author.
Baker, S. B., & Gerler, E. R. (2008). School counseling for the twenty-first century (5th ed.). Pearson.
Bettinger, E. P., & Baker, R. B. (2014). The effects of student coaching: An evaluation of a randomized experiment in student advising. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713500523
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Carey, J. C., Harrington, K. M., Martin, I. K., & Hoffman, D. (2012). A statewide evaluation of the outcomes of the implementation of ASCA National Model school counseling programs in Utah high schools. Professional School Counseling, 16(2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X1201600202
Dahir, C. A., & Stone, C. B. (2012). The transformed school counselor (2nd ed.). Brooks/Cole.
Dimmitt, C., Carey, J. C., & Hatch, T. (2007). Evidence-based school counseling: Making a difference with data-driven practices. Corwin Press.
Dougherty, A. M. (2013). Psychological consultation and collaboration in school and community settings (6th ed.). Brooks/Cole.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton.
Gysbers, N. C., & Henderson, P. (2012). Developing and managing your school guidance and counseling program (5th ed.). American Counseling Association.
Holcomb-McCoy, C. (2007). School counseling to close the achievement gap: A social justice framework for success. Corwin Press.
Lapan, R. T., Whitcomb, S. A., & Aleman, N. M. (2012). Connecticut professional school counselors: College and career counseling services and smaller ratios benefit students. Professional School Counseling, 16(2), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X1201600205
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Racial/ethnic enrollment in public schools. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cge
Parsons, F. (1909). Choosing a vocation. Houghton Mifflin.
Pham, C., & Keenan, T. (2011). Counseling and college matriculation: Does the availability of counseling affect college-going decisions among highly qualified first-generation college-bound high school graduates? Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 1(1), 12-24.
Ratts, M. J., DeKruyf, L., & Chen-Hayes, S. F. (2007). The ACA advocacy competencies: A social justice advocacy framework for professional school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 11(2), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0701100203
Ratts, M. J., Singh, A. A., Nassar-McMillan, S., Butler, S. K., & McCullough, J. R. (2015). Multicultural and social justice counseling competencies. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 44(1), 28-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12035
Ratts, M. J., Singh, A. A., Nassar-McMillan, S., Butler, S. K., & McCullough, J. R. (2016). Multicultural and social justice counseling competencies: Guidelines for the counseling profession. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 44(1), 28-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12035
Remley, T. P., & Herlihy, B. (2020). Ethical, legal, and professional issues in counseling (6th ed.). Pearson.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Schmidt, J. J. (2014). Counseling in schools: Comprehensive programs of responsive services for all students (6th ed.). Pearson.
Singh, A. A., Urbano, A., Haston, M., & McMahan, E. (2010). School counselors’ strategies for social justice change: A grounded theory of what works in the real world. Professional School Counseling, 13(3), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X1001300301
Steen, S., & Kaffenberger, C. J. (2007). Integrating academic interventions into small group counseling in elementary school. Professional School Counseling, 10(5), 516-519. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0701000513
Stone, C. B., & Dahir, C. A. (2016). The transformed school counselor (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
Sue, D. W., Arredondo, P., & McDavis, R. J. (1992). Multicultural counseling competencies and standards: A call to the profession. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70(4), 477-486. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb01642.x
U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html
Whiston, S. C., Tai, W. L., Rahardja, D., & Eder, K. (2011). School counseling outcome: A meta-analytic examination of interventions. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00059.x
Woolfolk, A. (2019). Educational psychology (14th ed.). Pearson.
Young, A., & Kaffenberger, C. (2015). School counseling professional development: Assessing the use of data to inform school counseling services. Professional School Counseling, 19(1), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.5330/1096-2409-19.1.46
Zyromski, B., Dimmitt, C., Mariani, M., & Griffith, C. (2018). Evidence-based school counseling: Models for integrated practice and school-community partnerships. Professional School Counseling, 21(1b), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X18761897