psychology.iresearchnet.com

iResearchNet

Psychology » Counseling Psychology » Trauma Counseling

Trauma Counseling

Trauma counseling represents a specialized area within mental health practice focused on helping individuals process and recover from traumatic experiences. This therapeutic approach integrates evidence-based interventions designed to address the psychological, emotional, and physiological consequences of trauma exposure. Trauma counseling emerged as a distinct field following increased recognition of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and related trauma spectrum disorders in the late 20th century. Contemporary trauma counseling encompasses various theoretical frameworks, including cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, and somatic approaches, each offering unique pathways toward healing and recovery. Practitioners in this field work with diverse populations affected by single-incident traumas, complex developmental trauma, and collective traumatic events. The effectiveness of trauma counseling has been demonstrated through extensive research, with studies indicating significant symptom reduction and improved functioning across multiple outcome measures. This article examines the historical development, theoretical foundations, assessment procedures, evidence-based interventions, special populations, ethical considerations, and future directions of trauma counseling as both a clinical specialty and area of scholarly inquiry within counseling psychology.

Introduction

Trauma counseling has evolved into a critical specialty area within the broader field of counseling psychology, responding to the pervasive impact of traumatic experiences on individual and collective well-being. The recognition that psychological trauma requires specialized intervention approaches distinct from general counseling practice emerged gradually throughout the 20th century, accelerating significantly following the inclusion of post-traumatic stress disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, third edition (DSM-III) in 1980 (American Psychiatric Association, 1980). This formal diagnostic recognition validated decades of clinical observation regarding the profound and enduring effects of traumatic experiences on human functioning.

The scope of trauma counseling extends beyond addressing symptoms of PTSD to encompass a comprehensive understanding of how traumatic experiences affect cognitive processing, emotional regulation, interpersonal relationships, and neurobiological functioning. Research indicates that approximately 70% of adults in the United States have experienced at least one traumatic event in their lifetime, with 20% of these individuals developing PTSD (Kilpatrick et al., 2013). These prevalence rates underscore the critical importance of trauma counseling services within mental health care systems. Contemporary trauma counseling integrates knowledge from neuroscience, attachment theory, cognitive psychology, and social justice frameworks to provide culturally responsive and scientifically grounded interventions.

Trauma counselors work across diverse settings, including community mental health centers, hospitals, schools, military installations, and private practice environments. The field has expanded to address various forms of trauma, including acute single-incident traumas such as accidents or assaults, chronic interpersonal trauma, developmental trauma resulting from childhood adversity, and collective trauma affecting entire communities. This article provides a comprehensive examination of trauma counseling, exploring its historical foundations, theoretical underpinnings, assessment methodologies, intervention strategies, applications with special populations, ethical considerations, and emerging directions for research and practice.

Historical Development and Conceptual Foundations

The conceptualization of psychological trauma and the development of specialized counseling approaches have roots extending back to the late 19th century. Pierre Janet’s work with hysteria patients in the 1880s and 1890s identified dissociation as a response to overwhelming psychological experiences, establishing early connections between traumatic events and mental health symptoms (van der Kolk et al., 1996). Sigmund Freud’s initial recognition of childhood trauma’s role in psychological disturbance, though later modified in favor of fantasy theory, contributed to early discourse about trauma’s psychological impact. However, systematic attention to trauma counseling remained limited until the 20th century brought increased awareness through military conflicts and social movements.

World War I introduced the concept of “shell shock,” followed by “combat fatigue” in World War II, forcing medical and psychological professionals to confront trauma’s effects on soldiers. These military experiences generated important clinical observations, though comprehensive treatment frameworks remained underdeveloped. The Vietnam War era proved pivotal, as returning veterans’ struggles catalyzed advocacy efforts that ultimately led to PTSD’s inclusion in DSM-III (Scott, 1990). Simultaneously, the feminist movement of the 1970s brought attention to domestic violence, sexual assault, and childhood sexual abuse, expanding trauma discourse beyond combat experiences. Judith Herman’s seminal work, “Trauma and Recovery” (1992), synthesized clinical understanding across various trauma types and proposed a staged approach to trauma treatment that continues to influence contemporary practice.

The late 20th and early 21st centuries witnessed exponential growth in trauma-related research, particularly regarding neurobiological mechanisms underlying traumatic stress responses. Advances in neuroimaging technology revealed how trauma affects brain structure and function, particularly in the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex (Bremner, 2006). These findings validated clinical observations about trauma’s pervasive effects and informed the development of interventions targeting both psychological and physiological dimensions of trauma. The concept of complex PTSD, proposed by Herman (1992) and later included in the International Classification of Diseases, 11th edition (ICD-11), recognized that prolonged, repeated trauma produces distinct symptom profiles requiring adapted treatment approaches. Contemporary trauma counseling now rests on a robust foundation integrating psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, humanistic, and neuroscience perspectives, creating a multifaceted framework for understanding and treating traumatic stress.

Theoretical Frameworks in Trauma Counseling

Trauma counseling draws upon multiple theoretical frameworks, each contributing distinct perspectives on trauma’s nature, impact, and treatment. Cognitive-behavioral theories emphasize how traumatic experiences disrupt normal information processing, creating distorted cognitions and maladaptive behavioral patterns (Foa & Rothbaum, 1998). According to cognitive models, trauma overwhelms individuals’ existing schemas about safety, trust, and predictability, leading to fragmented trauma memories that fail to integrate into coherent autobiographical narratives. These fragmented memories remain highly accessible and easily triggered, producing intrusive symptoms characteristic of PTSD. Cognitive-behavioral approaches to trauma counseling focus on helping clients process traumatic memories, modify distorted cognitions, and develop adaptive coping strategies.

Psychodynamic frameworks, building on early psychoanalytic theory, view trauma as overwhelming the ego’s defensive capacities, leading to dissociation and splitting as protective mechanisms. Contemporary psychodynamic trauma counseling emphasizes the therapeutic relationship as a corrective emotional experience, allowing clients to explore trauma-related material within a safe, containing environment (Pearlman & Courtois, 2005). Attachment theory, closely related to psychodynamic perspectives, highlights how early relational trauma disrupts the development of secure attachment patterns, affecting emotional regulation capabilities and interpersonal functioning throughout life. Trauma counseling informed by attachment theory prioritizes establishing therapeutic safety and attunement, gradually building clients’ capacity for affect regulation and interpersonal trust.

Somatic and body-oriented approaches recognize that trauma is stored not only in cognitive and emotional memory systems but also in bodily sensations and physiological activation patterns. Peter Levine’s Somatic Experiencing (Levine, 1997) and Bessel van der Kolk’s work on the body’s role in trauma (van der Kolk, 2014) emphasize how trauma counseling must address physiological dysregulation alongside psychological symptoms. These approaches incorporate body awareness, movement, and regulation of autonomic nervous system activation into the therapeutic process. Polyvagal theory, developed by Stephen Porges (2011), provides a neurobiological framework explaining how trauma affects the autonomic nervous system’s capacity for social engagement and self-regulation. This theoretical integration of psychological and physiological perspectives has significantly enriched trauma counseling practice, leading to interventions that target multiple dimensions of traumatic stress simultaneously.

Assessment and Diagnosis in Trauma Counseling

Comprehensive assessment constitutes a critical foundation for effective trauma counseling, requiring careful evaluation of trauma history, current symptoms, functional impairment, and contextual factors. Trauma assessment presents unique challenges, as discussing traumatic experiences may trigger intense emotional and physiological responses, potentially re-traumatizing clients if conducted insensitively. Skilled trauma counselors establish safety and trust before detailed trauma exploration, often beginning with broad screening questions before proceeding to specific trauma inquiry (Briere & Scott, 2015). Initial assessment typically includes gathering information about the nature, timing, frequency, and duration of traumatic experiences, while remaining attentive to signs of dissociation or overwhelming distress that may necessitate slowing the assessment process.

Standardized assessment instruments provide valuable quantitative data regarding trauma exposure and symptomatology. The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) represents the gold standard structured interview for PTSD diagnosis, offering detailed assessment of symptom frequency and intensity across all diagnostic criteria (Weathers et al., 2018). Self-report measures, including the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), provide efficient screening tools suitable for repeated administration to monitor treatment progress. The Trauma Symptom Inventory-2 (TSI-2) offers comprehensive assessment of trauma-related symptoms beyond PTSD criteria, including dissociation, dysfunctional sexual behavior, and impaired self-reference (Briere, 2011). For childhood trauma assessment, the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) questionnaire provides standardized evaluation of developmental trauma exposure, with higher ACE scores predicting increased risk for physical and mental health problems across the lifespan.

Assessment in trauma counseling must also evaluate comorbid conditions, as trauma survivors frequently present with depression, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, and personality disorders. Differential diagnosis requires distinguishing PTSD from other conditions producing similar symptoms, such as panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, or major depressive disorder. Complex PTSD assessment requires evaluating disturbances in self-organization, including difficulties with emotion regulation, negative self-concept, and interpersonal problems, in addition to core PTSD symptoms (Cloitre et al., 2013). Cultural considerations significantly influence trauma assessment, as cultural background affects both trauma exposure patterns and symptom expression. Trauma counselors must employ culturally adapted assessment approaches, recognizing that Western diagnostic frameworks may inadequately capture trauma presentations in diverse cultural contexts. Ongoing assessment throughout treatment allows counselors to track symptom changes, identify emerging issues, and adjust interventions to optimize treatment outcomes.

Evidence-Based Interventions in Trauma Counseling

Contemporary trauma counseling employs numerous evidence-based interventions demonstrating significant efficacy in reducing trauma-related symptoms and improving overall functioning. Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) represents one of the most extensively researched approaches, combining cognitive restructuring, exposure techniques, and skills training to address PTSD symptoms (Cohen et al., 2006). TF-CBT typically involves psychoeducation about trauma and its effects, relaxation and affect regulation skills, cognitive processing of trauma-related thoughts, trauma narrative development, and in vivo exposure to trauma reminders. Research consistently demonstrates TF-CBT’s effectiveness across diverse trauma types and populations, with meta-analyses indicating large effect sizes for PTSD symptom reduction.

Prolonged exposure (PE) therapy, developed by Edna Foa, specifically targets avoidance behaviors and trauma-related fear through systematic, repeated exposure to trauma memories and reminders. PE involves imaginal exposure, wherein clients repeatedly recount traumatic experiences in detail while processing associated emotions, and in vivo exposure to safe situations avoided due to trauma associations (Foa et al., 2007). Although initially developed for adult PTSD, PE has been successfully adapted for adolescents and various trauma types. Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) emphasizes identifying and modifying problematic trauma-related cognitions, particularly those affecting beliefs about safety, trust, power, esteem, and intimacy (Resick et al., 2016). CPT can be delivered with or without written trauma accounts, making it adaptable to different client needs and preferences.

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) represents a distinctive approach integrating elements of exposure, cognitive restructuring, and bilateral stimulation through eye movements or other dual attention tasks. EMDR’s eight-phase protocol guides clients through preparation, assessment, desensitization, installation of positive cognitions, body scan, closure, and reevaluation (Shapiro, 2018). Despite initial controversy regarding its mechanisms, extensive research supports EMDR’s efficacy for PTSD treatment, with outcomes comparable to other evidence-based approaches. Several meta-analyses confirm EMDR’s effectiveness, leading to its recognition as a first-line PTSD treatment by international clinical guidelines. Emerging interventions include written exposure therapy, a brief protocol involving repeated written accounts of traumatic experiences, and skills training in affective and interpersonal regulation (STAIR), which addresses emotion regulation and interpersonal difficulties before trauma processing. These diverse evidence-based approaches allow trauma counselors to select and adapt interventions based on individual client characteristics, preferences, and treatment responses.

Special Populations and Contextual Applications

Trauma counseling with children and adolescents requires developmentally appropriate adaptations recognizing that traumatic stress affects developing brains, attachment systems, and emerging identity formation. Children exposed to trauma, particularly chronic interpersonal trauma, show increased risk for developmental delays, academic difficulties, behavioral problems, and relationship disturbances (Cook et al., 2005). Trauma counseling for young people typically involves caregivers in treatment, addressing not only the child’s symptoms but also family system dynamics and parenting practices that support recovery. Play therapy, art therapy, and other expressive modalities allow children to process traumatic experiences through developmentally congruent mediums. Attachment-based interventions, such as child-parent psychotherapy, focus on repairing caregiver-child relationships disrupted by trauma, recognizing that secure attachment relationships provide essential contexts for healing.

Military veterans and active-duty service members represent another population requiring specialized trauma counseling approaches. Combat-related trauma often involves repeated exposure to life-threatening situations, moral injury resulting from actions conflicting with personal values, and loss of fellow service members (Litz et al., 2009). Military culture’s emphasis on strength and self-reliance may create barriers to seeking mental health services, necessitating culturally informed engagement strategies. Veterans Affairs healthcare systems have implemented evidence-based PTSD treatments widely, contributing substantially to the trauma counseling research base. Interventions addressing moral injury, an increasingly recognized aspect of combat trauma, incorporate elements of acceptance, self-forgiveness, and meaning-making alongside traditional trauma processing.

Refugees and asylum seekers who have experienced political violence, war, torture, or persecution present unique trauma counseling needs intersecting with acculturation stress, language barriers, and ongoing uncertainty regarding immigration status. Trauma counseling with refugee populations requires cultural humility, awareness of cultural concepts of distress, and integration of interpreters when necessary. Community-based participatory approaches that engage cultural brokers and address social determinants of health alongside individual trauma symptoms have shown promise. Sexual assault survivors constitute another population requiring specialized trauma counseling approaches sensitive to the particular psychological impacts of sexual violence, including shame, self-blame, and interpersonal trust violations (Rothbaum et al., 2012). Trauma-informed sexual assault services integrate advocacy, medical care, and mental health support, recognizing that coordinated multidisciplinary responses optimize recovery outcomes. First responders, healthcare workers, and other professionals with occupational trauma exposure increasingly receive specialized trauma counseling services addressing cumulative stress, vicarious traumatization, and moral distress resulting from their work.

Ethical Considerations and Professional Practice Standards

Ethical practice in trauma counseling demands heightened attention to informed consent, boundaries, competence, and cultural responsiveness. Trauma survivors may have experienced violations of autonomy and trust, making transparent communication about treatment processes, potential risks and benefits, and client rights particularly important. Informed consent in trauma counseling should address the possibility that trauma processing may temporarily increase distress, the availability of crisis support between sessions, and clients’ rights to control the pace and focus of treatment (Courtois & Gold, 2009). Trauma counselors must maintain clear professional boundaries while providing the warmth and attunement necessary for therapeutic alliance development, navigating this balance thoughtfully given that boundary violations by helping professionals constitute a form of institutional betrayal particularly harmful to trauma survivors.

Competence in trauma counseling requires specialized training beyond general counseling preparation, including knowledge of trauma’s neurobiological effects, evidence-based trauma interventions, and trauma-informed care principles. The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS) provides practice guidelines outlining recommended competencies for trauma treatment providers. Many professional organizations now offer specialized certification in trauma treatment, recognizing the need for advanced training in this area. Trauma counselors must also attend to their own vicarious traumatization and secondary traumatic stress, implementing regular self-care practices and seeking supervision or consultation when needed. Organizational factors, including adequate supervision, manageable caseloads, and workplace cultures supporting provider wellbeing, significantly affect trauma counselors’ capacity to provide sustained, high-quality care.

Cultural and social justice considerations permeate ethical trauma counseling practice, as trauma exposure and mental health service access are profoundly influenced by systemic oppression, discrimination, and marginalization. Trauma counselors must recognize how racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, and other forms of oppression function as ongoing traumatic stressors for affected populations (Bryant-Davis & Ocampo, 2005). Culturally responsive trauma counseling requires awareness of one’s own cultural values and biases, knowledge of clients’ cultural backgrounds and experiences, and skills in adapting interventions to align with clients’ worldviews and preferences. Ethical trauma counseling also involves advocacy for systemic changes addressing root causes of trauma exposure, including poverty, violence, discrimination, and lack of access to resources. This social justice orientation recognizes that individual trauma counseling, while necessary, must be complemented by efforts to create safer, more equitable communities and societies.

Future Directions and Emerging Trends

The field of trauma counseling continues evolving rapidly, with several emerging trends shaping future research and practice directions. Technology-assisted interventions, including smartphone applications for symptom monitoring and skills practice, virtual reality exposure therapy, and internet-delivered treatment protocols, expand access to trauma counseling services while offering innovative therapeutic tools (Reger et al., 2019). Preliminary research suggests that virtual reality exposure therapy may enhance engagement and effectiveness for some trauma populations, particularly military veterans. Teletherapy platforms have expanded dramatically, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, with research increasingly supporting the feasibility and effectiveness of remotely delivered trauma counseling. These technological advances hold promise for reducing geographic and logistical barriers to accessing specialized trauma services.

Personalized medicine approaches seek to identify which treatments work best for which individuals based on biological, psychological, and social characteristics. Emerging research examines genetic markers, neuroimaging findings, and other biomarkers that may predict treatment response, potentially allowing trauma counselors to select optimal interventions for individual clients (McLaughlin et al., 2015). Integration of trauma counseling with complementary approaches, including yoga, mindfulness meditation, equine-assisted therapy, and neurofeedback, reflects growing recognition of trauma’s multidimensional nature requiring comprehensive intervention strategies. While evidence bases for some complementary approaches remain limited, ongoing research investigates their potential as adjuncts to established treatments.

Increased attention to prevention and early intervention represents another important direction, with programs targeting at-risk populations before chronic trauma-related difficulties develop. Psychological first aid protocols provide structured early interventions following acute traumas, aiming to promote natural recovery processes and identify individuals requiring more intensive services. Trauma-informed organizational practices extend trauma counseling principles beyond clinical settings into schools, child welfare systems, justice systems, and medical care, creating environments that recognize trauma’s prevalence and avoid re-traumatization. Research examining resilience factors and post-traumatic growth highlights not only trauma’s harmful effects but also possibilities for positive transformation following adversity (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004). This expanded focus on growth alongside symptom reduction enriches trauma counseling’s scope and goals. As neuroscience continues illuminating trauma’s biological mechanisms, novel interventions targeting specific neural circuits and neurotransmitter systems may emerge, further expanding the trauma counseling toolkit.

Conclusion

Trauma counseling has emerged as an essential specialty within counseling psychology, grounded in decades of clinical observation, empirical research, and theoretical development. This comprehensive examination has traced trauma counseling’s historical evolution from early recognition of psychological trauma’s effects through contemporary integration of neuroscience, evidence-based practice, and cultural responsiveness. The field now offers multiple effective intervention approaches targeting trauma’s cognitive, emotional, physiological, and interpersonal dimensions, allowing practitioners to tailor treatments to individual client needs and characteristics. Research consistently demonstrates that trauma counseling produces meaningful symptom reduction and functional improvement across diverse populations and trauma types.

The practice of trauma counseling requires specialized competencies, ethical vigilance, and ongoing professional development, reflecting trauma’s complexity and the vulnerability of affected populations. Effective trauma counseling balances attention to evidence-based techniques with recognition of each client’s unique history, strengths, cultural background, and recovery goals. As understanding of trauma’s mechanisms and consequences continues advancing, trauma counseling approaches will undoubtedly evolve, incorporating new technologies, refining existing interventions, and expanding attention to prevention and resilience. The field’s future directions promise enhanced accessibility, personalization, and effectiveness of trauma counseling services.

Ultimately, trauma counseling represents both a clinical specialty and a commitment to addressing one of humanity’s most significant sources of suffering and impairment. By helping individuals process traumatic experiences, regulate overwhelming emotions, and rebuild lives disrupted by trauma, trauma counselors facilitate profound healing and transformation. The continued growth and refinement of trauma counseling practices, supported by rigorous research and guided by ethical principles, offers hope for the millions of individuals worldwide affected by traumatic experiences. As the field moves forward, maintaining focus on evidence-based practice, cultural humility, and social justice will ensure trauma counseling continues meeting the diverse needs of trauma-affected populations with compassion, competence, and effectiveness.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Author.
  2. Bremner, J. D. (2006). Traumatic stress: Effects on the brain. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 8(4), 445-461. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2006.8.4/jbremner
  3. Briere, J. (2011). Trauma Symptom Inventory-2 (TSI-2). Psychological Assessment Resources. https://www.parinc.com/Products/Pkey/479
  4. Briere, J., & Scott, C. (2015). Principles of trauma therapy: A guide to symptoms, evaluation, and treatment (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/principles-of-trauma-therapy/book237813
  5. Bryant-Davis, T., & Ocampo, C. (2005). Racist incident-based trauma. The Counseling Psychologist, 33(4), 479-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005276465
  6. Cloitre, M., Garvert, D. W., Brewin, C. R., Bryant, R. A., & Maercker, A. (2013). Evidence for proposed ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD: A latent profile analysis. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4(1), 20706. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.20706
  7. Cohen, J. A., Mannarino, A. P., & Deblinger, E. (2006). Treating trauma and traumatic grief in children and adolescents. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Treating-Trauma-and-Traumatic-Grief-in-Children-and-Adolescents/Cohen-Mannarino-Deblinger/9781593853082
  8. Cook, A., Spinazzola, J., Ford, J., Lanktree, C., Blaustein, M., Cloitre, M., DeRosa, R., Hubbard, R., Kagan, R., Liautaud, J., Mallah, K., Olafson, E., & van der Kolk, B. (2005). Complex trauma in children and adolescents. Psychiatric Annals, 35(5), 390-398. https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20050501-05
  9. Courtois, C. A., & Gold, S. N. (2009). The need for inclusion of psychological trauma in the professional curriculum: A call to action. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015224
  10. Foa, E. B., Hembree, E. A., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2007). Prolonged exposure therapy for PTSD: Emotional processing of traumatic experiences. Oxford University Press. https://www.oup.com/academic/product/prolonged-exposure-therapy-for-ptsd-9780195308501
  11. Foa, E. B., & Rothbaum, B. O. (1998). Treating the trauma of rape: Cognitive-behavioral therapy for PTSD. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Treating-the-Trauma-of-Rape/Foa-Rothbaum/9781572303850
  12. Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books. https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/judith-lewis-herman-md/trauma-and-recovery/9780465061716/
  13. Kilpatrick, D. G., Resnick, H. S., Milanak, M. E., Miller, M. W., Keyes, K. M., & Friedman, M. J. (2013). National estimates of exposure to traumatic events and PTSD prevalence using DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26(5), 537-547. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21848
  14. Levine, P. A. (1997). Waking the tiger: Healing trauma. North Atlantic Books. https://www.northatlanticbooks.com/shop/waking-the-tiger/
  15. Litz, B. T., Stein, N., Delaney, E., Lebowitz, L., Nash, W. P., Silva, C., & Maguen, S. (2009). Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(8), 695-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.07.003
  16. McLaughlin, K. A., Koenen, K. C., Bromet, E. J., Karam, E. G., Liu, H., Petukhova, M., Ruscio, A. M., Sampson, N. A., Stein, D. J., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Borges, G., Demyttenaere, K., Dinolova, R. V., Ferry, F., Florescu, S., de Girolamo, G., Gureje, O., Kawakami, N., … Kessler, R. C. (2015). Posttraumatic stress disorder in the World Mental Health Surveys. Psychological Medicine, 45(13), 2797-2808. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291715000902
  17. Pearlman, L. A., & Courtois, C. A. (2005). Clinical applications of the attachment framework: Relational treatment of complex trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18(5), 449-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20052
  18. Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. W. W. Norton & Company. https://wwnorton.com/books/9780393707007
  19. Reger, G. M., Smolenski, D., Norr, A., Katz, A., Buck, B., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2019). Does virtual reality increase emotional engagement during exposure for PTSD? Subjective distress during prolonged and virtual reality exposure therapy. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 61, 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.06.001
  20. Resick, P. A., Monson, C. M., & Chard, K. M. (2016). Cognitive processing therapy for PTSD: A comprehensive manual. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Cognitive-Processing-Therapy-for-PTSD/Resick-Monson-Chard/9781462528646
  21. Rothbaum, B. O., Foa, E. B., & Hembree, E. A. (2012). Reclaiming your life from a traumatic experience: A prolonged exposure treatment program. Therapist Guide. Oxford University Press. https://www.oup.com/academic/product/reclaiming-your-life-from-a-traumatic-experience-a-prolonged-exposure-treatment-program-9780199334964
  22. Scott, W. J. (1990). PTSD in DSM-III: A case in the politics of diagnosis and disease. Social Problems, 37(3), 294-310. https://doi.org/10.2307/800744
  23. Shapiro, F. (2018). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Eye-Movement-Desensitization-and-Reprocessing-Therapy/Francine-Shapiro/9781462532766
  24. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
  25. van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/223186/the-body-keeps-the-score-by-bessel-van-der-kolk-md/
  26. van der Kolk, B. A., van der Hart, O., & Marmar, C. R. (1996). Dissociation and information processing in posttraumatic stress disorder. In B. A. van der Kolk, A. C. McFarlane, & L. Weisaeth (Eds.), Traumatic stress: The effects of overwhelming experience on mind, body, and society (pp. 303-327). Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Traumatic-Stress/van-der-Kolk-McFarlane-Weisaeth/9781572304574
  27. Weathers, F. W., Bovin, M. J., Lee, D. J., Sloan, D. M., Schnurr, P. P., Kaloupek, D. G., Keane, T. M., & Marx, B. P. (2018). The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation in military veterans. Psychological Assessment, 30(3), 383-395. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000486