Education and Learning

Education and Learning

Conventional beliefs have long held that education and learning are predominantly focused on the early stages of life, aimed at preparing individuals for careers and civic engagement. However, this limited perspective is undergoing a significant transformation due to a relatively recent shift in understanding the dynamics of adulthood and aging. It is now increasingly recognized that continuous education throughout life is not only beneficial for individual growth but also vital for the advancement of societies as a whole.

To begin with, mounting evidence underscores the profound impact of both formal and informal education on lifelong health, overall well-being, and cognitive resilience. Moreover, the capacity to engage in education and embrace learning opportunities persists well into late adulthood. Consequently, the provision of education across all stages of life has emerged as a crucial component of comprehensive public health policies.

Furthermore, fueled partially by medical advancements, our lives are becoming longer. The phenomenon of global population aging is unprecedented, widespread, and anticipated to persist (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2002). By 2050, for the first time in history, the number of individuals over 60 years old is projected to equal the count of those below 15 years old. This demographic shift renders the conventional models of education outdated, where education was front-loaded in youth to prepare for future work and societal responsibilities in adulthood. These models were built on assumptions of shorter lifespans compared to today’s reality. With elongated lifespans, individuals are now engaging in work for extended periods, even as the nature of work and the demanded knowledge and skills evolve rapidly. This shift makes it impractical to educate young individuals for jobs that they will assume 40, 50, or 60 years down the line. Additionally, the customary retirement models, where a large younger workforce supports an extended period of inactivity or leisure for a smaller elderly population, are no longer economically viable. Riley and Riley (2000) aptly labeled these challenges as instances of ‘structural lag,’ where societal roles fail to catch up with the transformative effects of prolonged lifespans. The implication is that age-segregated societal structures need a profound overhaul, making lifelong education accessible and indispensable for optimizing health, well-being, and human capital.

Finally, a considerable portion of individuals, for various reasons, do not fully acquire essential skills such as literacy, numeracy, and reasoning during their early educational experiences (National Research Council, 2012). These individuals often seek adult basic education programs, university disability services, and occupation-oriented training initiatives, frequently driven by an urgent need for education but complicated by the demands of adult life. For this demographic, educational science must provide efficient and effective methods to achieve educational objectives while navigating the constraints of a busy adult existence.

In essence, education is now recognized as an ongoing endeavor spanning an individual’s entire life. This analysis initiates by examining the nature of cognitive development across the lifespan. Subsequently, we delve into the profound influence of education on development, initially exploring how early education shapes lifelong progress and then investigating how ongoing educational pursuits in adulthood can influence development and aging. Ultimately, we revisit the challenge of structural lag by contemplating innovative models of lifelong education that can keep pace with the evolving needs of a lengthened lifespan.

Life Span Cognitive Development

Life span cognitive development has evolved into a well-established field of study (Baltes et al., 1999), bringing to light the realization that development is a continuous process that persists beyond the boundaries of adolescence, extending throughout an individual’s entire life span. This recognition of the extended developmental trajectory serves as a foundational pillar for comprehending the significance of lifelong education.

Within the realm of life span psychology, it is universally acknowledged that the journey of development does not culminate with the advent of adulthood; instead, it traverses an intricate and ongoing path across diverse life stages. This profound understanding lays the groundwork for a more nuanced perspective on the pivotal role that lifelong education assumes.

By embracing the principles underpinning life span psychology, we gain insight into the intricacies of cognitive growth that unfold across various phases of life. This dynamic perspective underscores the need for educational paradigms that adapt and cater to the evolving cognitive needs of individuals as they progress through adulthood and into advanced age. Just as cognitive capacities continue to evolve beyond the traditional markers of youth, education too must evolve to support this lifelong developmental journey.

In essence, life span cognitive development offers a comprehensive lens through which we can perceive the holistic nature of human growth. This perspective, firmly rooted in the principles of life span psychology, serves as a crucial foundation for conceptualizing the imperative role that lifelong education plays in nurturing and harnessing cognitive potential across the myriad stages of life.

Development Is Both Holistic and Multifunctional

Life span psychology makes a pivotal contribution by seamlessly blending two essential perspectives: the person-centered, holistic approach and the function-centered approach. In this harmonious synthesis, development is revealed to be a multifunctional phenomenon, characterized by a rich interplay of processes—ranging from perception and memory to reasoning, regulatory mechanisms, identity, and social strategies. Collectively, these processes shape an individual’s interaction with the world, facilitating adaptation to diverse challenges and circumstances.

At its core, the multifunctional nature of development underscores the intricate web of mechanisms that constitute the human developmental system. These mechanisms collectively define how individuals, operating at the systemic level, perceive and engage with their environment. The intricate interplay of these mechanisms equips individuals with the capacity to not only navigate the world around them but also to evolve and refine their responses as they encounter new experiences and scenarios.

Yet, within this complexity lies a sense of holistic coherence that underscores the person-centered nature of development. Each individual possesses a distinct amalgamation of functions—ranging from cognitive abilities and dispositions to deeply-held values—that collectively form a unique developmental constellation. This constellation unfolds as a unified system, fostering a harmonious progression across different periods and stages of life.

This holistic perspective illuminates the interconnectedness of development, showcasing how the various functions harmonize and interact to shape the individual’s overarching growth trajectory. It underscores the importance of recognizing that as individuals progress through life, the coherence and continuity of their developmental journey are maintained despite the evolution of functions and experiences.

In essence, life span psychology unveils the intricate dance between the multifunctional nature of development and the holistic coherence of the individual’s growth. This comprehensive understanding not only enriches our perception of human development but also provides a profound foundation for appreciating the significance of lifelong education in nurturing the multifaceted functions while preserving the holistic unity that defines each individual’s unique path.

Development Is Multidirectional

Component processes constitute distinct functions that can interact but develop independently as a function of biological, environmental, and cultural resources. The consequence is that development is necessarily multidirectional. Development can be multidirectional in the sense that functional systems show divergent trajectories from one another. For example, sensory and perceptual systems generally show declines with age as a consequence of the biological process of aging, while the capacity for knowledge growth, which thrives on environmental enrichment and cultural context, appears to be fairly well preserved into very late life. Development can also be multidirectional in the sense that processes within functional systems can show divergent trajectories. For example, consider the case of problem solving: biological constraints may place limits on certain facets of cognition involving speeded processing of novel patterns with age, leading to declines in inductive reasoning, while life experience may afford growth in reflective judgment, contributing to expertise in social problem solving.

Among the most salient examples of multidirectionality in adult cognition is the divergent development of fluid and crystallized abilities. Fluid abilities or ‘mental mechanics’, the ability to apprehend and mentally transform novel patterns, are highly vulnerable to age-related biological declines, whereas crystallized abilities, which rest on knowledge and well-learned skills, are relatively resilient. Another example of multidimensional development is in the motivation for learning, which may be driven primarily by the need for information acquisition early in the life span, but by social–emotional concerns later in the life span.

Plasticity Is Present Throughout the Life Span

A fundamental principle underscored by life span psychology is the presence of plasticity across the entire spectrum of human development. Plasticity, representing the inherent capacity for change in response to experiences, persists throughout an individual’s life journey. Distinguished from flexibility, which pertains to an individual’s existing skill repertoire enabling adaptation within a specific range of demands, plasticity signifies the potential for both increased efficiency and the formation of new mental representations (Lovden et al., 2010). In essence, plasticity embodies the prospect of augmenting one’s flexibility.

For instance, consider the acquisition of a second language. The process of learning a new language broadens an individual’s ability to function in diverse situations, thereby enhancing their flexibility. This phenomenon relies on existing plasticity. Research even suggests that being bilingual or multilingual can potentially enrich cognitive functions beyond language, such as cognitive control and vocabulary acquisition in novel languages, potentially amplifying plasticity itself (Bialystok et al., 2010). This interconnectedness between plasticity and flexibility is intricately tied to structural alterations within neural networks, where plasticity involves reshaping these networks, while flexibility entails changes in their activation (Lovden et al., 2010).

Plasticity operates as a nuanced, adaptive mechanism. It’s not a constantly rewiring process but rather a slow, deliberate capacity that adapts a system to new demands. It thrives on a more extended discrepancy between the existing skill set and emerging demands, safeguarding the stability of the system. This equilibrium is established when experiences challenge the system within an optimal range, as highlighted by concepts like Vygotsky’s “zone of proximal development” and Metcalfe’s “region of proximal learning” (Metcalfe and Kornell, 2005).

While plasticity is intrinsic to human nature, its manifestation varies widely among individuals. Some individuals require extended exposure to heightened demands in order to foster an increased adaptive capacity. Over the life span, plasticity tends to decrease, primarily due to age-related limitations on neurogenesis, leading to a gradual decline in plasticity. Nevertheless, it’s important to acknowledge that individual variability in plasticity remains a constant throughout the journey of life.

In essence, life span psychology highlights the enduring presence of plasticity—an ever-evolving capacity for change and growth that transcends the boundaries of age. This understanding offers profound insights into the intricate balance between plasticity and flexibility, shedding light on the mechanisms that underlie human development and adaptability.

Implications for Education

The intersection of education and life span development yields profound implications. This intricate relationship manifests in two crucial aspects: comprehending the role of education in driving development and devising instructional strategies that effectively cater to individuals across various life stages. The acknowledgment of multidimensionality and plasticity underscores the increasing divergence among adults, emphasizing the need for educational methods capable of accommodating this diversity. In the subsequent sections, we delve into an exploration of the enduring impacts of early life education and subsequently delve into how education can wield influence over adult development.

At its core, a life span perspective on education necessitates an understanding of how education becomes an active agent in the developmental journey. The impact of education extends beyond its immediate outcomes, shaping the trajectory of individual growth. Recognizing this, it becomes imperative to decipher how educational experiences early in life exert a lifelong influence on cognitive, emotional, and social domains. Such insight aids in the formulation of comprehensive educational strategies that account for the long-term consequences of early education.

In parallel, a critical endeavor involves crafting instructional programs that cater to the diverse and evolving needs of individuals throughout their lifespan. The multidimensional and plastic nature of development results in adults possessing a range of unique characteristics, which calls for educational approaches that can seamlessly adapt to this heterogeneity. An equitable and effective education system acknowledges and embraces the varying cognitive capacities and life experiences present among adult learners.

Delving deeper, we begin by examining the lasting ramifications of education received during the initial stages of life. This exploration delves into the ripple effects of early education on lifelong development, encompassing cognitive growth, emotional resilience, and social integration. Subsequently, we pivot to the intricate landscape of adulthood and how education continues to mold and guide development in these later stages. The nuanced interplay between education and the multifaceted dimensions of adult life underscores the profound role education plays in nurturing ongoing growth.

In essence, a holistic perspective on education and life span development underscores the reciprocal relationship between the two domains. Education not only shapes development but is also shaped by the evolving needs of individuals at different life stages. By embracing this symbiotic relationship, educational systems can be tailored to enhance not only immediate learning outcomes but also to empower individuals to embark on continuous journeys of growth and adaptation throughout their lives.

The Effects of Early Education on Life Span Development

The enduring impact of early education on life span development is a multifaceted phenomenon encompassing a range of advantages. Beyond the evident acquisition of skills and regulatory competencies that foster employability and social mobility, early education instills dispositional attributes that fuel plasticity, fostering an ease with novelty and a commitment to engaging in enriching endeavors. In recent years, a significant body of research has delved into a less apparent yet pivotal dimension: the far-reaching effects of education on brain health and cognitive vitality throughout the course of life.

Historically, the correlations among educational attainment, psychometric intelligence, and socioeconomic status (SES) or income have been well-established. These connections are intricate, influenced by a multitude of factors. While the interaction between intelligence and education is complex, the selection of individuals into educational settings based on demonstrated intellectual capabilities obscures the direct influence of education on intelligence. However, insights gleaned from “natural experiments”—unforeseen circumstances such as geographical or historical occurrences that impact educational opportunities independently of intellectual potential—have contributed to our understanding. Notably, Ceci and Williams (1997) concluded from such natural experiments that education plays a direct role in intellectual growth. This viewpoint, though not devoid of controversy, counters arguments asserting the immutability of intelligence and positing that education primarily functions as a filter for those with innate intellectual capacity (Herrnstein and Murray, 1994). Increasingly, evidence is emerging to emphasize the plasticity of intelligence and the pivotal role that education assumes in fostering this malleability. A contemporary instance of a natural experiment akin to those described by Ceci and Williams emerges from Brinch and Galloway’s (2012) investigation into the effects of school reform in Norway. Their study revealed that an extension of compulsory education positively correlated with increased IQ scores in adolescence.

In essence, the effects of early education ripple across the expanse of life span development. This impact extends beyond surface-level skills, influencing an individual’s disposition towards novelty and personal growth. Moreover, the intricate relationship between education and intelligence, long debated, is steadily revealing a more nuanced dynamic that highlights the potential for educational experiences to contribute to intellectual plasticity. As we continue to unravel the intricate threads connecting education, cognition, and lifelong growth, we gain a more comprehensive understanding of the profound and enduring effects of education received early in life.

The availability of expansive longitudinal datasets that encompass measures of childhood or young adult intellectual functioning, educational achievements, as well as occupational and health records (e.g., Scottish Mental Survey, Lothian and British Cohort Studies, Project Talent) has ushered in a burgeoning field of inquiry known as ‘cognitive epidemiology’. This novel domain focuses on investigating the longitudinal associations of intelligence early in life. An especially noteworthy finding, consistently replicated, is the capacity of intelligence to predict health outcomes and even mortality in adulthood (Deary, 2012). This intriguing phenomenon warrants further examination.

The utilization of such extensive longitudinal datasets also enables the deployment of advanced statistical techniques to unravel the mechanisms underpinning differential development. This includes the exploration of mediational models, such as evidence from the British Cohort Study revealing that the relationship between childhood IQ and socioeconomic status (SES) is mediated by educational investment (Deary, 2012). However, it is crucial to acknowledge that questions concerning the impact of educational engagement on intellectual growth, health, and SES inherently rely on correlational data. Even with meticulous structural equation modeling, the goal remains to ascertain whether the data align with causal explanations, thereby fueling spirited debates on this subject (e.g., Deary and Johnson, 2010, 2011; Richards and Sacker, 2011).

The observed increase in intelligence test scores across successive generations (Schaie and Zanjani, 2006) likely results from various factors, including improved health conditions (e.g., sanitation, medical advancements), alongside enhanced access to education for later cohorts. The plausibility of education playing a pivotal role in this rise of intelligence across cohorts gains support when analyzing divergence in specific abilities. While primary mental abilities like verbal comprehension and inductive reasoning have demonstrated consistent increases, numerical skills have shown declines, coinciding historically with the advent of calculators.

Recent research by Ritchie et al. (2013) drew on longitudinal data from the Lothian Birth Cohort (LBC) studies to probe the link between education and intelligence. The Scottish Council for Research in Education assessed general intelligence in every 11-year-old child in Scotland in 1932 and 1947. These assessments provide a unique vantage point prior to the implementation of ability-differentiated education. The LBC studies tracked individuals from the Lothian region into old age. Ritchie et al. (2013) harnessed this extraordinary dataset to scrutinize whether education contributes distinct variance to intellectual capabilities in late life. After controlling for intelligence at age 11 and SES, their findings showed that educational level was predictive of late-life intelligence scores. Interestingly, the educational advantages were more pronounced for individuals with lower initial intelligence scores. Additionally, education did not significantly influence speed of processing tasks, an indicator of basic cognitive processing. Collectively, this research underscores the critical role of education during youth as a significant contributor to later-life intelligence. Given the robust predictive relationship between intelligence and various life outcomes, education’s role in shaping these outcomes becomes increasingly evident (Deary, 2012; Kuncel et al., 2004).

Among the revelations stemming from cognitive epidemiology, one of the most striking findings is the link between early-life educational achievement and subsequent health, longevity, and cognitive resilience in old age. Yet, discerning causal mechanisms within this intricate web is a formidable challenge. Various potential pathways come to light: education might foster health by granting economic advantages that enable better access to medical care, shaping disposition traits like conscientiousness that encourage self-regulation and self-care, establishing a lifestyle early on that promotes habits of mental stimulation fostering intellectual growth, or creating a consistent and predictable environment that acts as a buffer against the detrimental effects of stress. It’s also feasible that a life trajectory of generalized fitness emerges early in life due to a combination of genetic predisposition, prenatal influences, and early experiences, predisposing individuals to both seize educational opportunities and experience good health.

Resilience and reserve, constructs that have emerged in the realm of aging and adult development, broadly encapsulate the notion that older individuals can evade pathological risks associated with aging and counteract normative age-related cognitive declines. A consistent finding in clinical neuropsychology is the frequent discrepancy between the degree of brain pathology and its behavioral manifestations (e.g., cognitive performance or daily activity management). The brains of well-educated individuals, even after death, often display more evidence of brain pathology than those of less-educated individuals with comparable cognitive function before death. This phenomenon is attributed to ‘reserve capacity’, the concept that education fosters neural and cognitive growth, thus shielding against the impact of pathology (Christensen et al., 2008; Stern, 2009). Evidence from both animal and human training models underscores that experience can induce neurogenesis, or the growth of neural networks (Draganski et al., 2004, 2006; Kramer et al., 2004).

Within the realm of reserve, distinctions are drawn between passive and active models. Passive models emphasize the neuroprotective effects of brain capacity variation to withstand pathology, focusing on biophysical attributes like head circumference, brain volume, and synaptic density. Once a threshold is reached, both normative aging effects and pathological changes manifest clinically and behaviorally. In contrast, active models center on how individual differences in task processing contribute to cognitive optimization. Those with greater cognitive reserve are better equipped to compensate for the effects of aging through differential neural recruitment or alternative cognitive strategies. For instance, the effects of education on intelligence test scores (but not on processing speed tasks) could be attributed to greater effects on active reserve (Ritchie et al., 2013).

It’s important to note that explanations grounded in active and passive reserve aren’t mutually exclusive, as compensatory cognitive strategies are rooted in neural recruitment changes. Overall, the intricate interplay of education, cognitive reserve, and aging provides a captivating avenue for exploration, shedding light on the multifaceted mechanisms that contribute to cognitive health and resilience throughout the life span.

Research exploring the dual influence of early education and more proximal variables has unveiled evidence supporting the proposition that early educational attainment uniquely predicts cognitive health later in life. Within this context, studies have illuminated both independent and synergistic effects of education in conjunction with covariates like health status, cognitive activities in late life, and premorbid intelligence. Certain investigations have demonstrated independent contributions from education, whereas others have revealed that the impact of health and lifestyle choices in later life on cognition is more pronounced among individuals with lower levels of early formal education. This suggests that early educational experiences might act as a protective buffer against the effects of subsequent life choices on cognitive health.

While early-life educational attainment and later-life cognitive ability share a robust correlation, whether education influences rates of dementia through attenuation of cognitive decline remains uncertain. Some studies have indicated that education moderates the rate of cognitive decline, yet recent findings from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study—a large-scale investigation encompassing over 9000 ethnically diverse community-based elders—have reported no effects of education on age-related declines in episodic memory or verbal fluency over 15 years, despite a strong initial correlation between education and cognitive abilities (Schneider et al., 2012). Such extensive studies challenging the notion that early educational attainment mitigates cognitive decline should be approached with careful consideration.

One challenge in interpreting the effects of education on cognitive change arises from using the total number of years of education as a proxy for educational attainment and cognitive reserve. Self-reported total years of education surprisingly correlate strongly with cognitive reserve (Stern, 2009). However, more immediate measures of cognitive reserve and educational attainment may hold greater relevance, especially in populations where the number of education years might not adequately capture the quality of educational experiences. Literacy, premorbid verbal ability, and reading comprehension have been proposed as more accurate indicators of cognitive reserve than the total years of education, particularly among underserved populations. A study of ethnically diverse non-demented elders by Manly et al. (2005) found that increased literacy rates were associated not only with higher baseline cognitive capacity but also with slower longitudinal declines in memory, executive function, and fluency over an 8-year span. Recent research has affirmed that measures of literacy predict language comprehension and memory among older adults, with greater benefits for those with lower cognitive capacity (Payne et al., 2012; Kave et al., 2012).

However, interpreting longitudinal findings proves challenging due to the considerable variability in the effects of education on cognitive decline across individuals and the non-linear nature of these effects. The protective effects of education appear to diminish as brain pathology increases, resulting in highly educated individuals experiencing steeper declines in function once a pathology threshold is reached (Stern, 2009). This counterintuitive finding is pivotal to understanding how education affects cognitive health. Early-life protective factors, such as education, compress cognitive morbidity, preserving abilities (or delaying disease effects) until later in life. This phenomenon has led to estimates suggesting that the protective effects of education (comparing individuals with differing educational levels) are equivalent to a delay of more than 20 years in normative cognitive aging (Schneider et al., 2012). However, once highly educated individuals encounter the pathology threshold, terminal cognitive declines initiate with an accelerated negative trajectory. The non-linear nature of this trajectory, determined by an individual’s proximity to terminal decline, makes it challenging to interpret the effects of education on longitudinal change without knowledge of individual terminal thresholds. Studies that have examined rates of cognitive decline relative to such thresholds have observed education-dependent compression effects (Stern, 2009).

Lastly, it has been argued that the literature lacks ‘full’ tests of the effects of education on cognitive and brain reserve, as a comprehensive examination necessitates measuring reserve (e.g., education, occupation, engagement in activities), neural integrity or pathology (e.g., brain amyloid), and cognitive ability or clinical impairment (Christensen et al., 2008). Results from the Religious Orders Study (Bennett et al., 2003) offer a clear example of a ‘full’ test of cognitive reserve among highly educated individuals. This study discovered that higher levels of dementia-related brain pathology (e.g., amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, Lewy bodies) at autopsy correlated with lower cognitive function before death. However, this correlation between brain pathology markers and cognitive function was less pronounced among those with higher formal education. Recent findings, such as those from the Epidemiological Clinicopathological Studies in Europe (EClipSE) collaboration (EClipSE Collaborative Members, 2010), further support active models of education’s compensatory effects on dementia onset in older adulthood. EClipSE integrated longitudinal data from three population-based studies, each encompassing postmortem brain donations, clinical dementia investigation, and measurements of educational attainment (N ≈ 872). While education correlated with reduced dementia risk and greater brain size overall, no direct relationship existed between education and risk of neurodegenerative or vascular pathology. However, education did moderate how all measures of neurovascular pathology related to the clinical expression of dementia. These findings suggest that although higher education does not directly protect against vascular and neurodegenerative diseases (though it might indirectly through brain size associations), it does mitigate the detrimental impact of neuropathological burden on cognitive function.

Education in Adulthood

Education in adulthood in formal settings (e.g., courses with defined goals, criteria for success, and evaluation) is not currently normative. However, such formal educational experiences have the potential to contribute to adult development along a number of lines, including the enhancement of work-related skills, acquisition of knowledge and skills to effectively manage everyday life (e.g., parenting, managing health care for a family, retirement decisions), and as a pathway to lifelong health. Currently, educational activities in adulthood are more typically the informal sort, including investment in work, literacy activities, hobbies, and social activities.

It is surprising to many to learn that many people enter adulthood lacking in the basic literacy and numeracy skills needed to fully participate in work, family, and civic life. A recent report from the National Research Council (2012) summarized evidence, based on a nationally representative sample in the US, that only about 57% of adults have prose literacy skills that would be considered above basic proficiency, and that only about 55% have quantitative literacy skills in that range. Thus, there are many adults, who have acquired basic skills in word decoding, reading simple sentences, and arithmetic, but are unable to use these skills to draw inferences, reason, or make decisions. Thus, many of the institutions for adult education exist to provide remedial instruction to help adults develop proficiency in reading and quantitative reasoning. Adults also find their way into educational venues for work-related training, as well as instruction to support avocation-related interests.

In contrast to the literature on the lifelong effects of early education on intellectual growth, the research base on the ongoing effects of continued schooling is, perhaps not surprisingly, thinner. After all, it is not normative for adults to be engaged in formal educational activities, and when they are, they have made the choice to engage in these activities, so that cross-sectional comparisons are vulnerable to selectivity biases. Nevertheless, what literature there is strongly points to the conclusion that both formal schooling and certain forms of activity engagement can support preservation and growth in both crystallized and fluid abilities. For example, Beier and Ackerman (2005) provided a life span sample (age 19–68) of individuals with educational modules in health- and technology-related topics, and showed that existing initial strengths in fluid and crystallized abilities and prior knowledge contributed to the development of domain-specific knowledge. Hatch et al. (2007) showed that participation in work-related and elective educational experiences by the age of 43 contributed to the levels of verbal ability and verbal memory in later life when early life education, social mobility, and prior cognitive ability were controlled (thus, reducing the impact of reverse causation).

There is abundant evidence from the literature that adults can benefit from explicit training in particular cognitive abilities (e.g., speed, reasoning, memory training), though less clear are the principles by which training particular cognitive skills transfers, or generalizes to, broader cognitive capacities and knowledge growth (Stine-Morrow and Basak, 2011). Another area of relevant research is that on the effects of cognitive enrichment in the form of late-life activity engagement. Hertzog et al. (2008) extensively reviewed the literature and identified seven large-scale studies that measured both rates of activity engagement and rates of cognitive decline over time. They found significant associations across all but one of the studies, some of which had sample sizes of over 4000 individuals. Similar associations have also been found between rates of mentally stimulating activities and the incidence of cognitive impairment (Alzheimer’s and mild cognitive impairment). While these findings are highly suggestive, they do not necessarily indicate a causal relationship between stimulating activity engagement and improved cognition. Muddying this causal relationship is the substantial difficulty with measuring intellectually stimulating activity, especially as perceptions of cognitive demand in an activity differ across individuals (Payne et al., 2011). Moreover, the level of cognitive activity could be a marker for other more proximal causes. Reduced cognitive activity could index early neuropathology, essentially suggesting a reversed causal direction of the relationship. Consistent with this argument is a recent longitudinal study suggesting that there are reciprocal relationships between change in activity engagement and change in cognition, such that individuals who decline more in some cognitive abilities (e.g., speed) show later declines in activity engagement. Cognitive activity does have a more long-term influence on cognitive change over decades; however, weakening the argument that reduced cognitive activity could be solely an indicator of a prodromal period of disease-related neuropathology. Another argument that has been proposed is that cognitive activity engagement may be a marker for a number of other beneficial health and SES outcomes, which benefit the quality of life. Importantly, however, some studies have shown that the relationship between late-life cognitive activity and the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease remain even after controlling for estimates of early-life cognitive activity and SES.

While engagement in formal education is not normative in adulthood, adults often do continue to work in substantively complex environments into late life, and this provides an important pathway to examine the relationship between informal educational opportunities and mental stimulation. In an interesting approach to examine the impact of work on cognitive resilience, Rohwedder and Willis (2010) compared cognitive scores across countries as a function of retirement policies, thus circumventing the issue of individual selection into complex environments, assuming that individuals have minimal control over national retirement policies. Rohwedder and Willis analyzed data from three cross-national surveys that provide comparable assessments of cognition: the Health and Retirement Survey in the United States; the English Longitudinal Study of Aging; and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, which collected data from 11 European countries. In each case, surveys were based on large nationally representative samples administered over the phone, in which cognition was assessed by delayed recall for 10 concrete nouns (a task that typically shows age declines). Results showed that individuals in countries that had policies incentivizing early retirement (e.g., by taxing earned income at a higher rate) had steeper declines in memory between the early 1950s and early 1960s, relative to those who lived in countries whose tax policies encouraged continued work. Although correlational, the relationship between engagement in work and mental decline reported by Rohwedder and Willis strongly implies that the mental demands of work promote cognitive resilience.

Certainly, let’s delve deeper into the implications of education in adulthood and its potential impacts on cognitive development, resilience, and overall well-being.

As adults age, the demands and challenges they face evolve. Education in adulthood becomes an avenue through which individuals can adapt to changing circumstances, acquire new skills, and enhance their cognitive abilities. The concept of “lifelong learning” emphasizes the importance of continuous education throughout one’s life to keep up with the demands of an ever-changing world. Lifelong learning encompasses both formal education, such as enrolling in courses or pursuing degrees, and informal learning through reading, workshops, online resources, and personal experiences.

One critical aspect of education in adulthood is its role in maintaining cognitive health and preventing cognitive decline. Research has shown that engaging in mentally stimulating activities and continuing to learn new things can have positive effects on cognitive function and may even reduce the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. Cognitive engagement through activities like learning a new language, playing musical instruments, solving puzzles, or participating in intellectually challenging hobbies can help keep the brain active and resilient.

Moreover, the benefits of education in adulthood extend beyond cognitive health. Acquiring new skills or knowledge can enhance an individual’s self-confidence, increase their sense of accomplishment, and boost their overall well-being. Learning new things can provide a sense of purpose and motivation, particularly during transitional phases of life such as retirement. It can also promote social interactions and networking, as individuals engage with peers who share similar interests and passions.

In today’s rapidly changing job market, continuous learning is becoming increasingly essential for career advancement. As technology evolves, many industries require workers to adapt to new tools and practices. Lifelong learning ensures that individuals remain relevant and competitive in their fields, enhancing their employability and opening up new opportunities.

However, it’s important to acknowledge that not all adults have equal access to educational opportunities. Socioeconomic factors, personal responsibilities, and health conditions can influence an individual’s ability to engage in formal education or pursue enrichment activities. Addressing these barriers and promoting lifelong learning for all segments of society is crucial for creating an inclusive and empowered community.

In conclusion, education in adulthood plays a multifaceted role in individual development. It contributes to cognitive health, personal growth, career advancement, and social engagement. Lifelong learning provides a means for adults to adapt to changing environments, develop new skills, and enrich their lives in meaningful ways. As societies continue to evolve, promoting and supporting education in adulthood should be a priority to ensure that individuals of all ages can thrive in an ever-changing world.


In conclusion, the literature reviewed highlights the valuable role that education plays in shaping cognitive development and overall well-being across the entire life span. Despite the numerous benefits associated with education, there are challenges and gaps that need to be addressed to create a comprehensive model of lifelong education.

One of the key challenges is the lack of rigorous research on the effectiveness of adult education and learning interventions. While there is growing evidence suggesting the positive relationship between intellectual activity engagement and cognitive health, there is a need for more intervention studies that assess the causal impact of such activities on cognitive outcomes. Programs like the Experience Corps Project, Senior Odyssey Project, and Osher Lifelong Learning Institute have shown promising results by engaging older adults in mentally stimulating activities, indicating the potential benefits of substantively complex environments for cognitive resilience.

Creating an optimal model of adult life span education requires considering the normative changes that occur with age, including declines in certain cognitive functions and shifts in cognitive strategies. The challenge lies in making educational resources easily accessible to adults with diverse lifestyles and competing demands. Technology is expected to play a significant role in addressing these challenges, as online resources and digital platforms can provide flexible and efficient learning opportunities.

As discussions often focus on healthcare systems adapting to an aging population, the importance of adapting education systems has often been overlooked. However, the need for fundamental changes in the nature of education is equally crucial. Developing a coherent and effective model of lifelong education will require collaboration between researchers, educators, policymakers, and technology developers to ensure that individuals of all ages can continue to learn, grow, and thrive throughout their lives. By addressing these challenges and leveraging innovative approaches, we can work toward a future where lifelong learning becomes an integral part of every individual’s journey.


  1. Baltes, P.B., Staudinger, U.M., Lindenberger, U., 1999. Lifespan psychology: theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology 50, 471–507.
  2. Bennett, D.A., Wilson, R.S., Schneider, J.A., et al., 2003. Education modifies the relation of AD pathology to level of cognitive function in older persons. Neurology 60, 1909–1915.
  3. Beier, M.E., Ackerman, P.L., 2005. Age, ability, and the role of prior knowledge on the acquisition of new domain knowledge: promising results in a real-world learning environment. Psychology and Aging 20, 341–355.
  4. Bialystok, E., Craik, F.I.M., Green, D.W., Gollan, T.H., 2010. Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 10, 89–129.
  5. Brinch, C.N., Galloway, T.A., 2012. Schooling in adolescence raises IQ scores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 109, 425–430.
  6. Ceci, S.J., Williams, W.M., 1997. Schooling, intelligence, and income. American Psychologist 52, 1051–1058.
  7. Christensen, H., Anstey, K.J., Leach, L.S., Mackinnon, A.J., 2008. Intelligence, Education, and the Brain Reserve Hypothesis the Handbook of Aging and Cognition, third ed. Psychology Press, New York. pp. 133–188.
  8. Deary, I.J., 2012. Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology 63, 453–482.
  9. Deary, I.J., Johnson, W., 2010. Intelligence and education: causal drive analytic processes and therefore conclusions. International Journal of Epidemiology 39, 1362–1369.
  10. Deary, I.J., Johnson, W., 2011. Authors’ response: is education causal? Yes. International Journal of Epidemiology 40 (2), 516–518.
  11. Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., May, A., 2004. Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature 427, 311–312.
  12. Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H.G., Winkler, J., Buchel, C., May, A., 2006. Temporal and spatial dynamics of brain structure changes during extensive learning. The Journal of Neuroscience 26, 6314–6317.
  13. EClipSE Collaborative Members, 2010. Education, the brain, and dementia: neuroprotection or compensation? Brain: A Journal of Neurology 133, 2210–2216.
  14. Hartman-Stein, P., LaRue, A. (Eds.), 2011. Enhancing Cognitive Fitness: A Guide to the Use and Development of Community Programs. Springer, New York.
  15. Hatch, S.L., Feinstein, L., Link, B.G., Wadsworth, M.E.J., Richards, M., 2007. The continuing benefits of education: adult education and midlife cognitive ability in the British 1946 birth cohort. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 62B, S404–S414.
  16. Herrnstein, R.J., Murray, C., 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. Free Press, New York.
  17. Hertzog, C., Kramer, A.F., Wilson, R.S., Lindenberger, U., 2008. Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9, 1–65.
  18. Kave, G., Amit, S., Spaiter, T., Ben-Ezra, M., 2012. Formal education level versus self-rated literacy as predictors of cognitive aging. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 67, 697–704.
  19. Kramer, A.F., Bherer, L., Colcombe, S.J., Dong, W., Greenough, W.T., 2004. Environmental influences on cognitive and brain plasticity during aging. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences 59A, 940–957.
  20. Kuncel, N.R., Hezlett, S.A., Ones, D.S., 2004. Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86, 148–161.
  21. Lovden, M., Backman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaeffer, S., Schmiedek, F., 2010. A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity. Psychological Bulletin 136, 659–676.
  22. MacKinnon, D.P., Fairchild, A.J., Fritz, M.S., 2007. Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology 58, 593–614.
  23. Manly, J.J., Schupf, N., Tank, M.X., Stern, Y., 2005. Cognitive decline and literacy among ethnically diverse elders. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 18, 213–217.
  24. Metcalfe, J., Kornell, N., 2005. A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language 52, 463–477.
  25. National Research Council, 2012. Improving Adult Literacy Instruction: Options for Practice and Research. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
  26. Noble, K.G., Grieve, S.M., Korgaonkar, M.S., Engelhardt, L.E., Griffith, E.Y., Williams, L.M., Brickman, A.M., 2012. Hippocampal volume varies with educational attainment across the life-span. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6, 1–10. Article 307.
  27. Payne, B.R., Gao, X., Noh, S.R., Anderson, C.J., Stine-Morrow, E.A.L., 2012. The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: evidence for efficiency and reserve. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 19, 122–149.
  28. Richards, M., Sacker, A., 2011. Is education causal? Yes. International Journal of Epidemiology 40, 516–518.
  29. Riley, M.W., Riley Jr., J.W., 2000. Age integration: conceptual and historical background. The Gerontologist 40, 266–270.
  30. Ritchie, S.J., Bates, T.C., Der, G., Starr, J.M., Deary, I.J., 2013. Education is associated with higher later life IQ scores, but not with faster cognitive processing speed. Psychology and Aging 28 (2), 515–521.
  31. Rohwedder, S., Willis, R.J., 2010. Mental retirement. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 119–138.
  32. Schaie, K.W., Zanjani, F.A.K., 2006. Intellectual development across adulthood. In: Hoare, C. (Ed.), Handbook of Adult Development and Learning. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 99–122.
  33. Schneider, A.L.C., Sharrett, A.R., Patel, M.D., Alonso, A., Coresh, J., Mosley, T., Gottesman, R.F., 2012. Education and cognitive change on 15 years: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. JAGS 60, 1847–1853.
  34. Stern, Y., 2009. Cognitive reserve. Neuropsycholgia 47, 2015–2028.
  35. Stine-Morrow, E.A.L., Basak, C., 2011. Cognitive interventions. In: Schaie, K.W., Willis, S.L. (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, seventh ed. Elsevier, New York, pp. 153–170.
  36. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2002. World Population Ageing: 1950–2050.

Back to Developmental Psychology