Prenatal Development and Infancy

Prenatal Development and InfancyThis passage highlights the fact that human development begins at conception, not just at birth. Prenatal development encompasses various domains, including physical, cognitive, and psychosocial, with both genetic and experiential factors influencing these developments. The article also emphasizes that infancy, which covers the first two years after birth, is a period of rapid and significant changes across all domains of development. The key areas discussed include brain development, sensory perception, cognitive growth, temperament, and attachment. However, the passage acknowledges that the topics covered are just a glimpse into the extensive range of changes that occur during gestation and infancy. It recommends exploring additional sources for a more comprehensive understanding of subjects like fetal programming, prematurity, language development, and social cognition, which are relevant to early stages of human development.

Prenatal Development

Sensory Development

The intricate journey of development commences long before birth, with the earliest stages characterized by the emergence of sensory capacities. Despite the challenges of directly observing fetal responses, groundbreaking research has unveiled the intricacies of sensory development in the prenatal period. While animal studies have paved the way for understanding chemosensory experiences in early fetuses, investigations involving human fetuses have predominantly focused on auditory responsiveness during the latter half of gestation. This wealth of knowledge has been gleaned from studies involving prematurely born infants and innovative noninvasive techniques that shed light on the hidden world within the womb.

Modern advancements in technology have enabled researchers to delve into the realm of fetal sensory perception. By harnessing the magnetic fields generated by active neurons within fetal brain tissue, scientists can decipher a fetus’s reactions to auditory stimuli with remarkable precision (Huotilainen, Kujala, & Hotakainen, 2005; Zappasodi, Tecchio, & Pizzella, 2001). This pioneering approach provides invaluable insights into the sensory experiences of these tiny individuals.

The developmental trajectory of the senses within the womb follows a sequential path, unveiling a fascinating timeline of emergence. Between the 8th and 26th weeks of gestation, the senses unfold in a carefully orchestrated sequence. Touch, the earliest sense to awaken, lays the foundation for subsequent sensory developments. Following suit, taste and smell gradually come to fruition, weaving a sensory tapestry that connects the fetus to its environment. The sense of hearing emerges, marking a significant step forward in the fetal journey of sensory perception. Finally, in a crescendo of development, the sense of vision completes the sensory symphony, allowing the fetus to begin engaging with the visual aspects of its world.

While our understanding of prenatal sensory development has expanded significantly, it is important to acknowledge the complexity and intricacy of this process. This is just the tip of the iceberg, offering a mere glimpse into the myriad changes and adaptations that transpire within the womb. Exploring further sources can provide a deeper dive into subjects like fetal programming, prematurity, language acquisition, and social cognition, enriching our understanding of the intricate world of prenatal and infant development.


The intricate journey of sensory development within the womb unfolds in astonishing ways, with the sense of touch taking center stage as one of the earliest senses to awaken. This sensory marvel starts to make its presence known in the early stages of gestation, paving the way for a remarkable sequence of developmental milestones (Field, 1990).

As early as 8 weeks into gestation, the fetus demonstrates a responsiveness to touch or pressure, marking the initial inklings of tactile perception. The area surrounding the lips becomes a canvas for these early tactile responses, as the fetus engages in movements in response to touch stimuli. A mere 12 weeks into this journey, a captivating development takes place—when fingers are touched, the fetus responds with the grace of a grasping movement. This early manifestation of the grasp reflex holds a promise of future developmental marvels.

Throughout gestation, the fetus embarks on a dance with touch, showcasing evolving responses that mirror its growth and maturation. In the early stages, the fetus tends to withdraw from the source of touch, responding to stimuli by moving away—a reflexive protective mechanism. However, as gestation progresses, a shift in responsiveness occurs, revealing a newfound affinity for touch. The fetus begins to move toward the source of stimulation, engaging with its environment in a more proactive manner. This transformation is exemplified by the fascinating rooting-like responses elicited by touch stimulation on the cheek. These responses, while they are vital for the fetus to locate the source of nourishment, also lay the foundation for future interactions with the world outside the womb.

The culmination of this sensory journey arrives at birth, where the newborn’s sensory abilities to perceive touch and interpret body motion stand as some of the most advanced developmental achievements (Field, 1990). The complex interplay between touch and body motion underscores the importance of these senses in early interactions and survival.

In tracing the development of the sense of touch from its inception within the womb to its zenith at birth, we gain a profound appreciation for the intricate process of sensory evolution. This remarkable journey, driven by both genetic predispositions and experiential influences, highlights the remarkable capacity of the developing fetus to engage with its environment even before entering the world.

Taste and Smell

The intricate interplay of taste and smell is a sensory symphony that unfolds within the realm of prenatal development. While our understanding of these senses in the fetal context is a blend of conclusions drawn from scientific inquiry and a tapestry of fascinating observations, their role in shaping early sensory experiences is undeniable.

Early scientific explorations reveal a tantalizing glimpse into the world of fetal gustatory and olfactory perception. Researchers have inferred that fetuses possess the remarkable ability to detect tastes and scents, with a particular affinity for sweetness. While direct evidence for specific fetal chemosensory preferences remains elusive, tantalizing clues hint at the intricate dance of flavors and aromas even within the womb.

The connection between the mother’s diet and the fetal sensory experience is a pivotal aspect of this journey. Flavors and odors from the maternal diet traverse into the fetal domain through the amniotic fluid and bloodstream, paving the way for the sensation of taste and smell to permeate the fetus’s nascent senses. The dynamic dance between the fetal nose, mouth, and bloodstream transforms into a sensory symphony, orchestrating an intricate connection between the developing fetus and its maternal environment.

Around the 10th week of gestation, a captivating chapter unfolds as the fetus embarks on the experience of breathing movements. With these movements, a transformational process is set in motion, as amniotic fluid not only becomes ingested but also navigates through the fetal nose after dissolving the plugs blocking the nostrils. This transformational event opens avenues for the fetal senses to engage with the world in profound ways, as both taste and smell weave their magic through the pathways of the fetal body.

The symphony of sensations continues as blood circulation ushers in a dynamic fusion of smells and tastes within the fetal realm. This intricate journey deepens the connection between the fetal senses and the world beyond, setting the stage for a sensory awakening that will resonate even after birth. The transition from the fetal to neonatal existence brings with it a rich tapestry of sensory experiences. The neonate’s ability to detect an array of odors and flavors heralds the emergence of preferences, with the scent of the mother capturing a special place in this symphony of sensory experiences.

In tracing the intricate path of taste and smell from the womb to the world, we are reminded of the remarkable capacity of the developing fetus to engage with the environment through senses that transcend barriers and evolve over time. This journey invites us to marvel at the symphony of sensations that unfolds even before birth, shaping the foundations of our relationship with the world of flavors and aromas.


Amid the hidden world of prenatal development, the intricate melodies of sound begin to weave their way into the tapestry of the fetal experience. The journey of auditory development is a gradual symphony that unfolds over weeks and months, culminating in a crescendo of responsiveness and connection to the surrounding world.

The delicate overture of auditory development commences around the 6th week of gestation, setting the stage for the gradual evolution of the fetal auditory system. As the weeks unfold, intricate transformations pave the way for the emergence of a fully formed auditory pathway. By the 28th week, the fetus reaches a significant milestone, where the auditory system’s sophistication is such that it can reliably respond to sounds. Startling movements and an increased heart rate emerge as the notes of the fetal response, a testament to the growing harmony between the world of sound and the developing fetus.

The prenatal environment, a sanctuary of sensations, envelops the fetus in a symphony of auditory experiences. The mother’s voice, a soothing lullaby that resonates through the amniotic fluid, becomes a constant companion. The sonorous echoes of her gastrointestinal sounds and the rhythmic cadence of her heartbeat create a comforting backdrop to the fetal journey. Yet, the auditory experience transcends these internal melodies. In the final trimester, the fetus takes its first steps into the realm of external sounds that traverse the uterine walls. As if listening through a delicate membrane, the fetus becomes attuned to the sounds of the world that lies beyond its sanctuary.

In this intricate dance of sound, the fetus embraces a world of auditory sensations that form a foundation for future connections. The melodies that surround the fetus serve as a prelude to the broader auditory experiences that will unfold after birth. From the harmonious resonance of the maternal voice to the subtle vibrations of external sounds, the prenatal journey of auditory development paves the way for a lifelong symphony of sensory engagement.

As we peer into the hidden world of intrauterine sound, we are reminded of the profound ways in which the developing fetus engages with the world through sound. This journey invites us to appreciate the intricate melodies that shape the early foundations of auditory perception, a symphony that begins its overture long before the first breath of life is taken.


Within the intricate choreography of prenatal development, the stage is set for the gradual unveiling of the sense of vision. Like a delicate masterpiece painted over weeks and months, the development of fetal vision is a process of intricate brushstrokes that gradually come together to create a portrait of the visual world.

Around the 8th week of gestation, the canvas of fetal vision begins to take form. The lens, eyelids, and the delicate muscles orchestrating the symphony of eye movement make their appearance. As the weeks progress, the optic nerve weaves its intricate threads, completing its integration in each eye by the 15th week. The crescendo arrives at the 28th week, where the burgeoning visual cortex in the brain takes on the resemblance of its adult counterpart.

Yet, the tale of fetal vision unfolds against a backdrop of shadows. The in utero environment, shrouded in darkness, offers limited opportunities for visual engagement. While the fetus can flutter its eyelids and partake in the subtle ballet of blinking, the realm of visual input remains relatively veiled. It is only when the curtains of the womb part prematurely, ushering in the external world, that the fetal gaze can discern the dance between light and dark. The premature newborn, emerging into a world of newfound brightness, already possesses the fledgling ability to detect changes in luminance.

Amidst the intricate layers of visual development, a revelation emerges. Vision, perhaps the least mature of the senses in utero, is marked by an inherent promise of growth. The neural pathways guiding visual information are still taking shape, and the eyes themselves are works in progress. The canvas of fetal vision is imbued with potential, a potential that will continue to flourish in the postnatal world.

As we peer into the unfolding panorama of fetal vision, we are reminded of the delicate brushstrokes that shape this sense. The journey of fetal vision is a tale of emergence, where the canvas is gradually filled with the hues of light and shadow. It is a story that continues to evolve beyond the confines of the womb, painting a picture of visual perception that will continue to captivate and inspire long after the first glimpse of light is taken.

Neurobehavioral Development and Functioning

In the secret theater of prenatal life, the curtains rise on a captivating performance—the unfolding of neurobehavioral development. Within the intricate choreography of neural pathways and physiological responses, a symphony of life begins to play. This symphony not only unveils the earliest inklings of human behavior but also offers a window into the health and vitality of the fetal nervous systems—both central and peripheral.

In this enigmatic theater, the star of the show is fetal activity. It is through the lens of fetal activity patterns that we glimpse the intricate dance of neural mechanisms in action. These patterns, generated by the symphony of neural signals, serve as a compass guiding us through the labyrinth of prenatal development. The rhythms and sequences of movement paint a portrait of the fetus’s nascent behavioral repertoire—a repertoire that is central to understanding the very beginnings of human behavior.

The quest to decipher the language of fetal neurobehavioral development has been illuminated by the advent of modern technologies. Real-time ultrasound and Doppler-based electronic fetal monitors act as our eyes and ears, allowing us to peer into the hidden landscapes of the womb. These technological marvels provide a glimpse into the neural symphony, capturing the harmony of four distinct dimensions of fetal functioning.

First, the canvas of fetal neurobehavioral assessment is painted with strokes of motor activity. The gentle flutter of limbs and the subtle nudges against the uterine wall tell a story of movement guided by neural impulses—an embryonic dance of burgeoning life.

Second, the heartbeat, a metronome of existence, joins the symphony. Changes in heart rate serve as a mirror reflecting the intricate interplay between the fetal nervous system and the outside world—a rhythmic dialog between life within and the external environment.

Third, the ebb and flow of behavioral states cast shifting shadows on the neural stage. From moments of tranquil inactivity to lively bursts of activity, the fetus transitions between different states—an eloquent ballet orchestrated by the unseen hands of neural regulation.

And finally, the responsiveness to stimulation completes the quartet. As external forces gently touch the fetal realm, neural pathways light up, signaling a dynamic interplay between sensation and response—an early glimpse into the neural orchestration of perception.

This multidimensional neurobehavioral assessment, crafted through the fusion of modern technology and ancient curiosity, holds immense promise. Not only does it unveil the delicate symphony of prenatal neural functioning, but it also offers a beacon to monitor the health and vitality of the fetal nervous systems.

In this theater of life, the unfolding neurobehavioral symphony is a testament to the marvels of life’s inception. It is a melody that resonates across the realms of science, art, and wonder—a symphony that continues to play, capturing the essence of life’s earliest manifestations.

Motor Activity

In the hidden realms of the womb, a silent ballet of movement unfolds—a mesmerizing choreography that offers a glimpse into the earliest stirrings of life. The stage for this intricate performance is set between 7 and 16 weeks of gestation, as the embryo’s delicate forms start to stir. This dance of motor activity, like the fluttering of a butterfly’s wings, marks the dawn of a fascinating journey of prenatal development.

At its inception, the repertoire of fetal movements is humble, a collection of subtle gestures that gradually blossom into a rich tapestry of motion. This evolution is a testament to the intricate symphony of neural signals orchestrating the movements. Within this symphony, movements come in two distinct forms—a juxtaposition of large generalized motions and the intricate ballet of specific body parts.

In the early stages, the fetus’s movements appear like random brushstrokes on a canvas, scattered and unpredictable. However, as time unfurls, a harmonious transformation emerges. Movements synchronize, forming clusters of coordinated bursts. These bursts, like musical crescendos, give rise to longer periods of rhythmic activity, reminiscent of a grand performance unfurling on a cosmic stage.

The nuances of this choreography are a testament to the developmental journey within. As the fetus matures, the tempo of movement shifts, and the nature of activity transforms. Vigorous motions become intertwined with fleeting moments of stillness, creating a delicate interplay of rhythm and pause. These pauses, these moments of hushed anticipation, hint at the intricate neural tapestry weaving its narrative.

It is within this silent dance that we find markers of neural development. The ebbs and flows of movement paint a portrait of neural maturation, offering a canvas where each brushstroke whispers tales of growth. The increasing vigor of movements during the second half of gestation speaks of an orchestra of neural signals reaching a crescendo, a crescendo that reverberates across the vast expanse of prenatal life.

And within this dance of life, another phenomenon emerges—motor inhibition. Amidst the swirl of movements, periods of stillness emerge, moments when the stage falls silent. These interludes of quiet are not voids but rather the punctuation marks of neural advancement. Motor inhibition becomes a delicate waltz, an indicator of the intricate neural symphony’s refinement.

In the grand theater of life’s inception, the dance of fetal motor activity is a testament to the wonders of development. It is a story told in movements, a symphony written by neural pathways, a performance that unfurls across time and space, a testament to life’s earliest murmurs.

Fetal Heart Rate

In the gentle embrace of the womb, a tiny heart orchestrates a captivating rhythm—a rhythm that tells a story of growth, maturation, and vitality. This ethereal cadence, known as the fetal heart rate, unveils the intricate dance between life’s earliest pulses and the symphony of neural development.

The heart of a healthy fetus dances to a unique melody, beating at a pace almost twice as fast as that of an adult. A mesmerizing tempo, fluctuating between 120 and 160 beats per minute, paints the canvas of prenatal existence. Across the span of a day, the rhythm of this miniature heart takes us on a journey of peaks and valleys, offering glimpses into the ebb and flow of neural responsiveness.

The rise and fall of fetal heart rate variability are like verses of a poetic ballad. Spontaneous accelerations mirror the awakening of the sympathetic nervous system, a testament to the intricacies of life’s earliest neural pathways. And as the days unfold, a larger narrative emerges—the maturation of the nervous system, a tale told in the cadence of heartbeats.

The fetal heart’s tempo echoes the passage of time. Like the crescendo of a symphony, the heart rate follows a trajectory of change, a graceful dance of decrease in rate and rise in variability. Yet, amidst this musical progression, a symphony of caution arises. Decelerations after 28 weeks mark a solemn note, a potential harbinger of pathology, a reminder that even within the womb, life’s journey is not without its challenges.

Contrary to common beliefs, the fetal heart’s melody is not in synchrony with its mother’s rhythm. The rhythm of the two hearts remains independent, separate beats that coexist harmoniously. The tranquil moments of a mother’s rest do not sway the fetal heart’s rhythm, nor does the fetal heart’s tempo echo in the chambers of the mother’s heart.

In the quietude of this sonorous journey, another motif emerges—the dance of heart rate acceleration entwined with fetal movements. A duet of life and motion, this coupling is not merely a performance but a proclamation of well-being. The resonance between these two systems—a symphony and a dance—speaks of an evolving central nervous system, a union of pathways and possibilities.

In the sacred cocoon of the womb, the fetal heart’s lullaby unfolds—an ethereal cadence that intertwines life’s earliest pulses with the rhythms of neural development. A symphony of heartbeats, a journey through peaks and valleys, a narrative of growth—this is the song that heralds the dawn of existence.

Behavioral States

Within the hidden sanctum of the womb, a silent ballet of states unfolds—an intricate choreography of eye and motor movements, heart rate fluctuations, and distinct patterns that paint a canvas of fetal development. These behavioral states, like movements in a dance, provide a glimpse into the burgeoning neural symphony that underlies the enigma of life before birth.

Around the 28-week mark, the fetus embarks on a journey of rest and activity, marking the inception of behavioral states. A quartet of fully formed states emerges around 36 weeks, each with its own nuances and rhythms: quiet sleep, active sleep, quiet awake, and active awake. Each state carries its unique signature, woven by eye movements, heart rate cadences, and the ebb and flow of body motion (de Vries & Hopkins, 2005).

In the hushed embrace of quiet sleep, the fetus finds respite. Eye movements cease, and the heart rate steadies within a narrow range—a moment of stillness within the symphony of movement. Active sleep unfurls with an exuberant flourish, marked by eye movements that dance across the horizon. The heart rate swings in a wider arc, punctuated by stretches and fluid motions—a lively interlude that paints the canvas of fetal vitality.

Quiet awake, like a tranquil interlude, unveils itself with a calm facade. Gross body movements subside, and the heart rate remains stable, yet its rhythm spans a broader spectrum of possibilities. Absent are the heart rate accelerations that punctuate other states—a tranquil tableau of contemplation. The stage transforms once again with the entrance of active awake, a state characterized by ceaseless eye movements and a torrent of vigorous activities. The heart rate becomes a metronome of exuberance, oscillating wildly with each movement, and accelerations mark the cadence of a spirited performance.

As the fetus traverses the threshold of state changes, a tapestry of neural development unfolds. Behavioral states mirror the symphony of the nervous system, resonating with the pulse of fetal health. These states hold secrets, serving as a window into the inner workings of neural integrity. In their subtle transitions and harmonious patterns, they whisper of normalcy or herald abnormalities—a silent sentinel guarding the sanctum of prenatal existence.

The journey between states is not swift; it is a lingering transition that speaks to the intricacies of neural maturation. Fetal dancers take their time, orchestrating shifts with a deliberate grace, a contrast to the quick tempo of neonatal state changes. Through these states, neural functioning unfurls—a delicate narrative that tells of the symphony of growth and the crescendo of fetal well-being.

In the exquisite choreography of fetal behavioral states, the womb becomes a theater, and the fetus a performer in the enigmatic dance of life’s earliest movements.


In the cocoon of the womb, the fetus is not an isolated entity; it’s a participant in a sensory ballet that extends beyond the confines of its prenatal haven. Like a dancer attuned to the rhythm of external stimuli, the fetus responds to the gentle whispers of the world beyond with its own movements—a symphony of sensations and reactions.

When soundwaves traverse the barrier of the womb, the fetus’s heart rate quickens in response, marking its acknowledgment of the auditory serenade. Yet, it is not just airborne sounds that awaken its senses; the fetus displays a heightened responsiveness to vibro-acoustic stimuli—akin to the vibrations of an electric toothbrush against the maternal abdomen. These vibrations ignite a symphony of heart rate accelerations and a choreography of body movements, underscoring the intimate connection between the fetus and the sensory world beyond.

But the dance of responsivity is not one of unending crescendos. Rather, it follows the rhythm of habituation—a dance of adaptation and self-regulation. Repeated exposure to stimuli leads to a gradual wane in response, a pattern known as habituation. This ebb and flow reflects the fetus’s ability to not only perceive the outside world but also to process and adjust to it—a testament to its burgeoning capacity for information processing and self-adjustment.

In the intricate tapestry of fetal development, responsivity becomes a duet between the internal and external worlds—a conversation between the emerging individual and the cosmos that awaits beyond the womb. As the fetus responds to the vibrational echoes and auditory whispers, it paints a portrait of its emerging awareness—a dance of sensations that bridges the realms of the known and the unknown.


In the intricate journey of fetal neurobehavioral development, patterns emerge that paint a portrait of predictability and progression. This developmental dance of the nervous system is marked by phases of rapid transformation, characterized by distinct shifts in heart rate dynamics, movement patterns, and their intricate interplay. This evolution is most pronounced between the 28th and 32nd weeks of gestation, a period of profound transition where heart rate slows, variability increases, and the bond between movement and heart rate strengthens.

As these changes unfold, a stable rhythm of development begins to crystallize, establishing the framework for the neurobehavioral symphony that will guide the fetus’s journey towards birth. These patterns of coupling and dissociation, which connect and disconnect fetal movement and heart rate, are not isolated occurrences—they are common threads that weave through the stories of fetuses across the spectrum.

In this delicate choreography of development, the universality of these patterns becomes evident, transcending individual differences and weaving a shared narrative of growth before birth. Yet, amidst this shared journey, lies a world of unanswered questions—a realm awaiting exploration. The underlying mechanisms that orchestrate this symphony remain a puzzle, a puzzle that beckons the curious minds of researchers to delve deeper into the intricate web of experiences and influences that shape fetal development.

As we conclude this chapter of exploration, it becomes clear that the story of fetal neurobehavioral development is one of discovery and wonder. A tale where predictability and universality intertwine with complexity and individuality—a tale that speaks to the boundless potential and intricacies of life’s earliest stages. And so, the future beckons with the promise of unveiling the secrets of this hidden realm, unraveling the mysteries that lie beneath the surface of fetal development, and shedding light on the unseen forces that guide the dance of life before birth.


The realm of teratology, a study rooted in unraveling the impact of prenatal exposure to external agents, has witnessed an evolution over time. From a traditional focus on physical harm inflicted upon the embryo or fetus, teratology has expanded its gaze to encompass the intricate nuances of the developing central nervous system and the profound behavioral repercussions that echo through time (Fried, 2002).

In this modern chapter of teratology, the spotlight is firmly cast upon the intricate tapestry of the developing nervous system and the intricate interplay between its growth and the unfolding behavioral manifestations. Within this context, the teratogenic risk factors that loom large as harbingers of negative outcomes in children have a distinct identity. Among these, the trinity of maternal tobacco use, alcohol consumption, and cocaine exposure has emerged as potent catalysts for concern.

Recent data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2005) paint a sobering picture: approximately 18 percent of pregnant women in the United States admit to smoking cigarettes, 9.8 percent acknowledge consuming alcohol, and 4 percent confess to engaging with illegal drugs in the preceding month. These numbers underscore the critical need for continued vigilance and research, as the impact of these substances on fetal development reverberates across generations, leaving an indelible mark on the trajectory of human lives.

As we navigate the complex landscape of teratology, the nexus between prenatal exposures and the subsequent unfolding of behavioral patterns beckons for our understanding. The quest to decipher the intricate links between substances and their enduring impact on the developing nervous system is an ongoing saga—one that holds the key to enhancing our ability to safeguard the health and potential of generations yet to come.


Tobacco, once regarded as a personal choice, casts a long and insidious shadow over the developing fetus, delivering its toxins through the conduit of the maternal bloodstream. The ramifications of maternal cigarette smoking extend far beyond the momentary act, infiltrating the delicate process of brain development and potentially sowing the seeds of neurophysiological deficits.

The fallout of prenatal exposure to maternal smoking is extensive, encompassing a range of perinatal and postnatal challenges. The litany of consequences includes reduced fetal growth, perturbed fetal heart rate regulation, preterm delivery, perinatal mortality, and compromised neonatal neurobehavioral functioning. In this arena, trembling startles and heightened distractibility become haunting hallmarks of the nascent nervous system (Zeskind & Gringras, 2006).

The imprint of prenatal smoking persists far beyond the first cry, echoing into the corridors of childhood and adolescence. A symphony of oppositional behaviors, criminal tendencies, and smoking inclinations finds its roots in the prenatal exposure to tobacco. Longitudinal studies reveal that the offspring of mothers who succumbed to smoking’s allure during pregnancy bear an elevated risk of traversing a trajectory strewn with these behavioral markers (Buka, Shenassa, & Niaura, 2003; Gibson, Piquero, & Tibbetts, 2000; Montreaux, Blacker, & Biederman, 2006).

Yet, the tale of tobacco’s impact doesn’t solely belong to those who partake in the act. The tentacles of its influence extend to those who inadvertently share the air, as maternal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke—commonly known as secondhand smoke—becomes an accomplice to these dire effects. The observations of Schuetze and Eiden (2006b) paint a vivid portrait: infants of mothers who were exposed to secondhand smoke or smoked cigarettes during pregnancy grapple with compromised nervous systems, evident in their altered baseline heart rate and diminished heart rate variability.

In this intricate dance between choices and consequences, tobacco emerges as a formidable antagonist, enmeshed in the delicate choreography of fetal neurodevelopment. As science unveils the intricacies of these connections, the urgency to illuminate the path to healthier beginnings becomes ever more pronounced.


Within the realm of maternal choices, alcohol occupies a pivotal space as a double-edged sword. A 2002 revelation laid bare the somber truth: more than half of women in their childbearing years imbibed alcohol without recourse to birth control, setting the stage for the intertwining of teratogenic exposure and potential pregnancy complications (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004).

The effects of prenatal alcohol exposure span a broad spectrum, unfolding a narrative that begins with fetal alcohol syndrome—the most severe outcome—and extends to a constellation of alcohol-related birth defects, neurodevelopmental disorders, and specific cognitive and psychosocial deficits. The journey through this continuum bears a solemn message: no level of alcohol consumption during pregnancy is exempt from the potential of causing harm. The reach of these impairments is pervasive, encompassing an array of cognitive deficiencies. The landscape is marked by the presence of mental delays, attention deficits, memory challenges, impaired learning, faltering problem-solving skills, disrupted action planning, and the compromise of state regulation (Howell, Lynch, Platzman, Smith, & Coles, 2006). This tapestry of impairment unravels as early as infancy and, distressingly, often continues its threads into adulthood (O’Connor & Paley, 2006).

The intricate dance of causality reveals that prenatal exposure to alcohol can evoke central nervous system anomalies, particularly in attentional processes. These, in turn, cast their shadow over higher-order cognitive functions, resulting in a cascade that compromises overall functioning. The narrative is not confined to cognitive boundaries; it spills into the realm of psychosocial functioning as well. The pages of research tell of hyperactivity, aggression, depression, interpersonal struggles, and even psychiatric disorders etched into the stories of those who experienced prenatal alcohol exposure (O’Connor & Paley, 2006).

The echoes of alcohol’s influence linger far beyond the initial sip, weaving a tapestry of complexities that demand attention and action. In the intersection of choices and consequences, the narrative of alcohol’s impact on the developing fetus beckons for a heightened awareness and a renewed commitment to nurturing the early chapters of life.


In recent years, a spotlight has shone on the impact of prenatal drug exposure, with much attention directed towards cocaine. The canvas of evidence reveals a narrative characterized by both modesty and consistency—modest in the extent of its effects, yet consistent in its presence. The brushstrokes of research paint a portrait of the influence of prenatal cocaine exposure on various facets of neurobehavioral functioning, physiological regulation, motor development, reactivity to frustration, attention and arousal regulation, and even language (Beeghly et al., 2006; Bendersky, Bennett, & Lewis, 2006; Dennis, Bendersky, Ramsay, & Lewis, 2006; Schuetze & Eiden, 2006a).

Within this tableau, a dosage effect emerges as a prominent theme. Infants exposed to higher levels of cocaine prenatally unfold a narrative of smaller birth head sizes, compromised physiological regulation, and a demeanor colored by more negative interactions with their mothers (Behnke et al., 2006; Schuetze & Eiden, 2006a; Tronick et al., 2005). The tale told is one of proportions—proportions that shift with the level of prenatal cocaine exposure, leaving an indelible mark on the early chapters of life.

As researchers delve deeper into the layers of this narrative, the mosaic of findings begins to reveal patterns that transcend the confines of individual studies. The threads of influence—subtle yet enduring—link prenatal cocaine exposure to the intricate fabric of infant development. The implications are manifold, carrying the message that every decision, every choice, is woven into the larger tapestry of human development. In this narrative, the echoes of prenatal exposure resound as a call for vigilance, awareness, and renewed efforts to safeguard the fragile beginnings of life.

Follow-Up Risk

The ramifications of prenatal exposure to maternal smoking, alcohol, and cocaine use extend beyond the gestational period, casting a shadow on long-term neurobehavioral and cognitive outcomes. In the unfolding saga of human development, this chapter is marked by the emergence of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, diminished cognitive functioning, and learning deficits (Huizink & Mulder, 2006). Yet, the plot is not as simple as a linear cause-and-effect narrative.

As the storyline progresses, it becomes apparent that the teratogenic impact of prenatal exposure intertwines with the web of developmental risks inherent in being raised by a substance-abusing parent. The layers of influence are complex, with maternal substance use serving as a marker for broader social and psychological challenges within the childrearing environment. It’s as if the threads of teratogenic impact and environmental adversity are woven together, creating a tapestry of potential adversity for the child. The context is vital—low socioeconomic background, single parenthood, high stress levels, low social support, and parenting deficits—each contributing to the unfolding narrative.

Consider the poignant scene painted by Schuetze, Eiden, and Dombkowski (2006), where maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy casts a shadow of insensitivity and reduced affection in the interactions with newborns. This is a chapter characterized by anxiety and hostility, further darkening the storyline. Similarly, Tronick and colleagues (2005) sketch a somber picture, revealing diminished engagement and negative interactions between infants and mothers who used cocaine during pregnancy. The brushstrokes depict a dynamic interplay between teratogenic risk and the quality of parent-child interaction.

In this intricate narrative, the plot demands a more nuanced approach. A straightforward explanation of teratogenic risk and its subsequent effects falls short. The research landscape calls for sophistication, for delving deeper into the labyrinth of relations between prenatal substance exposure and multifaceted environmental risk factors. As the narrative unfolds, the focus shifts beyond the type, timing, and quantity of substance exposure, encompassing the intricate dance between teratogenic risk and the childrearing environment (Bendersky et al., 2006; Mayes, 2002).

Gender emerges as a subplot, revealing disparities in the impact of prenatal substance exposure. The script reveals that male and female neonates respond differently—autonomic regulation is more vulnerable in males, subject to the sway of maternal smoking and secondhand smoke (Schuetze & Eiden, 2006b). The tale grows more complex, as prenatal cocaine exposure leaves its mark on language development in preschool-age girls, while influencing boys’ frustration reactivity and aggressive behavior (Beeghly et al., 2006; Bendersky et al., 2006; Dennis et al., 2006). The interplay between teratogenic risk factors and child characteristics—such as sex and temperament—adds layers to the unfolding story.

Amidst the shadows, glimpses of resilience emerge. Some children weather the storm, adapting positively and experiencing healthy development. This subplot speaks to the power of resilience, casting rays of hope on a narrative otherwise fraught with challenges. As the story continues to evolve, it becomes clear that understanding the risks of prenatal teratogen exposure is only part of the tale. Investigating the protective factors that shield against adversity is a storyline that deserves attention (Dennis et al., 2006). In this multidimensional narrative, the weaving of teratogenic impact, environmental risks, and individual characteristics creates a rich tapestry, capturing the intricate dynamics of human development in its many shades and hues.


Brain Development

Formation and Growth of the Brain

The orchestration of brain development begins its intricate composition surprisingly early, commencing during the prenatal journey and proceeding through a symphony of processes and stages. The overture to this grand performance unfolds during the second half of the first month of gestation, as the neural plate takes shape through the magic of neural induction. This evolving structure transforms into a tube, a process known as neurulation, with one end destined to become the brain and the other the spinal cord. The narrative of neural tube development carries implications; any discordant notes can lead to anatomical abnormalities in either the brain or the spinal cord (Couperus & Nelson, 2006).

As the symphony progresses, the next movement centers on the creation of neurons, the carriers of information within this intricate ensemble. The brain houses billions of these performers, and their proliferation commences in the neural tube at five weeks of gestation, crescendoing to its zenith at three to four months, and finally reaching a harmonious conclusion by the end of the second trimester. At the peak, several hundred thousand new cells are birthed every minute, a staggering manifestation of creativity. These fledgling neurons undergo a transformative journey, transitioning from uncommitted entities to specialized performers as they navigate to their designated destinations within specific brain regions. This migration commences at six weeks of gestation and dances on through four to five months after birth (Nelson, de Haan, & Thomas, 2006).

As the symphony reaches its middle notes, individual neurons continue their symphonic transformation. Each neuron comprises a cell body, along with two extensions—axons and dendrites—bringing to life the fundamental role of these performers: processing and transmitting information. Axons transmit messages outward, while dendrites reach out to receive signals from their fellow performers. While the proliferation and migration of these neuronal talents largely unfolds in the prenatal act, the production and maturation of axons and dendrites commence their melodic journey at 15 weeks of gestation, carrying their melodies into the realm of postnatal existence. In certain brain regions, dendrites continue their musical growth for the first two years after birth, an ongoing refrain of development. Yet, amidst this symphonic crescendo, a subtle counterpoint emerges—neurons are not just brought into being; they are also laid to rest through a harmonious process known as apoptosis, or programmed cell death. It’s as if the composition demands an equilibrium, a delicate balance between birth and farewell (Buss, Sun, & Oppenheim, 2006; Couperus & Nelson, 2006; Nelson et al., 2006).

In this intricate symphony, connections materialize, as axons and dendrites intertwine to form synapses—bridges allowing for the transmission of information between neurons. A robust, harmonious brain thrives on its vast network of these connections. The first inklings of these synaptic harmonies emerge by 23 weeks of gestation, reaching their zenith at the close of the inaugural year after birth. The melody of synaptogenesis resonates until the adolescent movement. The score reveals that this early symphony produces nearly 40 percent more synapses than adults carry—a testament to the youthful exuberance of brain development. Yet, even in this symphonic masterpiece, a theme of refinement plays out—excessive synapses are pruned away, akin to a conductor refining the orchestral arrangement. Different brain regions hit their crescendos at varying tempos, with some reaching maturity in synapse numbers by the tender age of two, while others linger in this developmental crescendo until the cusp of adolescence. The key to this rhythmic pruning lies in the level of inter-neuronal communication, with active synapses fortified and inactive ones gently pruned away. This dance between growth and refinement shapes the symphonic tapestry (Nelson et al., 2006).

In the final movement of this symphony, the process of myelination takes center stage. Myelin, a fatty conductor, adorns and shields axons, conducting signals with swiftness and efficiency. The overture to myelination commences during the last trimester of gestation, and its melodic journey persists in select brain regions, resonating into the realms of young adulthood or even middle age. This process of myelination completes the symphony, ensuring that the orchestra of the brain performs its opus with precision and grace (Kagan & Herschkowitz, 2005; Nelson et al., 2006).

The composition of brain development, an intricate symphony of neural plate formations, neuron proliferations, dendritic maturation, synaptic harmonies, and myelin crescendos, draws to a close. A multifaceted symphony of growth, refinement, and maturation, this narrative orchestrates the masterpiece of human brain development.

Plasticity of the Brain

In a mere span of seven months, a cluster of cells orchestrates an astonishing transformation, culminating in the emergence of the adult brain’s intricate architecture, complete with six layers of cortex. Formerly, brain development was thought to be a genetic script playing out on an unchanging timeline. However, recent revelations unveil a more intricate narrative, where genetics and environment engage in a dance of influence. Beyond the establishment of anatomical structures and neural connections, the brain embarks on an ongoing dialogue with itself and its surroundings, setting the stage for a phenomenon known as plasticity. This concept encapsulates the brain’s remarkable capacity to adapt, to reshape itself in response to internal changes and external stimuli. While prenatal neural connectivity evolves through internal activity, postnatally, the environment takes the lead. The brain is a canvas for experience, both within and beyond its confines, with plasticity as its brush, crafting its portrait.

The orchestra of brain plasticity commences with the prenatal overture—a symphony of internal spontaneous activity altering neural connections. Yet, postnatally, the score pivots towards the environment’s melody. Diseases, metabolic imbalances, malnutrition, and trauma may etch maladaptive changes in the brain’s narrative. Conversely, learning and practice craft adaptive verses. It’s a symphony of intricate interactions, where one note ripples through the composition, influencing harmonies afar. Indeed, neural systems intertwine, their patterns malleable, adapting to the symphony of experience. A tapestry woven by cascading influences, where exposure to certain experiences resculpts the brain’s architecture, setting the stage for the emergence of subsequent changes. Prenatal exposure to speech paves the way for linguistic rhythms, sculpting the ability to extract words from the melodic tide of language (Werker & Tees, 2005).

The canvas of brain plasticity also reveals stark contrasts—the absence of sensory input leaving its mark. Profoundly deaf children, equipped with cochlear implants before age two, compose symphonies of improved speech recognition and production, contrasting with their peers who received implants later (Geers, 2006; Nicholas & Geers, 2006; Rubinstein, 2002). The chiaroscuro of plasticity becomes more vivid as we glimpse the shadowy side—the repercussions of disrupted neural connections. Middle ear infections, like discordant notes, interfere with sound transmission, leaving phonetic categorization stumbling, reading faltering, and spelling stumbling (Werker & Tees, 2005).

Plasticity’s resonance resonates across developmental landscapes, reverberating with implications for early intervention. The symphony is not just a preordained composition; it’s a masterpiece in progress, open to influence, to refinement. Devices like cochlear implants act as virtuoso instruments, aiding in the preservation and reshaping of neural structures. Lost connections, once unraveled, can be rewoven. Understanding how experience shapes brain development—its timbre, timing, and intensity—unlocks a symphony of intervention possibilities. The melody of normalcy can be recalibrated, the crescendo of deviation diverted. The brain’s plasticity narrates a story of adaptation, a symphony in which experience’s echoes shape the crescendo of development.

Functional Brain Development

Traditionally, the tapestry of developmental changes in sensory, motor, cognitive, and language realms was attributed to the gradual maturation of distinct brain regions or pathways. However, the latest symphony of research paints a more intricate canvas. Postnatal brain development, particularly within the cerebral cortex, is a narrative of interplay—regions and pathways collaborating to compose the symphony of functions (Johnson, 2000). This evolving perspective unveils an interactive specialization—a choreography of interactions yielding specialization over time.

In this interactive specialization ballet, cortical regions and pathways pirouette together, their coordinated performances refining their roles. The overture to specialization begins with a recruitment process—a response to environmental cues like a mother’s visage. As these regions and pathways engage in a pas de deux, a narrative emerges. With each interaction, they refine their responsiveness to specific stimuli, becoming virtuosos of particular experiences. For instance, six-month-olds exhibit the ability to differentiate between human and monkey faces. Yet, this capacity evolves—by nine months, they excel at discerning human faces while monkey faces blur into the backdrop (Pascalis, de Haan, & Nelson, 2002).

The stage of functional brain development becomes a dynamic tableau—a tapestry woven not by solitary threads but by interactive patterns. The symphony is one of coalescence, where cortical regions and pathways harmonize through their encounters with the world. In this intricate dance, specialization emerges, transforming the once-undifferentiated brain into an ensemble of responsive virtuosos. The narrative of functional development is no longer a linear progression but a dynamic interplay, with each note of interaction refining the symphony’s composition.


Recent strides in research have cast a new light on the sculpting of human brains, even beyond their early stages of development. It is now clear that plasticity—the responsiveness of neurons to experience—extends its tendrils through the postnatal period. But this is no mere passive dance; it is a dynamic symphony of genes, brain, and behavior in intricate choreography (Couperus & Nelson, 2006; Johnson, 2000).

This complex interplay unfolds as an activity-dependent process. The canvas of brain development is painted by the strokes of both external environmental factors and the unique genetic blueprint. Together, they craft the architecture of the brain, the very essence that shapes behavior. Yet, this is not a one-way street; behavior feeds back into the narrative, sculpting both the structural and functional contours of the brain.

While we have sketched a portrait of brain growth and structure, the link between these transformations and behavioral expression remains a tantalizing enigma. This uncharted territory beckons for exploration, offering a realm where laboratories employ the canvas of noninvasive neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging to capture the interplay of brains in action (Amso & Casey, 2006). But beyond the empirical brushstrokes, a computational canvas emerges—where statistical modeling stitches together the fabric of neural structure and behavioral function (Munakata, 2004). In this ever-evolving masterpiece, the fusion of these two realms unravels the secrets of behavioral development, weaving the threads of brain and behavior into a tapestry of discovery.

Visual and Auditory Experience

The captivating world of infant perceptions has been illuminated through ingenious methodologies that circumvent the challenge of verbal communication. Researchers have artfully employed a spectrum of techniques, ranging from the elementary to the intricate, to fathom the perceptual experiences of newborns and infants. These methodologies, like versatile tools in the hands of skilled artisans, have included everything from the straightforward—like the habituation and preferential looking paradigms—to the intricately woven anticipatory head-turning responses to conditioned stimuli, or the sophisticated orchestration of operant stimuli through high-amplitude sucking control.

One particular gem among these methodologies is the concept of dishabituation—a strategy built upon infants’ inherent proclivity for novelty. As these tiny learners grow accustomed to a stimulus, their subsequent resurgence of attention to a new stimulus reveals their ability to discriminate between the two. Yet, while this approach yields rich insights, a subtle tension can arise when novelty collides with the pull of an engaging follow-up stimulus, potentially coloring the interpretations.

In contrast, techniques founded on differential responsiveness or preferences provide a nuanced understanding of infants’ behavior in the face of competing stimuli. By scrutinizing their gaze shifts and reactions, researchers unearth the gems of preference, hinting that infants harbor not just an ability to distinguish but also an inclination towards certain experiences over others. Still, in cases where overt differences in behavior might elude detection, the deceptive guise of non-discrimination can settle in. In such instances, a shrewd investigation into the realm of physiology—where patterns of electrical brain activity like evoked potentials are examined—dissolves the illusion, revealing subtle variations and hidden depths in their perceptual world.


The world of visual perception in infants undergoes a fascinating transformation during the initial months of life. Neonatal vision, while brimming with potential, is characterized by developmental constraints arising from the immaturity of both the brain’s structural components (such as the optic nerve and visual cortex) and the eyes themselves (including lens muscles and retinal cones). Consequently, newborns’ visual acuity is remarkably limited, with their initial ability comparable to approximately 20/600 vision. However, this visual acuity gradually refines as they progress through their first six to eight months, ultimately approaching the crisp clarity of adult-like 20/20 vision (Kellman & Arterberry, 2006; Slater, 2004).

In the realm of color perception, newborns exhibit some limitations in discriminating colors. Although they possess the capacity for color vision from birth, their ability to differentiate a wide array of colors develops around the age of two to three months (Kellman & Arterberry, 2006; Schiffman, 2000). Tracking slowly moving objects is within the newborns’ grasp, yet their interpretation of three-dimensional space remains distinct from that of adults. Nonetheless, rudimentary depth perception can be detected during the early weeks, drawing upon kinetic cues (Nanez & Yonas, 1994). The sensitivity to binocular depth cues emerges between three to five months (Birch, 1993), followed by the utilization of pictorial and monocular cues around seven months (Yonas, Elieff, & Arterberry, 2002).

The intricacies of visual perception in infants stem from the interplay between acuity and contrast sensitivity. Newborns’ ability to discern patterns and forms is best demonstrated when stimuli are in close proximity and offer stark contrast, which avoids losing details in fine-grained elements. This predilection for high contrast, coupled with a preference for configurations featuring upper-half or top-heavy elements, contributes to their apparent fondness for faces (Macchi Cassia, Turati, & Simion, 2004; Turati, 2004). While newborns initially concentrate on outer contours during their visual scans, a shift toward internal details takes place by two months, prompting a preference for intact faces over scrambled ones. This shift in scanning patterns leads to changes in focal cues, as observed in the shift from focusing on head shape to facial features. This phenomenon encourages the distinction and preference for the maternal face (Pascalis et al., 1995).

As visual acuity improves and scanning strategies evolve, infants gradually unravel the complexity of patterns, discern subtle variations between faces (such as similar emotional expressions), and even exhibit a preference for aesthetically appealing faces (Kellman & Arterberry, 2006; Slater, 2004; Slater & Johnson, 1999). An intricate blueprint for human faces, constructed through experience, takes shape over the first nine months of life, enabling increasingly nuanced distinctions (Pascalis et al., 2002). Nonetheless, the precise origins and intricate interplay of factors underlying these observed facial preferences continue to beckon further exploration (Slater, 2004).


The realm of auditory development in infants displays a surprising level of sophistication even from birth (Fernald, 2004). While newborns may be less responsive to soft sounds compared to adults, their auditory capabilities in other domains are noteworthy. Newborns possess the remarkable ability to localize sounds and effortlessly discern characteristics such as pitch, frequency, and loudness. Infants demonstrate a strong responsiveness to music and display sensitivity to aspects such as dissonance, melody, rhythm, and tempo (Trehub & Schellenberg, 1995; Zentner & Kagan, 1996, 1998). The human voice captures their attention remarkably, and from the moment of birth, they exhibit preferences based on exposure, favoring their mother’s voice, their native language, and even familiar passages from books (DeCasper & Fifer, 1980; DeCasper & Spence, 1986; Moon, Cooper, & Fifer, 1993).

Early infancy marks a period of impressive discrimination capabilities in the realm of human speech. Neonates possess the capacity to differentiate a wide range of qualities in human speech, such as prosody and phonemic categories (Aslin, Jusczyk, & Pisoni, 1998). Their innate ability to distinguish sounds across various languages exceeds that of adults. This intrinsic aptitude for speech perception serves as a foundation, readying them to learn any language they are exposed to. However, as infants approach around 8 months of age, they gradually begin to specialize in recognizing the unique sounds of their native language. By the time they reach 12 months, their auditory abilities closely resemble those of the adults within their cultural environment (Aslin et al., 1998; Werker & Desjardins, 1995).

Cognitive Development

Piaget’s Viewpoint

Jean Piaget’s theory significantly shaped psychologists’ understanding of infant and child cognition. His constructivist viewpoint proposed that individuals, regardless of age, actively construct knowledge in response to their experiences rather than relying solely on direct instruction (Piaget, 1950, 1952, 1964, 1970). Piaget’s theory is centered on the idea that the fundamental units of knowledge are mental structures called schemes, which are created to interpret and represent experiences. The process of assimilation involves using existing schemes to make sense of new experiences, while accommodation involves modifying or creating new schemes to adapt to novel situations (Beilin, 1992). According to Piaget, the organization of knowledge into structured patterns leads to distinct developmental stages that represent qualitatively different ways of understanding the world. Although cognitive advancement is driven by assimilation and accommodation, Piaget also acknowledged the role of maturation in bringing about major shifts in cognitive development.

Piaget’s sensorimotor stage, spanning from birth to around two years of age, emphasizes the importance of infants’ sensory and motor abilities in shaping their perceptions and understanding of the environment. He proposed six substages within this stage, reflecting the infant’s progression from reflexive actions to more reflective cognitive processes. At the beginning, infants’ thinking and behavior are closely intertwined, as their cognitive structures are primarily sensorimotor in nature. Early on, infants do not think about objects separately from their actions or perceptions. This integration is evident in the initial three substages:

  1. Reflex activity (0–1 month): Infants use and modify inborn reflexes in their interactions with the environment.
  2. Primary circular reactions (1–4 months): Infants repeat and integrate more complex actions involving their own bodies.
  3. Secondary circular reactions (4–8 months): Infants repeat and integrate interesting actions on objects.

The pinnacle of the sensorimotor stage is the transition to symbolic capacity, which entails the ability to represent objects, actions, and experiences through mental imagery, words, or gestures. This shift becomes gradually apparent in the remaining three substages:

  1. Coordination of secondary schemes (8–12 months): Infants intentionally combine actions to solve simple problems.
  2. Tertiary circular reactions (12–18 months): Infants actively experiment with objects through trial and error to solve problems or explore potential uses.
  3. Symbolic problem solving (18–24 months): Infants mentally experiment with ideas rather than relying solely on trial and error.

Piaget’s theory offers valuable insights into how infants progress from basic sensory-motor interactions to more sophisticated cognitive processes, paving the way for subsequent developmental stages.

In Piaget’s theory, the sensorimotor stage concludes with infants achieving the ability to mentally represent objects and actions on those objects. This transition marks a departure from the earlier stage where infants primarily relied on “thinking-by-doing.” A significant aspect of this transition is the development of object permanence, which is the understanding that objects continue to exist even when they are not directly perceived or acted upon. Piaget proposed that infants lack object permanence until substage four (8–12 months), at which point they can supposedly form and maintain mental representations of objects.

According to Piaget, prior to substage four, infants do not possess a full grasp of object permanence. Their inability to represent objects in their minds explains behaviors like search errors—instances where infants look for hidden objects in incorrect locations. These errors are thought to persist until the final substage of the sensorimotor stage.

However, Piaget’s theory has been subject to criticism and challenges. One broad criticism concerns the lack of clarity regarding the role of maturational brain changes and experiences in driving the development of new competencies and the progression between stages. More specifically, Piaget’s understanding of infant cognition has been criticized for relying solely on search behaviors to assess infants’ grasp of object permanence, which may underestimate their capacity for representational thought.

Renee Baillargeon’s research, particularly her work involving measures of infants’ visual attention to unexpected events, brought new insights to the understanding of object permanence. Her findings challenged Piaget’s views by suggesting that infants might possess a more advanced understanding of object permanence than previously thought. This research marked the beginning of a wave of studies that have produced findings that deviate from traditional Piagetian propositions, further complicating our understanding of infant cognition (Meltzoff, 1999).

Modern Viewpoints

Classical Piagetian theory no longer serves as the primary framework guiding contemporary research in infant cognition. Instead, various competing theories are being debated and explored by researchers, leading to a more nuanced understanding of how infants perceive and interact with the world (Meltzoff, 1999; Meltzoff & Moore, 1994).

  1. Nativist Perspective: The nativist perspective encompasses theories that propose infants are born with innate knowledge about the physical world and possess symbolic abilities from the earliest months of life. This perspective argues that while maturation and experience contribute to further development, not all knowledge needs to be actively constructed by the infant. Instead, infants are evolutionarily adapted with cognitive representation abilities that enable a basic understanding of concepts such as object permanency, solidity, and containment. This viewpoint aligns with research showing that infants have some level of understanding of the physical world from an early age (Aguiar & Baillargeon, 1998; Baillargeon, Kotovsky, & Needham, 1995; Spelke, 1991).
  2. “Theory” Theorists: This perspective also acknowledges that infants possess innate knowledge or theories about how the world works. However, proponents of this view argue that these innate ideas are primitive and constantly updated as infants test and revise their predictions based on their experiences. While infants do have more inherent knowledge than Piaget suggested, this viewpoint agrees with the notion that infants actively construct knowledge as they interact with the world and modify their basic beliefs to better fit their experiences (Gopnick & Meltzoff, 1997; Meltzoff, 1999).
  3. Connectionist View: In contrast to the previous perspectives, the connectionist view argues against the idea of domain-specific core knowledge in infants. Instead, this view posits that infants’ thinking is akin to computer-like artificial neural networks that have the ability to learn. Cognitive processes such as forming concepts and problem-solving are understood as emerging from feedback mechanisms that modify the strength of connections between basic information-processing units. Changes in these connections precede observable behavioral changes, leading to the development of stage-like competencies from a few fundamental skills or constraints (McClelland & Jenkins, 1991).

These alternative perspectives, among others, are generating significant research attention and challenging the traditional Piagetian framework. However, it’s important to note that no single modern perspective has achieved dominant theoretical prominence. The ongoing debates and explorations within these perspectives continue to shape our understanding of how infants perceive, learn, and interact with their environment.


Temperament refers to the relatively consistent and stable individual differences in how infants react to and regulate their emotions and behavior. These differences are believed to be genetically and biologically based and become evident from the early months of life (Rothbart & Bates, 1998). While temperament serves as the foundation for later personality development, there is ongoing debate among researchers about how best to describe and measure these initial temperamental dimensions. Additionally, the long-term stability of temperament and the specific environmental factors that shape and modify these attributes over time remain areas of inquiry.

The pioneering work of Alexander Thomas and Stella Chess (1977) laid the groundwork for understanding infant temperament by proposing a classification model based on parental interviews. They identified three categories of infants based on behavioral and emotional characteristics: “easy,” “difficult,” and “slow-to-warm-up.” Easy infants adapted readily to new experiences, exhibited positive emotions, and established regular routines. Difficult infants were characterized by intense and frequent negative reactions to novelty, while slow-to-warm-up infants displayed mild negative responses to new experiences and adapted slowly. Although many infants did fit into these categories, a significant portion did not, highlighting the complexity of temperament (Thomas & Chess, 1986).

Contemporary researchers have identified several dimensions that capture differences in initial temperament. These dimensions include irritability (frustration/anger), fearful distress, positive affect, activity level, attention span, persistence, and rhythmicity (Rothbart & Bates, 1998). Other dimensions like sociability, agreeableness/adaptability, and effortful control have also been recognized (Buss & Plomin, 1984; Rothbart, 2004). Effortful control refers to an infant’s ability to regulate their reactivity, inhibit impulses, control arousal, and shift attention. Some temperamental dimensions emerge earlier than others but are still believed to have biological roots.

It’s important to note that while there are common dimensions used to describe temperament, the terminology and classifications can vary among researchers. Furthermore, the understanding of temperament has evolved over time, and ongoing research seeks to refine our knowledge of this complex and fundamental aspect of infant development.

In the study of temperament, researchers have employed various methods of measurement to capture the individual differences in infants’ reactivity and self-regulation. Verbal reports, primarily from parents, have been commonly used as they provide information about infants’ behavior across different situations. However, these reports can be influenced by factors like the parent’s emotional state, limited points of comparison, and expectations. Laboratory observations of infants’ behavior during specific contexts or tasks have also been utilized to provide more objective data. These observations can be complemented by physiological measures such as heart rate, cortisol levels, and brain wave patterns, which offer insights into the biological underpinnings of temperament. Each measurement approach has its advantages and disadvantages, and using a combination of methods (multimethod approach) is considered the most comprehensive way to understand temperament (Rothbart & Bates, 1998).

While there is general agreement that temperamental characteristics show some continuity during infancy, the long-term stability of temperament is considered to be moderate at best. Certain dimensions of temperament appear to be more stable, especially when an infant’s rating is extreme. For example, infants classified as “inhibited” due to extreme fearfulness and reactivity often maintain these characteristics into childhood and adolescence. Other dimensions like irritability, positive affect, activity level, and sociability also show some stability. However, predicting later personality based on early temperament is not highly accurate, as many individuals show changes over time, particularly those who do not exhibit extreme temperamental traits.

The interaction between genetics and environmental factors plays a significant role in the development of temperament. Genetic predispositions can set boundaries for the range of possible behavioral outcomes, while environmental factors, such as parenting practices, can influence the expression of these traits. For instance, caregivers who provide patient support to an inhibited infant can help reduce the child’s tendency toward heightened arousal and withdrawal, but this child is unlikely to become completely fearless. The interplay between environmental features, socialization practices, and specific temperamental characteristics is an ongoing area of research.

Overall, while researchers have made strides in understanding infant temperament and its influence on later development, there is still much to learn about the complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and individual factors in shaping temperament traits and their stability over time.


Attachment is a fundamental aspect of an infant’s emotional and social development, representing the psychological bond they form with a primary caregiver. This bond is characterized by the infant’s desire to seek proximity to and obtain comfort from the attachment figure, especially in times of stress or distress. The concept of attachment was extensively studied by researchers like John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, leading to the development of attachment theory.

Attachment theory emphasizes the importance of the emotional relationship between infants and their caregivers in shaping the child’s later emotional, cognitive, and social development. The attachment bond is not just a physical connection but also involves the creation of mental representations that influence how the child perceives themselves, others, and their relationships.

Attachment develops through several phases:

  1. Preattachment Phase: This phase occurs from birth to around two to three months. Infants display general responsiveness to social stimuli and are not yet able to distinguish a primary caregiver from other individuals.
  2. Attachment in the Making Phase: Between three to six to seven months, infants start showing preference and ease of responsiveness towards familiar caregivers. They become more socially oriented and begin to recognize their primary caregiver.
  3. Clear-Cut Attachment Phase: From around seven months to three years, infants actively seek proximity to their primary caregiver, using them as a secure base from which to explore their environment. Separation and stranger anxieties become evident during this stage, reflecting the child’s attachment bond.

Separation anxiety refers to the distress and anxiety an infant experiences when separated from their attachment figure. It typically starts around six to eight months and peaks around 18 months. Stranger anxiety involves the wariness and apprehension infants display when confronted with unfamiliar individuals. This anxiety tends to decrease as the child grows and becomes more familiar with different people.

Attachment theory has provided valuable insights into understanding the dynamics of infant-caregiver relationships and their influence on child development. Ainsworth’s “Strange Situation” experiment, which assesses an infant’s reaction to separations and reunions with their caregiver, has been a widely used method to classify attachment patterns. These patterns include secure attachment, insecure-avoidant attachment, and insecure-resistant attachment, each with distinct behavioral and emotional characteristics.

Attachment plays a significant role in shaping an infant’s emotional regulation, social interactions, and later relationships throughout their life. Researchers continue to study attachment dynamics, the impact of different attachment patterns, and the long-term implications for children’s emotional and psychological well-being.

The quality of attachment that infants form with their primary caregivers can have significant implications for their emotional and social development. Researchers have identified four main classifications of attachment styles based on infants’ behaviors during the “strange situation” procedure, which assesses their reactions to separations and reunions with their caregivers.

  1. Secure Attachment: Infants with a secure attachment style view their caregiver as a reliable and available source of comfort and security. They use the caregiver as a secure base for exploration and are able to seek comfort from them when needed. These infants show positive reactions upon reunion with the caregiver and readily engage in contact.
  2. Avoidant Attachment: Infants with an avoidant attachment style appear to downplay their need for closeness and often avoid contact with the caregiver upon reunion. They may seem indifferent to the caregiver’s presence and may not seek comfort from them, possibly due to caregiver rejection or unresponsiveness.
  3. Resistant Attachment: Infants with a resistant attachment style display ambivalent behavior towards the caregiver. They might be clingy and resist exploration, and they often exhibit anger or resistance when the caregiver returns after a separation. This style is often associated with inconsistent caregiver responsiveness.
  4. Disorganized Attachment: Disorganized attachment is a more recent classification that indicates a lack of consistent pattern in the infant’s behavior during the strange situation. Infants with disorganized attachment may display confusing or contradictory responses, freeze in place, or show signs of fear or alarm. This style is linked to caregiver behavior that is frightened or frightening to the child.

Attachment quality is believed to emerge based on how infants adapt to their caregiving environment. Secure attachments are fostered by caregivers who are sensitive, responsive, and attuned to the infant’s needs. Avoidant attachments may result from caregivers who are distant or rejective, while resistant attachments may arise from inconsistent caregiver responses. Disorganized attachments are often associated with caregivers who exhibit frightened or confusing behavior.

Infants’ attachment styles are initially flexible and can be influenced by changes in their caregiving environment. However, over time, repeated experiences with caregivers can lead to the development of more stable attachment patterns. These patterns form cognitive models that shape the child’s perceptions of themselves, others, and relationships. The attachment system and internal working model play a significant role in how infants interpret and respond to social interactions, and these early attachment experiences can have lasting effects on their emotional well-being and relationships as they grow older.

Numerous researchers in the field of developmental psychology have extensively explored the profound impact that attachment quality during infancy can exert on the overall development of young children. The significance of these early attachment experiences extends beyond the infancy stage and reverberates across various aspects of an individual’s life trajectory. Through rigorous investigations, a deeper understanding has emerged regarding the intricate interplay between infant attachment patterns and subsequent developmental outcomes.

One noteworthy area where the influence of infant attachment quality is vividly evident is in the emotional and behavioral domains of toddlers and preschoolers. A burgeoning body of research has revealed compelling associations between secure infant attachments and lower levels of fear and anger during the toddler and preschool years (Kochanska, 2001). Securely attached children tend to exhibit a greater sense of emotional security and self-regulation, which may contribute to their reduced manifestation of negative emotional states. This early emotional foundation appears to set the stage for more positive interactions with peers, as securely attached infants often demonstrate enhanced social skills and the ability to establish harmonious relationships with their peers during childhood (Rubin, Bukowski, & Parker, 2006; Schneider, Atkinson, & Tardiff, 2001). The thread of secure attachment, woven during the infancy phase, thus seems to extend its influence, shaping the fabric of social interactions in early childhood.

While the immediate effects of infant attachment quality are noteworthy, the ripple effect of these attachment patterns is evident across the developmental lifespan. An intriguing continuity has been observed between secure attachment in infancy and healthy romantic relationships in adolescence (Collins, Hennighausen, Schmit, & Sroufe, 1997). This suggests that the secure base established in the formative years of life fosters a sense of trust, emotional intimacy, and effective communication in future romantic partnerships. Furthermore, the echoes of early attachment experiences reverberate into adulthood, where individuals’ romantic attachment styles seem to mirror their attachment histories (Fraley, 2002). These findings underscore the enduring impact of infant attachment on the broader landscape of emotional relationships, transcending time and developmental stages.

Intriguingly, the circle of attachment comes full circle as individuals transition to parenthood themselves. Research has illuminated a connection between early attachment history and the quality of caregiving provided to one’s own offspring. Parents who have experienced secure attachments during their own childhood tend to exhibit greater sensitivity and responsiveness in their interactions with their children, thus fostering the creation of secure attachments in the next generation (van IJzendoorn, 1995). This intergenerational transmission of attachment underscores the dynamic interplay between individual attachment experiences and the caregiving behaviors that shape future attachment relationships.

However, amidst these enlightening findings, a complex web of factors contributes to the developmental tapestry of social functioning. While early attachment status has been associated with various dimensions of adolescent and adult social development, the relative contributions of primary attachment quality compared to subsequent parenting practices, family circumstances such as parental divorce, and peer relationships remain subjects of ongoing inquiry. The multifaceted nature of human development necessitates a comprehensive understanding of how these factors interplay to shape an individual’s social landscape.

Furthermore, the formation of multiple attachment relationships in infancy, in addition to the primary attachment figure, adds complexity to the narrative. As infants develop multiple bonds within a short timeframe, questions arise regarding the organization of these internal working models. The balance between hierarchical versus integrative or independent models of attachment relationships remains an area ripe for exploration. Similarly, unraveling the intricate dynamics of how these multiple attachment relationships collectively influence an individual’s long-term social development continues to stimulate scholarly investigation (Main, 1999).

The study of infant attachment quality has unveiled a captivating panorama of how early experiences can shape the developmental trajectory of an individual. From the toddler years to adolescence and adulthood, the enduring impact of secure attachments resonates through emotional regulation, peer relationships, romantic partnerships, and the transmission of caregiving practices. Yet, the story of attachment is far from complete, as researchers delve into the nuanced interplay between primary attachment, subsequent parenting, and various environmental factors that mold the intricate mosaic of human social development.


The period spanning from conception to the second birthday marks a remarkable phase of development encompassing various domains. Prenatally, the rapid formation of the brain occurs shortly after gestation initiation, culminating in the establishment of basic brain structure similar to that of adults. Neuronal proliferation peaks during this time, with axons, dendrites, and synaptic connections proliferating. Simultaneously, sensory systems mature, enabling perceptual responsiveness and habituation. By the final trimester, hearing becomes advanced enough to evoke preferences, such as recognizing the mother’s voice. Sleep-wake cycles and rest-activity patterns that mirror adult patterns also emerge. However, this prenatal period is susceptible to environmental teratogens, leading to physical, neurological, cognitive, and behavioral complications due to prenatal exposure to substances like tobacco, alcohol, and cocaine.

The subsequent two years after birth (ages 1 to 3) encompass an intense period of change, possibly more transformative than any subsequent 24-month interval. This phase witnesses peak synaptogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and the elimination of inactive neural elements. Symbolism takes center stage, evident through rudimentary language and pretend play, signifying the foundation of human thought processes. Cognitive development propels the two-year-old closer to adults in terms of thinking capabilities than to newborns. During infancy, nascent personality traits surface as temperamental behavioral tendencies. While experience can influence temperament, these inherent qualities shape interactions within social contexts. Importantly, this phase marks the initial bond between the seemingly asocial infant and caregivers, fostering subconscious models of human relationships. These cognitive representations develop rapidly, though they gradually become less malleable, exerting lasting effects on future social functioning.

The scope and pace of transformations in physical, cognitive, and psychosocial realms during prenatal and infancy phases are often astonishing. However, despite substantial knowledge, the full spectrum of abilities, changes, and associated challenges during these developmental periods remains incompletely understood. The intricacies of underlying mechanisms and the modulations attributed to experience are yet to be comprehensively elucidated. Similarly, the intricate web of interactions between these early phases and subsequent childhood and adulthood functioning warrants further exploration. As researchers continue to unveil new dimensions of understanding, the inquiry into the captivating world of early human development continues to captivate our curiosity


  1. Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (1998). Eight-and-a-half-month-old infants’ reasoning about containment events. Child Development, 69, 636–653.
  2. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1972). Attachment and dependency: A comparison. In J. L. Gewirtz (Ed.), Attachment and dependency. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston and Sons.
  3. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1973). The development of infant-mother attachment. In B. M. Caldwell & H. N. Ricciuti (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 3). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1979). Attachment as related to motherinfant interaction. In J. Rosenblatt, R. Hinde, C. Beer, & M. Busnel (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press.
  5. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. Amso, D., & Casey, B. J. (2006). Beyond what develops when neuroimaging may inform how cognition changes with development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 24–29.
  7. Aslin, R., Jusczyk, P., & Pisoni, D. (1998). Speech and auditory processing during infancy: Constraints on and precursors to language. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), D. Kuhn, & R. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
  8. Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 3 1/2- and 4 1/2-monthold infants. Developmental Psychology, 23, 655–664.
  9. Baillargeon, R., & DeVos, J. (1991). Object permanence in young infants: Further evidence. Child Development, 62, 1227–1246.
  10. Baillargeon, R., Kotovsky, L., & Needham, A. (1995). The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy. In G. Lewis, D. Premack, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Causal understandings in cognition and culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  11. Beeghly, M., Martin, B., Rose-Jacobs, R., Cabral, H., Heeren, T., Augustyn, M., et al. (2006). Prenatal cocaine exposure and children’s language functioning at 6 and 9.5 years: Moderating effects of child age, birthweight, and gender. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 98–115.
  12. Behnke, M., Eyler, F. D., Warner, T. D., Garvan, C. W., Hou, W., & Wobie, K. (2006). Outcome from a prospective, longitudinal study of prenatal cocaine use: Preschool development at 3 years of age. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 41–49.
  13. Beilin, H. (1992). Piaget’s enduring contribution to developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28, 191–204.
  14. Belsky, J., Spritz, B., & Crnic, K. (1996). Infant attachment security and affective-cognitive information processing at age 3. Psychological Science, 7, 111–114.
  15. Bendersky, M., Bennett, D., & Lewis, M. (2006). Aggression at age 5 as a function of prenatal exposure to cocaine, gender, and environmental risk. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 71–84.
  16. Birch, E. (1993). Stereopsis in infants and its developmental relation to visual acuity. In K. Simons (Ed.), Early visual development: Normal and abnormal (pp. 224–236). New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. I. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
  18. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation. New York: Basic Books.
  19. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss, sadness, and depression. New York: Basic Books.
  20. Bretherton, I. (1996). Internal working models of attachment relationships as related to resilient coping. In G. G. Noam & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development and vulnerability in close relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  21. Bretherton, I., Ridgeway, D., & Cassidy, J. (1990). The role of internal working models in the attachment relationship: Theoretical, empirical, and developmental considerations. In M. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  22. Buka, S. L., Shenassa, E. D., & Niaura, R. (2003). Elevated risk of tobacco dependence among offspring of mothers who smoked during pregnancy: A 30-year prospective study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(11), 1978–1984.
  23. Buss, A., & Plomin, R. (1984). Temperament: Early developing personality traits. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  24. Buss, R. R., Sun, W., & Oppenheim, R. W. (2006). Adaptive roles of programmed cell death during nervous system development. Annual review of neuroscience, 29, 1–35.
  25. Caspi, A. (1998). Personality development across the life course. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed.) New York: Wiley.
  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Alcohol consumption among women who are pregnant or who might become pregnant—United States, 2002. MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report), 53(50), 1178–1181.
  27. Collins, W. A., Hennighausen, K., Schmit, D., & Sroufe, L. A. (1997). Developmental precursors of romantic relationships: A longitudinal analysis. In S. Shulman & W. A. Collins (Eds.), Romantic relationships in adolescence: Developmental perspectives (pp. 69–84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  28. Couperus, J. W., & Nelson, C. A. (2006). Early brain development and plasticity. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of early childhood development (pp. 85–105). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  29. DeCasper, A., & Fifer, W. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science, 208, 1174–1176.
  30. DeCasper, A., & Spence, M. (1986). Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns’ perception of speech sounds. Infant Behavior and Development, 9, 133–150.
  31. Dennis, T., Bendersky, M., Ramsay, D., & Lewis, M. (2006). Reactivity and regulation in children prenatally exposed to cocaine. Developmental Psychology, 42, 688–697.
  32. de Vries, J. I. P., & Hopkins, B. (2005). Fetal movements and postures: What do they mean for postnatal development? In B. Hopkins & S. P. Johnson (Eds.), Prenatal development of postnatal functions (pp. 177–219). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  33. De Wolff, M., & van IJzendoorn, M. (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 66, 571–591.
  34. DiPietro, J. A. (2005). Neurobehavioral assessment before birth. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 11, 4–13.
  35. DiPietro, J. A., Caulfield, L. E., Irizarry, R. A., Chen, P., Merialdi, M., & Zavaleta, N. (2006). Prenatal development of intrafetal and maternal-fetal synchrony. Behavioral Neuroscience, 120, 687–701.
  36. DiPietro, J. A., Hodgson, D. M., & Costigan, K. A. (1996). Fetal neurobehavioral development. Child Development, 67, 2553–2567.
  37. Fernald, A. (2004). Auditory development in infancy. In G. Bremner & A. Fogel (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of infant development (pp. 35–70). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  38. Field, T. M. (1990). Infancy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  39. Flavell, J. H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  40. Fraley, R. (2002). Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: Meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 123–151.
  41. Fried, P. A. (2002). Conceptual issues in behavioral teratology and their application in determining long-term sequelae of prenatal marihuana exposure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 81–102.
  42. Gibson, C. L., Piquero, A. R., & Tibbetts, S. G. (2000). Assessing the relationship between maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and age at first police contact. Justice Quarterly, 17, 519–541.
  43. Gopnick, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  44. Howell, K. K., Lynch, M. E., Platzman, K. A., Smith, G. H., & Coles, C. D. (2006). Prenatal alcohol exposure and ability, academic achievement, and school functioning in adolescence: A longitudinal follow-up. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 116–126.
  45. Huizink, A. C., & Mulder, E. J. H. (2006). Maternal smoking, drinking or cannabis use during pregnancy and neurobehavioral and cognitive functioning in human offspring. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 24–41.
  46. Huotilainen, M., Kujala, A., & Hotakainen, M. (2005). Shortterm memory functions of the human fetus recorded with magnetoencephalography. Neuroreport, 16, 81–84.
  47. Jacobson, S. W., & Jacobson, J. L. (2001). Alcohol and drugrelated effects of development: A new emphasis on contextual factors. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 416–430.
  48. Isabella, R. (1993). Origins of attachment: Maternal interactive behavior across the first year. Child Development, 64, 605–621.
  49. James, D., Pillai, M., & Smoleniec, J. (1995). Neurobehavioral development in the human fetus. In J. Lecanuet, W. P. Fifter, M. A. Krasnegor, & W. P. Smotherman (Eds.), Fetal development: A psychobiological perspective (pp. 101–128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  50. Johnson, M. H. (2000). Functional brain development in infants: Elements of an integrative specialization framework. Child Development, 71, 75–81.
  51. Johnson, S. P. (2003). The nature of cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 102–114.
  52. Kagan, J. (1998). Biology and the child. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
  53. Kagan, J., & Fox, N. (2006). Biology, culture, and temperamental biases. In W. Damon, R. Lerner (Series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.
  54. Kagan, J., & Herschkowitz, N. (2005). A young mind in a growing brain. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  55. Kellman, P., & Arterberry, M. (2006). Infant visual perception. In W. Damon, R. Lerner (Series Eds.), D. Kuhn, & R. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.
  56. Kochanska, G. (2001). Emotional development in children with different attachment histories: The first three years. Child Development, 72, 474–490.
  57. Lecanuet, J. P., Granier-Deferre, C., & Busnel, M. C. (1995). Human fetal auditory perception. In J. Lecanuet, W. P. Fifter, M. A. Krasnegor, & W. P. Smotherman (Eds.), Fetal development: A psychobiological perspective (pp. 239–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  58. Lourenco, O., & Machado, A. (1996). In defense of Piaget’s theory: A reply to 10 common criticisms. Psychological Review, 103, 143–164.
  59. Lyons-Ruth, K., Melnick, S., Bronfman, E., Sherry, S., & Llanas, L. (2004). Hostile-helpless relational models and disorganized attachment patterns between parents and their young children: Review of research and implications for clinical work. In L. Atkinson & S. Goldberg (Eds.), Attachment issues in psychopathology and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  60. Macchi Cassia, V., Turati, C., & Simion, F. (2004). Can a nonspecific bias toward top-heavy patterns explain newborns’ face preference? Psychological Science, 15(6), 379–383.
  61. Main, M. (1991). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) versus multiple (incoherent) models of attachment. Findings and directions for future research. In C. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde, & P. Marris (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp. 127–159). London: Routledge.
  62. Main, M. (1999). Attachment theory: Eighteen points with suggestions for future studies. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment (pp. 845–887). New York: Guilford Press.
  63. Main, M., & Hess, E. (1990). Parents’ unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status: Is frightened or frightening behavior the linking mechanism? In M. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  64. Main, M., & Soloman, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In M. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  65. Mayes, L. C. (2002). A behavioral teratogenic model of the impact of prenatal cocaine exposure on arousal regulatory systems. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 24, 385–395.
  66. McClelland, J. L., & Jenkins, E. (1991). Nature, nurture, and connections: Implications of connectionist models for cognitive development. In K. VanLehn (Ed.), Architectures for intelligence: The twenty-second Carnegie Mellon symposium on cognition (pp. 41–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  67. Miller, P. H. (2002). Theories of developmental psychology (4th ed.). New York: Worth.
  68. Meltzoff, A. (1999). Origins of theory of mind, cognition and communication. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32, 251–269.
  69. Meltzoff, A., & Moore, M. (1994). Imitation, memory, and the representations of persons. Infant Behavior and Development, 17, 83–89.
  70. Montreaux, M. C., Blacker, D., & Biederman, J. (2006). Maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring overt and covert conduct problems: a longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 883–890.
  71. Moon, C., Cooper, R. P., & Fifer, W. (1993). Two-day-old infants prefer their native language. Infant Behavior and Development, 16, 495–500.
  72. Munakata, Y. (2004). Computational cognitive neuroscience of early memory development. Developmental Review, 24, 133–153.
  73. Nanez, J., & Yonas, A. (1994). Effects of luminance and texture motion on infant defensive reactions to optical collision. Infant Behavior and Development, 17, 165–174.
  74. Nelson, C. A. (1999). Neural plasticity and human development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 42–45.
  75. Nelson, C. A., de Haan, M., & Thomas, K. M. (2006). Neuroscience of cognitive development: The role of experience and the developing brain. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
  76. O’Connor, M. J., & Paley, B. (2006). The relationship of prenatal alcohol exposure and the postnatal environment to child depressive symptoms. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 50–64.
  77. Pascalis, O., de Haan, M., & Nelson, C. A. (2002). Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science, 296, 1321–1323.
  78. Pascalis, O., DeSchonen, S., Morton, J., Deruelle, C., & Fabregrenet, M. (1995). Mother’s face recognition by neonate: A replication and extension. Infant Behavior and Development, 18, 79–85.
  79. Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  80. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
  81. Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. In R. Ripple & V. Rockcastle (Eds.), Piaget rediscovered. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  82. Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 703- 732). New York: Wiley.
  83. Putnam, S. P., Sanson, A. V., & Rothbart, M. K. (2002). Child temperament and parenting. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 1. Children and parenting (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  84. Robinson, S. R., & Kleven, G. A. (2005). Learning to move before birth. In B. Hopkins & S. P. Johnson (Eds.), Prenatal development of postnatal functions (pp. 131–176). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  85. Rothbart, M. K. (2004). Temperament and the pursuit of an integrated developmental psychology. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 492–505.
  86. Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S., & Evans, D. (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 122–135.
  87. Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Temperament. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
  88. Rubin, K., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. Lerner (Series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.
  89. Scarr, S. (1992). Developmental theories for the 1990s: Development and individual differences. Child Development, 63, 1–19.
  90. Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype/environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.
  91. Schaal, B. (2005). From amnion to colostrums to milk: Odor bridging in early developmental transitions. In B. Hopkins & S. P. Johnson (Eds.), Prenatal development of postnatal functions (pp. 51–102). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  92. Schaal, B., Orgeur, P., & Rognon, C. (1995). Odor sensing in the human fetus: Anatomical functional, and chemoecological bases. In J. Lecanuet, W. P. Fifter, M. A. Krasnegor, & W. P. Smotherman (Eds.), Fetal development: A psychobiological perspective (pp. 205–23 7). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  93. Schaffer, R., & Emerson, P. (1964). The development of social attachments in infancy. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 29(3, Serial No. 94).
  94. Schiffman, H. R. (2000). Sensation and perception (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
  95. Schneider, B., Atkinson, L., & Tardiff, C. (2001). Child-parent attachment and children’s peer relations: A quantitative review. Developmental Psychology, 37, 86–100.
  96. Schuetze, P., & Eiden, R. D. (2006a). The association between maternal cocaine use during pregnancy and physiological regulation in 4- to 8-week-old infants: An examination of possible mediators and moderators. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 15–26.
  97. Schuetze, P., & Eiden, R. D. (2006b). The association between maternal smoking and secondhand exposure and autonomic functioning at 2-4 weeks of age. Infant Behavior and Development, 29, 32–43.
  98. Schuetze, P., Eiden, R. D., & Dombkowski, L. (2006). The association between cigarette smoking during pregnancy and maternal behavior during the neonatal period. Infancy, 10, 267–288.
  99. Slater, A. (2004). Visual perception. In G. Bremner & A. Fogel (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of infant development (pp. 5–34). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  100. Slater, A., & Johnson, S. (1999). Visual sensory and perceptual abilities of the newborn: Beyond the blooming, bussing confusion. In A. Slater & S. Johnson (Eds.), The development of sensory, motor and cognitive capacities in early infancy (pp. 121–141). Hove, UK: Sussex Press.
  101. Spelke, E. (1991). Physical knowledge in infancy: Reflections on Piaget’s theory. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), Epigenesis of mind: Essays in biology and knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  102. Sroufe, L. A. (1977). Wariness of strangers and the study of infant development. Child Development, 48, 1184–1199.
  103. Sroufe, L. A. (1996). Emotional development: The organization of emotional life in the early years. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  104. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2005). Substance use during pregnancy: 2002 and 2003 update. Rockville, MD: Author.
  105. Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
  106. Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1986). The New York longitudinal study: From infancy to early adult life. In R. Plomin & J. Dunn (Eds.), The study of temperament: Changes, continuities, and challenges. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  107. Thomas, A., Chess, S., & Birch, H. G. (1968). Temperament and behavior disorders in children. New York: New York University Press.
  108. Thompson, R., & Raikes, H. (2003). Toward the next quartercentury: Conceptual and methodological challenges for attachment theory. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 691–718.
  109. Trehub, S., & Schellenberg, E. (1995). Music: Its relevance to infants. Annals of Child Development, 11, 1–24.
  110. Tronick, E. Z., Messinger, D. S., Weinberg, M. K., Lester, B. M., LaGasse, L., Seifer, R., et al. (2005). Cocaine exposure is associated with subtle compromises of infants’ and mothers’ social-emotional behavior and dyadic features of their interaction in the face-to-face still-face paradigm. Developmental Psychology, 41, 711–722.
  111. Turati, C. (2004). Why faces are not special to newborns: An alternative account of the face preference. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 5–8.
  112. van IJzendoorn, M. (1995). Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant attachment: A metaanalysis on the predictive validity of the adult attachment interview. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 387–403.
  113. Waddington, C. (1966). Principles of development and differentiation. New York: Macmillan.
  114. Weinraub, M., & Lewis, M. (1977). The determinants of children’s responses to separation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 42(4, Serial No. 172).
  115. Werker, J., & Desjardins, R. (1995). Listening to speech in the first year of life: Experiential influences on phoneme perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 76–81.
  116. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (2005). Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Developmental Psychobiology, 46, 233–251.
  117. Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749–750.
  118. Yonas, A., Elieff, C., & Arterberry, M. (2002). Emergence of sensitivity to pictorial depth cues: Charting development in individual infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 495–514.
  119. Zappasodi, F., Tecchio, F., & Pizzella, V. (2001). Detection of fetal auditory evoked responses by means of magnetoencephalography. Brain Research, 917, 167–173.
  120. Zentner, M., & Kagan, J. (1996). Perception of music by infants. Nature, 383, 29.
  121. Zentner, M., & Kagan, J. (1998). Infants’ perception of consonance and dissonance in music. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 483–492.
  122. Zeskind, P. S., & Gingras, J. L. (2006). Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy disrupts rhythms in fetal heart rate. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 5–14.

Back to Developmental Psychology