Psychology in the Middle Ages




Medieval Psychology

The Middle Ages, often perceived through the lens of twentieth-century psychology, has been subject to conflicting interpretations that highlight both its limitations and its potential contributions to the understanding of human behavior. Early perspectives on this era often painted a grim picture, emphasizing the dominance of theology and a supposed opposition to scientific inquiry. However, more nuanced examinations by later historians of psychology have revealed a more complex landscape that challenges these earlier notions.

Academic Writing, Editing, Proofreading, And Problem Solving Services

Get 10% OFF with 24START discount code


  1. Twentieth-Century Views: In the early twentieth century, scholars like Edwin Boring and Gregory Zilboorg offered critical assessments of the Middle Ages’ approach to psychology. Boring, in his work “A History of Experimental Psychology,” criticized the late medieval emphasis on theology, which he believed hindered the development of scientific exploration in psychology. Zilboorg, in his “History of Medical Psychology,” contended that medical practitioners of the time shied away from in-depth investigations into psychological phenomena, attributing this hesitancy to societal beliefs about possession and witchcraft.
  2. Traditional Interpretations: Introductory texts of the time often reinforced the negative image of the Middle Ages by highlighting extreme cases of cruelty and mistreatment of the mentally ill. Claims were made that individuals with mental disorders were subject to torture or even execution due to the prevailing belief in possession by demons. These portrayals painted a bleak picture of the treatment of mental illness during this era.
  3. Reevaluation by Historians: As the twentieth century progressed, historians of psychology began to critically reexamine these assumptions. They found that while theological considerations played a significant role in shaping intellectual discourse, there was a richer tapestry of thought beneath the surface. Medieval philosophers, physicians, and theologians did engage in intricate debates about human behavior, often drawing from their religious foundations. These discussions laid the groundwork for later psychological theories, even though they might not have been systematically tested in an empirical manner.
  4. Complexity and Nuance: Historians have found that medieval thinkers explored questions related to the mind, consciousness, emotions, and ethical behavior. Notable figures like Thomas Aquinas grappled with topics such as the nature of the soul, the relationship between reason and faith, and the concept of free will. While empirical methodologies were not prevalent, the intellectual inquiries of the time laid the foundation for future psychological exploration.
  5. Emerging Sympathy: Later twentieth-century historians have adopted a more sympathetic view of the Middle Ages, acknowledging the context in which ideas about psychology emerged. They have highlighted the potential contributions of medieval thinkers, recognizing that the intellectual landscape was influenced by a complex interplay of cultural, philosophical, and religious factors.

In summary, while early twentieth-century perspectives painted the Middle Ages as a period marked by theological dominance and a lack of empirical inquiry, modern historians of psychology have offered a more nuanced understanding. The era’s thinkers engaged in rich discussions about human behavior, consciousness, and the mind, even though their approaches might not align with contemporary scientific methodologies. As historical interpretations continue to evolve, the Middle Ages now stand as a period that both posed challenges to psychological exploration and laid the groundwork for the emergence of psychological thought in subsequent centuries.

The Middle Ages

The Middle Ages, spanning from the fourth or fifth century CE to the middle or end of the fifteenth century CE, was a transformative era marked by significant political, economic, and intellectual changes. This approximately 1,000-year period witnessed shifts in various aspects of society, including thought and knowledge. In Western and Central Europe, particularly during the initial part of the Middle Ages until the eleventh century, this period is often referred to as the Dark Ages, characterized by a perceived intellectual stagnation following the collapse of the Roman Empire in the western regions and the disintegration of the Mediterranean world.

  1. Dark Ages and Intellectual Culture: The early portion of the Middle Ages, known as the Dark Ages, was marked by relative political and economic underdevelopment in comparison to the preceding Roman Empire. The fall of the Roman Empire led to a breakdown of established societal structures and institutions, creating an environment that hindered the growth of intellectual and cultural achievements.
  2. Impact on Intellectual Heritage: During this phase, there was a scarcity of surviving writings and limited intellectual activity. Many works of the ancient world, including those of renowned philosophers like Plato and Aristotle, were not widely read or preserved. The intellectual legacy of the Greco-Roman era appeared to diminish during this period, contributing to the perception of an impoverished intellectual culture.
  3. Sociopolitical Factors: The tumultuous political landscape of the early Middle Ages, characterized by fragmented kingdoms, invasions, and power struggles, played a significant role in shaping the intellectual climate. Sociopolitical instability often diverted attention and resources away from intellectual pursuits, contributing to the perceived lack of intellectual progress.
  4. Transition and Revival: The later Middle Ages witnessed shifts in this narrative. The eleventh century marked a turning point as European societies began to experience revitalization. This period saw the emergence of universities, which became centers of learning and intellectual exploration. The renewed focus on education and learning laid the foundation for the eventual revival of intellectual pursuits.
  5. Transmission of Knowledge: It is important to note that while the Western and Central European regions experienced a decline in intellectual activity during the early Middle Ages, other parts of the world, such as the Islamic world and Byzantine Empire, maintained and advanced intellectual traditions. The preservation and transmission of classical texts in these regions played a crucial role in preserving ancient knowledge.

In conclusion, the Middle Ages encompassed a diverse and evolving intellectual landscape that went through distinct phases. The Dark Ages of the early Middle Ages were marked by perceived intellectual decline, driven by the collapse of the Roman Empire and sociopolitical challenges. However, the subsequent centuries witnessed a transition and resurgence of intellectual pursuits, eventually leading to the establishment of universities and a renewed interest in learning. While the intellectual legacy of the Greco-Roman era appeared dormant during parts of the Middle Ages, its influence persisted and eventually contributed to the intellectual awakening of the Renaissance. Read more about The Middle Ages.

Medieval Psychology

While the formal discipline of psychology did not exist during the Middle Ages, the intellectual landscape of this era was far from devoid of psychological inquiries. Numerous medieval writers, particularly those in the thirteenth century, delved into topics that bear resemblance to contemporary psychological concerns. Among them, figures such as Avicenna and Albertus Magnus (1193-1280) stand out, displaying genuine interest in the realm of psychological theory. Exploring the writings of this period reveals the presence of two distinct psychological traditions: a medical tradition and a philosophical tradition, both rooted in the legacies of ancient thought.

  1. Interest in Psychological Exploration: Although the concept of psychology as a distinct field was not fully realized during the Middle Ages, certain scholars of the time demonstrated a keen interest in matters pertaining to the human psyche. Notably, figures like Avicenna and Albertus Magnus exhibited genuine curiosity and engagement with topics that hold relevance in modern psychology. Their writings and discussions provide glimpses into the early exploration of psychological concepts.
  2. Psychological Traditions: a) Medical Tradition: One significant stream of thought emerged from a medical perspective, tracing its roots back to ancient medical theories. Avicenna, a Persian polymath, physician, and philosopher, contributed to this tradition with his work on the interactions between the body and the mind. His explorations laid the groundwork for understanding the connections between physical and mental well-being.

b) Philosophical Tradition: Another notable avenue of thought emerged from a philosophical standpoint. Albertus Magnus, a renowned scholar of the Middle Ages, delved into philosophical inquiries that encompassed psychological considerations. His writings reflected a blend of theology, philosophy, and natural sciences, touching on topics related to the human mind and consciousness.

  1. Legacy of Ancient Predecessors: Both the medical and philosophical traditions in medieval psychology drew inspiration from the legacies of ancient thinkers. Avicenna’s contributions echoed the integration of medicine and philosophy seen in the works of Hippocrates and Galen. Similarly, the philosophical inquiries of Albertus Magnus reflected the enduring influence of ancient philosophical ideas on human nature and cognition.
  2. Intersection of Disciplines: It is important to acknowledge that medieval thought was not confined to neatly defined disciplinary boundaries. Medical and philosophical inquiries often intersected, blurring the lines between fields and highlighting the interconnectedness of knowledge.

In summary, the medieval period may not have given rise to a formal discipline of psychology, yet it was a time of intellectual curiosity and exploration that foreshadowed psychological inquiries. Scholars like Avicenna and Albertus Magnus exemplified this spirit, delving into matters that resonate with modern psychological concerns. The medical and philosophical traditions that emerged during this era were deeply rooted in the wisdom of ancient predecessors, contributing to the evolution of psychological thought. While the formalization of psychology was still in the future, the seeds of psychological inquiry were sown in the fertile soil of medieval intellectual exploration.

Read more about Medieval Psychology.

Medieval Cognitive Psychology

Medieval cognitive psychology draws its roots from two significant sources that had a profound impact on shaping psychological thought during that era. These sources are the writings of the ancient philosopher Aristotle, particularly his seminal work “De Anima,” and the theory of inner senses that emerged in late antiquity. The influence of Aristotle’s ideas, especially his exploration of the soul, resonated strongly through the Middle Ages, impacting the understanding of cognitive processes and laying the foundation for subsequent discussions on the subject.

  1. The Legacy of Aristotle: Aristotle’s “De Anima,” a treatise on the nature of the soul, played a central role in shaping medieval cognitive psychology. This work was not only influential during its time but continued to be a prominent text for centuries, being assigned reading for Bachelor of Arts degrees across Europe throughout the Middle Ages. While the text’s brevity and occasional complexity presented challenges, its systematic examination of psychology intertwined with other disciplines allowed medieval scholars to engage with Aristotle’s ideas and interpretations.
  2. The Theory of Inner Senses: In addition to Aristotle’s contributions, the theory of inner senses emerged as a significant concept in late antiquity. This theory posited that the human mind possessed distinct internal faculties, each responsible for processing specific sensory information and contributing to cognitive functions. The elaboration of this theory allowed medieval thinkers to delve deeper into the complexities of human cognition and perception.
  3. Interpretive Efforts: Given the sometimes cryptic nature of Aristotle’s “De Anima,” medieval scholars sought to decipher and articulate its intended meaning. Averroes and Aquinas, among others, engaged in extensive commentary and interpretation of Aristotle’s work, striving to elucidate his ideas and make them more accessible to subsequent generations. These interpretive efforts contributed to the transmission and evolution of Aristotle’s cognitive theories.
  4. Integration of Disciplines: Medieval cognitive psychology was not isolated from broader intellectual trends of the time. Instead, it intersected with other fields, reflecting the interconnected nature of knowledge. The blending of philosophical, theological, and scientific inquiries further enriched the discourse surrounding cognition.
  5. Enduring Influence: The ideas and insights derived from Aristotle’s “De Anima” and the theory of inner senses left a lasting imprint on medieval cognitive psychology. They paved the way for discussions on perception, memory, imagination, and other cognitive processes, offering a framework for understanding the complexities of the human mind.

In conclusion, medieval cognitive psychology drew its foundation from the seminal works of Aristotle and the evolving theory of inner senses. These sources contributed to the intellectual landscape of the Middle Ages, shaping discussions on cognition, perception, and the workings of the human mind. The interpretive efforts of scholars like Averroes and Aquinas further enriched the discourse, bridging the gap between ancient wisdom and medieval inquiries. The enduring influence of these ideas attests to their significance in the evolution of cognitive psychology, demonstrating the enduring interplay between ancient and medieval intellectual currents.

Read more about Medieval Cognitive Psychology.

Mental Illness in the Middle Ages

The medieval understanding of mental illness was characterized by a diverse array of beliefs and interpretations, yet a common thread emerged through the lens of cognitive theory. During this era, mental illness was often viewed through the paradigm of disrupted cognitive functioning, which gave rise to distinctive explanations and societal attitudes towards individuals experiencing psychological distress. While the medieval perspective on mental illness was multifaceted, a prevailing notion connected these varied ideas under the umbrella of cognitive disturbances and their consequences for behavior.

  1. Cognitive Control and Normal Functioning: Central to the medieval understanding of mental health was the concept that a healthy individual’s actions and behaviors were guided by the rational mind. A well-functioning mind provided cognitive control over an individual’s actions, enabling them to navigate the world around them based on conscious decision-making and rational thought. This perspective emphasized the mind’s role in regulating behavior and maintaining societal norms.
  2. Disrupted Cognitive Control and Mental Illness: In cases of mental illness or insanity, this cognitive control was believed to be disrupted or corrupted. Individuals experiencing mental distress were thought to have lost their ability to exercise rational control over their thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. Instead, their actions were thought to be dictated by the inner senses and primal appetites, akin to the instinctual behaviors of animals. This perspective linked mental illness to a breakdown of cognitive regulation and reinforced the idea that those suffering from such conditions were not fully accountable for their actions.
  3. Legal and Moral Implications: The medieval understanding of mental illness had far-reaching legal and moral implications. In the later medieval period, legal theorists and theologians began to explore the concept of accountability for actions committed during states of mental illness. Drawing on the cognitive theory of disrupted control, they argued that individuals who were mentally ill should not be held responsible for their behavior, as their actions were deemed involuntary due to cognitive impairment.
  4. Societal Treatment and Compassion: The cognitive perspective on mental illness fostered a level of compassion and understanding in medieval society. Recognizing that individuals experiencing mental distress were not in control of their actions, societal attitudes shifted towards offering care and support rather than punitive measures. The treatment of mentally ill individuals was influenced by the understanding that their behavior was a result of cognitive disruption, leading to efforts aimed at providing care and addressing their well-being.
  5. Legacy and Modern Reflections: The medieval cognitive perspective on mental illness left a lasting impact on societal perceptions and approaches to psychological well-being. While modern understanding of mental health has evolved significantly, echoes of the medieval cognitive theory can still be found in contemporary discussions around accountability, treatment, and empathy for individuals facing mental challenges.

In conclusion, the medieval view of mental illness was characterized by the overarching concept of cognitive disruption. The belief that mental illness disrupted cognitive control over behavior played a pivotal role in shaping the understanding of psychological distress during that era. This perspective influenced legal, moral, and societal responses to individuals experiencing mental illness, highlighting the importance of empathy and care for those facing cognitive disturbances. While the cognitive theory of mental illness has evolved over time, its legacy continues to resonate in contemporary discussions about mental health and the complex interplay between cognition and behavior.

Read more about Mental Illness in the Middle Ages.

References:

  1. Aquinas,T. (1964). Summa theologiae. London: Blackfriars.
  2. Averroes. (1961). Epitome of parva naturalia (H. Blumberg. Trans.). Cambridge. MA: Medieval Academy of Amer­ica.
  3. Avicenna. (1952). Avicennas psychology: An English translation of Kitab A-Najat. Bk. II. Ch. VI with historico-philosophical notes and textual improvements on the Cairo edition (F. Rahman. Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
  4. Lennox, W. G. (1941). John of Gaddesden on epilepsy. Annals of Medical History (3rd series). 1. 283-307.
  5. Carruthers, M. J. (1990). The book of memory: A study of memory in medieval culture. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Clarke. B. (1975). Mental disorder in earlier Britain. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
  7. Harvey, E. R. (1975). The inward wits: Psychological theory in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. London: Warburg Institute.
  8. Jackson, S. W. (1986). Melancholia and depression: From Hip­pocratic times to modern times. New Haven. CT: Yale Uni­versity Press.
  9. Kemp, S. (1990). Medieval psychology. Westport. CT: Green­wood.
  10. Kemp, S. (1996). Cognitive psychology in the Middle Ages. Westport. CT: Greenwood.
  11. Kroll, J. (1973). A reappraisal of psychiatry in the Middle Ages. Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 276-283.
  12. Lindberg. D. C. (1976). Theories of vision from AI-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  13. Wack. M. F. (1990). Lovesickness in the Middle Ages: The ‘Vi­aticum’ and its commentaries. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.