Career Progression Psychology

Career progression psychology is a specialized domain within career psychology that examines the psychological processes, motivational factors, and developmental mechanisms underlying professional advancement and upward mobility in modern work environments. As a core component of career psychology, career progression psychology integrates theories from developmental psychology, motivation science, and organizational behavior to understand how individuals navigate hierarchical advancement, acquire leadership capabilities, and sustain career momentum over time. This field encompasses multiple theoretical perspectives, including self-determination theory, social cognitive career theory, and career construction theory, to provide comprehensive frameworks for understanding the psychological drivers of career advancement. Contemporary career progression psychology addresses the complex interplay between individual motivation, organizational structures, and environmental factors that facilitate or impede professional growth. Research demonstrates that career progression psychology provides essential insights for understanding advancement patterns, identifying psychological barriers to promotion, and developing interventions that enhance career mobility and professional satisfaction across diverse populations and organizational contexts.

Introduction

Career progression psychology represents a sophisticated and increasingly important area of study within career psychology that focuses specifically on the psychological dimensions of professional advancement and upward career mobility. This field has evolved from traditional approaches to career development to encompass the complex psychological processes that drive individuals to seek higher-level positions, acquire leadership responsibilities, and navigate the challenges of career advancement in contemporary organizations.

The modern understanding of career progression psychology recognizes that advancement is not simply a matter of time or technical competence, but involves complex psychological mechanisms including motivation, self-efficacy, identity development, and adaptive capacity (Lent & Brown, 2019). Overall employment of psychologists is projected to grow 6 percent from 2024 to 2034, faster than the average for all occupations (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024), reflecting the increasing recognition of psychological factors in professional success and organizational effectiveness.

Career progression psychology operates at the intersection of individual psychology, organizational behavior, and career development theory. It draws upon established theories of human motivation, personality development, and social cognition while addressing the unique psychological challenges associated with career advancement, leadership development, and professional growth. The field has expanded beyond descriptive approaches to encompass predictive models and intervention strategies that can enhance career progression outcomes.

The significance of career progression psychology extends beyond individual career success to encompass organizational talent management, succession planning, and workforce development. Understanding the psychological factors that drive career progression enables organizations to better identify high-potential employees, design effective development programs, and create environments that foster professional growth and advancement.

Theoretical Foundations

Self-Determination Theory and Career Progression

Self-determination theory provides a fundamental framework for understanding the motivational processes underlying career progression by emphasizing the role of intrinsic motivation, autonomy, competence, and relatedness in driving professional advancement (Deci & Ryan, 2000). According to this psychological framework, people are naturally driven to grow and motivated by internal desires, not just external pressures (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Career progression driven by intrinsic motivation tends to be more sustainable and satisfying than advancement pursued primarily for external rewards (Gagné & Deci, 2005).

The three basic psychological needs identified by self-determination theory—autonomy, competence, and relatedness—play crucial roles in career progression. Autonomy in career progression involves having choices and control over one’s professional development, including the ability to set goals, select development opportunities, and influence career direction. Competence refers to the need to feel effective and capable of achieving desired outcomes, which in career progression contexts involves developing expertise, mastering new skills, and successfully completing challenging assignments.

Relatedness encompasses the social and interpersonal dimensions of career progression, including the ability to build meaningful professional relationships, receive mentorship and support, and contribute to organizational goals that align with personal values. Research demonstrates that individuals who experience high levels of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in their work environments are more likely to engage in proactive career behaviors and achieve sustained career advancement (Van den Broeck et al., 2016).

Social Cognitive Career Theory Integration

Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) provides a comprehensive framework for understanding career progression through its emphasis on self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and personal goals (Lent et al., 1994). SCCT focuses on not only environmental but also individual factors that influence one’s career decision making (Wang et al., 2022), making it particularly relevant for understanding the psychological processes underlying career advancement decisions.

Self-efficacy beliefs play a central role in career progression psychology by influencing individuals’ confidence in their ability to perform at higher levels, take on increased responsibilities, and navigate the challenges associated with career advancement. Individuals with strong self-efficacy beliefs about their capacity for leadership, complex problem-solving, and professional growth are more likely to pursue advancement opportunities and persist through challenges.

Outcome expectations in career progression contexts involve beliefs about the likely consequences of seeking advancement, including anticipated benefits such as increased compensation, status, and professional fulfillment, as well as potential costs such as increased stress, work-life balance challenges, and greater responsibility. These expectations significantly influence motivation to pursue career progression and the specific advancement strategies individuals employ.

Personal goals in career progression represent the specific advancement objectives that individuals set for themselves, such as reaching particular organizational levels, acquiring specific competencies, or achieving certain professional recognition. These goals provide direction for career progression efforts and serve as benchmarks for evaluating progress and success.

Career Construction Theory and Progressive Identity Development

Career construction theory offers valuable insights into career progression psychology by emphasizing the narrative and identity construction processes that underlie professional advancement (Savickas, 2013). Career construction theory has been widely used in career counseling and has substantial application value for understanding how individuals create meaning and continuity in their career progression experiences (Wang & Li, 2024).

The career construction approach recognizes that career progression is not simply a series of job changes or promotions, but involves the ongoing construction of professional identity and the integration of new roles and responsibilities into one’s evolving sense of self. This identity construction process is particularly important in career progression because advancement often involves significant changes in role expectations, social relationships, and professional responsibilities.

Career adaptability, a central concept in career construction theory, is especially relevant to career progression psychology because advancement often requires individuals to adapt to new environments, learn new skills, and take on unfamiliar challenges. The four dimensions of career adaptability—concern, control, curiosity, and confidence—provide a framework for understanding the psychological resources that support successful career progression.

Psychological Processes in Career Progression

Motivation and Career Advancement

The psychology of career progression is fundamentally concerned with understanding the motivational processes that drive individuals to seek advancement and sustain effort toward professional growth over extended periods (London, 1983). Career identity channels a person’s energy, behavior, and performance toward a specific set of career objectives (Meijers, 1998). This motivational dimension encompasses both intrinsic factors such as personal growth needs and achievement orientation, as well as extrinsic factors such as financial rewards and social recognition.

Achievement motivation plays a particularly important role in career progression psychology, as individuals with high achievement motivation tend to seek challenging goals, persist through difficulties, and strive for excellence in their professional performance (McClelland, 1985). This motivation manifests in career progression through behaviors such as seeking stretch assignments, pursuing additional education or training, and actively networking to create advancement opportunities.

Career centrality, representing the degree to which work and career are central to an individual’s identity and life satisfaction, significantly influences career progression motivation (Paullay et al., 1994). Individuals for whom career success is a central life goal are more likely to invest the sustained effort required for advancement and make the personal sacrifices often associated with career progression.

The motivational attributes used to predict career-enhancing strategies include advancement motivation and work/career centrality (Nabi, 2003). These strategies consist of behaviors that are not part of the formal job description but contribute to career advancement, such as expertise development, self-nomination for challenging assignments, and strategic networking.

Self-Efficacy and Progressive Competence Development

Self-efficacy beliefs represent a crucial psychological mechanism in career progression, influencing individuals’ willingness to pursue advancement opportunities, their persistence in the face of challenges, and their ability to develop the competencies required for higher-level positions (Bandura, 1997). Career progression self-efficacy encompasses beliefs about one’s ability to acquire new skills, adapt to increased responsibilities, and perform effectively in leadership roles.

The development of progression-related self-efficacy occurs through multiple sources of information, including mastery experiences gained through successful performance in challenging roles, vicarious learning from observing others’ advancement experiences, social persuasion from mentors and colleagues, and physiological and emotional states associated with career challenges (Bandura, 1997).

Mastery experiences are particularly powerful in building career progression self-efficacy because they provide direct evidence of one’s capability to handle increased responsibilities and perform at higher levels. These experiences often involve successfully completing stretch assignments, leading cross-functional teams, or managing complex projects that demonstrate readiness for advancement.

Vicarious learning contributes to career progression self-efficacy through observation of role models and mentors who have successfully navigated similar advancement challenges. This observational learning helps individuals develop realistic expectations about career progression processes and acquire strategies for overcoming common obstacles.

Identity Development and Role Transitions

Career progression involves significant identity development challenges as individuals transition from individual contributor roles to management positions, from technical specialists to generalists, or from followers to leaders (Ibarra, 1999). These role transitions require psychological adaptation and the integration of new professional identities with existing self-concepts.

Professional identity development in career progression contexts involves several key processes, including role expansion, where individuals learn to balance multiple responsibilities and stakeholder relationships; perspective taking, where they develop the ability to understand and respond to diverse viewpoints; and leadership identity formation, where they cultivate confidence and competence in influencing and directing others.

The psychological challenges associated with career progression role transitions include managing increased complexity and ambiguity, developing comfort with higher levels of visibility and accountability, and maintaining authentic leadership styles while adapting to new role expectations (Hill, 2003). These challenges require psychological flexibility, emotional regulation skills, and the ability to learn and adapt quickly.

Identity integration represents another crucial aspect of career progression psychology, as individuals must reconcile their advancing professional identities with other important life roles and values. This integration process can create tension between career advancement goals and other priorities such as family responsibilities, personal relationships, and non-work interests.

Assessment and Measurement

Career Progression Readiness Assessment

Effective assessment of career progression psychology requires comprehensive frameworks for evaluating individuals’ readiness for advancement, including their motivational orientation, competency development, and psychological adaptability. These assessments must capture both the psychological factors that drive advancement motivation and the individual characteristics that predict successful adaptation to higher-level roles.

Motivational readiness assessment involves evaluating individuals’ achievement orientation, career centrality, advancement motivation, and intrinsic versus extrinsic goal orientation. These assessments help identify individuals who possess the sustained motivation required for career progression and can inform development planning to enhance motivational readiness where needed.

Competency readiness assessment examines individuals’ current skill levels relative to advancement requirements, their learning agility and adaptability, and their capacity to develop new competencies. This assessment dimension is crucial because career progression often requires individuals to move beyond their areas of technical expertise and develop broader leadership and management capabilities.

Psychological adaptability assessment evaluates individuals’ resilience, emotional regulation, tolerance for ambiguity, and ability to manage increased stress and complexity. These psychological characteristics are essential for successful navigation of the challenges associated with career advancement and role transitions.

Leadership Potential and Advancement Capacity

Career progression psychology requires sophisticated approaches to assessing leadership potential and advancement capacity that go beyond traditional performance evaluations to examine the psychological factors that predict success in higher-level roles. These assessments must account for the complex interplay between cognitive abilities, personality characteristics, and situational factors that influence leadership effectiveness.

Cognitive capacity assessment examines individuals’ ability to handle complex problem-solving, strategic thinking, and decision-making under uncertainty. These cognitive capabilities become increasingly important as individuals advance to higher organizational levels where they must navigate complex challenges and make decisions with significant organizational impact.

Personality assessment in career progression contexts focuses on characteristics that predict leadership success, such as emotional stability, extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Research consistently demonstrates that certain personality characteristics are associated with advancement success and leadership effectiveness across diverse organizational contexts (Judge et al., 2002).

Situational judgment assessment evaluates individuals’ ability to navigate complex interpersonal situations, make ethical decisions under pressure, and demonstrate sound judgment in ambiguous circumstances. These capabilities are essential for career progression because higher-level roles typically involve greater complexity and higher stakes decision-making.

Table 1: Psychological Assessment Dimensions for Career Progression

Assessment Domain	Key Components	Measurement Approaches	Predictive Validity
Motivational Readiness	Achievement orientation, career centrality	Self-report scales, behavioral indicators	High for sustained effort
Competency Development	Learning agility, skill acquisition	360-degree feedback, performance data	Moderate to high
Leadership Potential	Influence skills, strategic thinking	Assessment centers, simulations	High for management roles
Psychological Adaptability	Resilience, stress tolerance	Personality inventories, situational tests	Moderate for role transitions

Performance and Advancement Tracking

Longitudinal tracking of career progression requires comprehensive systems for monitoring both objective advancement indicators and subjective psychological outcomes over extended periods. These tracking systems enable researchers and practitioners to understand the relationships between psychological factors and career progression outcomes, identify patterns of successful advancement, and evaluate the effectiveness of career development interventions.

Objective progression indicators include promotion rates, salary advancement, scope of responsibility increases, and leadership role acquisitions. These metrics provide concrete evidence of career advancement but must be interpreted within organizational and industry contexts to account for varying advancement opportunities and timelines.

Subjective progression indicators encompass career satisfaction, sense of advancement progress, goal achievement, and alignment between career progression and personal values. These subjective measures are crucial because they reflect individuals’ psychological experiences of career progression and their motivation to continue pursuing advancement.

Psychological development tracking involves monitoring changes in self-efficacy beliefs, identity development, leadership competencies, and adaptability over time. This longitudinal perspective enables understanding of how psychological factors evolve during career progression and identification of critical development periods.

Applications and Interventions

Individual Career Progression Coaching

Career progression psychology provides valuable foundations for individual coaching interventions designed to enhance advancement readiness, overcome psychological barriers to progression, and develop the competencies required for successful career advancement. These coaching approaches integrate psychological assessment, skill development, and strategic planning to create comprehensive advancement support systems.

Motivational coaching addresses the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that drive career progression by helping individuals clarify their advancement goals, align career progression with personal values, and develop sustainable motivation for the sustained effort required for advancement. This coaching approach recognizes that career progression requires long-term commitment and must be aligned with individuals’ deeper purposes and values.

Competency development coaching focuses on helping individuals identify and develop the skills required for advancement, including technical competencies specific to their field, leadership and management capabilities, and interpersonal skills required for higher-level roles. This development process often involves stretch assignments, skill-building programs, and experiential learning opportunities.

Psychological preparation coaching addresses the identity development and adaptation challenges associated with career progression by helping individuals develop confidence in their leadership capabilities, prepare for increased visibility and accountability, and manage the stress and complexity associated with higher-level roles.

Organizational Talent Development Programs

Organizations can apply career progression psychology principles to design more effective talent development programs that identify high-potential employees, accelerate their development, and improve advancement success rates. These programs integrate psychological assessment, targeted development experiences, and ongoing support to create systematic approaches to career advancement.

High-potential identification programs utilize psychological assessments to identify employees with the motivational orientation, cognitive capacity, and personality characteristics associated with advancement success. These identification processes must be carefully designed to ensure fairness and avoid bias while accurately predicting advancement potential.

Accelerated development programs provide targeted experiences designed to develop the competencies and psychological readiness required for advancement. These programs often include challenging assignments, mentoring relationships, executive coaching, and leadership development activities specifically designed to prepare individuals for higher-level roles.

Succession planning programs integrate career progression psychology principles to ensure systematic development of internal talent for key organizational positions. These programs require long-term planning, ongoing assessment, and coordinated development experiences to prepare individuals for specific advancement opportunities.

Diversity and Inclusion in Career Progression

Career progression psychology must address the systematic barriers and biases that may limit advancement opportunities for underrepresented groups, including women, racial and ethnic minorities, and other historically disadvantaged populations. These applications require understanding of how stereotypes, unconscious bias, and structural inequities influence career progression experiences.

Bias interruption programs utilize psychological insights about unconscious bias to design interventions that reduce discrimination in advancement decisions. These programs often include bias awareness training, structured decision-making processes, and accountability systems designed to ensure fair treatment in career progression opportunities.

Mentoring and sponsorship programs specifically designed for underrepresented groups provide targeted support for career advancement by connecting high-potential individuals with senior leaders who can provide guidance, advocacy, and access to advancement opportunities. These programs recognize that career progression often requires social capital and network access that may be less available to some groups.

Inclusive leadership development programs prepare all leaders to support the career progression of diverse team members by developing cultural competence, inclusive leadership skills, and awareness of the unique challenges faced by underrepresented groups in career advancement.

Contemporary Issues and Challenges

Remote Work and Virtual Career Progression

The increasing prevalence of remote and hybrid work arrangements has created new challenges for career progression psychology, as traditional advancement mechanisms such as visibility to senior leadership, informal mentoring relationships, and organic networking opportunities may be limited in virtual work environments (Kniffin et al., 2021).

Virtual relationship building requires new approaches to developing the social connections that often facilitate career advancement. This includes mastering virtual networking techniques, building influence through digital communication channels, and maintaining visibility and engagement in remote work settings.

Remote leadership development presents unique challenges because many leadership skills are traditionally developed through face-to-face interactions, observational learning, and informal feedback processes that may be limited in virtual environments. Career progression psychology must adapt to help individuals develop leadership competencies through virtual experiences and digital learning platforms.

Digital career advancement strategies require understanding of how to navigate career progression in technology-mediated environments, including building online professional presence, participating effectively in virtual teams and projects, and communicating career aspirations through digital channels.

Gig Economy and Non-Traditional Career Progression

The growth of gig work, freelancing, and non-traditional employment arrangements challenges traditional models of career progression that assume advancement occurs within organizational hierarchies. Career progression psychology must adapt to understand advancement in contexts where traditional promotion structures do not exist.

Portfolio career progression involves building advancement across multiple projects, clients, or employers rather than within single organizations. This requires different psychological skills, including self-marketing, continuous learning, and tolerance for uncertainty and variability in work arrangements.

Entrepreneurial career progression encompasses the psychological processes involved in building businesses and taking on leadership roles as business owners. This progression path requires different psychological capabilities, including risk tolerance, innovation orientation, and the ability to create structure and direction in ambiguous environments.

Network-based advancement relies on professional relationships and reputation building across multiple organizations and contexts. This progression approach requires strong relationship-building skills, personal branding capabilities, and the ability to maintain connections across diverse professional networks.

Technology and Artificial Intelligence Impact

Rapid technological change and the increasing role of artificial intelligence in work environments create new challenges and opportunities for career progression psychology (Parker & Grote, 2022). Technological innovations have significantly impacted career advancement by changing skill requirements, creating new types of roles, and altering the nature of work itself.

Continuous learning and adaptation become increasingly important for career progression as technological change accelerates. This requires psychological flexibility, learning agility, and comfort with ongoing skill development throughout one’s career rather than relying on stable competencies developed early in career.

Human-AI collaboration skills represent a new category of competencies required for career progression in technology-enhanced work environments. This includes understanding how to work effectively with AI systems, managing human-technology interfaces, and developing uniquely human capabilities that complement technological capabilities.

Digital leadership competencies involve the ability to lead and influence in technology-mediated environments, manage virtual teams effectively, and navigate the ethical and social implications of technology in organizational contexts.

Table 2: Contemporary Career Progression Challenges and Adaptations

Challenge Area	Traditional Approach	Contemporary Requirements	Psychological Implications
Work Environment	Face-to-face advancement	Virtual relationship building	Enhanced communication skills
Career Structure	Organizational hierarchy	Portfolio progression	Greater self-direction
Skill Development	Stable competencies	Continuous learning	Learning agility
Leadership Context	Direct supervision	Digital influence	Technology adaptation

Research Evidence and Future Directions

Empirical Studies and Validation

Extensive research in career progression psychology has provided substantial evidence for the psychological factors that predict advancement success and the interventions that enhance career progression outcomes. This research base includes longitudinal studies of career advancement patterns, experimental evaluations of development interventions, and cross-cultural investigations of career progression processes.

Longitudinal studies demonstrate that psychological factors such as achievement motivation, self-efficacy beliefs, and career adaptability predict advancement success beyond the effects of technical competencies and educational background (Seibert et al., 1999). These studies provide evidence for the importance of psychological preparation and development in career advancement.

Intervention research shows that coaching, mentoring, and development programs based on career progression psychology principles produce significant improvements in advancement outcomes (Theeboom et al., 2014). Career growth opportunities enhance employees’ experiences of thriving and lead to improved career commitment and reduced career regret (Chay & Aryee, 1999).

Cross-cultural research reveals both universal and culture-specific aspects of career progression psychology, highlighting the importance of cultural context in understanding advancement motivation and the effectiveness of different development approaches across diverse populations (Leong & Serafica, 2001).

Meta-Analytic Evidence

Meta-analytic studies synthesizing results across multiple research investigations provide robust evidence for the effectiveness of career progression psychology interventions and the importance of psychological factors in career advancement (Burke & McKeen, 1994). These studies demonstrate consistent positive effects across different populations, organizations, and cultural contexts.

Effect sizes for career progression interventions typically fall in the moderate to large range, indicating practical significance for individuals and organizations. The strongest effects are typically found for interventions that address multiple psychological dimensions simultaneously rather than focusing on single factors.

Moderator analyses identify factors that influence the effectiveness of career progression interventions, such as organizational context, individual characteristics, and intervention design features. These analyses inform best practices for designing and implementing career progression support programs.

Future Research Priorities

Future research in career progression psychology should address several critical areas that will enhance understanding of advancement processes and improve intervention effectiveness. These research priorities reflect both methodological opportunities and pressing practical needs in contemporary career development.

Technology integration research should investigate how digital technologies can enhance career progression psychology interventions, including virtual reality training simulations, AI-powered coaching systems, and digital platforms for career development. These technologies offer opportunities to create more accessible and personalized career progression support.

Diversity and inclusion research should examine the psychological factors that contribute to advancement disparities across different demographic groups and evaluate interventions designed to promote more equitable career progression opportunities. This research should address both individual-level barriers and systemic factors that influence advancement patterns.

Cross-cultural research should expand understanding of how cultural values, organizational structures, and societal factors influence career progression psychology across different global contexts. This research can inform the development of culturally responsive career progression interventions and theory.

Longitudinal methodology development should improve approaches to studying career progression over extended time periods, including methods for handling missing data, accounting for changing organizational contexts, and measuring psychological development processes over time.

Conclusion

Career progression psychology has emerged as a vital and sophisticated field within career psychology that provides essential insights into the psychological processes underlying professional advancement and upward career mobility. Through the integration of motivation science, developmental psychology, and organizational behavior theory, this field offers comprehensive frameworks for understanding how individuals navigate the complex challenges of career advancement.

The theoretical foundations of career progression psychology, including self-determination theory, social cognitive career theory, and career construction theory, provide robust explanations for the psychological mechanisms that drive advancement motivation, support competency development, and facilitate successful role transitions. These theories demonstrate that career progression is not simply a matter of technical competence or organizational opportunity, but involves complex psychological processes that can be understood, assessed, and enhanced through targeted interventions.

Research evidence consistently demonstrates the importance of psychological factors in career advancement outcomes and the effectiveness of interventions based on career progression psychology principles. Meta-analytic studies show that individuals who receive coaching and development support based on psychological principles achieve better advancement outcomes than those who rely solely on technical skill development or informal progression processes.

Contemporary challenges in career progression psychology, including the impact of remote work, non-traditional career structures, and technological change, require continued innovation in theory and practice. These challenges also create opportunities for developing new approaches to career advancement that are more flexible, inclusive, and responsive to changing work environments.

The practical applications of career progression psychology extend across individual coaching, organizational talent development, and diversity and inclusion initiatives. These applications demonstrate the field’s relevance for addressing real-world career advancement challenges and creating more effective support systems for professional development.

Future developments in career progression psychology will likely emphasize increased integration with technology, expanded focus on diversity and inclusion, and enhanced understanding of career progression in global and cross-cultural contexts. The field’s continued evolution will require ongoing collaboration between researchers, practitioners, and organizations to ensure that career progression psychology remains relevant and effective in supporting professional advancement.

The success of career progression psychology ultimately depends on its ability to provide actionable insights that improve advancement outcomes for individuals while supporting organizational goals for talent development and succession planning. As work environments continue to evolve and become more complex, the need for sophisticated understanding of the psychological factors underlying career progression will only increase, making this field increasingly important for career psychology and professional development.

Through continued research, innovation, and application, career progression psychology will continue to provide valuable contributions to understanding and supporting professional advancement in the 21st century workplace.

References

1. American Psychological Association. (2023). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major: Version 3.0. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/undergraduate-psychology-major.pdf
2. Appleby, D. C. (2015). An online career-exploration resource for psychology majors. Office of Teaching Resources in Psychology Online. Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://psychology.ecu.edu/wp-content/pv-uploads/sites/216/2019/02/appleby15students.pdf
3. Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era. Oxford University Press.
4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(3), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2016-0191
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
7. Blustein, D. L., & Guarino, P. A. (2020). Work and unemployment in the time of COVID-19: The existential experience of loss and fear. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 60(5), 702-709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167820934229
8. Brown, D. (2007). Career information, career counseling, and career development (9th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
9. Burke, R. J., & McKeen, C. A. (1994). Training and development activities and career success of managerial and professional women. Journal of Management Development, 13(5), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719410063396
10. Camussi, E., Annovazzi, C., Duradoni, M., & Guglielmi, D. (2023). Promoting career resilience through life design: An online intervention for university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1187829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187829
11. Chartrand, J. M. (1991). The evolution of trait-and-factor career counseling: A person × environment fit approach. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69(6), 518-524. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb02638.x
12. Chauvin, J. C., Miller, R., Godfrey, R., & Thomas, V. (2010). The effects of psychological type on career choice among college majors. Journal of Psychological Type, 70(8), 86-97.
13. Chay, Y. W., & Aryee, S. (1999). Potential moderating influence of career growth opportunities on careerist orientation and work attitudes: Evidence of the protean career era in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(5), 613-623. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199909)20:5<613::AID-JOB917>3.0.CO;2-5
14. Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. University of Minnesota Press.
15. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
16. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
17. Gysbers, N. C., Heppner, M. J., & Johnston, J. A. (2014). Career counseling: Contexts, processes, and techniques (4th ed.). American Counseling Association.
18. Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1
19. Hill, L. A. (2003). Becoming a manager: How new managers master the challenges of leadership (2nd ed.). Harvard Business Review Press.
20. Holland, J. L. (1966). The psychology of vocational choice. Blaisdell Publishing Company.
21. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
22. Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 764-791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667055
23. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765-780. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765
24. Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
25. Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., … van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
26. Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Bravo, J. (2011). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational support for development: The critical role of career opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 485-500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021452
27. Krumboltz, J. D. (2009). The wisdom of indecision: Why the happiest people don’t always make the smartest choices. Research Press.
28. Lent, R. W. (2013). Social cognitive career theory. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (2nd ed., pp. 115-146). John Wiley & Sons.
29. Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2019). Social cognitive career theory at 25: Progress in studying the domain satisfaction and career self-management models. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(4), 563-578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719852736
30. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
31. Lent, R. W., Ezeofor, I., Morrison, M. A., Penn, L. T., & Ireland, G. W. (2016). Applying the social cognitive model of career self-management to career exploration and decision-making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 93, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.12.007
32. Leong, F. T. L., & Serafica, F. C. (2001). Cross-cultural perspective on Super’s career development theory: Career maturity and cultural accommodation. In F. T. L. Leong & A. Barak (Eds.), Contemporary models in vocational psychology: A volume in honor of Samuel H. Osipow (pp. 167-205). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. London, M. (1983). Toward a theory of career motivation. Academy of Management Review, 8(4), 620-630. https://doi.org/10.2307/258263
34. McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Scott, Foresman and Company.
35. Meijers, F. (1998). The development of a career identity. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 20(3), 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005399417256
36. Myers, I. B. (1987). Introduction to type: A description of the theory and applications of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press.
37. Nabi, G. R. (2003). Situational characteristics and subjective career success: The mediating role of career-enhancing strategies. International Journal of Manpower, 24(6), 653-671. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720310496139
38. National Career Development Association. (2012). Career development: A policy statement. NCDA.
39. Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (2022). Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Applied Psychology, 71(4), 1171-1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241
40. Parsons, F. (1909). Choosing a vocation. Houghton Mifflin.
41. Paullay, I. M., Alliger, G. M., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 224-228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.224
42. Pordelan, N., Abedi, M. R., Abedi, A., & Motamedi, A. (2021). Digital storytelling: A novel intervention in career counseling. The Career Development Quarterly, 69(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12248
43. Pordelan, N., Sadeghi, A., Abedi, M. R., & Kaedi, M. (2018). How online career counseling changes career development: A life design paradigm. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2493-2507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9735-1
44. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
45. Sampson, J. P., Jr., Lenz, J. G., Reardon, R. C., & Peterson, G. W. (1999). A cognitive information processing approach to employment problem solving and decision making. The Career Development Quarterly, 48(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1999.tb00271.x
46. Savickas, M. L. (2011). Career counseling. American Psychological Association.
47. Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (2nd ed., pp. 147-183). John Wiley & Sons.
48. Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J. P., Duarte, M. E., Guichard, J., Soresi, S., Van Esbroeck, R., & Van Vianen, A. E. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.04.004
49. Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011
50. Schwartz, B. M., & Stamm, K. (2024). Many career options in applied psychology. Psychology Student Network. https://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/psn/2024/09/applied-psychology-careers
51. Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416-427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416
52. Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16(5), 537-549. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0153
53. Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & van Vianen, A. E. (2014). Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.837499
54. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024). Occupational outlook handbook: Psychologists. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/life-physical-and-social-science/psychologists.htm
55. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195-1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058
56. Wang, D., & Li, Y. (2024). Career construction theory: Tools, interventions, and future trends. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1381233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1381233
57. Wang, L., Liu, Y., & Deng, L. (2022). The perspectives of social cognitive career theory approach in current times. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1023994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023994
58. Weng, Q., & McElroy, J. C. (2012). Organizational career growth, affective occupational commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 256-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.014