The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993 established fundamental workplace protections that enable eligible employees to balance work and family responsibilities through unpaid, job-protected leave for specific family and medical reasons. This landmark legislation intersects significantly with corporate ethics by establishing employer responsibilities to support employee welfare while maintaining operational effectiveness. As industrial-organizational psychology continues to examine work-life balance and employee well-being, the FMLA serves as a critical foundation for understanding how legislative frameworks shape organizational behavior and human resource practices. Contemporary developments include expanded interpretations of qualifying conditions, clarifications regarding remote work eligibility, and growing state-level initiatives to provide paid family and medical leave benefits. Recent research demonstrates the FMLA’s positive impact on employee retention, organizational commitment, and workplace equity, while also revealing implementation challenges and areas for improvement. The evolving landscape includes emerging legislative proposals to expand coverage, reduce eligibility requirements, and address the financial hardships associated with unpaid leave, reflecting changing workforce demographics and societal expectations regarding family-supportive workplace policies.
Introduction
The Family and Medical Leave Act represents a watershed moment in American labor policy, establishing for the first time a federal guarantee that workers could take time off for serious family and medical needs without losing their jobs. Enacted in 1993 as President Bill Clinton’s first legislative accomplishment, the FMLA emerged from decades of advocacy for family-supportive workplace policies and recognition that traditional employment relationships inadequately addressed the realities of modern family life.
The legislation responded to dramatic demographic shifts in the American workforce that had accelerated throughout the latter half of the 20th century. Women’s labor force participation had more than doubled since the 1950s, rising from approximately 34% in 1950 to nearly 60% by 1990. Simultaneously, the number of dual-earner families increased substantially, creating new challenges for managing caregiving responsibilities alongside employment obligations. These trends, combined with an aging population that increasingly required care from adult children, highlighted the inadequacy of existing workplace policies that treated employment and family responsibilities as mutually exclusive demands.
From an industrial-organizational psychology perspective, the FMLA represents a critical intervention in the relationship between individual well-being and organizational productivity. Research has consistently demonstrated that employees experiencing significant family or health stressors without adequate workplace support exhibit higher rates of absenteeism, decreased job performance, and increased turnover intentions. The FMLA’s job protection provisions help mitigate these negative outcomes by providing employees with security and predictability during times of crisis, potentially enhancing both individual and organizational resilience.
The intersection of the FMLA with corporate ethics manifests in multiple dimensions, including employers’ moral obligations to support employee welfare, considerations of distributive justice in leave policy implementation, and the tension between short-term operational costs and long-term organizational sustainability. Contemporary discussions of corporate social responsibility increasingly recognize family-supportive policies as essential components of ethical business practices, reflecting broader societal expectations that employers contribute positively to community well-being and social stability.
Legislative Framework and Coverage Requirements
Employer Coverage and Eligibility Criteria
The FMLA applies to private sector employers engaged in commerce who employ 50 or more employees for each working day during at least 20 weeks in the current or preceding calendar year. This coverage threshold reflects legislative compromise between providing meaningful worker protections and avoiding excessive regulatory burden on small businesses, though it excludes approximately 40% of the private sector workforce from FMLA protections.
Public agencies, including federal, state, and local government employers, are covered regardless of the number of employees they employ. Local educational agencies, encompassing public school systems and private elementary and secondary schools, are similarly covered without regard to employee count. This broader coverage for public sector employers reflects recognition of government’s responsibility to model best practices in employment relations and provide leadership in supporting family-friendly workplace policies.
Employee eligibility requires satisfaction of three criteria: employment with a covered employer for at least 12 months, completion of at least 1,250 hours of service during the 12-month period immediately preceding the commencement of leave, and employment at a worksite where the employer has at least 50 employees within a 75-mile radius. The hours requirement equates to approximately 24 hours per week over a full year, effectively excluding many part-time and temporary workers from coverage.
The 75-mile radius requirement addresses concerns about operational disruption in geographically dispersed organizations while potentially creating inequities between employees at different locations of the same employer. Recent Department of Labor clarifications have confirmed that remote employees are eligible for FMLA leave on the same basis as on-site workers, with their eligibility determined by the location where they report or from which their work is directed.
Qualifying Leave Reasons and Duration
The FMLA provides eligible employees with up to 12 workweeks of unpaid leave during any 12-month period for four specified reasons: the birth of a child and bonding with the newborn, placement of a child for adoption or foster care and bonding with the newly placed child, care for an immediate family member with a serious health condition, and the employee’s own serious health condition that renders them unable to perform essential job functions.
Additional qualifying reasons include certain military-related circumstances, including “qualifying exigencies” arising from a family member’s covered military service and up to 26 weeks of leave to care for a covered servicemember with a serious injury or illness. These military provisions, added through amendments in 2008 and 2010, recognize the unique challenges faced by military families and reflect growing societal awareness of service members’ sacrifices.
The definition of “immediate family member” is limited to spouses, children (including biological, adopted, foster, and stepchildren, and those for whom the employee serves in loco parentis), and parents. This narrow definition has been criticized for failing to reflect contemporary family structures, including same-sex partnerships (though the Department of Labor has clarified that legally married same-sex spouses are covered), grandparent caregiving relationships, and chosen family arrangements.
Serious Health Condition Determinations
The concept of “serious health condition” represents one of the FMLA’s most complex and frequently litigated aspects. The statute defines it as an illness, injury, impairment, or physical or mental condition involving inpatient care or continuing treatment by a health care provider. Regulatory definitions provide additional specificity, including conditions requiring absence from work for more than three consecutive days with continuing treatment, chronic serious health conditions requiring periodic treatment, and pregnancy-related incapacity.
Recent Department of Labor guidance has clarified that certain conditions may qualify as serious health conditions even without traditional medical intervention, particularly in cases involving mental health conditions or chronic illnesses that require ongoing management. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought additional complexity to these determinations, with Long COVID potentially qualifying as a serious health condition when it substantially limits major life activities or requires continuing medical treatment.
The certification process allows employers to require medical documentation supporting leave requests, with provisions for second and third medical opinions in cases of conflicting assessments. This process attempts to balance employers’ legitimate needs to verify leave eligibility with employees’ privacy rights and the practical challenges of obtaining detailed medical information during health crises.
Contemporary Developments and Recent Clarifications
Remote Work and FMLA Eligibility
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated remote work adoption, prompting important clarifications regarding FMLA eligibility for remote employees. In February 2023, the Department of Labor issued Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2023-1, confirming that remote workers are eligible for FMLA leave on the same basis as office-based employees, with eligibility determined by their assigned worksite or the location from which their work is directed.
This clarification addressed confusion about how to apply the 75-mile radius requirement to remote workers and established that an employee’s home location is not determinative of their eligibility. For remote workers assigned to a specific office location, that office serves as their worksite for FMLA purposes. For fully remote employees without a designated office assignment, eligibility is determined based on the location where they receive work assignments and report to supervisors.
The guidance also clarified that remote employees’ workdays begin when they commence their first “principal activity” and end when they cease performing work duties, providing consistency with existing wage and hour law interpretations. These clarifications help ensure that the growth of remote work does not create inadvertent gaps in FMLA coverage while providing employers with clear guidelines for administration.
Chronic Conditions and Reduced Schedule Leave
Recent Department of Labor opinion letters have provided important clarifications regarding employees with chronic serious health conditions who require ongoing reduced work schedules. Opinion Letter FMLA 2023-1-A confirmed that employees with chronic conditions can maintain reduced schedules indefinitely, provided they do not exhaust their annual FMLA entitlement, addressing concerns that such arrangements might violate the Act’s intent.
This guidance recognizes the reality that many serious health conditions, including diabetes, heart disease, mental health conditions, and autoimmune disorders, may require long-term workplace accommodations rather than discrete periods of absence. The opinion letter emphasizes that FMLA leave can be taken intermittently or on a reduced schedule when medically necessary, providing flexibility that better serves both employee needs and employer operational requirements.
The clarification also addressed intersection issues with the Americans with Disabilities Act, noting that employees may be entitled to both FMLA protections and ADA reasonable accommodations, with employers required to consider both frameworks when evaluating employee requests for workplace modifications.
Military Family Leave Provisions
The FMLA’s military family leave provisions have undergone periodic refinement to address evolving needs of military families and changes in military operations. Qualifying exigency leave covers activities such as attending military events, arranging childcare, making financial arrangements, and attending counseling sessions related to a family member’s deployment.
Military caregiver leave allows up to 26 weeks of leave during a single 12-month period to care for a covered servicemember with a serious injury or illness incurred in the line of duty. This provision covers not only current servicemembers but also veterans who incurred or aggravated serious injuries or illnesses during military service within five years of separation from service.
Recent guidance has clarified that military caregiver leave operates on a separate entitlement from other FMLA leave reasons, meaning that employees can potentially use both military caregiver leave and traditional FMLA leave within the same period, though not simultaneously for the same condition or family member.
State-Level Paid Family and Medical Leave Initiatives
Overview of State Programs
As of 2025, thirteen states and the District of Columbia have enacted comprehensive paid family and medical leave programs, with additional states implementing voluntary systems or considering legislation. These state initiatives address the FMLA’s most significant limitation: the lack of wage replacement during leave periods, which renders FMLA protections inaccessible to many workers who cannot afford unpaid time off.
California pioneered state-level paid family leave in 2004, building upon its existing temporary disability insurance program. The program provides partial wage replacement for workers taking leave to bond with new children or care for seriously ill family members, funded through employee payroll deductions. California’s program has served as a model for subsequent state initiatives, demonstrating the feasibility of providing paid leave benefits while maintaining employer cost control.
New York, New Jersey, and Rhode Island have developed similar programs, with variations in benefit levels, duration, and funding mechanisms. More recent programs in Washington, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and other states have incorporated lessons learned from earlier implementations, often providing more generous benefits and broader coverage than pioneering programs.
Program Design and Implementation Challenges
State paid family leave programs typically operate as social insurance systems, using pooled employee and employer contributions to fund benefits. Benefit levels generally replace 50-80% of wages up to specified maximums, with many programs providing higher replacement rates for lower-wage workers to address equity concerns.
Implementation challenges have included ensuring adequate program funding, managing administrative complexity, and coordinating with existing federal and state leave laws. Several states have experienced delays in program launch due to technical difficulties with benefit administration systems or concerns about fiscal sustainability.
Employer compliance requirements vary across states but typically include payroll tax collection, employee notification, and coordination with federal FMLA requirements. Multi-state employers face particular challenges in managing varying requirements across jurisdictions, leading to calls for federal legislation that would provide consistent national standards.
Impact on Federal FMLA Policy
State-level initiatives have created a complex patchwork of leave policies that varies dramatically based on employee location. This variation has generated renewed interest in federal paid family leave legislation, with several bills introduced in Congress that would establish national paid leave programs or provide federal support for state initiatives.
The existence of state programs has also influenced FMLA interpretation and administration, as federal regulators work to ensure coordination between federal job protection requirements and state benefit programs. Clear guidance on the interaction between FMLA and state paid leave programs is essential to prevent employee confusion and ensure that workers receive full protection under applicable laws.
Research on state programs has provided valuable evidence regarding the effects of paid family leave on employee welfare, organizational productivity, and economic outcomes. Studies consistently show that paid leave programs increase leave uptake, particularly among lower-income workers and men, while having minimal negative effects on employer operations or labor costs.
Industrial-Organizational Psychology Research and Implications
Work-Life Balance and Employee Well-being
Extensive research in industrial-organizational psychology has examined the FMLA’s impact on work-life balance, employee well-being, and organizational outcomes. Studies consistently demonstrate that access to family and medical leave reduces work-family conflict, enhances job satisfaction, and improves employee mental health outcomes. The job protection provisions of the FMLA appear particularly important in reducing employee stress and anxiety during family or health crises.
Research has also revealed gender differences in FMLA utilization patterns, with women more likely to use leave for caregiving purposes and men more likely to use leave for their own health conditions. These patterns reflect broader societal expectations regarding caregiving responsibilities and highlight the FMLA’s role in potentially reinforcing or challenging traditional gender roles in family caregiving.
Studies of paid family leave programs at the state level provide important insights into how wage replacement affects leave utilization and outcomes. Paid leave programs significantly increase leave uptake rates, particularly among lower-income workers who cannot afford unpaid leave. They also increase men’s utilization of parental leave, suggesting that financial barriers may be particularly important in shaping men’s caregiving behaviors.
Organizational Implementation and Management Challenges
Industrial-organizational research has identified several key challenges in FMLA implementation that affect both employee experiences and organizational effectiveness. These include inconsistent application of eligibility criteria, inadequate supervisor training on FMLA requirements, and difficulties in managing workforce disruption during employee absences.
Supervisory attitudes and knowledge significantly influence FMLA implementation quality. Research demonstrates that supervisors who understand FMLA requirements and support work-life balance are more likely to facilitate smooth leave transitions and maintain positive relationships with employees during and after leave periods. Conversely, supervisors who view FMLA leave negatively or lack understanding of legal requirements may create hostile work environments that violate employee rights and harm organizational climate.
Organizational culture appears to moderate FMLA effects on employee outcomes. Companies with family-supportive cultures that genuinely value work-life balance tend to experience more positive FMLA outcomes, including higher employee satisfaction and lower turnover following leave periods. Organizations that view FMLA compliance merely as a legal obligation may experience more negative effects, including employee resentment and decreased organizational commitment.
Strategic Human Resource Management Perspectives
From a strategic human resource management perspective, the FMLA represents both a compliance requirement and an opportunity for competitive advantage through family-supportive policies. Organizations that go beyond minimum FMLA requirements by providing paid leave, expanded family definitions, or additional flexibility often experience benefits including enhanced recruitment, improved retention, and stronger employer brand positioning.
Research suggests that family-supportive policies may be particularly important for attracting and retaining high-performing employees, especially women and younger workers who increasingly prioritize work-life balance in employment decisions. Organizations that fail to provide adequate family support may find themselves at a competitive disadvantage in labor markets where workers have choices among employers.
The business case for comprehensive family and medical leave policies extends beyond compliance to include reduced turnover costs, decreased absenteeism, improved productivity, and enhanced organizational reputation. Studies indicate that the costs of providing leave benefits are often offset by savings from reduced turnover and improved employee engagement.
Legal Compliance and Risk Management
Common Compliance Challenges and Violations
FMLA compliance presents numerous challenges for employers, with common violations including failure to provide required notices, improper denial of leave requests, retaliation against employees who use FMLA leave, and inadequate documentation of leave administration decisions. Department of Labor enforcement data shows that retaliation claims represent a significant portion of FMLA violations, highlighting the importance of supervisor training and organizational culture in supporting leave-taking employees.
Interference with FMLA rights occurs when employers discourage employees from taking leave, deny eligible leave requests, or fail to restore employees to equivalent positions upon return from leave. Retaliation violations involve adverse employment actions taken against employees because they used or attempted to use FMLA leave. Both types of violations can result in significant financial penalties and legal exposure for employers.
Notice requirements present particular challenges, as employers must provide general notice about FMLA rights and specific notices regarding individual leave requests. Failure to provide timely and accurate notices can waive employers’ rights to require medical certifications or count leave against employees’ FMLA entitlements, creating additional legal risks.
Best Practices for FMLA Administration
Effective FMLA administration requires comprehensive policies, consistent procedures, thorough supervisor training, and careful documentation. Organizations should develop clear written policies that explain FMLA rights and responsibilities in accessible language, provide examples of qualifying situations, and outline procedures for requesting and managing leave.
Supervisor training is critical for ensuring consistent and lawful FMLA administration. Training should cover eligibility requirements, qualifying leave reasons, notice and certification requirements, and proper responses to leave requests. Supervisors should understand their role in providing required notices, coordinating with human resources, and maintaining confidentiality regarding employee health information.
Documentation requirements are extensive under the FMLA, with employers required to maintain records regarding leave requests, medical certifications, and leave usage for at least three years. Proper documentation protects employers in enforcement proceedings and helps ensure consistent treatment of similarly situated employees.
Intersection with Other Employment Laws
The FMLA intersects with numerous other employment laws, creating complexity in administration and potential for conflicts. The Americans with Disabilities Act may provide additional leave rights for employees with disabilities, potentially extending beyond FMLA’s 12-week limitation. Workers’ compensation laws may cover some of the same conditions as FMLA, requiring coordination of benefits and leave entitlements.
Title VII and other anti-discrimination laws prohibit employers from discriminating against employees based on protected characteristics, including pregnancy and gender. FMLA’s pregnancy-related provisions supplement these protections by providing specific leave entitlements, but employers must ensure compliance with both frameworks.
State and local leave laws add additional complexity, as many jurisdictions have enacted laws that provide greater protections than federal requirements. Employers must comply with the most protective applicable law, requiring careful analysis of overlapping requirements and potential conflicts.
Future Directions and Emerging Issues
Proposed Federal Legislation
Several bills have been introduced in Congress that would significantly expand federal family and medical leave protections. The Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act would reduce employer size requirements from 50 to 25 employees and employee tenure requirements from 12 months to 90 days, substantially expanding coverage. The FAMILY Act would create a national paid family and medical leave insurance program similar to state programs.
The proposed Job Protection Act (S.210) would make even more dramatic changes, extending FMLA coverage to all employers with one or more employees and reducing eligibility requirements to 90 days of employment. While unlikely to pass in the near term, these proposals reflect growing political support for expanding family leave protections and addressing gaps in current coverage.
Discussions of federal paid family leave have gained momentum as state programs demonstrate feasibility and public support remains strong. However, political divisions regarding funding mechanisms, benefit levels, and employer requirements continue to complicate federal legislative efforts.
Demographic and Workforce Trends
Changing demographics and workforce characteristics continue to create pressure for FMLA expansion and modification. An aging population increases demand for eldercare leave, while changing family structures raise questions about the adequacy of current family member definitions. The growth of non-traditional employment relationships, including gig work and independent contracting, highlights gaps in coverage that may require legislative attention.
Generational differences in work-life balance priorities suggest that family-supportive policies may become increasingly important for workforce attraction and retention. Younger workers consistently express stronger preferences for flexible work arrangements and family-supportive benefits, potentially creating competitive pressure for enhanced leave policies.
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of health-related leave policies and may accelerate interest in expanded coverage for mental health conditions, infectious diseases, and public health emergencies. Long COVID and other post-viral syndromes may require new approaches to chronic condition management and leave administration.
Technology and Administration Innovation
Technological advances offer opportunities to streamline FMLA administration while improving employee experience and compliance outcomes. Digital platforms can facilitate leave requests, automate notice requirements, track leave usage, and maintain required documentation. Artificial intelligence applications may help identify potential FMLA situations and ensure consistent policy application.
However, technology adoption must be balanced with privacy protection and accessibility requirements. Employees must have multiple channels for requesting leave and receiving information, particularly those who may lack access to digital systems or have disabilities that require accommodations.
Integration with other HR systems, including payroll, benefits, and performance management platforms, can reduce administrative burden and improve data accuracy. However, such integration requires careful attention to confidentiality requirements and appropriate access controls for sensitive medical information.
Conclusion
The Family and Medical Leave Act represents a foundational achievement in American workplace policy, establishing crucial protections that enable employees to balance work and family responsibilities without sacrificing job security. Over three decades since its enactment, the FMLA has provided critical support to millions of workers facing family and health crises while demonstrating the feasibility of family-supportive employment policies that benefit both employees and employers.
Contemporary research in industrial-organizational psychology consistently confirms the FMLA’s positive impact on employee well-being, work-life balance, and organizational outcomes when properly implemented. Studies demonstrate that access to job-protected leave reduces stress and anxiety, improves health outcomes, and enhances organizational commitment. The growing body of evidence from state paid family leave programs further illustrates how wage replacement can dramatically increase leave accessibility and improve family welfare without imposing excessive costs on employers.
The intersection of FMLA policy with corporate ethics continues to evolve as societal expectations regarding employer responsibilities expand. Modern conceptions of corporate social responsibility increasingly recognize family-supportive policies as essential components of ethical business practice, reflecting broader understanding of the interconnections between employee welfare, organizational success, and community well-being. Organizations that embrace this broader view of their social obligations often find that comprehensive family leave policies serve as competitive advantages in talent acquisition and retention.
However, significant challenges remain in FMLA implementation and coverage. The Act’s limited reach, excluding millions of workers at small employers, its restriction to unpaid leave, and its narrow definition of qualifying family members all represent areas where expansion could provide meaningful benefits to workers and families. The complex patchwork of state and local leave laws that has emerged to address these gaps creates compliance challenges while highlighting the need for more comprehensive federal action.
Looking toward the future, the FMLA’s legacy lies not only in the protections it currently provides but in its role as a foundation for broader workplace transformation. As demographic trends, workforce characteristics, and societal expectations continue to evolve, the Act’s principles of job protection and family support will likely require expansion and adaptation. The success of state paid leave programs demonstrates both the public demand for more comprehensive protections and the feasibility of providing them through innovative policy designs.
The continued relevance of the FMLA in industrial-organizational psychology reflects the fundamental truth that human beings cannot be separated from their family responsibilities and health needs. Effective organizations must account for the full humanity of their employees, providing support during times of crisis while maintaining operational effectiveness. The FMLA’s enduring significance lies in its recognition that workplace policies must serve not only organizational objectives but also the broader social goal of enabling families to thrive in an economy that requires their labor market participation.
References
- American Psychological Association. (2019). Stress in America: Stress and current events. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2019/stress-america-2019.pdf
- Bartel, A. P., Baum, C. L., Rossin-Slater, M., Ruhm, C. J., & Waldfogel, J. (2021). Paid family leave, fathers’ leave-taking, and leave-sharing in dual-earner households. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(1), 136-169. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22261
- Bipartisan Policy Center. (2024). State paid family leave laws across the U.S. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/state-paid-family-leave-laws-across-the-u-s/
- Center for American Progress. (2024). The state of paid family and medical leave in the U.S. in 2024. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-state-of-paid-family-and-medical-leave-in-the-u-s-in-2024/
- Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General. (2023). Federal employee use of the Family and Medical Leave Act. https://www.oig.hhs.gov/reports/oei-05-23-00180.pdf
- Gennetian, L. A., Darling, M., Aber, J. L., Seefeldt, K. S., & Fauth, R. C. (2022). Parents’ job loss, families’ use of child care, and women’s earnings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Socius, 8, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211073783
- Goodman, J. S., & Blum, T. C. (1996). Assessing the non-random sampling effects of subject attrition in longitudinal research. Journal of Management, 22(4), 627-652. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200405
- Kossek, E. E., & Michel, J. S. (2011). Flexible work schedules. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 1: Building and developing the organization (pp. 535-572). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12169-017
- National Partnership for Women & Families. (2024). State paid family and medical leave insurance laws. https://www.nationalpartnership.org/our-work/resources/economic-justice/paid-leave/state-paid-family-leave-laws.pdf
- Rossin-Slater, M. (2017). Maternity and family leave policy. In S. L. Averett, L. M. Argys, & S. D. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of women and the economy (pp. 323-343). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628963.013.19
- Society for Human Resource Management. (2024). 2024 employee benefits: The evolution of benefits. https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/all-things-work/pages/2024-employee-benefits-evolution-of-benefits.aspx
- U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023). Employee benefits in the United States, March 2023. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ebs2.pdf
- U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division. (2023). Field assistance bulletin no. 2023-1: Application of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act to employees who work from home. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fmla/2023-1
- U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division. (2024). Family and Medical Leave Act regulations. 29 CFR Parts 825. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fmla/final-rule
- Waldfogel, J. (2001). Family and medical leave: Evidence from the 2000 surveys. Monthly Labor Review, 124(9), 17-23. https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2001/09/art2full.pdf
- Winston, H. (2003). Reducing turnover among new hires. Workforce Management, 82(5), 52-56. https://www.workforce.com/news/reducing-turnover-among-new-hires