Building trust with employees represents a fundamental aspect of industrial-organizational psychology that encompasses the systematic development and maintenance of psychological safety, credibility, and mutual respect in workplace relationships. This comprehensive examination explores the theoretical foundations, empirical research, and evidence-based strategies for establishing and sustaining trust between organizational leaders and employees. Drawing from extensive research in corporate psychology and organizational behavior, this article synthesizes key findings regarding trust formation processes, the role of leadership behaviors, measurement approaches, and implementation strategies. Contemporary research demonstrates that organizations with high levels of employee trust experience significantly enhanced performance outcomes, including increased engagement, reduced turnover, improved innovation, and greater organizational resilience. The article examines trust antecedents, mediating mechanisms, and the critical factors that determine successful trust-building initiatives, providing practitioners and researchers with a thorough understanding of this essential organizational dynamic.
Outline
- Introduction
- Theoretical Foundations of Workplace Trust
- Antecedents and Drivers of Employee Trust
- Strategies for Building Trust with Employees
- Measuring and Assessing Employee Trust
- Trust Building in Diverse Organizational Contexts
- Contemporary Challenges and Future Directions
- Conclusion
- References
Introduction
Building trust with employees has emerged as one of the most critical competencies in modern organizational leadership and a cornerstone of effective industrial-organizational psychology practice. Trust serves as the foundation for all meaningful workplace relationships and significantly influences employee engagement, performance, and organizational commitment. In an era characterized by rapid organizational change, economic uncertainty, and evolving employment relationships, the ability to establish and maintain trust with employees has become a strategic imperative for organizational success.
The systematic study of workplace trust gained prominence in the 1990s through the pioneering work of scholars such as Roger Mayer, James Davis, and David Schoorman, who developed foundational models that continue to guide contemporary research and practice. Their integrative model of organizational trust identified ability, benevolence, and integrity as the primary trustworthiness factors that influence employees’ willingness to be vulnerable to their leaders’ actions. This framework has been extensively validated and refined through decades of empirical research across diverse organizational contexts.
Contemporary organizations face unprecedented challenges in building trust with employees due to factors such as increased workforce diversity, generational differences in trust expectations, remote work arrangements, and heightened awareness of corporate social responsibility. Traditional hierarchical approaches to leadership often prove insufficient for building the deep, authentic trust relationships that modern employees expect. Organizations must develop more sophisticated, evidence-based approaches to trust building that address both individual and systemic factors.
The strategic importance of building trust with employees extends far beyond interpersonal relationships to encompass organizational performance, innovation capacity, and long-term sustainability. Research consistently demonstrates that high-trust organizations outperform their low-trust counterparts across multiple dimensions, including employee engagement, customer satisfaction, financial performance, and adaptability to change (Zak, 2017). This evidence base has elevated trust building from a desirable leadership quality to an essential organizational capability requiring systematic development and implementation.
Theoretical Foundations of Workplace Trust
Defining Trust in Organizational Contexts
Trust in organizational settings has been defined as “the willingness of a party to be vulnerable to the actions of another party based on the expectation that the other will perform a particular action important to the trustor, regardless of the ability to monitor or control that other party” (Mayer, Davis, & Schoorman, 1995, p. 712). This definition emphasizes the fundamental elements of vulnerability, expectation, and interdependence that characterize trust relationships in workplace contexts.
The multidimensional nature of organizational trust encompasses cognitive, affective, and behavioral components. Cognitive trust is based on rational evaluation of another party’s competence, reliability, and dependability. Affective trust involves emotional bonds and genuine care for the other party’s well-being. Behavioral trust manifests through actions that demonstrate confidence in the trustworthy party, such as delegation, information sharing, and risk-taking behaviors.
Trust exists at multiple organizational levels, including interpersonal trust between individuals, team trust among group members, and institutional trust in organizational systems and leadership. Building trust with employees requires attention to all these levels, as trust dynamics at different levels interact and influence each other in complex ways. Leaders must understand these multilevel trust dynamics to develop comprehensive trust-building strategies.
The Mayer-Davis-Schoorman Model of Trust
The integrative model of organizational trust developed by Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman (1995) remains the most influential theoretical framework for understanding trust formation and maintenance in workplace settings. This model identifies three primary trustworthiness factors that influence employees’ trust in their leaders: ability, benevolence, and integrity. Each factor contributes uniquely to overall trust perceptions and requires different trust-building strategies.
Ability refers to the group of skills, competencies, and characteristics that enable a party to have influence within a specific domain. In organizational contexts, ability encompasses technical competence, leadership skills, and the capacity to make effective decisions. Employees’ perceptions of their leaders’ ability are based on demonstrated expertise, past performance, and observable competencies relevant to their organizational roles.
Benevolence is the extent to which a trustee is believed to want to do good to the trustor, aside from an egocentric profit motive. This dimension captures the degree to which leaders are perceived as caring about their employees’ well-being and acting in their best interests. Benevolent leaders demonstrate genuine concern for employee development, support their career aspirations, and make decisions that consider employee welfare alongside organizational objectives.
Integrity involves the trustor’s perception that the trustee adheres to a set of principles that the trustor finds acceptable. This dimension encompasses consistency between words and actions, honest communication, and adherence to ethical principles. Leaders who demonstrate integrity maintain consistency between their espoused values and actual behaviors, communicate transparently, and make decisions based on moral principles rather than mere expediency.
Trust Development Processes
Trust development follows predictable patterns that involve initial trust formation, trust maintenance, and trust repair or restoration. Initial trust formation often occurs during early interactions and is influenced by reputation, credentials, and first impressions. This initial trust may be based on limited information and can be fragile, requiring careful nurturing to develop into deeper, more stable trust relationships.
Trust maintenance involves ongoing behaviors and interactions that reinforce or undermine existing trust levels. Consistent demonstration of trustworthy behaviors strengthens trust over time, while violations or inconsistencies can erode trust. The cumulative nature of trust means that building strong trust relationships requires sustained effort and consistency across multiple interactions and contexts.
Trust repair becomes necessary when trust violations occur, whether through broken promises, deceptive behavior, or incompetent performance. Research has identified several factors that influence the effectiveness of trust repair efforts, including the severity of the violation, the trustee’s response to the violation, and the history of the relationship (Kim, Ferrin, Cooper, & Dirks, 2004). Successful trust repair typically requires acknowledgment of the violation, acceptance of responsibility, and demonstration of corrective actions.
Antecedents and Drivers of Employee Trust
Leadership Behaviors and Trust Building
Leadership behavior serves as the primary driver of employee trust, with specific behaviors consistently associated with higher trust levels across diverse organizational contexts. Transformational leadership behaviors, including idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration, are particularly effective in building employee trust (Dirks & Ferrin, 2002). These behaviors demonstrate care for employees, inspire confidence in the leader’s vision, and create conditions for positive trust relationships.
Authentic leadership represents another crucial factor in building trust with employees. Authentic leaders demonstrate self-awareness, relational transparency, balanced processing, and moral perspective, all of which contribute to perceptions of integrity and benevolence (Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing, & Peterson, 2008). Employees trust leaders who are genuine, open about their strengths and limitations, and consistent in their values and behaviors across different situations.
Communication behaviors play a particularly important role in trust building, with open, honest, and frequent communication strongly associated with higher trust levels. Leaders who share information transparently, listen actively to employee concerns, and communicate bad news honestly tend to build stronger trust relationships. Conversely, communication that is perceived as manipulative, incomplete, or dishonest quickly erodes trust and can be difficult to repair.
Organizational Systems and Practices
While individual leader behaviors are crucial for building trust with employees, organizational systems and practices also significantly influence trust development. Fair and consistent human resource practices, including performance management, compensation, and promotion decisions, contribute to institutional trust by demonstrating organizational integrity and benevolence. Employees need to trust not only their immediate supervisors but also the broader organizational systems that affect their work experiences.
Organizational support systems, including employee assistance programs, professional development opportunities, and work-life balance initiatives, signal organizational benevolence and contribute to employee trust. These programs demonstrate that the organization cares about employee well-being beyond their direct contributions to organizational objectives. The quality and accessibility of these programs influence employee perceptions of organizational trustworthiness.
Participative decision-making processes can enhance trust by demonstrating respect for employee input and increasing transparency in organizational decision-making. When employees understand how decisions are made and feel that their perspectives are valued, they develop greater trust in organizational leadership. However, participative processes must be genuine; superficial consultation that ignores employee input can actually damage trust.
Cultural and Individual Factors
Cultural factors significantly influence trust expectations and trust-building processes, both at the national and organizational levels. Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, particularly power distance and uncertainty avoidance, affect how employees expect to interact with authority figures and their comfort with vulnerability in workplace relationships (Hofstede, Hofstede, & Minkov, 2010). Leaders must understand these cultural influences to develop culturally sensitive trust-building approaches.
Individual differences in propensity to trust, based on personality factors and past experiences, affect how employees respond to trust-building efforts. Some employees are naturally more trusting and require less evidence of trustworthiness, while others are more skeptical and need extensive demonstration of trustworthy behavior. Leaders must adapt their trust-building strategies to accommodate these individual differences while maintaining consistency in their core trustworthy behaviors.
Generational differences in trust expectations have become increasingly important as organizations manage multi-generational workforces. Younger employees often expect more transparency and authenticity from their leaders and may be less deferential to authority based solely on position. Understanding these generational differences helps leaders tailor their trust-building approaches to different employee groups while maintaining overall consistency.
Strategies for Building Trust with Employees
Communication-Based Trust Building
Effective communication serves as the cornerstone of building trust with employees, requiring both strategic planning and skilled execution across multiple channels and contexts. Transparent communication, characterized by openness, honesty, and completeness, consistently emerges as one of the most powerful trust-building strategies. Leaders must share information proactively, including both positive developments and challenging news, to demonstrate integrity and build credibility with their employees.
Active listening represents another crucial communication skill for trust building, as it demonstrates respect for employee perspectives and creates psychological safety for open dialogue. Leaders who listen attentively to employee concerns, ask clarifying questions, and respond thoughtfully to feedback create conditions for stronger trust relationships. This requires moving beyond superficial listening to genuine engagement with employee perspectives and concerns.
Regular, consistent communication helps build trust by creating predictability and demonstrating ongoing commitment to the relationship. This might include scheduled one-on-one meetings, team updates, town halls, and informal check-ins. The key is maintaining consistency in both frequency and quality of communication, as irregular or superficial communication can actually undermine trust by creating uncertainty and doubt about leader commitment.
Behavioral Consistency and Reliability
Building trust with employees requires consistent demonstration of trustworthy behaviors across different situations and over extended periods. Reliability in keeping commitments, meeting deadlines, and following through on promises is fundamental to establishing credibility and demonstrating integrity. Leaders must be careful not to make commitments they cannot keep and must communicate promptly when circumstances require changes to previous commitments.
Consistency between espoused values and actual behaviors is particularly crucial for trust building. Employees quickly detect discrepancies between what leaders say and what they do, and such inconsistencies can severely damage trust relationships. Leaders must ensure that their daily decisions and actions reflect their stated values and principles, even when facing difficult or pressuring situations.
Fairness and equitable treatment of all employees contributes significantly to trust building by demonstrating benevolence and integrity. This includes consistent application of policies and procedures, equitable distribution of opportunities and resources, and fair resolution of conflicts and grievances. Perceived favoritism or unfair treatment can quickly erode trust and create lasting damage to leader-employee relationships.
Empowerment and Delegation
Strategic empowerment and delegation serve as powerful trust-building strategies by demonstrating confidence in employee capabilities and creating opportunities for professional growth. When leaders delegate meaningful responsibilities to employees, they signal trust in their abilities and create conditions for reciprocal trust development. However, effective delegation requires careful planning, clear expectations, and appropriate support to ensure success.
Providing employees with decision-making authority within appropriate boundaries demonstrates respect for their judgment and contributes to their sense of organizational ownership. This empowerment must be genuine rather than superficial, with leaders truly allowing employees to make decisions and learn from both successes and failures. Micromanagement after delegation quickly undermines trust and signals lack of confidence in employee capabilities.
Supporting employee development through training, mentoring, and stretch assignments demonstrates benevolence and long-term commitment to employee success. Leaders who invest in their employees’ professional growth build stronger trust relationships and create more capable, engaged teams. This investment must be sustained over time and aligned with employee career aspirations to maximize trust-building impact.
Measuring and Assessing Employee Trust
Quantitative Trust Assessment Methods
Measuring employee trust requires sophisticated methodologies that can capture both the cognitive and affective dimensions of trust relationships. Several validated instruments have been developed for assessing trust in organizational settings, each with specific strengths and applications. The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI) developed by Cummings and Bromiley (1996) measures trust through belief, affect, and intention components, providing comprehensive assessment of trust relationships.
The Trust in Leadership Scale focuses specifically on employee trust in organizational leaders and has been extensively validated across diverse organizational contexts (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Moorman, & Fetter, 1990). This instrument measures perceptions of leader trustworthiness and trust-related behaviors, making it particularly useful for assessing the effectiveness of trust-building interventions targeted at leadership development.
Employee engagement surveys often include trust-related items that provide insights into trust levels within organizations. These surveys typically assess employee perceptions of leadership credibility, organizational support, and psychological safety. While not as comprehensive as dedicated trust instruments, engagement surveys provide practical measures that can be tracked over time and linked to organizational outcomes.
Qualitative Assessment Approaches
Qualitative methods provide rich insights into the nuanced aspects of trust relationships that may not be captured through quantitative measures alone. Focus groups and in-depth interviews can reveal the specific behaviors and experiences that influence employee trust perceptions. These methods are particularly valuable for understanding trust dynamics in diverse or complex organizational contexts.
360-degree feedback processes can provide comprehensive assessment of leader trustworthiness from multiple perspectives, including subordinates, peers, and superiors. When properly designed, these assessments include specific behavioral indicators of trustworthiness and provide actionable feedback for trust-building development. The confidential nature of 360-degree feedback encourages honest assessment that might not emerge through other methods.
Behavioral observation and ethnographic approaches can identify trust-related behaviors and interactions that occur in natural work settings. These methods are particularly useful for understanding how trust manifests in daily work interactions and for identifying gaps between espoused trust-building intentions and actual behaviors.
Trust Metrics and Key Performance Indicators
Organizations increasingly recognize the need for specific metrics that track trust levels and their relationship to business outcomes. Trust-related key performance indicators might include employee retention rates, internal promotion rates, grievance frequency, and participation rates in voluntary programs. These behavioral indicators provide objective measures that complement subjective trust assessments.
Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) serves as a useful proxy for trust, as employees who trust their organization are more likely to recommend it as a place to work. This metric is easy to track over time and can be segmented by department, manager, or other relevant categories to identify trust-building opportunities and successes.
Pulse surveys conducted at regular intervals can track changes in trust levels and identify emerging trust issues before they become significant problems. These brief, frequent assessments provide more timely feedback than annual surveys and enable more responsive trust-building interventions. The key is selecting trust-related questions that provide meaningful insights while avoiding survey fatigue.
Trust Building in Diverse Organizational Contexts
Remote and Virtual Work Environments
The shift toward remote and hybrid work arrangements has fundamentally challenged traditional approaches to building trust with employees. Physical proximity and informal interactions have historically played important roles in trust development, requiring new strategies for creating trust in virtual environments. Leaders must develop competencies in building trust through digital communication channels while maintaining the authenticity and consistency essential for trust relationships.
Virtual trust building requires more deliberate and structured approaches to communication and relationship development. Regular video conferences, virtual office hours, and structured check-ins help maintain connection and demonstrate ongoing commitment to employee relationships. Leaders must be more intentional about sharing information and providing feedback in remote environments where casual interactions are less frequent.
Technology tools can both support and hinder trust building in remote work environments. Collaboration platforms that facilitate transparency and information sharing can enhance trust by providing visibility into work processes and decision-making. However, surveillance technologies that monitor employee activity can undermine trust by signaling lack of confidence in employee commitment and professionalism.
Cross-Cultural Trust Building
Building trust with employees in culturally diverse or global organizations requires understanding and accommodating different cultural expectations regarding authority relationships, communication styles, and trust development processes. High-context cultures may require more relationship-building time before trust develops, while low-context cultures may focus more on task-related competence and reliability.
Power distance cultural dimensions significantly influence trust expectations, with employees from high power distance cultures potentially having different expectations for leader accessibility and transparency. Leaders must adapt their trust-building approaches while maintaining consistency in core trustworthy behaviors. This requires cultural intelligence and sensitivity to avoid misunderstandings that could damage trust relationships.
Language barriers and communication differences can complicate trust building in multicultural environments. Leaders must ensure that communication is clear and accessible to all employees, potentially requiring translation services or simplified communication approaches. Misunderstandings due to language barriers can quickly erode trust if not addressed promptly and sensitively.
Crisis and Change Management
Organizational crises and major changes present both significant challenges and important opportunities for building trust with employees. How leaders respond to crises often defines trust relationships for years to come, making crisis communication and decision-making critical trust-building moments. Transparent, timely, and honest communication during crises demonstrates integrity and builds long-term trust even when delivering difficult news.
Change management initiatives require special attention to trust building, as organizational changes often create uncertainty and anxiety that can erode existing trust relationships. Leaders must communicate the rationale for change clearly, involve employees in planning processes where appropriate, and demonstrate consistency between change messaging and actual implementation. Broken promises during change initiatives can cause lasting damage to trust relationships.
Supporting employees through difficult transitions demonstrates benevolence and builds trust through challenging periods. This might include providing additional training, offering career transition services, or simply being more available for individual support and guidance. Leaders who support their employees during difficult times often emerge with stronger trust relationships despite the challenges faced.
Contemporary Challenges and Future Directions
Technology and Trust
The increasing integration of technology into workplace processes presents new challenges and opportunities for building trust with employees. Artificial intelligence and automated decision-making systems raise questions about fairness, transparency, and human agency that can affect trust in organizational leadership. Leaders must help employees understand how technology is being used and ensure that technological implementations align with organizational values and employee interests.
Data privacy and security concerns have become increasingly important factors in employee trust, particularly as organizations collect more data about employee behavior and performance. Transparent data policies, strong security measures, and clear communication about data use are essential for maintaining trust in technology-enabled work environments. Violations of employee privacy can cause severe and lasting damage to trust relationships.
The potential for technology to either enhance or diminmine human connection in workplace relationships requires careful consideration in trust-building strategies. While technology can facilitate communication and collaboration, over-reliance on technological solutions can reduce the human connection that is essential for deep trust relationships. Leaders must find appropriate balance between technological efficiency and human relationship building.
Generational and Demographic Shifts
Changing workforce demographics and generational differences in work expectations require evolved approaches to building trust with employees. Younger employees often expect more transparency, authenticity, and social responsibility from their employers, while older employees may value stability and traditional authority relationships. Leaders must develop trust-building strategies that address diverse expectations while maintaining consistency in core behaviors.
The increasing prevalence of gig work and non-traditional employment arrangements challenges conventional approaches to building trust with employees. Contract workers, freelancers, and temporary employees may have different trust expectations and require different approaches to relationship building. Organizations must develop inclusive trust-building strategies that encompass all categories of workers.
Growing awareness of social justice issues and corporate social responsibility affects employee trust expectations, particularly among younger and more diverse employee populations. Organizations and leaders must demonstrate authentic commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion to build trust with increasingly diverse workforces. Superficial or insincere efforts in these areas can actually damage trust relationships.
Organizational Resilience and Adaptability
Building trust with employees increasingly requires demonstrating organizational resilience and adaptability in the face of rapid change and uncertainty. Employees need to trust that their organizations and leaders can navigate challenges successfully while protecting employee interests. This requires transparent communication about organizational challenges and clear demonstration of adaptive capabilities.
The ability to maintain trust relationships during periods of ambiguity and change has become a critical leadership competency. Leaders must learn to communicate effectively even when they don’t have complete information and to maintain credibility while adapting to changing circumstances. This requires balancing honesty about uncertainties with confidence in the organization’s ability to address challenges.
Sustainable trust building requires long-term thinking and investment in relationship development rather than short-term transactional approaches. Organizations that view trust building as an ongoing strategic investment rather than a tactical intervention are more likely to develop resilient, high-performance cultures that can adapt to future challenges while maintaining strong employee relationships.
Conclusion
Building trust with employees represents one of the most fundamental and impactful capabilities that leaders and organizations can develop. This comprehensive examination has revealed that trust building is both a complex psychological process and a practical organizational competency that requires sustained attention, systematic development, and continuous refinement. The theoretical foundations established by researchers like Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman provide clear guidance for understanding trust dynamics, while contemporary research continues to expand our knowledge of trust-building strategies and applications.
The evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that organizations and leaders who successfully build trust with employees achieve superior outcomes across multiple dimensions of organizational effectiveness. High-trust organizations experience enhanced employee engagement, improved performance, reduced turnover, greater innovation, and increased resilience in the face of challenges. These outcomes justify the significant investments required to develop comprehensive trust-building capabilities and make trust building a strategic imperative for organizational success.
The challenges facing contemporary organizations—including remote work arrangements, cultural diversity, rapid change, and technological transformation—require evolved approaches to trust building that maintain effectiveness while adapting to new realities. Leaders must develop sophisticated competencies in virtual relationship building, cross-cultural communication, change management, and technology integration while maintaining consistency in the core trustworthy behaviors of ability, benevolence, and integrity.
The future of building trust with employees will likely involve greater integration of technology for measurement and intervention, increased attention to inclusive and culturally sensitive approaches, and continued evolution of trust-building strategies to address emerging workplace trends. However, the fundamental human need for trustworthy relationships will remain constant, making the development of authentic, consistent, and caring leadership behaviors eternally relevant for organizational success. Organizations that master these capabilities while adapting to contemporary challenges will achieve sustainable competitive advantages through their ability to build and maintain strong trust relationships with all employees.
References
- Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 302-330). Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/trust-in-organizations/book4486
- Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-18026-001
- Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://www.mcgraw-hill.com/higher-ed/product/cultures-organizations-software-mind-hofstede-hofstede/M9780071664189.html
- Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 104-118. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-10345-011
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/104898439090009-7
- Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0149206307308913
- Zak, P. J. (2017). The trust factor: The science of creating high-performance companies. AMACOM. https://www.amanet.org/books/the-trust-factor-the-science-of-creating-high-performance-companies/
- Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.routledge.com/Transformational-Leadership/Bass-Riggio/p/book/9780805847628
- Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909-927. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-09210-002
- Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (Eds.). (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/trust-in-organizations/book4486
- Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 114-139). Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/trust-in-organizations/book4486
- McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59. https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/256727
- Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404. https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
- Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344-354. https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amr.2007.24348410
- Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 513-530. https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amr.1998.926624