The MODE Model (Motivation and Opportunity as Determinants of the attitude-behavior relation) represents a significant theoretical framework in social psychology that explains when and how attitudes predict behavior through different processing routes. Developed by Russell Fazio, this influential model addresses the fundamental question of attitude-behavior consistency by proposing that the relationship between attitudes and behavior depends on individuals’ motivation and opportunity to engage in deliberative processing. The MODE Model distinguishes between spontaneous and deliberative processes, arguing that attitudes influence behavior through automatic activation when motivation or opportunity for careful consideration is low, while deliberative reasoning processes dominate when both motivation and opportunity are high. This dual-process approach has revolutionized understanding of how attitudes translate into behavior across various social contexts, from consumer decision-making to intergroup relations. The model incorporates key concepts such as attitude accessibility, attitude strength, and processing motivation that determine which route to behavior will be activated. Research supporting the MODE Model has demonstrated its utility in explaining diverse phenomena including prejudice and discrimination, health behavior change, political decision-making, and consumer behavior. Contemporary applications of the model continue to inform interventions designed to promote attitude-behavior consistency and behavior change across numerous domains of social psychology research and practice.
Introduction
The relationship between attitudes and behavior has been one of the most enduring and challenging questions in social psychology since the field’s inception. Early researchers assumed a direct correspondence between what people think and feel about attitude objects and how they behave toward those objects. However, decades of research revealed that this relationship is far more complex than initially anticipated, leading to sophisticated theoretical frameworks that attempt to explain when and why attitudes predict behavior.
The MODE Model emerged from this rich tradition of attitude-behavior research as a comprehensive framework for understanding the conditions under which attitudes influence behavior. Developed by Russell Fazio and his colleagues, the MODE Model represents a significant advance in social psychology theory by providing a dual-process account of how attitudes translate into behavior through different cognitive pathways.
The significance of the MODE Model extends beyond its theoretical contributions to its practical implications for understanding real-world behavior across diverse domains. From predicting consumer purchasing decisions to understanding when stereotypes influence intergroup behavior, the MODE Model has provided valuable insights into the psychological mechanisms underlying attitude-behavior relationships in social contexts.
The development of the MODE Model was motivated by the need to reconcile conflicting findings in the attitude-behavior literature and to provide a more nuanced understanding of the conditions that moderate this important relationship. Rather than assuming a single pathway from attitudes to behavior, the model recognizes that different psychological processes may operate under different circumstances.
Understanding the MODE Model is essential for contemporary social psychology research and practice because it provides frameworks for predicting behavior, designing effective interventions, and understanding the complex interplay between conscious and automatic processes that shape human social behavior. The model’s emphasis on both motivational and cognitive factors makes it particularly relevant for applied contexts where behavior change is a primary goal.
Theoretical Background and Development
Historical Context in Attitude Research
The MODE Model emerged from a long history of research examining the relationship between attitudes and behavior, a relationship that proved to be more complex and conditional than early researchers anticipated. The foundational assumption that attitudes directly predict behavior was challenged by influential studies, including Richard LaPiere’s classic 1934 study that found discrepancies between expressed racial attitudes and actual discriminatory behavior.
This early research revealed that the attitude-behavior relationship was weaker and more variable than expected, leading to what became known as the “attitude-behavior problem” in social psychology. Various factors were identified as potential moderators of this relationship, including situational constraints, social norms, and individual differences in attitude strength and accessibility.
The development of sophisticated attitude theories during the 1960s and 1970s, including Leon Festinger’s cognitive dissonance theory and Martin Fishbein and Icek Ajzen’s theory of reasoned action, contributed important insights about the conditions under which attitudes influence behavior. These theories emphasized the role of deliberative processes and rational decision-making in attitude-behavior relationships.
However, growing recognition of automatic and unconscious processes in social cognition during the 1980s and 1990s created need for theoretical frameworks that could account for both controlled and automatic pathways from attitudes to behavior. This recognition set the stage for dual-process models like the MODE Model that could explain attitude-behavior relationships under different processing conditions.
The broader context of dual-process theories in social psychology, including models of persuasion, person perception, and social judgment, provided theoretical foundations for understanding how different types of processing might influence attitude-behavior relationships. These developments created the intellectual climate for the MODE Model’s emergence and acceptance.
Russell Fazio’s Theoretical Contributions
Russell Fazio’s development of the MODE Model built upon his extensive research on attitude accessibility and automatic attitude activation. His early work demonstrated that attitudes vary in their accessibility from memory and that more accessible attitudes are more likely to influence behavior and judgment.
Fazio’s research on attitude accessibility revealed that attitudes that come to mind quickly and spontaneously when encountering attitude objects have stronger influences on behavior than attitudes that require effortful retrieval from memory. This work established attitude accessibility as a crucial individual difference variable that moderates attitude-behavior relationships.
The concept of automatic attitude activation, developed through Fazio’s research using priming methodology, demonstrated that attitudes can influence behavior through unconscious, spontaneous processes that operate without deliberate intention or awareness. This research provided empirical foundations for understanding automatic pathways from attitudes to behavior.
Fazio’s integration of accessibility research with broader theoretical developments in social cognition led to recognition that attitude-behavior relationships might operate through multiple pathways, depending on the availability of cognitive resources and processing motivation. This insight became central to the MODE Model’s theoretical framework.
The MODE Model represents Fazio’s attempt to create a comprehensive theoretical framework that could account for both automatic and controlled influences of attitudes on behavior while specifying the conditions under which each type of process would be most likely to operate.
Integration with Dual-Process Theories
The MODE Model aligns with broader dual-process theories in social psychology that distinguish between automatic, heuristic processing and controlled, systematic processing. This integration positioned the MODE Model within a larger theoretical framework that was gaining prominence across multiple areas of social psychological research.
Dual-process theories of persuasion, including the Elaboration Likelihood Model and the Heuristic-Systematic Model, provided conceptual foundations for understanding how processing motivation and ability influence attitude change. The MODE Model extended these insights to attitude-behavior relationships, arguing that similar factors influence how attitudes translate into behavior.
Social cognition research on automatic and controlled processes contributed important insights about the conditions that promote different types of processing and the consequences of each type for judgment and behavior. This research provided empirical support for the MODE Model’s core assumptions about dual processing pathways.
The MODE Model’s integration with dual-process theories helped establish it as part of a coherent theoretical approach to understanding social psychological phenomena rather than an isolated framework specific to attitude-behavior relationships. This integration enhanced the model’s theoretical credibility and empirical support.
Core Components and Mechanisms
The MODE Acronym: Motivation and Opportunity
The MODE Model’s name reflects its central proposition that Motivation and Opportunity serve as Determinants of the attitude-behavior relationship. These two factors determine whether attitude-behavior relationships will be mediated by deliberative or spontaneous processes.
Motivation refers to individuals’ willingness to engage in effortful, systematic processing of relevant information before acting. High motivation might result from personal involvement with the attitude object, accountability for decisions, or need for accuracy in judgment and behavior. Low motivation occurs when individuals have limited interest in the outcome or feel that careful consideration is unnecessary.
Opportunity refers to the availability of cognitive resources and sufficient time to engage in deliberative processing. High opportunity exists when individuals have adequate time, minimal distractions, and sufficient cognitive capacity to carefully consider their attitudes and their implications for behavior. Low opportunity occurs under time pressure, cognitive load, or other conditions that prevent careful deliberation.
The interaction between motivation and opportunity determines which processing route will dominate attitude-behavior relationships. When both motivation and opportunity are high, deliberative processing is likely to mediate the attitude-behavior relationship. When either motivation or opportunity is low, spontaneous processing is more likely to determine behavior.
This two-factor framework provides a parsimonious yet comprehensive account of the conditions that influence attitude-behavior relationships while also specifying the psychological mechanisms through which these relationships operate under different circumstances.
Spontaneous Processing Route
The spontaneous processing route operates when individuals lack either motivation or opportunity for deliberative consideration of their attitudes and their behavioral implications. Under these conditions, attitudes influence behavior through automatic activation and spontaneous evaluative responses to attitude objects.
Attitude accessibility plays a crucial role in the spontaneous processing route, as more accessible attitudes are more likely to be automatically activated when individuals encounter relevant attitude objects. This automatic activation creates an evaluative response that can guide behavior without conscious intention or awareness.
The spontaneous route is characterized by relatively little cognitive effort and operates quickly and efficiently. Individuals may not be aware that their attitudes are influencing their behavior, and they may have limited ability to control or override these automatic influences.
Environmental cues and contextual factors play important roles in the spontaneous processing route by triggering automatic attitude activation. The presence of attitude objects, situational primes, or environmental features associated with attitude objects can activate attitudes and influence behavior without deliberate consideration.
Research on implicit attitudes and automatic evaluation has provided extensive support for the spontaneous processing route, demonstrating that attitudes can influence behavior through unconscious processes that operate outside of deliberate control.
Deliberative Processing Route
The deliberative processing route operates when individuals have both motivation and opportunity to carefully consider their attitudes and their implications for behavior. Under these conditions, individuals engage in systematic processing that involves conscious consideration of relevant information and deliberate decision-making.
The deliberative route is characterized by effortful cognitive processing that takes time and requires cognitive resources. Individuals actively retrieve and consider their attitudes, evaluate the costs and benefits of different behavioral options, and make conscious decisions about how to behave.
Social norms, situational constraints, and practical considerations play important roles in the deliberative processing route as individuals consider multiple factors that might influence their behavioral choices. This comprehensive consideration can lead to behaviors that differ from those that would result from spontaneous attitude activation alone.
The theory of planned behavior and other rational choice models of attitude-behavior relationships primarily describe the deliberative processing route, emphasizing conscious decision-making processes that integrate attitudes with other relevant considerations.
Research on deliberative processing has shown that this route can lead to different behavioral outcomes compared to spontaneous processing, particularly when social norms, practical constraints, or other factors conflict with automatic evaluative responses.
Factors Influencing Route Selection
Several individual difference and situational factors influence whether individuals will engage in spontaneous or deliberative processing when their attitudes are relevant to behavior. Understanding these factors is crucial for predicting which processing route will operate in different contexts.
Individual differences in need for cognition, personal involvement, and accountability affect processing motivation and thus influence route selection. Individuals high in need for cognition are more likely to engage in deliberative processing, while those low in need for cognition may rely more heavily on spontaneous processes.
Situational factors such as time pressure, cognitive load, and environmental distractions affect processing opportunity and thus influence route selection. High time pressure or cognitive load promotes spontaneous processing, while conditions that provide adequate time and cognitive resources facilitate deliberative processing.
Attitude characteristics, including attitude strength, accessibility, and ambivalence, influence both processing motivation and the relative influence of spontaneous versus deliberative routes. Strong, accessible attitudes are more likely to influence behavior through spontaneous processing, while ambivalent attitudes may promote deliberative processing.
The importance of behavioral decisions and their consequences also influences processing route selection. Important decisions with significant consequences are more likely to promote deliberative processing, while routine or low-stakes behaviors may be guided primarily by spontaneous processes.
Research Evidence and Empirical Support
Laboratory Studies and Experimental Evidence
Extensive laboratory research has provided strong empirical support for the MODE Model’s core propositions, demonstrating that processing route affects attitude-behavior relationships in predicted ways. These studies have used various experimental manipulations to influence motivation and opportunity while measuring attitude-behavior consistency.
Studies manipulating processing motivation through accountability instructions, personal involvement, or outcome importance have shown that high motivation promotes deliberative processing and can reduce the influence of automatically activated attitudes on behavior. These studies demonstrate that motivation affects not just whether people think carefully but also how their attitudes translate into behavior.
Research manipulating processing opportunity through time pressure, cognitive load, or distraction has consistently shown that low opportunity promotes spontaneous processing and increases the influence of accessible attitudes on behavior. These studies provide clear evidence for the MODE Model’s predictions about opportunity effects.
Priming studies have demonstrated automatic attitude activation and its behavioral consequences under conditions of low motivation or opportunity. These studies show that attitudes can influence behavior without conscious awareness or intention, supporting the spontaneous processing route described by the MODE Model.
Studies examining the interaction between motivation and opportunity have provided particularly strong support for the MODE Model by showing that both factors must be present for deliberative processing to dominate attitude-behavior relationships.
Field Studies and Real-World Applications
Field studies conducted in naturalistic settings have extended laboratory findings to real-world contexts, demonstrating the MODE Model’s applicability to important social behaviors including prejudice and discrimination, health behavior, and consumer decision-making.
Research on prejudice and intergroup behavior has shown that stereotype-based discrimination is more likely under conditions that promote spontaneous processing, while deliberative processing can reduce discriminatory behavior by allowing individuals to consider egalitarian values and social norms.
Health behavior research has applied the MODE Model to understand when health attitudes predict actual health behaviors. Studies have shown that accessible health attitudes predict behavior under spontaneous processing conditions, while deliberative processing allows individuals to consider multiple factors that may override immediate attitudinal responses.
Consumer behavior research has used the MODE Model to understand purchasing decisions, brand choices, and consumer preferences. Studies have shown that brand attitudes influence purchasing behavior more strongly under spontaneous processing conditions, while deliberative processing allows consideration of price, quality, and other factors.
Political behavior research has applied the MODE Model to voting behavior, policy preferences, and political participation, showing that political attitudes predict behavior differently depending on processing conditions and the availability of cognitive resources.
Meta-Analytic Evidence
Meta-analytic reviews have provided comprehensive evidence for the MODE Model’s predictions by synthesizing findings across multiple studies and contexts. These reviews have quantified effect sizes and identified moderating factors that influence the strength of MODE Model predictions.
Meta-analyses of attitude accessibility effects have confirmed that accessible attitudes predict behavior more strongly than inaccessible attitudes, particularly under conditions that promote spontaneous processing. These analyses provide strong support for the role of accessibility in the spontaneous processing route.
Reviews of dual-process theories in social psychology have positioned the MODE Model within the broader context of dual-process approaches, showing consistency between MODE Model findings and results from other dual-process theories.
Meta-analytic evidence has also identified boundary conditions for MODE Model predictions, showing that effect sizes vary depending on attitude domain, behavioral context, and measurement characteristics. These analyses have contributed to theoretical refinement and improved understanding of when MODE Model predictions are most likely to hold.
Applications Across Domains
Prejudice and Intergroup Relations
The MODE Model has been extensively applied to understand when and how prejudiced attitudes translate into discriminatory behavior in intergroup contexts. This application has provided important insights into the automatic and controlled components of prejudice and discrimination.
Research has shown that implicit prejudicial attitudes are more likely to predict discriminatory behavior under conditions that promote spontaneous processing, such as time pressure, cognitive load, or minimal motivation to appear unprejudiced. These findings help explain why discrimination can persist despite explicit egalitarian attitudes.
Studies of stereotype activation and application have used the MODE Model framework to understand when stereotypes influence judgment and behavior. Accessible stereotypes are more likely to influence behavior through spontaneous processing, while deliberative processing allows individuals to correct for stereotypical biases.
Applications to hiring decisions, medical treatment, and legal judgments have shown that MODE Model principles can help predict and potentially reduce discriminatory behavior in important institutional contexts. Interventions that promote deliberative processing or reduce the accessibility of prejudicial attitudes can decrease discrimination.
The MODE Model has also been applied to understand positive intergroup behaviors such as helping and cooperation, showing that positive intergroup attitudes are more likely to predict prosocial behavior under conditions that promote spontaneous processing.
Health Behavior and Behavior Change
Health psychology applications of the MODE Model have examined when health attitudes predict actual health behaviors and how behavior change interventions can be designed to maximize attitude-behavior consistency.
Research on health behavior has shown that accessible health attitudes predict behavior more strongly under spontaneous processing conditions, while deliberative processing allows individuals to consider barriers, social norms, and competing goals that may override health attitudes.
Applications to smoking cessation, exercise behavior, and dietary choices have demonstrated that MODE Model principles can inform the design of effective behavior change interventions. Interventions that increase the accessibility of positive health attitudes or promote deliberative processing can enhance behavior change.
Studies of health decision-making have used the MODE Model to understand when patients follow medical recommendations and when they engage in preventive health behaviors. The model helps predict which patients are most likely to adhere to treatment regimens under different circumstances.
The MODE Model has also been applied to understand health risk behaviors, showing that accessible risk attitudes can promote risky behaviors through spontaneous processing, while deliberative processing allows consideration of long-term consequences and social norms.
Consumer Behavior and Marketing
Consumer psychology applications of the MODE Model have examined how consumer attitudes translate into purchasing decisions and brand choices under different shopping and decision-making conditions.
Research has shown that brand attitudes formed through advertising exposure are more likely to influence purchasing behavior under conditions that promote spontaneous processing, such as time pressure or routine shopping contexts. This finding has important implications for marketing strategy and advertising effectiveness.
Studies of impulse purchasing have used the MODE Model to understand when consumers make unplanned purchases based on immediate evaluative responses versus deliberative consideration of needs and budget constraints. Accessible product attitudes predict impulse purchasing under low motivation or opportunity conditions.
Applications to consumer choice have shown that the MODE Model can help predict when consumers will choose preferred brands versus making decisions based on price, convenience, or other factors that emerge during deliberative processing.
The model has also been applied to understand consumer responses to social and environmental issues, showing when values-based attitudes predict purchasing decisions versus when other factors override these concerns.
Political Behavior and Civic Engagement
Political psychology applications of the MODE Model have examined when political attitudes predict voting behavior, policy support, and political participation under different information and motivation conditions.
Research on voting behavior has shown that accessible candidate evaluations and party identifications are more likely to predict vote choice under conditions that promote spontaneous processing, such as low information elections or time pressure in voting booths.
Studies of policy attitudes have used the MODE Model to understand when citizens’ policy preferences predict their political behavior and when other factors such as party loyalty or candidate characteristics override policy attitudes.
Applications to political participation have shown that accessible political attitudes predict participation in political activities under spontaneous processing conditions, while deliberative processing allows consideration of costs, benefits, and competing commitments.
The MODE Model has also been applied to understand political persuasion and attitude change, showing when political communications are most likely to influence behavior through automatic versus deliberative processing routes.
Contemporary Developments and Extensions
Neuroscientific Evidence and Brain Imaging
Recent neuroscientific research has provided biological evidence for the dual-process distinctions central to the MODE Model by identifying different brain systems involved in spontaneous versus deliberative attitude-behavior processes.
Neuroimaging studies have shown that spontaneous attitude activation involves subcortical structures including the amygdala and other emotion-related brain regions, while deliberative processing engages prefrontal cortical areas associated with executive control and working memory.
Research using electroencephalography (EEG) and other neuroscience methods has identified neural markers of automatic versus controlled processing that correspond to MODE Model predictions about different processing routes.
Studies of patients with brain lesions have provided additional evidence for distinct neural systems underlying spontaneous and deliberative processing, showing that damage to different brain regions can selectively impair different types of attitude-behavior relationships.
Neuroscientific evidence has generally supported the MODE Model’s theoretical distinctions while providing insights into the biological mechanisms underlying dual-process attitude-behavior relationships.
Cross-Cultural Research and Cultural Considerations
Cross-cultural research has examined whether MODE Model predictions hold across different cultural contexts and how cultural factors might influence the relative importance of spontaneous versus deliberative processing.
Studies comparing individualistic and collectivistic cultures have found both similarities and differences in MODE Model predictions, with cultural values influencing processing motivation and the relative emphasis on automatic versus controlled responses.
Research has examined how cultural factors such as power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term orientation influence the conditions under which individuals engage in deliberative versus spontaneous processing.
Cross-cultural studies have also investigated whether attitude accessibility and automatic activation operate similarly across cultures or whether cultural factors influence these basic cognitive processes.
Overall, cross-cultural research has supported the generalizability of MODE Model predictions while identifying cultural factors that moderate the strength and specific manifestations of dual-process attitude-behavior relationships.
Integration with Other Theoretical Frameworks
Contemporary developments have integrated the MODE Model with other theoretical frameworks in social psychology, creating more comprehensive models of social behavior and attitude-behavior relationships.
Integration with theories of self-regulation and ego depletion has examined how cognitive resources and self-control capacity influence attitude-behavior relationships through MODE Model mechanisms.
Research has connected the MODE Model with theories of motivated reasoning and biased information processing, showing how processing goals and motivations influence both attitude-behavior relationships and information processing.
Studies have integrated MODE Model predictions with social identity theory and other group-based theories to understand how group memberships influence processing motivation and attitude-behavior consistency.
The MODE Model has also been connected with theories of habit and automatic behavior, examining how repeated attitude-behavior associations become automatized and operate through spontaneous processing routes.
Limitations and Future Directions
Theoretical and Methodological Limitations
Despite extensive empirical support, the MODE Model faces several theoretical and methodological challenges that limit its explanatory scope and practical applications.
Measurement challenges include difficulties in assessing processing motivation and opportunity independently of their effects on attitude-behavior relationships, creating potential circularity in some research designs.
The model’s focus on individual-level cognitive processes may underemphasize social, cultural, and structural factors that influence attitude-behavior relationships beyond individual motivation and opportunity.
Temporal dynamics of attitude-behavior relationships are not fully addressed by the MODE Model, which provides limited insight into how processing routes might change over time or across repeated attitude-behavior episodes.
The model’s binary distinction between spontaneous and deliberative processing may oversimplify more complex and nuanced processing that occurs in real-world contexts where multiple factors influence behavior simultaneously.
Future Research Directions
Several promising research directions could extend and refine the MODE Model while addressing current limitations and expanding its theoretical scope.
Research on individual differences in processing style, cognitive capacity, and cultural background could identify additional moderators of MODE Model predictions and improve the model’s predictive accuracy.
Studies of dynamic processes and real-time changes in motivation and opportunity could provide insights into how processing routes shift during attitude-behavior episodes and across repeated exposures.
Integration with emerging theories of embodied cognition, social networks, and environmental influences could expand the MODE Model beyond individual cognitive processes to include broader contextual influences.
Research on intervention design and behavior change applications could develop more effective strategies for promoting attitude-behavior consistency by targeting MODE Model mechanisms.
Investigation of unconscious motivation and opportunity factors could extend the model to include automatic variations in processing route selection that operate below conscious awareness.
Conclusion
The MODE Model has made significant contributions to social psychology by providing a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding when and how attitudes predict behavior. By distinguishing between spontaneous and deliberative processing routes and identifying motivation and opportunity as key determinants of route selection, the model has resolved many inconsistencies in the attitude-behavior literature while generating extensive empirical research.
The model’s dual-process approach reflects broader trends in social psychology toward recognizing both automatic and controlled influences on social behavior. This theoretical perspective has proven valuable not only for understanding attitude-behavior relationships but also for informing practical applications in domains ranging from prejudice reduction to health behavior change.
Empirical research has provided strong support for the MODE Model’s core predictions while also identifying boundary conditions and moderating factors that refine theoretical understanding. Laboratory studies have demonstrated the basic mechanisms proposed by the model, while field studies have shown its relevance to real-world behaviors and contexts.
The model’s applications across diverse domains demonstrate its theoretical utility and practical relevance. From understanding discrimination and prejudice to predicting consumer behavior and political participation, the MODE Model has provided valuable insights into the psychological processes underlying attitude-behavior relationships.
Contemporary developments including neuroscientific evidence, cross-cultural research, and integration with other theoretical frameworks have extended the model’s scope while providing additional empirical support for its core propositions. These developments position the MODE Model as a central component of contemporary dual-process theories in social psychology.
Future research directions offer opportunities to address current limitations while expanding the model’s theoretical scope and practical applications. Continued investigation of individual differences, temporal dynamics, and intervention applications will contribute to more complete understanding of attitude-behavior relationships.
The MODE Model’s legacy includes not only its specific theoretical contributions but also its influence on broader approaches to understanding social psychological phenomena through dual-process frameworks. This influence extends beyond attitude research to affect understanding of social cognition, intergroup relations, and social behavior more generally.
References
- Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1-40). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781315807102/handbook-social-cognition-robert-wyer-thomas-srull
- Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62
- Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60318-4
- Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781410603715/attitude-strength-richard-petty-jon-krosnick
- Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
- Fazio, R. H., & Towles-Schwen, T. (1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 97-116). Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Dual-Process-Theories-in-Social-Psychology/Chaiken-Trope/9781572304215
- Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
- Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 19-63). Psychology Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9780203701379/attitudes-richard-petty-russell-fazio-pablo-briñol
- Perugini, M., & Prestwich, A. (2007). The gatekeeper: Individual differences are key in the chain from perception to behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 21(3), 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.633
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
- Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220-247. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
- Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101