Applied community psychology represents the practical implementation of community psychology principles, theories, and research findings to address real-world social problems and promote positive community change. This field bridges the gap between academic knowledge and community practice by translating theoretical insights from both community psychology and social psychology into evidence-based interventions, programs, and policies. Applied community psychologists work collaboratively with communities to identify strengths, address challenges, and develop sustainable solutions that promote individual and collective well-being. The field encompasses diverse practice domains including prevention programming, community development, organizational consultation, policy advocacy, and program evaluation. Core applications include mental health promotion, violence prevention, substance abuse prevention, educational enhancement, and community capacity building. Applied community psychology emphasizes participatory approaches that engage community members as partners in all phases of intervention design, implementation, and evaluation, while maintaining rigorous scientific standards and cultural responsiveness. Contemporary practice increasingly incorporates technology-enhanced interventions, trauma-informed approaches, and sustainability frameworks to ensure lasting positive impact at individual, organizational, and community levels.
Introduction
Applied Community Psychology emerged as a distinct practice area within the broader field of community psychology, focusing specifically on the translation of research and theory into practical interventions that address pressing social issues (Kloos et al., 2020). Unlike traditional psychology applications that primarily target individual-level change, applied community psychology operates from an ecological perspective that recognizes the complex interactions between individuals and their social environments. This approach draws extensively from social psychology research on group dynamics, social influence, and collective behavior while extending these insights to community-level interventions.
The field’s foundation rests on the principle that many psychological and social problems are best understood and addressed through multi-level interventions that consider individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and societal factors simultaneously. Applied community psychologists serve as bridge-builders between academic research and community practice, working to ensure that scientific knowledge is accessible, relevant, and responsive to community-identified needs and priorities (Trickett, 2009).
Applied community psychology distinguishes itself through its emphasis on prevention rather than treatment, empowerment rather than deficit models, and collaborative partnerships rather than expert-driven approaches. Practitioners in this field work across diverse settings including community-based organizations, schools, healthcare systems, government agencies, and grassroots advocacy groups, always maintaining focus on creating sustainable, positive change that enhances community capacity and well-being.
The contemporary relevance of applied community psychology has grown significantly as communities face increasingly complex challenges including health disparities, social inequality, environmental threats, and technological disruption. These challenges require innovative, evidence-based approaches that can effectively bridge research and practice while honoring community wisdom and cultural diversity (Shinn & Yoshikawa, 2008).
Core Principles and Values
Prevention and Health Promotion
Prevention serves as a cornerstone of applied community psychology practice, reflecting the field’s commitment to addressing problems before they develop rather than focusing solely on treatment after problems have manifested. This preventive orientation draws from public health models while incorporating psychological insights about risk and protective factors that influence individual and community outcomes (Cowen, 2000).
Primary prevention strategies focus on reducing the incidence of problems by addressing underlying conditions that contribute to their development. These approaches typically target entire populations or communities rather than individuals already showing signs of difficulty. Examples include community-wide campaigns to promote mental health literacy, school-based social-emotional learning programs, and environmental modifications that reduce exposure to risk factors such as violence or substance abuse.
Secondary prevention approaches target individuals or groups who show early signs of problems or who are at elevated risk due to specific circumstances or exposures. These interventions aim to prevent the progression of problems from mild to severe while building individual and community capacity to address challenges effectively. Examples might include early intervention programs for children showing behavioral difficulties, support groups for individuals experiencing significant life transitions, or community education programs for populations facing specific health risks.
Tertiary prevention focuses on reducing the negative consequences of existing problems while preventing their recurrence or escalation. While this approach more closely resembles traditional treatment models, applied community psychology tertiary prevention emphasizes community-based, culturally responsive approaches that address environmental factors contributing to problem maintenance. Examples include community-based mental health services, peer support programs for individuals in recovery, and community reintegration programs for individuals leaving institutional settings.
Empowerment and Capacity Building
Empowerment represents both a core value and a practical methodology in applied community psychology, emphasizing the development of individual and collective capacity to address challenges and pursue goals (Zimmerman, 2000). This approach rejects paternalistic models of service delivery in favor of collaborative partnerships that recognize and build upon existing community strengths and resources.
Individual empowerment involves helping people develop the knowledge, skills, confidence, and resources necessary to take control of their lives and advocate for their needs. This might include leadership development programs, skill-building workshops, mentoring relationships, or advocacy training that helps individuals navigate complex systems and access needed resources. Applied community psychologists facilitate these processes while recognizing that individuals are the ultimate experts on their own experiences and needs.
Organizational empowerment focuses on building the capacity of community-based organizations, institutions, and groups to effectively serve their missions and constituencies. This may involve organizational consultation, strategic planning assistance, staff development, or evaluation support that helps organizations improve their effectiveness and sustainability. Applied community psychologists work collaboratively with organizational leaders and members to identify strengths, address challenges, and develop solutions that align with organizational values and community needs.
Community empowerment represents the collective capacity of community members to work together to address shared concerns and pursue common goals. This involves building social networks, developing shared leadership, and creating structures and processes that enable effective collective action. Applied community psychology contributions to community empowerment might include facilitating community organizing efforts, supporting coalition development, or providing technical assistance for community planning and advocacy initiatives.
Cultural Responsiveness and Social Justice
Cultural responsiveness has become increasingly recognized as essential for effective applied community psychology practice, reflecting understanding that interventions must align with community cultural values, beliefs, and practices to be acceptable and effective (Sue & Sue, 2019). This goes beyond surface-level cultural adaptations to involve deep engagement with community cultural frameworks and worldviews.
Cultural assessment and understanding involve ongoing learning about the cultural contexts within which applied community psychologists work, including historical experiences, contemporary challenges, strengths and resources, and cultural approaches to problem-solving and healing. This process requires genuine curiosity, humility, and willingness to be guided by community cultural experts and leaders.
Culturally adapted interventions involve modifying evidence-based approaches to align with specific cultural values, communication styles, and intervention preferences while maintaining core intervention components that contribute to effectiveness. This might involve incorporating traditional practices and beliefs, modifying intervention formats and settings, training culturally representative staff, or developing new approaches that integrate Western psychological principles with indigenous healing practices.
Social justice advocacy represents an essential component of culturally responsive practice, recognizing that many community problems are rooted in systemic inequalities and discrimination that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Applied community psychologists may engage in policy advocacy, organizational consultation, or community organizing efforts designed to address structural barriers and promote more equitable conditions for all community members.
Practice Domains and Applications
Mental Health Promotion and Prevention
Mental health promotion represents one of the most extensively developed applications of applied community psychology, encompassing interventions that build psychological resilience, promote positive mental health, and prevent the development of mental health problems (Keyes, 2007). These approaches move beyond traditional clinical models to address social determinants of mental health while building community capacity for supporting mental wellness.
School-based mental health promotion programs have demonstrated significant effectiveness in building social-emotional competencies, reducing behavioral problems, and improving academic outcomes. These programs typically involve multi-component interventions that include classroom curricula teaching emotional regulation and social skills, school climate improvements that promote positive relationships and belonging, and family engagement strategies that reinforce program messages at home. Applied community psychologists often serve as consultants, evaluators, or implementation coordinators for these initiatives.
Workplace mental health promotion has emerged as an important application area, recognizing that work environments significantly influence employee well-being and that organizational changes can improve mental health outcomes for large numbers of people. These interventions might include stress management training, manager education about mental health, policy changes that promote work-life balance, or environmental modifications that reduce workplace stressors.
Community-based mental health promotion initiatives target entire populations through public education campaigns, community events, and environmental changes that promote positive mental health and reduce stigma associated with mental health challenges. These approaches often involve partnerships among multiple community organizations and may include components such as mental health first aid training, peer support program development, or community asset mapping exercises that identify existing resources and support networks.
Violence Prevention and Community Safety
Violence prevention represents another major application domain for applied community psychology, with interventions addressing multiple forms of violence including intimate partner violence, child abuse, youth violence, and community violence (David-Ferdon & Simon, 2014). Applied community psychology approaches to violence prevention emphasize primary prevention strategies that address root causes rather than focusing solely on responding to violence after it occurs.
Multi-level prevention models guide many applied community psychology violence prevention efforts, recognizing that violence results from complex interactions among individual, relationship, community, and societal factors. Individual-level interventions might focus on building social-emotional skills, conflict resolution abilities, and healthy relationship competencies. Relationship-level interventions address family dynamics, peer influences, and intimate partner relationships through programs such as parenting education, peer mediation, and healthy relationship curricula.
Community-level violence prevention interventions address environmental and structural factors that contribute to violence, including neighborhood deterioration, social disorganization, economic disadvantage, and weak community institutions. These approaches might involve community organizing efforts, environmental design modifications, economic development initiatives, or efforts to strengthen community organizations and informal social networks that provide supervision and support for residents.
School-based violence prevention programs represent particularly well-developed applications of community psychology principles, with comprehensive approaches that address school climate, peer relationships, and individual skill development simultaneously. Effective programs typically include components such as social-emotional learning curricula, positive behavior support systems, anti-bullying initiatives, and efforts to improve school-family-community partnerships.
Community mobilization approaches engage diverse stakeholders in collaborative efforts to address violence and promote community safety through collective action. These initiatives might include resident organizing efforts, community-police partnerships, faith-based violence prevention initiatives, or business community engagement in violence prevention activities.
Substance Abuse Prevention
Community-based substance abuse prevention exemplifies the application of community psychology principles to complex public health challenges, employing ecological approaches that address multiple levels of influence simultaneously (Hawkins et al., 2002). Applied community psychology contributions to substance abuse prevention emphasize evidence-based strategies that modify risk and protective factors at individual, family, school, and community levels.
Risk and protective factor models provide theoretical frameworks that guide intervention development and implementation. Risk factors such as early antisocial behavior, family conflict, academic failure, and community norms tolerant of substance use are targeted for reduction through specific intervention strategies. Protective factors including strong family bonds, school connectedness, involvement in prosocial activities, and community norms that discourage substance use are strengthened through complementary intervention approaches.
Community coalition development represents a widely used strategy for coordinating comprehensive substance abuse prevention efforts across multiple sectors and organizations. Applied community psychologists often facilitate coalition development processes, provide evaluation and data support, or offer consultation on evidence-based prevention strategies. Effective coalitions typically include representation from schools, law enforcement, healthcare, faith communities, business, government, and residents.
Environmental prevention strategies focus on modifying community conditions that influence substance use behaviors, including reducing availability through policy interventions, limiting advertising and marketing exposure, and creating community norms that discourage substance use. These approaches recognize that individual decisions about substance use are strongly influenced by environmental factors and that policy-level interventions can create population-level impacts.
School-based prevention programming remains an important component of comprehensive community approaches, with evidence-based curricula that teach resistance skills, promote positive social norms, and provide accurate information about substance use risks. Applied community psychology perspectives emphasize the importance of coordinating school-based efforts with family and community interventions to maximize impact and sustainability.
Educational Enhancement and Youth Development
Applied community psychology has made significant contributions to educational improvement efforts through interventions that address school climate, family engagement, community partnerships, and youth development (Durlak et al., 2011). These approaches recognize that educational outcomes are influenced by factors both within and outside of schools and that sustainable improvement requires multi-system interventions.
Social-emotional learning (SEL) programs represent well-researched applications of community psychology principles in educational settings, focusing on building students’ abilities to understand and manage emotions, establish positive relationships, and make responsible decisions. Applied community psychologists have contributed to SEL program development, implementation support, and evaluation while emphasizing the importance of addressing school-wide climate and culture changes that support social-emotional development.
Family engagement initiatives recognize that family involvement in education significantly influences student outcomes and that effective engagement requires addressing barriers that prevent meaningful participation while building on family strengths and cultural assets. Applied community psychology approaches to family engagement emphasize collaborative partnerships, cultural responsiveness, and capacity building that empowers families to advocate for their children’s educational needs.
Community schools models integrate educational services with community development efforts, providing comprehensive supports that address multiple factors influencing educational success. These approaches might include after-school programming, adult education, health and social services, and community organizing activities that strengthen neighborhood conditions supporting child and family well-being.
Youth development programming provides positive alternatives to problem-focused interventions by creating opportunities for young people to develop skills, build relationships, and contribute to their communities. Applied community psychology approaches to youth development emphasize strength-based programming, youth leadership development, and community engagement opportunities that allow young people to make meaningful contributions while building capacity for future success.
Implementation Strategies and Methods
Community Assessment and Needs Analysis
Effective applied community psychology practice begins with comprehensive community assessment that identifies strengths, needs, resources, and priorities while engaging community members as partners in the assessment process (McKnight & Kretzmann, 1993). This approach moves beyond traditional needs assessments that focus primarily on deficits to include systematic identification of community assets and capacities that can be mobilized for positive change.
Participatory assessment methods involve community members as researchers and analysts rather than passive subjects, ensuring that assessment processes reflect community perspectives and priorities while building local capacity for ongoing data collection and analysis. These approaches might include resident-led surveys, focus groups facilitated by community members, asset mapping exercises conducted by neighborhood groups, or photovoice projects that document community conditions from resident perspectives.
Mixed methods approaches combine quantitative data collection through surveys and administrative records with qualitative methods such as interviews, focus groups, and ethnographic observation to provide comprehensive understanding of community conditions and dynamics. Applied community psychologists facilitate these processes while providing technical assistance with research design, data collection, and analysis methods.
Asset-based assessment strategies identify individual skills and talents, organizational resources, physical assets, cultural resources, and economic assets within communities that can support intervention development and implementation. This approach recognizes that every community possesses strengths and resources that can be leveraged for positive change while avoiding deficit-focused assessments that may inadvertently reinforce negative community perceptions.
Ongoing assessment and monitoring systems enable communities to track changes over time and adjust interventions based on emerging data and changing conditions. Applied community psychologists often assist communities in developing sustainable data collection and analysis capacity that supports continuous quality improvement and accountability.
Program Development and Adaptation
Program development in applied community psychology involves translating research evidence and theoretical knowledge into practical interventions that are responsive to specific community contexts, needs, and resources (Castro et al., 2010). This process requires balancing fidelity to evidence-based practices with adaptation to local conditions and cultural preferences.
Logic model development provides a systematic framework for articulating program theory, assumptions, activities, and expected outcomes while creating shared understanding among stakeholders about program goals and strategies. Applied community psychologists facilitate logic model development processes that engage community partners in identifying desired outcomes, mapping pathways to change, and specifying activities and resources needed for implementation.
Cultural adaptation processes involve modifying evidence-based interventions to align with community cultural values, communication styles, and intervention preferences while maintaining core components that contribute to effectiveness. This might involve incorporating cultural practices and beliefs, modifying intervention formats and settings, training culturally representative staff, or developing hybrid approaches that integrate multiple intervention traditions.
Pilot testing and iterative refinement allow programs to be tested and improved before full-scale implementation, reducing the risk of implementation failure while building local capacity and support for interventions. Applied community psychologists often coordinate pilot testing processes that include formative evaluation, stakeholder feedback, and systematic refinement of program components.
Sustainability planning begins during program development and involves identifying resources, partnerships, and organizational changes needed to maintain interventions over time. This includes developing funding strategies, building institutional support, training local staff, and creating systems for ongoing program monitoring and improvement.
Implementation Support and Technical Assistance
Successful implementation of applied community psychology interventions requires ongoing support and technical assistance that addresses the complex challenges of translating program designs into effective practice (Fixsen et al., 2005). Implementation support involves multiple components including training, consultation, coaching, and organizational development assistance.
Training and capacity building activities prepare individuals and organizations to implement interventions effectively while building local expertise that supports program sustainability. This might include initial training workshops, ongoing skill development sessions, train-the-trainer programs that build local training capacity, or mentoring relationships that provide ongoing support and guidance.
Implementation coaching provides ongoing, individualized support that helps practitioners develop and refine their intervention skills while addressing specific challenges that arise during implementation. Applied community psychologists often serve as implementation coaches, providing regular consultation, observation and feedback, and problem-solving support that enhances intervention quality and effectiveness.
Organizational consultation addresses systemic factors that influence implementation success, including organizational culture, policies, procedures, and resource allocation patterns. This might involve strategic planning assistance, staff development, quality improvement initiatives, or policy development that creates supportive contexts for evidence-based practice.
Fidelity monitoring systems track the extent to which interventions are implemented as intended while identifying areas where additional support or adaptation may be needed. Applied community psychologists often develop and implement fidelity monitoring systems that balance accountability requirements with responsive adaptation to local conditions.
Evaluation and Outcome Assessment
Participatory Evaluation Approaches
Participatory evaluation represents a core methodology in applied community psychology that engages stakeholders as partners in designing and conducting evaluations rather than passive recipients of evaluation findings (Fetterman, 2001). This approach ensures that evaluations address questions of genuine importance to community members while building local capacity for ongoing assessment and improvement.
Stakeholder engagement processes involve identifying all individuals and groups who have interests in program outcomes and creating structures for meaningful participation in evaluation planning, implementation, and interpretation. This might include community residents, program participants, staff members, funders, policymakers, and other community organizations. Applied community psychologists facilitate stakeholder engagement while ensuring that traditionally marginalized voices are included and heard.
Collaborative evaluation design involves stakeholders in identifying evaluation questions, selecting appropriate methods, determining data collection strategies, and planning for dissemination and utilization of findings. This process recognizes that different stakeholders may have different perspectives on program success and that effective evaluation must address multiple accountability needs and interests.
Capacity building components of participatory evaluation help community members develop skills in data collection, analysis, and interpretation that support ongoing quality improvement and advocacy efforts. This might include training in survey development, focus group facilitation, data analysis techniques, or report writing that enables communities to conduct their own evaluations and use findings for program improvement and advocacy.
Utilization-focused approaches ensure that evaluation findings are used for program improvement, policy advocacy, and organizational development rather than simply satisfying accountability requirements. Applied community psychologists work with stakeholders to identify specific intended uses for evaluation findings and design evaluation processes that generate actionable information for decision-making.
Outcome Measurement and Indicators
Outcome measurement in applied community psychology involves identifying appropriate indicators of change at multiple levels while using culturally responsive measurement approaches that reflect community values and priorities (Trickett, 2009). This requires attention to both individual-level outcomes and community-level changes that may be difficult to measure using traditional evaluation methods.
Individual-level outcomes might include changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills, behaviors, or well-being among program participants. These outcomes are typically measured through surveys, interviews, observations, or administrative data while ensuring that measurement approaches are culturally appropriate and accessible to diverse participants.
Organizational-level outcomes focus on changes in organizational capacity, culture, policies, or practices that support program goals and sustainability. These might include improvements in staff skills and confidence, policy changes that support evidence-based practice, or increased collaboration and coordination among organizations serving common populations.
Community-level outcomes examine broader changes in community conditions, norms, resources, or capacity that result from intervention efforts. These are often the most challenging to measure but may include indicators such as increased civic participation, improved social cohesion, policy changes, or reduced community-wide problem rates.
Long-term impact assessment involves tracking changes over extended time periods to determine whether interventions produce lasting benefits and whether positive changes are sustained after formal program activities end. This type of evaluation is essential for demonstrating the value of prevention-oriented interventions that may not produce immediate observable changes.
Mixed methods approaches combine quantitative and qualitative data collection to provide comprehensive understanding of program processes and outcomes while accommodating different stakeholder information needs and preferences. Applied community psychologists often coordinate mixed methods evaluations that integrate statistical analysis with narrative approaches that capture community experiences and perspectives.
Contemporary Challenges and Innovations
Technology Integration
The integration of digital technologies into applied community psychology practice has created new opportunities for service delivery, community engagement, and data collection while also raising important questions about equity, privacy, and sustainability (Suarez-Balcazar et al., 2018). Technology-enhanced interventions can expand reach, reduce costs, and provide innovative approaches to behavior change and community mobilization.
Digital intervention platforms enable delivery of evidence-based programs through websites, mobile applications, and social media platforms that can reach large numbers of people while providing personalized content and interactive features. These approaches are particularly valuable for reaching populations that may face barriers to accessing traditional services, such as rural residents, individuals with mobility limitations, or people with demanding work schedules.
Online community building and organizing tools facilitate communication, coordination, and collaboration among community members and organizations while enabling new forms of civic participation and advocacy. Social media platforms, online forums, and digital organizing tools can amplify community voices, facilitate resource sharing, and enable rapid response to emerging issues and opportunities.
Data collection and analysis technologies provide new opportunities for community assessment, program monitoring, and evaluation through approaches such as online surveys, mobile data collection, geographic information systems (GIS), and social media analytics. These tools can reduce costs and increase efficiency while providing real-time data for program improvement and advocacy.
However, digital divides related to access, affordability, and digital literacy can limit the benefits of technology-based interventions and may exacerbate existing inequalities if not addressed thoughtfully. Applied community psychology approaches to technology integration must include attention to equity concerns through efforts to improve digital access, provide technology training, and ensure that digital interventions complement rather than replace face-to-face services and organizing efforts.
Trauma-Informed Practice
Trauma-informed approaches have become increasingly important in applied community psychology as understanding of trauma prevalence and impact has expanded to include historical trauma, community trauma, and intergenerational trauma that affect entire populations and communities (SAMHSA, 2014). These approaches involve fundamental shifts in organizational culture, policies, and practices that recognize the widespread impact of trauma while promoting healing and resilience.
Universal precautions approaches assume that trauma exposure is common and that all individuals and communities may have experienced trauma that affects their current functioning and relationships. This perspective involves modifying service delivery approaches to be trauma-sensitive while avoiding re-traumitization through policies, procedures, or interventions that inadvertently trigger trauma responses.
Organizational trauma-informed practice involves comprehensive changes in organizational culture, policies, staff training, and service delivery approaches that create safety, trustworthiness, collaboration, and empowerment for both service recipients and staff members. Applied community psychologists often provide consultation and training to help organizations implement trauma-informed approaches across all levels of operation.
Community trauma and healing approaches recognize that entire communities may experience collective trauma from events such as natural disasters, violence, economic devastation, or historical oppression, requiring community-level healing and resilience-building interventions. These approaches might involve community healing circles, collective meaning-making processes, cultural revitalization efforts, or policy advocacy that addresses structural factors contributing to community trauma.
Historical and intergenerational trauma frameworks provide understanding of how trauma experiences are transmitted across generations and how historical experiences of oppression continue to affect contemporary community functioning and well-being. Applied community psychology interventions may address historical trauma through culturally specific healing practices, community education about trauma impacts, and advocacy for policies that address ongoing structural inequities.
Sustainability and Systems Change
Sustainability has emerged as a critical concern in applied community psychology as programs and initiatives often struggle to maintain effectiveness and funding over time (Scheirer & Dearing, 2011). Sustainability planning involves identifying and addressing multiple factors that influence long-term program viability including financial resources, organizational capacity, community support, and policy environments.
Financial sustainability strategies involve diversifying funding sources, building earned revenue capacity, demonstrating cost-effectiveness, and advocating for sustained public investment in prevention and community development activities. Applied community psychologists may assist communities and organizations in developing business plans, grant-writing capacity, and advocacy strategies that support long-term financial viability.
Organizational sustainability involves building internal capacity for ongoing program implementation, adaptation, and improvement while creating organizational cultures that support evidence-based practice and continuous learning. This might involve staff development, policy changes, quality improvement systems, and leadership development that enables organizations to maintain effectiveness over time.
Community ownership and support represent essential components of sustainability, requiring genuine community engagement in program planning, implementation, and evaluation while ensuring that interventions address community-identified priorities and build on existing community strengths and resources.
Policy and systems change approaches focus on modifying broader institutional and policy environments that support or constrain community psychology interventions, recognizing that individual programs may have limited impact without supportive policy contexts. Applied community psychologists may engage in policy advocacy, legislative testimony, regulatory comment processes, or coalition building that creates more supportive environments for prevention and community development activities.
Conclusion
Applied Community Psychology has evolved into a mature and sophisticated field that effectively translates research and theory into practical interventions addressing complex social challenges. The field’s emphasis on prevention, empowerment, cultural responsiveness, and ecological thinking provides essential frameworks for developing sustainable, effective approaches to community change that honor community wisdom while maintaining scientific rigor.
The contemporary practice of applied community psychology is characterized by increasing sophistication in intervention development, implementation support, and evaluation methods while maintaining core commitments to participatory approaches and social justice. Integration of emerging technologies, trauma-informed practices, and sustainability frameworks has enhanced the field’s capacity to create lasting positive change while addressing persistent challenges related to equity, access, and long-term impact.
Future success in applied community psychology will require continued innovation in intervention approaches while maintaining fidelity to core principles and values that distinguish the field from other approaches to social change. This includes ongoing commitment to collaborative partnerships with communities, cultural responsiveness, and attention to power dynamics and structural inequities that influence intervention effectiveness and sustainability.
The field’s future contributions will depend on its ability to demonstrate effectiveness through rigorous evaluation while remaining responsive to changing community needs and social conditions. Applied community psychology must also continue to address diversity and inclusion within its own ranks while ensuring that interventions serve all communities effectively and responsively. As communities worldwide face unprecedented challenges requiring collaborative, multi-level approaches, applied community psychology provides essential knowledge, skills, and values for creating more just, equitable, and sustainable communities that promote the well-being of all residents.
References
- Castro, F. G., Barrera Jr, M., & Martinez Jr, C. R. (2004). The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: Resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prevention Science, 5(1), 41-45. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000013980.12412.cd
- Cowen, E. L. (2000). Now that we all know that primary prevention in mental health is great, what is it? Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(200001)28:1<5::AID-JCOP2>3.0.CO;2-Q
- David-Ferdon, C., & Simon, T. R. (2014). Preventing youth violence: Opportunities for action. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/opportunities-for-action.pdf
- Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
- Fetterman, D. M. (2001). Foundations of empowerment evaluation. Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/foundations-of-empowerment-evaluation/book9758
- Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. University of South Florida. https://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/sites/nirn.fpg.unc.edu/files/resources/NIRN-MonographFull-01-2005.pdf
- Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Arthur, M. W. (2002). Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behaviors, 27(6), 951-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00298-8
- Keyes, C. L. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62(2), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.95
- Kloos, B., Hill, J., Thomas, E., Wandersman, A., Elias, M. J., & Dalton, J. H. (2020). Community psychology: Linking individuals and communities (4th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://www.cengage.com/c/community-psychology-linking-individuals-and-communities-4e-kloos
- McKnight, J., & Kretzmann, J. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. ACTA Publications. https://www.abcdinstitute.org/publications/basicmanual/
- SAMHSA. (2014). Trauma-informed care in behavioral services: Treatment improvement protocol (TIP) Series 57. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://store.samhsa.gov/product/TIP-57-Trauma-Informed-Care-in-Behavioral-Services-Treatment-Improvement-Protocol-TIP-Series-57/SMA14-4816
- Scheirer, M. A., & Dearing, J. W. (2011). An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. American Journal of Public Health, 101(11), 2059-2067. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300193
- Shinn, M., & Yoshikawa, H. (Eds.). (2008). Toward positive youth development: Transforming schools and community programs. Oxford University Press. https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327892.001.0001/acprof-9780195327892
- Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Friesema, J., & Lukyanova, V. I. (2018). A participatory action research approach to evaluating a community health worker training program. Health Promotion Practice, 19(2), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839917726045
- Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2019). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Counseling+the+Culturally+Diverse%3A+Theory+and+Practice%2C+8th+Edition-p-9781119448044
- Trickett, E. J. (2009). Multilevel community-based culturally situated interventions and community impact: An ecological perspective. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43(3-4), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-009-9227-y
- Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43-63). Kluwer Academic. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2