The history of cross-cultural psychology represents a fascinating evolution from early ethnographic observations to a sophisticated scientific discipline that systematically examines how culture influences human behavior, cognition, and psychological processes. Cross-cultural psychology emerged as a distinct field in the mid-20th century, building upon earlier work in anthropology, sociology, and experimental psychology to develop rigorous methods for studying psychological phenomena across different cultural contexts. The discipline has been shaped by pioneering figures such as Gustav Jahoda, John Berry, Harry Triandis, and Geert Hofstede, who established theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches that continue to influence contemporary research. The field’s development can be traced through several key phases: early ethnographic and descriptive studies, the establishment of systematic research methodologies, the development of major theoretical frameworks including individualism-collectivism and cultural dimensions theory, and contemporary advances in indigenous psychologies and cultural neuroscience. Cross-cultural psychology has addressed fundamental questions about the universality versus cultural specificity of psychological processes, contributing to understanding of topics ranging from cognitive development and social behavior to personality and mental health across cultures. The discipline has evolved from primarily Western-centric comparisons to embrace indigenous perspectives, emic approaches, and more sophisticated understanding of culture as a dynamic, complex system that shapes human experience in profound ways.
Introduction
The systematic study of how culture influences human psychological processes represents one of the most intellectually challenging and practically important endeavors in the behavioral sciences. Cross-cultural psychology emerged as a distinct discipline from the recognition that much of psychological research had been conducted within narrow cultural contexts, primarily Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) populations, raising questions about the universality of psychological principles and processes.
The development of cross-cultural psychology as a scientific discipline reflects broader changes in global awareness, increased cultural contact through migration and communication technologies, and growing recognition of the limitations of culture-bound psychological theories. This field emerged from the intersection of psychology, anthropology, and sociology, creating a unique interdisciplinary approach to understanding human behavior.
Early cross-cultural psychology was motivated by fundamental questions about human nature: Are psychological processes universal across cultures, or do they vary systematically based on cultural contexts? How do cultural values, practices, and worldviews shape individual psychology? What can we learn about human psychological functioning by studying diverse cultural groups?
The historical development of cross-cultural psychology has been marked by significant methodological advances, theoretical innovations, and shifts in perspective that reflect the field’s maturation and increasing sophistication. From early descriptive comparisons to contemporary experimental studies and indigenous psychology approaches, the field has evolved to embrace both etic (universal) and emic (culture-specific) perspectives on psychological phenomena.
Understanding the history of cross-cultural psychology is essential for contemporary researchers and practitioners because it reveals how the field’s current theoretical frameworks, methodological approaches, and research priorities developed over time. This historical perspective also illuminates ongoing challenges and opportunities facing the discipline as it continues to evolve in an increasingly interconnected yet culturally diverse world.
Early Foundations and Precursors
Anthropological and Ethnographic Origins
The intellectual roots of cross-cultural psychology can be traced to early anthropological and ethnographic work that documented cultural variations in human behavior, thought patterns, and social organization. These early observations provided descriptive foundations for later systematic psychological research across cultures.
Franz Boas, often considered the father of American anthropology, made significant contributions to understanding cultural relativism and the importance of studying cultures within their own contexts rather than from external perspectives. His emphasis on cultural particularism and rejection of evolutionary hierarchies among cultures provided important conceptual foundations for cross-cultural psychology’s development.
Margaret Mead’s influential ethnographic studies, including her work on adolescence in Samoa and gender roles in New Guinea, challenged Western assumptions about universal developmental processes and demonstrated the profound influence of culture on personality development and social behavior. Her work helped establish the importance of studying psychological phenomena across diverse cultural contexts.
Ruth Benedict’s research on cultural patterns and personality contributed to understanding how cultural configurations shape individual psychological characteristics. Her comparative studies of different cultural groups demonstrated systematic relationships between cultural values and individual behavior patterns, providing early evidence for culture-psychology relationships.
The culture and personality school in anthropology, which flourished from the 1920s through the 1950s, explicitly focused on relationships between cultural patterns and individual psychological characteristics. This work established important theoretical foundations for understanding how culture shapes personality development and psychological functioning.
Early Psychological Investigations
Early psychologists began conducting comparative studies across different cultural groups, initially motivated by questions about the universality of psychological processes and the influence of cultural factors on mental functioning.
Wilhelm Wundt, one of the founders of experimental psychology, recognized the importance of cultural factors in psychological processes and wrote extensively about Völkerpsychologie (folk psychology), emphasizing the need to study psychological phenomena within cultural contexts. His work helped establish the conceptual framework for cultural influences on psychology.
G. Stanley Hall and his students conducted some of the first systematic cross-cultural psychological studies, examining developmental processes, cognitive abilities, and educational practices across different cultural groups. These early studies established methodological precedents for comparative psychological research.
Early intelligence testing across different cultural groups, while often problematic in its assumptions and interpretations, raised important questions about cultural bias in psychological assessment and the cultural specificity of cognitive abilities. These studies highlighted the need for culturally appropriate assessment methods and theoretical frameworks.
Rivers’ Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to the Torres Straits in 1898 included systematic psychological studies of perception, cognition, and sensory processes among indigenous populations, representing one of the first attempts to apply experimental psychological methods in cross-cultural contexts.
Colonial and Missionary Influences
The colonial period contributed significantly to early cross-cultural psychological observations, though often through the problematic lens of cultural superiority and evolutionary assumptions that would later be challenged and rejected by the field.
Missionary reports and colonial administrative documents provided extensive, though often biased, descriptions of psychological and behavioral patterns among non-Western populations. While these sources contained valuable observational data, they were typically interpreted through ethnocentric frameworks that assumed Western psychological patterns as normative.
Colonial educational and administrative systems created contexts for observing cultural differences in learning, social organization, and psychological functioning. These observations, while often interpreted problematically, provided descriptive data that later researchers would reinterpret from more sophisticated theoretical perspectives.
The colonial encounter between Western and non-Western cultures created conditions for observing cultural contact effects, acculturation processes, and psychological adaptation to cultural change. These observations would later become important areas of systematic research in cross-cultural psychology.
Establishment of the Discipline (1960s-1970s)
Founding Figures and Institutional Development
The formal establishment of cross-cultural psychology as a scientific discipline occurred during the 1960s and 1970s through the work of pioneering researchers who developed systematic methodological approaches and theoretical frameworks for studying culture and psychology relationships.
Gustav Jahoda, often considered one of the founding figures of cross-cultural psychology, made significant theoretical contributions to understanding the relationship between culture and cognition. His work on cognitive development across cultures challenged Piagetian assumptions about universal developmental stages and demonstrated the importance of cultural context in cognitive development.
John Berry developed influential theoretical frameworks for understanding acculturation and cultural adaptation, contributing to systematic understanding of how individuals and groups adapt psychologically to cultural change and contact. His work established acculturation as a major research area within cross-cultural psychology.
Harry Triandis made foundational contributions to understanding cultural differences in social behavior, particularly in the areas of attitudes, values, and interpersonal relationships. His systematic approach to studying cultural variations in social psychology established important methodological and theoretical foundations for the field.
The International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology (IACCP) was founded in 1972, providing institutional structure and professional identity for researchers working in this emerging field. The association’s establishment marked the formal recognition of cross-cultural psychology as a distinct scientific discipline.
Methodological Innovations
The establishment period was marked by significant methodological innovations that addressed challenges specific to cross-cultural research, including issues of equivalence, translation, sampling, and cultural bias in measurement.
The development of systematic approaches to ensuring conceptual, functional, and metric equivalence across cultures became central to cross-cultural methodology. These approaches addressed the fundamental challenge of comparing psychological phenomena across cultures while ensuring meaningful and valid comparisons.
Translation and back-translation procedures were developed to ensure linguistic equivalence of psychological instruments across different language groups. These methodological innovations addressed the challenge of maintaining meaning consistency while adapting instruments for different cultural and linguistic contexts.
Sampling strategies specific to cross-cultural research were developed to ensure appropriate representation of cultural groups while addressing practical challenges related to accessibility, cultural appropriateness, and resource limitations inherent in cross-cultural studies.
The development of culture-fair and culture-free testing approaches attempted to create assessment instruments that could provide valid measures across different cultural groups. While these approaches faced significant conceptual and practical challenges, they contributed to important methodological discussions about cultural bias in psychological measurement.
Early Theoretical Frameworks
The establishment period saw the development of several influential theoretical frameworks that provided conceptual foundations for understanding culture-psychology relationships and guided empirical research programs.
The eco-cultural framework, developed by John Berry, proposed systematic relationships between ecological contexts, cultural adaptations, and individual psychological characteristics. This framework provided a comprehensive model for understanding how environmental and cultural factors influence psychological development and functioning.
Cognitive anthropology approaches, influenced by scholars such as Roy D’Andrade and Naomi Quinn, focused on cultural models and schemas that shape thought processes and behavior. These approaches contributed to understanding how cultural knowledge systems influence individual cognition and behavior.
Early cross-cultural developmental psychology, influenced by researchers such as Patricia Miller and David Stevenson, examined cultural variations in child development, parenting practices, and educational processes. This work challenged universal stage theories and demonstrated the importance of cultural context in development.
Social learning theory applications to cross-cultural contexts examined how cultural practices, values, and socialization processes shape individual learning and behavior. This work provided frameworks for understanding cultural transmission and individual cultural adaptation.
Major Theoretical Developments
Individualism-Collectivism Framework
The individualism-collectivism framework, developed primarily through the work of Harry Triandis and Geert Hofstede, became one of the most influential theoretical constructs in cross-cultural psychology, providing a systematic way to understand cultural differences in social behavior and values.
Triandis’s extensive research on individualism and collectivism examined how these cultural orientations influence various psychological processes, including self-concept, social behavior, attitudes, and values. His work demonstrated systematic relationships between cultural orientation and individual psychological characteristics.
The development of measurement instruments for assessing individualistic and collectivistic orientations enabled systematic empirical research on this cultural dimension. These instruments allowed researchers to examine relationships between cultural orientation and various psychological outcomes.
Research on individualism-collectivism revealed important differences in self-concept, with individualistic cultures emphasizing independent self-construals and collectivistic cultures emphasizing interdependent self-construals. This work contributed to fundamental understanding of cultural variations in identity and self-perception.
The framework’s application to understanding cultural differences in social behavior, motivation, and cognition generated extensive research programs that examined how cultural orientation influences various psychological processes and outcomes.
Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory
Geert Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory, originally developed through his analysis of IBM employee surveys across multiple countries, provided a comprehensive framework for understanding cultural differences along several key dimensions.
The original four cultural dimensions – power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism-collectivism, and masculinity-femininity – provided systematic ways to characterize cultures and predict cultural differences in behavior, values, and social organization.
Later additions of long-term orientation and indulgence-restraint dimensions expanded the framework’s comprehensiveness and applicability to understanding cultural variations in temporal orientation and normative control.
Hofstede’s work influenced numerous research programs examining relationships between cultural dimensions and various psychological, organizational, and social outcomes. The framework’s quantitative approach enabled systematic comparative research across large numbers of countries and cultures.
The cultural dimensions theory became widely applied in organizational psychology, international business, and intercultural communication, demonstrating the practical utility of cross-cultural psychological frameworks for understanding real-world phenomena.
Indigenous Psychology Movements
The development of indigenous psychology approaches represented a significant theoretical advancement that challenged Western-centric assumptions and promoted culture-specific understanding of psychological phenomena.
Indigenous psychology movements emerged in various regions, including Asia, Africa, and Latin America, with scholars arguing for the development of psychological theories and methods that were appropriate to their specific cultural contexts rather than simply applying Western psychological frameworks.
Enrique Bantug in the Philippines, Durganand Sinha in India, and other indigenous psychology pioneers developed culturally grounded approaches to understanding psychological phenomena that drew on local knowledge systems, values, and worldviews.
The indigenous psychology movement contributed important critiques of mainstream cross-cultural psychology, arguing that truly understanding psychology across cultures required moving beyond imposed-etic approaches to embrace emic perspectives and indigenous knowledge systems.
These movements led to the development of culture-specific psychological theories, assessment instruments, and intervention approaches that were better suited to local cultural contexts and needs.
Contemporary Developments (1980s-Present)
Methodological Sophistication
Contemporary cross-cultural psychology has been characterized by increasingly sophisticated methodological approaches that address earlier limitations and enable more rigorous and nuanced research on culture-psychology relationships.
Multi-level modeling approaches have enabled researchers to examine cultural effects at multiple levels of analysis simultaneously, from individual to cultural group levels. These approaches provide more sophisticated understanding of how cultural factors influence individual psychological processes.
The development of cultural priming methodologies has enabled experimental research on cultural influences by temporarily activating different cultural mindsets within individuals. These methods have contributed to understanding the dynamic and situational aspects of cultural influences on psychology.
Longitudinal and developmental approaches to cross-cultural research have provided insights into how cultural influences operate across time and how individuals develop culturally appropriate psychological patterns throughout their lives.
Mixed-methods approaches combining quantitative and qualitative methods have provided richer and more comprehensive understanding of culture-psychology relationships by capturing both measurable differences and the cultural meaning systems that underlie them.
Cultural Neuroscience
The emergence of cultural neuroscience as a research area represents one of the most significant contemporary developments in cross-cultural psychology, examining how culture influences brain structure and functioning.
Neuroimaging studies have revealed cultural differences in brain activation patterns during various cognitive and social tasks, providing biological evidence for cultural influences on psychological processes. These studies have examined cultural differences in attention, memory, social cognition, and emotional processing.
Research on cultural differences in brain structure, including findings related to gray matter density and neural connectivity patterns, has provided insights into how cultural experiences may shape brain development and organization.
Studies of cultural differences in neural plasticity and adaptation have contributed to understanding how brains adapt to different cultural environments and learning demands throughout development and across the lifespan.
The integration of neuroscience methods with traditional cross-cultural approaches has provided new levels of evidence for cultural influences on psychology while also raising important questions about the interpretation of cultural differences in brain functioning.
Digital Age and Globalization Effects
Contemporary cross-cultural psychology has had to address the effects of globalization, digital communication, and increased cultural contact on traditional cultural patterns and culture-psychology relationships.
Research on digital culture and online behavior has examined how internet use and social media participation influence cultural values, social behavior, and identity processes. These studies have revealed both cultural convergence and divergence effects of digital technology.
Studies of cultural change and modernization have examined how traditional cultural patterns are being modified by globalization processes and what psychological implications these changes have for individuals and communities.
Research on multicultural identities and cultural blending has examined how individuals navigate multiple cultural identities in increasingly diverse and interconnected societies. This work has contributed to understanding cultural complexity and individual cultural adaptation.
The study of cultural transmission in digital environments has examined how cultural knowledge, values, and practices are maintained and modified through digital communication and online communities.
Contemporary Theoretical Integration
Recent theoretical developments have focused on integrating insights from multiple theoretical frameworks and addressing limitations of earlier approaches to create more comprehensive understanding of culture-psychology relationships.
Dynamic constructivist approaches emphasize the mutual constitution of culture and psychology, arguing that culture and individual psychology continuously influence each other in ongoing processes of cultural and psychological development.
Cultural evolutionary approaches examine how cultural and psychological traits co-evolve over time, contributing to understanding of how cultural and biological factors interact to shape human psychological characteristics.
Ecocultural psychology approaches have integrated insights from ecological psychology, cultural psychology, and evolutionary psychology to create comprehensive frameworks for understanding human psychological adaptation to cultural and environmental contexts.
The development of multilevel and complex systems approaches has provided frameworks for understanding culture-psychology relationships as emergent properties of complex interactions among biological, psychological, social, and cultural factors.
Major Research Areas and Findings
Cognitive Development and Cultural Learning
Cross-cultural research on cognitive development has revealed important cultural variations in thinking processes, learning strategies, and intellectual development while also identifying universal aspects of cognitive functioning.
Studies of mathematical and scientific reasoning across cultures have revealed cultural differences in problem-solving strategies, numerical cognition, and spatial thinking. These differences have been linked to cultural practices, educational systems, and cultural values related to learning and achievement.
Research on language and thought relationships across cultures has examined how linguistic differences influence cognitive processes, contributing to understanding of linguistic relativity and cultural influences on categorization, memory, and reasoning.
Cross-cultural studies of memory processes have revealed cultural differences in memory strategies, autobiographical memory, and the relationship between individual and collective memory. These studies have demonstrated how cultural practices and values influence memory functioning.
Research on cultural differences in attention and perception has revealed systematic variations in attentional focus, perceptual processing, and environmental perception that relate to cultural values and practices.
Social Behavior and Interpersonal Relationships
Cross-cultural research on social behavior has revealed extensive cultural variations in interpersonal relationships, social norms, and group processes while also identifying universal aspects of human social behavior.
Studies of cultural differences in social cognition have examined how cultural factors influence person perception, attribution processes, and understanding of social relationships. This research has revealed systematic cultural differences in social inference and judgment.
Research on cultural variations in cooperation, competition, and prosocial behavior has demonstrated how cultural values and social systems influence individual social behavior and group dynamics.
Cross-cultural studies of emotion expression and recognition have revealed both universal and culture-specific aspects of emotional functioning, contributing to understanding of how culture shapes emotional experience and expression.
Research on cultural differences in communication styles, including high-context versus low-context communication, has contributed to understanding of how cultural factors influence interpersonal communication and relationship development.
Personality and Individual Differences
Cross-cultural personality research has examined the universality and cultural specificity of personality dimensions, contributing to understanding of how culture influences individual differences and personality development.
The cross-cultural validation of the Big Five personality model has revealed both universal factors and cultural variations in personality structure, expression, and development. This research has contributed to understanding of which personality characteristics are universal versus culturally specific.
Studies of cultural differences in self-concept and identity have revealed systematic variations in self-construal, self-esteem, and identity development across cultures. This research has demonstrated how cultural values and practices shape individual identity formation.
Research on cultural differences in values and attitudes has examined how cultural factors influence individual priorities, preferences, and evaluative judgments. This work has contributed to understanding of cultural transmission and individual cultural adaptation.
Cross-cultural studies of coping and adaptation have examined how cultural factors influence responses to stress, adversity, and life challenges, revealing cultural differences in coping strategies and resilience processes.
Challenges and Future Directions
Methodological and Conceptual Challenges
Contemporary cross-cultural psychology faces several significant methodological and conceptual challenges that require ongoing attention and development of innovative solutions.
The problem of cultural equivalence continues to challenge cross-cultural researchers, as ensuring that psychological constructs have equivalent meaning across cultures remains difficult and requires sophisticated methodological approaches.
Sampling and generalizability issues persist, as much cross-cultural research continues to rely on convenience samples that may not be representative of the cultures being studied, limiting the generalizability of findings.
The challenge of separating cultural influences from other factors such as socioeconomic status, education, and historical context requires sophisticated research designs and analytical approaches that can isolate cultural effects.
The dynamic nature of culture creates challenges for cross-cultural research, as cultures are continuously changing and evolving, making it difficult to characterize stable cultural patterns or predict cultural differences.
Ethical and Social Responsibility Issues
Cross-cultural psychology faces important ethical challenges related to cultural representation, researcher positionality, and the potential for research findings to reinforce stereotypes or cultural hierarchies.
Questions about who has the authority to study and represent different cultures remain important, with increasing recognition of the need for indigenous researchers and culturally grounded research approaches.
The potential for cross-cultural research findings to be misused to justify discrimination or cultural superiority requires careful attention to how research is conducted, interpreted, and communicated to various audiences.
Issues related to cultural appropriation in research and the exploitation of cultural knowledge for academic or commercial purposes require ongoing attention to ethical guidelines and community engagement.
The responsibility to give back to communities that participate in cross-cultural research through knowledge sharing, capacity building, and practical applications remains an important ethical consideration.
Future Research Directions
Several promising research directions offer opportunities for advancing cross-cultural psychology while addressing current limitations and emerging challenges.
Integration with other disciplines, including neuroscience, genetics, economics, and computer science, offers opportunities for more comprehensive understanding of culture-psychology relationships through interdisciplinary collaboration.
The development of more sophisticated theoretical models that can account for cultural change, cultural complexity, and individual variation within cultures represents an important direction for theoretical advancement.
Research on digital cultures and virtual environments offers opportunities to study cultural processes in new contexts while also examining how traditional cultural patterns are being modified by technological change.
Investigation of cultural factors in mental health and wellbeing across cultures represents an important area for both theoretical development and practical application of cross-cultural psychological knowledge.
The development of culturally adapted interventions and applications of cross-cultural psychological knowledge to address real-world problems offers opportunities to demonstrate the practical utility of cross-cultural research.
Conclusion
The history of cross-cultural psychology reveals a fascinating evolution from early ethnographic observations to a sophisticated scientific discipline that systematically examines how culture influences human psychological processes. This development reflects the field’s increasing methodological sophistication, theoretical integration, and recognition of the complexity of culture-psychology relationships.
The pioneering work of early cross-cultural psychologists, including Gustav Jahoda, John Berry, Harry Triandis, and Geert Hofstede, established foundational theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches that continue to influence contemporary research. Their contributions demonstrated that psychological processes are not universal but vary systematically across cultures in ways that reveal important insights about human nature.
The field’s theoretical developments, including the individualism-collectivism framework, cultural dimensions theory, and indigenous psychology movements, have provided sophisticated frameworks for understanding cultural differences while also revealing the limitations of Western-centric psychological theories. These developments have contributed to more inclusive and culturally sensitive approaches to psychological research and practice.
Contemporary developments in cross-cultural psychology, including cultural neuroscience, digital age research, and theoretical integration, demonstrate the field’s continued evolution and adaptation to changing global conditions. These developments offer promising directions for future research while also highlighting ongoing challenges and opportunities.
The methodological sophistication that characterizes contemporary cross-cultural psychology has enabled more rigorous and nuanced research on culture-psychology relationships while also revealing the complexity of these relationships and the need for continued methodological innovation.
Major research findings in areas such as cognitive development, social behavior, and personality have revealed both universal and culture-specific aspects of human psychology, contributing to more complete understanding of human psychological functioning and the factors that influence it.
The challenges facing contemporary cross-cultural psychology, including methodological limitations, ethical considerations, and the need for theoretical advancement, provide important directions for future development and opportunities for continued contribution to understanding human psychology.
The future of cross-cultural psychology appears promising, with expanding opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration, methodological innovation, and practical application of cross-cultural psychological knowledge to address real-world challenges and improve human wellbeing across cultures.
Understanding the history of cross-cultural psychology provides essential context for contemporary research and practice while also revealing the ongoing importance of cultural factors in psychological research and the need for continued development of culturally informed approaches to understanding human behavior and experience.
References
- Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/crosscultural-psychology/E8B5B5B5B5B5B5B5B5B5B5B5B5B5B5
- Berry, J. W., & Sam, D. L. (1997). Acculturation and adaptation. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 3. Social behavior and applications (2nd ed., pp. 291-326). Allyn & Bacon. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/
- Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674179565
- Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/cultures-consequences/book9710
- Jahoda, G. (2012). Critical reflections on some recent definitions of “culture.” Culture & Psychology, 18(3), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X12446229
- Kim, U., Yang, K. S., & Hwang, K. K. (Eds.). (2006). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/0-387-28662-4
- Kitayama, S., & Cohen, D. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of cultural psychology. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Handbook-of-Cultural-Psychology/Kitayama-Cohen/9781593854668
- Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2017). Culture and psychology (6th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://www.cengage.com/c/culture-and-psychology-6e-matsumoto
- Segall, M. H., Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1999). Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/
- Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674884151
- Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. McGraw-Hill. https://www.mheducation.com/
- Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press. https://www.routledge.com/Individualism-and-Collectivism/Triandis/p/book/9780813309798