Stigma and Disclosure in Health Conditions

This article explores the intricate dynamics of stigma and disclosure within the realm of health conditions, anchoring its discourse in the principles of health psychology. The introduction sets the stage by defining stigma, emphasizing its pervasive influence in health settings, and outlining the article’s objectives. The first body section delves into a nuanced understanding of stigma, classifying its types and elucidating its profound impact on individuals facing health challenges. The second body section investigates the multifaceted factors contributing to stigma, spanning societal influences to individual coping mechanisms. The third body section intricately examines the repercussions of stigma on mental health, elucidating its psychological and behavioral consequences. Subsequent sections explore strategies for stigma reduction, the role of social support, cultural variations, and implications for health interventions. The article concludes by summarizing key findings, emphasizing the ongoing significance of stigma and disclosure in health psychology, and advocating for continued research and interventions in this critical area.

Introduction

Stigma, within the context of health conditions, encapsulates the social and psychological processes through which individuals are devalued, marked, or marginalized based on attributes related to their health status. It extends beyond the observable symptoms of a condition, encompassing societal attitudes and stereotypes that contribute to the discrimination and prejudice faced by those grappling with health challenges. Understanding the intricacies of stigma is crucial in deciphering its profound impact on individuals, both at the individual and societal levels.

In the realm of health psychology, the significance of stigma lies in its potent influence on the well-being of individuals experiencing health conditions. Stigma can manifest in various forms, including public misconceptions, discriminatory practices, and self-stigmatization, leading to adverse consequences for mental health, treatment adherence, and overall quality of life. The field of health psychology is uniquely positioned to unravel the complex interplay between societal perceptions, individual experiences, and health outcomes, providing insights that can inform interventions aimed at mitigating the deleterious effects of stigma.

This article serves the purpose of examining the intricate relationship between stigma and health conditions within the framework of health psychology. By delving into the multifaceted aspects of stigma, including its definitions, contributing factors, and repercussions, the aim is to provide a holistic understanding of this phenomenon. Furthermore, the article explores the critical concept of disclosure – the act of revealing one’s health status – as it intersects with stigma. The overarching goal is to illuminate the various dimensions of stigma within the context of health, fostering awareness, understanding, and offering insights that can guide both research endeavors and practical interventions.

At the core of this exploration is the thesis that the pervasive nature of stigma significantly impacts individuals facing health conditions, influencing their mental health, healthcare-seeking behaviors, and overall quality of life. By unraveling the layers of stigma within health psychology, this article seeks to contribute valuable insights that not only deepen scholarly understanding but also inform strategies and interventions aimed at reducing stigma and enhancing the well-being of those navigating the complexities of health challenges.

Understanding Stigma in Health Conditions

Stigma in the context of health conditions is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that extends beyond the immediate physical manifestations of illness. It involves the social construction of negative attitudes, beliefs, and stereotypes surrounding individuals with health challenges, creating a pervasive environment of discrimination. Conceptually, stigma encompasses both public and self-directed aspects, where societal perceptions and internalized negative beliefs contribute to the stigmatization of individuals based on their health status. Understanding the intricate layers of this phenomenon is essential for unraveling its impact on individuals and devising effective strategies for mitigation.

Stigma within health settings manifests in various forms, each with distinct implications for individuals grappling with health conditions. Public stigma refers to the negative attitudes and discriminatory behaviors that individuals may encounter from the broader society, leading to social isolation and hindered opportunities. Self-stigma involves the internalization of societal prejudices, causing individuals to perceive themselves through the lens of societal stereotypes, often resulting in diminished self-esteem and compromised mental health. Additionally, institutional stigma can arise within healthcare systems, influencing treatment quality, access, and the overall healthcare experience for those with health conditions.

The consequences of stigma on individuals facing health conditions are profound and far-reaching. Psychologically, stigma can contribute to heightened levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, exacerbating the challenges associated with managing a health condition. Behaviorally, individuals may be deterred from seeking timely and appropriate healthcare due to fear of judgment or discrimination. Socially, stigma can lead to isolation and strained interpersonal relationships, amplifying the emotional burden on individuals already navigating the complexities of their health challenges. Recognizing and addressing these impacts is essential for promoting holistic well-being among those affected.

Stereotypes and prejudice play a pivotal role in the stigmatization of individuals with health conditions. Preconceived notions and biased beliefs about specific health conditions contribute to the formation of stereotypes, perpetuating misinformation and fostering discriminatory attitudes. The portrayal of certain conditions in media and societal discourse further shapes public perceptions, influencing how individuals with health challenges are perceived and treated. Unraveling the intricate interplay between stereotypes, prejudice, and stigma is crucial for developing targeted interventions that challenge misconceptions and promote a more inclusive and empathetic society.

Factors Influencing Stigma

Cultural norms and values significantly contribute to the development and perpetuation of stigma surrounding health conditions. Different cultures may hold distinct beliefs about illness, attributing it to moral failings, supernatural causes, or contagious elements. These cultural perspectives shape societal attitudes, influencing how individuals with health conditions are perceived and treated. Understanding the cultural underpinnings of stigma is essential for tailoring interventions that are culturally sensitive and address the specific nuances of diverse belief systems.

Media plays a pivotal role in shaping public perceptions of health conditions, often contributing to the stigmatization of individuals with specific illnesses. Sensationalized portrayals, inaccurate information, and stigmatizing language in media coverage can reinforce negative stereotypes and contribute to public misconceptions. Addressing these issues involves promoting responsible and accurate reporting, as well as fostering media campaigns that challenge stigmatizing narratives and promote empathy and understanding.

Internalized stigma occurs when individuals with health conditions internalize societal prejudices and negative stereotypes, leading to a diminished sense of self-worth and identity. This process can have profound effects on mental health, exacerbating symptoms of anxiety and depression. Overcoming internalized stigma requires targeted interventions that empower individuals to challenge and reframe negative self-perceptions, fostering self-acceptance and resilience.

Individuals facing health conditions often develop coping mechanisms to navigate the challenges posed by stigma. These coping strategies can vary widely, ranging from concealment of health status to seeking social support. However, some coping mechanisms may inadvertently contribute to the perpetuation of stigma or negatively impact mental health. Exploring adaptive coping strategies and providing individuals with alternative tools to manage stigma is crucial for promoting well-being and resilience in the face of societal and internalized pressures.

Understanding the interplay between societal and individual factors influencing stigma is essential for developing comprehensive interventions that address the root causes of stigmatization. By addressing cultural influences, media representations, internalized stigma, and coping mechanisms, health psychologists can contribute to the creation of more inclusive and supportive environments for individuals grappling with health conditions.

Disclosure in Health Conditions

Disclosure, within the context of health conditions, refers to the act of revealing one’s health status to others. This encompasses the communication of information regarding the presence, nature, or impact of a health condition to individuals in one’s social network, healthcare providers, or the broader community. Disclosure is a dynamic process influenced by various factors, and its nuances have significant implications for the individual’s well-being and interpersonal relationships.

The importance of disclosure in health psychology lies in its role as a critical interpersonal and psychological phenomenon. Openly sharing information about one’s health condition can foster social support, empathy, and understanding, all of which are integral to the psychological well-being of individuals facing health challenges. Moreover, disclosure plays a crucial role in the healthcare context, influencing treatment decisions, adherence, and the quality of the patient-provider relationship. Studying the intricacies of disclosure contributes to a deeper understanding of how individuals navigate the complex terrain of sharing their health status.

The process of disclosure is accompanied by both challenges and benefits. On one hand, individuals may encounter fear of stigma, discrimination, or social rejection, creating a barrier to open communication about their health. The potential for negative consequences can lead to the reluctance to disclose, contributing to the concealment of health conditions. On the other hand, disclosure can also bring about numerous benefits, including emotional relief, social support, and the opportunity to educate others about specific health conditions. Understanding and mitigating the challenges while maximizing the benefits of disclosure is crucial for promoting the overall well-being of individuals navigating health conditions.

The decision to disclose one’s health condition is a complex process influenced by a myriad of factors. Individuals weigh considerations such as the perceived level of stigma associated with their condition, the anticipated support from others, and the potential impact on relationships and work. The decision-making process is also dynamic, with individuals continuously reassessing and adapting their disclosure strategies based on changing circumstances. Exploring the factors that influence the decision to disclose, as well as the timing and manner of disclosure, contributes to a nuanced understanding of the challenges individuals face in balancing their health information with social and professional contexts.

By delving into the intricacies of disclosure in health conditions, health psychologists can contribute valuable insights to inform interventions that facilitate open communication, reduce stigma, and enhance the overall quality of life for individuals facing health challenges. Understanding the decision-making process behind disclosure is pivotal for tailoring support mechanisms and fostering environments that encourage openness and understanding.

Impact of Stigma on Mental Health

Stigma associated with health conditions exerts a profound toll on the mental health of individuals, often manifesting in heightened levels of depression and anxiety. The experience of being stigmatized can contribute to persistent feelings of shame, worthlessness, and isolation. The fear of judgment and discrimination can intensify psychological distress, leading to a cascade of negative emotions that exacerbate existing mental health challenges. Understanding the intricate connections between stigma and these psychological consequences is crucial for developing targeted interventions that address the unique mental health needs of individuals facing health conditions.

Stigmatization can erode individuals’ self-esteem, impacting their overall sense of identity and self-worth. Negative societal attitudes and perceptions can internalize, leading to self-stigmatization. Individuals may develop a diminished self-concept, viewing themselves through the lens of societal stereotypes associated with their health condition. This erosion of self-esteem not only intensifies the psychological burden but also influences the individual’s ability to cope with and manage their health challenges effectively.

Stigma contributes to the avoidance of healthcare services, as individuals may fear judgment or discrimination from healthcare providers. This avoidance can have severe consequences, leading to delayed or inadequate medical care, exacerbation of health conditions, and compromised overall health outcomes. Understanding the impact of stigma on healthcare-seeking behavior is crucial for developing interventions that promote access to timely and appropriate medical care, thereby enhancing the overall health and well-being of individuals facing stigmatization.

Stigma often precipitates social isolation, as individuals may withdraw from social interactions to avoid potential stigmatizing experiences. The fear of being judged or rejected by others can lead to the gradual disintegration of social support networks. Social isolation, in turn, exacerbates feelings of loneliness and contributes to the negative cycle of mental health challenges. Recognizing the role of stigma in fostering social isolation is essential for designing interventions that promote inclusivity and counteract the detrimental effects of isolation on mental health.

Understanding the nuanced impact of stigma on mental health, encompassing both psychological and behavioral consequences, is imperative for health psychologists and practitioners. By addressing the intricate interplay between stigma and mental health, interventions can be tailored to mitigate the negative effects of stigma, foster resilience, and promote overall psychological well-being among individuals facing health conditions.

Strategies for Reducing Stigma

Public health campaigns play a pivotal role in challenging and altering societal attitudes towards health conditions. These campaigns aim to disseminate accurate information, debunk myths, and promote empathetic understanding. By utilizing various media channels, including television, radio, and social media platforms, public health campaigns have the potential to reach diverse audiences. The emphasis is on destigmatizing specific health conditions, fostering inclusivity, and encouraging open conversations. Effective public health campaigns not only provide education but also create a cultural shift, fostering an environment that rejects stigmatizing beliefs and practices.

Education and awareness programs are instrumental in reducing stigma by imparting accurate information about health conditions. These programs target diverse audiences, including the general public, healthcare professionals, and workplaces. By dispelling misconceptions and providing insight into the lived experiences of individuals with health conditions, education programs challenge stereotypes and foster empathy. In healthcare settings, training programs can enhance the cultural competence of providers, promoting patient-centered care and reducing stigmatizing behaviors. Workplace initiatives can create inclusive environments that support employees facing health challenges.

Advocacy efforts aimed at influencing policy changes are critical in addressing systemic and structural sources of stigma. Advocacy initiatives seek to eliminate discriminatory practices, promote equal access to healthcare, and challenge prejudicial policies. By collaborating with policymakers, advocacy groups can influence the development and implementation of laws and regulations that protect the rights of individuals with health conditions. These efforts extend beyond legal frameworks to encompass institutional policies within healthcare organizations, workplaces, and educational institutions, fostering environments that prioritize inclusivity and equality.

Empowering individuals facing health conditions to share their narratives and advocate for their rights is a powerful strategy in stigma reduction. Personal empowerment initiatives focus on building resilience, self-esteem, and self-advocacy skills. Support groups and peer mentoring programs provide platforms for individuals to connect, share experiences, and learn from one another. By fostering a sense of agency, personal empowerment strategies equip individuals to navigate societal challenges, challenge stigmatizing attitudes, and contribute to the broader movement for stigma reduction.

Implementing a multifaceted approach that combines public health campaigns, education and awareness programs, advocacy for policy changes, and personal empowerment initiatives is essential in creating a comprehensive strategy for reducing stigma. By addressing societal, institutional, and individual levels, these strategies work synergistically to foster a more inclusive and understanding environment for individuals facing health conditions.

Research Findings on Stigma and Health Outcomes

Numerous research studies have explored the intricate relationship between stigma and treatment adherence among individuals with health conditions. Stigmatization can significantly impede adherence to prescribed treatment regimens, exacerbating health issues and compromising overall well-being. Individuals facing perceived or experienced stigma may hesitate to seek medical care or follow treatment plans, fearing judgment or discrimination. Understanding the nuances of how stigma influences treatment adherence is critical for healthcare providers to tailor interventions that address not only the medical aspects of a condition but also the psychosocial challenges that stigma poses.

Research consistently highlights the role of stigma in perpetuating health disparities among different demographic groups. Stigmatization may disproportionately affect marginalized populations, exacerbating existing inequalities in access to healthcare, health outcomes, and overall quality of life. Factors such as race, socioeconomic status, and sexual orientation intersect with health conditions, creating compounded effects of stigma that contribute to disparities in health outcomes. Recognizing and addressing these disparities is essential for promoting health equity and ensuring that stigma reduction efforts are targeted towards the most vulnerable and marginalized communities.

The long-term effects of stigma on the quality of life for individuals with health conditions are well-documented in research literature. Persistent exposure to stigma can contribute to a diminished sense of well-being, social isolation, and compromised mental health. These long-term consequences extend beyond the immediate challenges of managing a health condition, influencing various facets of life such as employment opportunities, educational attainment, and interpersonal relationships. Understanding the enduring impact of stigma on quality of life underscores the urgency of implementing interventions that address stigma comprehensively, aiming not only to alleviate immediate consequences but also to promote sustained improvements in overall well-being.

Research findings on the intersection of stigma and health outcomes emphasize the need for holistic approaches in healthcare that go beyond medical interventions. By acknowledging the complex interplay between stigma and various health-related variables, researchers contribute to the development of targeted interventions that address the psychosocial dimensions of health conditions, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for individuals facing stigmatization.

The Role of Social Support in Stigma and Disclosure

Social support plays a pivotal role in mitigating the impact of stigma and facilitating positive outcomes for individuals facing health conditions. The benefits of social support encompass emotional, instrumental, and informational dimensions. Emotionally, supportive relationships provide a buffer against the psychological distress caused by stigma, offering understanding, empathy, and a sense of belonging. Instrumental support involves tangible assistance, such as help with daily tasks or transportation to medical appointments, easing the practical challenges associated with health conditions. Informational support involves the provision of relevant health information and guidance, empowering individuals to make informed decisions about their well-being. The presence of a supportive social network contributes significantly to improved mental health, treatment adherence, and overall quality of life.

Despite the evident benefits, seeking and maintaining social support can pose challenges for individuals facing health conditions. Stigma can create barriers to reaching out for support, as individuals may fear judgment or rejection from others. The anticipation of potential negative reactions may lead to a reluctance to disclose health information, hindering the formation of supportive connections. Additionally, the evolving nature of health conditions and their associated challenges may strain existing relationships, making it challenging to sustain a reliable support system over time. Recognizing and addressing these challenges is crucial for developing interventions that facilitate the creation and maintenance of supportive networks.

The composition and dynamics of an individual’s social network significantly influence the decision-making process in disclosure. Supportive and understanding social networks create a conducive environment for open communication about health conditions, reducing the perceived risks of stigma. Conversely, unsupportive or stigmatizing social networks may deter individuals from disclosing their health status, leading to increased social isolation and potential negative effects on mental health. Understanding how social networks influence disclosure decisions enables researchers and practitioners to tailor interventions that foster supportive environments, empower individuals to share their health experiences, and dismantle stigmatizing attitudes within interpersonal relationships.

Recognizing the integral role of social support in navigating the challenges of stigma and disclosure is essential for promoting the well-being of individuals facing health conditions. By understanding the benefits, addressing the challenges, and exploring the dynamics of social networks in the context of health, interventions can be designed to strengthen supportive relationships, reduce stigma, and enhance overall psychosocial resilience.

Cultural Variations in Stigma and Disclosure

Cultural variations significantly influence the experience of stigma and the disclosure of health conditions across different societies. Cross-cultural differences manifest in diverse belief systems, attitudes towards health, and the perceived significance of specific conditions. Stigmatization may be shaped by cultural norms surrounding illness, where some cultures view certain health conditions as more stigmatizing than others. Understanding these cross-cultural differences is crucial for developing culturally sensitive interventions that acknowledge and respect diverse perspectives, promoting inclusivity in healthcare practices and public awareness campaigns.

Culturally competent healthcare practices are essential for addressing stigma and facilitating disclosure in diverse populations. Cultural competence involves healthcare providers understanding and respecting the cultural backgrounds, values, and beliefs of their patients. Establishing trust and effective communication is particularly vital in mitigating stigma, as patients are more likely to disclose their health conditions when they feel understood and supported. Culturally competent care recognizes the impact of cultural variations on stigma, tailoring interventions to align with the unique needs and preferences of individuals from different cultural backgrounds.

The intersectionality of stigma recognizes that individuals may face multiple forms of stigmatization simultaneously, stemming from various aspects of their identity such as race, gender, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status. The interplay of these intersecting identities can intensify the experience of stigma and impact the decision-making process in disclosure. For example, a person from a marginalized racial group facing a health condition may encounter distinct challenges compared to someone from a privileged background. Acknowledging and addressing the intersectionality of stigma is essential for developing inclusive and equitable strategies that consider the unique experiences of individuals with intersecting marginalized identities.

Understanding the cultural variations in stigma and disclosure is imperative for developing interventions that resonate with diverse populations. By acknowledging cross-cultural differences, promoting cultural competence in healthcare, and recognizing the intersectionality of stigma, health psychologists and practitioners can foster environments that respect and support individuals from various cultural backgrounds as they navigate the complexities of health conditions and stigma.

Future Directions and Implications for Health Interventions

Despite substantial progress in understanding stigma and disclosure in health conditions, there exist research gaps that warrant further exploration. Future studies could delve deeper into the nuanced experiences of specific health conditions, considering how stigma varies across illnesses. Additionally, examining the role of intersectionality in stigma and disclosure, especially in underrepresented populations, can provide valuable insights. Research exploring the long-term effects of stigma reduction interventions and the impact of digital platforms on disclosure in the modern age would contribute to a more comprehensive understanding. Bridging these gaps will refine interventions, ensuring they are tailored to diverse contexts and effectively address evolving societal dynamics.

Innovative strategies are crucial for advancing stigma reduction efforts. Harnessing technology, such as virtual reality or online platforms, can create immersive and accessible environments for educational interventions that challenge stereotypes and promote empathy. Narrative-based interventions, such as storytelling or arts-based approaches, offer compelling ways to humanize health conditions and reduce stigma. Engaging communities directly in the design and implementation of anti-stigma initiatives can enhance cultural relevance and effectiveness. By continuously exploring and adopting novel approaches, health interventions can remain dynamic, engaging, and responsive to the evolving nature of stigma in contemporary society.

To enact substantial and lasting change, stigma reduction must be integrated into healthcare policies at institutional and systemic levels. Policies that prioritize cultural competence training for healthcare providers, ensuring they can navigate diverse patient experiences with sensitivity, are essential. Additionally, incorporating anti-stigma initiatives into medical education curricula can equip future healthcare professionals with the tools to challenge and dismantle stigmatizing attitudes. Policymakers should collaborate with advocacy groups and researchers to develop and implement guidelines that foster stigma-free healthcare environments, promoting inclusivity, and prioritizing the mental health and well-being of individuals facing health conditions.

Considering these future directions and implications for health interventions is crucial for advancing the field of health psychology. By addressing research gaps, embracing innovative approaches, and advocating for policy changes, the discipline can contribute to the development of holistic and effective interventions that reduce stigma, promote disclosure, and ultimately enhance the well-being of individuals navigating the complex intersection of health and societal attitudes.

Conclusion

In examining the intricate dynamics of stigma and disclosure within the context of health psychology, this article has explored diverse facets of this complex phenomenon. Starting with the definition and conceptualization of stigma, we traversed through the types of stigma, factors influencing stigma, and the psychological, behavioral, and cultural consequences. Understanding the significance of disclosure, we explored its definition, importance, challenges, and the decision-making process. We delved into research findings on stigma and health outcomes, the role of social support, cultural variations, and concluded with future directions and implications for health interventions.

Stigma and disclosure remain pivotal areas within health psychology, exerting a profound influence on the well-being of individuals facing health conditions. The impacts of stigma on mental health, treatment adherence, and quality of life underscore the ongoing significance of addressing this issue. Additionally, the complex interplay of cultural variations, the role of social support, and the enduring challenges in disclosure highlight the need for sustained attention and intervention. Recognizing the ongoing significance of stigma and disclosure ensures that health psychologists and practitioners remain dedicated to developing comprehensive, nuanced, and culturally sensitive approaches to improve the lives of those navigating health challenges.

As we move forward, it is imperative to respond to the call for action in advancing research and interventions in the realms of stigma and disclosure within health psychology. Identifying and addressing research gaps, exploring innovative approaches, and integrating stigma reduction into healthcare policies are essential steps. Fostering cross-disciplinary collaborations, embracing diverse methodologies, and prioritizing the voices of those with lived experiences can enrich the understanding of stigma and disclosure. A commitment to dismantling stigma and promoting open communication about health conditions is not only a scholarly pursuit but a moral imperative. This call to action urges the health psychology community to persist in its efforts to create inclusive, empathetic, and supportive environments for individuals navigating the intersection of health and societal perceptions. In doing so, we contribute to the ongoing evolution of health psychology as a discipline that champions the holistic well-being of all individuals, irrespective of their health status.

References:

1. Barney, L. J., Griffiths, K. M., Jorm, A. F., & Christensen, H. (2006). Stigma about depression and its impact on help-seeking intentions. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40(1), 51–54.
2. Corrigan, P. W., & Rao, D. (2012). On the self-stigma of mental illness: Stages, disclosure, and strategies for change. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 57(8), 464–469.
3. Corrigan, P. W., Larson, J. E., & Kuwabara, S. A. (2010). Social psychology of the stigma of mental illness: Public and self-stigma models. In P. Corrigan (Ed.), The Stigma of Disease and Disability: Understanding Causes and Overcoming Injustices (pp. 193–208). American Psychological Association.
4. Earnshaw, V. A., & Quinn, D. M. (2012). The impact of stigma in healthcare on people living with chronic illnesses. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(2), 157–168.
5. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Prentice-Hall.
6. Hatzenbuehler, M. L., & Pachankis, J. E. (2016). Stigma and minority stress as social determinants of health among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: Research evidence and clinical implications. Pediatric Clinics, 63(6), 985–997.
7. Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Dovidio, J. (2009). How does stigma “get under the skin”? The mediating role of emotion regulation. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1282–1289.
8. Herek, G. M., Gillis, J. R., & Cogan, J. C. (2009). Internalized stigma among sexual minority adults: Insights from a social psychological perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(1), 32–43.
9. Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2006). Stigma and its public health implications. The Lancet, 367(9509), 528–529.
10. Livingston, J. D., & Boyd, J. E. (2010). Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 71(12), 2150–2161.
11. Livingston, J. D., & Boyd, J. E. (2010). Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 71(12), 2150–2161.
12. Major, B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421.
13. Mak, W. W., Cheung, R. Y., & Law, R. W. (2009). Social support and psychological adjustment to stigma in patients with HIV/AIDS. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(3), 199–211.
14. Mak, W. W., Cheung, R. Y., & Law, R. W. (2009). Social support and psychological adjustment to stigma in patients with HIV/AIDS. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(3), 199–211.
15. Pescosolido, B. A., & Martin, J. K. (2015). The stigma complex. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 87–116.
16. Puhl, R. M., & Heuer, C. A. (2009). The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity, 17(5), 941–964.
17. Rüsch, N., Angermeyer, M. C., & Corrigan, P. W. (2005). Mental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. European Psychiatry, 20(8), 529–539.
18. Thornicroft, G., Brohan, E., Kassam, A., & Lewis-Holmes, E. (2008). Reducing stigma and discrimination: Candidate interventions. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 2(1), 1–8.
19. van Brakel, W. H. (2006). Measuring health-related stigma: A literature review. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 11(3), 307–334.
20. Yang, L. H., Kleinman, A., Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Lee, S., & Good, B. (2007). Culture and stigma: Adding moral experience to stigma theory. Social Science & Medicine, 64(7), 1524–1535.