Affective traits represent stable individual differences in emotional tendencies that significantly influence workplace behavior, job performance, and organizational outcomes within industrial-organizational psychology. These relatively enduring dispositions to experience positive or negative emotions across situations and time have emerged as crucial variables for understanding how employees respond to work environments, interact with colleagues, and perform job-related tasks. The primary affective traits examined in organizational research include positive affectivity (the tendency to experience positive emotions such as enthusiasm, alertness, and determination) and negative affectivity (the propensity to experience negative emotions including distress, upset, and dissatisfaction). Research has demonstrated that affective traits influence numerous workplace outcomes including job satisfaction, organizational commitment, leadership effectiveness, team dynamics, performance ratings, and stress responses. Understanding affective traits is essential for organizational practitioners involved in personnel selection, performance management, team composition, and employee development. Contemporary research has expanded beyond the basic positive and negative affectivity distinction to examine more specific emotional traits and their workplace implications, while also investigating the mechanisms through which affective traits influence organizational behavior and the conditions that moderate these relationships.
Introduction
The study of individual differences has been central to industrial-organizational psychology since its inception, with researchers and practitioners recognizing that people vary systematically in ways that influence their workplace behavior and performance. Among the various dimensions of individual differences, affective traits have emerged as particularly important for understanding how employees experience and respond to organizational environments.
Affective traits represent stable dispositions in emotional reactivity and mood that transcend specific situations or contexts. Unlike temporary emotional states that fluctuate in response to immediate circumstances, affective traits reflect consistent patterns in how individuals tend to feel and react emotionally across different situations and over time. This stability makes affective traits valuable predictors of workplace behavior and outcomes, as they provide insight into how employees are likely to respond to various organizational challenges and opportunities.
The importance of affective traits in industrial-organizational psychology has grown significantly over the past several decades as researchers have recognized that workplace behavior is not solely determined by cognitive abilities, skills, or situational factors. Emotions play crucial roles in how employees perceive their work environment, make decisions, interact with others, and perform their job responsibilities. Understanding individual differences in emotional tendencies provides valuable insights for organizational decision-making related to selection, placement, training, and management practices.
The theoretical foundation for studying affective traits in organizational contexts draws from both personality psychology and emotion research. The recognition that emotional experiences have both state and trait components has led to sophisticated models that distinguish between momentary emotional responses and stable emotional dispositions. This distinction is crucial for organizational applications, as it helps practitioners understand which emotional phenomena are likely to be consistent across time and situations versus those that are more malleable and context-dependent.
Contemporary research on affective traits has revealed their influence on numerous workplace outcomes and processes. These traits affect how employees perceive and interpret workplace events, how they interact with supervisors and colleagues, how they respond to stress and challenges, and how they approach various work tasks. Understanding these relationships has important implications for creating more effective and satisfying work environments while also achieving organizational goals and objectives.
Conceptual Foundations and Theoretical Framework
Defining Affective Traits
Affective traits represent stable individual differences in the tendency to experience certain types of emotions across various situations and over extended periods of time. These traits reflect dispositional characteristics that influence how individuals typically feel and react emotionally, distinguishing them from temporary emotional states that may fluctuate in response to immediate circumstances or specific events.
The conceptual foundation of affective traits rests on the distinction between affect as a state versus affect as a trait. Affective states are temporary emotional experiences that vary in response to situational factors, while affective traits represent stable dispositions that influence the likelihood, intensity, and duration of emotional experiences. This distinction is crucial for organizational applications because it helps predict which emotional phenomena are likely to be consistent across different work situations and time periods.
Affective traits are typically conceptualized along dimensional rather than categorical lines, meaning that individuals vary continuously in their levels of different emotional tendencies rather than falling into discrete categories. This dimensional approach allows for more nuanced understanding of individual differences and more precise prediction of workplace behavior and outcomes.
The stability of affective traits does not imply complete rigidity or unchangeability. Rather, these traits represent central tendencies around which individual emotional experiences may fluctuate. Environmental factors, life experiences, and developmental processes can influence affective traits, but these changes typically occur gradually over extended periods rather than rapidly in response to immediate circumstances.
Positive and Negative Affectivity
The most extensively studied affective traits in organizational psychology are positive affectivity (PA) and negative affectivity (NA), originally conceptualized and measured by David Watson and Lee Anna Clark. These two dimensions represent orthogonal factors that capture the major axes of affective experience and have proven to be robust predictors of workplace behavior and outcomes.
Positive affectivity reflects the tendency to experience positive emotions such as enthusiasm, alertness, energy, confidence, and determination. Individuals high in positive affectivity tend to be cheerful, energetic, and optimistic, approaching situations with enthusiasm and confidence. They are more likely to experience joy, excitement, and satisfaction across various life domains, including work settings.
Negative affectivity represents the tendency to experience negative emotions such as distress, upset, guilt, fear, and anger. Individuals high in negative affectivity tend to focus on negative aspects of themselves and their environment, experiencing higher levels of anxiety, depression, irritability, and dissatisfaction. They are more likely to perceive situations as threatening or problematic and to experience stress and discomfort across various contexts.
Importantly, positive and negative affectivity are not simply opposite ends of a single continuum but represent independent dimensions. This means that individuals can be high on both dimensions (experiencing both positive and negative emotions intensely), low on both dimensions (experiencing emotions less intensely overall), or high on one dimension while being low on the other.
Measurement and Assessment
The assessment of affective traits typically involves self-report instruments that ask individuals to rate their general tendencies to experience various emotions. The most widely used measure is the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), developed by Watson and Clark, which assesses both positive and negative affectivity using adjective checklists.
The PANAS presents individuals with lists of emotion-related adjectives (such as “enthusiastic,” “inspired,” “nervous,” or “distressed”) and asks them to rate the extent to which they generally feel this way. Different time frames can be specified, such as “in general,” “during the past week,” or “during the past year,” depending on the research or practical objectives.
Other assessment approaches include more comprehensive personality inventories that include affective trait scales as part of broader personality assessments. These instruments may provide more detailed information about specific emotional tendencies while also assessing related personality characteristics that may influence workplace behavior.
The measurement of affective traits raises important considerations regarding social desirability bias, as individuals may be motivated to present themselves in favorable ways when completing assessments for employment-related purposes. Researchers and practitioners have developed various strategies for addressing these concerns, including using subtle or indirect measures, combining self-reports with other assessment methods, and providing appropriate contextualization and instructions.
Workplace Applications and Organizational Outcomes
Job Performance and Work Effectiveness
Research has consistently demonstrated relationships between affective traits and various indicators of job performance and work effectiveness. These relationships operate through multiple mechanisms and vary depending on the specific performance criteria and job characteristics under consideration.
Positive affectivity has been associated with higher levels of job performance across various occupational domains. Employees high in positive affectivity tend to be more energetic, persistent, and optimistic, leading to greater effort and persistence in the face of challenges. They are also more likely to engage in proactive behaviors, seek out opportunities for improvement, and maintain motivation during difficult periods.
The relationship between positive affectivity and performance appears to be particularly strong for jobs that require interpersonal interaction, creativity, or dealing with challenges and setbacks. The energetic and optimistic orientation associated with high positive affectivity can be especially valuable in roles that involve customer service, sales, leadership, or innovation.
Negative affectivity shows more complex relationships with job performance. While high negative affectivity can be detrimental to performance through increased stress, anxiety, and negative focus, some research suggests that moderate levels may actually enhance performance in certain contexts by promoting attention to detail, careful decision-making, and awareness of potential problems.
The performance implications of affective traits also depend on job characteristics and organizational context. Jobs that involve high stress, interpersonal conflict, or emotional demands may be particularly challenging for individuals high in negative affectivity, while jobs that require careful attention to potential problems or systematic analysis may benefit from the cautious orientation associated with this trait.
Job Attitudes and Work-Related Well-being
Affective traits have profound influences on job attitudes and work-related well-being, affecting how employees experience and evaluate their work environments. These relationships are among the strongest and most consistent findings in organizational research on affective traits.
Job satisfaction shows strong correlations with both positive and negative affectivity. Employees high in positive affectivity tend to report higher levels of job satisfaction, even when controlling for objective job characteristics. This relationship occurs because positive affectivity influences how individuals perceive and interpret their work experiences, leading them to focus on positive aspects and maintain optimistic outlooks.
Conversely, negative affectivity is associated with lower job satisfaction and higher levels of job-related stress and strain. Employees high in negative affectivity tend to focus on negative aspects of their work environment, experience greater distress in response to workplace challenges, and report lower levels of overall satisfaction and well-being.
Organizational commitment, both affective and continuance, also shows relationships with affective traits. Positive affectivity promotes emotional attachment to the organization and identification with organizational goals and values. Negative affectivity may undermine commitment through increased focus on organizational problems and dissatisfaction with work experiences.
The relationship between affective traits and work attitudes raises important questions about the direction of causality and the stability of these relationships over time. While affective traits influence how individuals evaluate their work experiences, positive work experiences may also influence emotional well-being and potentially affect trait-like emotional tendencies over extended periods.
Leadership and Interpersonal Effectiveness
Affective traits play crucial roles in leadership effectiveness and interpersonal relationships in organizational settings. The emotional dispositions of leaders influence their own behavior as well as the responses of followers and team members.
Leaders high in positive affectivity tend to be more inspirational, optimistic, and energizing in their interactions with followers. They are better able to communicate vision and enthusiasm, maintain morale during difficult periods, and create positive work climates that promote engagement and motivation. Research on transformational leadership has found positive relationships between leader positive affectivity and follower satisfaction, performance, and commitment.
The relationship between negative affectivity and leadership effectiveness is more complex. While high negative affectivity may interfere with leadership through increased stress, pessimism, and negative focus, some research suggests that moderate levels may enhance certain aspects of leadership by promoting careful decision-making and attention to potential problems.
Affective traits also influence team dynamics and interpersonal relationships among team members. Team members high in positive affectivity tend to contribute to positive team climates, facilitate cooperation and communication, and help maintain team cohesion during challenges. Those high in negative affectivity may contribute to conflict, reduce team morale, and interfere with effective teamwork.
The contagion effects of emotions mean that individual affective traits can influence entire work groups through social and emotional contagion processes. Team members tend to “catch” emotions from each other, meaning that the affective traits of influential team members can have broader impacts on team functioning and performance.
Stress and Coping Responses
Affective traits significantly influence how employees experience and respond to workplace stress, making them important considerations for understanding occupational health and well-being. These relationships have important implications for employee assistance programs, stress management interventions, and organizational policies related to employee welfare.
Individuals high in negative affectivity tend to experience higher levels of workplace stress and report more physical and psychological symptoms of strain. They are more likely to perceive workplace demands as threatening or overwhelming and may have more difficulty maintaining perspective during challenging periods. This increased stress reactivity can lead to various negative outcomes including reduced performance, increased absenteeism, and health problems.
Positive affectivity appears to provide some protection against the negative effects of workplace stress. Individuals high in positive affectivity tend to use more adaptive coping strategies, maintain more optimistic outlooks during difficult periods, and show greater resilience in the face of challenges. They may also be more likely to seek social support and engage in problem-solving behaviors that help address stressful situations.
The coping strategies associated with different affective traits help explain their differential relationships with stress outcomes. Positive affectivity promotes approach-oriented coping strategies such as problem-solving, seeking support, and positive reframing, while negative affectivity is associated with avoidance-oriented strategies such as denial, disengagement, and rumination.
Understanding these relationships has important implications for organizational interventions aimed at reducing workplace stress and promoting employee well-being. Interventions may need to be tailored to individual differences in affective traits to be maximally effective.
Research Findings and Empirical Evidence
Meta-Analytic Evidence
Comprehensive meta-analytic reviews have provided robust evidence for the relationships between affective traits and various workplace outcomes, establishing the practical significance and generalizability of these effects across different organizational contexts and populations.
A meta-analysis by Judge and Kammeyer-Mueller (2012) examined relationships between affective traits and job satisfaction across numerous studies, finding strong correlations that remained significant even after controlling for other personality variables and situational factors. The effect sizes were substantial, indicating that affective traits account for meaningful proportions of variance in job satisfaction.
Meta-analytic evidence has also supported relationships between affective traits and job performance, though these relationships are more complex and depend on various moderating factors. Positive affectivity shows consistent positive relationships with performance, while negative affectivity shows more variable relationships that depend on job characteristics and performance criteria.
Research syntheses have documented relationships between affective traits and various other workplace outcomes including organizational citizenship behaviors, counterproductive work behaviors, leadership effectiveness, and career success. These findings provide strong empirical foundation for the practical importance of affective traits in organizational settings.
The consistency of findings across different studies, samples, and cultural contexts provides confidence in the robustness and generalizability of affective trait effects. However, meta-analytic evidence has also revealed important moderating factors that influence the strength and direction of these relationships.
Longitudinal and Causal Evidence
While much research on affective traits has been cross-sectional, longitudinal studies have provided important insights into the causal relationships and temporal dynamics involved in these phenomena. These studies have addressed questions about the stability of affective traits over time and their causal relationships with workplace outcomes.
Longitudinal research has confirmed the relative stability of affective traits over extended periods, supporting their conceptualization as trait-like individual differences rather than temporary states. However, this research has also revealed that affective traits can show gradual changes over time, particularly in response to significant life experiences or environmental changes.
Studies examining causal relationships have generally supported the hypothesis that affective traits influence workplace outcomes rather than being merely consequences of work experiences. However, some evidence suggests bidirectional relationships, with positive work experiences potentially influencing affective traits over extended periods.
The temporal dynamics of affective trait effects have revealed that these influences may be both immediate and cumulative. Affective traits influence day-to-day workplace experiences and behaviors, and these effects can accumulate over time to produce larger impacts on career outcomes and organizational effectiveness.
Cross-Cultural and International Research
Research on affective traits has been conducted across various cultural contexts, providing insights into the universality and cultural specificity of these phenomena. This research has important implications for multinational organizations and diverse workforces.
Cross-cultural studies have generally supported the existence of positive and negative affectivity as universal dimensions of emotional experience, though cultural differences have been found in mean levels, behavioral expressions, and relationships with outcomes. Some cultures may encourage or discourage certain types of emotional expression, influencing how affective traits are manifested in workplace behavior.
International research has revealed cultural differences in the relationships between affective traits and workplace outcomes. For example, the relationship between positive affectivity and job performance may be stronger in cultures that value individual achievement and emotional expression compared to cultures that emphasize group harmony and emotional restraint.
These cultural considerations have important implications for global organizations that must understand how affective traits operate across different cultural contexts. Selection systems, management practices, and organizational policies may need to account for cultural differences in affective trait expression and effects.
Neuroscientific and Biological Research
Contemporary research has begun to examine the biological and neuroscientific bases of affective traits, providing insights into the mechanisms underlying individual differences in emotional reactivity and their workplace implications.
Neuroimaging research has identified brain regions and networks associated with positive and negative affectivity, including areas involved in reward processing, threat detection, and emotional regulation. These findings help explain why affective traits show stability over time and consistency across situations.
Research on genetic influences has revealed that affective traits have substantial heritability, indicating that individual differences in emotional tendencies have both environmental and biological origins. This research has implications for understanding the development and malleability of affective traits.
Physiological research has examined relationships between affective traits and various biological markers including cortisol levels, cardiovascular reactivity, and immune system functioning. These findings help explain the health and well-being consequences of different affective traits and their implications for workplace stress and occupational health.
Practical Applications and Interventions
Personnel Selection and Assessment
Understanding affective traits has important implications for personnel selection and assessment, particularly for positions where emotional characteristics are relevant to job performance and organizational fit. However, the application of affective trait assessment in selection contexts requires careful consideration of legal, ethical, and practical issues.
For positions involving significant interpersonal interaction, customer service, or leadership responsibilities, affective traits may be relevant selection criteria. Positive affectivity may be advantageous for roles requiring enthusiasm, optimism, and interpersonal warmth, while moderate negative affectivity might be beneficial for positions requiring attention to detail and risk awareness.
The assessment of affective traits in selection contexts raises important concerns about adverse impact, privacy, and the potential for applicant faking. Organizations must ensure that affective trait assessments are job-related, valid, and legally defensible. This may require conducting job analyses to establish the relevance of specific affective traits to job performance and organizational effectiveness.
Alternative assessment approaches may be used to evaluate affective traits indirectly, such as through structured interviews, situational judgment tests, or assessment center exercises that elicit emotional responses. These methods may provide more valid and legally defensible approaches to assessing emotional characteristics relevant to job performance.
The use of affective trait information in selection decisions should be balanced against other job-relevant factors and should consider the potential for both positive and negative consequences of different emotional characteristics depending on job requirements and organizational context.
Training and Development Programs
Affective traits have important implications for the design and implementation of training and development programs, both as factors that influence training effectiveness and as potential targets for developmental interventions.
Individual differences in affective traits influence how employees respond to different training methods and learning environments. Participants high in positive affectivity may respond well to interactive, enthusiastic training approaches, while those high in negative affectivity may prefer more structured, systematic approaches that address potential concerns and provide clear guidance.
Training programs can be designed to help employees understand and manage their affective traits more effectively. Emotional intelligence training, stress management programs, and resilience building interventions may help employees develop better awareness and control of their emotional responses.
Development programs for managers and leaders should address the role of affective traits in leadership effectiveness and team dynamics. Leaders need to understand how their own affective traits influence their leadership style and how they can work effectively with team members who have different emotional characteristics.
The evaluation of training effectiveness should consider how affective traits might influence training outcomes and transfer. Programs may need different evaluation approaches for participants with different affective trait profiles to accurately assess training effectiveness and identify areas for improvement.
Organizational Climate and Culture
Affective traits have important implications for organizational climate and culture, both as factors that are influenced by organizational characteristics and as individual differences that contribute to collective organizational phenomena.
Organizations can consider affective trait distributions when designing workplace policies, practices, and physical environments. Work environments that promote positive emotions and minimize unnecessary stress may be particularly beneficial for employees high in negative affectivity, while challenging and dynamic environments may be preferred by those high in positive affectivity.
Team composition decisions can consider affective trait diversity to create teams with complementary emotional characteristics. Teams with appropriate mixes of positive and negative affectivity may achieve better balance between optimism and caution, enthusiasm and attention to detail.
Organizational change initiatives should consider how different affective traits influence responses to change and uncertainty. Employees high in negative affectivity may need additional support and communication during change processes, while those high in positive affectivity may serve as change champions and sources of optimism.
Leadership development programs should address how leaders’ affective traits influence organizational climate and culture. Leaders play crucial roles in shaping emotional climates, and understanding these influences can help organizations develop more effective leadership capabilities.
Performance Management and Feedback
Affective traits have important implications for performance management systems and feedback processes, influencing both how employees respond to feedback and how supervisors should tailor their management approaches.
Performance feedback should be delivered in ways that account for individual differences in affective traits. Employees high in negative affectivity may be more sensitive to criticism and may need feedback that is balanced, constructive, and focused on specific behaviors rather than general evaluations.
Goal-setting processes should consider how affective traits influence motivation and goal pursuit. Employees high in positive affectivity may respond well to challenging, inspirational goals, while those high in negative affectivity may prefer more specific, achievable goals with clear guidelines for success.
Recognition and reward systems should account for different motivational patterns associated with affective traits. Public recognition may be particularly motivating for employees high in positive affectivity, while private recognition and security-oriented rewards may be more effective for those high in negative affectivity.
Performance improvement plans should be tailored to individual affective trait profiles, with different approaches for employees who need motivation and enthusiasm versus those who need structure and anxiety reduction.
Contemporary Developments and Future Directions
Expanded Models of Affective Traits
Contemporary research has moved beyond the basic positive and negative affectivity model to examine more specific and nuanced affective traits that may have particular relevance for workplace behavior and outcomes. These expanded models provide more detailed understanding of individual differences in emotional experience.
Research on discrete emotions has examined specific emotional traits such as trait anger, trait anxiety, trait excitement, and trait contentment. These specific emotional dispositions may have different relationships with workplace outcomes and may be more precisely targeted through interventions and management practices.
The examination of mixed emotional experiences has revealed that individuals may simultaneously experience positive and negative emotions, and that individual differences exist in the tendency to experience emotional complexity. These findings have implications for understanding how employees respond to organizational events and challenges.
Research on emotional granularity has examined individual differences in the ability to distinguish among different emotional experiences. Employees with higher emotional granularity may have better emotional regulation skills and may respond more adaptively to workplace challenges.
Contemporary models also consider the dynamic aspects of affective traits, including individual differences in emotional variability, emotional inertia, and emotional reactivity. These dynamic characteristics may be as important as mean levels of emotional experience for understanding workplace behavior.
Technology and Digital Work Environments
The increasing prevalence of technology-mediated work and digital work environments has created new contexts for understanding how affective traits influence workplace behavior and outcomes. These developments present both opportunities and challenges for applying affective trait research.
Virtual work environments may amplify or diminish the effects of certain affective traits. The reduced face-to-face interaction in virtual work may make it more difficult for employees high in positive affectivity to energize and influence others, while it may provide some protection for those high in negative affectivity from social stressors.
Technology-based assessment tools are being developed to measure affective traits and emotional states in real-time using various sensors, behavioral indicators, and ecological momentary assessment approaches. These tools may provide more accurate and dynamic assessment of affective characteristics.
Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches are being applied to understand and predict the workplace effects of affective traits. These technologies may enable more sophisticated matching of individuals to jobs and work environments based on affective trait profiles.
The design of digital work tools and platforms should consider how different affective traits influence user experience and effectiveness. Interface design, communication tools, and collaboration platforms may need to accommodate different emotional characteristics and preferences.
Integration with Other Individual Differences
Contemporary research increasingly recognizes that affective traits interact with other individual differences to influence workplace behavior and outcomes. This integrative approach provides more comprehensive understanding of individual differences and their organizational implications.
The interaction between affective traits and cognitive ability has revealed complex patterns where emotional characteristics may enhance or impair the expression of cognitive capabilities. High positive affectivity may facilitate the application of cognitive skills through increased motivation and persistence, while high negative affectivity may interfere through anxiety and distraction.
Personality research has examined how affective traits relate to and interact with the Five-Factor Model of personality. While affective traits show relationships with several personality factors, they provide unique predictive validity and represent distinct individual differences.
Cultural intelligence and other cross-cultural competencies show important relationships with affective traits. Employees with certain affective trait profiles may be better suited for international assignments or multicultural work environments.
The integration of affective traits with motivational individual differences has revealed how emotional dispositions influence goal-setting, effort allocation, and persistence in the face of obstacles.
Interventions and Organizational Applications
Research on interventions targeting affective traits and their workplace effects is expanding, with development of both individual-focused and organizational-level approaches to managing and leveraging affective individual differences.
Positive psychology interventions adapted for workplace settings have shown promise for enhancing positive affectivity and associated outcomes. These interventions may include gratitude exercises, strengths identification, and positive relationship building activities.
Mindfulness and emotional regulation training programs are being developed to help employees better understand and manage their affective traits. These programs may be particularly beneficial for employees high in negative affectivity who experience workplace stress and emotional difficulties.
Organizational design interventions are being developed to create work environments that are optimally suited for employees with different affective trait profiles. These approaches may include job crafting, team composition strategies, and workplace design modifications.
Technology-assisted interventions are being developed to provide real-time support for employees based on their affective trait profiles and current emotional states. These interventions may include personalized stress management tools, mood regulation apps, and adaptive work environment modifications.
Conclusion
Affective traits represent fundamental individual differences that significantly influence workplace behavior, organizational outcomes, and employee well-being. The extensive research on positive and negative affectivity has established these characteristics as important predictors of job satisfaction, performance, leadership effectiveness, and various other organizational phenomena. Understanding these emotional dispositions provides valuable insights for practitioners involved in personnel selection, performance management, training and development, and organizational design.
The practical applications of affective trait research continue to expand as organizations recognize the importance of emotional characteristics in determining workplace effectiveness and employee satisfaction. Contemporary developments in assessment technology, intervention approaches, and theoretical understanding promise to further enhance the utility of affective trait research for organizational practice.
Future research directions include the development of more sophisticated models of affective traits, better understanding of their interactions with other individual differences, and the creation of more effective interventions for managing and leveraging these characteristics. The integration of neuroscientific research, technology applications, and cross-cultural considerations will likely continue to expand our understanding of how affective traits operate in organizational contexts.
The field’s evolution toward more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of affective traits reflects the broader recognition that workplace behavior is multiply determined by cognitive, emotional, motivational, and situational factors. Affective traits represent one important component of this complex system, and their continued study will contribute to more effective and humane organizational practices that benefit both individuals and organizations.
As workplaces continue to evolve in response to technological, social, and economic changes, the relevance of affective traits for understanding and predicting workplace behavior is likely to remain high. The emotional aspects of work experience are fundamental to human functioning and well-being, making affective traits enduring considerations for organizational psychology research and practice.
References
- Ashkanasy, N. M., & Daus, C. S. (2002). Emotion in the workplace: The new challenge for managers. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.6640191
- Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279-307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135156
- George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.299
- George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310-329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.310
- Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). Job attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 341-367. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100511
- Kaplan, S., Bradley, J. C., Luchman, J. N., & Haynes, D. (2009). On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 162-176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013115
- Larsen, R. J., & Ketelaar, T. (1991). Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.132
- Thoresen, C. J., Kaplan, S. A., Barsky, A. P., Warren, C. R., & de Chermont, K. (2003). The affective underpinnings of job perceptions and attitudes: A meta-analytic review and integration. Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), 914-945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.914
- Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Mood-and-Temperament/David-Watson/9781572305229
- Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 465-490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.465
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
- Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219
- Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191308596180025
- Yik, M., Russell, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2011). A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion, 11(4), 705-731. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023980
- Zautra, A. J., Potter, P. T., & Reich, J. W. (1997). The independence of affects is context-dependent: An integrative model of the relationship between positive and negative affect. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 17, 75-102. https://www.springer.com/series/5963