The field of forensic psychology is undoubtedly captivating, drawing both students and the general public due to its inherent allure. Often described as “sexy,” clinical forensic psychology possesses a unique appeal that engages individuals’ interest in intriguing and complex ways. However, this allure also presents significant challenges. While many believe they have a comprehensive understanding of forensic psychology and the multifaceted roles of forensic psychologists, these perceptions are often shaped by sensationalized portrayals in the media, leading to misconceptions.
In this section, we aim to preserve the captivating nature of forensic psychology while providing a clear and accurate portrayal of the discipline. We will achieve this by defining clinical forensic psychology, exploring its intricate relationship with the legal system, elucidating key topics within the field, delineating the responsibilities of forensic psychologists, and outlining the rigorous training and education required to become a proficient forensic psychologist.
Definition of Clinical Forensic Psychology: Clinical forensic psychology is a specialized branch of psychology that seamlessly integrates clinical expertise with the legal domain. This field is characterized by its capacity to captivate individuals, drawing them into the intersection of psychology and law, where complex human behaviors and legal principles intersect. Clinical forensic psychologists navigate this intersection with the aim of providing valuable insights, assessments, and interventions that contribute to legal proceedings and justice.
Challenges in the Field: The appeal of forensic psychology often arises from its portrayal in the media, where the excitement of criminal investigations and courtroom drama takes center stage. However, these portrayals can be misleading, creating a gap between public perception and the true responsibilities of forensic psychologists. Bridging this gap requires a nuanced understanding of the field’s intricacies and the recognition that forensic psychology encompasses a diverse range of roles and responsibilities.
Relationship with the Law: Clinical forensic psychology operates within a complex and often challenging relationship with the legal system. Forensic psychologists must navigate ethical considerations, while providing expert opinions and assessments that hold significant sway in legal proceedings. This intersection of psychology and law demands a high level of professional responsibility and ethical conduct.
Key Topics and Responsibilities: Forensic psychologists engage in a multifaceted array of topics and responsibilities, including the assessment of mental competence, evaluation of risk for violent behavior, scrutiny of witness credibility, diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in victims, and rehabilitation programs for incarcerated individuals. These responsibilities underscore the critical role forensic psychologists play in promoting justice, mental health, and public safety.
Training and Education: Achieving proficiency as a forensic psychologist demands a rigorous educational journey. Prospective forensic psychologists typically pursue doctoral degrees in clinical psychology or forensic psychology. Moreover, they must obtain licensure and certification, which necessitates supervised practice, comprehensive examinations, and ongoing professional development.
In conclusion, forensic psychology’s undeniable allure is complemented by its complexity and multifaceted nature. While its captivating aspects are often portrayed in the media, it is essential to recognize the field’s genuine contributions to the legal and mental health systems. Forensic psychologists bridge the gap between psychology and the law, offering valuable insights, assessments, and interventions that uphold principles of justice and fairness in legal proceedings.
What is Clinical Forensic Psychology?
Forensic psychology is a captivating and multifaceted discipline, renowned for its inherent allure and complexity. At its core, forensic psychology entails the application of psychological principles and practices within the legal system, where it plays a pivotal role in various aspects of legal proceedings. While this fundamental definition provides a broad overview, the field’s true essence lies in its diverse interpretations and specialized domains.
The Scope of Forensic Psychology: Clinical and Beyond
Debates have arisen within the field regarding the scope of forensic psychology. Some proponents advocate for a narrow interpretation, emphasizing its clinical facets, encompassing the assessment and treatment of mental disorders. In contrast, a broader perspective advocates for the inclusion of nonclinical domains, such as eyewitness identification and jury decision-making processes. Our focus herein centers on the clinical aspects of forensic psychology, thus defining it as the application of clinical psychology to the legal system.
The Intrigue of Forensic Psychology
Now, one might wonder why forensic psychology, despite its seemingly straightforward definition, remains a field of profound interest and fascination. Indeed, this captivating allure arises from several factors:
1. Intersection of Psychology and the Law: Forensic psychology operates at the intersection of psychology and the law, where the complexities of human behavior intertwine with legal principles. This convergence provides a rich and dynamic landscape for exploration and application.
2. Real-World Impact: Forensic psychologists engage in practices that directly impact real-world scenarios, including legal proceedings, criminal investigations, and rehabilitation programs. Their work contributes to the pursuit of justice, mental health advocacy, and public safety enhancement.
3. Complex Problem Solving: Forensic psychologists grapple with intricate challenges, such as assessing mental competence, evaluating the risk of violent behavior, and scrutinizing witness credibility. These multifaceted issues demand a blend of clinical expertise and legal acumen.
4. Ethical Considerations: Working within the legal system necessitates a keen awareness of ethical considerations. Forensic psychologists must navigate the delicate balance between professional responsibilities, ethical obligations, and the pursuit of justice.
5. Media Intrigue: The portrayal of forensic psychology in popular media, characterized by criminal investigations, courtroom drama, and psychological profiling, contributes to its enduring fascination.
The Continuing Fascination of Forensic Psychology
In conclusion, forensic psychology’s enduring allure and complexity stem from its pivotal role at the crossroads of psychology and the law. Its multifaceted nature, encompassing clinical practice, psychological assessment, and legal expertise, ensures its continued status as a captivating and dynamically evolving field. Forensic psychology remains an invaluable contributor to the pursuit of justice and the understanding of human behavior within the legal context, making it a topic of enduring intrigue and significance.
Sensational Aspects of Forensic Psychology
Forensic psychology often finds itself shrouded in sensationalized portrayals, perpetuated by popular culture and misinformed perceptions. While these depictions have their place in entertainment, they can obscure the field’s actual nature and scope. It is crucial to dispel these misconceptions and foster a more accurate understanding of forensic psychology.
The Influence of Media Misconceptions
Media outlets, including online encyclopedias, often perpetuate misconceptions about forensic psychology. For instance, some claim that forensic psychologists primarily engage in the processing of crime scenes. While this assertion may seem plausible in the context of thrilling crime dramas, it does not accurately represent the reality of forensic psychology.
The Role of Pop Culture
Forensic psychology’s portrayal in movies and television series can be captivating, featuring psychologists as brilliant investigators who delve into the minds of criminals with their psychological techniques. Iconic films like “Silence of the Lambs” and “Kiss the Girls” have contributed to this perception. Additionally, shows like “Profiler” have ventured into the realm of psychic detectives, introducing elements unsupported by empirical evidence.
Demystifying Forensic Psychology
It is vital to separate fact from fiction when it comes to forensic psychology:
1. Empirical Foundation: Forensic psychology is grounded in empirical research and evidence-based practices. Psychologists in this field rely on established psychological principles to assess, evaluate, and address legal issues.
2. Real-World Application: While forensic psychologists do not operate as psychic detectives, they play essential roles in various legal contexts. They assess mental competence, evaluate witness credibility, and provide expert testimony, contributing to fair and just legal processes.
3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Forensic psychology often involves collaboration with professionals from diverse backgrounds, including law enforcement, legal experts, and medical professionals, to address complex legal issues.
4. Ethical Practice: Forensic psychologists adhere to ethical guidelines, maintaining the highest standards of professional conduct in their work within the legal system.
Promoting Accurate Understanding
In conclusion, it is essential to distinguish between the sensationalized portrayals of forensic psychology in popular media and the actual work conducted by forensic psychologists. By promoting an accurate understanding of the field’s principles and practices, we can foster a more informed perspective and appreciation for the crucial role forensic psychology plays within the legal system.
The Reality of Forensic Psychology
While forensic psychology may not mirror the sensational portrayals seen in movies and TV shows, its real-world applications are intriguing and impactful. In actual practice, forensic psychologists are typically not involved in the initial stages of criminal investigations. Instead, their contributions to the legal system occur after a crime has been committed or legal proceedings have commenced. This distinction reveals the authentic essence of forensic psychology.
Limited Involvement in Crime Scene Investigation
Forensic psychologists’ involvement in crime scene investigation is far from the norm. A study conducted by Torres, Boccaccini, and Miller (2006) found that fewer than 10 percent of forensic psychologists surveyed had ever engaged in crime scene investigation or criminal profiling. Criminal profiling, an often-mythologized aspect of forensic psychology, was initially developed by the FBI’s Behavioral Sciences Unit in the 1970s to assist in tracking serial murderers. However, this endeavor was primarily investigative in nature and did not heavily rely on psychological expertise or methods. Although forensic psychologists now collaborate with the FBI, criminal profiling remains primarily a law enforcement tool with limited psychological applications.
Forensic Psychology in Legal Contexts
Forensic psychologists primarily enter the legal arena once legal processes are underway. In line with our earlier definition of forensic psychology as the application of clinical psychology to the legal system, their role closely aligns with clinical psychology’s focus on personality assessment and mental health treatment.
Much like clinical psychologists, forensic psychologists assess and evaluate individuals in legal contexts. Their responsibilities may include:
- Assessment of Mental Health: Forensic psychologists assess individuals for mental health conditions, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) resulting from an automobile accident.
- Custody Evaluations: They perform custody evaluations to provide the court with expert insights into the best custody arrangements for children in cases involving separated or divorced parents.
- Treatment and Intervention: In situations such as sexual assault cases or depression, forensic psychologists may provide treatment and emotional support to those affected.
Forensic psychologists bring psychological expertise to legal matters, aiding in the fair and just resolution of cases within the legal system. While their work may lack the glamour of crime scene investigations seen in the media, it plays a pivotal role in ensuring justice and addressing psychological aspects of legal issues.
The Difficult Application of Psychology to the Legal System
Harmonizing Psychology and the Law: Navigating Inherent Differences
The intersection of psychology and the law offers numerous prospects for valuable collaboration, but it also presents inherent conflicts. Judges and attorneys, with their distinct training and perspectives, often view human behavior differently from psychologists. These differences can pose challenges to the partnership between these fields. However, with a clear understanding of these disparities, there exists the potential for a constructive and harmonious alliance.
Inherent Discrepancies in Perspective
Judges and attorneys, steeped in the legal tradition, tend to approach human behavior from a perspective that significantly differs from that of psychologists. This divergence in viewpoint is at the crux of the unique challenges faced when these two disciplines intersect. To foster effective collaboration, it is crucial to acknowledge and address these differences.
Seeking Common Ground
Despite the contrasting lenses through which psychologists and legal professionals view human behavior, there is a substantial common ground. Both fields share a commitment to justice and fairness, seeking to ensure that legal proceedings are just and equitable for all parties involved. Recognizing this shared goal provides a foundation upon which cooperation and mutual understanding can be built.
The Road to a Productive Partnership
To overcome the inherent conflicts and cultivate a productive partnership between psychology and the law, it is essential for both sides to engage in open and respectful dialogue. Psychologists can contribute their expertise in understanding human behavior and cognition, offering valuable insights that can aid legal professionals in their decision-making processes. Simultaneously, legal experts can provide context and guidance regarding the practical applications of these insights within the legal system.
Through ongoing communication, education, and collaboration, psychologists and legal professionals can work together to bridge the gap between their respective perspectives. This harmonious relationship has the potential to enhance the legal system’s fairness, effectiveness, and the pursuit of justice for all. Read more about Psychology Applied to the Legal System.
Important Issues In Forensic Psychology
Forensic psychologists play a crucial role in assisting courts with their specialized psychological expertise, despite the inherent challenges stemming from the intersection of forensic psychology and the legal system (Goldstein, 2003; Melton et al., 1997; Wiener & Hess, 2006). Their expertise is applied across various legal contexts, encompassing both criminal and civil matters, and involving individuals of all age groups, including adults and children. Their responsibilities encompass a wide spectrum of activities, from conducting psychological evaluations to providing therapeutic interventions.
Due to the vast scope of forensic psychology, this discussion will focus on five prominent issues within the field: psychopathy, risk assessment, sexual offenders, insanity and competency evaluations, and child custody assessments. It is important to note that this selection is not exhaustive, and forensic psychology encompasses a broader range of topics.
Psychopathy: Deciphering Complex Traits
One of the significant areas of forensic psychology involves the assessment and understanding of psychopathy, a complex personality disorder characterized by traits such as manipulativeness and callousness. Forensic psychologists are tasked with evaluating individuals displaying psychopathic tendencies, contributing to legal decisions concerning sentencing, parole, and risk management. Research in this area aims to enhance the reliability of assessment tools used in forensic evaluations.
Risk Assessment: Predicting Future Behavior
The prediction of future behavior is a core component of forensic psychology, with a specific focus on evaluating the risk posed by individuals involved in legal proceedings. Forensic psychologists employ diverse methods to assess the likelihood of future criminal conduct, providing valuable insights for courts in determining parole, sentencing, or release. Ongoing research explores the effectiveness of risk assessment tools and their role in enhancing public safety.
Sexual Offenders: Balancing Treatment and Risk Management
Forensic psychologists actively engage in the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders, addressing issues related to risk assessment and intervention strategies. Their responsibilities encompass evaluating the risk of reoffending, delivering therapy, and collaborating on the development of risk management plans. Research in this field investigates the efficacy of treatment programs and the impact of interventions on reducing recidivism among sexual offenders.
Insanity and Competency: Legal Sanity Assessment
Forensic psychology plays a pivotal role in evaluating issues of legal sanity and competency. Forensic psychologists assess an individual’s mental state at the time of an offense and their capacity to stand trial. Ongoing research examines the reliability of assessment methods and their alignment with legal definitions of insanity and competency.
Child Custody Evaluations: Safeguarding Children’s Interests
Child custody evaluations involve forensic psychologists assessing the well-being of children during legal disputes over custody arrangements. Their role is to provide recommendations that prioritize the best interests of the child. Research in this area explores the psychological and emotional impact of custody decisions on children’s development.
In conclusion, forensic psychologists serve as valuable contributors to the legal system, providing specialized insights and expertise in diverse areas. While this discussion focuses on select issues within forensic psychology, it is essential to recognize the field’s comprehensive nature and its continuous evolution through ongoing research and practice.
Psychopathy is a term that has a long history but has gained significant attention in forensic psychology over the past three decades. It is now one of the most extensively researched topics within psychology. Despite this increased focus, there remains a considerable level of ambiguity surrounding the concept of psychopathy, even among psychologists.
Psychopathy can be understood as a psychological construct encompassing a combination of emotional, interpersonal, and behavioral traits that are closely associated with antisocial behavior (Hemphill & Hart, 2003). Read more about Psychopathy.
Risk assessment is closely related to psychopathy and constitutes a crucial aspect of forensic psychology. In the past, it was often referred to as violence prediction, as the primary concern for forensic psychologists was predicting whether a specific individual would exhibit violent behavior. However, it is important to note that risk assessment is not solely about making a binary decision regarding an individual’s potential for violence. Instead, it involves a comprehensive evaluation of various factors.
Risk assessment encompasses the identification of elements that may elevate the risk of violent behavior, factors that can mitigate this risk, the immediacy and severity of potential violence, and strategies for effectively managing and mitigating such violence. Read more about Risk Assessment.
Sex offenders have become a prominent subject of interest in risk assessment and various legislative and clinical efforts aimed at reducing sexual violence. A sexual offender is an individual who has engaged in a sexual act involving the use of force or threats against a nonconsenting person. The scope of sexual offenses encompasses a broad range of sexual acts perpetrated against diverse victims. In recent times, sexual offenders have garnered significant public attention and have been the focal point of legislative reforms. It is not uncommon to encounter news stories about sex offenders when watching television news or browsing national news sources online. Read more about Sexual Offenders.
Insanity and Competency
As previously explored, forensic psychology constitutes the intersection of clinical psychology and legal matters. Insanity and competency are two distinct legal issues that delve into specific mental health facets within the legal framework. Forensic psychologists are frequently called upon by the courts as experts to provide insights for legal decisions pertaining to both issues. It’s important to emphasize that their role primarily revolves around addressing the specific legal inquiries before the court rather than addressing purely psychological questions.
Although both insanity and competency involve mental health considerations within the legal context, they diverge significantly in their focus and are frequently misconstrued. Insanity inquiries concentrate on an individual’s mental state at the time they committed a crime. In contrast, competency assessments center on evaluating an individual’s current mental state in relation to their ability to participate effectively in legal proceedings. These two legal concepts serve distinct purposes and have different implications for legal proceedings. Read more about Insanity and Competency.
Child Custody Evaluations
Clinical forensic psychologists play a multifaceted role that extends beyond criminal cases, often engaging in less sensational yet crucial civil matters. One significant area of involvement is within child custody evaluations, a context less commonly associated with the intrigue of forensic psychology. However, as the divorce rate in the United States hovers around 50 percent, there has been a concurrent increase in demand for child custody assessments and evaluations. When separated or divorcing parents find themselves embroiled in custody disputes, the legal system may be called upon to adjudicate these conflicts. In response to this growing need, forensic psychologists have seen an upswing in their involvement, assisting the courts in navigating the complexities of child custody disputes (M. J. Ackerman & M. Ackerman, 1997). Read more about Child Custody Evaluations.
Education and Training for Forensic Psychology
Aspiring forensic psychologists often wonder about the path to entering this diverse field, which encompasses a wide range of responsibilities as previously discussed. The journey to become a forensic psychologist is as diverse as the field itself, reflecting the various roles one may assume. However, it is evident that embarking on this career typically necessitates pursuing graduate education.
Achieving success in these areas generally involves the attainment of a doctoral degree, either a PhD or PsyD, in psychology (Huss, 2001). While some states may permit individuals with a terminal master’s degree to engage in therapy and psychological evaluations, practicing independently in many forensic contexts usually requires a doctorate in forensic psychology. It is important to note that there are multiple pathways to becoming a practicing forensic psychologist. Read more about Clinical Forensic Psychology Education.
In this section, our aim was to dispel common misconceptions about the role of forensic psychologists while also shedding light on the field’s challenges, applications, and required training. Forensic psychology, although quite distinct from its portrayal in popular media, remains a captivating and intriguing field. Clinical forensic psychology offers a unique opportunity to bridge the realms of psychology and the legal domain, presenting practitioners with both the allure of this interdisciplinary approach and the challenges it entails.
While the scope of forensic psychology extends far beyond the topics covered in this paper, we delved into five significant areas: psychopathy, risk assessment, sexual offenders, insanity and competency evaluations, and civil matters, notably child custody evaluations. Clinical forensic psychologists often specialize in various combinations of these subjects. For students aspiring to pursue a career as practicing forensic psychologists, the path typically involves enrolling in a graduate program. The specific trajectory may vary, influenced by individual interests and abilities.
- Ackerman, M. J., & Ackerman, M. (1997). Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 137-145.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
- Bodholdt, R. H., Richards, H. R., & Gacano, C. B. (2000). Assessing psychopathy in adults: The psychopathy checklist-revised and screening version. In C. B. Gacano (Ed.), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practi-toner’s guide (pp. 55-86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Bonnie, R. J., & Grisso, T. (2000). Adjudicative competence and youthful offenders. In T. Grisso & R. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 73-103). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Callahan, L. A., Steadman, H. J., McGreevy, M. A., & Robbins, P. C. (1991). The volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas: An eight-state study. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 19, 331-338.
- Clifford, B. (2003). Psychology and law: A subdiscipline, and interdisciplinary collaboration or a project? In D. Carson & R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 605-624). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopath: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13, 171-188.
- Cornell, D. G., Warren, J., Hawk, G., Stafford, E., Oram, G., & Pine, D. (1996). Psychopathy in instrumental and reactive violent offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 783-790.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).
- Elbogen, E. B., Huss, M. T., Tomkins, A. J., & Scalora, M. J. (2005). Clinical decision making about psychopathy and violence risk assessment in public sector mental health settings. Psychological Services, 2, 133-141.
- Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the “unparalleled” measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 397-426.
- Goldstein, A. M. (2003). Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Goldstein, A. M. (2007). Forensic psychology: Emerging topics and expanding roles. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
- Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 25-54.
- Hare, R. D. (2001). Psychopaths and their nature: Some implications for understanding human predator violence. In A. Raine & J. Sanmartin (Eds.), Violence and psychopathy (pp. 5-34). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
- Hart, S. D. (2005). Advances in spousal violence risk assessment.
- Hart, S. D., Michie, C., Cooke, D. J. (in press). The precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the “margins of error” of group versus individual predictions of violence. British Journal of Psychiatry.
- Hemphill, J. F., & Hart, S. F. (2003). Forensic and clinical issues in the assessment of psychopathy. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology (pp. 87-107). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Hicks, S. J., & Sales, B. D. (2006). Criminal profiling: Developing an effective science and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Hoge, S. K., Bonnie, R. J., Poythress, N., & Monahan, J. (1992). Attorney-client decision-making in criminal cases: Client competence and participation as perceived by their attorneys. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10, 385-394.
- Huss, M. T. (2001). What is forensic psychology? It’s not Silence of the Lambs! Eye on Psi Chi, 5, 25-27.
- Huss, M. T. (in press). Doctoral programs in psychology and law. In B. Cutler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology and law. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Huss, M. T., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2000). Identification of the psychopathic batterer: The clinical, legal, and policy implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 403-422.
- Huss, M. T., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2006). Assessing the generalization of psychopathy in a clinical sample of domestic violence perpetrators. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 571-586.
- Litwack, T. R. (2001). Actuarial versus clinical assessments of dangerousness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 409-443.
- Marques, J. K., Wiederanders, M., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California’s Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79-107.
- Marshall, W. L., & Fernandez, Y. M. (2000). Phallometric testing with sexual offenders: Limits to its value. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 807-822.
- Melton, G. B., Huss, M. T., & Tomkins, A. J. (1999). Training in forensic psychology and law. In I. B. Weiner & A. K. Hess (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (2nd ed., pp. 700-720). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts: Handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. New York: Guilford Press.
- Nicholls, T. L., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Douglas, K. S. (2004). Assessing risk for violence among male and female civil psychiatric patients: The HCR-20, PCL:SV, and VSC. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22, 127-158.
- Nicholson, R. A., Barnard, G. W., Robbins, L., & Hankins, G. (1994). Predicting treatment outcome for incompetent defendants. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 22, 367-377.
- Nicholson, R. A., & Kugler, K. E. (1991). Competent and incompetent criminal defendants: a quantitative review of comparison research. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 355-370.
- Nicholson, R. A., & McNulty, J. L. (1992). Outcome of hospitalization for defendants found incompetent to stand trial. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10, 371-383.
- Ogloff, J. R. (1999). Ethical and legal contours of forensic psychology. In R. Roesch, S. D. Hart, & J. R. P. Ogloff (Eds.), Psychology and law: The state of the discipline (pp. 403-122). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
- Ogloff, J. R., & Finkelman, D. (1999). Psychology and law: An overview. In R. Roesch, S. D. Hart, & J. R. P. Ogloff (Eds.), Psychology and law: The state of the discipline (pp. 1-20). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
- Porter, S., Fairweather, D., Drugge, J., Herve, H., & Birt, A. (2000). Profiles of psychopathy in incarcerated sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 216-233.
- Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R, & Sewell, K. W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist—Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 3, 203-215.
- Stahl, P. M. (2002). Child custody evaluations. In B. Van Dorsten (Ed.), Forensic psychology: From classroom to courtroom (pp. 171-197). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
- Steadman, H. J., Monahan, J., Hartstone, E., Davis, S., & Robbins, P. (1982). Mentally disordered offenders: A national survey of patients and facilities. Law and Human Behavior, 6, 31-38.
- Steuerwald, B. L., & Kosson, D. S. (2000). Emotional experiences of the psychopath. In C. B. Gacano (Ed.), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 111-135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Sullivan, E. A., & Kosson, D. S. (2006). Ethnic and cultural variations in psychopathy. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 437-458). New York: Guilford Press.
- Torres, A. N., Boccaccini, M. T., & Miller, H. A. (2006). Perceptions of the validity and utility of criminal profiling among forensic psychologists and psychiatrists. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 37, 51-58.
- Van Dorsten, B. (2002). Forensic psychology: From classroom to courtroom. New York: Kluwer/Plenum. Verona, E., & Vitale, J. (2006). Psychopathy in women: Assessment, manifestations, and etiology. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 415-136). New York: Guilford Press.
- Walters, G. D. (2003). Predicting criminal justice outcomes with the psychopathy checklist and lifestyle criminality screening form: A meta-analytic comparison. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 89-102.
- Weiner, I. B., & Hess, A. K. (2006). The handbook of forensic psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Williamson, S., Hare, R. D., & Wong, S. (1987). Violence: Criminal psychopaths and their victims. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19, 454-462.
- Wikipedia (n.d.). Forensic psychology. Retrieved June 24, 2015, fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_psychology.