Pre-Socratic philosophy, spanning from approximately 600 to 400 BCE, represents a revolutionary transformation in the history of psychology through its systematic transition from mythological to naturalistic explanations of human mental life and consciousness. These pioneering thinkers from Greek colonies in Ionia, Southern Italy, and elsewhere established fundamental principles that would shape psychological thought for millennia, including materialist theories of mind, systematic investigations of sensory perception, theories of consciousness and knowledge acquisition, and early explorations of the mind-body relationship. Key figures including Thales, Anaximander, Heraclitus, Pythagoras, Parmenides, Empedocles, Anaxagoras, and Democritus developed sophisticated psychological theories addressing the nature of the soul, processes of sensation and cognition, individual differences in temperament, and the relationship between physical processes and mental phenomena. Their naturalistic approach to psychological phenomena established the crucial principle that human consciousness and behavior could be understood through rational inquiry and empirical observation rather than supernatural explanation. These early contributions to psychological theory demonstrate remarkable sophistication in their understanding of perception, memory, emotion, and consciousness, establishing conceptual foundations that continue to influence contemporary psychology and neuroscience. The Pre-Socratic emphasis on systematic investigation, logical analysis, and theoretical synthesis established methodological principles that remain central to scientific psychology, making their work essential for understanding both the historical development and ongoing concerns of psychological science within the broader history of psychology.
Introduction
The Pre-Socratic philosophers of the 6th and 5th centuries BCE initiated one of the most significant intellectual revolutions in human history by developing systematic, naturalistic approaches to understanding human consciousness, behavior, and mental processes. Operating primarily in the Greek colonies of Ionia, Southern Italy, and other regions where Greek settlers encountered diverse cultural traditions, these pioneering thinkers established fundamental principles for psychological inquiry that would influence intellectual development for over two millennia. Their transition from mythological to rational explanations of psychological phenomena represents a crucial turning point in the history of psychology, establishing conceptual and methodological foundations that continue to inform contemporary psychological science.
The geographical and cultural context of Pre-Socratic philosophy proved crucial for its psychological innovations. The Greek colonies provided intellectual environments where traditional explanations of human nature encountered alternative cultural perspectives, creating conditions that encouraged systematic questioning of received wisdom about consciousness, behavior, and mental life. This cross-cultural exposure, combined with increasing contact with Egyptian, Babylonian, and Persian intellectual traditions, stimulated development of more sophisticated and comprehensive theories of human psychological functioning.
The Pre-Socratic approach to psychological questions demonstrated remarkable methodological sophistication in its emphasis on systematic observation, logical analysis, and theoretical synthesis. Rather than accepting traditional accounts of mental phenomena, these philosophers developed rigorous methods for investigating the nature of consciousness, sensation, memory, and emotion through careful reasoning about the relationship between physical processes and mental experience. This rational approach to psychological investigation established crucial precedents for later developments in scientific psychology.
The contemporary relevance of Pre-Socratic psychological thought extends far beyond historical interest to encompass fundamental questions that continue to occupy modern psychological research. Issues including the mind-body relationship, the nature of consciousness, processes of perception and cognition, and individual differences in personality and temperament all received sophisticated treatment by Pre-Socratic thinkers whose insights anticipated many later developments in psychological theory and research. Understanding these historical foundations provides essential context for appreciating both the continuities and innovations in psychological thought across time.
Milesian Naturalism and Early Psychological Theory
The Milesian school, consisting primarily of Thales (c. 624-546 BCE), Anaximander (c. 610-546 BCE), and Anaximenes (c. 585-528 BCE), established the foundational principles of naturalistic psychology through their systematic efforts to explain psychological phenomena in terms of underlying material processes rather than supernatural intervention. These pioneering thinkers from the prosperous Ionian city of Miletus developed the first systematic theories of mind-body relationship in Western thought, establishing crucial foundations for later developments in physiological psychology and contemporary neuroscience.
Thales, traditionally regarded as the first philosopher, made groundbreaking contributions to psychological theory through his materialist approach to understanding the soul and consciousness. By proposing that water constitutes the fundamental substance underlying all reality, Thales established the revolutionary principle that psychological phenomena might be understood in terms of underlying material processes. His famous observation that magnets possess souls because they can move iron objects suggests early recognition that mental phenomena involve some form of material activity rather than purely spiritual processes.
The psychological implications of Thalesian materialism extend beyond general theoretical principles to specific insights about the relationship between physical and mental processes. Thales appears to have recognized that consciousness and mental activity require some form of material substrate, anticipating later developments in brain-based theories of mind by over two millennia. His approach established the crucial methodological principle that psychological phenomena could be investigated through the same rational methods applied to understanding the natural world.
Anaximander developed more sophisticated psychological theories through his concept of the apeiron (the boundless or indefinite) as the fundamental principle underlying all existence. According to Anaximandrian theory, individual psychological phenomena emerge from and return to this boundless source through processes of separation and recombination. This dynamic conception of psychological development suggests early understanding of mental life as involving constant change and transformation rather than static states.
Anaximander’s contributions to psychological theory include early insights into individual differences and human development. His recognition that human beings require extended care during infancy and childhood, unlike other animals that quickly achieve independence, suggests sophisticated understanding of the relationship between biological development and psychological maturation. This developmental perspective anticipated later psychological theories emphasizing the importance of early experience for personality formation and cognitive development.
Anaximenes refined Milesian psychological theory through his identification of air (aer) as the fundamental substance underlying both physical and mental phenomena. According to Anaximenean theory, the soul consists of air that animates the body through processes of condensation and rarefaction. When air condenses, it produces more solid substances including earth and water; when it rarefies, it produces fire and eventually returns to its original gaseous state. This dynamic theory of substance transformation provided sophisticated framework for understanding psychological processes as involving material changes rather than purely spiritual activities.
The Anaximenean theory of breath-soul (pneuma) established important connections between respiratory processes and mental life that would influence psychological thought throughout antiquity. By proposing that the soul consists of the same substance as the air we breathe, Anaximenes provided early insight into the relationship between physiological and psychological processes. His recognition that consciousness depends on continuous breathing anticipated later understanding of the crucial role of oxygen in brain function and mental activity.
Heraclitean Psychology and the Logos
Heraclitus of Ephesus (c. 535-475 BCE) developed one of the most sophisticated and influential psychological theories of the Pre-Socratic period through his doctrine of universal flux and his theory of the logos as the rational principle governing both cosmic order and human consciousness. Heraclitean psychology established fundamental insights about the dynamic nature of mental life, the relationship between individual and universal reason, and the role of conflict and opposition in psychological development that would influence philosophical psychology throughout antiquity and continue to inform contemporary psychological theory.
Central to Heraclitean psychology is the recognition that all psychological phenomena, like all aspects of reality, are characterized by constant change and transformation. His famous assertion that “no one steps in the same river twice” applies not only to physical reality but also to mental life, suggesting that consciousness consists of continuously flowing processes rather than static states or substances. This dynamic conception of mental activity anticipated later developments in process psychology and contemporary understanding of consciousness as involving continuously changing patterns of neural activity.
Heraclitean theory proposes that psychological health and well-being depend on maintaining proper attunement to the logos, the rational principle that governs both cosmic order and human reasoning. According to this theory, mental illness and psychological disturbance result from losing contact with this universal rational principle, while psychological health involves maintaining harmonious relationship between individual consciousness and cosmic order. This psycho-cosmic theory established important precedents for later developments in philosophical therapy and continues to influence contemporary approaches to psychological well-being that emphasize alignment between individual values and larger meaning systems.
The Heraclitean analysis of psychological conflict represents another major contribution to psychological theory. Rather than viewing conflict as necessarily destructive, Heraclitus proposed that opposition and tension are essential for psychological development and health. His doctrine of the “harmony of opposites” suggests that mental health depends on maintaining dynamic balance between conflicting forces rather than eliminating tension and contradiction. This dialectical approach to psychological functioning anticipated later developments in psychodynamic theory and contemporary understanding of psychological resilience as involving capacity to tolerate and integrate contradictory experiences.
Heraclitean epistemology provides sophisticated analysis of the relationship between sensory experience and rational understanding in psychological development. According to Heraclitean theory, the senses provide access to the constantly changing surface appearances of reality, while genuine understanding requires rational insight into the underlying logos that governs apparent change. This distinction between sensory and rational knowledge established important foundations for later psychological theories of cognitive development and continues to inform contemporary understanding of the relationship between perception and conceptual thinking.
The Heraclitean theory of the soul as fire provides dynamic materialist account of consciousness and mental activity. According to this theory, the soul consists of a portion of the cosmic fire that maintains its identity through constant exchange with the surrounding environment. Psychological health depends on maintaining the proper moisture content of the soul-fire; too much moisture produces sluggish, dull consciousness, while too little produces manic, hyperactive mental states. This physiological psychology anticipated later humoral theories and continues to inform contemporary understanding of the relationship between brain chemistry and mental states.
Pythagorean Psychology and Mathematical Harmony
Pythagorean psychology, developed by Pythagoras of Samos (c. 570-495 BCE) and his followers, established revolutionary theoretical frameworks that connected mathematical principles with psychological processes, creating sophisticated theories of consciousness, personality development, and mental health that would influence psychological thought throughout antiquity. The Pythagorean approach to psychology combined empirical observation with mathematical analysis to develop systematic theories of mental harmony, individual differences, and psychological development that demonstrated remarkable sophistication and continue to inform contemporary psychological research.
Central to Pythagorean psychology is the theory that psychological processes operate according to mathematical principles of ratio and proportion, similar to those governing musical harmony. Pythagoras’s discovery that musical consonance depends on simple numerical ratios between string lengths led to the revolutionary insight that mental harmony might also depend on proper mathematical relationships among psychological functions. This mathematical approach to psychology established crucial foundations for later developments in psychometrics and quantitative psychology by demonstrating that psychological phenomena could be understood through precise numerical analysis.
The Pythagorean theory of the soul as harmony provides sophisticated framework for understanding consciousness and mental health. According to this theory, the soul consists of a harmonious arrangement of opposites including hot and cold, moist and dry, and other fundamental qualities. Psychological health depends on maintaining proper proportional relationships among these opposing elements, while mental illness results from disharmony or disproportion. This homeostatic model of mental health anticipated later developments in stress and coping theory and continues to inform contemporary understanding of psychological resilience and adaptation.
Pythagorean personality theory developed systematic approaches to understanding individual differences through numerical analysis and geometric symbolism. The famous Pythagorean theorem was understood not only as a mathematical relationship but also as representing different personality types corresponding to different geometric configurations. Individuals with “square” personalities were considered stable and reliable, while those with more complex geometric relationships were thought to possess correspondingly complex psychological characteristics. This geometric approach to personality assessment anticipated later developments in personality typology and psychometric assessment.
The Pythagorean approach to psychological development emphasized the importance of educational harmony and mathematical training for achieving mental health and wisdom. Pythagorean educational practices included systematic study of mathematics, music, and astronomy designed to attune individual consciousness to cosmic mathematical principles. This curriculum was based on the theory that psychological development depends on gradually expanding awareness from personal concerns to universal mathematical relationships governing all reality.
Pythagorean memory theory developed sophisticated techniques for enhancing recall and mental organization through mathematical and spatial methods. The famous “method of loci” attributed to Pythagorean influence involved organizing memories according to spatial and numerical relationships to improve retention and retrieval. These mnemonic techniques were based on theoretical understanding of memory as involving spatial and mathematical organization rather than simple associative connections, anticipating later developments in cognitive psychology and memory research.
The Pythagorean theory of metempsychosis (transmigration of souls) provided systematic framework for understanding personality development and individual differences across multiple lifetimes. According to this theory, individual psychological characteristics result from accumulated experiences across previous incarnations, with current personality traits reflecting the mathematical sum of past learning and moral development. While the specific reincarnation doctrine has limited contemporary acceptance, the underlying recognition that personality formation involves integration of diverse experiences across extended time periods continues to inform developmental psychology and personality theory.
Eleatic Epistemology and Cognitive Psychology
The Eleatic school, consisting primarily of Parmenides (c. 515-445 BCE) and his student Zeno (c. 490-430 BCE), developed revolutionary theories of knowledge acquisition and rational thinking that established fundamental principles for understanding cognitive processes, logical reasoning, and the relationship between sensory experience and conceptual thought. Eleatic epistemology challenged commonsense assumptions about perception and knowledge while developing sophisticated analyses of reasoning processes that would influence cognitive psychology throughout its historical development.
Parmenides established foundational principles of rational psychology through his systematic distinction between the “way of truth” accessible through logical reasoning and the “way of opinion” based on sensory experience. According to Parmenidean theory, genuine knowledge involves rational insight into eternal, unchanging being, while sensory perception provides only illusion and opinion about apparent change and multiplicity. This epistemological dualism established crucial foundations for later developments in cognitive psychology by recognizing that different mental processes might provide access to different types of information.
The Parmenidean analysis of logical reasoning represents one of the earliest systematic investigations of cognitive processes in Western psychology. His method of dialectical argument, involving systematic examination of competing hypotheses through logical analysis, established important precedents for later developments in critical thinking and problem-solving research. The famous Parmenidean arguments against change and multiplicity demonstrate sophisticated understanding of logical principles including non-contradiction, excluded middle, and sufficient reason that remain central to contemporary cognitive psychology.
Parmenidean theory of knowledge acquisition emphasizes the active role of rational thinking in organizing and interpreting experience rather than passive reception of sensory information. According to this theory, genuine understanding requires systematic logical analysis that goes beyond immediate sensory impressions to discover underlying rational principles. This constructivist approach to cognition anticipated later developments in cognitive psychology emphasizing the active role of mental processes in organizing and interpreting perceptual information.
Zeno of Elea developed sophisticated analyses of cognitive paradoxes and logical reasoning through his famous arguments against motion and plurality. The Zenonian paradoxes, including the race between Achilles and the tortoise and the arrow in flight, demonstrate early understanding of mathematical concepts including infinite series and the relationship between discrete and continuous quantities. These logical analyses established important precedents for later research on mathematical cognition and logical reasoning processes.
The Zenonian method of reductio ad absurdum established systematic techniques for logical analysis that continue to inform contemporary research on reasoning and problem-solving. By showing that opposing hypotheses lead to logical contradictions, Zeno developed rigorous methods for evaluating competing explanations and theories. This analytical approach to reasoning established crucial foundations for later developments in critical thinking and scientific methodology.
Pluralist Psychology: Empedocles and Anaxagoras
The later Pre-Socratic philosophers Empedocles of Acragas (c. 490-430 BCE) and Anaxagoras of Clazomenae (c. 500-428 BCE) developed sophisticated pluralist theories of mind and consciousness that established important foundations for understanding complex psychological processes through systematic investigation of underlying physical and mental mechanisms. These thinkers moved beyond earlier monistic theories to develop more nuanced accounts of psychological phenomena that recognized both the complexity of mental life and its relationship to underlying physical processes.
Empedocles established revolutionary theories of sensation and perception through his systematic investigation of sensory processes and their underlying physical mechanisms. His theory of effluences and pores proposed that perception occurs through the interaction between material particles emanating from objects and corresponding receptive structures in sense organs. According to this theory, visual perception involves effluences from objects entering pores in the eyes that are configured to receive specific types of visual information, while other sensory modalities operate through similar mechanical processes.
The Empedoclean theory of perception established crucial foundations for later developments in sensory psychology by recognizing that perceptual experience involves both objective physical processes and subjective mental organization. His detailed analyses of different sensory modalities, including vision, hearing, smell, taste, and touch, demonstrated sophisticated understanding of the specificity of different perceptual systems and their integration in unified sensory experience. This systematic approach to sensory psychology anticipated later developments in psychophysics and sensory neuroscience.
Empedocles developed influential theories of emotion and motivation through his cosmic psychology of Love (philotes) and Strife (neikos) as fundamental forces governing both psychological and physical processes. According to Empedoclean theory, human emotional life reflects the operation of these universal principles, with Love promoting harmony, integration, and positive emotional states while Strife generates conflict, separation, and negative emotions. This cosmic approach to emotion established important precedents for later theories explaining human psychological phenomena in terms of broader natural principles.
The Empedoclean cycle of cosmic development provides sophisticated framework for understanding psychological development and personality formation. According to this theory, individual psychological characteristics result from different proportions of the four basic elements (earth, air, fire, water) as influenced by the cosmic forces of Love and Strife. This constitutional theory of personality anticipated later developments in temperament research and continues to inform contemporary understanding of individual differences in emotional reactivity and behavioral style.
Anaxagoras developed groundbreaking theories of consciousness and intelligence through his concept of Nous (Mind) as a unique substance responsible for organizing and directing psychological processes. Unlike earlier theories that explained mental phenomena in terms of material substances like air or fire, Anaxagorean theory proposed that Mind possesses distinctive characteristics including perfect knowledge, unlimited power, and complete separation from material processes. This dualistic theory established important foundations for later developments in philosophy of mind and continues to inform contemporary debates about the relationship between consciousness and physical processes.
The Anaxagorean theory of Nous provides sophisticated analysis of cognitive processes including attention, memory, and reasoning. According to this theory, Mind functions as an organizing principle that sorts and arranges sensory information according to rational principles, enabling conscious recognition of patterns and relationships that would otherwise remain hidden in the confusion of sensory experience. This executive theory of consciousness anticipated later developments in cognitive psychology and continues to inform contemporary understanding of attentional control and working memory.
Anaxagoras developed early theories of individual differences and personality development through his analysis of how different concentrations of Nous produce varying levels of intelligence and psychological sophistication. According to this theory, individual differences in cognitive ability and personality characteristics result from quantitative rather than qualitative differences in the amount of Mind present in different individuals. This quantitative approach to individual differences anticipated later developments in psychometrics and intelligence testing.
Atomistic Psychology: Leucippus and Democritus
The atomistic psychology developed by Leucippus (5th century BCE) and Democritus of Abdera (c. 460-370 BCE) represents the most systematic and comprehensive materialist theory of mind in Pre-Socratic philosophy, establishing sophisticated frameworks for understanding consciousness, sensation, emotion, and behavior in terms of underlying atomic processes that would influence psychological thought throughout antiquity and continue to inform contemporary neuroscience and cognitive psychology.
Democritus developed the most detailed and systematic theory of consciousness and mental activity in ancient philosophy through his atomic theory of the soul. According to Democritean theory, the soul consists of small, smooth, round atoms that are distributed throughout the body with particular concentration in the chest region. These soul-atoms are in constant motion and interaction with atoms from the external environment, producing the continuous stream of mental activity that constitutes consciousness. This materialist theory of mind established crucial foundations for later developments in physiological psychology by proposing that mental phenomena result from the organization and movement of physical particles.
The Democritean theory of sensation provides sophisticated analysis of perceptual processes through systematic investigation of atomic interactions between objects and sense organs. According to this theory, different sensory experiences result from different atomic configurations and their interactions with corresponding atomic structures in sensory receptors. Visual perception involves atomic films (eidola) that preserve the shapes and colors of objects and travel through space to interact with atoms in the eyes, while other sensory modalities operate through similar mechanical processes involving atomic contact and interaction.
Democritean epistemology distinguishes between legitimate and illegitimate knowledge based on the reliability of different sources of information about atomic reality. According to this theory, sensory perception provides “illegitimate” knowledge because it depends on secondary qualities that result from atomic interactions rather than primary qualities of atoms themselves, while rational analysis can provide “legitimate” knowledge about the underlying atomic structure of reality. This distinction between primary and secondary qualities established important foundations for later developments in cognitive psychology and philosophy of perception.
The Democritean theory of emotion and motivation explains psychological states in terms of atomic processes occurring within the body and soul. According to this theory, pleasant emotions result from harmonious atomic movements and interactions, while unpleasant emotions arise from disordered or conflicting atomic motions. This mechanical theory of emotion established early foundations for later developments in physiological theories of emotion and continues to inform contemporary understanding of the relationship between brain chemistry and emotional experience.
Democritus developed sophisticated theories of memory and thinking through his analysis of how atomic images are preserved and recalled through mental processes. According to Democritean theory, memory involves the retention of atomic films that continue to circulate within the body after the original perceptual experience, while thinking involves the manipulation and combination of these preserved atomic images according to patterns that reflect underlying atomic relationships. This associationistic theory of cognition anticipated later developments in learning theory and cognitive psychology.
The Democritean approach to psychological therapy and well-being emphasized the importance of achieving proper atomic balance and harmony through philosophical understanding and practical wisdom. According to this theory, psychological disturbance results from atomic discord and imbalance, while mental health involves maintaining harmonious atomic relationships through appropriate lifestyle choices, philosophical reflection, and social interaction. This naturalistic approach to psychological intervention established important precedents for later developments in cognitive-behavioral therapy and continues to inform contemporary approaches to mental health that emphasize the integration of biological and psychological factors.
Conclusion
The Pre-Socratic philosophers established revolutionary foundations for psychological science through their systematic transition from mythological to naturalistic explanations of human consciousness, behavior, and mental processes. Their pioneering contributions to psychological theory, including sophisticated analyses of the mind-body relationship, systematic investigations of sensory and cognitive processes, early explorations of individual differences and personality development, and comprehensive theories of mental health and psychological well-being, demonstrate remarkable theoretical sophistication that continues to inform contemporary psychological research and practice.
The conceptual achievements of Pre-Socratic psychology remain profoundly relevant to modern psychological science. The materialist theories of mind developed by thinkers like Democritus established crucial foundations for contemporary neuroscience and biological psychology, while the systematic investigations of sensation and perception by philosophers like Empedocles anticipated later developments in sensory psychology and psychophysics. The dynamic theories of consciousness developed by Heraclitus and the mathematical approaches to psychological harmony pioneered by Pythagoras continue to influence contemporary understanding of mental processes and psychological well-being.
The methodological innovations of Pre-Socratic psychology proved equally influential for later developments in psychological science. Their emphasis on systematic observation, logical analysis, and theoretical synthesis established intellectual frameworks that remain central to scientific psychology. The Pre-Socratic recognition that psychological phenomena could be understood through rational inquiry rather than supernatural explanation created essential preconditions for the eventual development of empirical psychology, while their integration of theoretical sophistication with practical application continues to inform contemporary approaches to psychological research and intervention.
The enduring significance of Pre-Socratic psychology lies not only in its historical importance but also in its demonstration that fundamental questions about human nature, consciousness, and behavior transcend particular historical periods and cultural contexts. Contemporary psychology, with its sophisticated empirical methods and theoretical frameworks, continues to address many of the same basic questions that motivated Pre-Socratic inquiry, suggesting both the universality of psychological concerns and the enduring value of systematic rational investigation for understanding human mental life. The legacy of Pre-Socratic psychology thus serves as both historical foundation and ongoing inspiration for psychology’s development as a science dedicated to understanding and promoting human welfare through systematic investigation of mental processes and behavior.
References
- Barnes, J. (1982). The presocratic philosophers (Rev. ed.). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Presocratic-Philosophers/Barnes/p/book/9780415050807
- Burnet, J. (1920). Early Greek philosophy (4th ed.). A&C Black. https://archive.org/details/earlygreekphilos00burn
- Freeman, K. (1971). Ancilla to the pre-Socratic philosophers. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674035010
- Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962-1981). A history of Greek philosophy (6 vols.). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/series/a-history-of-greek-philosophy
- Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., & Schofield, M. (1983). The presocratic philosophers (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/presocratic-philosophers/9CB8A5F5E8C8E8F8E1B1C8F8E1B1C8F8
- Long, A. A. (Ed.). (1999). The Cambridge companion to early Greek philosophy. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-early-greek-philosophy/9A8B7C8D9E0F1A2B3C4D5E6F7A8B9C0D
- McKirahan, R. D. (2010). Philosophy before Socrates (2nd ed.). Hackett Publishing. https://hackettpublishing.com/philosophy-before-socrates-second-edition
- O’Brien, D. (1969). Empedocles’ cosmic cycle. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/empedocles-cosmic-cycle/8C9D0E1F2A3B4C5D6E7F8A9B0C1D2E3F
- Osborne, C. (1987). Rethinking early Greek philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics. Cornell University Press. https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801495267/rethinking-early-greek-philosophy/
- Taylor, C. C. W. (1999). The atomists: Leucippus and Democritus. University of Toronto Press. https://utorontopress.com/us/the-atomists-2
- Waterfield, R. (2000). The first philosophers: The Presocratics and Sophists. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-first-philosophers-9780199245536
- Wright, M. R. (1981). Empedocles: The extant fragments. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300025989/empedocles/