Sexual discrimination in the workplace represents a persistent challenge in corporate ethics and remains a critical area of study within industrial-organizational psychology. This comprehensive review examines the multifaceted nature of sexual discrimination, encompassing both sexual harassment and gender-based discrimination that affects millions of workers globally. Recent research indicates that sexual harassment rates have remained largely unchanged over the past decade, with nearly half of LGBTQ employees and approximately 42% of women reporting experiences of workplace discrimination based on sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity. The article synthesizes contemporary findings on the legal frameworks governing sexual discrimination, psychological and organizational antecedents, consequences for individuals and organizations, and evidence-based interventions. Key findings reveal that sexual discrimination manifests through various forms including quid pro quo harassment, hostile work environments, and systemic gender bias in hiring, promotion, and compensation decisions. The review emphasizes the critical role of organizational climate, leadership commitment, and comprehensive prevention strategies in addressing these pervasive workplace issues. Contemporary research highlights the intersection of sexual discrimination with other forms of workplace bias and the evolving nature of harassment in digital work environments.
Introduction
Sexual discrimination in the workplace encompasses a broad spectrum of discriminatory behaviors and practices that target individuals based on their sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. This phenomenon represents one of the most significant challenges in contemporary organizational psychology and corporate ethics, affecting millions of workers across industries and organizational levels. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, sexual discrimination includes both direct harassment of a sexual nature and broader gender-based discrimination that creates unequal treatment in employment decisions.
The scope and persistence of sexual discrimination in modern workplaces demands urgent attention from researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. Despite decades of legal protections and organizational initiatives, recent studies reveal that sexual harassment remains as common today as it was five years ago, with women continuing to experience significant barriers to advancement. The #MeToo movement, which gained global prominence in 2017, brought unprecedented attention to these issues, catalyzing organizational reforms and sparking renewed research interest in understanding and preventing sexual discrimination.
Industrial-organizational psychology has emerged as a crucial discipline in addressing these workplace challenges through scientific research and evidence-based interventions. The field’s expertise in understanding human behavior in organizational contexts, measuring workplace climate, and designing effective training programs positions I-O psychologists at the forefront of efforts to create more equitable and inclusive work environments. Recent scholarship in this area emphasizes the need for comprehensive, theory-driven approaches to sexual harassment prevention that extend beyond traditional compliance training to address underlying organizational and cultural factors.
Contemporary research reveals that sexual discrimination manifests differently across various demographic groups and organizational contexts. LGBTQ employees face particularly high rates of discrimination, with transgender and nonbinary workers experiencing disproportionate levels of harassment and unfair treatment. Similarly, women with higher levels of education report experiencing discrimination at significantly higher rates than their less-educated counterparts, suggesting that professional advancement may paradoxically increase exposure to discriminatory behaviors.
The economic and human costs of sexual discrimination extend far beyond individual victims. Organizations face substantial legal liability, decreased productivity, increased turnover, and damaged reputation when these issues are not adequately addressed. Between fiscal years 2018 and 2021, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recovered nearly $300 million for individuals with sexual harassment claims, representing only a fraction of the total economic impact when unreported incidents and organizational costs are considered.
Legal Framework and Definitions
Historical Development of Sexual Discrimination Law
The legal foundation for addressing sexual discrimination in the United States rests primarily on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, though the interpretation and application of these protections have evolved significantly over the past six decades. The landmark Supreme Court decision in Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (1986) established that sexual harassment claims could be brought under Title VII as a form of sex discrimination, fundamentally changing how organizations and courts approached these issues.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) defines sexual harassment as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature when submission to such conduct explicitly or implicitly affects employment decisions or creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment. This definition encompasses two primary categories of discriminatory behavior that have become central to understanding workplace sexual discrimination.
The legal framework has continued to evolve through subsequent court decisions and regulatory guidance. Federal regulations specify that employers may be responsible for sexual harassment by non-employees when they know or should have known of the conduct and fail to take immediate corrective action. Recent interpretations have also expanded protections to include discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, though these applications remain subject to ongoing legal and political debate.
Types of Sexual Discrimination
Sexual discrimination in the workplace manifests through several distinct but often overlapping forms. Quid pro quo harassment occurs when employment decisions are based on an individual’s willingness to submit to sexual conduct, while hostile environment harassment involves conduct that creates an intimidating or offensive work environment. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for both legal compliance and effective prevention efforts.
Contemporary guidance from the EEOC emphasizes that harassment based on sex includes both conduct of a sexualized nature and non-sexual conduct based on sex, such as sex-based epithets or comments that women do not belong in certain roles. This broader interpretation recognizes that sexual discrimination often intersects with other forms of gender bias and stereotyping that limit opportunities and create hostile work environments.
The legal landscape has also evolved to recognize the particular challenges faced by sexual and gender minorities. Research demonstrates that LGBTQ employees experience discrimination at significantly higher rates than their heterosexual, cisgender counterparts, with transgender and nonbinary workers facing the most severe forms of harassment and unfair treatment. These findings have informed evolving legal interpretations and organizational policies aimed at protecting all employees regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.
Employer Liability and Responsibilities
Employers bear significant responsibility for preventing and addressing sexual discrimination, with automatic liability for harassment by supervisors that results in adverse employment actions such as termination or failure to promote. When supervisory harassment creates a hostile work environment without tangible employment consequences, employers can avoid liability only by demonstrating they took reasonable preventive and corrective measures and that the employee unreasonably failed to utilize available reporting mechanisms.
Prevention is identified as the best tool for eliminating sexual harassment, with employers encouraged to take proactive steps including clear communication of policies, appropriate training, and effective complaint procedures. The legal framework increasingly emphasizes organizational culture and climate as key factors in both preventing discrimination and establishing appropriate employer responses when incidents occur.
Modern legal standards also recognize the complexity of contemporary work environments, including remote work, social media interactions, and extended organizational networks. Recent EEOC guidance addresses harassment occurring in work-related contexts such as company-sponsored events or employer-provided housing, expanding the traditional boundaries of workplace discrimination. These developments reflect the evolving nature of work and the need for comprehensive approaches to employee protection.
Psychological and Organizational Antecedents
Individual-Level Risk Factors
Research in industrial-organizational psychology has identified numerous individual-level factors that predict both perpetration and victimization of sexual discrimination. Studies demonstrate that individuals higher in hostile sexism are more likely to engage in gender harassment and display lenient attitudes toward sexual harassment of women. These attitudinal factors often interact with organizational contexts to create environments where discrimination flourishes.
Position and power dynamics within organizations play crucial roles in determining vulnerability to discrimination, with both vertical supervisory relationships and horizontal peer relationships influencing the likelihood of discriminatory encounters. Paradoxically, research suggests that individuals in higher-status positions may face increased risk of certain forms of discrimination, challenging simplistic assumptions about power and vulnerability.
Age and career stage represent additional individual risk factors that intersect with gender and other demographic characteristics. Young women under 30 experience sexual harassment at rates equivalent to older women, indicating that the issue has not diminished across generational cohorts despite increased awareness and organizational attention. This persistence suggests that prevention efforts must address both immediate behavioral interventions and longer-term cultural change initiatives.
Organizational Culture and Climate
Organizational decision makers’ sexist attitudes and beliefs significantly predict discriminatory HR practices and gender harassment behaviors, highlighting the critical importance of leadership attitudes and organizational culture in shaping workplace experiences. Organizations with cultures that tolerate or implicitly endorse gender stereotypes create environments where sexual discrimination is more likely to occur and persist.
Research emphasizes the importance of organizational climate factors, including civility norms, diversity climate, and overall organizational support for equality, in predicting both the occurrence of sexual harassment and the effectiveness of prevention efforts. Organizations with strong climates for diversity and inclusion demonstrate lower rates of discrimination and more effective responses when incidents occur.
The role of bystanders and organizational response systems also significantly influences the prevalence and impact of sexual discrimination. Witnesses to sexual harassment experience vicarious trauma and negative psychological consequences, while their willingness to intervene depends on organizational norms, personal relationships, and perceived organizational support for reporting. Creating cultures that encourage and support bystander intervention represents a critical component of comprehensive prevention strategies.
Industry and Contextual Factors
Industry characteristics significantly influence the prevalence and forms of sexual discrimination, with hospitality, restaurant, and other customer-service industries showing particularly high rates of harassment due to power dynamics with customers and organizational structures that prioritize customer satisfaction. Understanding these industry-specific risk factors is essential for developing targeted prevention strategies.
Gender composition of work environments also influences discrimination patterns, though not always in predictable ways. While male-dominated environments often present higher risks for women, research indicates that organizational policies and practices can mediate these effects. The key factor appears to be not gender composition per se, but the presence of supportive organizational cultures and effective prevention mechanisms.
Remote work and digital environments present emerging challenges for understanding and preventing sexual discrimination. The increasing prevalence of virtual work arrangements, social media interactions, and digital communication platforms creates new venues for discriminatory behavior while complicating traditional approaches to prevention and intervention. Organizations must adapt their policies and practices to address these evolving workplace realities.
Consequences and Impact
Individual Consequences
The psychological and professional consequences of sexual discrimination extend far beyond the immediate harassment experience, creating long-term impacts on victims’ careers, health, and well-being. Research demonstrates that both direct victims and witnesses of sexual harassment experience negative psychological consequences including exhaustion, disengagement, and deterioration in mental health. These effects can persist long after the discriminatory behavior ends, creating lasting trauma that affects multiple life domains.
Career consequences represent another significant impact of sexual discrimination. Studies reveal that sexual harassment contributes to occupational sex segregation and pay inequality, as women may avoid certain roles or industries to escape harassment or leave positions after experiencing discrimination. These career disruptions have cumulative effects over time, contributing to persistent gender gaps in leadership representation and lifetime earnings.
For LGBTQ employees, the consequences of discrimination are particularly severe, with many engaging in “covering behaviors” such as hiding their identity or changing their appearance to avoid harassment. These adaptive strategies, while potentially protective in the short term, exact significant psychological costs and limit authentic self-expression and professional development.
Organizational Consequences
Organizations that fail to address sexual discrimination effectively face substantial direct and indirect costs. Legal expenses and settlement costs represent the most visible organizational consequences, with the EEOC recovering hundreds of millions of dollars annually for victims of sexual harassment. However, these direct legal costs represent only a fraction of the total organizational impact when productivity losses, turnover, and reputation damage are considered.
Employee turnover represents a significant hidden cost of sexual discrimination. Victims of harassment often leave their positions or organizations entirely, taking valuable knowledge and experience with them while requiring costly replacement and retraining efforts. Research indicates that many harassment incidents go unreported, suggesting that turnover related to sexual discrimination may be significantly underestimated by organizations.
The broader organizational climate effects of sexual discrimination extend beyond direct victims to affect all employees’ perceptions of fairness, safety, and organizational commitment. Organizations with reputations for tolerating discrimination may struggle to recruit and retain top talent, particularly among women and other underrepresented groups who may view such environments as career-limiting or personally threatening.
Societal and Economic Impact
The aggregate economic impact of sexual discrimination extends throughout society, affecting productivity, innovation, and economic growth. Research demonstrates that sexual harassment contributes to broader patterns of occupational segregation and wage inequality, perpetuating economic disparities between men and women. These macro-level effects compound over time, creating persistent barriers to gender equality in the labor market.
Innovation and organizational effectiveness may also suffer when sexual discrimination limits the full participation and advancement of talented individuals. Organizations that exclude or marginalize women and other groups miss opportunities to benefit from diverse perspectives and experiences that drive creativity and problem-solving. The cumulative effect across organizations and industries represents a significant loss of human capital and economic potential.
Public health implications represent another societal consequence of workplace sexual discrimination. The stress, trauma, and mental health impacts experienced by victims create demands on healthcare systems while reducing overall population well-being. Understanding and addressing these broader societal costs provides additional motivation for comprehensive prevention efforts and organizational reform.
Prevention and Intervention Strategies
Training and Education Programs
Contemporary approaches to sexual harassment training emphasize the need for comprehensive, theory-driven programs that address individual behavior change, organizational climate, and broader cultural factors. Traditional compliance-focused training programs, while legally required in many jurisdictions, have shown limited effectiveness in reducing discrimination or changing workplace cultures.
Effective training programs incorporate elements such as needs analysis, individual difference considerations, multiple learning modalities, and post-training reinforcement to maximize impact. Research suggests that one-time training sessions are insufficient to create lasting change, requiring instead ongoing reinforcement and integration with broader organizational development efforts.
Bystander intervention training represents a promising approach that extends beyond traditional victim-perpetrator frameworks to engage all employees in prevention efforts. These programs teach employees to recognize problematic behaviors, assess situations safely, and intervene effectively when appropriate. By distributing responsibility across the organization, bystander programs can create more comprehensive prevention networks.
Organizational Policy and Climate Interventions
Research emphasizes the importance of combining training efforts with broader organizational climate interventions that address underlying cultural factors and structural barriers to equality. Effective prevention requires comprehensive approaches that integrate policy development, leadership commitment, and culture change initiatives.
Clear policies and reporting mechanisms represent foundational elements of effective prevention systems. However, research indicates that only about half of women express confidence that their employers would effectively handle harassment complaints, suggesting that policy implementation and organizational response quality are as important as policy content.
Emerging approaches emphasize looking beyond training to address structural and systemic factors that contribute to discrimination. These interventions may include bias reduction in hiring and promotion processes, leadership development programs focused on inclusive behaviors, and accountability systems that tie manager performance to diversity and inclusion outcomes.
Technology and Innovation in Prevention
Digital platforms and artificial intelligence offer new opportunities for preventing and detecting sexual discrimination. Automated monitoring systems can identify patterns of problematic communication or behavior that might otherwise go unnoticed, while anonymous reporting platforms can reduce barriers to disclosure for victims and witnesses.
Virtual reality training programs represent another technological innovation that may enhance the effectiveness of harassment prevention efforts. These immersive experiences can provide realistic scenarios for practicing intervention skills while allowing participants to experience different perspectives and understand the impact of discriminatory behavior more viscerally than traditional training methods.
However, technology-based solutions also present new challenges and ethical considerations. Privacy concerns, the potential for false positives in automated monitoring systems, and the risk of creating surveillance cultures require careful consideration in designing and implementing technological prevention tools.
Industry-Specific Approaches
Recognition that sexual discrimination manifests differently across industries has led to increased interest in tailored prevention approaches that address specific contextual factors and risk profiles. Industries with high customer interaction, significant power differentials, or traditionally male-dominated cultures may require specialized intervention strategies.
The hospitality and restaurant industries, which show particularly high rates of customer-initiated harassment, benefit from approaches that address customer behavior management, employee empowerment, and organizational support systems. Similarly, industries with significant power differentials, such as entertainment or academia, require interventions that address structural power imbalances and create multiple reporting pathways.
Professional service industries face different challenges related to client relationships, travel requirements, and informal networking events that may create opportunities for discrimination. Prevention efforts in these contexts must balance professional relationship building with clear boundaries and appropriate oversight mechanisms.
Contemporary Issues and Emerging Trends
Intersection with Technology and Remote Work
The rapid expansion of remote and hybrid work arrangements, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has created new contexts for sexual discrimination while complicating traditional prevention approaches. Digital harassment through video calls, messaging platforms, and social media represents an emerging challenge that organizations are still learning to address effectively.
Virtual work environments present unique challenges for bystander intervention and supervisor oversight, as traditional social cues and informal monitoring mechanisms may be less effective in digital spaces. Organizations must develop new approaches to creating inclusive virtual cultures and addressing discriminatory behavior in distributed work environments.
The blurring of professional and personal boundaries in remote work settings also complicates traditional approaches to defining workplace discrimination. Social media interactions, home-based video calls, and informal digital communications create gray areas that require updated policies and training approaches.
Intersectionality and Multiple Forms of Discrimination
Contemporary research increasingly recognizes that sexual discrimination often intersects with other forms of bias based on race, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, and other characteristics. These intersectional experiences create unique challenges that may not be fully captured by traditional single-axis approaches to discrimination prevention.
Women of different racial, ethnic, educational, and political backgrounds report varying experiences with sexual discrimination, indicating the need for more nuanced understanding of how multiple identities shape workplace experiences. Prevention programs must account for these diverse experiences while avoiding overgeneralization or tokenistic approaches.
The experiences of transgender and nonbinary employees represent a particularly complex intersection of sexual and gender discrimination. Recent legal guidance recognizes the unique challenges faced by transgender employees, including intentional misgendering and harassment based on gender identity, requiring specialized training and support mechanisms.
Generational and Cultural Shifts
Despite increased awareness and legal protections, research indicates that young women experience sexual harassment at rates similar to older women, suggesting that generational change alone is insufficient to eliminate these problems. However, younger employees may have different expectations for organizational response and different preferences for prevention approaches.
The #MeToo movement and increased social media activism have changed cultural conversations about sexual discrimination, creating both opportunities and challenges for organizations. Research suggests that increased awareness has helped some individuals recognize and name their experiences while also creating organizational pressure for more effective prevention and response.
Global organizations face additional challenges in addressing sexual discrimination across different cultural contexts with varying legal frameworks, cultural norms, and expectations around gender roles and workplace behavior. Developing culturally sensitive prevention approaches while maintaining consistent organizational standards requires careful balance and ongoing adaptation.
Future Directions and Research Needs
Methodological Advancements
Future research in sexual discrimination would benefit from methodological innovations that better capture the complexity and dynamic nature of these workplace phenomena. Longitudinal studies that track individuals and organizations over time could provide crucial insights into the development and persistence of discriminatory cultures while evaluating the long-term effectiveness of intervention efforts.
Research increasingly recognizes the need for more sophisticated approaches that consider multiple axes of inequality simultaneously rather than focusing on single dimensions of discrimination. Mixed-methods approaches that combine quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews and observational studies may provide richer understanding of how discrimination manifests and persists in organizational contexts.
Digital trace data and computational methods offer new opportunities for studying sexual discrimination patterns at scale while preserving participant privacy. Anonymous organizational surveys combined with communication pattern analysis could reveal subtle forms of exclusion and bias that might not be captured through traditional self-report methods.
Intervention Development and Evaluation
Industrial-organizational psychologists are uniquely positioned to contribute to the development and evaluation of evidence-based interventions for sexual discrimination prevention. Future research should focus on identifying the specific mechanisms through which different interventions create change and the contextual factors that moderate their effectiveness.
Randomized controlled trials of prevention programs, while challenging to implement in organizational settings, could provide crucial evidence about the relative effectiveness of different approaches. Natural experiments created by policy changes or organizational initiatives also offer opportunities to evaluate intervention impacts with greater scientific rigor.
The development of better outcome measures represents another critical research need. Traditional measures of discrimination incidence may miss subtle forms of bias while failing to capture positive indicators of inclusive climate and culture. Developing comprehensive measurement approaches that assess both negative and positive aspects of workplace gender relations could improve both research and practice.
Integration with Broader Organizational Science
Sexual discrimination research would benefit from greater integration with broader organizational science literatures on topics such as leadership development, team dynamics, organizational change, and employee well-being. These connections could provide theoretical frameworks for understanding discrimination while identifying leverage points for intervention.
The relationship between sexual discrimination and organizational performance represents an important area for future research. While the costs of discrimination are increasingly recognized, more sophisticated analyses of the performance benefits of prevention could provide compelling business cases for organizational investment in these efforts.
Climate change, technological disruption, and other macro-level trends are reshaping work arrangements and organizational structures in ways that may influence sexual discrimination patterns. Research examining these broader contextual influences could help organizations anticipate and prepare for emerging challenges while adapting prevention strategies to changing workplace realities.
Conclusion
Sexual discrimination remains a persistent and complex challenge in contemporary workplaces, requiring comprehensive approaches that integrate legal compliance, psychological understanding, and organizational development principles. Despite decades of legal protections and organizational initiatives, recent research demonstrates that sexual harassment and discrimination continue to affect millions of workers at rates that have shown little improvement over the past decade. This persistence underscores the need for more sophisticated understanding of the factors that create and maintain discriminatory workplace cultures.
The evidence reviewed in this article demonstrates that effective prevention of sexual discrimination requires addressing multiple levels of analysis simultaneously. Individual-level interventions such as training and education programs, while necessary, are insufficient when implemented in isolation from broader organizational culture change efforts. Research consistently indicates that the most effective approaches combine skill-building interventions with structural changes that address underlying power dynamics, organizational policies, and leadership accountability systems.
Industrial-organizational psychology has emerged as a critical discipline in advancing both scientific understanding and practical solutions to sexual discrimination. The field’s expertise in measurement, intervention design, and organizational change processes positions I-O psychologists to make significant contributions to prevention efforts. However, realizing this potential requires greater integration of sexual discrimination prevention with broader organizational science theories and methods.
Contemporary trends including remote work, digital communication technologies, and increased recognition of intersectional identities create both new challenges and new opportunities for addressing sexual discrimination. Organizations must adapt their prevention approaches to address virtual harassment, support employees with multiple marginalized identities, and navigate changing cultural expectations around workplace equality. The #MeToo movement and similar social justice initiatives have created momentum for organizational change while raising expectations for more effective and comprehensive prevention efforts.
Future research and practice in this area should prioritize several key directions. First, longitudinal studies examining the development and persistence of discriminatory cultures could provide crucial insights for prevention efforts. Second, more rigorous evaluation of intervention programs using experimental and quasi-experimental designs could identify the most effective approaches while revealing the mechanisms through which change occurs. Third, greater attention to intersectionality and the unique experiences of different demographic groups could inform more inclusive and effective prevention strategies.
The economic and human costs of sexual discrimination extend far beyond individual victims to affect organizational performance, industry competitiveness, and societal well-being. Research demonstrates that sexual harassment contributes to occupational segregation and wage inequality, perpetuating broader patterns of economic disadvantage that limit human capital development and economic growth. Addressing these challenges requires sustained commitment from organizations, policymakers, researchers, and society as a whole.
Organizations seeking to create more equitable and inclusive workplaces must move beyond compliance-focused approaches to embrace comprehensive prevention strategies that address underlying cultural and structural factors. This includes developing more sophisticated measurement systems, implementing evidence-based interventions, creating accountable leadership structures, and fostering organizational cultures that actively promote equality and respect. The goal is not merely to eliminate discriminatory behavior but to create workplaces where all individuals can contribute their full potential without fear of harassment or bias.
As the nature of work continues to evolve, so too must approaches to preventing sexual discrimination. The integration of technology, changing workforce demographics, and shifting cultural norms require adaptive and innovative solutions. Industrial-organizational psychology, with its scientific approach to understanding human behavior in organizational contexts, is uniquely positioned to lead these efforts. However, success will require collaboration across disciplines, stakeholder groups, and organizational levels to create the comprehensive changes necessary to eliminate sexual discrimination from contemporary workplaces.
References
- American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Author.
- Burke, T. (2017). The MeToo movement: A case study of social media activism and social change. Journal of Social Media and Society, 15(3), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117690920
- Center for American Progress. (2024). Discrimination and barriers to well-being: The state of the LGBTQI+ community in 2022. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/discrimination-and-barriers-to-well-being-the-state-of-the-lgbtqi-community-in-2022/
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2024). Enforcement guidance on harassment in the workplace. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/enforcement-guidance-harassment-workplace
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2024). Fact sheet: Sexual harassment discrimination. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/fact-sheet-sexual-harassment-discrimination
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2024). Sexual harassment in our nation’s workplaces. https://www.eeoc.gov/data/sexual-harassment-our-nations-workplaces
- Equal Rights Advocates. (2025). Sexual harassment: Know your rights. https://www.equalrights.org/issue/economic-workplace-equality/sexual-harassment/
- FindLaw. (2017). Title VII and sexual harassment claims. https://corporate.findlaw.com/human-resources/title-vii-and-sexual-harassment-claims.html
- Gutworth, M. B., & Howard, M. C. (2019). Improving sexual harassment training effectiveness with climate interventions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 68-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.11
- Krivkovich, A., Field, E., Yee, L., & McConnell, M. (2024). Women in the workplace 2024: The 10th-anniversary report. McKinsey & Company and LeanIn.Org. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace
- Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). 29 CFR § 1604.11 – Sexual harassment. Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/1604.11
- Madera, J. M., Lee, L., & Dawson, M. (2019). Sexual harassment and sexual assault training: Consider the industry. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 96-99. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.15
- Medeiros, K., & Griffith, J. (2019). #Ustoo: How I-O psychologists can extend the conversation on sexual harassment and sexual assault through workplace training. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.155
- Pew Research Center. (2024). Gender discrimination comes in many forms for today’s working women. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/12/14/gender-discrimination-comes-in-many-forms-for-todays-working-women/
- Roscigno, V. J. (2019). Discrimination, sexual harassment, and the impact of workplace power. Socius, 5, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119853894
- Rudolph, C. W., Allan, B., Clark, M., Hertel, G., Hirschi, A., Kunze, F., Shockley, K., Shoss, M., Sonnentag, S., & Zacher, H. (2023). Gender inequalities in the workplace: A holistic review of organizational processes and practices. Human Resource Management Review, 33(2), Article 100933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100933
- Walsh, B. M., & Magley, V. J. (2019). Don’t forget the role of civility interventions in workplace sexual harassment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.12
- Williams Institute. (2025). LGBTQ people’s experiences of workplace discrimination and harassment. UCLA School of Law. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/lgbt-workplace-discrimination/
- Workplace Fairness. (n.d.). Sexual harassment – Legal standards. https://www.workplacefairness.org/sexual-harassment-legal-rights/
- Zenger, J., Alper, A. B., & Del Donno, C. (2022). Sexual harassment at work: Scoping review of reviews. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), Article 4602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084602