Basking in Reflected Glory (BIRGing) represents a fundamental phenomenon in social psychology that describes individuals’ tendency to enhance their self-esteem and social identity by associating themselves with successful others or groups. This important concept in social cognition examines how people strategically manage their public image by emphasizing connections to high-status or successful entities while distancing themselves from failures or negative associations. Originally identified and systematically studied by Robert Cialdini and his colleagues in the 1970s, BIRGing has become a central concept for understanding impression management, social identity processes, and self-enhancement strategies. The phenomenon is most commonly observed in sports contexts, where fans increase their public identification with winning teams while decreasing identification with losing teams, but extends to numerous other domains including academic institutions, organizations, and personal relationships. Research has demonstrated that BIRGing serves important psychological functions including self-esteem maintenance, social status enhancement, and identity protection. The concept is closely related to its counterpart, Cutting Off Reflected Failure (CORFing), which describes the tendency to distance oneself from unsuccessful associations. Understanding BIRGing has important implications for group dynamics, organizational behavior, marketing strategies, and social identity management across various contexts where individuals seek to maintain positive self-concepts through strategic association with successful others.
Introduction
The human need to maintain a positive self-concept and favorable social identity has been recognized as one of the most fundamental motivations driving social behavior. Within the broad framework of social psychology, researchers have identified numerous strategies that individuals employ to enhance their self-esteem and manage their public image. Among these strategies, the phenomenon of Basking in Reflected Glory stands out as a particularly pervasive and psychologically significant process that illustrates how social cognition operates in the service of self-enhancement.
Basking in Reflected Glory represents a sophisticated form of impression management where individuals strategically associate themselves with successful others or groups to enhance their own perceived status and self-worth. This phenomenon demonstrates the complex ways in which people navigate their social environments, seeking opportunities to affiliate with success while avoiding associations that might diminish their social standing.
The systematic study of BIRGing emerged from broader research traditions in social psychology, including work on social identity theory, self-enhancement processes, and impression management. This research revealed that individuals are remarkably strategic in their social affiliations, consistently showing patterns of increased association with success and decreased association with failure across diverse contexts and situations.
The importance of understanding BIRGing extends beyond academic interest to practical applications in areas such as organizational behavior, marketing, sports psychology, and interpersonal relationships. By understanding how and why people engage in reflected glory behaviors, we can better predict and influence social behavior in various contexts where group identification and social status are relevant factors.
The study of BIRGing also contributes to broader theoretical understanding of how social cognition operates in real-world contexts, revealing the adaptive functions of seemingly superficial social behaviors and demonstrating the sophisticated psychological processes underlying everyday social interactions.
Historical Development and Research Origins
Early Observations and Theoretical Context
The systematic study of basking in reflected glory emerged from earlier observations about human tendencies to associate with success and distance themselves from failure. While the specific terminology was developed in the 1970s, the underlying psychological processes had been noted by earlier researchers interested in social identity and group behavior.
Leon Festinger’s social comparison theory provided important theoretical foundations for understanding BIRGing by explaining how individuals use social comparisons to evaluate themselves and maintain positive self-concepts. The theory’s emphasis on strategic comparison selection helped explain why people might seek associations with successful others.
Social identity theory, developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner, contributed crucial insights about how group memberships contribute to individual identity and self-esteem. This theoretical framework helped explain why associating with successful groups could enhance individual self-worth through the mechanism of social identification.
Erving Goffman’s work on impression management and self-presentation provided additional theoretical context for understanding BIRGing as a strategic social behavior designed to manage others’ impressions and maintain favorable social identity. His analysis of “face” and social performance illuminated the strategic aspects of social association.
Early research on sports fan behavior provided some of the first systematic observations of what would later be termed BIRGing, with researchers noting that fans showed increased identification with winning teams and decreased identification with losing teams.
Cialdini’s Foundational Research
Robert Cialdini and his colleagues conducted the foundational research that established BIRGing as a systematic psychological phenomenon and developed the theoretical framework that continues to guide research in this area.
Cialdini’s initial studies in the 1970s examined university students’ tendency to wear school-affiliated clothing following football victories versus defeats. These studies revealed consistent patterns of increased school identification following success and decreased identification following failure.
The development of operational definitions and measurement approaches for BIRGing enabled systematic empirical research on the phenomenon. Cialdini’s team developed methods for assessing both behavioral and linguistic indicators of reflected glory behaviors.
Follow-up studies by Cialdini and colleagues extended findings to other contexts and populations, demonstrating the generalizability of BIRGing across different types of success, different populations, and different measurement approaches.
The theoretical integration of BIRGing with broader principles of social psychology, particularly self-enhancement and impression management theories, helped establish the phenomenon’s theoretical significance and generated predictions for future research.
Expansion and Replication
Following Cialdini’s foundational work, numerous researchers expanded the study of BIRGing to different contexts, populations, and theoretical questions, establishing the phenomenon’s robustness and theoretical importance.
Replication studies across different universities, sports teams, and cultural contexts confirmed the basic BIRGing effect while also revealing interesting variations in its magnitude and expression across different populations and situations.
Extension studies examined BIRGing in non-sports contexts, including academic achievements, organizational successes, and personal relationships, demonstrating the phenomenon’s broad applicability across diverse social domains.
Experimental studies began examining the causal mechanisms underlying BIRGing, manipulating factors such as self-esteem threat, public versus private settings, and individual differences to better understand when and why the phenomenon occurs.
Cross-cultural research began examining whether BIRGing patterns varied across different cultural contexts, contributing to understanding of the phenomenon’s universality versus cultural specificity.
Theoretical Mechanisms and Psychological Processes
Self-Enhancement and Esteem Maintenance
BIRGing serves important psychological functions related to self-enhancement and esteem maintenance, helping individuals maintain positive self-concepts in the face of threats or challenges to their identity.
The self-enhancement function of BIRGing operates by allowing individuals to claim partial credit for others’ successes through their associative connections, thereby boosting their own perceived competence and worth. This process can help maintain self-esteem even when individuals have not personally achieved success.
Research has shown that BIRGing is more pronounced when individuals have experienced recent threats to their self-esteem or when their personal achievements are limited, suggesting that the behavior serves a compensatory function for self-worth concerns.
The esteem maintenance function is particularly evident in studies showing that individuals with lower self-esteem or those who have recently experienced failure show stronger BIRGing tendencies, suggesting that the behavior helps restore threatened self-worth.
Neuroimaging research has provided some evidence for the neural mechanisms underlying self-enhancement through association, showing activation in reward-related brain regions when individuals are connected to successful others or groups.
Social Identity and Group Membership
Social identity theory provides crucial insights into how BIRGing operates through the mechanism of group identification and the human need to belong to valued social groups.
BIRGing can enhance social identity by allowing individuals to claim membership in successful groups, thereby benefiting from the positive characteristics and achievements associated with those groups. This process operates even when the connection to the successful group is tenuous or indirect.
The social identity function of BIRGing is particularly evident in research on sports fans, where individuals derive identity and self-worth from their team’s successes even though they have no direct role in achieving those successes.
Research has shown that BIRGing is stronger when group membership is more central to individual identity and when the group’s success is more relevant to important identity dimensions, suggesting that the behavior serves to protect and enhance valued aspects of identity.
The temporal aspects of social identity through BIRGing reveal that individuals can strategically adjust their level of identification with groups based on current performance, maintaining flexible group memberships that maximize identity benefits.
Impression Management and Social Status
BIRGing serves important impression management functions by helping individuals present favorable images to others and maintain or enhance their perceived social status within their communities.
The impression management function operates by signaling to others that the individual has connections to successful entities, which can enhance others’ perceptions of the individual’s competence, status, and social connections.
Research has demonstrated that BIRGing behaviors are more pronounced in public versus private settings, suggesting that the behavior is partially motivated by concerns about others’ impressions rather than purely by self-enhancement needs.
The social status function of BIRGing is evident in studies showing that individuals use associations with high-status others or groups to elevate their own perceived status, particularly in contexts where status hierarchies are salient and important.
Strategic timing of BIRGing behaviors reveals sophisticated impression management processes, with individuals more likely to publicize their associations with successful others when those associations are most likely to enhance their social standing.
Cognitive and Motivational Factors
The cognitive and motivational processes underlying BIRGing reveal the sophisticated psychological mechanisms that drive this seemingly simple social behavior.
Cognitive accessibility plays a role in BIRGing, with successful associations becoming more salient and available in memory, making them more likely to be mentioned or displayed in social interactions.
Motivational factors including need for affiliation, achievement motivation, and status concerns influence the strength and expression of BIRGing behaviors across individuals and situations.
Attention and memory biases contribute to BIRGing by making successful associations more memorable and attention-grabbing compared to neutral or negative associations, leading to selective recall and reporting of positive connections.
The role of causal attribution in BIRGing reveals how individuals may claim greater connection to successes than to failures, adjusting their perceived causal involvement based on outcomes rather than actual contribution.
Empirical Research and Key Findings
Classic Studies and Foundational Evidence
The empirical foundation for BIRGing research was established through a series of classic studies that demonstrated the phenomenon’s existence and explored its basic characteristics and boundary conditions.
Cialdini et al.’s (1976) foundational study examined clothing choices among university students following football games, finding that students were significantly more likely to wear school-affiliated apparel following victories than following defeats. This study established the basic BIRGing effect and introduced the theoretical framework.
Follow-up studies examined linguistic indicators of BIRGing, showing that individuals were more likely to use “we” versus “they” when describing their team’s victories versus defeats. These studies revealed that BIRGing operates at multiple levels including both behavioral and linguistic indicators.
Replication studies across multiple universities and sports contexts confirmed the reliability and generalizability of the basic BIRGing effect, establishing it as a robust psychological phenomenon rather than an isolated finding.
Experimental studies began manipulating factors that might influence BIRGing, including self-esteem threats, public versus private conditions, and individual difference variables, providing evidence for the proposed underlying mechanisms.
Individual Differences and Moderating Factors
Research has identified numerous individual difference variables that influence the strength and expression of BIRGing behaviors, contributing to understanding of when and for whom the phenomenon is most pronounced.
Self-esteem differences reveal that individuals with lower baseline self-esteem show stronger BIRGing tendencies, particularly following threats to self-worth, suggesting that the behavior serves a compensatory function for self-esteem concerns.
Narcissistic personality traits are associated with stronger BIRGing behaviors, reflecting the enhanced need for positive self-regard and status enhancement that characterizes narcissistic individuals.
Social anxiety and impression management concerns moderate BIRGing behaviors, with socially anxious individuals showing stronger reflected glory behaviors in contexts where social evaluation is salient.
Cultural background influences BIRGing patterns, with collectivistic cultures showing different patterns of group identification and association compared to individualistic cultures, though the basic phenomenon appears across cultural contexts.
Age and developmental factors reveal that BIRGing behaviors are present across the lifespan but may be expressed differently at different developmental stages, with adolescents showing particularly strong patterns related to identity development needs.
Situational and Contextual Factors
Research has identified numerous situational and contextual factors that influence the occurrence and strength of BIRGing behaviors, providing insights into the conditions that promote or inhibit the phenomenon.
Public versus private contexts significantly influence BIRGing, with stronger effects observed when behavior is public and visible to others, supporting the impression management function of the behavior.
The magnitude and importance of success influence BIRGing strength, with more impressive or significant achievements leading to stronger reflected glory behaviors than minor or routine successes.
Temporal factors reveal that BIRGing effects are strongest immediately following success but may diminish over time, suggesting that the behavior serves immediate self-enhancement and impression management needs.
Competition and threat contexts can enhance BIRGing by making social comparison and status concerns more salient, leading to stronger identification with successful associations.
Group size and exclusivity influence BIRGing patterns, with associations to smaller, more exclusive successful groups sometimes producing stronger effects than connections to large, inclusive successful groups.
Neurobiological and Physiological Evidence
Recent research has begun examining the neurobiological and physiological correlates of BIRGing, providing insights into the brain mechanisms underlying this social behavior.
Neuroimaging studies have shown activation in reward-related brain regions when individuals contemplate their connections to successful others, suggesting that BIRGing may trigger similar neural reward processes as personal achievement.
Hormonal research has examined testosterone and cortisol responses to team victories and defeats, finding physiological evidence for vicarious success and failure experiences that parallel the psychological BIRGing phenomenon.
Psychophysiological studies have measured autonomic nervous system responses during BIRGing situations, revealing arousal patterns consistent with the emotional investment in others’ outcomes that underlies reflected glory behaviors.
Brain imaging during social comparison tasks has revealed neural networks involved in self-evaluation and social comparison that may underlie the cognitive processes supporting BIRGing behaviors.
Related Phenomena and Theoretical Extensions
Cutting Off Reflected Failure (CORFing)
The complementary phenomenon of Cutting Off Reflected Failure (CORFing) describes individuals’ tendency to distance themselves from unsuccessful associations, providing the opposite behavioral pattern to BIRGing.
CORFing behaviors include decreased public identification with unsuccessful others or groups, reduced mention of failed associations, and strategic distancing from negative outcomes associated with connected entities.
Research has shown that CORFing and BIRGing often operate simultaneously, with individuals increasing identification with successful associations while decreasing identification with unsuccessful ones, suggesting sophisticated impression management strategies.
The asymmetry between BIRGing and CORFing reveals that people may be more motivated to avoid negative associations than to claim positive ones, reflecting broader patterns of loss aversion and negativity bias in social cognition.
Temporal patterns of CORFing show that distancing from failure may occur more quickly than embracing success, suggesting different psychological processes and motivations underlying the two phenomena.
Blasting and Other Identity Management Strategies
Blasting represents another related phenomenon where individuals actively criticize or derogate competitors or rivals of their associated successful groups, serving to enhance the relative standing of their own associations.
Blasting behaviors can include criticizing opposing teams, disparaging competitors’ achievements, or highlighting the failures and shortcomings of rivals, all serving to enhance the perceived value of one’s own associations.
Research on blasting reveals that it often co-occurs with BIRGing, suggesting that individuals employ multiple strategies simultaneously to enhance their reflected glory and protect their social identity.
The relationship between blasting and BIRGing varies across individuals and contexts, with some people showing stronger tendencies toward one strategy versus the other based on personality factors and situational demands.
Other identity management strategies related to BIRGing include selective memory for positive associations, strategic timing of association claims, and flexible adjustment of connection strength based on current performance.
Vicarious Achievement and Borrowed Success
Vicarious achievement represents a broader category of phenomena that includes BIRGing but extends to other ways individuals derive satisfaction and self-enhancement from others’ successes.
Research on vicarious achievement has examined how parents derive satisfaction from children’s successes, how mentors benefit from protégés’ achievements, and how community members feel pride in local heroes’ accomplishments.
The psychological mechanisms underlying vicarious achievement include empathy, identification, and social connection processes that allow individuals to experience positive emotions from others’ positive outcomes.
Individual differences in capacity for vicarious achievement relate to empathy, social connectedness, and self-other overlap, with some individuals showing stronger tendencies to experience others’ successes as their own.
The adaptive functions of vicarious achievement may include building social bonds, encouraging cooperation and mutual support, and expanding the range of experiences from which individuals can derive satisfaction and meaning.
Applications and Real-World Implications
Sports and Entertainment Industries
The sports and entertainment industries provide natural contexts for BIRGing behaviors and have been primary focuses for both research and practical applications of BIRGing principles.
Sports marketing strategies often capitalize on BIRGing by encouraging fan identification with teams and providing opportunities for fans to publicly display their associations through merchandise, social media, and other visible behaviors.
Team branding and fan engagement strategies recognize that successful teams attract more fan identification and merchandise sales, leading to efforts to create winning cultures and publicize achievements to maximize fan BIRGing.
Entertainment industry applications include celebrity endorsements, award show marketing, and fan community building that all leverage individuals’ tendencies to associate with successful entertainers and productions.
The economic implications of BIRGing in sports and entertainment are substantial, with successful teams and entertainers commanding premium prices for merchandise, tickets, and endorsement deals based partly on fans’ BIRGing behaviors.
Educational and Organizational Contexts
Educational institutions and organizations can benefit from understanding BIRGing principles in areas such as alumni relations, employee engagement, and institutional reputation management.
Alumni giving and engagement patterns often reflect BIRGing principles, with graduates showing stronger identification and support for their alma mater during periods of institutional success in athletics, academics, or other domains.
Employee identification with successful organizations can enhance job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and retention, suggesting that organizational success can create positive cycles of employee engagement through BIRGing mechanisms.
Recruitment and retention strategies can leverage institutional successes to attract and retain high-quality students, faculty, and employees who want to associate with successful organizations.
Reputation management efforts often focus on publicizing organizational achievements and successes to enhance stakeholder identification and support through BIRGing processes.
Marketing and Consumer Behavior
Marketing applications of BIRGing principles include brand association strategies, celebrity endorsements, and social proof tactics that leverage consumers’ desires to associate with successful brands and personalities.
Luxury branding strategies often capitalize on BIRGing by creating associations between consumers and high-status, successful, or prestigious entities, allowing consumers to enhance their own perceived status through product associations.
Social media marketing increasingly leverages BIRGing through influencer partnerships, user-generated content campaigns, and social sharing strategies that allow consumers to publicly associate with successful brands.
Consumer loyalty and brand switching behaviors can be understood partly through BIRGing principles, with consumers showing stronger loyalty to successful brands and greater likelihood of switching away from failing brands.
The timing of marketing campaigns around success events (product launches, awards, achievements) can maximize BIRGing effects by providing consumers with current reasons to associate with the brand.
Political and Social Movements
Political campaigns and social movements can utilize BIRGing principles to build support and encourage public identification with their causes and candidates.
Bandwagon effects in political campaigns partly reflect BIRGing processes, with voters showing increased support for candidates who appear to be winning or achieving success in polls, endorsements, or fundraising.
Social movement participation can be influenced by movement successes and achievements, with individuals more likely to publicly identify with and support movements that are achieving their goals.
Political party identification and activism often reflect BIRGing principles, with party members showing stronger identification and activity following electoral victories and policy successes.
The role of visible success in building political coalitions and social movements demonstrates the practical importance of creating and publicizing achievements to encourage BIRGing-based support.
Contemporary Research and Future Directions
Digital Age and Social Media
The digital age has created new contexts and opportunities for BIRGing behaviors, with social media platforms providing unprecedented opportunities for public association with successful others and groups.
Social media BIRGing includes sharing others’ successes, posting photos with successful people, and using profile pictures and cover photos that associate oneself with successful entities.
Online fan communities and digital engagement with successful brands, teams, and personalities represent modern expressions of BIRGing that can be measured and analyzed through digital analytics and social network analysis.
The psychology of social media sharing reveals BIRGing motivations in decisions about what content to share, when to share it, and how to present one’s associations with successful others.
Research on digital BIRGing is examining how online behaviors compare to offline BIRGing, whether digital contexts enhance or diminish the phenomenon, and how social media algorithms may amplify BIRGing behaviors.
Cross-Cultural and Global Perspectives
Contemporary research is expanding understanding of BIRGing across different cultural contexts, examining how cultural values and social structures influence the expression and functions of reflected glory behaviors.
Cross-cultural studies have revealed both universal and culture-specific aspects of BIRGing, with the basic phenomenon appearing across cultures but varying in magnitude and expression based on cultural values and social norms.
Collectivistic versus individualistic cultural orientations influence BIRGing patterns, with different cultures showing different patterns of group identification and individual versus group-based BIRGing behaviors.
Research in developing countries and non-Western contexts is expanding understanding of how BIRGing operates in different economic and social systems, revealing both similarities and differences in the phenomenon’s expression.
Global sports and entertainment contexts provide opportunities to study BIRGing across cultural boundaries, examining how international successes influence national and regional identification patterns.
Neuroscience and Biological Approaches
Contemporary neuroscience research is providing new insights into the brain mechanisms underlying BIRGing, revealing the neurobiological basis of vicarious success experiences and social identification processes.
Brain imaging studies during BIRGing experiences have identified neural networks involved in reward processing, social cognition, and self-evaluation that support the psychological processes underlying reflected glory behaviors.
Research on mirror neuron systems and social cognition is examining how the brain processes others’ successes and failures, providing insights into the neurobiological basis of vicarious experiences.
Hormonal studies of BIRGing situations are revealing physiological markers of vicarious success and failure that parallel the psychological and behavioral manifestations of the phenomenon.
Developmental neuroscience approaches are examining how BIRGing-related brain networks develop across the lifespan and how early experiences with vicarious success and failure shape neural development.
Intervention and Application Development
Contemporary research is increasingly focused on developing practical applications and interventions based on BIRGing principles to address real-world challenges and opportunities.
Therapeutic applications are being developed to help individuals with low self-esteem or depression benefit from positive associations and social connections that can provide reflected glory experiences.
Educational interventions are being designed to enhance student engagement and identification with academic institutions through strategic highlighting of institutional successes and achievements.
Organizational development applications are using BIRGing principles to enhance employee engagement and identification with successful organizations and teams.
Social intervention programs are leveraging BIRGing to encourage positive social behaviors and community engagement by connecting individuals with successful prosocial models and groups.
Conclusion
Basking in Reflected Glory represents a fundamental aspect of human social psychology that reveals the sophisticated strategies individuals employ to maintain positive self-concepts and manage their social identities. The extensive research on this phenomenon has demonstrated its robustness across diverse contexts, populations, and cultures while revealing the complex psychological mechanisms that underlie seemingly simple social behaviors.
The historical development of BIRGing research, from Cialdini’s foundational studies to contemporary neuroscience investigations, illustrates the progressive refinement of scientific understanding and the expansion of theoretical frameworks to encompass multiple levels of analysis. This research trajectory demonstrates how a straightforward observation about sports fan behavior evolved into a comprehensive understanding of self-enhancement and impression management processes.
The theoretical significance of BIRGing extends beyond its specific manifestations to its contributions to broader understanding of social identity, self-enhancement, and impression management processes. The phenomenon reveals how individuals actively and strategically manage their social associations to maximize psychological and social benefits while minimizing costs to their self-concept and social standing.
Empirical research has provided substantial evidence for BIRGing across multiple domains and contexts while revealing important individual differences and situational factors that moderate its expression. This research has established BIRGing as a reliable and theoretically important phenomenon while also revealing the complexity and sophistication of the underlying psychological processes.
The practical applications of BIRGing principles across domains including sports marketing, organizational behavior, education, and social interventions demonstrate the phenomenon’s relevance beyond academic psychology. These applications reveal how understanding basic psychological processes can inform strategies for influence, engagement, and behavior change in real-world contexts.
Contemporary research directions, including digital age applications, cross-cultural investigations, and neuroscience approaches, promise to further expand understanding of BIRGing while revealing new applications and implications. These developments suggest that BIRGing will continue to be an active and important area of research in social psychology.
The study of BIRGing ultimately contributes to fundamental understanding of human social nature, revealing how individuals navigate complex social environments through strategic association and identity management. This understanding has implications not only for predicting and influencing individual behavior but also for designing social systems and contexts that support positive identity development and social functioning.
References
- Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 366-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366
- Cialdini, R. B., & Richardson, K. D. (1980). Two indirect tactics of image management: Basking and blasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 406-415. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.406
- End, C. M., Dietz-Uhler, B., Harrick, E. A., & Jacquemotte, L. (2002). Identifying with winners: A reexamination of sport fans’ tendency to BIRG. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 1017-1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00253.x
- Hirt, E. R., Zillmann, D., Erickson, G. A., & Kennedy, C. (1992). Costs and benefits of allegiance: Changes in fans’ self-ascribed competencies after team victory versus defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 724-738. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.724
- Kimble, C. E., Kimble, E. A., & Croy, N. A. (1998). Development of self-presentational concerns in children and the role of gender. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22(4), 859-873. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502598384306
- Madrigal, R. (2000). The influence of social alliances with sports teams on intentions to purchase corporate sponsors’ products. Journal of Advertising, 29(4), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673621
- Miller, F. M. (2009). Impact of organizational reputation on basking in reflected glory among employees. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230250567
- Snyder, C. R., Lassegard, M., & Ford, C. E. (1986). Distancing after group success and failure: Basking in reflected glory and cutting off reflected failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.382
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole. https://www.worldcat.org/title/social-psychology-of-intergroup-relations/oclc/4365642
- Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 14(2), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/019372359001400203