Health Psychology

The contemporary media landscape frequently shines a spotlight on the various challenges that plague our healthcare system. From the lack of health insurance coverage for many Americans to the alarming surge in obesity leading to unprecedented rates of diabetes, and the escalating healthcare costs that often culminate in personal bankruptcies – these issues are underscored by the backdrop of a national scarcity of medical professionals. It becomes evident that despite the marvels of cutting-edge medical technology and an extension of the average human lifespan, our healthcare ecosystem is in the throes of a crisis. However, this portrayal often falls short of encompassing the entire canvas of health, as it tends to hyper-focus on advanced biological and pharmaceutical treatments while sidelining the integral role of behavior in shaping health outcomes. This dichotomy extends into the medical domain and the healthcare consumer sphere, where the emphasis leans heavily toward “sick care” or acute interventions, rather than holistic wellness and preventive measures.

Undoubtedly, the urgency of promptly treating a heart attack in an elderly grandmother by an ER physician is indisputable. But the nuanced perspective arises when we consider whether knowledge about her inclination for fried foods, lifelong smoking habit, or her development of obesity-related Type II diabetes should influence decisions regarding the allocation of resources to save her life or embark on her journey to health restoration. These moral and ethical quandaries prompt broader societal introspection about the responsibility for an individual’s health status and the financial underpinnings of their care. The predicament of healthcare is multifaceted, with no panacea in sight. The junction of ethical considerations tied to personal lifestyle choices, individual rights, and the access to healthcare intersects complexly with affordability and availability. It is within this labyrinthine landscape that the emerging field of health psychology is poised to play an instrumental role in shaping responses to present and future healthcare challenges.

Health psychology, a burgeoning discipline within the realm of psychology, interweaves the scientific exploration and clinical application of psychological principles with the domains of medicine and public health. It seamlessly draws from health promotion, epidemiology, health education, and health policy, thereby embracing a comprehensive approach. While conventional Western medicine traditionally concentrates on identifying and treating the anatomical and physiological causes of ailments, epidemiology delves into understanding disease distribution, related risk factors, and methods of control within populations. Moreover, the realm of public health extends its purview to encompass health promotion, communication, education, and even interventions in the realm of environmental health, collectively aimed at averting illnesses and augmenting individual as well as communal health.

An essential milestone occurred in 1978 when the American Psychological Association (APA) established Division 38, aptly titled “Health Psychology,” as a conduit for fostering collaboration between psychologists and other healthcare practitioners invested in exploring the psychological and behavioral dimensions of both mental and physical health. At its core, health psychology operates within the framework of a biopsychosocial model of health and illness. This paradigm transcends the confines of the traditional biomedical model prevalent in Western medicine. By eschewing the separation of mental processes from the body’s physiological workings, the biopsychosocial model takes into account the profound influence of behavior and environment on health and illness outcomes. Health psychologists advocate for this holistic model, seeing it as a beacon of optimism to usher in improvements for individual and public health, as well as for healthcare systems at large.

The leading causes of mortality in the United States – heart disease, cancer, stroke, accidents, and lung disease – present a stark contrast to the death patterns observed at the turn of the 20th century in 1900. Infectious diseases like pneumonia, influenza, tuberculosis, and intestinal illnesses held sway back then, until public sanitation measures and immunization campaigns ushered in a transformation. The shift from infectious diseases to chronic, lifestyle-driven maladies underlines a new reality where individuals are, to a significant extent, succumbing to the cumulative effects of their own choices. Remarkably, around half of the annual deaths in the United States are attributed to preventable behavioral factors. The significance of behavior is unmistakable. Health psychologists tirelessly delve into understanding the roots of detrimental behaviors like smoking, excessive dietary fat intake, and risky sexual practices, while concurrently devising strategies to amplify health-promoting behaviors such as regular exercise and stress management. This exposition not only delves into the theories and models that underpin health psychology but also elucidates the methodologies used in research and the tangible applications in practice. Additionally, it places health psychology within the broader tapestry of health-related disciplines and contemplates the trajectories that lie ahead for this ever-evolving field.

Theory

In the prevailing Western healthcare paradigm, the biomedical model takes center stage, often cleaving the intricate connection between the mind and body. Within this framework, health psychology emerges as a vanguard, attuned to the significance of anatomy and physiology in disease diagnosis, comprehension, and intervention. Nonetheless, health psychology unveils a richer perspective by directing its focus towards the psychological and social dimensions. Within this lens, health psychologists acknowledge the intricately woven tapestry of reciprocal interactions between biological, psychological, and social factors that jointly shape the landscape of health and illness. In their pursuit, health psychologists embrace a holistic stance, recognizing the entwined nature of these influences.

A health psychologist’s purview is notably comprehensive, encompassing the interplay of diverse variables. These encompass biological facets, including genetic predispositions and immune system responses. Yet, the canvas extends further to encompass the psychological and behavioral intricacies that sculpt one’s perception of stressors, the strategies employed for coping, and the very lifestyle choices that reverberate throughout health trajectories. Encompassing all, are the societal undercurrents that hold immense sway, including interpersonal relationships, cultural influences, and the surrounding environment. It’s within this intricate dance of variables that health psychologists sculpt their theories, striving to elucidate the complex genesis of wellness and illness. In the same breath, these theoretical frameworks serve as bedrock for crafting interventions that embrace a multifaceted approach.

In essence, health psychology bridges the chasm between the mechanistic view of the biomedical model and the nuanced interdependence intrinsic to human health. It navigates beyond mere anatomical and physiological markers, plumbing the depths of human experiences, behaviors, and interactions. This approach doesn’t supplant the importance of biological underpinnings; rather, it harmonizes with them, enriching our understanding of health through the synergistic interplay of psychological, behavioral, and social elements. The health psychologist emerges as an interpreter, deciphering the intricate narratives spun by these diverse forces, to pave the way for more comprehensive, tailored, and effective interventions that honor the complexity of human well-being.

Social Cognitive Theory and Related Models

“Keep yourself clean and bright; you are the window through which you must see the world.” – George Bernard Shaw

In the realm of health psychology, Albert Bandura’s social cognitive theory stands as an expansive framework that casts a nuanced light upon health behaviors, serving as a cornerstone for enhancing positive health practices while diminishing health-compromising actions. Central to Bandura’s proposition is the intricate interplay between the environment, individual behaviors, and personal cognitions, a concept eloquently termed reciprocal determinism. Embedded within social cognitive theory is a pivotal acknowledgment of the pivotal role that personal learning encounters (like past attempts to quit smoking) and the act of witnessing others’ experiences (vicarious learning from observing a friend’s endeavor to quit smoking) play in comprehending and instigating behavior change.

At the heart of Bandura’s construct are five critical determinants of behavior. The first of these is knowledge, exemplified by the scenario where an individual’s awareness of smoking hazards could propel them towards reducing smoking. The second determinant is self-efficacy, an individual’s perceived confidence in executing a specific behavior within a given context. For instance, the likelihood of a successful smoking cessation endeavor rises when one possesses a robust sense of confidence, as opposed to harboring doubts about their capacity to refrain from smoking amidst various situations, be it socializing or coping with stress. Another determinant delves into the realm of outcome expectancies – positive and negative. These expectations encompass physical reactions, societal responses, and self-evaluative repercussions an individual anticipates as a result of their actions. Envisioning easier breathing, garnering support for cessation efforts, and nurturing positive feelings about quitting smoking align with a successful smoking cessation endeavor.

Goal setting occupies the fourth determinant slot, advocating for goals that harmonize with one’s values and are proximal, and thereby achievable, as opposed to those that loom distantly. Rewards are potent catalysts, underlining the importance of linking efforts with tangible incentives. The final determinant traverses the terrain of personal perceptions concerning the environmental and social backing for change. These perceptions either bolster one’s resolve by providing access to supporting health services or introduce barriers by complicating access to necessary interventions.

Self-efficacy stands as a linchpin within social cognitive theory, recognized as a pivotal force propelling behavior. This sense of perceived confidence is shaped by diverse forces, including past experiences, observations of others, verbal encouragement, and emotional reactions. For instance, confidence levels soar when previous quitting attempts have been successful, when one witnesses someone else’s triumphant cessation, when verbal reinforcement echoes the endeavor, and when anxiety about quitting remains at bay. The resounding impact of self-efficacy cascades into active efforts towards health behaviors while simultaneously exerting a subtler influence over goal establishment, outcome expectancies, and the perception of support and hindrances.

The journey doesn’t conclude with social cognitive theory; it extends into models that embody its tenets. One such model, Becker’s health belief model (HBM), spotlights personal perceptions. It knits together beliefs about the risk of illness and the severity of its consequences, as well as beliefs about the efficacy of specific health behaviors and the barriers posed by such behaviors. Another model, the theory of planned behavior (TPB), hones in on the interplay between attitudes and behaviors, with intention emerging as a linchpin. Intentions stem from a blend of outcome expectations, social perceptions, and the perceived control over a given behavior. The interplay between these models brings forth a holistic understanding, backed by the essence of Bandura’s social cognitive theory, where self-efficacy reigns as a dominant force shaping behaviors.

These models offer a glimpse into the intricate tapestry that is human behavior, bearing testimony to the intricate dance of cognitive processes, societal influences, and personal motivations. Through the lens of social cognitive theory and its offshoots, the field of health psychology continues to decipher the codes of behavior change, providing a compass that guides individuals towards healthier, more fulfilling lives.

Transtheoretical Model

Another frequently utilized model in health psychology is the transtheoretical model (TTM; Prochaska & DiClemente, 1982). As the name transtheoretical implies, this model draws from many theories and emphasizes similarities across theories rather than differences among them. The TTM is a model of change across time and was initially developed from studies of successful efforts to change smoking behavior. Prochaska and DiClemente noted that change is a process rather than a single event. The stages of change (SOC) describe readiness to change and are a primary component of the TTM.

The first SOC is the precontemplation stage, whereby an individual does not see him- or herself as needing to change and is not motivated to change. The second SOC is the contemplation stage, in which an individual weighs the pros and cons of changing his or her current behavior. For example, a person may acknowledge a number of positive outcomes associated with smoking (e.g., socialization) but also notes a number of negative outcomes associated with smoking (e.g., clothes smell). The individual is ambivalent about change during this stage.

The third SOC is the preparation stage. In this stage, an individual is less ambivalent than individuals contemplating the need to change, but is not fully ready to change overt behavior. For example, a smoker in the preparation SOC may research options for quitting smoking but is not ready to act on them. The fourth SOC is the action stage, in which an individual actively changes behavior. For example, a smoker in this stage may seek treatment, join a self-help group, or announce to friends that he or she has quit smoking and thrown out his or her cigarettes. The final SOC is the maintenance stage, whereby an individual works actively to sustain changes already achieved. Relapse is unfortunately frequent in health behavior change, and people often cycle through stages rather than going through the five stages in a linear manner.

The TTM relates to the broader social cognitive theory. Movement through the stages of change is more likely when self-efficacy for change is high. In addition, movement through the stages is more likely when the pros of changing behavior exceed the cons of changing behavior (i.e., decisional balance). Finally, the TTM proposes that specific processes of change should be carefully matched with the individual’s SOC. Most interventions assume readiness to change and target individuals in the action stage, making these interventions potentially inappropriate for individuals in other stages of change. Information in the form of consciousness raising and self-evaluation may be most helpful in the early stages, whereas specific coping strategies such as contingency management and stimulus control may be most helpful in the later stages of change. Consistent with the TTM, across 12 health behaviors (e.g., quitting smoking, using sunscreen, using condoms) the pros of changing increased between precontemplation and contemplation and the cons of changing decreased between contemplation and action. Further, stage-matched smoking cessation interventions have been found to exceed non-stage-specific smoking cessation interventions (Prochaska & Velicer, 1997).

Methods

“Science is the tool of the Western mind, and with it, more doors can be opened than with bare hands.” – C. G. Jung

In the realm of health psychology, the pursuit of knowledge extends as a key to unlocking the intricate workings of health-related behaviors. With intention and methodical precision, researchers strive to decode the complexities of behaviors, cognitions, and emotions that shape our well-being. This pursuit is twofold: safeguarding health and orchestrating the treatment of ailments. In this endeavor, health psychology stands as a bridge, drawing from an eclectic array of empirical insights and research methodologies culled from diverse arenas of basic science and practical application.

The tapestry of health psychology is woven from the threads of various disciplines. It draws deeply from the well of social psychology, developmental psychology, learning theories, and personality psychology, each contributing their unique insights into human behavior and cognition. Further enriching the weave are contributions from the realms of human and animal anatomy, physiology, epidemiology, sociology, and even marketing. This fusion of knowledge brings forth a multidisciplinary symphony, resonating with the complex symphony of factors that influence health behaviors.

The essence of health psychology lies in its approach. It is not confined to silos but rather seeks to understand the intricate interplay of individual minds, societal constructs, and the physiological fabric that binds them. As C. G. Jung astutely noted, science serves as the vehicle through which our understanding extends beyond the limits of our hands. It is a means to probe deeply into the human experience, illuminating the corners of behavior and emotion that were once shrouded in obscurity. This pursuit allows us to venture into the very heart of health-related behaviors, providing insights that propel interventions, change trajectories, and ultimately improve lives.

As health psychology continues to evolve, it unfurls new vistas, inviting researchers to explore the uncharted territories of human health and well-being. It serves as a testament to the power of science as a guiding beacon, shedding light on the path towards a healthier future. Through its multidisciplinary tapestry, health psychology carves out a space where theories meet reality, and where interventions are not just conceived but rigorously tested and refined. This fusion of knowledge and application, of theory and practice, ensures that health psychology remains a driving force in the journey towards optimal well-being.

Epidemiological Research Designs

Epidemiological research emerges as a cornerstone in the arsenal of tools employed by health psychologists. It is a methodological avenue that involves the systematic tracking of human samples to unearth risk factors – think cigarette smoking – and protective factors – like early cancer screenings – within the context of disease. Through epidemiology, unique statistical measures like prevalence and incidence rates come to the fore, serving as compasses in navigating the landscape of health. Prevalence rates illuminate the proportion of the population affected by a disease at a specific moment, offering a snapshot of both preventive and treatment outcomes. Meanwhile, incidence rates spotlight the proportion of fresh diagnoses within a year, offering insights crucial for assessing preventive strategies.

As an illustration, envision health psychologists targeting programs for teen abstinence and safer sex practices in one city, juxtaposed against a control city devoid of interventions. In this scenario, a decrease in the incidence of teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections in the intervention city, as compared to a constant rate in the control city, would signal the efficacy of the interventions. Relative risk surfaces as another pivotal metric, delineating the ratio of disease incidence or prevalence among those exposed to a risk factor versus those unexposed. For instance, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data from 2005 suggests that female smokers are 13 times more likely to develop lung cancer compared to non-smokers.

In the realm of health psychology and beyond, retrospective and prospective nonexperimental cohort designs emerge as common methodologies. The retrospective cohort design marks the starting point, unraveling the potential influences of risk and protective factors on disease. This design commences with individuals already diagnosed with the condition of interest. For instance, in Sacco and colleagues’ 2001 study, a diverse group of New York males who had survived a stroke comprised the initial pool. A control group, devoid of a stroke history, was curated from a similar demographic, closely matched on crucial variables. The study delved into the impact of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), or “good cholesterol,” which escorts the detrimental low-density lipoprotein (LDL) out of the body. The findings tentatively suggested that HDL might shield against strokes. However, the “seems to” here draws attention to the inherent limitations of retrospective designs – while convenient, they cannot establish causal relationships since they lack temporal assessment and researcher control over variables.

In contrast, prospective designs emerge as longitudinal in nature, tracing a representative healthy population over time, during which some individuals may fall ill while others remain healthy. A prime example is the Nurses’ Health Study, a monumental prospective cohort study commencing in 1976 with 127,000 female nurses aged 30 to 55. This study, led by Dr. Frank Speizer, periodically captures the participants’ medical histories, dietary habits, and significant life events. Over 260 scientific publications have emerged from this endeavor. The study’s two-decade milestone revealed the protective impact of polyunsaturated fat against coronary heart disease while trans fat intake heightened the risk (Oh et al., 2005). Importantly, dietary carbohydrate and fiber intake bore no relation to breast cancer risk (Holmes et al., 2004). This glimpse into the realm of prospective research illustrates its power in unraveling complex health interactions across time, providing valuable insights for evidence-based health interventions.

Randomized Controlled Trials

Within the realm of health psychology, the randomized controlled trial (RCT) emerges as a time-tested research design, akin to the bedrock of experimental inquiry in psychology. At its core, the RCT empowers researchers to manipulate an independent variable (such as an intervention) while keenly observing its effects on dependent variables with relevance to disease (like cholesterol levels). This design boasts distinctive attributes, spearheaded by random assignment of human participants to various conditions. To illustrate, imagine an RCT probing the effects of yoga on heart health. Here, the independent variable would be the yoga training regimen (versus no training), while the dependent variables encompass physiological markers of heart fitness and stress. Crucially, participants are not allowed to choose their experimental condition; they are randomly assigned to ensure group comparability at the study’s outset. This mechanism underpins the capacity to attribute post-study differences in dependent variables solely to the manipulated independent variable. In essence, RCTs act as vanguards, unveiling the causes and protections against diseases. However, the inception of a valuable RCT hinges upon prior groundwork, often gleaned from retrospective, prospective, and other basic science research.

Within the realm of RCTs, the placebo effect emerges as a fascinating facet. It represents the alteration induced by an individual’s belief in a treatment, rather than the treatment itself. Although a captivating mind-body phenomenon, the placebo effect introduces complexity, particularly for health psychology RCTs. A significant portion of the efficacy of antidepressant medications, around 50 percent, is attributed to patients’ positive expectations about the drugs’ effectiveness (Kirsch & Sapirstein, 1998). Hence, for scientific rigor, RCTs must navigate the placebo effect, often employing “blinding.” In a double-blinded design, both participants and research assistants remain ignorant of the experimental condition. For instance, in a study exploring a new medication for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), participants are unaware if they’re receiving the active medication or a placebo, a “sugar pill.” This blinding extends even to research assistants, circumventing inadvertent signaling.

However, behavioral interventions often defy blinding due to participant involvement. Consider an exercise intervention targeting weight loss in diabetes patients. This intervention is unmistakable to participants, creating an inherent challenge for blinding. Yet, researchers navigate this hurdle by manipulating expectations. Participants not assigned to the exercise group might engage in an active control condition, like reading, with the experimenter conveying an expectation that reading promotes weight loss. Furthermore, research assistants, oblivious to randomized conditions, assess dependent variables like blood sugar levels, upholding scientific objectivity.

In essence, RCTs in health psychology are both art and science, artfully crafting rigorous experimental designs while navigating the intricate terrain of human behaviors, beliefs, and expectations. Through meticulous planning, they advance our understanding of interventions, enabling researchers to sift the true impacts from the intricate interplay of variables, guiding us closer to evidence-based health enhancements.

Meta-Analysis

In the cacophony of health-related information disseminated by the media, discrepancies abound, and individual studies often emerge as disparate fragments if assessed in isolation. Replicating research findings thus emerges as a cornerstone of scientific progress, offering a path to validate or challenge initial claims. A potent tool in navigating this landscape is the meta-analysis, a mechanism that surveys research findings across studies to unveil the undercurrents of consistency. As a study of studies, meta-analysis takes the form of a systematic quantitative review, typically focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), that encapsulates the efficacy of an intervention within a specific context, be it an illness or a particular population.

In some instances, meta-analyses crystallize into definitive pronouncements, shaping the trajectory of future research and pointing towards novel avenues of exploration. A case in point is the meta-analysis by Dusseldorp et al. (1999), delving into the effectiveness of health education and stress management programs for individuals grappling with cardiac events, commonly heart attacks. Their analysis synthesized 37 studies, revealing that these cardiac rehabilitation programs led to a 34 percent reduction in patient deaths attributed to heart issues and a 29 percent decrease in recurring heart attacks compared to patients outside such programs. These findings assume tangible significance, influencing decisions made by institutions like the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, which rely on scientifically informed recommendations to refine cardiovascular disease rehabilitation guidelines.

However, the path is not always straightforward. At times, meta-analyses fail to deliver conclusive findings, leaving debates hanging in the air. A poignant example pertains to psychological interventions for cancer patients. A pivotal study by Spiegel et al. (1989) seemingly suggested that supportive group psychotherapy extended the lives of metastatic breast cancer patients, triggering profound discussions and even media attention. Yet, subsequent studies failed to consistently replicate this finding. The very journal that once showcased this research now found itself hosting debates on the efficacy of psychological interventions for cancer patients. Lepore and Coyne (2006) interpreted the literature and meta-analyses as refuting the value of psychological interventions, while Andrykowski and Manne (2006) found support for psychological interventions in managing distress among certain cancer patients. The meta-analyses, while powerful, could not concretely sway the pendulum towards one definitive stance.

In essence, the meta-analysis is a tool that shines a spotlight on the intricate tapestry of research consistency, sometimes illuminating a clear path and at other times unveiling the nuances that defy easy categorization. The journey towards scientific truth is not always linear; it meanders through the corridors of empirical investigation, guided by meta-analyses that mirror the complexity of human health and behavior.

Applications

The landscape of health psychology is adorned with a diverse array of professionals, each contributing their unique expertise to bridge the chasm between research and the intricate tapestry of human health. At the forefront, experimental health psychologists emerge, often rooted in the disciplines of social psychology or developmental psychology. They inhabit the realms of academia and research, where their ingenuity fuels discoveries that illuminate the mechanisms driving health behaviors.

However, the heartbeat of health psychology resounds in its application. This mantle is shouldered by health psychologists with training in applied clinical or counseling psychology. These practitioners navigate a labyrinth of settings, weaving their expertise into the fabric of medical centers, medical schools, rehabilitation facilities, private practices, and academic institutions. Their role is as multifaceted as the individuals they serve, crafting interventions that are informed by rigorous research while being tailored to the unique needs of their clients.

In this orchestration, applied health psychologists find themselves as architects of change, sculpting interventions that range from preventive strategies to holistic well-being enhancement. Their impact resonates not just within consultation rooms but also in the broader sphere of public health. With each interaction, they illuminate paths towards healthier lifestyles, guide individuals through the maze of chronic illnesses, and offer solace and support to those grappling with the complexities of health.

Notably, the ranks of these professionals have swelled in recent history, attesting to the growing recognition of the pivotal role they play. Their work holds the promise of better health outcomes, not just for individuals but for communities at large. Through their efforts, the science of health psychology transitions from the abstract realm of research into tangible improvements in quality of life. In this fusion of academia, research, and practice, the applications of health psychology weave a tapestry that is as diverse and vibrant as the people it serves.

Prevention

Within the realm of health psychology, one resounding application resonates: the realm of health promotion and disease prevention. Dr. Joseph Pizzorno’s assertion, that half the financial burden of illness squandered on preventable conditions, echoes as a rallying cry for these endeavors.

Prevention, a multi-faceted endeavor, unfolds in three stages: primary, secondary, and tertiary. In the primary arena, efforts are aimed at individuals in the throes of health, well before the shadows of symptoms or illness descend. Here, the goal is preservation, the preservation of wellness. An emblematic example is the addition of fluoride to water supplies, a measure that stands as a sentinel guarding against dental cavities.

As the journey progresses, secondary prevention strides forward. This phase extends its arm to those perched on the precipice of illness, individuals recognized as being at risk. The intervention’s compass aligns with risk mitigation, seeking to avert the looming specter of health issues. Picture a low-fat diet tailored for someone grappling with elevated cholesterol levels. The aim here is twofold: to forestall the entry into the realm of illness and to shepherd individuals toward a healthier trajectory.

Finally, the tertiary phase unfurls its mantle over those who have already confronted the challenges of illness. Here, the focus turns toward minimizing disability or even stalling death’s relentless advance. Tertiary prevention programs march in tandem with rehabilitation efforts, equipping individuals with strategies that amplify compliance with essential regimens. Think of behavioral interventions designed to fortify adherence to insulin and dietary protocols for those wrestling with diabetes.

In this symphony of prevention, health psychology emerges as a vital conductor. Its nuanced understanding of human behavior and motivations shapes interventions that resonate with individuals at every stage of the health continuum. Prevention is not just about averting crisis; it’s a testament to the power of knowledge and empowerment, a testament that affirms the potential for health and vitality across lifetimes.

Biopsychosocial Pathways to Health

A sad soul can kill you quicker, far quicker, than a germ.

—John Steinbeck

In the intricate landscape of health psychology, the interplay between traditional medical interventions and the nuanced realm of psychological and social interventions unfolds with profound implications. A symphony of pathways illuminates this dynamic dance, each resonating with the potential to transform health care, enhance patient well-being, and curtail the burgeoning costs of illness.

Among these pathways, a beacon of insight emerges, guiding us through the biopsychosocial tapestry of health. At its core, this intricate network unravels across six interconnected routes, each bearing the promise of better health outcomes and greater quality of life.

The first avenue navigates through the power of information and self-help. By empowering individuals with knowledge about their conditions, such as through programs like the Arthritis Self-Management course, the journey towards accessing professional medical care becomes a partnership, informed by personal agency. This pathway bridges the gap between patient and provider, fostering informed decisions that pave the way for improved health.

The second route delves into the delicate balance between psychological stress and physiological well-being. The symphony of our nervous systems, orchestrated by the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches, plays a pivotal role. While prolonged stress triggers a cascade of negative physiological responses, interventions like mindfulness-based stress reduction illuminate a path towards harmony, fostering relaxation and positive health outcomes.

In the third passage, behaviors emerge as protagonists in the narrative of health. Lifestyle choices, often the key culprits behind leading causes of mortality, come into focus. Health psychologists step in as conductors of change, partnering with individuals to enhance compliance with crucial health-related behaviors. Whether guiding diabetic patients towards effective self-management or pioneering comprehensive lifestyle programs, such as those that can even reverse heart disease, the impact on health is profound.

A fourth route winds through the landscape of social support. The connection between robust social networks and enhanced physical and mental health is undeniable. The weave of relationships, laden with emotional support, resources, and positive behaviors, emerges as a potent elixir for well-being. Yet, the threads of this tapestry are delicate; strained relationships cast a shadow on health, reminding us of the delicate interplay between heart and mind.

These biopsychosocial pathways reveal the intricate dance between health and human experience. They remind us that health is not confined to the realm of biology; it is an intricate interplay of psychological, social, and physiological forces. As the symphony of health psychology crescendos, its practitioners navigate these pathways, harmonizing traditional medicine with the symphony of human nature to compose a symphony that resonates with well-being and vitality.

In the intricate tapestry of health, the tender thread of social support weaves a profound narrative of healing and comfort. Through the presence of a doula, a paraprofessional guiding a woman through the transformative journey of labor, this thread blooms into a lifeline of emotional solace, physical relief, and empowerment. Women who are accompanied by doulas during labor experience a symphony of benefits, including fewer Cesarean section surgeries, swifter labor, and reduced hospitalization rates for newborns—an exquisite melody of care (Klaus et al., 1992).

Yet, the symphony of well-being extends further, touching the depths of mental health. Amid the hustle of emergency medical care, a chorus of emotions often remains unheard. Heavy users of emergency care often bear the weight of depressive and anxious sentiments, revealing the intimate dance between psychological well-being and medical intervention (Ford et al., 2004). Echoes of these sentiments reverberate through the landscape of chronic illness, where patient reports of negative emotions resonate as prognostic whispers. Such emotions intertwine with the fates of diseases like cardiovascular ailments and diabetes, shaping outcomes with their powerful influence (Barefoot et al., 2000; Lustman, Frank, & McGill, 1991).

However, the symphony is not solely composed of somber notes. Positivity, too, emerges as a healing melody. The harmonies of hope and curiosity stand as guardians against the onslaught of illnesses like hypertension, diabetes, and respiratory infections (Richman et al., 2005). Yet, in the realm of emergency care, recognition often eludes the subtle nuances of psychiatric distress. Physicians, even amidst their healing artistry, sometimes falter in perceiving the quiet cries of depression and panic (Gerard, Michael, & Gerard, 2005).

In this interplay, another pathway illuminates the expression of psychological distress through physical manifestations. The enigmatic somatoform disorders come to light—disorders where the language of suffering is spoken through bodily symptoms. Amid the healthcare landscape, the healing prowess of biomedical interventions sometimes stands still before the complex dance of the mind. The narrative of somatization disorder emerges as a poignant reminder that health encompasses not only the biological, but the psychological as well. Recognizing and addressing psychological distress becomes a poignant mission—essential to holistic healing and economic prudence alike.

In this grand orchestration, social support emerges as a healer, cradling the soul in times of vulnerability and guiding the journey towards well-being. The symphony of emotions and interventions converge in a harmonious dance—one that propels health psychology into an era of empathy, understanding, and integrated care.

Health Policy

In the grand theater of health, the role of health psychologists extends beyond individual journeys of transformation. A symphony of voices converges, shaping the narratives of public health policies that ripple through communities, nurturing change on a larger canvas. In an era where obesity plagues societies, health psychologists rise as advocates of change, orchestrating shifts that echo far beyond individual choices.

Within the embrace of escalating obesity rates, health psychologists wield knowledge as a beacon of change. Yet, the landscape is complex, where awareness alone is often insufficient to guide us away from treacherous paths. As more than 60 percent of the American populace grapples with overweight or obesity, the perilous consequences loom large (CDC, n.d.). The culprits—sedentary lifestyles and diets laden with trans fats—paint a stark picture of modern living.

In this arena, the health psychologist’s gaze extends beyond singular actions to the broader tapestry of environments. Dr. Kelly Brownell, a Yale University luminary, casts light on the fast-food industry’s echoes of “Big Tobacco,” a potent reminder of history repeating itself (Huckabee, 2006). Armed with expertise, he resonates as one of the 100 most influential people, fostering discourse that bridges nutrition, obesity, and policy. From his helm, the “Twinkie tax” emerges, proposing a levy on junk food—an anthem for change that rouses and reshapes. In a landscape of individual liberties and political intricacies, Brownell’s clarion call resounds: Protect the public from dietary dangers, despite the odds.

In the heart of urban life, New York City’s pulse beats in resonance. Historic legislation unfurls, as the city raises its banner against trans fats in restaurants (Brownell, 2006). Brownell stands as an expert witness in this momentous narrative, lending his voice to protect the well-being of millions. As the curtain lifts in 2008, a new act commences—one that draws the map of a healthier tomorrow.

Amid these endeavors, health psychologists unfurl the sails of change, navigating the crossroads of individual actions and societal choices. The symphony of health policy resonates, inviting harmony between knowledge and action, between individuals and communities. In this transformative symphony, health psychologists take the stage, poised to shape a healthier future for all.

Comparisons

In the realm of health psychology, a diverse ensemble of professionals takes the stage, each with their unique roles and harmonies. Among these, clinical psychologists often don the mantle of health psychologists, navigating the intricate interplay of prevention and treatment in the medical landscape. A spectrum of education paves the path—some embark with a master’s, while others traverse the doctoral route, often earning the prestigious PhD. The journey demands a fervent dedication, marked by stellar academic records and formidable GRE scores. This pilgrimage entails two to three years for a master’s and a minimum of five years for a doctoral degree, crowned with a yearlong internship, frequently within a medical school. Many continue their voyage with post-doctoral training, refining their expertise, honing research acumen, and gaining licensure.

While “psychologist” is the bastion of doctoral pioneers, master’s-level health psychology alumni find their niche as psychological associates or counselors in select states. Parallel to their clinical and counseling counterparts, applied health psychologists shine as virtuosos of assessment and treatment, mastering the nuances of anxiety, depression, and beyond. But their artistry transcends, embracing biology, epidemiology, and behavioral medicine, carving a unique niche. Divergent pathways beckon—some unravel the mysteries of basic health psychology research, unraveling the dance of behavior and immune system. Others illuminate the path of consultants or agents of change, molding environments to foster health.

In the health arena, they forge bridges and forge links with physicians, nurses, and more. Like physicians in integrative medicine, they weave a biopsychosocial narrative that transcends conventional boundaries. Yet, they don’t wield prescriptions or scalpels. Instead, they harmonize with nurses in client-centered care, weaving prevention into their tapestry. Nutritionists and physical therapists share their stage—the former prescribing dietary nuances, the latter sculpting the body’s vigor. Health psychologists harness the symphony of these influences, harmonizing the chorus of health, culture, environment, and policy.

Amid this symphony, labels meld—”medical psychology,” “behavioral medicine,” and “health psychology” interchangeably grace the score. The canvas unfurls for health psychologists, each note a testament to their integrative prowess. In this cadence, health psychologists stand united, sculpting a future where health harmonizes with humanity.

Future Directions

In the evolving landscape of healthcare, the melody is shifting towards a resounding economic chord—the “bottom line.” Friedman and colleagues’ symphony (1995) resounds with instances of cost savings through psychosocial interventions interwoven with medical care. The traditional insurance script, segregating physical and mental health, takes center stage. A separate deductible is demanded for each, with divergent reimbursements. Yet, advocates of the biopsychosocial health paradigm orchestrate a new crescendo. They wield their batons against the mind/body divide, rallying for equitable coverage of behavioral and medical services. Their anthem is the call for “parity laws,” heralding an era where mind and body are accorded equal healthcare standing.

This symphony of change resonates with themes of inclusivity and unity. The biopsychosocial maestros resolutely push boundaries, challenging the compartmentalization of care. Their opus is a harmonious blend of psychological, social, and biological elements, cultivating a tapestry where all components coalesce. In this burgeoning movement, the composition of health and wellness is transformed, and the symphony of care embraces a wider spectrum of influences.

As the future unfolds, this orchestra of transformation will conduct thorough examinations, probing the intricate relationships between psychological, social, and traditional biological facets of health and illness. With each resonant note, the canvas of healthcare broadens, reflecting a shift towards holistic well-being. Financial reimbursement too will witness a metamorphosis, moving towards a more encompassing and equitable stage.

The overture to this future envisions a healthcare symphony resonating with unity and parity, a harmonious ensemble where the orchestra of health psychology, alongside traditional medical care, ushers in a new era of comprehensive care, setting a precedent for a healthier world.

Quality Versus Quantity of Life

Death is not the greatest loss in life. The greatest loss is what dies inside us while we live.

—Norman Cousins

In the realm of existence, it is not death that marks the greatest loss, but rather the fading of the vibrant embers within us as we journey through life—a sentiment eloquently expressed by Norman Cousins. As health psychology progresses, its role is poised to expand into the corridors of politics and public health. Dr. Robert M. Kaplan, an advocate for transformative change in health-care research and policy, envisions a future where the focus broadens beyond treating disease or specific symptoms. Kaplan’s vision, illuminated by a poignant cartoon featuring “Ziggy,” portrays life’s essence as the pursuit of meaningful engagement—an endeavor that chronic illnesses may eclipse.

Kaplan’s clarion call resounds for a shift from mere longevity to encompassing the symphony of life’s quality. In his prescription, the interplay between patient and doctor becomes a shared dialogue, transcending the uncertain terrain of medical decisions. For instance, men grappling with prostate cancer confront divergent paths—surgical intervention or vigilant observation. The former may vanquish the ailment at a cost, while the latter preserves present vitality while courting future risks.

As the annals of time unveil the progression from acute infections to chronic ailments, Kaplan and fellow health psychologists advocate for a recalibration in evaluating health-care outcomes. For acute maladies, disease-specific metrics suffice. Yet, the landscape shifts for chronic afflictions. In this terrain, where the resonance of daily life matters most, self-reports illuminate the canvas. The canvas transforms into an intricate mosaic, where quality of life, functionality, and emotional well-being compose the symphony of health.

In the tapestry of existence, health psychology’s encore resounds with a new verse—one where life’s vitality takes precedence over the mere absence of ailment. As these principles permeate political corridors and public health spheres, the melody of “doing stuff” echoes more vividly, ensuring that the embers within us continue to burn bright, igniting a path towards a life truly well-lived.

Psychoneuroimmunology

In the grand tapestry of health psychology’s evolution, a new thread is being woven—the intricate realm of psychoneuroimmunology. This burgeoning subfield holds the promise of reshaping health care’s landscape and illuminating the interplay between the mind, body, and disease. Psychoneuroimmunology, an interdisciplinary symphony, orchestrates the dance of the brain, psychosocial variables like thoughts and behaviors, the intricate choreography of the immune and endocrine systems, and the unfolding drama of disease development and progression.

As the symphony of health unfolds, the melodies of measurement have grown richer. Technological leaps in assessing brain structure and function harmonize with newfound abilities to quantify immune system responses, such as cytokines. This synergy of measurement lays the foundation for documenting the intricate dance between mind and body, revealing the profound interconnections that shape our well-being.

Within this symphony, psychoneuroimmunology investigates captivating melodies—studies that illuminate the role of psychological stress in influencing wound healing, disease emergence, and the body’s response to immunization. As the threads of research unravel, the intricate notes unveil the interplay between psychological states and physiological responses, casting new light on the profound influence of the mind on the body’s healing journey.

Optimism and perceptions of control, those luminous notes of positivity, also find their resonance in this symphony. Their presence is felt in the realm of endocrine responses and the dance of disease progression. As the science of psychoneuroimmunology expands, it draws us into a deeper understanding of how our perceptions and attitudes mold our physiological reality, sculpting the path of health and illness.

Envisioning the future, the symphony of psychoneuroimmunology stands poised to transform health care’s narrative. It beckons us to explore uncharted territories, to embrace the exquisite dance of mind and body, and to embrace a more holistic understanding of health. In this harmonious partnership, health psychology’s future shines ever brighter, casting its luminous light on the intricacies of well-being and guiding us towards a symphony of health that resonates within us all.

Summary

In the realm of health psychology, the journey towards holistic well-being begins—a journey that navigates the intricate interplay between psychosocial factors and traditional health outcomes. Rooted in the biopsychosocial model, health psychology extends its branches across various disciplines, crafting an interdisciplinary fabric that weaves psychology, epidemiology, and health promotion into a harmonious tapestry.

Imagine the story of an elderly grandmother who arrives at the emergency department with a heart attack—a tale that encapsulates the essence of health psychology’s transformative role. Traditionally, a biomedical lens would focus solely on the physiological aspects, offering medical interventions like angioplasty or bypass surgery. However, the symphony of health psychology paints a richer narrative. A multidisciplinary team, led by a health psychologist, converges to offer comprehensive care. The heart’s recovery becomes not just a matter of medical procedures, but a harmonious melody orchestrated by various professionals—a cardiologist, a dietician, an exercise physiologist, a social worker, and even a chaplain. Together, they blend medical expertise with psychological support, weaving social connections and meaning into the healing process.

In this vision, the grandmother’s journey transcends physical recovery. The chaplain offers solace and purpose, the psychologist empowers her with cognitive tools, the exercise physiologist guides her towards strength, and the dietician crafts a nourishing path. The symphony of health psychology resonates with her, instilling a sense of self-efficacy and fostering positive expectations for her future. The tale becomes not just about the heart’s healing, but the revitalization of her entire being.

As health psychology unfolds, it shapes not only individual lives but the broader landscape of health care. Advocacy for parity between physical and mental health care gains momentum, and policy changes seek to embrace the full spectrum of well-being. The symphony of psychoneuroimmunology emerges, revealing the intricate connections between mind and body, inviting us to explore the profound links that underlie health and disease.

In this journey, health psychology stands at the crossroads of disciplines, an illuminating guide towards a holistic vision of health. With each note it strikes, with each thread it weaves, health psychology invites us to embrace a future where well-being is not just a matter of physical health, but a symphony that encompasses the mind, body, and soul.

In envisioning a biopsychosocial health-care system, the story of the elderly grandmother takes on a different course—one where prevention is the cornerstone, and well-being is nurtured across a lifetime. Imagine a world where her journey begins with support to quit smoking during her first pregnancy, creating a ripple effect that benefits both her and her child. Knowledge and strategies for exercise and nutrition become accessible, shaping her family’s heart-healthy lifestyle. Her place of worship becomes a hub of holistic support, fostering healthy living practices. With diabetes prevented and heart disease averted, her elderly years are characterized by vitality and engagement.

While this depiction may seem utopian, it underscores a crucial reality: health is shaped by a complex interplay of factors, and behavior change is a challenging journey. Health psychologists are steadfast in their pursuit of strategies to promote health behaviors while enhancing quality of life. They delve into the intricate relationships between biology, psychology, and society, continuously unraveling the mysteries of health and disease. These efforts aren’t just for individuals; they extend to communities and the healthcare system itself.

The American health-care landscape is fraught with challenges, but the integration of health psychology and other health promotion disciplines offers a glimmer of hope. As Americans embrace healthier lifestyles, the tide against obesity, diabetes, and premature death could turn. The demand for costly medical interventions might wane, making insurance more affordable and accessible. Medications could become less of a substitute for health behaviors, as wellness takes center stage. The impact reverberates not just in individual lives, but in the fabric of the healthcare system and the well-being of communities.

In this tapestry of change, health psychologists stand as guides, weaving the threads of biology, psychology, and society into a narrative of holistic well-being. Their work transcends the individual, shaping a future where health is a shared journey, and the symphony of biopsychosocial harmony resonates across generations.

References:

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
2. Andrykowski, M. A., & Manne, S. L. (2006). Are psychological interventions effective and accepted by cancer patients? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 32, 93–97.
3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education and Behavior, 31, 143–164.
5. Barefoot, J. C., Brummett, B. H., Helms, M. J., Mark, D. B, Siegler, I. C., & Williams, R. B. (2000). Depressive symptoms and survival of patients with coronary artery disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 790–795.
6. Becker, M. H. (1974). The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Education Monograph, 2(4), 324–473.
7. Belanger, C. F., Hennekens, C. H., Rosner, B., & Speizer, F. (1978). The nurses’ health study. American Journal of Nursing, 78, 1039–1040.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005). Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 1997–2001. MMWR, 54, 625–628.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Overweight and obesity. Retrieved February 20, 2017, from https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/index.html
10. Chodosh, J., Morton, S. C., Mojica, W., Maglione, M., Suttorp, J. J., Hilton, L., et al. (2005). Meta-analysis: Chronic disease self-management programs for older adults. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143, 427–438.
11. Cohen, S. (1988). Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychology, 7, 269–297.
12. Davidson-Moyers, J. (Producer), Grubin, D. (Producer), Markowitz, A. (Producer), & Moyers, B. (Producer). (1993). Healing and the mind [Television series]. New York: Public Affairs Television, Inc.
13. Dusseldorp, E., van Elderen, T., Maes, S., Meulman, J., & Kraaij, V. (1999). A meta-analysis of psychoeducational programs for coronary heart disease patients. Health Psychology, 19, 506–519.
14. Enright, M. F., Resnick, R., DeLeon, P. H., Sciara, A. D., & Tanney, F. (1990). The practice of psychology in hospital settings. American Psychologist, 45, 1059–1065.
15. Ford, F. D., Trestman, R. L., Steinberg, K., Tennen, H., & Allen, S. (2004). Prospective association of anxiety, depressive and additive disorders with high utilization of primary, specialty and emergency medical care. Social Science Medicine, 58, 2145–2151.
16. Friedman, H. S., & Silver, R. C. (Eds.). (2007). Foundations of health psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Friedman, R., Sobel, D., Myers, P., Caudill, M., & Benson, H. (1995). Behavioral medicine, clinical health psychology, and cost offset. Health Psychology, 14, 509–518.
18. Gaus, C. R. (1995). Cardiac Rehabilitation. Clinical Guideline 17. AHCPR Publication # 96-0672.
19. Gerard, C., Michael, K., & Gerard, J. (2005, September). Practice patterns of emergency physicians through the use of simulated patient vignettes: A pilot study. Paper presented at the American College of Emergency Physicians Research Forum, Washington, DC.
20. Glaser, R., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of human stress and immunity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21. Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 35–43.
22. Harrison, J. A., Mullen, P. D., & Green, L. W. (1992). A metaanalysis of studies of the Health Belief Model with adults. Health Education Research, 7, 107–116.
23. Hiroko, K., Nagao, F., Tanaka, Y., Shizu, S., Ohnishi, S. T., & Okumura, K. (2005). Beneficial effects of the Nishino breathing method on immune activity and stress level. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 11, 285–291.
24. Holmes, M. D., Liu, S., Hankinson, S. E., Colditz, G. A., Hunter, D. J., & Willett, W. C. (2004). Dietary carbohydrates, fiber, and breast cancer risk. American Journal of Epidemiology, 159, 732–739.
25. Huckabee, M. (2006, May 8). Time 100: The people who shape our world [Electronic version]. Time, p. 167.
26. Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The Health Belief Model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11, 1–47.
27. Kaplan, R. M. (1994). The Ziggy theorem: Towards an outcomes- focused health psychology. Health Psychology, 13, 451–460.
28. Kaplan, R. M. (2003). The significance of quality of life in healthcare. Quality of Life Research, 1, 3–16.
29. Kirsch, I., & Sapirstein, G. (1998). Listening to Prozac but hearing placebo: A meta-analysis of antidepressant medication. Prevention and Treatment, 1, 3–16.
30. Klaus, M. K., Kennell, J., Berkowitz, G., & Klaus, P. (1992). Maternal assistance and support in labor: Father, nurse, midwife, or doula? Clinical Consultations in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4, 211–217.
31. Lepore, S. J., & Coyne, J. C. (2006). Psychological interventions for distress in cancer patients: A review of reviews. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 32, 85–92.
32. Lorig, K., Mazonson, P., & Holman, H. R. (1993). Evidence suggesting that health education for self-management in patients with chronic arthritis has sustained health benefits while reducing health care costs. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 36, 439–446.
33. Lustman, P. J., Frank, B. L., & McGill, J. B. (1991). Relationship of personality characteristics to glucose regulation in adults with diabetes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 53, 305–312.
34. McClenahan, C., Shevlin, M., Adamson, G., Bennett, C., & O’Neill, B. (2006). Testicular self-examination: A test of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour. Health Education Research. Retrieved February 20, 2017, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16885203
35. Moss, D., McGrady, A., Davies, T. C., & Wickramaseker, I. (2003). Handbook of mind-body medicine for primary care. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Moyers, B. (1993). Healing and the mind. New York: Public Affairs Television, Inc.
37. Oh, K., Hu, F. B., Manson, J. E., Stampfer, M. J., & Willett, W. C. (2005). Dietary fat intake and risk of coronary heart disease in women: 20 years of follow-up of the nurses’ health study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 16, 672–679.
38. Ornish, D., Scherwitz, L. W., Billings, J. H., Gould, W. T., Merritt, T. A., Sparler, S., et al. (1998). Intensive lifestyle changes for reversal of coronary heart disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 2001–2007.
39. Pressman, S. D., Cohen, S., Miller, G. E., Barkin, A., Rabin, B. S., & Treanor, J. J. (2005). Loneliness, social network size, and immunize response to influenza vaccination in college freshmen. Health Psychology, 24, 297–306.
40. Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 19, 276–288.
41. Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997). The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12, 38–48.
42. Richman, L. S., Kubzansky, L., Maselko, J., Kawachi, I., Choo, P., & Bauer, M. (2005). Positive emotion and health: Going beyond the negative. Health Psychology, 24, 422–429.
43. Robles, T. F., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2003). The physiology of marriage: Pathways to health. Physiology & Behavior, 79, 409–416.
44. Sacco, R. L., Benson, R. T., Kargman, D. E., Boden-Albala, B., Tuck, C., Lin, I.-F., et al. (2001). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and ischemic stroke in the elderly: The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2729–2735.
45. Spiegel, D., Bloom, J. R., Kraemer, H. C., & Gottheil, E. (1989). Effect of psychosocial treatment on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The Lancet, 2, 888–891.
46. Winett, R. A., King, A. C., & Altman, D. G. (1989). Health psychology and public health: An integrative approach. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, Inc.

Back to Developmental Psychology