Family violence, an enduring social challenge, has cast a long shadow across history and persists as a pressing issue in contemporary times. Historically, the boundaries of familial privacy rendered many domestic matters exclusive to the realm of the family rather than involving state intervention. However, the emergence of the women’s movement marked a pivotal shift, spotlighting the alarming prevalence of domestic violence and child abuse. This transformative movement paved the way for the enactment of new legislation and catalyzed widespread social action to combat these deeply entrenched issues. More recently, concerns surrounding elder abuse have gained traction, fueled by the spotlight on a handful of highly publicized cases that underscore the urgency of addressing this dimension of family violence.
Family violence, spanning generations and affecting vulnerable members of households, has been inextricably linked with a host of societal afflictions, encompassing delinquency, depression, and substance abuse. This multifaceted challenge transcends social strata and cultural backgrounds, penetrating all social classes and ethnic groups. It is noteworthy, however, that poverty constitutes a significant risk factor, exacerbating the occurrence of family violence within marginalized communities.
As society grapples with the complexities of family violence, it is crucial to acknowledge that this issue carries far-reaching implications. The evolution of awareness, fueled by movements and legislative actions, underscores the shift from a stance of passive acceptance to one of active intervention. Nevertheless, the multifarious nature of family violence calls for continuous vigilance and concerted efforts across societal sectors to break its cycle and forge a path towards safer, healthier family dynamics for all.
Family Violence Definitions
Within the realm of family violence, a spectrum of distressing behaviors and harmful actions manifest, demanding precise definitions to comprehend the gravity of these occurrences. Spousal or partner violence encompasses a continuum of actions, ranging from relatively mild forms of physical aggression like pushing or slapping to the gravest forms of violence, including physical assault and even homicide. This category further encompasses the deeply traumatic act of spousal or partner rape, highlighting the multifaceted nature of harm within intimate relationships.
Child and elder maltreatment, two deeply concerning dimensions of family violence, are classified into distinct categories: intentional acts of commission, involving harmful actions, and acts of omission, involving neglectful inaction. Physical abuse constitutes a form of commission, characterized by deliberate non-accidental acts by adults that lead to physical harm, varying from excessive physical discipline to severe acts causing fractures or even fatalities. On the other hand, physical neglect constitutes a form of omission, embodying the failure to provide essential care or support necessary for the well-being of a child or elderly individual. Instances of neglect encompass insufficient nutrition, abandonment, and the refusal of crucial medical attention.
Sexual abuse, a particularly distressing facet of family violence, pertains to sexual interactions with non-consensual minors or adults for the purpose of sexual gratification. It spans a range of reprehensible acts, including rape, incest, sodomy, oral copulation, fondling, and exhibitionism, all of which inflict profound emotional and psychological damage.
Defining psychological or emotional maltreatment proves to be complex due to its intricate nature. Psychological maltreatment towards children encompasses both acts of omission and commission that inflict immediate or eventual harm on behavioral, cognitive, affective, or physical functioning. This category encompasses actions such as rejection, terrorization, isolation, exploitation, and fostering antisocial or illegal behavior. Illustrative examples include endorsing gang membership and drug use.
Navigating the definitions of various forms of family violence is essential to understanding their underlying dynamics, acknowledging the spectrum of harm inflicted on individuals within familial relationships, and providing a foundation for informed intervention and prevention strategies.
Reports of and responses to maltreatment of children have both changed over time.
The prevalence of various forms of family violence is a concerning reality that demands quantitative assessment to comprehend the extent of harm inflicted upon vulnerable individuals. Child maltreatment prevalence is gauged, in part, through reports to Child Protective Services (CPS), providing a glimpse into the magnitude of the issue. In 1997, CPS received nearly 3 million reports, with approximately 33% of cases substantiated as instances of abuse. This resulted in nearly one million confirmed child victims, predominantly reported for neglect (55%), followed by physical abuse (24%), sexual abuse (13%), emotional maltreatment (6%), medical neglect (2%), and “other” forms (12%), including abandonment and congenital drug addiction. Tragically, between three and five children fall victim to fatal abuse every day in the United States.
The reporting trend of child maltreatment to CPS has shown a significant surge since the late 1970s, with a national increase of 331% between 1976 and 1993. The escalation is attributed to mandatory reporting requirements and heightened public awareness, rather than a proportional increase in maltreatment instances. However, while overall reporting increased, there was a decline in reports related to child sexual abuse between 1995 and 1997. This phenomenon might be associated with growing concerns about false reports, potentially leading to greater skepticism or reluctance to report suspicions. Random sample survey studies, while not without limitations, can provide alternative prevalence estimates, particularly as many incidents go unreported to authorities. Survey data mainly capture physical and sexual abuse, revealing that an estimated 700,000 children encountered severe violent behavior in 1985, with a slight reduction by 1992. Notably, such statistics could still underestimate the problem, as some parents may be hesitant to disclose abusive acts. When directly surveyed, 10- to 16-year-olds revealed that approximately 7.5% experienced at least one instance of physical assault by a family member, with nonfamily assaults being even more frequent (22%).
The prevalence of sexual abuse also varies, contingent on the definitions employed and the retrospective nature of the studies. Community surveys indicate that 38% to 54% of women reported experiencing sexual abuse before age 18, with 12% experiencing abuse before age 12. Nevertheless, interviews with 10- to 16-year-olds showcased a lifetime rate of attempted or completed sexual victimization at 10.5%, notably lower than retrospective studies of adults. Discrepancies in cohorts’ definitions of sexual abuse, along with the retrospective nature of adult reports and the young age of some respondents, might contribute to these variations. Accurately quantifying the prevalence of family violence remains challenging due to the complex interplay of factors impacting disclosure and reporting.
In the realm of legal response, the historical treatment of child maltreatment has undergone a transformation, shifting from a more permissive attitude towards corporal punishment to a recognition of the need for protective measures. In the past, practices like corporal punishment were prevalent within families, schools, and religious institutions, potentially leading today’s standards to classify many past children as victims of child maltreatment. Initial legal interventions primarily targeted nonparental assault and children without parental care. However, a pivotal event in 1875 involving a mistreated child named Mary Ellen in New York marked a turning point, leading to increased state intervention. Leveraging laws originally designed to safeguard animals from maltreatment, advocates managed to have Mary Ellen removed from her abusive home, prompting the establishment of CPS divisions across states to address intrafamilial child maltreatment cases. The 1960s saw the emergence of mandatory reporting laws following C. Henry Kempe’s influential paper on the “battered child syndrome,” necessitating professionals working with children to report suspected abuse.
Child Protective Services (CPS) often serves as the designated agency for receiving and investigating reports of maltreatment within familial, foster care, and daycare settings. In cases of imminent danger, children might be immediately removed from their homes. Disturbingly, children left in abusive households face a substantial likelihood of reinjury (40% to 70%) and even death (up to 5%). If deemed appropriate, services such as substance abuse counseling may be offered to families. If the situation necessitates, or if services are declined, the case may proceed to juvenile court. Juvenile courts possess the authority to retain custody of the child, place them in foster care, or even terminate parental rights, although they lack the power to directly penalize parents.
Assaults against children can also warrant police involvement. In instances of severe intrafamilial or extrafamilial abuse, criminal prosecution may ensue within the criminal justice system. State penal codes outline laws addressing child abuse. While juvenile courts handle a majority of child maltreatment cases, charges of child sexual abuse often result in criminal court actions.
In cases of child sexual abuse, where physical evidence might be lacking, authorities may subject children to repeated interviews or require them to testify in juvenile or criminal courts. The proper methodology for conducting forensic interviews with children and the accuracy of children’s memories have sparked discussions and debates in recent times. Concerns have also been raised about the potential exacerbation of trauma resulting from involvement in forensic interviews and legal proceedings related to child abuse. Such involvement can lead to extended emotional distress for certain children in the short term, and the potential for long-term effects into adulthood is currently being investigated. Innovations in the legal sphere, including testimony through closed-circuit TV and collaborative interviews spanning CPS and police agencies, have been proposed to alleviate the challenges faced by children in these circumstances.
Spousal/Partner Abuse and Elder Maltreatment
Reports of maltreatment of adults are also significant.
The prevalence of partner and elder maltreatment is influenced by whether official reports or random sample surveys are utilized, with the latter suggesting that only a fraction of incidents are reported to authorities. Elder maltreatment reports are particularly low. According to a reputable random sample survey, approximately one out of every six households in the United States experiences nonfatal partner abuse annually, with violent assaults occurring in about 1% of households. Across studies, estimates show that 10% to 30% of women have experienced some form of relationship violence. Incidents of spousal or intimate partner rape vary from 1% to 10% of women reporting that their current husband or romantic partner attempted to coerce them into sexual activity. Marital rape frequently co-occurs with other forms of domestic violence.
In the context of elder maltreatment, one study revealed that out of 1000 elderly individuals surveyed, around 32 had experienced some form of maltreatment. Often, this maltreatment was carried out by a spouse, while adult children of the elderly accounted for one-fifth of the perpetrators. Male caregivers were more prone to perpetrate elder abuse compared to female caregivers. Among elderly individuals, risk factors for abuse or neglect include cognitive or emotional difficulties, deterioration in health, and dementia.
In the realm of domestic violence, the legal response primarily revolves around the criminal justice system. It is noteworthy that this response has evolved relatively recently, driven by tragic stories of domestic abuse and inadequate legal intervention. In response, both state and federal legislation have been enacted to ensure the prosecution of individuals who commit violent acts against others, irrespective of their relationship. This includes eliminating spousal exceptions in rape laws and allowing police to make arrests based on probable cause in cases of misdemeanor domestic violence.
The effectiveness of mandatory arrests as a preventive measure for domestic violence is currently under debate. A study conducted in Minneapolis indicated that mandatory arrests led to a lower recidivism rate of 10%, as opposed to other interventions such as separation periods or advice/mediation, which resulted in a 25% recidivism rate. However, these findings have not been universally consistent, and the impact of mandatory arrests on subsequent domestic violence incidents can vary based on factors like severity and ethnicity. Some experts suggest that police be provided with specialized training to handle domestic violence calls and be allowed “structured discretion” for warrantless arrests in crisis situations.
Recent legal responses also encompass post-police contact interventions, including civil protection orders (restraining orders), dedicated prosecution units, and batterer treatment programs. However, the success of these measures has been mixed. Restraining orders, for example, are often reported as ineffective by victims of domestic abuse. While specialized prosecution units have been established, prosecution rates remain modest. It’s worth noting that some abused partners resort to violence as a defense, claiming years of enduring abuse as justification, even when no immediate violence occurred.
Regarding elder maltreatment, legal responses have traditionally relied on civil litigation. Although legislation addressing elder abuse exists at both state and federal levels, the impact of legal intervention is not as well understood. Social service agencies require specific training to effectively address cases of elder abuse.
As public awareness of family violence continues to grow, prevalence estimates and legal interventions may continue to evolve. The prevention of family violence remains a paramount societal objective.
- Briere, J., Berliner, L., Bulkley, J., Jenny, Coo & Reid, T. (1995). The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Browne, A. (1993). Violence against women by male partners: Prevalence, outcomes, and policy implications. American Psychologist, 48, 1077-1087.
- Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G . (Eds.). (1996). Do arrests and restraining orders work? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Fagen, J. & Browne, A. (1994). Violence between spouses and intimates: Physical aggression between men and women in intimate relationships. In A. J, Reiss Jr. & J, A . Roth (Eds.) , Understanding and preventing violence: Vol. 3. Social influences (pp. 115-292). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Garner, J. & Fagen, J. (1997). Victims of domestic violence. In R. C. Davis. A. J. Lurigio. & w. G. Skogan (Eds.) , Victims of crime (pp. 53-85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Goodman, G. S., Emery, R., & Haugaard, J. (1997). Developmental psychology and the law: Divorce, child maltreatment, foster care, and adoption. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & I. Sigel & A. Renninger (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology in practice (pp. 775- 874). New York: Wiley.
- Kaplan, S. (Ed.). (1996). Family violence: A clinical and legal guide. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
- Kapp, M. B. (1995). Elder mistreatment: Legal interventions and policy uncertainties. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 365-380.
- Kempe, C. H., Silverman, E, Steele, Boo Droegemueller, W. , & Silver. H. (1962). Battered child syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association, 181, 1 7-24.
- Ohlin, L., & Tonry, M. (Eds.). (1989) . Family violence. Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. II). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Schuller, R. A. , & Hastings, P. A. (1996). Trials of battered women who kill: The impact of alternative forms of expert evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 167-187.
- Walker, L. E. A. ( 1996). Assessment of abusive family spousal relationships. In E W. Kaslow (Ed.) , Handbook of relational diagnosis and dysfunctional family patterns (pp. 338-356). New York: Wiley.
Back to Developmental Psychology