Disorders

Disorders in school psychology represent a critical facet of the broader educational experience, encompassing a diverse range of conditions that can influence a student’s academic and social journey. This article provides a thorough examination of various psychological disorders prevalent in school-aged individuals, ranging from widely recognized issues like Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Autism Spectrum Disorders to more niche concerns such as Selective Mutism and Reactive Attachment Disorder. Utilizing authoritative resources like the DSM-IV as a diagnostic reference, the discussion emphasizes the essential contributions of school psychologists. Their knowledge and interventions are instrumental in both recognizing these disorders and implementing evidence-based strategies, thereby cultivating an educational environment that is supportive and adaptive to all students’ needs.

Introduction

The field of school psychology is paramount in understanding and addressing the various psychological and emotional needs of students. Disorders in school psychology are diverse, each presenting its unique challenges that can considerably influence a student’s experience in the academic environment (Kearney, C., & Albano, A., 2000). While some disorders, such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, primarily affect attention span and impulse control, others like Separation Anxiety Disorder can impact a child’s capacity to adapt and feel secure within the school setting.

Recognizing and addressing these disorders is not just the responsibility of educators and school psychologists; parents and caregivers also play a crucial role. Their collaboration ensures that students receive the necessary support and interventions tailored to their unique needs (Harrison, J. R., Vannest, K., & Reynolds, C., 2011). This article offers a comprehensive overview of the myriad disorders students may grapple with during their educational journey. Through a nuanced exploration of their characteristics, etiology, and potential interventions, stakeholders in the educational realm can better position themselves to foster a supportive and effective learning environment for all students (Smith, J., 2022).

Disorders Classification and Diagnostic Tools

The identification and classification of disorders in the context of school psychology are pivotal to providing appropriate interventions and support. Central to this process is the use of diagnostic tools that are both valid and reliable. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) has been a cornerstone in psychiatric and psychological diagnostic procedures for several decades (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1994). While it has been succeeded by later editions, its significance in shaping the diagnostic landscape cannot be understated.

The DSM-IV offers a comprehensive classification system for a multitude of disorders, ranging from mood disorders like Depression and Bipolar Disorder to learning disorders such as Dyslexia. Beyond mere categorization, the manual offers diagnostic criteria, which are particularly beneficial for clinicians in distinguishing one disorder from another (Silverman & Hinshaw, 2008). For instance, while both Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) might present disruptive behaviors, the underlying causes, manifestations, and recommended interventions for each differ considerably.

Moreover, in school settings, specific standardized assessments and observational tools are employed alongside the DSM guidelines. These tools, such as behavioral checklists and rating scales, offer a more nuanced perspective, especially considering the unique dynamics of an educational environment (Jimerson, Burns, & VanDerHeyden, 2015). For instance, echolalia – the repetition of noises or phrases – might be observed as a symptom in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Recognizing such behaviors within the classroom and understanding their potential underlying causes is crucial for school psychologists and educators.

However, while diagnostic tools like the DSM-IV provide a structured approach to identifying disorders, they are not without their criticisms. The act of labeling might inadvertently lead to stigmatization or the adoption of a deficit-focused viewpoint, which can hinder a holistic understanding of the child (Mash & Barkley, 2003). Thus, a balanced approach, which takes into account both the benefits and potential pitfalls of classification, is essential.

Common Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Neurodevelopmental disorders, as the name suggests, relate to the development of the nervous system. They manifest early in a child’s life and significantly impact their day-to-day functioning, especially in the realms of learning, behavior, and self-control. Such disorders are usually lifelong, and while symptoms might change over time, they often present significant challenges for individuals, families, and educators (Thapar, Pine, Leckman, Scott, Snowling, & Taylor, 2015). This section elucidates several prominent neurodevelopmental disorders commonly encountered in school settings.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

ADHD is characterized by pervasive patterns of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity. Children with ADHD often struggle to stay focused on a single task, are easily distracted, may act without thinking, and might be perceived as “always on the go.” Such behaviors are not only occasional lapses but persistent trends that impede learning and social interactions (Barkley, 2006). In school settings, these students might struggle with organization, following instructions, and completing assignments.

Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD)

ASD is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder that affects social interaction, communication, interests, and behaviors. Manifestations of autism can range from mild to severe, with some children displaying difficulty in understanding social cues, while others might engage in repetitive behaviors like hand-flapping or echolalia. The school environment, with its inherent demand for social interaction and communication, poses specific challenges for students on the spectrum (Lord & Bishop, 2010).

Learning Disabilities (e.g., Dyslexia)

Learning disabilities are neurologically-based processing difficulties that hinder skills like reading, writing, or math. Dyslexia, for instance, is a reading disorder where children might struggle with word recognition, decoding, and spelling. Such difficulties are not reflective of the child’s intelligence but represent a specific difficulty in processing linguistic and symbolic codes (Shaywitz, Morris, & Shaywitz, 2008).

Communication Disorders

These encompass a range of issues related to speech and language. For instance, children might struggle with stuttering, which is a disruption in the flow of speech, or have issues with voice pitch or volume. Others might have language disorders where they face challenges in understanding what they hear or expressing their thoughts (Paul & Norbury, 2012).

Intellectual Disability (formerly known as Mental Retardation)

This disorder is characterized by limitations in intellectual functioning (e.g., reasoning, problem-solving, planning) and adaptive behaviors covering a range of everyday social and practical skills. The onset is before 18 years of age, and it affects both educational and day-to-day functioning (Schalock et al., 2010).

Understanding these disorders and their implications is vital for educators and school psychologists. It helps tailor educational strategies to cater to each child’s unique needs, ensuring they receive an equitable and supportive learning environment. Further, it fosters empathy, reducing the stigma attached to neurodevelopmental disorders.

Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (EBDs) encompass a wide array of difficulties that affect children and adolescents’ emotions, behavior, and overall functioning within the school setting. These disorders can have profound effects on academic performance, social interactions, and long-term outcomes. It’s essential to recognize that these disorders are not just “phases” or typical developmental challenges; they represent severe and persistent patterns of behavior or emotion that can be disruptive or even harmful (Kauffman & Landrum, 2013).

Depression

Childhood and adolescent depression go beyond occasional mood fluctuations. Students with depression might show persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, or apathy, and they may lose interest in activities they once enjoyed. Physiological symptoms, such as changes in appetite and sleep patterns, may also manifest. In the context of school, these students often face difficulties in concentration, leading to declining academic performance (Kovacs, 2009).

Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)

Students with GAD experience extreme, uncontrolled worry about various aspects of daily life, including schoolwork and social interactions. This worry is disproportionate to the actual likelihood or impact of the feared event. Symptoms might include restlessness, irritability, muscle tension, and sleep disturbances. Their constant state of worry can hinder their participation in class activities and social engagements (Beesdo, Knappe, & Pine, 2009).

Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) and Conduct Disorder

ODD is characterized by a persistent pattern of anger, irritability, arguing, defiance, or vindictiveness toward authority figures. Conduct Disorder, on the other hand, involves more severe behavioral problems, like aggression towards people or animals, destruction of property, deceitfulness, or theft. These disorders can be particularly challenging in a school setting, often leading to disciplinary issues (Frick & Nigg, 2012).

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

Children and adolescents can develop PTSD after experiencing or witnessing traumatic events. Symptoms include reliving the event, avoiding reminders of the trauma, and increased arousal symptoms like irritability or sleep difficulties. In school, such students might show a sudden drop in academic performance, extreme emotional reactions, or social withdrawal (Cohen, Mannarino, & Deblinger, 2006).

Adjustment Disorder

While not as severe as PTSD, adjustment disorder arises in response to significant life changes or stressors, such as parental divorce, moving to a new place, or losing a loved one. It’s characterized by emotional and behavioral symptoms that occur in response to the stressor, such as feelings of sadness, anxiety, or even behavioral disturbances. In school, students might display sudden academic difficulties or changes in behavior following the stressor (Casey, 2001).

Recognizing, understanding, and addressing these emotional and behavioral disorders is paramount in school settings. Early identification and intervention can make a significant difference in a child’s academic trajectory and overall well-being. Furthermore, schools play a pivotal role in offering a supportive environment that fosters resilience and growth, especially for students with EBDs (Rutherford, Quinn, & Mathur, 2004).

Less Common, but Significant Disorders

The landscape of disorders in school psychology is vast, and while some are frequently addressed, others, though less common, have profound implications for affected students. This section delves into three such disorders—Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, and Somatoform Disorders—each presenting its own set of challenges and considerations in a school context.

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is characterized by persistent, intrusive thoughts (obsessions) and repetitive behaviors or mental acts (compulsions) that the individual feels driven to perform (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). These behaviors can interfere with a student’s daily routines, social interactions, and academic performance. For instance, a child might repetitively check their backpack, fearing they forgot something, or avoid touching classroom materials due to contamination fears. School-based support strategies may include tailored behavioral interventions, accommodations like extended time for tasks, and collaboration with therapists to ensure consistency in strategies across settings (Storch et al., 2015).

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

Originating from exposure to traumatic events such as physical or sexual abuse, natural disasters, or witnessing violence, PTSD can have severe manifestations in children. Symptoms include re-experiencing the traumatic event, avoidance of stimuli related to the trauma, negative alterations in cognitions and mood, and heightened arousal responses (Cohen et al., 2006). These symptoms can hinder a child’s concentration, social interactions, and overall school performance. School-based interventions often emphasize creating a safe environment, trauma-informed teaching practices, and providing access to counseling services to address trauma-related issues (Jaycox et al., 2002).

Somatoform Disorders

Somatoform disorders encompass conditions where individuals experience physical symptoms, such as pain or fatigue, that lack a clear medical basis, and are believed to arise from psychological factors (Brown, Golding, & Smith, 2010). For students, these disorders can result in frequent visits to the school nurse, consistent complaints about unexplained physical ailments, and significant absences from school. Understanding the psychological underpinnings of these symptoms is crucial, as it can guide interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy techniques, to help students manage and mitigate these symptoms in a school setting (Lipowski, 1988).

In addressing these less common disorders, a comprehensive, compassionate, and individualized approach is vital. By understanding the unique challenges posed by each disorder, schools can create environments that not only accommodate but actively support the success and well-being of affected students.

Disorders Pertaining to Social Interaction and Communication

Social interaction and communication are fundamental for a student’s effective participation and integration into the school environment. Disorders in these areas can create considerable barriers to learning and social connectivity. Two such disorders, Selective Mutism and Adjustment Disorder, while distinct in their presentations and causes, can profoundly impact a student’s daily life in school. This section dives deeper into the intricacies of these disorders, aiming to understand their causes, implications, and the interventions available to assist affected students.

Selective Mutism: Understanding the Silence

Selective Mutism is a complex childhood anxiety disorder characterized by a child’s inability to speak in specific situations, often school settings, despite being able to speak comfortably in more familiar settings (Black & Uhde, 1995).

• Causes: While the exact etiology remains elusive, a combination of factors like genetic predisposition, inhibited temperament, and negative reinforcement patterns contribute to the development and maintenance of the disorder (Kumpulainen, 2002).
• Implications: Students with Selective Mutism may struggle academically due to their inability to participate in verbal activities, ask questions, or collaborate with peers. Socially, the disorder can lead to isolation, peer rejection, and low self-esteem (Cohan, Chavira, & Stein, 2006).
• Interventions: Behavioral interventions, particularly those focusing on shaping and positive reinforcement, have shown promise. Collaborative interventions involving teachers, parents, and therapists, such as the “brave talking” program, can facilitate communication in school (Kotrba, 2015).

2. Adjustment Disorder: A Response to Change

Adjustment Disorder is characterized by emotional and behavioral symptoms that arise within three months of a recognized stressor and often resolve within six months after the stressor is removed (Zelviene & Kazlauskas, 2018).

• Triggers: These can range from family issues (e.g., divorce) to significant life changes like relocating to a new school. The commonality among triggers is the perceived difficulty in coping or adjusting to the new situation (Casey, 2001).
• Symptoms: Students with Adjustment Disorder may display varied symptoms, from depressive feelings and anxiety to behavioral outbursts and withdrawal from social interactions (Strain & Odom, 1986).
• Role of Schools in Support: Schools play a pivotal role in the early identification of symptoms and in providing necessary supports. Intervention strategies may include individual counseling, group therapy, and classroom-based supports to foster adjustment. A proactive school environment, equipped with knowledge about potential stressors and vigilant in observation, can be the first line of defense for students grappling with adjustment challenges (Havik, Bru, & Ertesvåg, 2015).

In understanding disorders related to social interaction and communication, it becomes evident that schools not only play an academic role but are central to students’ socio-emotional well-being. Tailored interventions, understanding, and collaboration among educators and mental health professionals can make a monumental difference in the trajectories of these students’ lives.

Other Disorders and Considerations

In addition to the common neurodevelopmental, emotional, and behavioral disorders previously discussed, there are several other disorders and considerations relevant to the school setting. This section aims to delve into the nuances of pedophilia, mental retardation, as well as fears and phobias within educational environments.

Pedophilia: Safeguarding the Vulnerable

Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent has intense and recurrent sexual urges or fantasies about prepubescent children (Seto, 2008). This topic is crucial to broach in the context of school psychology, given the implications for student safety.

• Understanding: Pedophilia is distinct from child molestation, and not all pedophiles act on their urges. The etiology remains under investigation but is believed to encompass both biological and environmental factors (Blanchard, 2010).
• Implications for School Settings: Schools are entrusted with the safety and well-being of students. Any suspicion or evidence of pedophilic behavior within educational settings necessitates immediate action.
• Safeguarding Measures: Schools should have stringent recruitment processes, regular training sessions on child protection, and protocols for reporting and addressing any suspicions or allegations (Fergusson, Lynskey, & Horwood, 1996).

Mental Retardation: Supporting Unique Learning Needs

Historically termed ‘mental retardation’ and now more commonly referred to as ‘intellectual disability’, this condition involves below-average intellectual function and a lack of skills essential for day-to-day living (Schalock et al., 2010).

• Historical Perspectives: The understanding and treatment of individuals with intellectual disabilities have evolved dramatically. Previously institutionalized or isolated, there’s now a move towards inclusive education and social integration (Turnbull, Turnbull, Wehmeyer, & Shogren, 2013).
• Definitions: Intellectual disability is characterized by IQ scores below 70 and difficulties in adaptive behaviors, such as self-care and communication.
• Classroom Strategies: Differentiated instruction, individualized support plans, and adaptive learning materials can be beneficial. Collaboration between special education teachers, general educators, and parents ensures holistic support (Westling, Fox, & Carter, 2015).

Fears and Phobias in School Settings

Fears and phobias are intense and irrational fears of specific objects, activities, or situations. While some fears are developmentally appropriate, others can hinder a student’s academic and social life (Ollendick & King, 1994).

• Understanding the Nature: While many children have fears, phobias are more intense, persistent, and disruptive. They can originate from traumatic experiences, learned behaviors, or even genetic factors.
• Causes: Various factors, including traumatic events, family history of anxiety, and individual temperament, can contribute to the development of phobias (Muris & Field, 2010).
• School-Based Coping Strategies: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions, exposure techniques, and school counseling can support students in managing and potentially overcoming their phobias (Ollendick, Davis III, & Muris, 2004).

In conclusion, the diversity of disorders and concerns affecting students underscores the importance of a well-rounded, informed approach in school psychology. By understanding and addressing these varied challenges, educational institutions can create supportive, inclusive environments for all students.

Intervention Strategies and School-Based Supports

The school environment serves as a crucial setting for the identification, intervention, and support of students with psychological disorders. Given the large portion of their day that children and adolescents spend at school, educators and school psychologists have an imperative role in ensuring that students with disorders receive the necessary support to succeed academically and socially.

1. Universal Screening and Early Identification: Early detection of disorders or symptoms can facilitate timely intervention and potentially prevent the escalation of symptoms (Fletcher & Vaughn, 2009). Schools can implement universal screenings, which involve assessing all students for signs of disorders, to identify at-risk individuals early on.
2. Individualized Education Programs (IEPs): For students diagnosed with disorders that impact their learning, IEPs can be developed to cater to their specific needs. These legally binding documents outline the services, accommodations, and supports a student will receive to facilitate their learning (Yell, Shriner, & Katsiyannis, 2006).
3. Behavioral Interventions: These strategies are often used for students with behavioral disorders like ADHD or Oppositional Defiant Disorder. They include techniques such as positive reinforcement, time-out, or token economy systems. Behavioral interventions aim to increase desired behaviors and decrease problematic ones (Walker, Ramsey, & Gresham, 2003).
4. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): Especially effective for disorders like anxiety, depression, and OCD, CBT helps students recognize and challenge their maladaptive thought patterns and behaviors. School psychologists can work individually or in group settings to teach students coping and resilience skills (Kendall et al., 2008).
5. Peer Support and Group Interventions: For some students, peer-led groups or counselor-led group sessions can offer a supportive environment where they can discuss their experiences and learn from each other. Such interventions can be particularly helpful for disorders associated with trauma or social isolation (Prinstein, La Greca, Vernberg, & Silverman, 1996).
6. Collaboration with Parents and External Therapists: School psychologists and educators must work in collaboration with parents and external therapists to ensure a cohesive approach in supporting the student. This collaboration ensures that strategies are consistent across settings and that the student receives a comprehensive care approach (Sheridan & Kratochwill, 2007).
7. Professional Development for Educators: Teachers and other school staff must be equipped with the knowledge and skills to understand and support students with disorders. Continuous professional development opportunities can ensure that educators are updated with the latest research and best practices in the field (Brock & Jimerson, 2005).
8. Creating an Inclusive Classroom Environment: Building an environment where all students feel safe, understood, and accepted is crucial. Educators can be trained to use inclusive teaching methods, employ diverse teaching materials, and foster a classroom culture of respect and understanding (Pivik, McComas, & Laflamme, 2002).
9. Crisis Intervention Plans: In situations where a student’s well-being is at immediate risk, schools need to have crisis intervention plans in place. This might include scenarios like severe depressive episodes, suicidal ideation, or manifestations of severe anxiety. Immediate and structured responses can make a significant difference in such scenarios (Brock, Nickerson, Reeves, Jimerson, Lieberman, & Feinberg, 2009).

Incorporating these strategies and supports not only benefits students with disorders but can also promote an inclusive and nurturing environment for all students. By recognizing the diverse needs within the student body, schools can work towards holistic development and well-being for every individual.

Future Directions

The landscape of school psychology and the understanding of disorders within this setting is constantly evolving, driven by advancements in research, changing societal norms, and the increasing recognition of previously understudied disorders. As we look to the future, several trends and areas of potential growth are discernible in the domain of school psychology.

1. Technology-Driven Interventions: With the rapid progression of technology, there is an increasing push to integrate digital tools into therapeutic interventions and supports. Apps and online platforms offer new ways to engage with students, monitor progress, and provide resources and interventions tailored to individual needs (Ebert, Zarski, Christensen, Stikkelbroek, Cuijpers, Berking, & Riper, 2015).
2. Precision Medicine in Psychology: Just as the medical field moves toward individualized treatments based on genetic and biological markers, there’s potential for a more tailored approach in psychological interventions. Understanding the genetic and neurobiological underpinnings of disorders can lead to more precise interventions in school settings (McGorry, Ratheesh, & O’Donoghue, 2018).
3. Cultural Competence: With the increasing diversity in schools, there’s an imperative need to understand disorders and interventions within cultural contexts. Culturally sensitive approaches to diagnosis and intervention will be paramount in offering effective supports (Sue & Sue, 2012).
4. Focus on Well-being and Positive Psychology: Instead of just addressing disorders, there’s a growing trend towards fostering positive mental health, resilience, and overall well-being in students. This proactive approach can potentially reduce the incidence and severity of disorders (Seligman, Ernst, Gillham, Reivich, & Linkins, 2009).
5. Holistic Approaches: Recognizing the interconnectedness of physical health, mental health, and academic success, future directions may emphasize comprehensive wellness programs in schools, addressing nutrition, exercise, sleep, mindfulness, and mental health together (Jennings, Frank, Snowberg, Coccia, & Greenberg, 2013).
6. Improved Training and Professional Development: As the field grows and changes, continuous professional development for school psychologists, counselors, and educators will be essential. This ensures that the latest evidence-based practices are integrated into school settings (Skalski, Minke, Rossen, Cowan, & Kelly, 2017).
7. Policy and Advocacy: There will likely be a continued push for policies that support mental health initiatives in schools, recognizing the significant impact of psychological well-being on academic outcomes and long-term life success (Weist, Evans, & Lever, 2003).

The future of disorders in school psychology holds promise as emerging research and practices aim to create more inclusive, effective, and holistic educational environments. As the field continues to evolve, the central tenet remains: to support and uplift every student, ensuring they have the tools and resources to thrive.

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). APA.
2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3. Barkley, R. A. (2006). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
4. Beesdo, K., Knappe, S., & Pine, D. S. (2009). Anxiety and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: Developmental issues and implications for DSM-V. Psychiatric Clinics, 32(3), 483-524.
5. Black, B., & Uhde, T. W. (1995). Psychiatric characteristics of children with selective mutism: A pilot study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(7), 847-856.
6. Blanchard, R. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. Archives of sexual behavior, 39(2), 304-316.
7. Brock, M. A., & Jimerson, S. R. (2005). School crisis interventions: Strategies for addressing the consequences of crisis events. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(2), 99-104.
8. Brock, P. W., Nickerson, A. B., Reeves, M. A., Jimerson, S. R., Lieberman, R. A., & Feinberg, T. A. (2009). School crisis prevention and intervention: The PREPaRE model. National Association of School Psychologists.
9. Brown, R. J., Golding, J., & Smith, G. R. (2010). Psychogenic conversion disorder in childhood: A systematic review of the English language literature. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52(2), e78-e86.
10. Casey, P. (2001). Adjustment disorder: New developments. Current Psychiatry Reports, 3(4), 309-314.
11. Casey, R. J. (2001). Emotional competence in children with externalizing and internalizing disorders. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 586-603). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Cohan, S. L., Chavira, D. A., & Stein, M. B. (2006). Practitioner review: Psychosocial interventions for children with selective mutism: A critical evaluation of the literature from 1990–2005. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(11), 1085-1097.
13. Cohen, J. A., Mannarino, A. P., & Deblinger, E. (2006). Treating trauma and traumatic grief in children and adolescents. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14. Ebert, D. D., Zarski, A. C., Christensen, H., Stikkelbroek, Y., Cuijpers, P., Berking, M., & Riper, H. (2015). Internet and computer-based cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression in youth: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled outcome trials. PloS one, 10(3), e0119895.
15. Fergusson, D. M., Lynskey, M. T., & Horwood, L. J. (1996). Childhood sexual abuse and psychiatric disorder in young adulthood: II. Psychiatric outcomes of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(10), 1365-1374.
16. Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30-37.
17. Frick, P. J., & Nigg, J. T. (2012). Current issues in the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 77-107.
18. Harrison, J. R., Vannest, K., & Reynolds, C. (2011). Behavioral Interventions in Schools: Evidence-based Positive Strategies. American Psychological Association.
19. Havik, T., Bru, E., & Ertesvåg, S. K. (2015). School factors associated with school refusal and truancy related reasons for school non-attendance. Social Psychology of Education, 18(2), 221-240.
20. Jaycox, L. H., Stein, B. D., Kataoka, S. H., Wong, M., Fink, A., Escudero, P., & Zaragoza, C. (2002). Violence exposure, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depressive symptoms among recent immigrant schoolchildren. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(9), 1104-1110.
21. Jennings, P. A., Frank, J. L., Snowberg, K. E., Coccia, M. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2013). Improving classroom learning environments by Cultivating Awareness and Resilience in Education (CARE): Results of a randomized controlled trial. School psychology quarterly, 28(4), 374.
22. Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2015). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support. Springer.
23. Kauffman, J. M., & Landrum, T. J. (2013). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
24. Kearney, C., & Albano, A. (2000). When Children Refuse School: A Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Approach: Therapist Guide. Oxford University Press.
25. Kendall, P. C., Choudhury, M., Hudson, J., & Webb, A. (2008). The CAT project manual: For the cognitive behavioral treatment of anxious adolescents. Workbook Publishing.
26. Kotrba, A. (2015). Selective mutism in our own words: Experiences in childhood and adulthood. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
27. Kovacs, M. (2009). Depressive disorders in childhood and adolescence. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Assessment of childhood disorders (pp. 277-343). New York, NY: Guilford.
28. Kumpulainen, K. (2002). Phenomenology and treatment of selective mutism. CNS Drugs, 16(3), 175-180.
29. Lipowski, Z. J. (1988). Somatization: The concept and its clinical application. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 145(11), 1358-1368.
30. Lord, C., & Bishop, S. L. (2010). Autism spectrum disorders: Diagnosis, prevalence, and services for children and families. Social Policy Report, 24(2), 1-21.
31. Mash, E. J., & Barkley, R. A. (2003). Child psychopathology. Guilford Press.
32. McGorry, P. D., Ratheesh, A., & O’Donoghue, B. (2018). Early intervention—an implementation challenge for 21st century mental health care. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(6), 545-546.
33. Muris, P., & Field, A. P. (2010). The role of verbal threat information in the development of childhood fear. “Beware the Jabberwock!” Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13(2), 129-150.
34. Ollendick, T. H., Davis III, T. E., & Muris, P. (2004). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for fears and phobias in children: Recent advances. Current Psychiatry Reports, 6(2), 115-120.
35. Ollendick, T. H., & King, N. J. (1994). Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of internalizing problems in children: the practices of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 14(6), 603-625.
36. Paul, R., & Norbury, C. F. (2012). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and communicating (4th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences.
37. Pivik, J., McComas, J., & Laflamme, M. (2002). Barriers and facilitators to inclusive education. Exceptional Children, 69(1), 97-107.
38. Prinstein, M. J., La Greca, A. M., Vernberg, E. M., & Silverman, W. K. (1996). Children’s coping assistance: How parents, teachers, and friends help children cope after a natural disaster. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25(4), 463-475.
39. Rutherford, R. B., Jr., Quinn, M. M., & Mathur, S. R. (2004). Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40. Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M., … & Yeager, M. H. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
41. Seligman, M. E., Ernst, R. M., Gillham, J., Reivich, K., & Linkins, M. (2009). Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 293-311.
42. Seto, M. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. American Psychological Association.
43. Shaywitz, S. E., Morris, R., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2008). The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 451-475.
44. Sheridan, S. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2007). Conjoint behavioral consultation: Promoting family–school connections and interventions. Springer Science & Business Media.
45. Silverman, W. K., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2008). The second special issue on evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents: A 10-year update. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(1), 1-7.
46. Skalski, A. K., Minke, K. M., Rossen, E., Cowan, K. C., & Kelly, J. (2017). NASP Practice Model Implementation Guide. National Association of School Psychologists.
47. Smith, J. (2022). Understanding Disorders in School Settings. Journal of School Psychology, 25(2), 104-119.
48. Strain, P. S., & Odom, S. L. (1986). Peer social initiations: Effective intervention for social skill development of exceptional learners. Exceptional Children, 52(6), 543-552.
49. Storch, E. A., Lewin, A. B., De Nadai, A. S., & Murphy, T. K. (2015). Defining treatment response and remission in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A signal detection analysis of the Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 54(7), 545-552.
50. Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2012). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
51. Thapar, A., Pine, D. S., Leckman, J. F., Scott, S., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, E. A. (2015). Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry. John Wiley & Sons.
52. Turnbull, A., Turnbull, R., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2013). Exceptional lives: Special education in today’s schools. Pearson Education.
53. Walker, H. M., Ramsey, E., & Gresham, F. M. (2003). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
54. Weist, M. D., Evans, S. W., & Lever, N. A. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of school mental health: Advancing practice and research. Springer Science & Business Media.
55. Westling, D. L., Fox, L., & Carter, E. W. (2015). Teaching students with severe disabilities. Pearson.
56. Yell, M. L., Shriner, J. G., & Katsiyannis, A. (2006). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 and IDEA regulations of 2006: Implications for educators, administrators, and teacher trainers. Focus on Exceptional Children, 39(1), 1.
57. Zelviene, P., & Kazlauskas, E. (2018). Adjustment disorder: Current perspectives. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 14, 375.