Multicultural issues in school psychology encompass a vast array of topics, central to which are the integration of diverse cultural experiences, understanding, and effective communication within the educational context. This article delves into the multifaceted realm of multicultural education, cross-cultural assessment, and consultation, illustrating the evolving nature and significance of these concepts in contemporary school settings. Emphasizing the vital role of cultural competence, the discourse underscores the necessity for school psychologists to engage in consistent self-reflection, learning, and adaptation to cater to the needs of a diverse student population. Through a combination of historical contexts, challenges, and best practices, this piece provides a comprehensive examination of multicultural considerations essential for any professional in the field of school psychology.
Introduction
In the dynamically evolving landscape of modern education, understanding the interplay of culture within the domain of school psychology has become paramount (Sue & Sue, 2016). As student populations in schools grow increasingly diverse, so does the need to address the multitude of cultural backgrounds, beliefs, and practices that come into play. Multicultural issues in school psychology do not just concern race or ethnicity but envelop a broader spectrum, including language, religion, socioeconomic status, gender, and more (Ortiz & Jani, 2010).
Central to this discourse is the concept of cultural competence, which underscores the ability of professionals to effectively interact with individuals from diverse backgrounds. This competence extends beyond mere awareness or knowledge; it involves the ability to apply understanding in tangible, constructive ways within educational settings (Rogers, 2012). In the realm of school psychology, this often manifests in practices like cross-cultural assessment, consultation, and fostering multicultural education.
The imperatives of addressing multicultural issues are manifold. Not only do they contribute to equity and inclusivity, but they also pave the way for holistic academic and social-emotional development for all students. By recognizing and addressing these cultural intricacies, school psychologists are better equipped to create environments that respect, appreciate, and harness the power of diversity (Castillo, 2014).
Historical Context
The recognition and exploration of multicultural issues within the domain of school psychology can be traced back to a series of broader sociopolitical movements that have shaped modern psychology. This historical context underscores the necessity and urgency of addressing these issues.
Post World War II Era
In the aftermath of World War II, there was a notable increase in immigrant populations in the United States, leading to diverse student demographics in schools (Ingraham, 2000). This ushered in new challenges for school psychologists, as they were tasked with addressing the needs of students from varying cultural backgrounds, many of whom faced traumatic experiences and cultural dislocation.
Civil Rights Movement
The Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, aimed at ending racial segregation and discrimination, significantly influenced the field of psychology. This era saw an increased emphasis on understanding and advocating for the rights of minorities and acknowledging the biases inherent in many psychological assessments and interventions. Hernandez and McDowell (1987) pointed out that many standardized tests, widely used in schools, were culturally biased, often leading to the misdiagnosis of students from non-majority backgrounds.
Establishment of Division 45
In 1986, the American Psychological Association (APA) recognized the need to address multicultural concerns in psychology by establishing Division 45, the Society for the Psychological Study of Culture, Ethnicity, and Race. This division emphasized the importance of incorporating cultural considerations in research, practice, and policy (Hall & Maramba, 2001).
21st Century and Globalization
As the world became more interconnected through globalization, schools became microcosms of global communities, with students from diverse ethnic, religious, linguistic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. This has necessitated a more nuanced understanding of multicultural issues. As Graham (2006) suggested, school psychologists are now not only tasked with understanding cultural differences but also with fostering environments that are both inclusive and equitable for all students.
Understanding this historical trajectory is imperative. It not only offers insight into the evolving nature of school psychology in response to societal changes but also highlights the ongoing need to refine and adapt practices to better serve increasingly diverse student populations.
Multicultural Education
Multicultural education is a transformative movement in education that not only addresses the needs of minority students, but also seeks to reform the structures, curricula, and teaching practices of institutions to accommodate diverse perspectives and foster global citizenship. Its implementation in schools is pivotal in promoting an inclusive environment that acknowledges and celebrates differences, while also challenging biases and prejudices.
Origins and Evolution
The advent of multicultural education stemmed from civil rights movements and the increasing recognition of the need to include the experiences, cultures, and contributions of diverse groups in educational curricula (Banks, 1993). Over the years, the scope of multicultural education has expanded, shifting from mere inclusion to a comprehensive restructuring of education to ensure equity and justice for all students.
Key Principles
At its core, multicultural education emphasizes the value of cultural diversity, the promotion of social justice, and the necessity of ensuring equal educational opportunities for all (Nieto & Bode, 2008). It also advocates for curricular reform, the integration of diverse teaching strategies, and the preparation of teachers to effectively engage with students from various cultural backgrounds.
Impact on Student Outcomes
Studies have demonstrated that when students see their cultures and histories represented in the curriculum, they often exhibit increased academic achievement and motivation. Additionally, multicultural education benefits not just minority students but all students by fostering critical thinking, flexibility, and adaptability in an interconnected world (Gay, 2010).
Challenges and Critiques
Despite its importance, the integration of multicultural education is not without challenges. Some critics argue that it may lead to the dilution of academic standards or that it emphasizes differences at the expense of shared national identity (Schlesinger, 1998). Furthermore, the practical implementation of multicultural principles in curricula can be challenging due to varying interpretations of what constitutes ‘multicultural content.’
Role of School Psychologists
As advocates for student well-being, school psychologists play a crucial role in the effective implementation of multicultural education. They can offer insights into how cultural factors influence learning and behavior, provide resources for culturally responsive teaching practices, and collaborate with educators to design interventions that consider the diverse needs of students (Newell, Nastasi, & Hatzichristou, 2003).
In sum, multicultural education serves as a bedrock for establishing schools that are inclusive, equitable, and responsive to the diverse needs of their student populations. As the world continues to evolve, the tenets of multicultural education will remain critical in preparing students for a globalized world.
Cross-Cultural Assessment
Cross-cultural assessment refers to the process of understanding and interpreting an individual’s psychological characteristics, skills, abilities, or behaviors within the context of their cultural background. As global migration rates surge and classrooms grow more diverse, cross-cultural assessment becomes pivotal in ensuring that evaluations are valid, reliable, and free from cultural bias.
The Need for Cross-Cultural Assessment
Traditional assessment tools have historically been developed based on Western norms and may not be entirely valid for individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds. Misinterpretations of scores can lead to inaccurate diagnoses, and in school settings, this could result in inappropriate placement or interventions (Rogoff, 2003).
Cultural Bias in Assessments
Tests may contain language, content, or concepts unfamiliar to students from different cultural backgrounds. Such cultural biases can lead to misinterpretation of a student’s abilities, often overlooking their true potential or specific needs (Helms, 2006).
Strategies for Culturally Responsive Assessment
Culturally responsive assessment begins with understanding the cultural background of the student. This might include interviews, observations, and gathering data on their previous educational experiences. Assessors can also utilize culturally adapted versions of standardized tests, though these should be chosen and interpreted with caution. Dynamic assessment, which considers a student’s learning potential and process rather than static knowledge, has also been promoted as a culturally sensitive approach (Lidz & Peña, 2009).
Challenges in Cross-Cultural Assessment
While the need for culturally sensitive assessments is widely acknowledged, several challenges persist. These include the limited availability of culturally adapted test versions, potential language barriers, and the need for extensive training for professionals to competently conduct and interpret cross-cultural assessments (Foxcroft, 2004).
The Role of School Psychologists
School psychologists stand at the forefront of advocating for and conducting cross-cultural assessments. They are tasked with ensuring that the assessment process considers a student’s linguistic abilities, cultural norms, and educational background. Moreover, they play a crucial role in educating teachers and other staff about the importance of cultural sensitivity in both assessment and instruction (Samson, & Ojanen, 2019).
In essence, cross-cultural assessment is a nuanced process that requires keen understanding and sensitivity towards cultural differences. When conducted appropriately, it provides a comprehensive, valid, and fair representation of a student’s abilities, paving the way for tailored interventions and support.
Cross-Cultural Consultation
Cross-cultural consultation represents an imperative facet of school psychology, emphasizing the significance of cultural understanding and adaptability when collaborating with students, families, and staff from diverse backgrounds. As the demographic profile of schools transforms due to globalization and migration patterns, the ability of school psychologists to navigate these cultural intersections becomes crucial.
The Importance of Cross-Cultural Consultation
At its core, cross-cultural consultation is about forging effective, respectful partnerships that value the unique cultural perspectives and experiences of all stakeholders involved (Lee, 2013). It extends beyond merely recognizing cultural differences, focusing on how these differences shape students’ educational experiences and needs.
Cultural Humility in Consultation
One of the foundational principles of cross-cultural consultation is cultural humility, which involves an ongoing process of self-reflection and self-critique regarding one’s own cultural biases and assumptions. It demands a genuine openness to the worldviews of others without the imposition of dominant cultural narratives (Hook, Davis, Owen, Worthington, & Utsey, 2013).
Techniques for Effective Cross-Cultural Consultation:
-
- Active Listening: Listening without judgment and being genuinely open to understanding the concerns, values, and beliefs of others.
- Collaborative Problem Solving: Recognizing that culturally informed solutions may differ from dominant cultural norms, and partnering with families and students to co-create solutions.
- Utilizing Cultural Brokers: Engaging with community members who can act as bridges between the school and families, facilitating mutual understanding (Truscott, Kreskey, Bolling, Psimas, Graybill, Albritton, & Schwartz, 2012).
Challenges in Cross-Cultural Consultation
Among the challenges faced in this realm are potential language barriers, differing perceptions of the role of school psychologists, and reconciling conflicting cultural values or practices with established school norms (Singh & Dutta, 2010).
The Role of School Psychologists
As with cross-cultural assessment, school psychologists are instrumental in pioneering and promoting cross-cultural consultation practices. Their expertise and training place them in a pivotal role, acting as liaisons between schools and culturally diverse communities, ensuring that the educational environment is inclusive and responsive to the needs of all students (Newell, Nastasi, Hatzichristou, Jones, Schanding, & Yetter, 2010).
Cross-cultural consultation underscores the evolving nature of school psychology. By cultivating collaborative relationships rooted in mutual respect and understanding, it ensures that students from diverse backgrounds are given the optimal environment to succeed academically and socio-emotionally.
Cultural Competence in School Psychology
In today’s globally interconnected society, school psychologists play a pivotal role in ensuring that educational environments cater to the diverse cultural, linguistic, and socio-economic backgrounds of students. Cultivating cultural competence within the realm of school psychology is not only an ethical imperative but is also essential for providing holistic and effective support to all students and their families.
Defining Cultural Competence
Cultural competence is characterized by an individual’s or institution’s ability to interact effectively with people of different cultures. It comprises four key components: awareness of one’s own cultural worldview, attitude towards cultural differences, knowledge of different cultural practices and worldviews, and cross-cultural skills (Sue & Sue, 2016).
The Necessity for Cultural Competence in Schools
With the increasing diversification of student populations, there’s an urgent need to address the myriad of cultural influences that intersect within the classroom. Cultural competence in school psychology ensures that interventions, assessments, and consultations are tailored to consider these diverse backgrounds, thus maximizing their effectiveness (Castillo, 2013).
Developing Cultural Competence
Continuous professional development and education are key. This includes:
- Cultural Self-awareness: Recognizing one’s own biases, stereotypes, and preconceptions.
- Cultural Knowledge: Educating oneself about different cultural norms, values, and practices.
- Skill Development: Acquiring strategies and techniques for cross-cultural communication and intervention (Rogers-Sirin, Eseda, & Sirin, 2014).
Challenges in Achieving Cultural Competence: Some challenges faced by school psychologists include:
- Navigating cultural nuances in student behavior, which might be misinterpreted based on one’s own cultural lens.
- The potential for cultural bias in standardized assessments.
- Balancing respect for cultural practices while advocating for students’ rights within the educational system (Goforth, 2015).
Best Practices:
- Seeking Supervision and Peer Feedback: Ensuring accountability and ongoing growth by collaborating with peers and seeking mentorship.
- Engaging with Multicultural Communities: Building genuine relationships with the diverse communities represented in schools.
- Regularly Updating Skills and Knowledge: As cultural landscapes evolve, so should the knowledge and skills of the school psychologist.
The imperative for cultural competence is clear: it allows school psychologists to provide more precise, effective, and empathetic support. As schools become increasingly multicultural, the onus is on these professionals to keep pace, ensuring every student, irrespective of their background, has the best opportunity to thrive.
Challenges and Contemporary Issues in Multicultural School Psychology
As the field of school psychology embraces the importance of multicultural competencies, it faces a myriad of challenges and evolving issues in its journey towards genuinely inclusive practices. From the varying cultural norms within diverse communities to the complex geopolitical landscapes affecting immigrant and refugee student populations, today’s school psychologists must navigate an intricate web of cultural considerations.
Diversity in Assessment Tools
One of the chief concerns in the multicultural context is the potential cultural bias inherent in standardized assessment tools. Many of these tools were developed with a particular cultural group in mind, often not reflecting the diverse student populations found in today’s schools. This raises questions about the validity of assessment results for students from diverse backgrounds (Rhodes, Ochoa, & Ortiz, 2005).
Intersecting Identities and Microaggressions
Modern school settings are a melting pot of intersecting identities—race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, socio-economic status, and more. Students may face microaggressions or subtle discriminatory comments/actions, which can cumulatively have significant psychological effects. Understanding and addressing these nuances is a critical aspect of the multicultural school psychologist’s role (Sue et al., 2007).
Language Barriers
As global migration patterns continue to change, schools increasingly encounter students who speak different languages. This linguistic diversity presents both a challenge in terms of communication and assessment, as well as an opportunity to embrace and integrate these languages into the school’s cultural fabric (Samway & McKeon, 2007).
Acculturation Stress
Immigrant and refugee students often grapple with the challenges of adapting to a new cultural environment, which can lead to acculturation stress. This stress can manifest in various ways, from academic struggles to behavioral issues, requiring school psychologists to be adept at identifying and addressing these unique challenges (Berry, Phinney, Sam, & Vedder, 2006).
Advocacy for Multicultural Education
Beyond their role in direct student support, school psychologists are also instrumental in advocating for broader systemic changes. Pushing for a curriculum that represents diverse voices, histories, and perspectives is paramount. Furthermore, training for teachers and staff in cultural sensitivity and anti-bias education is also essential (Banks & Banks, 2010).
Lack of Diverse Representation
The field of school psychology itself has grappled with a lack of diversity among practitioners. Efforts to recruit and retain diverse professionals are crucial to ensure that the field genuinely understands and reflects the communities it serves (Proctor & Romano, 2016).
While the path to genuine multicultural competence in school psychology is filled with challenges, it’s also ripe with opportunities. By acknowledging, confronting, and addressing these challenges, school psychologists can play a transformative role in creating educational environments that are inclusive, affirming, and conducive to the success of every student.
Best Practices and Recommendations in Multicultural School Psychology
Given the multifaceted nature of multicultural issues in school psychology, it’s imperative to highlight best practices and recommendations to ensure that every student feels valued, understood, and supported. These practices are not only ethically sound but also optimize the educational and psychosocial outcomes for diverse student populations.
- Cultural Responsiveness: Above all, school psychologists should endeavor to be culturally responsive, embracing an attitude of openness, curiosity, and respect toward all cultures and their unique attributes. By seeking continuous education on different cultures and being self-reflective about personal biases, psychologists can ensure their approach is respectful and effective (Gay, 2010).
- Collaboration with Multilingual Professionals: When language barriers exist, it’s essential to collaborate with multilingual professionals. This might involve co-assessing with bilingual school psychologists or utilizing interpreters to ensure accurate and culturally sensitive communications (Artiles & Ortiz, 2002).
- Utilize Culturally Appropriate Assessment Tools: Recognizing that many standard assessment tools may have cultural biases, it’s crucial to seek out and utilize culturally appropriate instruments. Additionally, when interpreting results, cultural contexts and nuances should be taken into account (Suzuki, Prendes-Lintel, & Ahluwalia, 2005).
- Inclusive Curriculum Development: Advocate for a curriculum that integrates diverse perspectives, stories, and historical events. Such inclusivity fosters a more enriched learning environment, promotes mutual respect, and recognizes the contributions of all cultures (Banks & Banks, 2010).
- Family and Community Collaboration: Families offer invaluable insights into a student’s cultural background, values, and experiences. Collaborating with families, as well as tapping into community resources, can provide broader support for students and foster a sense of belonging (Trumbull, Rothstein-Fisch, Greenfield, & Quiroz, 2001).
- Professional Development: It’s paramount for school psychologists and educators to regularly engage in professional development focused on multicultural competencies. This ongoing education keeps professionals updated on the latest research, strategies, and best practices in the ever-evolving realm of multicultural education (Lee & Thompson, 2017).
- Promote Cross-Cultural Peer Interactions: Schools can be pivotal platforms for fostering cross-cultural understanding among students. By promoting diverse peer interactions through group activities, projects, or buddy systems, students can learn directly from each other, thereby dispelling myths and building mutual respect.
By adhering to these best practices, school psychologists will be better equipped to navigate the complexities of multicultural issues, ensuring that all students, regardless of their cultural background, have equal opportunities to thrive both academically and personally.
Conclusion
The evolving landscape of global migration, along with the natural ebb and flow of cultural exchange, underscores the growing importance of multicultural competence in the field of school psychology. Every student, regardless of their cultural, linguistic, or socioeconomic background, is entitled to an education that recognizes, respects, and values their unique experiences and perspectives. Ensuring this becomes a reality necessitates a proactive approach from educators, psychologists, and policy makers.
Addressing multicultural issues is not merely a matter of compliance or checking off a list of professional competencies. It is a deeply ethical endeavor, rooted in the commitment to fostering equitable, inclusive, and dynamic learning environments where every student can flourish. As Gay (2010) eloquently put it, culturally responsive teaching is a pedagogical imperative that speaks to the very heart of quality education.
It’s important to note that the journey toward multicultural competence is continuous. The beauty and complexity of culture mean that there will always be more to learn, understand, and appreciate. Ongoing professional development, collaboration, and self-reflection are integral components of this journey (Banks & Banks, 2010). Furthermore, as Lee and Thompson (2017) highlighted, the integration of multicultural principles in school counseling practices is essential to meet the diverse needs of gifted and talented students from various backgrounds.
In closing, while there are challenges in integrating multiculturalism into school psychology, the rewards—both in terms of academic outcomes and socio-emotional well-being—are profound. As schools increasingly reflect the rich tapestry of global cultures, the role of school psychologists in championing multicultural competence becomes even more pivotal. The future is undeniably diverse, and with informed, compassionate, and proactive strategies, school psychologists can lead the way in ensuring that this diversity is celebrated, understood, and leveraged for the benefit of all.
References:
- Artiles, A. J., & Ortiz, A. A. (2002). English language learners with special education needs: Assessment, identification, and instruction. Delta Systems Co., Inc.
- Banks, J. A. (1993). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. Review of Research in Education, 19(1), 3-49.
- Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. (2010). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives. John Wiley & Sons.
- Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied psychology, 55(3), 303-332.
- Castillo, J. M. (2013). School psychology 2010–2020: Demographic shifts, severe budget cuts, and the Chicago teachers union strike—A perfect storm—But potentially a perfect opportunity. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(2), 138.
- Castillo, J. M. (2014). Supporting the socio-emotional development of secondary students with learning disabilities: Implications from research to practice. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 12(2), 149-170.
- Foxcroft, C. D. (2004). Planning a culturally fair intelligence test for South African school beginners. South African Journal of Psychology, 34(4), 505-524.
- Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
- Goforth, A. N. (2015). Using and interpreting diagnostic tests. In Multicultural school psychology competencies (pp. 209-242). Routledge.
- Graham, S. (2006). The role of production factors in learning disabled students’ compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 669-681.
- Hall, G. C. N., & Maramba, G. G. (2001). In search of cultural diversity: Recent literature in cross-cultural and ethnic minority psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7(1), 12-26.
- Helms, J. E. (2006). Fairness in testing and assessment. In F. A. Villarruel, G. Carlo, J. M. Grau, M. Azmitia, N. J. Cabrera, & T. J. Chahin (Eds.), Handbook of U.S. Latino psychology: Developmental and community-based perspectives (pp. 293-309). SAGE Publications.
- Hernandez, J. V., & McDowell, T. (1987). Cultural bias in intelligence testing and learning disabilities classifications: A Hispanic perspective. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(1), 3-13.
- Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Owen, J., Worthington Jr, E. L., & Utsey, S. O. (2013). Cultural humility: Measuring openness to culturally diverse clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 353.
- Ingraham, C. L. (2000). Consultation through a multicultural lens: Multicultural and cross-cultural consultation in schools. School Psychology Review, 29(3), 320-343.
- Lee, C. C. (2013). Multicultural issues in counseling: New approaches to diversity. American Counseling Association.
- Lee, S. M., & Thompson, A. (2017). Handbook of school counseling for students with gifts and talents: Critical issues for a diverse population. Routledge.
- Lidz, C. S., & Peña, E. D. (2009). Response to intervention and dynamic assessment: Do we just appear to be speaking the same language? Seminars in Speech and Language, 30(4), 121-133.
- Newell, M. L., Nastasi, B. K., & Hatzichristou, C. (2003). School psychologist training for the promotion of mental health in multicultural contexts: Challenges and opportunities. School Psychology International, 24(4), 459-475.
- Newell, M. L., Nastasi, B. K., Hatzichristou, C., Jones, J. M., Schanding, G. T., & Yetter, G. (2010). Evidence on multicultural training in school psychology: Recommendations for future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(4), 249.
- Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2008). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Ortiz, S. O., & Jani, J. (2010). Critical race theory: A transformational model for counseling and psychotherapy with Native Americans. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(3), 333-339.
- Proctor, S. L., & Romano, M. (2016). The role of the school psychologist in the identification of English language learners. Contemporary School Psychology, 20(1), 31-42.
- Rhodes, R. L., Ochoa, S. H., & Ortiz, S. O. (2005). Assessing culturally and linguistically diverse students: A practical guide. Guilford Press.
- Rogers, M. R. (2012). Racial/ethnic matching of clients and school psychologists: A national survey. Psychology in the Schools, 49(8), 801-813.
- Rogers-Sirin, L., Eseda, C. U., & Sirin, S. (2014). Exploring school psychologist cultural competence: A closer look at the two-factor theory of cultural sensitivity. Contemporary School Psychology, 18(1), 34-44.
- Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
- Samson, J. F., & Ojanen, E. (2019). Cross-cultural competence of school psychologists: Research, training, and practice. Contemporary School Psychology, 23(3), 265-277.
- Samway, K. D., & McKeon, D. (2007). Myths and realities: Best practices for English language learners. Heinemann.
- Schlesinger, A. M. (1998). The disuniting of America: Reflections on a multicultural society (Revised and enlarged edition). W.W. Norton & Company.
- Singh, A. A., & Dutta, R. (2010). Counseling and qualitative research: Shared worldviews and skills. Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, 2(2), 122-136.
- Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271.
- Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2016). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
- Suzuki, L. A., Prendes-Lintel, M., & Ahluwalia, M. K. (2005). Revisiting the debate of the cultural bias of mental health diagnostic tools for ethnic minorities. Handbook of multicultural counseling, 2, 509-521.
- Trumbull, E., Rothstein-Fisch, C., Greenfield, P. M., & Quiroz, B. (2001). Bridging cultures between home and school: A guide for teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Truscott, S. D., Kreskey, D., Bolling, M., Psimas, L., Graybill, E., Albritton, K., & Schwartz, A. (2012). Creating cross-cultural connections through a community study group. Journal of School Psychology, 50(4), 499-514.