In the realm of school psychology, the intricate dynamics of family and parenting play a pivotal role in shaping a child’s academic and emotional trajectory. This article delves into the multifaceted relationships between parenting styles, parent education and training, and their consequent impacts on academic outcomes. It also illuminates the challenges and adjustments related to single-parent families and parental divorce, highlighting the imperative for supportive interventions. Furthermore, with the evolution of diverse family structures, contemporary challenges emerge, necessitating an adaptive approach from school psychologists. This comprehensive exploration underscores the indispensability of fostering collaborative synergies between families, schools, and psychologists to holistically champion children’s well-being.
The family unit is undeniably foundational to the development of children and adolescents. Often characterized as the primary socialization agent, it is within the confines of familial structures that a child’s cognitive, emotional, and social development is profoundly shaped. Parenting, as an elemental component of this unit, wields significant influence over not only the immediate environment that surrounds a child but also molds long-term perspectives and adaptabilities. The vital nature of this relationship has never escaped the purview of researchers and practitioners in the realm of educational and developmental psychology (Bronfenbrenner, 1979).
School psychologists, situated at the intersection of education and psychology, have been especially attentive to the intricate dance of family dynamics and their reverberating effects within school settings. Whether it’s understanding the unique challenges and strengths of single-parent households, offering supportive structures for children navigating the turbulent waters of parental divorce, or advocating for holistic parental involvement strategies, these professionals play a pivotal role. Their work often goes beyond mere observation, delving into active interventions that aim to optimize the educational experience for every child, irrespective of their familial backdrop (Sheridan & Kratochwill, 2008).
Yet, the landscape of family and parenting is not static. It is continually evolving, influenced by societal shifts, cultural nuances, and emerging research. Consequently, the role of school psychologists, too, is in a state of flux, demanding ongoing reflection, adaptation, and upskilling. As we delve into the complexities of family and parenting within the context of school psychology in subsequent sections, it is this dynamic, multifaceted, and profoundly influential relationship that will remain at the forefront.
The Core Concept of Parenting
Parenting, as a concept, has undergone significant evolution in its understanding and theoretical underpinnings over the decades. At its core, parenting refers to the activities and practices employed by caregivers to promote and support the physical, emotional, social, and intellectual development of a child from infancy to adulthood. It is a complex interplay of nurture, guidance, discipline, and fostering independence, each phase bringing its own set of challenges and rewards (Baumrind, 1967).
One of the foundational frameworks in understanding parenting styles was presented by Diana Baumrind, who classified them into three main types: authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive. These styles, identified by distinct patterns of responsiveness and demand, have been crucial in understanding the impact of parental behaviors on child outcomes. Authoritative parenting, which balances demands with responsiveness, has been consistently linked with positive developmental outcomes in children. In contrast, both authoritarian (high demands, low responsiveness) and permissive (low demands, high responsiveness) styles have been associated with less optimal child development patterns (Baumrind, 1991).
The socio-cultural context in which parenting takes place cannot be overlooked. Cultural norms, societal expectations, and individual beliefs profoundly influence parenting practices. For instance, while Western societies might lean towards promoting individualism and autonomy, many Eastern cultures might prioritize family cohesion and respect for elders. These cultural nuances play a significant role in shaping parenting strategies and, subsequently, child outcomes (Chao, 1994).
Furthermore, the role of parental resilience and adaptability has garnered attention in recent research. Modern-day challenges, from economic pressures to navigating the digital age, have necessitated that parents remain both resilient and adaptable. How parents handle stress, adapt to changing circumstances, and model coping mechanisms can significantly impact a child’s own resilience and coping skills in school settings and beyond (Masten & Monn, 2015).
In conclusion, parenting, as a construct, is multi-dimensional. Its impact on child development is profound and long-lasting. For school psychologists, understanding the nuances of parenting styles and their influences becomes crucial, especially when devising interventions or strategies tailored to individual student needs. Recognizing the socio-cultural backdrop and appreciating the resilience and adaptability of parents can significantly enhance the efficacy of school-based initiatives.
Parent Education and Parent Training
Parent education and parent training are vital tools in the arsenal of school psychologists and other professionals working with children. They focus on equipping parents with knowledge, skills, and strategies to promote positive child development and manage challenging behaviors effectively. While these terms are sometimes used interchangeably, they have distinct objectives and methods.
Parent education primarily involves providing parents with information, insights, and understanding about child development. This is rooted in the belief that when parents understand the developmental milestones and the reasons behind certain behaviors, they are better positioned to support their children’s growth and well-being (Brooks, 1981). This form of education may cover a wide range of topics such as cognitive, emotional, and physical developmental stages; the impact of external factors like media or peer pressure; or the needs of children with specific challenges or disabilities.
On the other hand, parent training is more skills-focused, aiming to enhance parents’ abilities to handle specific challenges, particularly concerning behavior management. Techniques often taught in these training sessions include positive reinforcement, time-out, problem-solving, and communication strategies (Webster-Stratton & Hammond, 1990). This hands-on, technique-driven approach empowers parents to implement evidence-based interventions in real-world settings, fostering more consistent and effective parenting practices.
Research has consistently demonstrated the benefits of both parent education and parent training. One significant advantage is the improvement in parent-child relationships. When parents are equipped with appropriate knowledge and skills, they can interact with their children in more understanding and effective ways, leading to enhanced bonding and reduced conflict (Sanders, 2008). Furthermore, these initiatives often lead to more positive child outcomes, including better academic performance, reduced behavioral issues, and enhanced socio-emotional development (Nowak & Heinrichs, 2008).
Importantly, the socio-cultural backdrop plays a pivotal role in shaping the efficacy of parent education and training programs. Cultural sensitivity and respect are essential when designing and delivering these programs. For instance, a strategy that is effective in one cultural or socioeconomic group might not necessarily translate well to another. Thus, tailoring interventions to respect and address the unique needs and values of diverse families is paramount (Matsumoto & Juang, 2008).
In summary, parent education and training are instrumental in supporting positive child development and enhancing parent-child relationships. They are not just tools to manage problematic behaviors but also strategies to foster understanding, enhance skills, and build stronger family units. For school psychologists, integrating these programs into broader school-based initiatives can yield profound and lasting benefits for both students and their families.
Parents as Teachers
The concept of “Parents as Teachers” underscores the foundational role parents play in shaping their child’s learning journey, even before formal education begins. This role is not limited to academic instruction but also encompasses fostering a love for learning, instilling values, and developing crucial life skills. Recognizing parents as the child’s first and most influential teachers is pivotal for holistic child development and effective school-family partnerships.
The “Parents as Teachers” (PAT) program, initiated in the 1980s, exemplifies this philosophy. The PAT program focuses on enhancing child development and school readiness by offering parent education, family support, and developmental screening during the critical early years of a child’s life, especially from birth to age five (Pfannenstiel, Seitz, & Zigler, 2002). Through home visits, group meetings, and resource networks, PAT equips parents with the tools and strategies they need to recognize and capitalize on the everyday learning opportunities that arise in the child’s environment.
Research has highlighted numerous benefits of the PAT approach. One of the primary outcomes is improved school readiness. Children whose families were engaged in the PAT program showed better pre-literacy skills, mathematical understanding, and social-emotional development upon entering kindergarten than their non-PAT counterparts (Wagner & Clayton, 1999). Moreover, these children displayed more positive attitudes towards school, better attendance rates, and reduced need for special education services in the early elementary years.
Another significant benefit of the PAT approach is its emphasis on fostering strong parent-child bonds. By helping parents understand the nuances of child development, it guides them in responsive parenting practices that deepen their connection with their children (Zigler, Pfannenstiel, & Seitz, 2008). This emotional bond is vital not only for the child’s socio-emotional health but also as a strong predictor of academic success.
Despite the evident advantages, the “Parents as Teachers” approach requires careful implementation. One challenge is ensuring that the strategies are culturally sensitive and tailored to the unique needs and values of diverse families (Jones Harden, 2000). Furthermore, as schools and communities adopt this philosophy, they must ensure consistent support, training, and resources for parents to actualize their roles effectively.
In conclusion, the “Parents as Teachers” philosophy underscores the irreplaceable role parents play in a child’s educational journey. For school psychologists and educators, acknowledging and leveraging this role can lead to enhanced school readiness, stronger parent-child bonds, and holistic child development. As the educational landscape continues to evolve, the partnership between schools and parents becomes even more crucial, making programs like PAT indispensable.
Single-Parent Families in the School Context
Single-parent families, a family structure where a child or children live with only one parent, represent a significant portion of households worldwide. The emergence of single-parent families as a common family dynamic is a reflection of various societal changes, including increases in divorce rates, non-marital childbirth, and the choice by some individuals to raise children independently (Amato, 2000). The dynamics within single-parent households often differ from those in dual-parent homes, and these differences can have unique implications for a child’s educational journey.
The challenges faced by single parents are multifaceted. Economic hardship is commonly reported, as a single income must support the household. This financial strain can lead to residential instability, with families moving frequently in search of affordable housing or employment. Such instability can disrupt a child’s education, requiring them to change schools, lose established social connections, and adapt to new educational environments (Astone & McLanahan, 1994). Furthermore, single parents may struggle to find time for active involvement in their child’s education, due to work commitments or the absence of a co-parent to share responsibilities.
From an educational perspective, children from single-parent homes can display varied academic outcomes. Some research indicates that these children might face increased risk for academic challenges and behavioral problems in school (McLanahan & Sandefur, 1994). The potential reasons are diverse, ranging from economic constraints, reduced parental involvement in school activities, to the psychosocial stresses of dealing with parental separation or divorce.
However, it’s crucial to avoid overgeneralizing or stigmatizing single-parent families. Many single parents provide stable, nurturing environments for their children, ensuring they have the resources they need to thrive academically. Additionally, schools can play a vital role in supporting single-parent families by offering flexible parent-teacher conference schedules, providing resources and referrals for financial or counseling services, and creating an inclusive school culture where diverse family structures are respected and celebrated (Morrison & Coiro, 1999).
One of the proactive ways schools can support single-parent families is through fostering a sense of community. Creating opportunities for single parents to connect, share resources, and form supportive networks can be immensely beneficial. Programs or workshops tailored to the specific needs and schedules of single parents, focusing on topics like effective home study strategies or stress management, can also be impactful (Christiansen et al., 2019).
In conclusion, single-parent families bring a unique set of experiences and needs to the school context. By understanding these needs and proactively offering support, school psychologists and educators can help ensure that all children, regardless of family structure, have the opportunity to succeed academically and emotionally.
Divorce Adjustment and Its Impact on Academic Performance
Divorce is a significant life event that profoundly affects the family members involved, especially the children. Over the last few decades, increasing attention has been directed toward understanding the implications of divorce on children’s psychological and academic well-being. The process of divorce adjustment refers to the period of transition and adaptation following a marital separation, which can be marked by emotional, cognitive, and behavioral changes in children (Kelly, 2000).
Academically, children of divorce can face various challenges. These challenges may stem from the upheaval of changing residences, schools, or adjusting to a single-parent household. Often, academic disruptions immediately following a divorce are due to the emotional turmoil children experience, such as feelings of loss, anger, sadness, confusion, and, in some cases, guilt. Emotional distress can manifest as decreased concentration in class, lower homework completion rates, and reduced participation in school activities (Hetherington & Stanley-Hagan, 1999).
One of the key findings in the literature is the variability in children’s responses to divorce. While many children exhibit signs of distress immediately after the divorce, most adapt over time, and their academic performance rebounds. However, a subset of children continues to show persistent academic and behavioral challenges, which can be linked to multiple factors including high levels of parental conflict, economic hardships, and reduced parental support (Sun & Li, 2002).
The school environment plays a critical role in either exacerbating or alleviating the academic challenges faced by children of divorce. Schools that offer counseling services, peer support groups, or teacher training on the needs of children undergoing family transitions can create a more understanding and supportive atmosphere. By recognizing the signs of distress early on and implementing timely interventions, schools can prevent long-term academic difficulties for these children (Størksen, Røysamb, Moum, & Tambs, 2005).
Furthermore, consistent communication between the school and parents during and after a divorce is crucial. Both parents should be informed about their child’s academic progress, behavioral changes, and any concerns raised by teachers or school staff. Such collaboration can lead to joint decision-making in the child’s best interests and foster a stable environment that promotes academic resilience (Lansford, 2009).
In summation, while divorce inevitably brings about challenges for children, its impact on academic performance is modifiable. Proper support systems within the school, combined with a collaborative approach between parents and educators, can significantly aid children in navigating this tumultuous period and maintaining, or even enhancing, their academic achievements.
Promoting Healthy Family Dynamics for Academic Success
Healthy family dynamics play an instrumental role in fostering children’s academic success. It has been well established that a supportive family environment can bolster children’s self-esteem, motivation to learn, and overall well-being, leading to improved academic outcomes (Jeynes, 2007). In contrast, family conflict, lack of structure, and inconsistent parenting can contribute to lower levels of academic achievement. Hence, understanding and promoting factors that contribute to positive family dynamics is crucial for school psychologists, educators, and parents alike.
One of the key components of healthy family dynamics is effective communication. Open, honest, and regular communication within the family ensures that children feel understood, valued, and supported in their academic pursuits. It enables parents to be attuned to the challenges their children may be facing in school and offers an opportunity for collaborative problem-solving (Taylor, Clayton, & Rowley, 2004). Moreover, promoting open dialogue about schoolwork, friendships, and other school-related experiences allows parents to offer guidance, share in their child’s successes, and provide support during challenges.
Structured routines also significantly benefit children’s academic success. Regular schedules for meals, homework, and bedtime help children understand what is expected of them and provide a sense of security. Predictable routines can reduce anxiety and stress, allowing children to focus more effectively on their studies. Furthermore, structured routines foster self-discipline, a trait closely linked to academic success (Brooks-Gunn & Markman, 2005).
Parental involvement is another critical element. Parents who are actively involved in their children’s education, whether it’s helping with homework, attending parent-teacher conferences, or engaging in school activities, tend to have children who perform better academically. Their involvement sends a clear message about the value of education and can motivate children to strive for excellence (Hill & Tyson, 2009).
However, while involvement is essential, it’s equally crucial for parents to strike a balance and avoid exerting undue pressure on their children. High expectations are beneficial, but excessive pressure can lead to anxiety, burnout, and even aversion to academic pursuits (Grolnick & Slowiaczek, 1994).
To foster healthy family dynamics conducive to academic success, school psychologists and educators can:
- Offer workshops for parents on effective communication techniques and the importance of structured routines.
- Encourage parental involvement in school activities while emphasizing the importance of balance.
- Provide resources and materials to help parents understand and support their children’s learning styles and needs.
In conclusion, healthy family dynamics, characterized by effective communication, structured routines, and balanced parental involvement, can create an environment that nurtures children’s academic achievements. With concerted efforts from schools and families, children can be provided with the optimal foundation for success.
Contemporary Challenges in Parenting and their Implications
Parenting in the 21st century presents a myriad of challenges that can significantly impact the academic and emotional well-being of children. The rapid pace of technological advancements, shifting societal norms, and the ever-evolving family structure have brought forth complexities that previous generations might not have encountered. Understanding these contemporary challenges is imperative for school psychologists, educators, and parents to provide the necessary support for children’s holistic development.
Digital Technology and Screen Time
The ubiquity of smartphones, tablets, and computers has reshaped the parenting landscape. While these devices offer educational benefits and opportunities for connection, excessive screen time has been associated with sleep disturbances, decreased academic performance, and social challenges (Twenge & Campbell, 2018). Moreover, online platforms can expose children to cyberbullying and other online risks, necessitating parental vigilance and guidance in navigating the digital realm.
Changing Family Dynamics
The increase in dual-career families, single-parent households, and blended families has significantly changed the familial support system available to children. These changes can lead to challenges related to time management, consistent parenting strategies, and emotional support, which can, in turn, influence a child’s academic and social performance (Amato, 2005).
The heightened focus on achievement and success can place enormous pressure on children. The drive to excel academically, coupled with extracurricular commitments, can lead to stress, anxiety, and burnout. Parents, too, might feel the pressure to ensure their children are always performing at the top, which can inadvertently contribute to the stress experienced by children (Luthar, Barkin, & Crossman, 2013).
Mental Health Concerns
Rising rates of mental health disorders among children and adolescents pose significant challenges for parents. Understanding, recognizing, and addressing issues such as depression, anxiety, and eating disorders require informed and compassionate parenting approaches. Schools play a pivotal role in offering resources, support, and timely interventions (Merikangas et al., 2010).
To navigate these challenges effectively, parents, educators, and school psychologists must engage in collaborative efforts. Open channels of communication between schools and homes can ensure that children receive consistent support. Workshops, training sessions, and resources can equip parents with the tools needed to face contemporary challenges head-on, ensuring their children’s academic and emotional well-being.
In conclusion, the modern era presents unique challenges in parenting that have direct implications for children’s academic and overall development. Through collaboration, understanding, and proactive measures, these challenges can be addressed, fostering an environment conducive to children’s success.
Future Directions in Family and Parenting in School Psychology
The continually evolving nature of societies, family structures, and educational systems means that the landscape of family and parenting in the context of school psychology is also bound to transform. As we look to the future, there are several key trends and considerations that professionals in school psychology must be aware of and prepared to address.
Emphasis on Parent-Child Dyads
The future may see an increased emphasis on the study of parent-child dyads, understanding how the intricacies of this relationship can influence child development and school performance. Parent-child interactions can offer rich insights into children’s emotional and cognitive development. As Cabrera et al. (2018) emphasized, delving deeper into these interactions can aid in developing more targeted interventions that consider both the child’s and the parent’s needs.
Integration of Technology
As technology continues to infiltrate every aspect of modern life, its integration into parenting programs and interventions is inevitable. Future initiatives in school psychology might leverage technology to facilitate parent education, offering online modules, virtual workshops, and apps that provide resources and strategies for parents (Napolitano et al., 2013). This can be particularly useful for parents who might not have the time or means to attend in-person sessions.
Cultural and Diversity Considerations
With increasing globalization, school psychologists will likely encounter families from diverse cultural backgrounds. Understanding and respecting cultural nuances in parenting styles, expectations, and values will be essential. Tailoring interventions and support mechanisms that are culturally sensitive will become a central theme in school psychology (Sue & Sue, 2016).
Instead of reactive measures, the future might emphasize more proactive strategies in parenting support. This means equipping parents with skills, knowledge, and resources before issues arise, thereby preventing or mitigating potential academic or behavioral challenges in children.
Focus on Resilience
Given the myriad of challenges that modern families face, fostering resilience in both parents and children will likely be a core focus area. Equipping families with strategies to cope with adversity, change, and challenges can pave the way for better academic outcomes and emotional well-being for students.
In summary, the future of family and parenting in school psychology is poised to be dynamic, integrative, and proactive. By keeping abreast of emerging trends and challenges, and by leveraging the power of research, technology, and cultural understanding, school psychologists can significantly contribute to enhancing the school experiences and outcomes for children from diverse familial backgrounds.
The intricate connection between family, parenting, and educational outcomes cannot be overstated. Research consistently underscores the importance of familial contexts as critical drivers in children’s academic and emotional development (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). In school psychology, the recognition of diverse family structures, from single-parent households to those navigating the challenges of divorce, calls for specialized interventions that respect and address these unique dynamics (Christenson & Sheridan, 2001).
Emphasizing the role of parent education and training, school psychologists are bridging the gap between home and school environments, ensuring that parents become active participants in their child’s educational journey. As Riffel (1998) posits, when parents are equipped with the right tools and knowledge, they become not just supporters, but active collaborators in shaping their child’s academic trajectory. Looking ahead, the evolving challenges associated with contemporary parenting and shifting family dynamics necessitate a forward-thinking approach in school psychology. The synthesis of home and educational environments, continually molded by emerging research and societal changes, stands central to the holistic well-being of students. As we navigate this intricate landscape, the role of school psychologists—anchored in research, empathy, and proactive intervention—will remain paramount in fostering positive academic and emotional outcomes.
- Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1269-1287.
- Amato, P. R. (2005). The impact of family formation change on the cognitive, social, and emotional well-being of the next generation. The Future of Children, 15(2), 75-96.
- Astone, N. M., & McLanahan, S. S. (1994). Family structure, residential mobility, and school dropout: A research note. Demography, 31(4), 575-584.
- Baumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75(1), 43-88.
- Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56-95.
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Harvard University Press.
- Brooks, J. (1981). Parent education and support programs for families with young handicapped children: A review. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1(2), 59-76.
- Brooks-Gunn, J., & Markman, L. B. (2005). The contribution of parenting to ethnic and racial gaps in school readiness. The Future of Children, 15(1), 139-168.
- Cabrera, N. J., Volling, B. L., & Barr, R. (2018). Fathers Are Parents, Too! Widening the Lens on Parenting for Children’s Development. Child Development Perspectives, 12(3), 152-157.
- Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65(4), 1111-1119.
- Christenson, S. L., & Sheridan, S. M. (2001). Schools and families: Creating essential connections for learning. Guilford Press.
- Christiansen, S. L., Palkovitz, R., McCarroll, M. C., & Azuero, A. (2019). Examining the role of couples’ characteristics in single-parent perceptions of coparenting. Family Relations, 68(5), 546-560.
- Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65(1), 237-252.
- Hetherington, E. M., & Stanley-Hagan, M. (1999). The adjustment of children with divorced parents: A risk and resiliency perspective. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(1), 129-140.
- Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740-763.
- Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42(1), 82-110.
- Jones Harden, B. (2000). Early childhood intervention and life-course development: The evolution of the Parents as Teachers program. Children’s Services: Social Policy, Research, and Practice, 3(3), 177-193.
- Kelly, J. B. (2000). Children’s adjustment in conflicted marriage and divorce: A decade review of research. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(8), 963-973.
- Lansford, J. E. (2009). Parental divorce and children’s adjustment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 140-152.
- Luthar, S. S., Barkin, S. H., & Crossman, E. J. (2013). “I can, therefore I must”: Fragility in the upper-middle classes. Development and Psychopathology, 25(4pt2), 1529-1549.
- Masten, A. S., & Monn, A. R. (2015). Child and family resilience: A call for integrated science, practice, and professional training. Family Relations, 64(1), 5-21.
- McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Harvard University Press.
- Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2008). Culture and psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Merikangas, K. R., Nakamura, E. F., & Kessler, R. C. (2010). Epidemiology of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 12(1), 7-20.
- Morrison, D. R., & Coiro, M. J. (1999). Parental conflict and marital disruption: Do children benefit when high-conflict marriages are dissolved? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 626-637.
- Napolitano, M. A., Hayes, S., Bennett, G. G., Ives, A. K., & Foster, G. D. (2013). Using Facebook and text messaging to deliver a weight loss program to college students. Obesity, 21(1), 25-31.
- Nowak, C., & Heinrichs, N. (2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(3), 114-144.
- Pfannenstiel, J. C., Seitz, V., & Zigler, E. (2002). Promoting school readiness: The role of the Parents as Teachers program. NHSA Dialog, 6(1), 71-86.
- Riffel, L. A. (1998). Parent training programs in school psychology: Current issues and future possibilities. School Psychology International, 19(3), 223-233.
- Sanders, M. R. (2008). Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(4), 506.
- Sheridan, S. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2008). Conjoint behavioral consultation: Promoting family-school connections and interventions. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Størksen, I., Røysamb, E., Moum, T., & Tambs, K. (2005). Adolescents with a childhood experience of parental divorce: A longitudinal study of mental health and adjustment. Journal of Adolescence, 28(6), 725-739.
- Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2016). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
- Sun, Y., & Li, Y. (2002). Children’s well-being during parents’ marital disruption process: A pooled time-series analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(2), 472-488.
- Taylor, L. C., Clayton, J. D., & Rowley, S. J. (2004). Academic socialization: Understanding parental influences on children’s school-related development in the early years. Review of General Psychology, 8(3), 163-178.
- Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based study. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 271-283.
- Wagner, M. M., & Clayton, S. L. (1999). The Parents as Teachers program: Results from two demonstrations. The Future of Children, 91-115.
- Webster-Stratton, C., & Hammond, M. (1990). Predictors of treatment outcome in parent training for families with conduct problem children. Behavior Therapy, 21(3), 319-337.
- Zigler, E., Pfannenstiel, J. C., & Seitz, V. (2008). The Parents as Teachers program and school success: A replication and extension. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 29(2), 103-120.