Research in school psychology plays a pivotal role in understanding the multifaceted dimensions of student development, learning, and behavior in educational settings. As the field has evolved, the emphasis on evidence-based interventions, coupled with diverse research methodologies, has bolstered the effectiveness of interventions and strategies employed by school psychologists. This article delves into the various research methodologies prevalent in school psychology, with a specific focus on evidence-based interventions, qualitative research, and single-case experimental design. The overarching aim is to elucidate the importance of rigorous, ethical, and relevant research in shaping best practices, ensuring student well-being, and fostering academic success. The evolving nature of educational settings further underscores the need for continuous research to address contemporary challenges and capitalize on future opportunities in the realm of school psychology.


School psychology, as a discipline, exists at the confluence of education, psychology, and child development, striving to enhance the academic and socio-emotional well-being of students. This intersection necessitates an evidence-informed approach, grounding interventions and strategies in robust research to ensure their efficacy and relevance. Research, thus, serves as the bedrock upon which school psychologists construct their practice, continually informing and refining their methods in real-world settings (Merrell, Ervin, & Gimpel, 2006).

Academic Writing, Editing, Proofreading, And Problem Solving Services

Get 10% OFF with 24START discount code

The landscape of research in school psychology has witnessed significant evolution over the years. Historically, the field was dominated by quantitative methodologies, aiming for generalizable results. However, with the increasing acknowledgment of the diverse and multifaceted nature of educational settings and student experiences, there has been a discernible shift. Researchers now adopt a broad spectrum of methods, ranging from large-scale quantitative studies to in-depth qualitative inquiries and innovative designs like single-case experimental setups (Thomas, 2013). This dynamic nature of research methodologies reflects the discipline’s responsiveness to the intricate, layered, and oftentimes unpredictable demands of school settings. The ultimate goal remains steadfast: to garner insights that lead to better student outcomes both academically and emotionally (Reynolds & Gutkin, 1999).

Historical Context of Research in School Psychology

The origins of school psychology research can be traced back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries, during the advent of intelligence testing and the progressive education movement. Pioneers like Lightner Witmer, who established the first-ever psychological clinic in 1896 at the University of Pennsylvania, laid the groundwork for what would become modern-day school psychology. Witmer’s clinic was developed to address the educational challenges faced by children, blending clinical psychology’s diagnostic techniques with an emphasis on school-related interventions (Fagan & Wise, 2007).

A pivotal shift in school psychology research occurred in the mid-20th century with the rise of evidence-based practices. These practices emphasized the integration of professional expertise with the best available evidence in making decisions about how to deliver care. The advent of evidence-based practices was driven by a need to ensure that interventions employed in school settings were not only theoretically sound but also empirically validated. Thorndike’s Law of Effect and the foundational studies of B.F. Skinner on operant conditioning provided a rigorous scientific approach to understanding learning and behavior, setting the stage for the development of evidence-based behavioral interventions (Kratochwill & Shernoff, 2004).

In the 1970s and 1980s, there was a concerted push for school psychologists to rely more heavily on research-backed approaches, leading to the widespread adoption of evidence-based interventions in school settings. The field recognized that to achieve the best outcomes for students, interventions had to be grounded in sound research. This era saw the rise of journals like “School Psychology Review” and “Journal of School Psychology,” which provided platforms for disseminating research specific to the school context. The emphasis on evidence-based practice was further solidified with the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, which mandated the use of scientifically based instructional strategies to improve academic outcomes (Gresham, 2007).

As the field progressed, the importance of ensuring that interventions were not only effective but also culturally and contextually relevant became evident. This highlighted the necessity for diverse research methods, such as qualitative research, to capture the rich nuances and intricacies of school settings across different cultures and communities (Nastasi & Hitchcock, 2016).

Evidence-Based Interventions

In the ever-evolving domain of school psychology, the emphasis on evidence-based practices has gained paramount importance. These practices, often referred to as Evidence-Based Interventions (EBIs), ensure that interventions employed within school settings are grounded in scientific research and have a track record of producing effective outcomes. Such an approach not only amplifies the probability of success but also instills confidence in educators, parents, and stakeholders about the interventions being used. This section delves deep into the definition, significance, processes, and critiques associated with evidence-based interventions in school psychology (Odom et al., 2005; Cook et al., 2008).

Definition and Significance

Evidence-Based Interventions (EBIs) refer to practices or programs that have been scientifically evaluated and have demonstrated effectiveness in achieving the desired outcomes. In the context of school psychology, these outcomes typically involve improvements in student behavior, academic performance, emotional well-being, or social skills. The significance of EBIs lies in their ability to provide educators, clinicians, and stakeholders with interventions that have a proven track record, reducing the guesswork and increasing the likelihood of success (Odom, Brantlinger, Gersten, Horner, & Thompson, 2005).

The Process of Determining and Verifying Interventions as Evidence-Based

The determination of an intervention as evidence-based is a rigorous process. Initially, the intervention is often developed based on sound theoretical foundations and preliminary research findings. Following this, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) – considered the gold standard in empirical research – are employed to assess the effectiveness of the intervention. RCTs involve randomly assigning participants to either the intervention group or a control group to ascertain the intervention’s impact. Once the results indicate a significant positive effect, the intervention is deemed evidence-based. However, multiple studies and replications across diverse settings are usually required to establish the robustness and generalizability of findings (Cook, Tankersley, & Harjusola-Webb, 2008).

Meta-analyses, which aggregate the results of multiple studies on the same intervention, are often used to provide an overall measure of the intervention’s effectiveness and to identify factors that might influence its efficacy.

Application and Implications of Evidence-Based Interventions in School Settings

Implementing EBIs in schools ensures that students receive the best available support, enhancing their chances for positive academic and socio-emotional outcomes. Moreover, using EBIs can make efficient use of resources, both in terms of time and funding, as these interventions are more likely to yield results. For instance, an EBI focused on reading strategies can significantly improve reading skills, reducing the need for more intensive interventions down the line (Harn, Parisi, & Stoolmiller, 2013).

However, while the efficacy of EBIs is established in controlled settings, real-world school environments often introduce variables that can affect outcomes. Thus, while applying EBIs, school psychologists and educators must consider the unique needs and contexts of their students and be prepared to adapt accordingly.

Challenges and Critiques Associated with Strict Adherence to Evidence-Based Practices

While the benefits of EBIs are manifold, several critiques and challenges are associated with their strict adherence. One primary concern is that an over-reliance on EBIs might stifle innovation, limiting professionals from trying out newer or alternative approaches that haven’t yet been researched extensively (Sackett, Rosenberg, Gray, Haynes, & Richardson, 1996).

Additionally, what works in one setting with a particular group might not be as effective in another due to cultural, socio-economic, or other contextual differences. Hence, the uncritical application of EBIs can lead to inadequate or inappropriate support for certain student populations (Castro, Barrera, & Holleran Steiker, 2010).

Lastly, while RCTs are powerful tools, they are not always feasible or ethical in school settings. This has led some to argue for a broader understanding of “evidence,” incorporating qualitative data and practitioner experience into the definition (Kazdin, 2003).

Research Methodologies in School Psychology

Research in school psychology is as diverse as the myriad of challenges and opportunities encountered within educational settings. To ensure the effective application of interventions and derive meaningful insights, researchers must select methodologies tailored to the unique characteristics and demands of schools. This section presents a comprehensive exploration of the various research methods employed in school psychology, evaluating their strengths, limitations, and appropriateness within school contexts.

Qualitative Research

Qualitative research, characterized by its explorative nature, focuses on gaining in-depth understanding and insights into human behavior and experiences. In the realm of school psychology, this method serves as a powerful tool to delve deep into subjective experiences, feelings, beliefs, and perceptions of students, educators, and parents.

  • Definition and characteristics: Qualitative research primarily centers on understanding phenomena from the participants’ perspectives, typically employing open-ended questions and focusing on the meaning-making process (Creswell, 2013).
  • Methods: Various qualitative methods, such as interviews, focus groups, and observations, allow researchers to garner rich data. For instance, individual interviews may uncover students’ perceptions about school climate, while focus groups can shed light on group dynamics or collective experiences.
  • Strengths and limitations specific to school settings: One of the primary strengths of qualitative research lies in its ability to capture the complexity and richness of school experiences (Merriam, 2009). However, the subjective nature of data collection and analysis can sometimes pose challenges in terms of replicability and generalizability.
  • Case studies: An example of qualitative research’s impact in school psychology is a study that used focus groups to understand students’ experiences with bullying, leading to tailored interventions addressing the specific nuances identified during these discussions.

Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED)

SCED is a research method that emphasizes individual participant responses to interventions over time, frequently employed in applied settings like schools.

  • Definition and key features: SCED examines how an individual responds to an intervention by assessing them multiple times before, during, and after the application of the intervention (Horner et al., 2005).
  • Application and significance in school psychology research: SCED is particularly beneficial in school settings to monitor the progress of individual students, enabling adjustments to interventions based on the data obtained (Kratochwill & Shernoff, 2004).
  • Benefits: By emphasizing individual responses, SCED provides an in-depth understanding of how interventions function for specific students, making it invaluable for tailoring strategies to unique student needs.
  • Considerations and challenges: Despite its advantages, SCED requires consistent data collection and may not always be generalizable to larger populations.

Quantitative Research

Quantitative research, grounded in numerical data, seeks to identify patterns, relationships, and statistical significances.

  • Definition and characteristics: Quantitative research involves the systematic collection and analysis of numerical data, often aiming to establish causal relationships or predict outcomes (Creswell, 2013).
  • Common statistical methods: Various statistical methods, from t-tests to regression analyses, are employed in school psychology to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, identify patterns in student achievement, and more.
  • Strengths and limitations in the context of school research: Quantitative research can provide generalizable and objective data, crucial for large-scale interventions and policy-making. However, it may sometimes overlook individual experiences or nuances, which qualitative methods might better capture.

In summation, the choice of research methodology in school psychology is pivotal to the accuracy, depth, and applicability of findings. Whether utilizing the in-depth insights afforded by qualitative research, the individual-centric focus of Single-Case Experimental Design, or the broad generalizability of quantitative research, each method offers distinct advantages tailored to various research questions and school contexts. The integration of these methodologies not only bolsters the robustness of school psychology research but also ensures that interventions and strategies are evidence-based, holistic, and tailored to the multifaceted needs of students and educators. As school environments and challenges evolve, so too must the research approaches that seek to understand and address them, ensuring that every student benefits from the advancements in school psychology research.

Ethical Considerations in School Psychology Research

Research in school psychology holds the promise of advancing our understanding of student behavior, learning processes, and effective interventions. However, the very nature of conducting research in school settings, especially involving vulnerable populations like children, mandates stringent ethical considerations. Ethical considerations are not merely procedural hurdles; they are fundamental to ensuring the validity of the research, the safety and dignity of participants, and the broader trust in the field of school psychology.

The Role and Importance of Ethics in Research

At the core, ethics in research serve to protect participants from harm and ensure that research is conducted with integrity and respect. For school psychologists, the stakes are particularly high. Children, as a population, are more vulnerable and may not fully grasp the implications of their participation in a study. The primary goal is to ensure that students are neither physically nor psychologically harmed and that their rights, including privacy and autonomy, are protected (Koocher & Keith-Spiegel, 2018). Beyond the immediate participants, unethical research can have lasting negative impacts, eroding trust in the educational system and in the field of psychology more broadly.

Common Ethical Dilemmas Faced by School Psychologists

  1. Informed Consent: Gaining proper consent is a foundational principle of ethical research. However, with minors, this becomes complicated. While parents or guardians typically provide consent, the assent (a form of agreement) of the child is also crucial. Balancing parental consent with the child’s assent can be a delicate matter.
  2. Confidentiality: Ensuring the confidentiality of student information is paramount, especially when dealing with sensitive data like psychological assessments, grades, or personal histories (Jacob & Hartshorne, 2007). Yet, in a school setting, maintaining strict confidentiality can be challenging.
  3. Dual Relationships: School psychologists often wear many hats—they might be researchers, therapists, and perhaps even staff members at the school. This multiplicity of roles can lead to conflicts of interest. For instance, a student might be a research participant for a psychologist and also receive counseling from them.
  4. Interventional Studies: When research involves the introduction of an intervention, there’s a potential risk that some students might receive benefits (like a new teaching method) while others don’t, leading to issues of fairness and equity.

Strategies and Guidelines for Ensuring Ethical Practices

To navigate the complex ethical landscape, school psychologists rely on various strategies and guidelines:

  1. Adhering to Professional Codes: Organizations like the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) provide comprehensive ethical and professional guidelines that serve as a roadmap for practitioners (NASP, 2010).
  2. Continual Training: Ethics isn’t a static domain. As new challenges arise, especially with advancements in technology and research methodologies, ongoing training becomes vital.
  3. Seeking Supervision and Peer Review: Discussing potential ethical challenges with colleagues or supervisors often provides clarity and ensures accountability.
  4. Transparent Communication: Regularly updating stakeholders, particularly parents and school administrators, about the research’s progress, findings, and any potential issues can build trust and preemptively address concerns.

In conclusion, ethical considerations lie at the heart of school psychology research. They ensure that the welfare of students is always prioritized and that research outcomes are not only scientifically valid but also morally sound.

Integration of Research into Practice

The discipline of school psychology revolves around a central endeavor: to enhance the well-being and academic success of students. For this mission to be realized, the bridge between theoretical research and tangible practice is crucial. The synergy of integrating research into practice ensures that interventions, techniques, and approaches are not only evidence-based but also tailored to the ever-changing dynamics of school environments.

Translating Research Findings into Actionable Interventions

One of the primary challenges in school psychology is the translation of research findings into practical interventions that can be implemented in real-world school settings. Such a translation involves several steps:

  1. Evaluation of Relevance: Not all research findings are immediately applicable to every school setting. It is crucial to evaluate the context of the study, the population involved, and the nuances of the intervention to determine its relevance to a specific school or district (Kratochwill & Shernoff, 2004).
  2. Adaptation: Often, direct replication of a research-backed intervention is not feasible. Adaptation involves making necessary modifications while retaining the core components of the intervention.
  3. Pilot Implementation: Before a full-scale implementation, it’s beneficial to test the intervention on a smaller scale, allowing for any unexpected challenges to be identified and addressed.

The Importance of Continuous Professional Development and Staying Updated with Current Research

The field of school psychology, like all scientific domains, is constantly evolving. New theories emerge, fresh research provides updated insights, and old paradigms are frequently challenged. For school psychologists to be effective, a commitment to continuous learning is paramount.

Professional development opportunities, such as workshops, seminars, and conferences, provide practitioners with the chance to learn about the latest research findings and innovative practices (Brown, Daly, & Leong, 2009). Moreover, engaging in peer discussions and journal clubs can facilitate a deeper understanding of current research and its practical implications.

Collaborative Efforts Between Researchers and Practitioners to Ensure Effective Implementation

The gap between research and practice can be bridged more effectively through active collaboration between researchers and practitioners:

  1. Feedback Loops: Practitioners can provide researchers with feedback about the real-world applicability of their findings, leading to more refined research questions in future studies.
  2. Participatory Action Research: This approach involves practitioners actively participating in the research process, ensuring that the studies are grounded in real-world challenges and needs (McIntosh & Horner, 2016).
  3. Joint Training Programs: Collaborative training sessions, where researchers and practitioners learn together, can foster a shared understanding and mutual respect.

In sum, the integration of research into practice in school psychology is not a linear or straightforward process. It requires diligence, adaptability, and collaboration. Yet, when done effectively, it promises interventions that are both evidence-based and deeply attuned to the unique needs and challenges of school settings.

Contemporary Issues and Challenges

School psychology research is at the crossroads of multiple disciplines: education, psychology, developmental science, and sociology, to name a few. As the field seeks to align its research priorities with the changing dynamics of educational environments and broader societal shifts, several contemporary issues and challenges emerge. These not only dictate the direction of future investigations but also underscore the nuanced complexities inherent in studying school-based phenomena.

Evolving Educational Landscapes and Their Implications for Research

Education is not a static domain. Factors such as technological advancements, policy shifts, curricular changes, and the integration of digital learning paradigms significantly influence educational landscapes (Gallagher, 2018). These shifts necessitate that research in school psychology evolves concurrently, ensuring that its findings remain relevant and actionable. For instance, with the proliferation of online and blended learning due to global events like the COVID-19 pandemic, research has had to consider new variables such as virtual peer dynamics, online bullying, or the impacts of screen time on cognition and well-being.

Addressing Diverse Student Populations and the Push for Culturally Responsive Research

Modern school settings are microcosms of broader societal diversity. They are characterized by students from varied cultural, linguistic, socioeconomic, and cognitive backgrounds. This diversity calls for research that is culturally sensitive and considers factors such as language, ethnicity, and cultural norms in its methodologies and interpretations (Yamamoto & Li, 2018). Moreover, there’s a pressing need for interventions that are not only evidence-based but also culturally competent, ensuring that they resonate with the unique needs and contexts of diverse student populations.

The Balance between Rigorous Research and the Practical Constraints of School Settings

Rigorous research often demands controlled environments, standardized measures, and meticulous methodologies. However, school settings, by their very nature, are dynamic, multifaceted, and unpredictable (Sandoval & Bell, 2020). This presents a significant challenge: how can researchers maintain the integrity and rigor of their studies while also accounting for the myriad variables present in real-world school environments? This balance is particularly pertinent when considering interventions. While a strategy might be effective under controlled conditions, its efficacy might wane when applied in a classroom with its unique blend of personalities, challenges, and resources.

In conclusion, as school psychology research grapples with these contemporary issues, it emphasizes the need for adaptability, inclusivity, and a keen understanding of the multifaceted contexts in which schools operate. While challenges are aplenty, they also pave the way for innovative methodologies, interdisciplinary collaborations, and a renewed focus on making research as impactful and relevant as possible.

Future Directions

School psychology research, at its core, seeks to understand, inform, and optimize the experiences of students, educators, and other stakeholders within the educational milieu. As the world outside of the classroom continues to change at an unprecedented pace, so too must the research methodologies and focal areas of this vital field. This section delves into some emerging trends, the burgeoning role of technology, and potential areas of growth that are anticipated to define the trajectory of school psychology research in the coming decades.

Emerging Trends in School Psychology Research

A distinct trend in modern research is the movement towards a more holistic understanding of the student. Instead of considering students’ academic achievements in isolation, there is a growing emphasis on viewing academic outcomes in conjunction with socio-emotional, psychological, and physiological well-being (Martínez-López, Piqueras, & Inglés, 2021). This includes explorations into the intersections of mental health and learning, as well as the impact of socio-emotional competencies on academic outcomes.

Another trend is the heightened focus on ecological systems theory, emphasizing the interconnectedness of various systems—family, school, community—in influencing a student’s experiences and outcomes (Bronfenbrenner & Morris, 2019). This requires comprehensive, multidisciplinary research endeavors that can account for these multifaceted influences.

The Role of Technology in Shaping Future Research Methodologies

Technology, particularly advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), big data analytics, and virtual reality (VR), is set to revolutionize school psychology research. For instance, AI-driven algorithms can sift through massive datasets to identify patterns, predictors, and outcomes related to student performance and well-being that might not be immediately discernible to human researchers (Wang & Hancock, 2020).

Virtual Reality, on the other hand, offers immersive environments for experimental studies, allowing researchers to simulate real-world school scenarios with high fidelity. This can lead to more nuanced understandings of phenomena such as classroom dynamics, peer interactions, and learning modalities.

Anticipated Areas of Growth and Exploration in Research

Future school psychology research is expected to delve deeper into the neural underpinnings of learning and behavior, given the rapid advancements in neuroimaging techniques. This could lead to more targeted interventions, especially for students with learning differences or neurodevelopmental disorders.

There’s also anticipated growth in the area of culturally responsive and inclusive research, given the increasing diversity of student populations. This would entail methodologies that are adaptable and sensitive to varying cultural, linguistic, and socio-economic contexts (Jackson & López, 2022).

Additionally, as the lines between the physical and digital worlds blur, research into digital well-being, online learning environments, and the impact of technology on student cognition and socio-emotional health will become increasingly salient.

In conclusion, the future of school psychology research promises to be an exciting amalgamation of interdisciplinary explorations, technological innovations, and a deepened commitment to understanding and enhancing the myriad facets of the student experience.


The realm of school psychology stands at the confluence of academia, human development, interpersonal dynamics, and societal influences. The emphasis on research within this field is not just a scholarly endeavor but an earnest attempt to unravel the complexities of the educational ecosystem and to offer meaningful, actionable insights that can truly benefit its constituents. From the historical foundations of early studies to the contemporary embrace of technology and advanced methodologies, research in school psychology has been and remains a beacon guiding best practices within schools.

Evidence-Based Interventions, Qualitative Research, and Single-Case Experimental Design, among other methodologies, are emblematic of the field’s dedication to thorough, rigorous investigation. They underline the need for interventions and practices that are not just theoretically sound, but also empirically validated (Kratochwill & Shernoff, 2004). The ethos of the field remains: any recommendation, any intervention, any practice should be rooted in reliable research.

Moreover, as the educational landscape grows more diverse and technologically integrated, the challenges for school psychology research proliferate. Addressing these will require an amalgamation of traditional research acumen with innovative approaches. But, as history has shown, the field is adept at evolution, always aligning its focus with the pressing needs of the time.

In drawing this article to a close, it is crucial to acknowledge the immense responsibility that lies with school psychologists and researchers. The findings of their studies, the interventions they recommend, and the strategies they devise have direct implications on young lives. As the future unfolds, may the field of school psychology continue to harness the power of research to illuminate, advocate, and enhance the educational journey of every student.


  1. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2019). The bioecological model of human development. In Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, Theory and Method (Vol. 1, pp. 1-42).
  2. Brown, D., Daly, B., & Leong, F. T. L. (2009). Mentoring in research: A developmental approach. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(3), 306-313.
  3. Castro, F. G., Barrera, M., & Holleran Steiker, L. K. (2010). Issues and challenges in the design of culturally adapted evidence-based interventions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 213-239.
  4. Cook, B. G., Tankersley, M., & Harjusola-Webb, S. (2008). Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education: Some Practical Considerations. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(2), 69-75.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  6. Fagan, T. K., & Wise, P. S. (2007). School psychology: Past, present, and future (3rd ed.). National Association of School Psychologists.
  7. Gallagher, L. P. (2018). Evolving educational landscapes: Implications for school psychology research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 869-888.
  8. Gresham, F. M. (2007). Evidence-based practices in school psychology: Procedural and outcome accountability. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 527-546.
  9. Harn, B. A., Parisi, D., & Stoolmiller, M. (2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools? Exceptional Children, 79(2), 181-193.
  10. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165-179.
  11. Jackson, L. M., & López, I. F. (2022). Culturally inclusive research methodologies in school psychology: A paradigm shift. Journal of School Psychology, 88, 43-57.
  12. Jacob, S., & Hartshorne, T. S. (2007). Ethics and law for school psychologists. John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Kazdin, A. E. (2003). Research design in clinical psychology (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  14. Koocher, G. P., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2018). Ethics in psychology and the mental health professions: Standards and cases. Oxford University Press.
  15. Kratochwill, T. R., & Shernoff, E. S. (2004). Evidence-based practice: Promoting evidence-based interventions in school psychology. School Psychology Review, 33(1), 34-48.
  16. Martínez-López, Z. A., Piqueras, J. A., & Inglés, C. J. (2021). Socio-emotional well-being and academic achievement: A comprehensive perspective. School Psychology International, 42(3), 263-282.
  17. McIntosh, K., & Horner, R. H. (2016). The importance of treatment integrity for improving outcomes for students. In Handbook of response to intervention (pp. 329-340). Springer.
  18. Merrell, K. W., Ervin, R. A., & Gimpel, G. A. (2006). School psychology for the 21st century: Foundations and practices. Guilford Press.
  19. Nastasi, B. K., & Hitchcock, J. (2016). Mixed methods research and culture-specific interventions: Program design and evaluation. SAGE Publications.
  20. National Association of School Psychologists (NASP). (2010). Principles for professional ethics. Bethesda, MD: Author.
  21. Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137-148.
  22. Reynolds, C. R., & Gutkin, T. B. (1999). The handbook of school psychology. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  23. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71-72.
  24. Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2020). The challenge of designing and researching within real-world contexts. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 299-316.
  25. Thomas, A. (2013). Best practices in school psychology: Systems-level services. National Association of School Psychologists.
  26. Wang, X., & Hancock, D. R. (2020). Advancements in technology and school psychology research: Emerging trends and implications. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859.
  27. Yamamoto, J., & Li, J. (2018). Culturally responsive research: Advancements and challenges in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 67, 6-20.